Comments by "Tony Wilson" (@tonywilson4713) on "Biden dropout debate EXPLODES: "Biggest DISASTER in party history"" video.

  1. 22
  2. 1
  3. ​ @keenannorris3309  GREAT and IMPORTANT question: Empircal data is fantastic until you get people FILTERING IT and MAIPULATING IT to suit their agenda or narrative. Here's a perfect example and sorry if this takes explaining. Yale educated Economist Gigi Foster who's based in my country Australia made some famous claims during COVID. She was adamant that lockdowns were wrong and we should do the Swedish thing. She famously said on 60 Minutes Australia "They'll die anyway" in reference to older and infirmed people. She was panned by other staff from UNSW where she works and especially those who work in microbiology and health care. BUT SHE NEVER LET UP. In 2023 on a public discussion panel (ABC Australia's QandA) she made the claim that the Australian Governments response to COVID had saved at most 10,000 lives and she had the "Empirical Data" to prove it. She really slammed down everyone on that panel and in the audience with the "I have the data you don't and I am right!" routine. THERES A PROBLEM and I hope one day to ram this down her disgusting arrogant throat publicly. I know the data she was using and I know how she manipulated it. I was watching the COVID stats for the world via worldometers(dot.com) and they had the data from every government agency on a single page. For many countries like Australia, Canada and America you could also access their data state by state. What Gigi Foster did was make that claim based on the world average and at the time she made that claim the world average of COVID deaths per million people compared to Australia's stat said we could have had 20,000 more dead when we had around 10,000. HOWEVER when you check the Swedish Data and Sweden was the example she cited again and again AT THE SEWIDH fatality rate we would have had over 60,000 dead. So her claim on having and presenting Empirical Data was MANIPULATIVE, FALSE, MISLEADING and a clear case of ACADEMIC FRAUD for which she has never been held accountable. And this illustrates something with the way people use and manipulate data and in fact any data. WHAT FILTERS and AVERAGING and STATISTICAL manipulations are they using. There have been many many scandals out of Academic research over this and they will continue so long as people can make money or get their research funded OR WORSE there is a political angle they can push. Sorry for the long reply but I hope that answers your question because it is actually a very valid question.
    1
  4. 1
  5. 1