Comments by "Tony Wilson" (@tonywilson4713) on "50,000 Year Old ZOMBIE Virus Revived From Permafrost | The Kyle Kulinski Show" video.

  1. That's of course sensible and its what scientists have argued for some time. Because of all the ridiculous howling and screaming over COVID one thing that needed to be discussed but has NOT been discussed is the oversight of these labs. Back in 2011 there was a Dutch Researcher named Ron Fouchier who created a variation of avian flu that has been described as the deadliest virus humanity has ever encountered. Had it escaped rather than COVID we'd have already have over 64 million dead instead of 6.6 million. The problem that emerged after Ron Fouchier's work was that nobody was really aware of what he was doing. The Dutch government actually had to step in and shut him down because he wanted to tell the whole world how he did it and show how clever he was. He never considered the maniacs who would use it. If you do take a look at the whole Wuhan issue it was obvious there were issues. I DO NOT think that what they were doing was fundamentally wrong. China had faced MERS and SARS so investigating what might be next was smart. Getting other nations to help with that research was also smart. DOING THAT RESEARCH IN AN UNSAFE WAY WAS NOT SMART. An airborne virus like COVID needed to have been researched in a Level 4 lab NOT a Level 3 lab AND THAT HAS BEEN EXPLAINED BY EXPERTS. And 1 other thing. They redefined what was and what wasn't gain of function. Ron Fouchier's work would no longer be considered gain of function. Just like the work in Wuhan is also not considered to be gain of function. This is something else that has NOT been discussed publicly.
    1
  2. That's of course sensible and its what scientists have argued for some time. Because of all the ridiculous howling and screaming over COVID one thing that needed to be discussed but has NOT been discussed is the oversight of these labs. Back in 2011 there was a Dutch Researcher named Ron Fouchier who created a variation of avian flu that has been described as the deadliest virus humanity has ever encountered. Had it escaped rather than COVID we'd have already have over 64 million dead instead of 6.6 million. The problem that emerged after Ron Fouchier's work was that nobody was really aware of what he was doing. The Dutch government actually had to step in and shut him down because he wanted to tell the whole world how he did it and show how clever he was. He never considered the maniacs who would use it. If you do take a look at the whole Wuhan issue it was obvious there were issues. I DO NOT think that what they were doing was fundamentally wrong. China had faced MERS and SARS so investigating what might be next was smart. Getting other nations to help with that research was also smart. DOING THAT RESEARCH IN AN UNSAFE WAY WAS NOT SMART. An airborne virus like COVID needed to have been researched in a Level 4 lab NOT a Level 3 lab AND THAT HAS BEEN EXPLAINED BY EXPERTS. And 1 other thing. They redefined what was and what wasn't gain of function. Ron Fouchier's work would no longer be considered gain of function. Just like the work in Wuhan is also not considered to be gain of function. This is something else that has NOT been discussed publicly.
    1
  3.  @danmatera1885  I'm an engineer and see exactly what you describe in engineering. I just watched the PBS Frontline on Boeing's Max-8 fiasco and that's an example of people taking things for granted and that checks don't need to be done.
    1
  4. That's of course sensible and its what scientists have argued for some time. Because of all the ridiculous howling and screaming over COVID one thing that needed to be discussed but has NOT been discussed is the oversight of these labs. Back in 2011 there was a Dutch Researcher named Ron Fouchier who created a variation of avian flu that has been described as the deadliest virus humanity has ever encountered. Had it escaped rather than COVID we'd have already have over 64 million dead instead of 6.6 million. The problem that emerged after Ron Fouchier's work was that nobody was really aware of what he was doing. The Dutch government actually had to step in and shut him down because he wanted to tell the whole world how he did it and show how clever he was. He never considered the maniacs who would use it. If you do take a look at the whole Wuhan issue it was obvious there were issues. I DO NOT think that what they were doing was fundamentally wrong. China had faced MERS and SARS so investigating what might be next was smart. Getting other nations to help with that research was also smart. DOING THAT RESEARCH IN AN UNSAFE WAY WAS NOT SMART. An airborne virus like COVID needed to have been researched in a Level 4 lab NOT a Level 3 lab AND THAT HAS BEEN EXPLAINED BY EXPERTS. And 1 other thing. They redefined what was and what wasn't gain of function. Ron Fouchier's work would no longer be considered gain of function. Just like the work in Wuhan is also not considered to be gain of function. This is something else that has NOT been discussed publicly.
    1
  5. That's of course sensible and its what scientists have argued for some time. Because of all the ridiculous howling and screaming over COVID one thing that needed to be discussed but has NOT been discussed is the oversight of these labs. Back in 2011 there was a Dutch Researcher named Ron Fouchier who created a variation of avian flu that has been described as the deadliest virus humanity has ever encountered. Had it escaped rather than COVID we'd have already have over 64 million dead instead of 6.6 million. The problem that emerged after Ron Fouchier's work was that nobody was really aware of what he was doing. The Dutch government actually had to step in and shut him down because he wanted to tell the whole world how he did it and show how clever he was. He never considered the maniacs who would use it. If you do take a look at the whole Wuhan issue it was obvious there were issues. I DO NOT think that what they were doing was fundamentally wrong. China had faced MERS and SARS so investigating what might be next was smart. Getting other nations to help with that research was also smart. DOING THAT RESEARCH IN AN UNSAFE WAY WAS NOT SMART. An airborne virus like COVID needed to have been researched in a Level 4 lab NOT a Level 3 lab AND THAT HAS BEEN EXPLAINED BY EXPERTS. And 1 other thing. They redefined what was and what wasn't gain of function. Ron Fouchier's work would no longer be considered gain of function. Just like the work in Wuhan is also not considered to be gain of function. This is something else that has NOT been discussed publicly.
    1