Comments by "Tony Wilson" (@tonywilson4713) on "Zeihan on Geopolitics" channel.

  1.  @segalliongaming8925  Sorry but countries like Australia have placed skills requirements on immigration from developing nations. That's been copied by many countries. Sorry mate but I am in engineering and I see it all the time. There is a cancer that came out of economic policies in the 1990s that has had terrible consequences for the engineering industries AND its lead to us stripping those few skilled people from countries that can't lose them. PLUS a major reason why those people leave their countries is because of the economic and political crap we have dumped on them.
    1
  2.  @sunspot42  You're clearly NOT and engineer and have no idea what it actually takes to make a modern technological society FUNCTION. You obviously have no idea how energy is produced or consumed by a modern society because you can't see beyond your own front door. Don't panic most people have NO IDEA of where their electricity or water come from or where their waste water goes. Domestic household consumption of energy and water is nothing compared to industry. Most people cannot even begin to comprehend what's needed just so you can have a bottle of milk in your fridge. This is one of my giant bugs with economists. They know how markets work and what societies consume, but they have no idea how things are produced or delivered. This is why our energy grids are failing, fresh water systems are failing, waste water systems failing and all the rest of our infrastructure is breaking. None of the people making decisions or those holding the microphone have a clue. The idea that we can put solar panels on everyone's rooftops and the worlds problems will magically vanish is a fantasy. You forget we still have to dig the minerals out of the ground, process them into raw stock, process them into solar cells and then install them into solar panels. After that they can be installed on your roof. BUT THEN there's the system to get it into your home. That includes multiple supply and manufacturing systems for the wires to the inverter, the wires from the inverter and all the rest of the energy system in your house. Because people don't see the wires in their walls they don't even realise they exist most of the time. I live in Australia. Do you know how many products I can by here that have no industrial energy or water input? ONE and that's our genuine native arts & crafts. Everything from the food you eat, the clothes you wear, the car you drive, the bike you ride, the computer you use has to be dug from the ground, processed in to raw materials and then made into stuff you buy. Anything in your life that has metal, glass, plastics, paper,...etc involved industrial processes that requires energy. For an engineer its actually infuriating how ignorant the general population is of what it takes to provide all these things the rest of society takes for granted. I don't blame the Morlocks from eating the Eloi.
    1
  3. Actually he called Mearsheimer's assessment as "horse shit" 53:44 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdP01go8wdQ And I checked the population of the countries he lists is 263 Million. Add in Finland and its 268 million. Russia's population is around 140 million. I think you're in part right Peter is underplaying Western provocation, because he places more importance on demographics and resources while Mearsheimer is purely political. Ukraine is complex and there's bits of both. Plus and I have argued this with some of the Mearsheimer fans, Mearsheimer's side of politics (American Realists that also includes the Neocons) have done some nasty shite over recent decades. They all claim Mearsheimer was against the invasions of Iraq & Afghanistan, but they ignore it was his side of American politics who started BOTH. The Neocon ideology came out of U. Chicago where Mearsheimer teaches his "offensive realism" which is one of the most narcissistic philosophies in the history of the planet.
    1
  4. Actually that's exactly what the State SC for Michigan just did. They dismissed the case they were presented with had and told Michigan's Sec State to follow the law and for a PRIMARY vote that means you put every name put forward by the party on the ballot irrespective of eligibility or not. But (and its a big but) that ruling only applies to PRIMARY ballots which DO NOT decide the actual office. Glenn Kirschner did a video on this and he gave the example that in Michigan the Dems could put Obama's name on the PRIMARY ballot even though he is ineligible because he's already served 2 terms. Colorado and Maine are is different because their state laws on elections are NOT the same as Michigan. This is going to go through all the states 1 by 1 FOR THE PRIMARIES. For the actual FEDERAL ELCTION it will all depend on HOW the question is put to SCOTUS and how they rule on the 14th part 3.
    1
  5. Don't brag too much my grandfathers sheep dog was also (by these standards) Presidential material. I bet there's a guy in Iowa right now trying to get his favorite pig on the ballot just to see what happens.
    1
  6.  @fee1776  And another of the Chicago crowd Ronald Coase wrote this brilliant piece for the RAND corporation which you can still download if you try hard enough. I heard about it when Elizabeth Popp Borman was interviewed by Mark Blyth about her book "Thinking like an Economist." You can find interview on the Watson Institute as one of the Rhodes Centre podcasts and Brown U. In that paper Coase argued that America should Auction off all the radio & TV bands. He was laughed at by the RAND corporation and then laughed at by Congress because they all knew that it would lead to MONOPOLIES where those with enough money would just outbid everyone. They eventually gave Ronald Coase the the same FAKE Nobel prize they gave Freidman and his auctions became the flavor of the era for governments all over the Western World and its been a disaster EVERYWHERE.
    1
  7.  @GaryBickford  Sorry but I am calling BULLSHlT to your comment. ESPECIALLY the remark about very few economists in government being Freidmanites. They are almost exclusively Freidmanites BECAUSE they were all taught classical and neo-classical economics which is the polite way of saying they are all Freidmanites. Its most notable when you listen to the people in charge of places like the US Fed or Australian Reserve Bank or European Central Bank. You'll hear them refer to the "market adjusting" in some way and how they need to "show restraint." That's the give away they are a Friedmanite as it shows they believe the market will self adjust to a stable state. You might have gone to one of those odd little colleges most people haven't heard about OR one that is Left leaning like Brown U. (the ugly duckling of the Ivy League) OR one of the ones who had people like Richard Wolff who taught Marxist economics for decades. You should go and look up Prof Wolff's story on HOW & WHY he became a Marxist economist despite going to Harvard. Its actually an interesting story. He also did a series on Marx's contributions to Western Economics a few years ago. I'm no Marxist and actually think like Smith he was WRONG about wealth only being created by labor, but it was an excellent series to give perspective on how we got here. FYI - I think Prof Wolff is right about many things and 1,000% utterly and totally wrong about others. On post-Keynesianism I doubt you would even know what a post-Keynesian looks or sounds like and suggest you go and look up Steve Keen. He genuinely is a post-Keynesian and has NOTHING good to say about the economists in government anywhere on the planet. He hosts a weekly podcast Steve Keen & Friends and if you actually want to understand this stuff I suggest you join in.
    1
  8.  @rejvaik00  If you are going to criticise another country for what ever reason GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT. YES - we have compulsory voting BUT that does NOT MEAN you actually have to vote for anyone. As you said people can simply mismark the voting form. I had a family member who used to draw an extra box and write his football team's name beside it and tick that box. Same thing. The only thing that is compulsory is that you turn up and fill out a voting slip. How you fill it out is your choice. If you don't turn up then you get a please explain letter and so long as you give a reasonable explanation NOTHING ever happens AND I have never heard of anyone being fined. SECONDLY we DO NOT have first past the post like America and Britain. We have what is called preferential voting which I think Alaska has now adopted. It encourages more people to step up as candidates and provide more options. If the main parties get slack and put up crap candidates then it leaves the door wide open for other people. Its a system that keeps our parties a lot more honest. This is how the Teal Independents won so many seats at the last election. The main parties got slack. A lot of swing voters who had voted Right at the previous election did NOT vote LEF but voted Teal. Just as the Democrats have issues accepting that 2020 wasn't that good of a result Australian Labor doesn't accept the last election wasn't that good of a result for them. A lot of of swing voter didn't swing to them but swung sideways. So please in future GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT AND NOT BULLSHlT PEOPLE.
    1
  9.  @rejvaik00  Well you need to be clear when you take a jibe at another country. Its gets people damn upset when you leave things out or get things wrong. The bit I hated was your remark that it makes our politicians lazy. Our preferential system makes lazy politicians vulnerable even the ones at the top. When Prime Minister John Howard got his ass handed to him it was by an independent with no party at all behind her. The Teals in the last election handed both parties a slap across the face and in the next one could easily sweep then away if they do things a little better. Their biggest issue right now is being heard and that is a problem with our media.
    1
  10.  @TheMrgoodmanners  LISTEN DlCKHEAD AND ACTUALLY LISTEN ITS NOT THE SAME TECHNOLOGY MOST OF THESE COMPANIES ARE PUMPING And I really do mean to be SCREAMING THAT AT YOU. Because these things have been said and said and said and no matter how many times you stupid clowns wont listen. I know about the reactor in Russia and there's another in China because all the SMR projects are listed on Wikipedia. I know about the reactors in submarines and aircraft carriers. I'm an engineer and used to work with ex-US Navy Nuclear Power plant operator/technician who served on Aircraft Carriers. He told me about his training and the way they are operated. You simply can't just use military reactors in domestic installations. Then there's other realities. If you actually go back and look at the history of reactors many would now be classified as SMALL. Many of this new generation are completely different technology and want to use things like TRISO fuel pellets. NOBODY has yet proven TRISO works short term or long term let alone if it can be manufactured at scale. Almost all of them want to use HALEU fuel grades and there's NO PLANTS that make HALEU for domestic use. You stupid clowns are driving all the engineers crazy BECAUSE YOU JUST WONT LISTEN. All you do is keep repeating the same stupid SHlT again and again.
    1
  11.  @re1v3r  Yeah but getting a score of 2 out of 10 might be better than 1 out of 10 but its still a fail. And a score of 49 out of 100 might be even better but its still a fail. You can get a score of 98 out of 100 and it can still be a fail if the passing grade is 99. I'd take Australia over many other places but that doesn't mean we get a passing grade on anything.
    1
  12.  @InformedKiwi  It never ceases to amaze that Kiwis think arrogant stupidity is a virtue. Listen and you might learn something. History is littered with better technologies that were never adopted. Example 1: VHS tapes. Sorry but BetaMax was better in every way but 1. Better picture, better re-record, better in almost everything except they were more expensive to make and Hollywood wanted cheaper. Example 2: Molten Salt Reactors were better and more efficient and produced less waste than Water cooled reactors but were developed second and NOBODY held the patents that they could control. If Chernobyl or Fukushima had been MSRs then there would have been NO ACCIDENTS. Do you know the coal industry developed a new generation of boilers for power stations that would have reduced world CO2 emissions by several billion tons a year? Rio Tinto was one of the main players in that. They even had advertisements on TV at one stage telling everyone about their new technology. They even built a power station in Japan that used it. It was a technology that wasn't adopted, because Rio Tinto and others would have lost billions because the amount of coal they sell would have dropped significantly. The issues with producing and using Hydrogen from wind were solved years ago. The issues with using it in gas turbines were mostly solved in the 1990s BUT nobody wanted it at the time especially the jet fuel industry and the natural gas industry. The jet fuel guys didn't need to worry because they might have worked out the engine issues but not the fuel tank issues. Try coming down of your self imposed arrogance high chair WTFU. Being good at rugby means JACK SHlT about everything else. Just be grateful there's something you clowns are good at. And just because Scott Dixon, Scott McLaughlin and Shane Van Hamburger can drive doesn't mean the rest of you farking can.
    1
  13. ​ @Battleneter  Yeah don't remind us about how much money our politicians have in their pockets. What I will say as an engineer is we need to be clear about what type of coal are those mines producing because there's 2 distinct types. As an engineer I hate the fact that none of this is rarely explained so here's the basics. ONE is THERMAL COAL and its only good for burning to generate heat, hence the name "thermal coal." Its what's burned in power stations and other heating applications. Thermal coal is a zombie industry. Its dead but refuses to stay dead and who knows how many times we have to shoot it to finally be rid of it. As I like to put it to the pro-coal clowns "If burning coal is so fantastic then why don't we go back to steam powered trains and have coal powered trucks?" THER OTHER is METALLURGICAL COAL and that's what is used to process iron ore into steel hence the name. What makes it different is the lack of impurities. Its almost pure carbon so when its used in making steel you get good quality steel with few impurities. That's really important when you want to make things like stainless steel and you want bridges not to fall down. Because its got few impurities its also good for other applications like water filtering and for manufacturing carbon fibre to make lighter cars, boats and air planes. The metallurgical coal industry which Australia is a leader in is NOT GOING ANYWHERE because we need steel. If you want wind turbines they need steel towers. If you want public transport then trains, train lines, buses and boats all need steel. Then there's the millions of other products that are made from steel. Yes there's lower emission systems but to replace the worlds entire steel production industry will take years and cost $$ Trillions. These just aren't things we can simply buy from K-Mart or Amazon.
    1
  14.  @moy_moy85  I'll pay that one mate. 👍👍
    1
  15. ​ @tsubadaikhan6332  Sort of yes sort of no. Like almost everything in Australia's mining game it comes down to 2 companies BHP & Rio Tinto because they are both into iron ore and coal. Of those 2 Rio Tinto has substantial Aluminium assets in the North of Australia at Weipa and Gove, where I have worked on a project. That has since been spun off in to a separate company called Rio Tinto Aluminium. BHP Spun there Aluminium assets of and founded the company South 32 (2015) whose assets are in the far South West of Australia. The company you are thinking of is Alcoa who are 100% American with their headquarters in Pittsburgh and yes they quite big in Australia's Aluminium industry but nothing else so we don't hear as much about them. They own 2 mines and 3 Alumina refineries in the South West of Western Australia in the same region as South32. Alcoa also has some other Australian assets like the smelter at Gladstone. Its the South32 and Alcoa interests in Western Australia that are the main reason Honeywell setup a major mineral processing division in Perth. I never worked for Honeywell but did work with their people a couple of times.
    1
  16.  @idesofmarchUNIAEA  No Russia is only number 8. Production & Reserves (kilotonnes) as of 2018 (source Wilipedia) 1Australia 110,000 6,000,000 2 Guinea 82,000 7,400,000 3 China 60,000 1,000,000 4 Brazil 35,000 2,600,000 5 Indonesia 23,000 1,200,000 6 India 22,000 660,000 7Jamaica 7,700 2,000,000 8 Russia 6,100 500,000 9 Kazakhstan 5,800 160,000 10 Vietnam 4,000 3,700,000
    1
  17.  @mabamabam  If your going to ask my opinion on economists I'll warn you up front that I think they are a clueless pack of insanely overrated clowns to put it as simply as I can. I started looking into economics a couple of years ago because I go tired of clowns with economics degrees interfering in projects. They are like seagulls the fly in, flap their wings make lots of noise and SHlT on everything before flying off and leaving a mess behind for others to clean up. The biggest issue is that economics education has become an incredibly narrow field of academia. A lot of very wealthy people started funding the leading universities to teach what they wanted taught and to publish papers that favored their profits. It really started a long time ago when John D. Rockefeller helped fund and create the University of Chicago to produce "more of him." Its also where Milton Freidman taught for decades and also where John Mearsheimer currently teaches. I really can write pages on them. I can explain in detail how Milton Freidman's acolytes have caused the current energy crisis. The War in Ukraine didn't cause it, but it did exacerbated the issues already present. We are actually in a situation that's been almost 30 years in the making and will take 10-25 years to fix depending on which country and how bad you have screwed up. I'm Australian and we have screwed up badly but we might have a way out, but its going to be damn hard work.
    1
  18.  @mabamabam  I don't know what's happening at your end but I can still see it here. there is some real insanity with the YT algorithm. It hides all sorts of stuff. I go accused by someone the other day of deleting my own comments which wasn't true.
    1
  19. It could be I mention specific people and one specific university in Chitown that was in part funded by a rather ruthless person who thought the world needed more of him. He was a rock fellow sort of person. Bottom line is we (as in every developed nation has some very serious issues with energy that are the direct result of economics ideology mostly formulated by a person who thought "greed was good."
    1
  20.  @mabamabam  In a nutshell when the economists told every one that privatisation would provide competitions and competition would provide better services at cheaper prices - THEY LIED. Because uncle Milton said corporations have one duty and that's to provide profit to owners and that does NOT EVER produce better services or lower prices. SO THEY LIED
    1
  21.  @mabamabam  But worse than that it also stifled any new investment in base load power ANYWHERE. its pretty simple if you did Econ 101. If the population goes up then energy demand goes up. If you DO NOT build any new baseload power stations to cover the increased demand then prices go up. So if you were lucky enough to buy a 1/2 used power station from a government there is zero incentive to build anything else. because if you build additional power stations then supply will go up and prices will go down. So from a corporate perspective you run that old 1/2 used power station as hard as you can with the least amount of maintenance you can until the day it drops dead. And then you move all the money off shore and claim there's nothing left to clean up the site. That buckaroo has been going on everywhere and there is now a lot of very old poorly maintained power stations that will over the next decade simply die and when they do you will see energy prices go bonkers as they have done in a few places already.
    1
  22.  @mabamabam  One of the reasons I say the acolytes of uncle Milton have caused the energy crisis is based on the fact that they have no idea what it takes to physically generate and distribute energy as well as make the equipment to use it. It doesn't matter if we are talking about electricity or gas or even coal when people used it to cook with and heat their homes. Worse when you put it to them they don't care because all the care about is their farking "sophisticated markets!!!!!!" They have no idea what it takes to build anything or maintain it. They see numbers on a page and they do is ask 2 questions. 1) How do we get certain numbers smaller? 2) How do we get certain numbers bigger? And they are experts in everything else - just ask them.
    1
  23. Never forget that the acolytes of uncle Milton promised everyone that privatising state functions would provide better service at lower prices. Name a country where that actually worked? There's a Rand Corp report that says the top 1% of America made $47 Trillion. When Time magazine wrote about it they simply rounded it up to $50 Trillion and by some estimates its now up to $55 Trillion and climbing. More recently the Congressional Budget Office released a report on family wealth. So far the only person who I have seen mention it is Richard Wolff. You can find it easily by googling "congressional budget office family wealth." Go look at the main graph to see how well the bottom 50% of America has done. I checked on Australia's data. Its presented in quints (20% increments) so the numbers are different but it tells exactly the same story. The people at the top have made of with vast sums of money while the rest have paid for it.
    1
  24.  @mabamabam  If you are interested a really great channel to watch is Gary's Economics here on YT. Gary Stevenson (a Brit) comes from the lower end of the spectrum but found his way to the LSE. He graduated top of his class and went to work for Citibank where (by his mid 20s) was their top trader in the world. He made billions and got paid millions. These days he's explaining how economics actually works. He's got a brilliant take on why so many commentators are wrong all the time.
    1
  25. Engineer here and I have worked on mine site construction in Australia and you have hit the 3 magic words. SMART PROJECT MANAGER Forget just being in the snow and ice it matters in every industry. Like Messiahs there many claimants and most are frauds.
    1
  26. YEAH SURE - SOON AS THEY ARE AVAILABLE. Go look at the websites of the companies all promoting SMRs and they are all trying to raise money to get going. AT BEST the SMR industry might be what the envision sometime in the mid 2030s. The SMRs being proposed ARE NOT the same technology that's in Submarines and Aircraft Carriers. The YT Channel "Decouple Media" has a couple of good videos on the subject. I can't say I agree with everything that's said on Decouple but its mostly sound because he talks to actual engineers and I am an engineer.
    1
  27.  @jesan733  Quick point nuclear IS NOT FAST. Hinkley Point C which has 2 EPRs (European Power Reactor) and will take 10 years to complete. It will also take at least 20 years to break even on construction costs based on current British energy prices. Yeah I calculated all that out a couple of months ago. Finland which recently commissioned an EPR took 18 years to complete. That said once constructed and if they run them at 90-100% then they are very cheap for BASE LOAD. But is you check the IEA data the moment you start trying to throttle them back the cost per kilowatt climbs and at a certain point which varies for reactor types it skyrockets. There's a great talk on the YT channel Decoupled about the Canadian CANDU. They are not only cheaper but quicker to build and of the reactor types so far used they are the only one not to have a melt-down. All the talk about SMRs being quick is utter crap and garbage from companies looking for investors. The best any of them claim is that they'll be ready for shipment to sites MAYBE in the mid 2030s. Yes there's a couple under construction but go check the details. They're prototypes.
    1
  28. I'm Australian. If California, Oregon and Washington state got fed TF up with all of their money going to the red states then they might just consider it.
    1
  29. And don't forget Australia, Canada, New Zealand and all the others who'd jump when POTUS says jump. I'm Australian and we have joked that we are the 51st state for decades.
    1
  30.  @jrmint2  Damn good point and I love your description of NK.
    1
  31.  @grzegorczyk1983  Actually we are starting to slip down that list. There's DC, Puerto Rico, Alberta, Taiwan, Guam, Diego Garcia,... heck even the Philippines have rejoined the list and might even be higher than us. Although we still have Pine Gap and that keeps our ranking up.
    1
  32.  @TheLocoUnion  The other thing everyone seems to have forgotten is that the Chines, Koreans, Japanese, Vietnamese and Philippinos have been fighting each other for several 1000 years. There's some seriously old grudges among them and sooner or later someone will do the wrong thing. How that pans out is another thing with so many possibilities they can't be listed.
    1
  33.  @icorcka76  Beach shorts outdoors in -20C????
    1
  34.  @ktg8030  That's way more difficult than it sounds, but there are some ways to screw it up. Go look at a map and look at just how big Russia actually is and look at Ukraine. Striking at infrastructure is a lot easier with smaller chunks of land. BUT if you hit infrastructure in just the right place then its chaos. If you go and look at the 2003 Blackout that smashed the Northeast of America and a chunk of Canada that was just a basic fault in a local part of the grid in Ohio. However it caused a cascade event. Kind of like dominoes falling over. So the real question for Ukraine isn't if they can take down the Russian power grid, that's unlikely, BUT they might be able to hit a couple of key places and cause enough chaos that the Russians stop doing what they are doing. The Ukrainians wont touch any of the gas infrastructure because they know this war will end and those pipelines are how Europe functions. They have probably been told already that if they want support don't touch the gas. Major power plants are probably also out and that leaves power lines and substations. Both are soft targets, are reasonably easy to repair. I doubt they hit Moscow but you might expect some of those cities near Ukraine to get the main substations hit.
    1
  35.  @antoncarmoducchi6057  Good comment more nuanced than the clown who started the thread. And I say clown NOT because of the pro-renewable stance he makes BUT BECAUSE of the ridiculous SIZE of the claim. I am an engineer and YES we have an abundance of wind and solar. THE PROBLEM is that most of it is a long way from where we need it and IT COSTS MONEY to transmit energy. The OTHER PROBLEM the wind & solar brigade wont accept let alone acknowledge is what it takes to have a 100% wind & solar system for an entire nation. Like many other things up to a certain point its fine but then starts getting harder and harder. One of the major things is grid stability which few people are talking about even among engineers. Its been a growing problem since the 1990s when we started connecting more and more computers. The switch mode power supplies cause noise back into the grid. In some instances that noise can collect into nasty harmonics. Its just something few are aware of unless they are right into that sort of thing or (like me) you've encountered people who are into that stuff. All these people who just think its a matter of just throwing up wind turbines across the country and/or plonking solar on roof tops are ignorant clowns.
    1
  36.  @dixonhill1108  I hadn't heard that term "Cantrailian" before but I got it. And yeah we are basically the 51st and 52nd states. The only question is which of us is the 51st and which is the 52nd. Or maybe Puerto Rico thinks its 51st and we are just the 52dn & 53rd. Do you know when Australia was pushed to get its turn at the UN Security council the main objection was that it would just guarantee America a second vote? Which is sadly true. In early/mid 2018, about 18 months into the Trump Presidency I read a report on its affect on Australian Foreign Policy. They basically admitted to a major problem. For about 50 years AFP was basically "What do the Americans want?" But nobody had written any FP without American input in so long they didn't know what to do at times. I forced a lot of our diplomatic corps to think for themselves. Its one of the odd positive things about the Trump presidency. By accident it made a lot of countries think for themselves for the first time in decades. This is something the Biden team are yet to grasp fully. They now have allies who aren't just followers and will just do as they are told to do like all through the cold war and war on terror.
    1
  37.  @dixonhill1108  Closely followed by a John Oliver like observation. Canada, everyone else's favorite American State. Closely followed by: Why do Canadians say "Sorry" so often? Its their way of telling the rest of the world, "Sorry about our neighbors!" in just 1 word.
    1
  38.  @dixonhill1108  You're right we don't have a specific state like Quebec with its ridiculous sense of self importance that the rest of the country can't stand, BUT we do have New South Wales with its ridiculous sense of self importance that the rest of the country can't stand. The difference is the Quebecois speak French and New South Welshmen speak SHlT!
    1
  39.  @dixonhill1108  I spent 4 months in Saskatchewan in 2017-18 and I got that there's huge gulf between Eastern and Western Canada. Australia has some of that but not quite the same either as we also have significant rivalries going north South as well.
    1
  40.  @kwazhims3lf  Every country has at least one ASSH0LE they wished would shut up, even Canada the politest nation in the world. It was a waste water treatment plant that was destroyed by the local CANADIAN engineer less than 2 months after handover because he let it freeze solid. After not getting paid for getting the plant finished and operating the first time around. And then keeping me on hold for over a year. The Canadian insurance companies expected me stop and drop everything on a whim and at MY EXPENSE fly back and fix what a CANADIAN BROKE without guaranteeing I'd get paid. 99% of Canadians are fabulous people. You're NOT in that 99%.
    1
  41.  @agaragar21 You make about 1/10th of valid point 1) There was no genocide but there certainly were some very ugly incidents. The stolen generation was also not a genocide because despite being incredibly ugly and misguided it targeted children of mixed heritage. 2) The subject of native reserves was done away with the establishment of native title laid down by the Marbo decision. ALSO since we are on the subject of invading and taking land can you please tell me which Italian I should hold accountable for the invasion of Britain in 55BC and then which German, Dane, Swede or Norwegian I hold accountable for for the Germanic and Nordic Invasions that happened after the Romans left Britain OR do you expect me to hold the French accountable for William the Conqueror who was actually 1/2 French and 1/2 Norwegian? The point is don't be so simplistic about such complex things. Also there's a fair amount of evidence that the current Aboriginal peoples of Australia were NOT the first people of Australia. This is most evident in the distinct styles of rock art. Its not spoken about much because although there is evidence is a fairly sensitive topic and not enough evidence to be conclusive. Finally there is no doubt that the European settlement of Australia was a disaster for the native population, but that has been the case with every mass migration in history. What I hate about people being so simplistic is they IGNORE what has been done to redress the situation in Australia.
    1
  42.  @mrspaceman2764  That's also a distinct possibility.
    1
  43.  @invaderjoshua6280  If you want to know where its just bonkers. Try aviation (I have a pilots license) Altitude is in feet. Speed is on knots or miles per hour. Weather is in kilometers of visibility. Navigation can be in almost anything including parsecs. Fuel can be in gallons, litres, pounds and/or kilograms depending on the plane your flying.
    1
  44.  @JR-N-TX  Go and type "tallest wind turbine" into google and it will come back that the largest are 1,000ft NOT 1,000m. I just checked and the Burj Khalifa tower in Dubai is (according to Wikipedia) the worlds tallest structure at 829.8 m (2,722 ft)
    1
  45.  @robhoffman510  AND DO YOU KNOW WHAT?? AND YES THIS IS THE SOCIAL MEDIA VERSION OF SCREAMAING AT YOU *THE HOLE WORLD IS TIRED OF THAT SECTION OF THE AMERCIAN POPULATION WHO HAVE IT GOOD THINKING THEY REPRESENT THE BEST OF EVERYTHING IN THE WORLD* Google "congressional budget office family wealth" and you'll get a report that cannot be refuted that shows 50% of America is WORSE OFF now than they were before the 2008 GFC. The Top 10% who caused the GFC and got bailed out with $4 trillion from Bush and another $4 trillion from Obama and are now over $20 trillion better off. The sooner America deals with the hyper-welfare queens on Wall Street and starts looking after the other 90% of the nation then the rest of the World might start listening to your crap.
    1
  46. ENGINEER HERE: EVs make a lot of sense if you want the human race to survive on this planet. We simply can't keep abusing it the way we have for the past 250 years, BUT WE NEED A BETTER PLAN. There's 1.5 Billion registered cars and 500 million trucks in the world. It took decades to build all of those as well as staggering amounts of ENERGY to dig the raw materials out of the ground, process them into raw feed stock and then process that feed stock into the things we all take for granted. Its not just the Lithium, Nickel, Cobalt and other less common metals its also the steel, copper and aluminium needed for making the cars and upgrading the power grids. We are about to start paying the price for having let a very small number of people have way too much say in how our nations function.
    1
  47. @Darth.Augustus EXACTLY - go have an actual look at where the Spratly's are on a map. They are no where near China but they make blocking the South China Sea a real possibility.
    1
  48.  @mikeryan2802  Thumbs up
    1
  49.  @brianniegemann4788  What trade are you talking about? We trade with SOUTH Korea for raw materials to them and finished goods back. As far as I know we DO NOT trade much at all with North Korea. There was a case a few years ago when a North Korean cargo ship was caught dropping boxes of drugs in our waters for our criminal gangs. We are one of the very nations anywhere with a North Korean embassy. I only know about that because it came up when the drug ship was caught. As far as I know that's about it.
    1
  50.  @brianniegemann4788  No prob - easy mistake.
    1