Comments by "Tony Wilson" (@tonywilson4713) on "Hillary ALREADY Blaming The Left For Future Dem Losses | The Kyle Kulinski Show" video.

Because none of them want to admit that she lost, because they hold onto the fact she won the popular vote. But they keep forgetting that's NOT what its about. Think of it like a football game. One team keeps marching down the field again and again. Out of 10 possessions they get 1 touchdown, 6 field goals, but throw 1 interception. The other team truly sucks. They are a rambling mess of bad calls, penalties and fumbles. They struggle on D giving up yards, 1st downs and points, but somehow they turn that 1 interception into a pick 6. Their O is even worse than their D. They can't move the ball, they fumble and get called for holding again and again. Their QB is sacked 5 times and gets picked off 4 times but somehow they manage to score 3 touchdowns off some gimmick plays and Hail Mary's. They suck so bad their kicker not only missed a couple of critical field goals but also missed 2 extra points on bad snaps, bad holds and bad kicking. WHO WON THE GAME. Was it the team with more first downs, more yards, more interceptions, fewer mistakes, better kicking and a flashy superstar QB? Or was it the team with 26 points instead of 25?
14
On the losing front do you know that people from her campaign went on and helped Australian Labour lose an election they should have won and then went on and helped British Labour to a disaster. I'm Australian and found that out from a Brit when I asked why British Labour ran a similar campaign to Australian Labour's losing campaign that had hints of Hilary's campaign. Their answer was all 3 campaigns had the same strategists involved. Think about what the DNC machine did to more recent campaigns like Andrew Yang's run for NY mayor? 1 question in the street and it was OVER. Why was that question even asked and why was he so badly advised and prepared? Look at Nina Turners run in Ohio and how nasty that got? FYI - I went to college in America and I hate what both parties are doing to the place.
9
@DoctorHouse999 Buddy, there's insanity in every democratic system on the planet. Its just a matter of how stupid it is. We used to have a joke in Australia about how sheep voted in Queensland, because of how gerrymandered the place was. But if we look at the history of every other state we have bits of insanity everywhere. These days we have Qanon people too, just less of them. I went to college in America and hate what BOTH the DEMs and GOP are doing these days. Both are disgusting in their ways. One of the truly crazy things is Puerto Rico and the territories. For the last 75 years (since WW2) America has preached freedom and democracy. Puerto Rico has 3.26 million US Citizens who CANNOT vote for POTUS and have just 1 NON-VOTING house seat. If you add in Guam and the other territories its 3.6 million who get a total of 5 NON-VOTING house seats. Rhode Island, Montana and Maine combined have 3.47 million and have 6 house seats, 6 senate seats and 12 electoral college votes. The Dakota's combined around 1/2 the population of Puerto Rico and have 2 house seats, 4 senate seats and 6 electoral college votes. Its insane to preach about democracy as you refuse to allow 3.6 million of your citizens any representation.
6
@cjvaye99 You've hit the nail on the head. TOO MANY people know her for what she is. They've seen through the hype. Hopefully the Trump supporters will eventually see it too. America needs somebody who's not a washed up baby boomer with something real. Almost anything real will do. Trump hit a raw nerve with part of America that felt left out and he tapped that. Fake as it was the alternative was Hilary and they'd had enough of that. The next POTUS will either save America or oversee its demise. Like other great empires and federations it will fracture into chunks. The real question is how many chunks?
2
@ros6860 You're right a lot of people forget Trump blasted past 16 Republicans including Jeb "the chosen one" Bush. As for Republicans keen to see Bernie run against Trump I don't think you're right. Steve Bannon has said many times that Bernie would have beaten Trump, but that could also have been slap at Hilary. He said Clinton was easy as she made herself an easy target for the way Trump campaigned. Rick Wilson (who ran 100s of GOP campaigns) made the claim that Bernie would have been easy to beat because he was the perfect candidate to use the typical "he's a socialist and wants to take all your stuff" toxic scare campaign. The other thing to consider is that Trump had ripped their party away from them. People like Rick Wilson got sent packing. So what is their game now. Is it to beat the Dems or get rid of Trump so they can have their party back. So its NOT clear what the republicans would have done against Bernie. Traditional GOP would have slammed him, but they weren't part of Trump's team. I don't think Trump would have dealt with Bernie as easily as he did with Hilary. Trump had been around her a lot and could predict what she would do. Bernie not so much. We'll never know.
1
@JP-xg6bv I think your right in that America at this moment has the craziest of the crazies in politics. The point I try to push is that everyone else has crazies too. Maybe they're not as crazy or there's fewer of them but we all have them. Right now I get a staggering number of adds for the Clive Palmer funded "United Australia Party." These people aren't as crazy as Trump and the Trumpsters but they are trying.
1
@jamiepaulzine4648 Yeah Russia get was funny one, because there certainly was Russian interference but nobody has ever really been able to PROVE what they were really doing. But there was an alternative interpretation that I have not seen any American show talk about. What if Comey had kept quiet on the emails and then Hilary had won? Just imagine the chaos that would have followed when the GOP found out. This concept was put forward by a Russian born American journalist/analyst Masha Gessen to the Australian program Planet America. When asked "Was Putin trying to get Trump elected?" The answer was an emphatic and blunt NO. The explanation was that Putin isn't a deep thinking political strategist he's an ex-KGB officer who deals in certainties and believes all elections are predetermined. He would have believed Hilary Clinton would win irrespective of anything else going on, because that's how elections work in Putin's Russia. Further Clinton herself as Sec. State was personally involved with slapping Russia and Putin with sanctions. So if you're Putin and the American you hate is about to be the next POTUS then what can you do? Like all KGB guys Putin favors chaos inside other countries. Look at the mess he got out of Brexit that cracked the EU and NATO. All they really did was the KGB version of divide and conquer. Use propaganda to cause chaos. Plus Putin had already seen the chaos that Wikileaks caused. So you wait until after the election and then start leaking information. Trump and the GOP would have gone off their collective rockers howling and screaming about how the Head of the FBI cheated Trump. Its totally plausible that Putin was NEVER trying to get Trump elected BUT WAS trying to setup Clinton. But this never got discussed in America because MSNBC, CNN and others were to busy screaming Russiagate!
1
@jtg1465 You can't say he WOULD have won, but its far more likely he would have won. I was listening to an older Mark Blyth vid yesterday to see what he had said and what had happened since. He related a story that on the night at the time Hilary was up by 10points in the count. His wife asked why he looked and if he still thought Trump would win. He answered YES because he knew the demographics and how the votes were being counted. The horrible reality is what happened and unfortunately we don't have Dr. Who's Tardis to go fix it. The real question is 2022 and how bad will the Dems do? After that will the GOP make Trump the first unelected Speaker as they are threatening.
1
@Wasted_Talent007 Nice description of what happened. The question remains if they will ever learn from it. I saw the Jeff Daniels America isn't the Greatest the other day. What do you think about what he said the the lefty about being so smart and yet losing all the time?
1
@SuperCucko You claim the football analogy is whatever you like BUT THE FACT IS THAT'S HOW ITS SCORED AND THE FACT is Hilary LOST just like Trump lost they did not secure enough electoral college votes to win. You Hilary and Trump can whine and cry and howl all you like BUT THOSE ARE THE RULES.
1
@Myrrhkuri Do you understand how American football is played? IF NOT then you probably don't understand the analogy. Its NOT about technicality its about how the game is scored according to the rules. Hilary did not lose on a technicality. Trump won because that is how the US presidential election is SCORED. You can say whatever you lie about it being fair or not or antiquated or not, but that is how the system works and those are the rules. Both Trump and Hilary are sore losers. They played the game. The rules are what the rules are. The counting is what the counting is. Hilary Lost in 2016 and Trump lost in 2020.
1
@ivandafoe5451 Good way to put it.
1