Comments by "ZA Journals" (@zajournals) on "BBC News" channel.

  1. Agree but he's presumed guilty without a trial and that should not happen to anyone. No matter how it looks (guilty), it is possible he didn't actually sexually assault her. I'll wait for the evidence she must have before I make a judgement. What we definitely know is he made very bad decisions regarding his friendship with them and had to be stupid to not know what was going on. He's never without staff and security people so I'd like to hear what they say about all this. Oh, and his lawyers should never have allowed that interview to happen.
    25
  2. I understand a nation wanting to protect their border. However, countries west of Russia are not a threat, and Russia has no business telling a country they can't join NATO. Since the USA doesn't care about their own southern border, it's hypocritical intervening in another country's border issue.
    19
  3. It's been 2 years since i watched this for the first time. Watching it again now, Andrew himself has convinced me of his guilt
    12
  4. So he's presumed guilty by his own family. THAT sends a clear sign to her lawyers.
    6
  5. You've already decided he's guilty even before a trial, just on speculation, assumptions and accusations. So much for innocent until proven guilty. I'd be surprised if he didn't do something wrong but I'll reserve judgement until substantiated evidence is presented. That's the humanitarian thing to do.
    5
  6.  @markh3279  I haven't heard of any actual evidence that he had sex with her. Clearly he made bad decisions. Thanks for your sharing your thoughts.
    2
  7.  @uzzimaki5722  obviously that's what Russia thinks but I don't think NATO countries have made any threats about invading Russia.
    2
  8.  @uzzimaki5722  having control of Ukraine doesn't change that
    2
  9.  @uzzimaki5722  so if Ukraine doesn't join NATO, the missiles will take a few seconds longer to reach them.
    2
  10.  @uzzimaki5722  I don't think they're going to war over seconds.
    2
  11. I'm very happy for them, but I think I would rather not know.
    1
  12.  @markh3279  multiple women could just be wanting to cash-in to the situation, and that doesn't make someone guilty. Let me get a bunch of people to accuse you of something similar and see how you feel. I'd rather see a guilty man go free than an innocent man imprisoned. The guilty man could be policed. Where did you get that statistic from?
    1
  13.  @markh3279  you aren't alone. Many have already judged him. The queen did what she did because she thinks about the monarchy first. It was a smart thing to do. He has to face the charges as just a man. I simply won't condemn someone on speculation and assumptions.
    1
  14. Gosh I love her. I hope she lives longer than her mother and outlives Charles.
    1
  15.  @SheryAwan123  what exactly?
    1
  16. Off topic... I wonder if Boris wakes up with neatly styled hair and styles it to look like he just woke up, on a windy day. 😛
    1
  17. Wouldn't his security, assumingly always around, and his staff know his whereabouts and goings on, and as such verify or deny what he's saying? This isn't a person that could go anywhere unnoticed.
    1
  18.  @jimmyandersson9938  that never stops lawyers
    1
  19. 👎
    1
  20. Since Russia started a full blown war, instead of just trying to annex some territory, and many world leaders have not been able to get Putin to stop, it's only a matter of time before other countries get pulled into this, more than just sanctions. I don't think Russia can get away with taking down an entire country while the rest of the world watches, and lets him get away with it. What's to keep him from doing the same thing to other countries? The answer to that is, a much bigger war with other countries joining in. Putin has already said he'd go nuclear if that happened.
    1
  21.  @thedonn138  I know exactly what it means and you should have asked that before assuming I didn't.
    1
  22. They might find bits of clothing.
    1