Comments by "Tony Wilson" (@tonywilson4713) on "Jordan Peterson FLAMES Andrew Tate? | The Kyle Kulinski Show" video.

About the same for me. A while back I watched a couple of his lectures that were from a few years back (from before his got into the political stuff) and he was a pretty good college professor who knew his subject and handled questions from students really well. I just watched one of his podcasts on climate change with Dr. Richard Lindzen. Its not a podcast I'd recommend to anyone unless they understand various topics especially complex system modelling. because its not so much what they say BUT WHAT THEY LEAVE OUT. I studied aerospace engineering and got trained in complex modelling and complex systems analysis. Stuff like aerodynamics, complex structures and spacecraft dynamics. They were both very right about the issues with research funding at universities. But then Lindzen is also incredibly dishonest in a few times. He does NOT lie about anything but he LEAVES OUT information on complex system modelling. Unless you have a background in that stuff you'd never spot it. Where Peterson really shows his colors is in his repeated references to people like Alex Epstein and Bjorn Lomberg who are 2 of the most dishonest people on the planet. They're first class gold medal cherry pickers with data & information and both are very sneaky how they present it. They aren't alone but the same sorts of discredited people keep turning up on podcasts (like the one Peterson hosts) where they know they WONT be challenged. I noted Peterson also had on Dr. Jay Bhattacharya who's been totally discredited and yet keeps turning up on these sorts of podcasts which profess to be honest public discussions but just aren't. I watched Bhattacharya and Economist Gigi Foster on Jon Anderson's (Former Australian Deputy Prime Minister) podcast and they STRAIGHT OUT LIED about Australia's COVID response. And I don't mean they made a mistake they outright lied. Especially Foster who's just a disgusting liar. It was some of her information that Saagar Enjeti made an clown out of himself last week.
10
You're right - "Some things are good and some things aren't." I think when he's talking about psychology he's good but then he should be its his area of expertise. When he's on politics, economics and the environment he's garbage. He mentions a real piece of garbage named Bjorn Lomberg who's an economist. I think he said they were on some sort of UN climate committee together. Lomberg is very good at clever mis-directions. He's like a 2nd gen Milton Freidman, who for some unknown reason is still worshipped by people as an economic genius.
7
@meowy4720 You're touching on a very touchy subject but its a subject that needs discussing and some have tried in the past and some of those people were WOMEN. Sorry for the long reply but I think you'll find this interesting. Years ago I came across 2 articles 1 is about a book written by a woman and the other was a news paper article written by a woman. Circa 2010 I read this odd book review in the Sunday paper in Perth Western Australia. I've tried to find it with no luck. It was about a book written by an American Psychologist. SHE had so many female patients with the same issues she wrote a book about it. They were all well educated, career orientated, successful types BUT with a description like the female version of an incel. She said the main problem was they judged men from the glass half empty view. It wasn't about what any man was or had or did. Their judgement was based on what they weren't. They all had these insane lists of things a man HAD TO BE and if just 1 thing was missing they were rejected. This psychologist said these women were all demanding a man that has never existed. They were all miserable and frustrated and complained about why their demands weren't being met. But that was one of the main tenements of feminism - be demanding. I'm sorry I can't tell you the book title or author. One day I really have to track it down. Circa 2005-06 Australian journalist Virginia Haussegger wrote an article titled "The sins of our feminist mothers." Its easy to find via google. She still has it as a pdf on her own website. BE WARNED that article caused a nuclear level shitstorm when it was published. Even years later you need to be careful who you wave that article at because it can be like throwing rocket fuel at a blazing fire.
4
@mercesletifer47 Its actually rare to have a good thread when divisive people like Jordan Peterson are the subject.
3
@berry6467 Be careful, women love to tell men we should get to know and understand their issues better, BUT IF WE DO, they have a tendency not to take it well if we start to know too much.
1