Youtube comments of LifeAD3.0 (@Leslie3.0Life).
-
45
-
29
-
27
-
19
-
14
-
I'm in Panama now
( i was also here a year ago) and I just came from a 3-week "scouting" trip in CR. It's not even close. The main cost people have will face is rent or mortgage. I have been pricing apartments in the nicer parts of Panama City, and I can't believe what I can get for under $1000 -even less, if I'm willing to live a bit outside the city. I'll be flying to David/Boquette next week, and then staying in Coronado for a week. I definitely will do my research before deciding if I want to move full time or part time to Panama. I am lucky that I can afford to live in the US, but I would embrace the peaceful and slow life of Panama, and frankly, I could live like a Queen compared to US. If I like it after 2 years, I could definitely see purchasing an investment home here. ( But i'm not making final decisions until I finish my scouting trips to Mexico, Portugal, Peru and Equidor in the next few months, and Greece and Southeast Asia in the fall.) k​@Handsome_Hustler_88
13
-
10
-
9
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
Totally agree. Especially in today's economy. Many people have been sold a bill of goods with the idea that the american dream should include home ownership. A home (residence) is a liability, and when you sell it, it merely serves as forced savings.
Do the math. If you live in a home for any reasonable amount of years, and you carry a mortgage. Between the mortgage, increasing property tax and insurance, the interest rate on your mortgage, which sometimes is almost as much as the mortgage, maintenance, upgrades, and major repairs. You're lucky to break even when you sell the home. And if you refinance anywhere along the line, you pay more money because of the closing cost and the fact that your mortgage starts all over again and the interests is once again front loaded. Yes, there were people who bought low in the 70's, 80's and 90's in some markets like California, new York , Texas and Florida and had homes that were worth millions years later. But that is not the case now. That will not be you.
People buying homes now are not going to see that level of increase in value in future years. Homes are vastly over valued now, with increasing costs that you have no control over such as HOAs, property taxes and home insurance. And wages have not kept pace. Some new home owners are going to be underwater for a while, and they better have more money than just enough to "qualify" to buy a home.
Real estate should be an important part of your retirement portfolio, but only when it serves as an investment property with good cash flow. Otherwise, you're going to find that it's just an albatross around your neck, that will keep your firm and join other aspects of life and fully funding your retirement accounts. Nothing wrong with renting for awhile.
​@GuadalupeCamacho-qo1ol
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
You are so right, but people get mad when you say that. I live in Az. I purchased a home with my ex husband in 1992. We sold it at 4X the original purchase price 25 years later. So what! It was not an asset. It was a liability. We spent at least that much in mortgage, interest, property taxes, insurance upgrades and maintenance.
What was actually an investment, was keeping his old house as a rental property. Then, we refinanced our house and purchased 2 other properties. That's when property becomes an asset. When we divorced 2 years ago, we both were able to move into homes that had no mortgage. And, I am now converting a detached garage at my house into a studio apt. This will be a $1000 cash flow. Meanwhile I'm waiting to find the right property for my next investment home. Because I travel so much, my plan is to house hack and live in one part of the house, and rent out the rest of it.
So people need to be clear. Your own residence is not an asset unless you make it work for you.
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
I'm surprised at some of the negative and discouraging comments. People in the US are so ignorant of other countries, and have many negative perceptions about other developing countries-thanks to US propaganda. Relocating to other countries, is not new news-especially in the US black community, which includes working expats and retirees, who have been moving abroad in large numbers for the last decade (Often referred to as the "Black Exodus".) This has been driven not only for the lower cost of living, but also people seeking what they perceive to be a more welcoming, safer, healthy and stress-free culture. There are many, many people who have shared their experiences moving abroad on YouTube and other social media venues and many who have been willing to share their specific costs and expenses. Most provide very "balanced" videos and podcasts about the pros and cons of living in specific countries. Some of the most popular include Mexico, Panama, Costa Rica, Belize, Puerto Rico, DR, Jamaica, Barbados, Columbia, Ecuador, Peru, Portugal, Spain, and France, and for those who don't mind the distance, South Africa, Ghana, the EU, Greece, Indonesia, Malaysia, Vietnam, Thailand, Philippines and South Korea. Don't automatically write off the idea. It's not for everyone, but it is definitely an option-especially for people who can no longer afford to live in the US. (As a younger retiree at 62, I'm currently on a scouting trip in Panama. Mexico in April and Ecuador and Peru in May.)
3
-
3
-
I enjoy following Michael, but I think he's underestimating the impact of high rents. The fact is that the same people who can't afford to purchase a house also can't afford to rent. His example of a friend being able to rent a house that would cost 8 thousand a month for 4 thousand a month, isnt very typical. Most younger people I know,, can't afford 4,000 dollars a month rent. As a home owner who hasn't rented in 35 years, and also a landlord who has had several investment homes over the years, I had no idea that people were not only asking for ridiculous first and last months rents, but also that people demonstrate that they're making 2x or 3x times the monthly rent. Others are requiring a high minimum credit score. Some of these owners are also asking for $300 non refundable application fees! Who can do all that. So the same people that Michael say are renting because it's much cheaper, are literally struggling, and having to choose between eating or paying rent. The so called middle class is being pinched! They can't afford to buy a house. But they also can't afford to rent a decent place in a decent area, unless they can demonstrate that they're making at 80,000 or more. I live in Arizona, and the same house that I was renting for $800 pre-pandemic, I can now easily get 1800/month for. (The house is close to a hospital and a university and those employees can afford that amount of rent.)
I'm so glad to be a boomer who owns their house outright and was able to retire early at 62. I weep for the current generations!😢
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I live in Tucson as well, and I have for over 35+ years. My home is paid for well, with low property taxes and insurance. i recently retired, and I am currently on scouting trips to CR, Panama, Mexico, Portugal, Peru and Equidor this year. I have been renting my home while I travel, and will do so when I move. I will not spend another summer in Tucson! It has become unbearable, and summer never ends. I actually have preferred the humidity and the unexpected bursts of rain in Panama. Tucson is very affordable, but I could live like a queen in Panama or Mexico with the same retirement income, and I don't have to drive 4 or 5 hours to get to a beach.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
A bit surprised to see Greece on the list. I was in Athens and Mykonos in the summer of 2024, and can't think of a single incident of racism or bias.
I'm on many travel facebook groups, and other black travelers have also reported being a "spectacle" in China and other Asian countries, but not necessarily treated in a hostile manner. You just have to get used to people staring and/or taking pictures without asking. But both China and Japan are popular travel destinations and Southeast Asia (Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, Vietnam, and the philippines) is fast becoming a favorite destination of Black expats and retirees.
One thing to keep in mind. Notice how the narrator used "black" and black Africans interchangeably when referring to racist experiences. Black Americans and Black Africans often have different experiences in different countries. One thing I have learned as a black female, is that it is mostly in the US where racist and biased behavior is most often based on skin color". In other countries, it is often based on country of origin. For example, many blacks report initially being slighted or treated poorly when they first arrive in parts of Spain, France and Italy, but as soon as people realized they were "American", the attitude changes. In Spain, their "prejudice" is more likely directed to "black people they believe are from African-like nearby Morocco. I found this to be true when I was traveling through Europe, Ireland and Albania last summer. There would be noticeable changes in people's friendliness toward me, as soon as they heard me talking, or when they asked where i was from. (Though I imagine I also benefit from being on the lighter side)
Finally, I was surprise not to see Australia on the list (instead of Italy or Greece). Many black travelers I know complain about the treatment and reaction of Australians and others avoid traveling there at all. It rarely comes up in discussions on my travel sites and I have not yet seen a single black travel group organize a trip to Australia or New Zealand. But, I will say I have had the opposite experience when I meet Australians while traveling. But, then again, I am American.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
​@emilyfeagin2673 Nobody had to tell me anything. I lived it. We bought a home in 1990's and sold the house 26 years later, for 4X the original cost. But we easily spent that amount on the house during the years we lived there on morgage, interest, taxes, insurance, maintenance, major replacements, like a roof, 2 ac units, and several different upgrades. Owning a home just for the purpose of living in it, did nothing but drain money.
When you buy a house, It doesn't matter if the house is building equity. You can't access that money unless you sell the house or refinance/HELOC. And it takes many years to get your down payment or to have any meaningful equity, because interest payments are so frontloaded.
On the other hand, my husband's house became an asset because we were getting rent much higher than the mortgage. The duplex we subsequently bought was an asset, because we took over payments, and was getting 2x times rent than the mortgage, and was a greater asset when we later sold it to purchase 2 nicer investment homes.
The house we lived was like a forced savings account. If we had rented for the first 10 years instead, we would have been able to buy more investment properties, and then later bought our dream house- in cash.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Retired HR professional here. I can't in good conscience advise this person to go back to school and spend all that money on student loans.
I have an undergraduate degree in personnel management. And i'm probably one of the few people who actually worked in their degree field. I had a very successful 30-year hr career at a major university, though I have to admit my degree didn't really prepare me for the real world of human resources. I had many people ask me why I didn't go back and get a masters. My answer is that I advanced pretty well in my career without one, because I was smart, effective and a good manager.
It's a shame the way salaries have not kept up with living cost for these younger generations.
I agree that he should consider a trade or get a side hustle. But it really is difficult to work 8 hours a day, if you don't like what you do.
If he's 38 and almost broke, that means he probably doesn't have much in the way of retirement investments. So he needs something that's gonna help him catch up.
One of the reasons that I stayed working at the university is because it offered a pension. And despite the fact that people think that pensions have totally gone away, it's not true.
Universities, community colleges and school districts on many states offer a pension. They also usually offer pretty good medical benefits. So do other jobs that we don't think of as "government" jobs, such as post office, public works, airport authority, police officer and firefighter.
The employment outlook doesn't look good for a lot of people, but it's predicted that there will still be government jobs. Now I admit things are up in the air with the new administration, but it's worth it to check out organizations such as universities or state government, where you have a better chance of job security, longevity and pensions or at least a good 401K matching plan.
1
-
This is just another example of why it might be better to rent for well before purchasing a house in today's economy. Many people have been sold a bill of goods with the idea that the "American Dream" should include home ownership. Buying a home in today's economy, will become your "American Nightmare" unless you have significant amount of extra money to support it. A house (residence) is a liability, and when you sell it, it often just serves as forced savings.
Do the math. If you live in a home for any reasonable amount of years, and you carry a mortgage. Between the mortgage, increasing property tax and insurance, the interest rate on your mortgage, which sometimes is almost as much as the mortgage, maintenance, upgrades, and major repairs. You're lucky to break even when you sell the home. And if you refinance anywhere along the line, you pay more money because of the closing costs and the fact that your mortgage starts all over again and the interests is once again front loaded. Yes, there were people who bought low in the 70's, 80's and 90's in some markets like California, new York , Texas and Florida and had homes that were worth millions years later. But that is not the case now. That will not be you.
People buying homes now are not going to see that level of increase in value in future years. Mostly because homes are unaffordable, for a significant portion of the population, and are vastly over valued now. And with increasing costs that you have no control over such as HOAs, property taxes and home insurance, and wages not keeping pace, some new home owners are going to be immediately underwater for a while. They better have more money than just enough to "qualify" to buy a home.
Real estate should be an important part of your retirement portfolio, but only when it serves as an investment property with good cash flow. Otherwise, you're going to find that it's just an albatross around your neck, that will keep your from enjoying other aspects of life, funding your kids education and fully funding your retirement accounts.
There's nothing wrong with renting for quite awhile, until you are beyond "affording" a house.
​@GuadalupeCamacho-qo1ol
1
-
​@Paul_ You said it better than I could. I semi-retired at 54 and completely retired last year at 62. I'm slow traveling through several countries, while i'm still on the younger side. Last year, I was able to visit antigua, panama costa rica, italy, Turkey, Greece, Dublin, London and Albania.
This year, Mexico, Costa Rica (again) Colombia, Ecuador and Peru. Alaskan Cruise in Sept. Then on to Southeast Asian countries. he couldn't be more wrong in thinking that people or cultures are pretty much the same everywhere. There's a reason why thousands of American expats and retirees have moved to other other countries.
1
-
​@Paul_Sleeping what a sad perspective to have. I'm retired at age 62. Last year was Antigua, Panama, Rome, Istanbul, Athens, Dublin, London and Albania. I can most assuredly tell you that people and cultures are not the same and for me traveling and meeting new people and having new experiences is exhilarating .
Beginning in 2 weeks, off to Costa Rica, Columbia, Bahamas, Mexico, Alaska, Dubai, Japan and Bali.
I'm so excited. I can hardly stand it.
To each their own, and if you choose to limit your own experiences, that's certainly your choice. But please don't discourage others based on your own ignorance.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
That young lady is so correct! The american dream of being a homeowner is an illusion. A home is not an asset. It is a long term liability. Unless you purchase a house for cash, you will likely spend more money during the lifetime of living in a home, then you will make when you sell the home. I recently divorced and my ex husband and I sold our home that we had lived in for 27 years. We sold it for more than 4x the original cost. However, the sell price in no way covered all the costs in mortgage, interest, maintenance, upgrades, property taxes and insurance. The only reason that we truly built real estate wealth, was because we held on to my ex- husband's original home and used equity to purchase two additional properties. We had great cash flow and easily paid off the houses and had extra income all those years. This means when we divorced last year, each of us had a home to move into with no mortgage!
We need to stop telling young people that buying a house is a sign of success and wealth building. There are many good reasons to rent - especially in their younger years. It provides better flexibility when you need to change jobs, It's easier to move to a larger place as your family size expands. You'll have more money to invest for retirement and for leisure activities. Don't believe all that hype about how it's just as expensive to rent as it is to pay a mortgage . There's a reason why we call it "house poor". It is really expensive to maintain a home and you have no control over the rising cost of property taxes and insurance. When you rent, all of that is someone else's problem.
Good grief! We need better financial education in 7-12 grades.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
As someone who recently retired after thirty years working in the HR field at a state university, it's a bit humorous to hear some of these complaints. None of it's new. Applicants have always been advised by HR and others that it's easier to get a job when you have one. When employees came to me for advice regarding workplace situations, I always advised them to have a plan and not wait until you're so fed up that you just quit without having a job. It's just a fact of life. An employed candidate is more attractive to a hiring authority than an unemployed candidate. I appreciate that that seems unfair, but this has always been a true fact of life. Also, People who are unemployed tend to display more desperation when they're interviewing. Be prepared to respond confidently as to why you're currently unemployed and why you're being selective about the places you want to work for.
2. People are often told that they're overqualified for job, when the HR or supervisor has some other reason they don't want to hire you. This
is not a new thing.
3. Recent college grads have always had a difficult time entering into their career fields when they don't have practical experience. Again this is not a new phenomenon. This is why college students are always encouraged to take an internship or part time job in the same or similar job to gain parallel experience.
4. HR and hiring authorities have historically been very bad at getting back with candidates or sending generic letters or email. People hate giving bad news, or they want to avoid giving a reason In case it gets them legally in trouble. If you are not selected for an interview, they have no investment in you. Many are not going to afford you the common courtesy of a response. This will never change. When you interview ask when you can expect to hear back one way or the other. After that time passes, send a follow up email or phone call. If you still don't hear back, move on.
5. Signing for a temporary or staffing agency, is not a bad strategy. We hire many people at our university through temporary agencies.
There's a lot of free good job searching advice on the website. I wish job hunters the best of luck.
1
-
1
-
Finally! I've been following Michael for quite a while, and I just came across this video. He is the first person who recognizes that baby boomers are also investors. Every time I watch Youtube videos about the current real estate market, It's clear that the target audience is younger. Yet, Michael hit the nail right on the head. Stop listening to all the silly talk about baby boomers bringing inventory to the market by downsizing. Huh? Why would boomers sell their current homes only to have to purchase an overvalued smaller house at higher interest rates. Or why would we give up something that is bringing us passive income? The youngest baby boomer is 59, and many of us (I'm 62), are retiring early because some of us still have pensions or strong 401K , solid investment accounts, have access to early ss benefits, and many of us held onto our first homes and purchased additional income property. I am single, have substantial equity in my primary residence, and have a second paid-off investment home and a large amount of cash on hand. Since i'm flexible to live anywhere, I'm looking for the opportunity to house hack-possibly in the Las Vegas area. But I live in a college town in Arizona, and the opportunities here are good as well. So yes, for those who are looking for investment opportunities, this boomer is one of your competitors!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I really don't know how you young people are making it now. Much less saving and investing enough to have a good retirement nest egg.
When I started working for the University that I graduated from, making $15,600 in 1991, my ultimate goal was to make six figures. Little did I know that the real value in working 26 years for a public university, was that I would receive a lifetime pension, as well as investing in an IRA.
I'm a young baby boomer that retired last year at age 62. My pension is $70,000 a year and I took early social security that now pays me $25,000 a year. Because I'm worried about possible cuts to social security, I moved $100,00 of my IRA to a lifetime annuity, that pays me $7,000 a year for life. I admit that it gives me some comfort to think that I have six figures a year in guaranteed retirement income. But after taxes, even that's not really as much as it sounds. Thank goodness my house is paid off.
I don't have any children, but I really am sympathetic to what the younger generations are going through. Wages have remained stagnant relative to living expenses for over 20 years.
I'm pretty solid financial-wise, but I'm still scouting out other countries where I can live part or full time. You can live like royalty in places like Mexico, Panama Columbia, Portugal, Spain, Thailand, Malaysia, Vietnam and Phillipines. That may be something that future generations need to consider.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Uh, maybe because the focus of this video was living in other countries on a small pension or social security? The focus was affordability. It is meant to be a starting point for people who might be considering retiring to other countries with lower retirement income. It's up to other people to do their own research and scouting trips to see which countries might meet their other needs and preferences.
I doubt anybody would be expected to make decisions based on this short video. ( I've been to 4 of the countries on the list, and I'd have to say it's pretty accurate. Despite what other naysayers have said, many cities in these countries were significantly more affordable in several areas-including. housing, groceries, transportation, airline flights, non-tourist restaurants, and healthcare.
Panama and Mexico are on top of my list so far. I'll be visiting Portugal, Peru, Columbia and Spain next Spring, and Asian countries the following year.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1