Comments by "J ay" (@Jay-ho9io) on "LegalEagle" channel.

  1. You were never subscribed.
    5
  2. You were never subscribed
    5
  3. Only he wouldn't get paid.
    3
  4. Explanation starts at 10 minutes. 30 seconds. You think an engineer would be clever enough to figure that out.
    2
  5.  @swordguy5833  The only BS, is the intentional lying of a group of people who are given the direct explanation of the violation of laws committed, their severity and why that resulted in conviction, and like to pretend it's anything other then sufficient. Something happened and you don't like the way it is. That's what you're response boils down to. That doesn't make it a crime, that doesn't make it an accurate, that doesn't make it a conspiracy or "bs." It makes it illegal conviction, 34 times of a crime that actually happened of a thing that people knew was a crime, that you don't like was investigated, tried and the suspect found guilty.
    2
  6. Nah
    2
  7. Nah
    2
  8. Then watch the video.
    2
  9. Yep.. Skill issue.
    2
  10. ​ @OrangeHand  aaaaaand no response. Go figure
    2
  11. ​ @SuperEMT6957 it's nice to want things
    1
  12. Nope. We can disqualify the judges, we can pack the court with more, but we will not ignore it.
    1
  13. So two good things will happen. Great
    1
  14. They are, frequency is a relative statement. And they are more frequent here than they are anywhere else.​ @soundspark 
    1
  15. Nope
    1
  16. So far it's only been applied against upper middle class white people. Makes it first
    1
  17. 10.30 mark. That starts the exact explanation of what specific laws were violated, how and why, and why they are felonies. If you don't understand something , take responsibility for yourself and get educated enough to figure it out.
    1
  18. Watch the video and learn
    1
  19. What exact and specific parts was he wrong about?
    1
  20. 🪛🐍
    1
  21. 🪛🐍
    1
  22. And none of that has anything to do with the case. If you were up with the case, you'd know that.
    1
  23. ​ @rttrttyan You don't need to apologize. That thing knows exactly what it said and it said it to elicit your response. Things like that are the kind of low functioning humans that think that makes them some kind of witty or intelligent.
    1
  24. Object until you're blue in the face. Your inability to understand the law does not create a problem on anyone else's behalf.
    1
  25. It's NDA. And that's not what he was convicted of. At 10 minutes. 30 seconds, a complete explanation of the specific laws he was convicted of, 34 times, is explained. Your failure to be able to comprehend or to admit what you already do know, is not a problem anyone else has to deal with.
    1
  26. Nope.
    1
  27. Die mad about it.
    1
  28. Nope
    1
  29. There would have to be an outstanding order or stricture to be violated before contempt could be cited. You could create a gag order with the expectation that a violation of it could result in contempt.
    1