Comments by "Safir Ahmed" (@safirahmed) on "Nomad Capitalist" channel.

America itself has become a nightmare that may cease to exist when many US States wake up.
153
BRICS member countries could in future also have a naughty list to include US, NATO and EU countries.
10
Swans can be more aggressive than ducks.
5
None of the social security benefit cuts claimed by New Labour are necessary and there is no £22 billion black hole. Tax rises are not necessary to fund public services and not necessary to fund government spending. £22 billion is a small amount of government expenditure and the government owned Bank of England could easily use Quantitative Easing to cover any money required to fully fund social security benefits, fully fund winter fuel allowance and fully fund all disability benefits and fully fund all public services in both central government and local government. Quantitative Easing could fully nationalise privatised utilities, telecom and broadband, Royal Mail and bus and rail services with greatly reduced prices for users of these services. Bank of England has previously spent £4 trillion on Quantitative Easing from 2009 - 2022 with £200 billion spent in 2009, most of this money has gone to institutional investors. Quantitative Easing could permanently end austerity. Nigel Farage supports privatisation of public services and deregulation of financial services the same deregulation responsible for the banking crisis and massive bank bailouts of 2008 onwards.
3
New Zealand could be the safest in the South and one of the most remote with modern infrastructure.
2
Yes, a good black marker pen would be easier to read on a whiteboard.
1
@alkriman4182 Yes, some BRICS members have been in territorial disputes with each other for decades and would put those countries on their naughty list for travel.
1
The US had had shown advanced plans created over a long period of time to divide Russia into 41 separate countries based on ethnic lines.
1
@Elena.M11 Google Translation of your previous comment: Different territories of large countries are developed unequally: north, south, west and east. And many economically weak areas exist because of the possibility of migration, including for work, but they send money to their family and allow them to stay there. If you divide, you will get dead cities and entire territories, and in large cities people will live on top of each other and suffocate from carbon dioxide and die at the age of 40 from cancer. My reply: Hopefully BRICS can aid development growth worldwide to reduce inequality and increase lifespan, improve living standards and infrastructure and raise quality of life.
1
@Elena.M11 Google Translation of your reply: Safir Ahmed The United States has divided a bunch of countries over the past 30 years, destroyed many foreign economies, but it turns out they haven’t done anything for their citizens, since today 50 percent of the population cannot cover their expenses with income, and the younger generation no longer sees the point of living. The military-industrial complex does not help citizens live better lives when they are being strangled by the bank credit system. My reply: The US has been at war for almost all of its existence since 1776 apart from a total of 21 years. The situation in the US is bad with inequality and the US debt is so large that only debt forgiveness from the destruction of world war could eliminate US debt of USD $34 trillion. There's US money for foreign wars but no money for its people and millions in the US know this but unfortunately cannot change their government structure.
1
@Elena.M11 Google Translation of your comment: Safir Ahmedwe have no choice but to live, believe and hope. But I don’t see a single country in the world right now that is doing well. For example, I watch here the channels of people from all over the world who advise how to save on this and that, what you can give up for good, and so on. Even if today somewhere they show beautiful pictures of some successful life, we understand that they are just at a certain stage and we already know what will follow, because we have already seen this in other examples or have already gone through it ourselves. Ultimately, the principle must prevail: Live and let others live. My reply: Yes, indeed it's not possible to change structures but it may be possible to prepare by changing one's own mindset and research.
1
It may bd better to avoid countries with issues paying standard bank account customers.
1
@voice.of.reason Try telling that to the millions faced with the choice of heating or eating.
1
UN Agenda 2030 is going to make lives in many developed countries very difficult and intolerable for those who could leave those countries.
1