Comments by "TheOneWith TheEyeOfTruth" (@theonewiththeeyeoftruth884) on "AT&T Tech Channel" channel.

  1.  @iamf6641  1.3 second delay, and yes the president was holding a phone. So what? The transmissions used radio waves.
    1
  2.  @iamf6641  Yes, radio waves, which is what they used to transmit communications to the moon. That's what I said. What part of that are you not understanding? The delay is not missing, kid.
    1
  3.  @iamf6641  23 is a kid. The landings were real. The transmission was via radio waves, and the delay is there. There is nothing you can say about anything.
    1
  4.  @iamf6641  Still live with your parents? Most likely. Who do you support? What advanced career do you have? How strong are you, physically? Only 23-year-olds think 23 is not a kid. You don't have the adult perspective yet to know the difference. Anyway, you don't have any case about the radio communication.
    1
  5.  @iamf6641  Whatever you can make up. Tell me you make a bajillion dollars, and you get to buy candy with it every weekend. Yeah, you're an IT graduate who gets voice communication concepts wrong, doesn't know reality from what's fake, and can't form a sentence. That's not what you get from post-secondary education. You're full of shit.
    1
  6.  @iamf6641  Me too. I'm glad we can agree on that. What do you actually believed happened? No president call? What?
    1
  7.  @iamf6641  What the president said was scripted? The whole series of missions was scripted? What?
    1
  8.  @iamf6641  In 1/6th gravity and vacuum for hours at a time over a large area? The astronauts are lightweight over their entire bodies. It can't be faked.
    1
  9.  @iamf6641  You can't explain how. Also, why are all the hoax arguments wrong? Arguments such as: no stars wrong shadow directions astronauts should be pitch black on the shadowed side of the lander rockets don't work in vacuum etc. If it's a hoax, then why were all those arguments (and others) completely wrong?
    1
  10.  @iamf6641  Who said what is the dark side of the moon. No source, no citation. Your quotes are the worst ever. I'm talking about the side of the lander away from the sun; the side of the lander that's not directly lit by the sun. It's still lit indirectly by sunlight bouncing off the moon's surface. So the hoaxer argument that it should be pitch black on the dark side of the lander (of the LANDER, of the LANDER, not dark side of the MOON) is BOGUS! "daekside of the moon" "they even said its the dark side of the moon" Can't you follow along in one single thought from start to finish? Were you able to follow that, without quoting something else that no one ever said? There is no hoax, because there are no valid hoax arguments. That's it.
    1
  11.  @iamf6641  Yeah, you know how you can actually see the moon's surface? You see it because sunlight bounces off it. How do you think we see things? (We see light from it.) Therefore, there is light bouncing "from thee moosns suface lmao", as you so eloquently stated. So what's funny?
    1
  12.  @iamf6641  Yeah, it's always vague from you. It's because you can't respond to anything I've said.
    1
  13.  @iamf6641  You have nothing. I guess you don't think it's a hoax after all.
    1
  14.  @iamf6641  You're! As in you're no IT graduate. And no, only an explanation why all hoax evidence is wrong, or one valid piece of evidence from you, would shut me up. But you'll never have either.
    1
  15.  @iamf6641  Go ahead, little kid.
    1
  16.  @iamf6641  Yeah, I know, but was there going to be any evidence from you? Something to back up your claims, other than you just getting communication times wrong, and everything else wrong? Do you have something that's correct? Or were you just kidding about doubting the moon landings?
    1
  17.  @iamf6641  Just a little evidence. The littlest easiest one.
    1
  18.  @iamf6641  I only ask because I know there isn't any.
    1
  19.  @iamf6641  Or you could be a man and commit some evidence for scrutiny, without all the really bad excuses. Are you telling me there was nothing behind your repeated posts all the way up this thread? You have the time to post all that, but no time for the slightest evidence? That's telling me there is nothing you've got.
    1
  20.  @iamf6641  No, don't believe what they say. Follow the evidence. The evidence indicates (only) that they were real. That's just another excuse (believe NASA). I don't care what NASA says. The evidence, which also comes from sources outside NASA, says they're real. You were the sheep who saw one YouTube video, and echoed what some guy on the video told you.
    1
  21.  @iamf6641  You don't have anything else.
    1
  22.  @iamf6641  Oh, mom jokes, what a little kid thing to do. Thanks for making my point. What you will tell me, huh? I lost count of how many times I've said this, but GO AHEAD ! (FFS)
    1
  23.  @iamf6641  I guess that's what you were talking about telling me. Thanks.
    1
  24.  @zapbranigan5099  Excuse me. I was talking to the 23-year-old kid.
    1
  25. It's all real. You not understanding something because you lack the education or the information does not indicate any problem with the moon program.
    1