Comments by "Tony Wilson" (@tonywilson4713) on "Israel Attacks Iran, Again - Part 2 || Peter Zeihan" video.

Me too. I have a degree in aerospace and work in industrial control systems and when it comes to engineering topics Peter is FULL of BS. He simply does not know or does not care. Peter is a100% wrong about the differences between solid fuel and liquid fuel rockets. Its liquid fuel rockets that are far more complex than solid fuel. In simplest terms solid fuel rockets are tubes with a nozzle. There are no pumps or valves or any of the fueling systems required. Its an idiotic claim and it shows YET AGAIN that when it comes to engineering topics Peter does NOT KNOW what he's talking about.
23
Along with that BS about the Israeli air force Peter is also 100% wrong about the differences between solid fuel and liquid fuel rockets. Its liquid fuel rockets that are far more complex than solid fuel. In simplest terms solid fuel rockets are tubes with a nozzle. There are no pumps or valves or any of the fueling systems required. Its an idiotic claim and it shows YET AGAIN that when it comes to engineering topics Peter does NOT KNOW what he's talking about. FYI - I have a degree in aerospace engineering.
7
Along with that BS about the Israeli air force Peter is also 100% wrong about the differences between solid fuel and liquid fuel rockets. Its liquid fuel rockets that are far more complex than solid fuel. In simplest terms solid fuel rockets are tubes with a nozzle. There are no pumps or valves or any of the fueling systems required. Its an idiotic claim and it shows YET AGAIN that when it comes to engineering topics Peter does NOT KNOW what he's talking about. FYI - I have a degree in aerospace engineering.
4
@theboringchannel2027 On geopolitics he's good but then that's his area of expertise. I'm angry because he has no excuse for checking with an engineer before doing these shite videos.
1
@crosslink1493 Go and look how its done. Its a technology that's incredibly well developed. The manufacturing was sorted out decades ago. A lot of the propellant combinations were sorted out decades ago. Think about all the air to air, air to ground, surface to air and other missiles. Then there's the boosters used on the rockets that launch satellites. From the smallest of hobby rockets all the way to the giant boosters for SLS its a technology that's incredibly well sorted out. One of my favorite systems is the Pegasus system first developed by Orbital RTK that's now owned by Grumman. It uses a very similar propellant to that used in the Space Shuttle and SLS boosters. Its incredibly reliable and they can mold it in to various shapes to control the burn. Xyla Foxlin has a great channel here on YT. She's done several rocket videos and gives good details on the motors she uses. One of her rockets did over Mach 2.
1
Along with that BS about the Israeli air force Peter is also 100% wrong about the differences between solid fuel and liquid fuel rockets. Its liquid fuel rockets that are far more complex than solid fuel. In simplest terms solid fuel rockets are tubes with a nozzle. There are no pumps or valves or any of the fueling systems required. Its an idiotic claim and it shows YET AGAIN that when it comes to engineering topics Peter does NOT KNOW what he's talking about. FYI - I have a degree in aerospace engineering.
1
@LewisPulsipher Like a few others he's good on geopolitics. I just hate when he gets into subjects he DOES NOT UNDERSTAND like engineering.
1
@alireza5546 Agreed on all of it. As I just said in another reply - I like Peter when he's talking geopolitics because he knows his stuff on that, but when he starts talking technology he just sucks. He needs to hire an engineer (or 2) and get his facts right.
1
@MichaelPlatson MAYBE By pointing out the fact that on this subject Peter doesn't have a damn clue what he's talking about there's also other things he's got wrong???? I like Peter when he's discussing geopolitics BUT DAMN he's a clown when it comes to technology.
1