Comments by "Tony Wilson" (@tonywilson4713) on "Revolutionizing Flight! The Amazing Potential of the CFM RISE Engine." video.

@jimmygee3219 I'm another aerospace engineer and we get it all the time in every field of engineering. And I'm not talking about social media either. We get it from family, we get it from relatives, we get it from friends and we get it from complete strangers in the street. Most of all we get it from other people in the work place and including other engineers. If you tell people what they don't want to hear they don't like it and don't respond well. Then they will do and say anything to discredit you.
93
@Dumbrarere And they usually are that petty. 🤷‍♀🤷‍♀🤷‍♂🤷‍♂
3
@steveallen648 Well you should have been clear about that instead of waffling on with a pile of nonsense.
2
@The_ZeroLine WTF are you trying to say? Read your comment back to yourself before posting in future. You'll avoid sounding like a bowl of spaghetti.
1
@steveallen648 Dude STOP WATCHING BULLSHlT HYPE CHANNELS and think you know stuff. The TU 95 did NOT use this type of technology and it was NEVER nuclear powered as you implied. The TU 95 used contra-rotating propellers which were nothing new. The British Martin Baker MB5 prototype had contra-rotating propellers back in 1944. Before that the famous Macchi MC-72 Schneider Cup plane used contra-rotating props and in 1934 it set a world speed record which still stands to this day. BUT the original patent for contra-rotating propellers is by F. W. Lanchester in 1907. So please don't waste people's time with nonsense.
1