Comments by "nunya" (@nunya54) on ""This Is Bullsh*t!" - Reasons Why The Islamic Faith Is The Fastest Growing Religion" video.

  1. Please learn and do it! It's the only way.
    9
  2.  @TheLionessjudah  Many Christians are leaving Christianity too and in higher numbers. Maybe Christian Prince should focus on Christianity instead. Most Christians know it is nearly impossible to get Muslims (or anyone) to convert to Christianity but what they do instead is try to cast doubt in them about their religion. Those are the worst people to learn from. Pick up a book or find a reputable group on YouTube like DUS Dawah to learn from instead.
    7
  3. That's great! I hope he or she accepts Islam!
    6
  4. The Koran are God's words
    4
  5.  @smidlee7747  No, it's just a lie.
    4
  6. Allah means God in Arabic. Jesus was not before God and Jesus called God Alaha in his language. He also was born and will die.
    3
  7. What type of religion? Not Islam. No, it does not allow pedophilia and Aisha was not a child when she got married.
    3
  8. It's a complete way of life from how individuals live to how governments are run
    3
  9. Never in the history of Islam were they allowed to force people to become Muslim. It's in the Quran. Islam is a complete way of life since it governs the individuals life all the way up to the government. Islam saved Western civilization once before (look it up on YT), it will again.
    2
  10. Judaism is not the foundation of Islam Judaism was was formed by the religious elders from the 6th century BC who authored a new doctrine based upon race, nationality and land that was the foundation. It was a departure from the monotheism (Islam) of Moses which is what is common to Islam. No longer about monotheism but race, nationalism, land and protection of national identity. That is not what Moses or any Jewish prophet before him or after him brought.
    2
  11. What about it?
    2
  12. Islam is the only religion upholding human rights. It's also the only religion with anything authentic in it.
    2
  13. They're not. We just only call Muslims who commit terrorist acts terrorists usually but you can search Christian terrorism and find that too. Every group has terrorists. We just exaggerate and focus in on those who are Muslim now though it is a small percent.
    2
  14. Pedophilia, no. Cousin marriage is allowed. There's no such thing as religious terrorism in Islam. Terrorism is not Islamic. Honor killings are cultural and not Islamic.
    2
  15. People are waking up to the false religion of Christianity; the record numbers apply more aptly to that religion. Some people are leaving Islam due to emotional reasons not logic and not due to anything false. It's the only religion with nothing in it proven false.
    2
  16. Statistics, news reports. Search on YouTube fastest growing religion.
    2
  17. If that were true, there would be nothing left. Islam is the only way and the only truth we have.
    2
  18. Rape was never allowed in Islam and that is not how it spread. Please learn (or re-learn history). They never compelled anyone to become Muslim even when they were conquered by Muslims that is why a small amount of Muslims at one time ruled over 60 percent of the world's Christians and . . . they remained Christian except those who learned the truth and converted. Many people did convert from seeing the superior justice system of Islam and the good treatment they experienced that surprised them, especially compared to how Christians treated people.
    2
  19. According to many Christians on the internet, there are plenty of ex-Muslims, even in the millions, leaving Islam all the time
    2
  20.  @nickpartha8643  It's a complete way of life. So yeah, includes politics too.
    2
  21.  @icxcnika555  No Muslim has a problem with their marriage. People who know history, biology and believe in God understand.
    2
  22. ​ @tabitha72  hi Tabitha, sorry that is not true. The Bible has prophecies of two messiahs. You can still find them in the Bible despite the corruptions and the Jews were very aware of this, the Tribe of Levi in particular which is why they left their lush homelands to go to Arabia. He also did perform miracles. I'm curious where your source is on that because I see people saying this all the time and wonder why. All prophets performed miracles, just like Jesus, some greater miracles than Jesus. Muhammad as well; may. Muslims do not pit prophets against each other though but believe in all of them and know we do not have to pick and choose but we follow the path they were all upon. We simply all have had different prophets and messengers sent to use throughout time from Adam on and Jesus was sent to the lost sheep of Israel during his time as Muhammad was sent as the lost prophet during his time and for the end of time. Muslims do not believe in immoral prophets like those who believe in the Bible do. We believe God only chose the best of mankind to relay his message and they all acted on instructions from God and had the best manners even before revelation. We know the Torah we have today is not what was revealed to Moses as prophets of God do not walk naked, get drunk, sleep with their daughters or any other majorly sinful acts. Neither did Muhammad. He married his adopted son's ex-wife and adopted children in Islam are not like Western modern adoption. It is only a form of charity. The child does not take your name and is not raised as YOUR child. They cannot even be alone with the mother or sisters if they are men and must observe hijab and separation just like any other non-related man or woman. God ordered this specific action because the people of that time would NOT marry those men's ex-wives and that is something God wanted them to do. Taking caring of, providing for women and marrying them is very important in Islam. This marriage as well as others of his were examples for them to follow in marrying widowed or older women, not the women most men seek after first. His marriage to Aisha as well, was on God' s instruction and was not immoral nor abnormal for anyone at that time from amongst the Jews, Christians, Hindus, everyone across the world. When she consummated her marriage at 9, this is within the range that is allowed by God as it is as biological requirement of puberty as when a girl could conceive a child, she was considered a woman, then, by all and in Islam always (this was the same age Christians got married at the time as well). In Islam, women have the right to marry and be provided for when they are physically and mentally ready with their consent and are not restricted to a specific age. As long as these requirements are met, she can decide when to get married. Revolutionary idea I know for some at the time considering how others were treating women (as well as Christians who were at that time debating if women had souls!). Believers in God do not place their subjective opinions over God's legislation. Sure, I know many Christians do that as they adapt away from their religious legislation and Bible and place what they think over what God said, or what other men thought like Paul, but Muslims do not do that. They believe God is the Creator and knows His creation best and that he also knows biology more than anyone and what the future would hold and legislated accordingly. He did not leave us to have to change His laws and figure out the best way and change year after year, century after century. Not sure how Muhammad is dead is a proof against him being a . . . what? Human? All prophets are human and dead or will die like Jesus who Christians claim already died (how can God die?) but the earliest Christians knew he did not die (but he will in the future too after he returns), nor did anyone in the first century believe he died. Jesus was a servant or slave of God and not too proud to be. He also never taught that he was the son of God or God himself. No one during his time or after knew that until the time of Paul when he invented the idea. How can someone be fully two things? Fully God and fully NOT God? Who created that idea?
    2
  23. But nothing in it is proven false. Can't be from Satan. Plus, that would mean Satan is more powerful than God.
    2
  24. There is no oppression under Shariah law. Historically, people preferred Shariah law to other laws. Jews sought refuge under Shariah law in Muslim societies when Christians were coercing and killing them out of existence. Islam spread on its own through the people from seeing the wisdom of Islam, then and today still. It's the only religion that can deal with he problems we have today. Shariah law is good for everyone. More people are starting to wake up and realize this.
    2
  25. Islam is only 1400 years old.
    2
  26. You should read what the disciples and first Christians believed about Jesus so you can truly follow him
    2
  27.  @spaceman77-y2p  No, they did not believe that. The first Christians were Torah-practicing Jews who believed in Jesus as a prophet and messiah, not as God or the son of God. And this was mainstream Christianity in the first three centuries.
    2
  28. True freedom is ONLY in Islam. Everything else is short-term pain (so called freedom) for long-term pain. Don't get caught up in that trick.
    2
  29. Wisdom right there.
    2
  30. Well, that's a good thing but it's also mostly growing in places where religious freedom exists and people are making the choice to follow it.
    2
  31. Both but whatever
    2
  32. They should learn about Jesus from authentic proof but I guess since that does not exist in Christianity, it would have to be from a dream. Where are these stories?
    2
  33. That is a false idea long been debunked by historians. It's a complete way of life that includes politics, yes.
    2
  34. Yeah Muslims don't think their God didn't know the future.
    2
  35. Just like believing God was a baby.
    2
  36. Those things do exist everywhere which is why God legislated against them. He knows humans and what some of them will do. There is no pedophilia in Islam. It seems what you are trying to say is some Muslims practice paedophilia but that would also be false as that is a term that is used subjectively. For example, at what age do you consider a child or not for marriage or consent? Muhammad did not force ANYONE let alone his wife to doing anything like that. Rape was and is never allowed in Islam. Those are lies those who do not know better or who hate Islam come up with just like the Jews said about Jesus being a womanizer and seducer. Aisha was his wife, who wanted to marry him and was a woman at a young age, just like all the women during that time who became women at puberty when they could conceive a child, between the ages of 9-12. He also did not marry his "own son's" daughter. He married his adopted son's daughter at God's instructions to be an example to show these women should be married and not left alone to not be taken care of. Adoption in Islam is not like in the modern West. Children are not adopted and given new names and raised as your own child. It is a form or charity where you take care of the child, they keep their name and lineage; they also do not free mix with the family. A boy would have to observe separation from the women in the family and the women be fully covered around them and the girl would be covered around the male family members and not be alone with them like a normal sibling. There also is no persecution of non-Muslims; a claim often made but not substantiated in history or in the legislation in Islam which requires Muslims to give good treatment to all. This is why people always lived contently in Muslim societies throughout history. This is why the Jews sought refuge in Muslim lands when the Christians were coercing and killing them out of existence. "Beating your wife" is also incorrect as that word is admonish and often misunderstood and is the last step in a series of steps to prevent a disobedient wife from destroying herself and her family. That "beating" is with a miswak (look it up) and does not cause embarrassment or pain but is to call attention to her actions to benefit her, not harm her. Muhammad also does not contradict ANY prophet before him. They are all aligned in their message to worship God alone without partners and shunning idolatry. He only contradicts the lies told in the Bible about evil and immoral prophets, which, I don't know why any of those things would bother a Christian since they claim to believe in prophets who did worse like sleep with their own daughters. If we look at what we can authenticate from the words of Jesus, we find the message of Jesus and Muhammad to be the same. Muhammad fulfills the requirement laid out in the Bible to be taken from as a prophet and prophesizes of him exist in the Bible, at least in ten places. False prophets more likely refers to the founder of Christianity, Paul as false prophets were always revealed in short time and Paul was refuted by the righteous followers of Jesus, like James and Jude in their epistles and considered a heretic and apostate of the law. False prophets were always revealed in short time. Muhammad has been a prophet for over 1400 years and nothing he's said has been proven false.
    2
  37. Reproducing is a way to grow.
    2
  38. It's 2023, most intelligent people know those things are not true of Muhammad. Please learn more to benefit yourself. There was no and never has been allowed to abuse or RAPE anyone. There were no such things as "sex-slaves" Those are things people either misunderstand or make up since they can't actually criticize the foundations of Islam. They look for strange obscure things they think they can twist but those things are not true. Muhammad was the leader of a nation, like Moses and all leaders of nations fight wars. They also fought some of the most bloodless wars in history. Warmonger is inappropriate though if we're calling him that, we're calling all leaders of nations that. There also was no pedophilia and since you mentioned the Bible, you should be aware Judaic Law in it that allowed girls to marry at age 12 (and 1 day) which by most people, who go by men's ideas instead of God's, would also be considered paedophilia today. That would be the law Jesus followed and supported and said he came to uphold. Consummation of marriage in Islam (and Christianity) was only allowed at puberty, when a girl was physically and mentally mature; so, no, No pedophilia (which anyone who knows history knows that is when Jews and Christians got married too). Jewish girls married between 12-13. All girls around the world married between 9-12. No, she was never impregnated but not sure why that would be a problem. That was his wife. Sounds like that is from the prudish ideas of Paul instead of Jesus whose ideas led to monasticism which lead to sexual abuse. No, he did not equate black people to animals. Again, one of those false claims. As you noted, he was buying the slaves to FREE them. Islam was a religion of freeing slaves, not acquiring them. Something clearly known by people who actually read the Quran and the hadith.
    2
  39. Interesting. Never heard that. Which sect or kind of Muslim? Most people I know that (really) become Muslim say they do so because Islam just makes sense. If they come from Christianity, even more so.
    2
  40. People absolutely deep down do NOT know Jesus is the God of truth. People deep down do not believe God ever became a baby and could die on a cross.
    1
  41. They want everyone to be saved like them. It's also pretty impossible to convert a Muslim to another religion. Christians learned that long ago that is why they focus instead on causing Muslims doubt in their own religion so they become Muslim in name only, rather than becoming Christian.
    1
  42. Other people evolve and adapt away from their religion, their God's legislation (though none of them actually have God's revelation) but not Muslims who may be sinful and move away to a degree but their legislation will never evolve and be corrupted. If you spend five minutes with anything, you haven't learned enough and is what someone would say if that is all the time they invested but anyone who really reads and studies would know the opposite. Bible determines
    1
  43.  @Nagamatoishuzen  Which most Christian scholars do not believe John or any other apostle said (begotten son).
    1
  44. That is not what Jesus taught.
    1
  45.  @goodshorts  ​ It's the only truth we have. Please study Christianity and Islam and you will see. It is the truth Jesus believed in and followed. Jesus was the way and the truth in his time to his people he was sent just like all prophets in their time to who they were sent to. Follow Jesus as the truth to God and worship God alone; don't worship Jesus.
    1
  46. Most destructive religion in history . . . Christianity?
    1
  47. "Educated" is subjective. Sadly, if they are educated in the Western way, this might be true but it would be taking them away from logic and the natural inclination God created us upon to know who God is and to want to worship Him. Many people get "educated" away from this sadly. NO one reads the Quran and says it is ungodly though, unless, of course, they find the Bible and every other religious book ungodly as well which we would be odd since those are the only books claimed to be from God.
    1
  48. Christians claim to love everyone and they are also lax in their belief system; they also have adapted away from their book and claimed revelation. So why not adapt more? For example, the Bible says adulthood is at 12/13 but they have changed that age over time, subjectively, when men change their minds. If they can change their mind about what they claim God said, then they can change their mind about same-sex marriage as well, or at least that is what some people think. And as many of them say about coming to Church, "come as you are." Muslims do not claim to love everyone and everything. Muslims are required to love what God loves and hate what God hates. They are also required to give people good treatment. So they should not be killing or mistreating anyone unjustly. Vigilante murder is not allowed in Islam. They can give people their rights though while hating their evil but if God lays down a law against a certain action, Muslims will believe in that. Islam means to submit to God in worshipping Him alone and shunning idolatry and Muslims believe God knows best His creation. So if he says homosexuality is bad, then they know allowing them to have sex or get married is not only harmful to those individuals but harmful to society as well. For God only allows what is good and forbids what is evil and harmful to people. God is merciful like that. But when you come from a faulty religion such as Christianity (created by men and not from Jesus), then you will be wishy-washy, you will not be clear on what you stand on (did Jesus die for your sins or not? IF he did, why do your sins matter?) and you will sway with the wind. They have been loose with other things, why not that as well. Are they calling out the evil sin of interest/usury? Are they calling out the rampant fornication and adultery? They're really not even calling out the clergy abuse in their religion.
    1
  49. Islam actually does not mistreat anyone; abuse is not allowed in Islam. What type of mistreatment have you seen of women and homosexuals? Slaves in Islam were only acquired during battle as an alternative to killing the people, starving them in camps, etc and they were encouraged after to free them. Muslims submit to God and believe He is the Creator and knows His Creation best. What He commands is good for people and what he prohibits is because it is bad for people. Imposing those laws on people like against harmful acts, is good for all people, whether they like it or believe so or not. Muslims are also required to love what God loves and hate what God hates and they do not love bad behavior and actions that harm individuals or humanity and they love what will benefit individuals and humanity. With superior moral laws, their societies are more peaceful, safe and secure than those that allow "freedom" of people to do what they want. This is an example of a culturally tight society.
    1
  50. Plural marriage is allowed in Christianity. Always was.
    1
  51. Many people find the Bible misogynistic. Two women being equal to one man has to do with witnessing financial transactions and is due to memory loss and brain restructuring and changing in women due to the many changes they go through with puberty, menstruation, childbirth, breastfeeding, menopause, etc. The issue of memory being confirmed by modern science testifying to the truthfulness of this legislation
    1
  52. Worshipping Jesus is just as bad as worshipping Mary. He's not God.
    1
  53. May be true. Muhammad prophesized that Muslims would follow the way of the Jews and Christians handspan by handspan.
    1
  54. They are accepting the nature of Islam by accepting Islam. People who believe in God and believe their religion is from God do not see God's ideas as being restricted to a time period, as if their God did not know what would be in the future. I guess who reform their religions and adapt away from what they believe God said do though; that would be a faulty understanding or weak belief in God.
    1
  55.  @smidlee7747  That is very similar to what Christians say about Christians who become Muslim. They were never Christian to begin with. It also is similar to many Christians saying Catholics are not real Christians.
    1
  56. It's also conversions.
    1
  57.  @smidlee7747  Does this also apply to the predictions in the Bible and all the other predictions in the Quran and Hadith?
    1
  58.  @smidlee7747  The Old Testament had sinful prophets. It's not the Torah revealed to Moses.
    1
  59. It's not okay for them to kill non-Muslims at all.
    1
  60. Interesting. There seems to be way more propaganda against Islam than Christianity. Just the fact that no one says Christian terrorism and most people think it's exclusive to Islam seems to be just one sign. I think people are learning now to not give Muslims heat because Islam is growing and people are speaking up and people are also equally or perhaps more NOW speaking against Christians because of obvious problems in the religion or the adherents to it.
    1
  61. But Islam is right all the time. All the time, Islam is good. Islam is good, all the time.
    1
  62. How exactly is poverty growing it?
    1
  63. If you mean female genital mutilation FGM, that is Christian practice done in mostly Christian majority countries.
    1
  64. Those verses of violence were specific during a time of battle. The Quran was revealed over a 23-year period in real time to events that were happening to Muhammad and his followers. The verses speaking about killing disbelievers were when those disbelievers were trying to kill them. It's not a general verse for all time, clearly, as even when Muslims ruled over many disbelievers, like when a small number of Muslims ruled over about 60 percent of the world's Christians, they clearly did not kill them all. It was also the Jews who sought refuge in Muslim lands when the Christians were coercing them out of their religion or killing them almost out of existence. There is no general command or encouragement to use violence against non-believers.
    1
  65. Christians scholars do not believe John ever used the words "begotten son'. Look into it.
    1
  66. The Western religions are not practical. Islam is.
    1
  67.  @haroldotieno5804 Which Muslim countries exactly keep other people from practicing their religion?
    1
  68. Where did the Taliban invade and force people to convert? Forced conversions are not allowed in Islam.
    1
  69. I'm not sure any Biblical scholars says the Bible is the word of God anymore.
    1
  70.  @jesusisthetruth4131  The Bible is not the Word of God. They are not sure whose word it is but they know it's not God's. God does not make mistakes or send a corrupted, contradictory book with historical inaccuracies, mix up characters, get genealogies mixed up, etc.
    1
  71. ​ @jesusisthetruth4131  The Quran is the inspiration and actual word of God, revealed by the Angel Gabriel to the prophet Muhammad ﷺ. In the Quran we find the phrases like "I am your Lord, worship me," or the form "Say", God telling Muhammad ﷺ exactly what to say (a prophecy of Moses); whereas in the Bible we find the forms "I heard God say" or "God said" or the personal greetings between the writers. These are thoughts and ideas of the men who wrote the Bible, through history and experience as Christian scholars say. Not so the Quran.
    1
  72.  @jesusisthetruth4131  The Bible being corrupted, being known to be written by anonymous individuals is not a Muslim belief. It is a fact, established by Rabbis and Biblical scholars. Why would we say the Bible with all the mistakes is from God? Who would believe and say God sent a book with contradictions and mistakes? What a fauly thinking of God. Dr. W Graham Scroggie of the Moody Bible institute, Chicago, one of the most prestigious Christian evangelical missions in the world says about the Bible in his book “It is human, yet divine”: “...Yes, the Bible is human, although some out of zeal which is not according to knowledge, have denied this. Those books have passed through the minds of men, are written in the language of men, were penned by the hands of men and bear in their style the characteristics of men....” Another erudite Christian scholar, Kenneth Cragg, the Anglican Bishop of Jerusalem, says in his book, “The call of the minaret”: " . . . Not so the New Testament . . . There is condensation and editing; there is choice reproduction and witness. The Gospels have come through the mind of the church behind the authors. They represent experience and history . . . ” Who says the Bible is the word of God anymore?
    1
  73.  @jesusisthetruth4131  You don't care what Jesus said?? Or what Biblical scholars say? Take care of yourself.
    1
  74.  @jesusisthetruth4131  Please study your religion and ask God to guide you.
    1
  75.  @tabitha72  ​ Yep, there sure are two and the Jews, you know, who Christians took part of their book from, were very aware of this which is why they left their lush homeland for the harsh deserts of Arabia to look for him, the Tribe of Levi in particular. Why do you think the Jews were in Arabia to begin with? Where do you think Mount Paran, Teima or Teiman is? The Ahmad of all nations, the unlettered prophet with the fiery new law, who fought the sons of Kedar with 10,000 saints who was like unto Moses but from outside of Israel, from the vision of Isaiah of the chariot of camels, the burden of Arabia? Not Elias? Not Jesus? Not THAT prophet? Why do you think there are prophecies that don't fit Jesus or Moses or anyone else but DO fit Muhammad? So one would have to concede, they are Muhammad, they are someone we are still waiting for (like the Jews are and they actually knew and rejected Muhammad because he was an Arab), or the prophecies don't make sense and are pointless but that would not be the first time prophecies in the Bible are not based in anything. God Himself created that idea, to be fully God, and fully human yet there is no evidence of God saying this anywhere. Jesus’s other disciples who never met Jesus. They wrote those ideas but they did not know or follow Jesus nor were their gospels circulating during his time. No one even knows who the gospel writers are. What were their full names? No one knows who John is and scholars are pretty sure now John, Matthew, Mark, Luke are not even who wrote the gospels and from their style, it was probably many authors who did. Who were they? Who is telling you Jesus is God? It certainly isn't Jesus and it certainly isn't God. Christian do not believe that God is a trickster or fraud but they do believe God will kill his own son or kill himself, commit suicide? And they also believe God sends delusions in the Bible. They think Jesus thought God had forsaken him, caused him to die a humiliating death, walked through the streets naked, nailed to a cross, left to be eaten by vultures and ultimately disintegrating? Then, after being arrested as a rabble rouser and killed buried in a tomb like he was noble? Come on. And this is with all the other evidence against the story and the evidence that no one believed Jesus was God or died during the time he was on earth or even in the first century! Why do you think there were three schools of thought about Jesus? Why were the Christians fighting bloodily over who Jesus was? Why did the Church have to call the councils and DECIDE who he was? This count NOT be because the scripture was clear, right? Because you don't think God has the ability to trick the evil people trying kill Jesus but would rather than him save Jesus, have him kill him instead? Again, Jesus did not say he was dead and resurrected. WHO exactly said that Jesus said that? Who wrote Revelations, who wrote John? And before any of that how can God be Ever Living and temporarily die? This is incarnation, a pagan belief. Those who try to impose that Bible is corrupted, they are either ignorant or evil. So your scholars are evil and ignorant? Since no Biblical scholar can say the Bible is NOT corrupted? People attack the Bible because IT IS NOT TRUE. If the Bible is God's book, and he is able to protect it, why are so many parts corrupted? You do NOT have the Torah, Zabur and Injeel. You have an assumption of the Torah, an assumption of the Zabur and the Gospel of many men. The Quran is not speaking about those book we have today. It is speaking about the Torah revealed to MOSES. Not the book you have today called the Torah that the Rabbis don't know who wrote but the Bible says came through the hands of evil and wicked Israelites who would kill their prophets, bring shame on their faces, provoke God to anger and CHANGE THE SCRIPTURE. Whatever God tells them to do, they go against it. Whose testimony are you taking? The Injeel is the Gospel of JESUS and any Christian will tell you, we do not have the Gospel of Jesus. You can go wherever you like Tabitha. Trust me it's been 1400 years and no claims against Islam have been substantiated. Perhaps there are a some things you misunderstand and need clarification on. Send the issues you have and if I can, I will respond to them but I am curious about your take on the Bible so I will send a second message so this is not too long . . .
    1
  76.  @tabitha72  Two early papyri, which overlap across seventy verses of John's Gospel, differ at no less than 70 places (after obvious scribal errors) An average of one variation each verse. If they were being changed to such a degree, even a gap of a century between and original and its first survival is long and potentially disastrous. We simply do not know what may have happened to the words at important places (Robin Lane Fox, The Unauthorized Version, 1992, 139-140) Why were the New Testament authors unable to reproduce accurately the texts they needed from the Old Testament? And are these inaccuracies compatible with a work that claims for itself Divine inspiration? Why were the gospel writers unable to produce accurately the texts they needed from the OT if they had Divine Inspiration? Only one statement is true Psalm 40:6-7 reads: 'Sacrifice and offering thou didst not desire; mine ears hast thou opened: burnt offering and sin offering hast thou not required. Then said I, Lo, I come: in the volume of the book it is written of me.' Paul reproduces this passage in Hebrews 10:5-7: 'Sacrifice and offering thou wouldst not, but a body thou prepared me: In burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin thou hast no pleasure. Then said I, Lo, I come (in the volume of the book it is written of me) to do thy will, O God.' The misquote is clear. Peake's Commentary says (p.896): "As usual the writer (Paul) quotes from the Septuagint which reads 'but a body hast thou prepared me' instead of 'mine ears thou hast opened' as in the Hebrew version." Henry and Scott's compilers have said: "This is a mistake of the scribes. Only one of the two statements is true." 'Then was fulfilled what had been spoken by the prophet Jeremiah, saying, And they took the thirty pieces of silver, the price of him on whom a price had been set by some of the sons of Israel...' This excerpt turned out to be one of Matthew's best known mistakes. The statement he ascribes to Jeremiah is not found anywhere in the Old Testament Book of Jeremiah. A passage similar to it, however, is found in Zechariah 11:13. Horne observed in his Bible commentary (Vol.2/pp.385-386): "Some scholars think that it is an error of Matthew's version and the copier wrote Jeremiah instead of Zechariah; or it may be a later addition." Another of Matthew's famous errors is found in his Gospel at 2:23: 'And he came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, He shall be called Nazarene.' This prophecy is not found in any of the books of the prophets in the Old Testament. Manfred, a Catholic scholar, wrote in his The Questions of the Question: "The books which contained this description have been destroyed, because in any of the present books of the Prophets we do not find the statement that Jesus would be called a 'Nazarene'." Mark's Gospel highlights again the concern about the New Testament authors' insufficient knowledge of the Old Testament. He states in his Gospel 2:25-26: 'Have ye never read what David did... How he went into the house of God in the days of Abiathar the high priest, and did eat the shrew bread.' This is incorrect because the high priest at the time of this incident was not Abiathar but rather Ahimelech, as can be seen in the Old Testament at I Samuel 21:1. Therefore, Peake's Commentary says (p.684): "The reference to Abiathar is a mistake." How can God inpsire these contradictions. When was this the true word of God and when was it not, in Samuel or in Mark's Gospel? The Book of Joshua According to investigation the book appears a medley of contradictory narratives, most of which are un-historic. Peake's. II Chronicles 29-32 "The Chronicler in the long section writes, from his own point of view, much that is quite un-historical . . . it is probably that another source (or witness?) was utilized by the Chronicler but he himself is evidently responsible for many of the variations. How can un-historic books be from God? Commenting on Judges chapter 17 and 18 it states (p.269): "In not a few places the text has evidently been tampered with by scribes, who took offence at practices which were from a later point of view irregular." In its commentary to I Samuel 2:3 we read (p.275): "These verses do not make sense; the present wording cannot be the original one, but must be due to mistakes in the copying. We cannot now discover the original form." I Samuel, this time against verse 14:18, it says (p.288): "The introduction of the Ark in I Samuel 14:18, is due to a corruption of the text." Page 292, commenting on II Samuel 23:4-7, it states: "The text and translation of the last line, and of 5-7, are uncertain; there is no agreement amongst scholars as to how they are to be restored." Commenting on Ezra 4, verses 6 and 7 (p.327): "These are two stray verses which have been left in the text here by mistake. This offers a good example of the way in which fragments of sources are jumbled together in our book... Scholars have suggested a number of solutions, but they differ from each other considerably." In the introduction to the Book of Hosea, we read (p.534): "As will be apparent from the notes, the text is in places very corrupt. We must often resort to conjectural emendation, and reach only a possible approximation to the original text." Commenting on Zechariah 6:9-15, it says: "The text is considerably confused, partly through accident, partly it would seem by deliberate alteration." 'All this took place to fulfil what the Lord had said through the prophet: The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel.' (Matthew 1:22-23) This prophecy is found in the Old Testament at Isaiah 7:14. Matthew sees in this a referral to Mary (the virgin) and Jesus (a son called Immanuel). Unfortunately, when Christians initially quoted these old prophecies, they used Greek translations which were untrue to the Hebrew originals. This passage is a prime example. There is no mention of a virgin in the original prophecy, the Hebrew word for which is bthulah. The word in the prophecy (which Matthew and other Christians render as virgin) is the Hebrew word almah which signifies a young woman, maiden or damsel of marriageable age. The error no doubt was made by a translator during the copying of Isaiah into Greek and Matthew, unaware of the original Hebrew, merely followed the translated wording. Does God have issues with translations?? Peake's Commentary on the Bible correctly states: "The rendering 'virgin' is unjustifiable." A look at the context of the Prophecy in Isaiah (7:1-17) helps to give a correct understanding of the intended meaning: Ahaz, the king, was in danger, his enemies were pressing hard against Jerusalem. Revelation is sent to Isaiah as consolation to Ahaz and as a sign that his enemies would not prevail against him. The sign of their destruction would be that a 'young woman' would bring forth a son and before the child had grown up their kingdoms would be vanquished . . . and we can keep going and going and going. So is this divinely inspired or not? Is this from God or not? How do you reconcile this?
    1
  77.  @tabitha72  ​ Nah, not my mission. Anyone who reads and studies the Bible will undoubtedly find the errors. It doesn't have to be a mission. It just is. I had no idea it was so many though. There is some truth in the Bible but it's just too much otherwise that isn't for it to be considered the word of God or an authority of truth or the standard of it. Yes and everyone who studies Muhammad and Islam will also find nothing in it proven false. These are not my personal opinions Tabitha. This is just the reality of the books we have today called the Quran and the Bible that were well-established before our time. It's been over 1400 years for Islam, 2000 for Christianity. These books and the information are not new. It is just on us to find out and then decide, what we are going to base our belief system on after that. Some people choose authenticity; some people do not care and prefer a blind faith of their forefathers (usually). I would welcome objections and I have plenty of times but no one has yet to be able to explain those problems in the Bible. I am not even sure most people have the time. But why would I need that from a person I don't know on the internet when I could just learn from Christian scholars themselves? The information is not hidden for either of these religions. It's easy to find which is what makes me curious as to why most Christians, if they DO know, still choose to believe in Christianity? You can't argue the point someone stays INTENTIONALLY blind when they are only going off of facts and evidence. Especially when that evidence is from Christendom itself. Educating yourself is the opposite of staying blind. Believing what someone told you without even finding out WHO told you is staying blind. Presenting facts that you do not know or do not want to accept or agree with also is not arguing. I am not here to argue about anything. Just present what I know that I thought someone else might not know; to try to shed light on some falsehoods that exist to help guide you to the truth but only God guides. To leave you, let us be clear that I presented evidence from Christian scholars of issues in the Bible that are NOT just translation errors but you blindly excuse them as being a few when there are many and you make it seem as though they are just translation errors when none I sent were about that (what I sent was the gospel writers having problems connecting to the Greek translations of the Hebrew Torah, a problem they should not have if they are being inspired by God) and for many different reasons. That is your choice to do so but that is the definition of being blind. Those beliefs are definitely affected when you do not even know who said them. I know the Lord, like Jesus knew the Lord. You choose to follow the Lord based on Matthew, Mark, Luke, John and Paul rather than what can be found that Jesus said himself and you, nor anyone can never answer the simple question of what their full names even were. It's your choice, of course. To you be your religion and to me mine. You can follow Paul and those men and their ideas and we will follow Jesus in his and worship God like he did. Learn about who you really follow because Jesus never said he was God, never said he was the son of God, never worshipped himself or told anyone else to and HE worshipped God, not himself. And this you can find in your own religious history. You don't have to take my word on ANY of this. Learn for yourself! I hope you do. Take care.
    1
  78. There is no paedophilia being practiced "in the name of Islam" because paedophilia is not allowed in Islam. If you mean marriage to women who are young, that is not paedophilia if those women have reached puberty. Puberty is adulthood in Islam. We also can't act like the church is not known for actual paedophilia. I'm pretty sure they don't abuse children in the name of Christianity.
    1
  79. And conversions
    1
  80. Not according to most or maybe half the Christians on YT. Apparently it's a wave of apostasy with millions of Muslims leaving Islam. But we can also look at research and anecdotally (just search on YT about Islam fastest growing religion) and we can see that many people are accepting Islam in countries we don't expect. As far as it being rooted in truth and steadfastness, I think some people would disagree as many believe truth always prevails over falsehood and they believe in certain signs and standards laid down by God to know if a religion is true or not that Islam actually follows, even for people who don't want to admit or submit to it.
    1
  81. There is no such thing as child marriage in Islam, that "beating" is not like you think, there was no such thing as slavery sex and with animals and the dead? No one believes that ridiculousness.
    1
  82.  @986najes8  No, you are. You will not find any of that in Islamic law. Sounds more like Judaic law found in the BIble.
    1
  83.  @986najes8  There was no force, not in ANY sexual relationship. Those relationships were with consent and no one believes any religion from God would condone rape. Please.
    1
  84. Pray to God Abraham. Jesus is not God and never said he was. He also did not say he died for our sins and neither did God. That was an invention by men. Please learn more about this reality. Interesting name. Two names of people quite aware that Islam was the truth. Abraham and the Tribe of Levi, they were distinctly aware of the prophecy of Muhammad which is why they went to Arabia.
    1
  85. The verses in the Quran about killing non-Muslims was not general for all times. The Quran was revealed over a 23-year period in real time to events that were happening and those verses were for specific times the non-Muslims were trying to kill THEM and they were supposed to fight back. It is not an indiscriminate command for all times. Muslims are required to love what God loves and hate what God hates but they also have to give people good treatment even if they don't agree with their beliefs or actions. They can hate that Jews reject God's prophets or that Christians worship Jesus instead of God, but that does not mean they can mistreat them or kill them. Which is clear from history since Muslims ruled over many people and never killed them all or forced them to convert (dissimilar to the Christians).
    1
  86.  @irritatedtv168  Show me an atheists and I'll show you an emotional person.
    1
  87. Christianity preaches too many contradictory things. If Jesus is God and taught love and forgiveness as a human, he certainly didn't as God in the Old Testament.
    1
  88.  @brohocha  Reading the Bible, studying it more only reveals more and more problems within it. How do you reconcile the angry God of the OT with Jesus? This is an issue Christians have had problems reconciling for years as well as many of the other teachings since they're so confusing and contradictory.
    1
  89. It seems it would be the opposite.
    1
  90.  @balmerfortuna9694  True so I hope everyone actually follows EVIDENCE. That's the key.
    1
  91. Muslims are also just Western (not infiltrating).
    1
  92. Faith in Islam is based on love, fear and hope. Not just fear though fear is essential too. I dk anything about fear of being attacked for being different. You'd have to be more specific what law that is in Islam or is that something people are doing. No one is allowed to attack or kill anyone indiscriminately in Islam. It sounds like you're talking about vigilantism which doesn't exist in Islamic law.
    1
  93. Who was Muhammad's brother? False, Muhammad was a not a molester of anyone and did not sleep with a little girl. HIs wife was a woman at 9 when she reached puberty. This is the same age everyone got married during that time; Christians, Jews, Hindus, etc.
    1
  94. Hey, why not get a clue? You might learn it IS a good thing!
    1
  95.  @Faladaena  You have a heartfelt aversion to worshipping God alone?
    1
  96. There is no pedophilia in Islam, "wife beaters" is a misnomer that requires better understanding and is not as you say or think it is and violence is only legislated as needed by God for the good of people and society.
    1
  97. The West does way more than "adjust" when coming to Muslim countries. They do far more nefarious things to try to change those countries to BE like the West.
    1
  98. And hopefully they will worship God alone instead of Jesus. The devil is more pleased with that than anything else.
    1
  99. It's not insulting. They are only clarifying truth from falsehood. I can see why people think that is insuting but if they learn as well, they will see clearly too.
    1
  100. Human rights is a term that is not universally defined and is ironically used by some countries who are well known for going against true human rights while policing the rest of the world on what they should be doing with human rights. Human rights according to Muslims are from God. Human rights according to other people are the ever-changing subjective opinions of the men in control at the time. Everyone not Muslim is going to Hell according to God, not according to Muslims.
    1
  101. Which Muslims forced their beliefs onto others?
    1
  102.  @hendrix6944  When did they FORCE their beliefs? You are saying they forced those people to become Muslim? That is very different than people coming under their laws as the governing force.
    1
  103. That is not true. Religious minorities actually prefer living under Islamic rule than any other rule historically. Ask the Jews how Islam saved them from being almost wiped out by the Christians.
    1
  104. Muslims aren't supposed to vote in democratic elections.
    1
  105. Most have no reason to leave though. Hard to deny generational wealth
    1
  106. Yes, others are allowed to follow their own beliefs in Islamic societies. They always have been. They have the same freedoms as anyone else in the society except to openly call to their faith but Muslim as well are not allowed to go out and openly call to whatever they want in Muslim societies as well. A kaafir is a disbeliever. What's wrong with using clear wording to describe who people are? Those are God's words, not Muslim's
    1
  107.  @arjung3423  Sounds like your ideas about the Muslim world come from the media and ignorant content creators. People who know the Muslim world, love it and would love to live in most of the countries as Islamically run countries experience more peace, safety and security than non-Muslim ones. That is understandable, media has been lying for years about these countries. Muslims attacking non-Muslims is a false idea people teach who do not know the Quran or the reality of Muslim countries. There is no legislation in Islam that allows for non Muslims to be attacked indiscriminately and non-Muslims have always enjoyed living in Muslim lands. It was the Jews who sought refuge in Muslim lands when the Christians were coercing and killing them almost out of existence. Muslims ruled over at one time sixty percent of the world Christians. The Muslim world is a large place and many countries and many non-Muslims love to or would love to live those places.
    1
  108.  @arjung3423  Calling someone a kaafir because they don't believe in Islam is not a double standard; it's just an accurate statement by God. God makes the rules, not us. Equality and justice is based on what God says, not you, me, the West or what anyone else says. Yes, other faiths are doing just fine in some Islamic countries. Iraq is one place and Muslims have not always been able to practice their faith openly in the West; in fact some things, they cannot practice as it's not allowed by law or they are made difficult to do but the West has liberal attitudes and laws, so why should they not include allowing people to practice their religions freely?
    1
  109. Worldly reasons. They shouldn't though except for certain necessary reasons because the West is harmful.
    1
  110. It's both.
    1
  111. False. There is no compulsion to convert in Islam.
    1
  112. Interesting use of the word breeding. That would be good either way, growing, breeding . . . the more Muslims, the better the world.
    1
  113.  @truthseeker4579  Not true at all and anyone who knows or studies history, knows this is not true. Look up what historians say about Islam and how it saved Western civilization. That is a lie we've been told about Islam. It simply isn't true. Wake up . . . the truth is becoming more and more clear to everyone which is why Islam is growing. Be a true truth seeker before it's too late.
    1
  114. Yeah, Muslims actually follow what their book and God say; so they benefit like that. @Ash_Queen16 
    1
  115. People love living in Muslim majority area. Censorship is good when it is against evil stuff.
    1
  116.  @peasant7214  Sure there is. It's not called censorship but it is. Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information. This may be done on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient". There are rulings in Islam where certain speech and other information or objectionable material is not allowed. That's not a bad thing though as some would think; it's actually good.
    1
  117. What religious tyranny would that be? It wouldn't be Islam since Islam is not based on slavery or violence but it does govern individual life and government.
    1
  118.  @bestwishes2455  None of that is bad, according to God. Only to people with their own subjective opinion's. Although most would disagree on creativity, personal freedom and tribal thinking as none of those are discouraged in Islam as long as they are within the legislations of Islam. Whatever is NOT allowed is because is harmful to the individual or society and what is allowed and encouraged is because there are no problems with that. Everyone has personal freedom, even to do evil and go against their religion which is why rules and laws, punishments, etc exist in the first place. Freedom to choose to follow those rules and laws, or not (and suffer the consequences or gain the rewards from that).
    1
  119. It's also due to conversions which many people can see firsthand as well.
    1
  120. You can be an atheist in an Islamic society. You just can't go around calling people to that illogical emotional belief.
    1
  121.  @haruspex1-50  Nudists can't wall around naked everywhere they want to go. NAMBLA can't openly have relationships with little boys. People can't go around killing who they want. You can't be "free" anywhere Haruspex or rather, you ARE free to do what you like and suffer the consequences.
    1
  122. Please learn about Islam. Many Mexicans are becoming Muslim.
    1
  123. Muslims prefer to follow God's legislation than their own "thoughts" because they know God is their Creator and knows HIs creation best. They also do not have a concept like some other people that their God did not know what the future would hold and legislate accordingly. As for people who do not believe in God or are of weak faith, they might think otherwise.
    1
  124. Muhammad ﷺ predicted that.
    1
  125. He was not a pedophile. Are all the religions cults or just Islam?
    1
  126. They have churches and temples in Muslim countries, even in the Gulf States and Arab countries (the smaller percentage of Muslims); have for many years. Perhaps you're thinking of a small number of places? Most people when speaking about the Muslim world really only mean three countries. The Muslim world is much larger than that.
    1
  127. The Prophet prophesized that Muslims would follow the Christians and Jews handspan by handspan. So if not already, they probably will the main difference is though, that they have the original sources of their religion still in tact; so they are not as confused as other religions are or have a hard time connecting back to their revealed message. They are, as some say, the last stronghold against ___ (enter modern ill/problem).
    1
  128. Diversity is fine as long as it is within the limits that God sets. Otherwise it would be against humanity and not good for people. Who are the least breeding religion? Breeding is an odd term.
    1
  129. They enforce law through some violence which is necessary, as God says.
    1
  130. They can but most don't. Also, every other religion can have plural wives too.
    1
  131. You can marry a cousin, yes but you cannot marry your aunt or uncle. Betrothal can happen earlier, like 6 but MARRIAGE (consummation) can only happen after puberty, legal responsibility in Islam and is not at a set age. It's a biological age at which a child can now conceive a child and is an adult, when they're mentally mature and they're ready (for marriage, with their consent). There is no evidence Islam is sick and of the devil. That makes absolutely no sense. What makes you even think that?
    1
  132. Islam had slavery only through battle and conquest; prisoners of war with the goal of freeing them and the alternative being to kill them or leaving them to starve to death
    1
  133. Good. More young people need to get married instead of having sex and the problem will only get worse with all the sexual stuff schools are teaching and exposure to sex on the internet.
    1
  134. Never in the history of Islam has anyone who ever studied it, even those who hate it ever said that. It's nothing but wisdom and truth. Get into it and study for real.
    1
  135. Islam was not a religion of slavery. That would be more apt to Christianity. Islam was a religion of freeing slaves, not acquiring them. Christians misinterpreted the Bible to support slavery, not Muslims.
    1
  136. Islam is all facts. So it trumps all else.
    1
  137. Because they know Islam is firm whereas Christianity is not.
    1
  138. If people really felt like they could not speak out about Islam, there would not be so much propaganda against Islam and so many people who in fact due speak out about it. The problem with many people speaking though is that they don't speak the truth or they misunderstand which naturally, will bother some people when someone else decides to talk about them or what they believe. People literally give death threats to people of all faits, on the news, in schools, in government office, etc who say things they don't agree with. This is a feature of humans and not from Islam or unique to Muslims. There will always be people who are fanatical, who act outside their religious teachings, who go off the deep end, who make mistakes, etc. They do not represent their faith if they are doing something not from their faith.
    1
  139. You can't? Why? Plenty of people do.
    1
  140. Muslims are already with Christ. They follow Jesus the way he worshipped God and the way the people who followed him during his time worshipped God.
    1
  141. It's the only religion accepted by God. It's all we have left.
    1
  142.  @zeromiedo1218  Sure, it is how the world will cope. It saved Western civilization before, it will again. Look it up and learn the history and you'll see. No other religion has the solutions for today's problems. No other religion has an authentic book. All the rest have been proven false. Nothing in Islam has been proven false. People are waking up and learning!
    1
  143. Islam is balanced and logical.
    1
  144. Many Christians enjoy living in Muslim countries as their morals align. Where is this persecution of Jews and Christians happening exactly?
    1
  145. That is not true. You should look up Christian terrorism.
    1
  146.  @amaira8812  May God continue to guide is Amaira and the haters. So many people hated Islam, learned about it and then came to love it. This has been something that has happened throughout history. I am happy to see many Muslims being strong in their belief and speaking up against falsehood and to see so many people coming to Islam more and more everyday. The truth is clear; People are waking up and seeing Islam is the only way. I hope I can help. ​ May they all be guided to Islam!
    1
  147. No one worships Muhammad ﷺ and he did not have sex with a child. Why would God get married or have sex? That is as illogical as Jesus being God or God being any man.
    1
  148.  @miloddvoranak8900  No, 'cause was a not a pedophile and did not sexually molest anyone. Most people, seems the majority being Christian, seem okay with protecting pedophiles sadly though. They haven't collectively taken a stand as the majority in the world against that.
    1
  149. Anyone who massacred innocent people does so outside of the legislation of Islam and that would apply to all religions (and more aptly Christianity). Think colonization, the trans Atlantic slave trade, KKK, etc. Liking and haing respect for other religions is not the same as treating other people well and respecting them as people. You do not have to like what someone beliees to treat them well and Islam has a superior justice system that calls for the good and fair treatment of all people. The same religion that forces people to follow their rules like all countries do? Which countries allow you to break their rules? Muslims might insist on their own rules which would be good rules for all countries but they certainly cannot break the rules or do they have the power to force their rules on the government. If they did, they would just like any group of people would! lol Muslims being easily triggered to violence is false and would apply across the board to all people, being humans and not be special or unique to Muslims. In fact, it would be lower. People would have us think otherwise, and some push that narrative but it isn't backed up by any real data. The percentage of even terrorists incidents, which are not from Islam, are low. History definitely does NOT show us Islam has the tendency for violence and theocracy more than any other religion! lol Please review history again. Start with the Crusades and compare what the Muslims did to what others did. No one who knows history would say Muslims were the most violent religion. Not even people who read the Bible and Quran would say that.
    1
  150. Yes, the lack of free speech can be good. All speech should not be said and isn't productive for societies. Respect for religion already exists in Islam. Poverty is not unique to Muslim majority societies in fact, many of them are not poor at all. They're quite rich. "Injustice" is relative or subjective and depends on what you mean.
    1
  151. That depends on what the sin is but as far as what Jesus believed in, he followed Judaic Law which has capital punishment. Islam is more like Judaism and Islamic Law like Judaic Law, the law Jesus believed in.
    1
  152. No, it is nearly impossible for Muslims to convert to Christianity. Missionaries have found this out over many years which is why they focus their efforts on creating doubt in them over Islam than trying to convince them to be Christian. It is very difficult to convince anyone to be Christian who has not been raised and indoctrinated in it, unless for some emotional or worldly reasons. This is why Christians often coerced and compelled people into Christianity. There's really no way anyone can believe in the Bible after the Quran. It's too many mistakes and problems in it.
    1
  153. People who know what men like and what motivates them.
    1
  154. No socity is perfect but Muslims socities are fare more peaceful, safe and secure than Western ones and non-Muslims are tolerated plenty. Perhaps their immoral behaviors are not but that's a good thing and everyone has free will and can make choices wherever they are in the world. That's why their are rules and laws. You can CHOOSE to do what you like; you also might have to face consequences for doing so.
    1
  155. That would be because those are perverted men like some men all around the world of every faith. It is not okay in Islam, obviously. Just like it is not okay for Christian clergy to abuse young girls and boys.
    1