Youtube comments of G L (@gelinrefira).
-
I'm an application scientist for a German instrument company. We sell high end analytical instruments, each piece can sell upward to over a million. Just trying to sell one machine in SE Asia and India is like pulling teeth. Research institutes, agencies, even Government ones often do not have enough budget to buy even one and sometimes entire institute have to pool money to get one. But you need these instruments to do bleeding edge research especially in life sciences.
In China, if they want it, they will get the budget to buy it. They buy not one, not two, they buy a dozens. A fricking dozens and they have these machines working and churning out data all the time. And they do it for multiple national labs, universities and even smaller institutes can still get the budget for one or two. The daring to innovate, and to requisite the resources to achieve those goals in China is astounding, it is simply on another level. Only America and Europe can come close to the level of budget that China can summon to get things they need to push to the bleeding edge.
In research, having the money to do things is as important as having the people to do it. China has both and will not give up getting both to get things done. And they are focused, and relentless, optimistic and boundless in energy. Only those who visited China, talked to the people there, eat with them, drink with them and see them work understand this.
China will get the chips they need. It is without any doubt that it will happen.
1000
-
647
-
466
-
396
-
384
-
Kevin brings up an important point. If your country relies on an American company for your crucial communication infrastructure, you do not have digital and data sovereignty. This is why China's Great Firewall exist, why they build alternative digital outlets and to prevent US big tech from taking over their digital space because once you allow that to happen, the US government can do whatever it wants to your government, your people, your society, your politics, and your culture.
Remember snow dan, remember what the nsa did, remember prism, remember that American companies like cisco are constantly found to have backdoors in their products. Now even intel chips are found to have backdoors. Everything that comes out of American companies are basically spyware. The moment the US accused China of installing backdoors and spyware is the moment it confirmed that the US have done that to all American tech companies.
378
-
353
-
331
-
I don't think de-dollarization is only about not using the dollars, although that is a large part of it. If China is indeed taking those USD they got back from selling those bonds and setting up THEIR own financial system to deal with the USD they own, they are still de-dollarizing. The USD system hinges primarily on the dollar recycling BACK into US in the form of bonds so the demand of the USD can be maintained and they don't get hyperinflation with the way the fed print money. If China, and Russia can create an independent financial system that can deal USD and Euros without ever touching US financial system, loans, bonds or whatever, then that is effectively de-dollarization. It is de-imperializing the USD, it is de-empire the financial empire of the US. And it will be fatal to the US.
Unless you are telling me that the Feds can sanction any country by having records of all the legal tender they hold by each greenback's serial number and then literally voiding the legal tender of those serial numbers, then well, China and the world will have no choice but to de-dollarize in the most literal sense.
But honestly, seeing China selling off the bonds at a loss just to get the physical dollars back is quite shocking, consider that the losses must be huge. They probably know that the US is mulling the ultimate sanction on China and they can no longer wait. After this election, if biden wins, he might go all-in trying to block China. And if he really even considering provoking a proxy conflict in East Asia the way the US did with Ukraine, then it will have to be in his second term because he has no more election to worry about and the US is out of time.
That is unacceptable to China, so you are right that they will never want to be in the same position as Russia and the fact that they are doing this means they have very reliable intel that the US is going to try to do something extremely foolish.
That is also unacceptable to us living in SE Asia too.
331
-
329
-
317
-
240
-
219
-
Don't forget one very very important point. China is not just about supply chain dominance, it is also about CAPITAL CONTROL. All the largest banks in China (and the world) are state owned, and many of their best companies are also state owned. The Chinese government can direct immense amount of capital, not from borrowing, to any areas they deem are of national strategic importance. This is not possible for the US and the west where most of the capital not borrowed by the governments are in the hands of private banks and companies. It is that capital control that allow China to centrally plan their industrial polices, and their economy - a Lenin innovation, and a crucial part of Marxist-Leninism. The SOEs and banks work for the people, they work for the government, they don't work for private, rent seeking parasites.
If we are going to talk about the success of the Chinese model, Socialism with Chinese characterizatics, it is time we actually give credit where credit is due and stop this western propaganda BS against socialist ideologies and concepts. It is doing a disservice to deny the most powerful philosophical tradition of criticism of capitalism. It is also irrational and foolish to keep denying the power of the socialist models which has succeeded despite western aggression and slander and misrepresentations.
218
-
211
-
210
-
206
-
202
-
200
-
198
-
186
-
182
-
180
-
176
-
176
-
167
-
167
-
166
-
147
-
143
-
I kind of glad that the Chinese market is not spending like drunk sailors, the way American/western capitalists think they would. Something has to change, and we can't keep driving this reckless, irresponsible, unsustainable economic model of consumption and growth. The Chinese people are more cautious about their finances and they are more responsible about governing their economy. The Chinese culture is not based on materialistic consumerism that rot the western culture and gave their oligarchs immense power.
Yes, it is going to be tough but I think in the long run, changing the way we look at the economy, especially about how to shepherd it is vital for our future, especially when dealing with climate change and growing wealth inequality. There is no such thing as infinite growth, and we cannot keep going through this destructive boom and bust cycle. We must abandon the western capitalist model of economic thinking and switch to a more human centric, focus on public interests, sustainable way of governing the economy. Yes, you won't have these glitzy growth rate, and crazy profits per quarter but this form of economic thinking is ultimately self destructive and it will kill us all in the long run. I will even argue western capitalist model is one of the Great Filters that kills intelligent civilizations.
China is willing to take on pain in the short and mid term in order to create a more equitable and sustainable economic model in the long run. I welcome China's new approach to governing the economy and the Chinese culture towards more cautious consumption. China is still on the path towards socialism and they are not going to be reckless with their economy. They will not tolerate cowboy financial shenanigans like Evergrande and Wall St. They won't bail these economic terrorists out, and I applaud them for it. Everyone should adjust accordingly.
I have to correct you Sean. Wall St. do not believe in a rising tide lifts all boats. They want China to save them and when they are saved, they will revert to "F*ck you, I got mine."
A n*ke on Wall St will literally make the world a better place instantly.
142
-
139
-
137
-
135
-
132
-
131
-
126
-
123
-
122
-
120
-
118
-
116
-
116
-
112
-
112
-
104
-
104
-
103
-
99
-
96
-
92
-
90
-
90
-
90
-
90
-
89
-
87
-
85
-
81
-
81
-
80
-
80
-
80
-
77
-
75
-
74
-
69
-
69
-
68
-
68
-
67
-
67
-
67
-
65
-
62
-
61
-
61
-
61
-
60
-
58
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
Their government style and philosophy and priorities are also completely completely. The CPC is driven primarily by development of the country and delivering promises made to the Chinese people. Their legitimacy, as Xi himself emphasize in their recent party general meeting comes from keeping the people happy with China's development, and if they fail, the Chinese will give them the boot very easily. Their system generally work around consultation, consensus building, and feedback from the people, choosing capable low ranking officials by locals and then moving up the ranks through meritocratic contributions. This creates a cadre of politicians that are highly motivated, civic-minded, very disciplined, strategic, smart and technocratic. It's not perfect because there is still a lot of corruption and the quality of bureaucrats and administrators can vary with top notch officials tend to gravitate towards large cities and centers of power, and lower quality officials stay at poorer, less developed provinces. But central planners know this and they have a strong oversight system.
India OTOH is styled like western liberal democracy, in a culture that is far less developed politically and economically. The liberal western democratic doesn't even work very well in the west as nearly all western countries are completely hijacked by neoliberal capitalists and their democratic processes are often complicated, arcane, with lots of undemocratic elements built into it designed to nerf actual people power, and based mostly around theatrics, public and media manipulation, popularity contest, and big money support, not around merit or strength of character. This is exacerbated in India where corruption is even worse than China and billionaires and big businesses used even more underhanded methods to keep the people down, the economy suited to their interests and the politics controlled for their own power.
Cheap labor can only get you so far, and China has proven yet again (last time by the Soviets) that some form of centrally planned economy is far more efficient than laissez-faire neoliberal capitalism or even classical liberalism at industrializing a country. China went further and developed their own socialistic model modified from Marxist-Leninist model, combining some elements of free market economy, with push for vital sectors for development and central long term, strategic planning while holding ultimate political power to prevent the billionaire class from taking over the country.
Mid and high tech industry cannot survive on cheap labor alone, it requires infrastructure (stable electrical grid, transport, residences, factories, offices), high skilled labor (emphasis on education), political support, stability and security, and synergistic combination of various supporting industries all preferably within the same area. That's why the Guangzhou-Shenzhen bay area is the tech hub of the world today, and it was created from combining central planning (Shenzhen Special Economic Zone) with capitalist investment and market economy, up to a certain point.
India's political situation cannot replicate these modes of governance. That's why India cannot copy China's model and it will not supersede China until they can resolve their fundamentals.
54
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
52
-
52
-
While Balakrishnan can say that Singapore must support international order, it must be pointed that the country that violates the most international laws is actually the US.
What we are witnessing is the breakdown of the American empire and the rise of multipolarity, where more nations are gaining stronger sovereignty over their own country and escaping the western dominance. It is a mistake to view this as a crisis, that the world is breaking down. No, it is just the western order of neocolonialism that is breaking down. Singapore must be nimble to navigate this as an independent nation free from being obligated to the western order. Yes, Singapore has benefited from throwing our eggs in the western order basket. But now it is time to move into this multipolar world where we cannot depend on the west dominating everyone and shutting down dissent.
If the FM is serious about protecting Singapore's sovereignty, then he must take Singapore's freedom to associate freely with any powers, any country seriously and to shed the western tinged goggles that the world is "breaking down". For 80% of the population in the world, their world is finally starting to be built up. That is the correct view the Singapore government should be taking because there are now many many opportunities for trade with new partners.
If we are really serious about the international order, then we should also acknowledge that the Ansar Allah is blockading the Red Sea because ALL NATIONS are obligated to stop any gen*cide as stipulated in the Geneva Convention. What the Ansar Allah has done is essentially an economic sanction on the west. If the US can violate international laws, and trade regulations and unilaterally sanction hundreds of countries, then Ansar Allah has the right to sanction the west to respond to an ongoing gen*cide.
I know the FM is a politcian and has to make sure Singapore does not offend the west, especially the US but here we can at least be able to call a spade a spade. Let us not delude ourselves into thinking that the Red Sea blockade is not directly tied to Israel's committing a gen*cide right in front of all of us brazenly, and the west remorseless and unconditional support for it. That is an actual breakdown of international order that the FM so valiantly is trying to defend.
52
-
52
-
The Chinese government will not likely allow the RMB to be freely floated and thus be speculated upon. There are Chinese Marxist economists like Hu Qiyuan even said monetary policy control shold be returned to the National People's Congress, not remain in the hands of central government bureaucracy, though he does advocate at the same time for more liberalization of the RMB to be utilized at higher rate in international trade. Controlling monetary supply and national capital is the key to socialist control over capitalists. It is what allows China to control their bourgeois class while reaping real economic growth in real assets like factories, technologies, agriculture, minerals, real estate, and of course the consumption of it.
They are not interested in financializing their economy like what the neoliberals did to the US from the 80s onward. They are building their own financial system to secure their own capital and to lubricate economic development and international trade in real stuff, not to engage in fake stuff like financial speculation and wall street casino practices. They don't actually want RMB to become the next reserve currency like the way the USD is. They are not interested in that because the reserve currency status require complete liberalization of your currency and allowing it to float freely while you have to print enough money to support the financial market. In the end, you will turn your economy from making real things into gambling other people's money in fake, virtual stuff. That is antithetical to socialism. This is moreso shown in that they are developing cutting edge fintech that lubricate economic activities, not developing new derivatives and other speculative financial instruments.
Their goals, philosophy and practice are fundamentally different from the neoliberal capitalist system in the US. It is something that western economists and financiers are supposedly scratching their heads over every time they "analyze" what China is doing. So either that they are truly are incapable of understanding it, or they are refusing to even acknowledge it by pretending to be confused over China's actions, and I'm inclined to believe the latter.
52
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
49
-
47
-
47
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
Yup. The crucial ingredients that all these videos refuse to admit is that Singapore government works, and they work for the people. Westerners cannot fathom, even want to admit that a government may not be an adversary to the people or the individual. They will not admit that the government is part of the country and the people can love their government and be part of the community. This is especially true to Americans who are brainwashed since young to treat the government as a necessary evil and is only there to screw things up. Only private companies are the best, and billionaires and other rich people are messiahs, they are the only ones who create jobs, create the economy, the titans of industries. Government people are evil and are not part of the community and they only seek to corrupt everything. Never mind that the government in these countries are controlled and corrupt by the private sector.
This distorted view about government, the state, the people and private corporations is why they cannot understand how countries like Singapore, and dare I say to a large extent China can be so immensely successful. It must be cheating, some sort of repression, oppression by the government, stealing or whatever excuses they can come up with to explain anything, except the most obvious explanation: governments headed by PAP in Singapore or the CPC in China really do care about their people and country, and they do pursue policies that are crafted to benefit as many people as possible, and to maintain the health of the economy, and strive for common prosperity.
The other thing they refuse to admit is that central planning works. Singapore is actually a hybrid system that combines using socialism and capitalism, with a very strong central planning ideology and pragmatism that is rooted in material reality and that the economy must be bend to serve the people. It is highly Hegelian and Marxist. It is in many ways, also Leninism that emphasize a strong central government control occupied by a cadre of politicians that has strong theoretical education and will to serve, to ensure the excesses of capitalism, and the vagaries of the market kept tightly under control and limited. They make capitalism work for them, not the other way around.
To the westerner drunk on the capitalist cultural hegemony, this is not only unfathomable, it is literally evil incarnate. They cannot accept such a paradigm.
What Singapore did is not replicatable in the west because their capitalist class, their oligarchs will not allow their government to exert such control over them. A lot of the principles pioneered by Singapore, especially by the PAP are actually being practiced in China, albeit with significant modifications, to a stunning success. But a westerner will rather put a gun into his mouth and blow his brains out than to admit that.
45
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
Singapore is a small country that has to be very careful in how it maneuvers in the international arena. Singapore must be neutral and principled and predictable in the way it deals with other nations. So it is understandable why Singapore does not want to get involve directly with the politics surrounding the gen*cide going on in Gaza committed by Israel. Yes, it is a gen*cide and yes it is absurd that YT will likely censor this comment if I don't type the word to bypass it.
But Singapore's position cannot be tied to any one country, especially one that is becoming the pariah of the world even as the west tries to cover for Israel. We know the western media is lying, we know they are trying to do damage control and we know that no one outside the western media bubble is falling for it.
If we want to be realpolitik, the west is only 17% of the world population, even including Australia, Japan and South Korea. The rest of the 83% of the world mostly have disagreed with the west on Ukraine and find the Gaza situation absolutely intolerable. Singapore should do well to understand that even if we are closely tied to the western regimes, we have to plan to exit the western world if things get worse. We need to keep all options open and we can never, ever be locked into supporting one side or another.
On a more moral ground, the situation in Gaza is absolutely horrible, and if the Singapore government is still blindly supporting the west and Israel on this, it will inevitably earn the ire of the Singapore populations, especially our Muslim brothers and sisters. I know of more westernized angmohphile Singaporeans are very much brought into western propaganda and believe somehow this is a "complicated" situation but I don't think most other Singaporeans will see it that way, Chinese, Malays, Indians and all other peoples living here. It will be a mistake to underestimate how dissatisfied many Singaporeans are with the government's position with regards to Israel and Gaza.
Tread carefully.
43
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
You just need 1 such missile to get through the defenses to give the carrier a very bad day. And countries like Russia and China has hundreds of them. China in particular, has anti-ship weapons in every form - ballistic from space, hypersonic from upper and lower atmosphere, supersonic, subsonic sea skimmers, they can be long range land based rocketry, or launched from jets (land based and carriers) and bombers, from subs (and also torpedoes), and surface ships. They have hundreds of each type in their inventory and even more for the cheaper, less capable ones and if sh*t really hits the fan, they have a complete manufacturing chain within their own country and suppliers from all over the world that will be nigh impossible to blockade and can churn these missiles out by the dozens, hundreds even every month. China now has 30% of the entire world's manufacturing capacity and probably even more if we care counting high tech manufacturing. Such an economy if switched to total war economy will be unstoppable.
We are not talking about the launch of a dozen missiles at a carrier group. If the US really provoke a hot war with China, their carrier groups will be facing hundreds, if not thousands of missiles in multiple salvos coming from space, air and underwater in West Pacific. If US vassals dare to join up, they are looking at their entire navy wiped out within hours. This is just what they can do today. In 5, 10 years time, we will be seeing even more crazy stuff coming online that China is developing right now.
Oh they can mine the entire first island chain if they really want to and ground shipping to Taiwan, Japan and South Korea into a halt and collapse their economy within weeks. Just look at what the Houthis have done to Israel shipping. China can do a 1000x more.
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
@harrybrooks8514 I'm just getting tired of people sounding like education can be all transposed onto YT videos and they can all be entertaining so no one has to sit down and actually do the work to learn and apply the concepts, the equations, the theories, do the reading and write their papers in a coherent, logical, well-sourced manner.
I taught at college level before, and sure I can explain the concept of reaction equilibrium and rate of reaction in an entertaining, low impact way but that video is not going to help you calculate the final concentration of reactants vs products, or how fast it will go. I can make mass spect entertaining but you are not going to learn how to calculate the time it take to fly through the tube for a particular ion at a m/z, and if you want a job in this field, you gonna have to make those calculations or at least understand WTF the equations even mean. Similarly, you are not going to pass the bar by watching Law and Order, or become an MD by watching doctors describe stuff in entertaining fashion on YT.
None of that are in these entertaining videos that are just survey level of interesting topics for laypeople, and it does not replace going to school or college. Education is hard, it requires work, and it requires discipline, and teachers are not there to be your jesters.
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
China's priority is long term, sustainable growth, poverty alleviation and common prosperity. That means they are not interested in superficial numbers, they are interested in numbers that indicate people are doing well. That means affordability of necessities, high savings and investments from the common people, good paying jobs that have wages that can raise with inflation, education level, economic stability, industrial, agriculture output, cost efficient and effective, useful services and most importantly, the approval of the people. They don't care about the bottom line of bourgeois companies, especially when they have created a situation that have harm the country. There is no way they will accept this "get loan from peter to pay paul" bullsh*t. It is anathema to their political ideology and if they don't want angry Chinese rioting, that's the last thing they want to do.
What China is doing is giving the world a blueprint on how to govern responsibly, for the people, and the west HATE the CPC for that.
This is the right way when thinking on how to govern the economy.
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
Think about it. blinken is saying that because most of the money is kept in the MIC and thus in America, supplying weapons to Ukraine is helping to boost the American economy.
There are at least X problems with this statement. First, it assume that making weapons is good just because it provides jobs. That is vile, and weapons are not produce for consumption for the ordinary people, it is wasted resources that can otherwise be channel to more productive and better things.
Second, it is saying that in a roundabout way, the war in Ukraine is basically exchanging Ukrainians lives for money to be generated and spent in America making weapons to be send to Ukraine. As long as the war continues, there is more excuse to create money out of thin air to feed the American MIC. This is beyond vile. This is just evil. And before anyone say Russia invaded Ukraine, it was the US that created the situation in the first place by crossing Russia's red lines and in bad faith not honoring any agreements made with Russia previously. Will you sit idly by when the bully is coming and telling you he is going to beat you up, and he is just flexing his muscle on you?
I know this is an economic channel and Sean is just telling things the way it is, but you cannot look at these events, and the arguments put forth by American leadership and how they twist something so bizarrely evil into something the west and the rest of the world is supposed to stand behind, is just vomit-inducing.
This is why I cannot wait to see the western imperialism collapse. Is it going to hurt us? Yes. But in the long run, it will be better for the rest of us not to have for people so vile, so evil controlling us.
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
De-risking, de-coupling is not weird, it's ideological. It's always ideological. America still wants to dominate but it has been dealt a fatal blow from China's rise so they are having an ideological crisis of faith where on one hand they want to think of themselves as above China and can control and dominate China for "freedom" and "democracy" (hahahahahahaha) but on the other hand, the material reality is their economy will collapse utterly if they force a decoupling from China and try to force their vassals to do the same.
It was easy to decouple from the USSR because the Soviets never truly integrated their economy with the rest of the world. China is completely different. Nearly 200 countries in the world and over 120 of them boast China as their number one trading partner. Most of the rest have China as their number two or three trading partner. US cannot de-couple from China because that will mean decoupling from the world as no country will follow the US off that cliff. De-risking, friend-shoring is just desperation as it is a half baked measure it cannot fully remove the core industrial capabilities and technologies from China since China can either buy them from others or develop by themselves. The US is in the same position as the USSR during the Cold War but unlike the USSR, the US is not self-sufficient.
We have come to a simple situation:
Everything the collective west has or can do, China has and can do.
Everything the west still has and China doesn't have, China can develop or buy from others.
But what China has and can do, the west might not be able to have or can do.
China cannot be stopped, contained or controlled by the west anymore, and it is driving the westoid neoliberals, nationalists and racists absolutely insane. All China needs to do is bide its time to wait for the critical inflection of the US economy and destroy them.
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
It should be noted that your comment about the younger generation, the millennials and Gen Z of China not knowing what China was like back in the 80s and 90s works not just in how the transition of China shaped them, but also how they are less bounded by the traditions and rules laid down by the older generation especially in foreign policies.
In the past, Deng Xiaoping said China needs to lie low, bide their time to become strong so they can achieve industrialization in relative peace. This is indisputably accomplished with magnificent results from the central planning of the CPC, the Marxist Leninist socialism with Chinese Characteristics. The younger generation has grown up in this hyper paced transformation, this is a generation that is not only hopeful, innovative, highly educated, they are also proud of their country's achievements and its growing power. They will demand respect and the appropriate attitude confers to a superpower.
The US provoking China and that China has not responded decisively in something big to knock the US out is still because of Deng's era of restrain. I think this culture of restrain is slowly going away and why shouldn't it go away. But the political environment in China is very vibrant and the people are smart enough to understand Deng's restrain. But I can tell everyone one thing, if China is going to take a shot at the king, they won't miss and the US will reap what it sowed.
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
A Chinese historian pointed out that China did expand in the past but it often took a very long view for its conquest and tributaries. It can take decades if not centuries to assimilate, sinicized other peoples which is how places like Xizhang (Tibet) and Xinjiang became part of Greater China. Xizhang was conquered by the Mongols and incorporated into the Yuan Dynasty but it took most of the entire Ming Dynasty to assimilate the region as part of China proper. China did not really used western colonial style to expand their territory, which is to go into another people's land, plant a flag and start taking the lands and enslaving or destroying the locals.
Western colonialism is brutal and often does not seek to assimilate the locals but to displace, replace or enslave them and it create an entire concept of virulent racism to justify that brutality. Such a concept is alien to the Chinese, which emphasize on tributaries, sinicization and slow incorporation. Which is why these places eventually did become part of China because at the end of it, they became Chinese. Even outside invaders like the Mongols (Yuan dynasty) and the Manchus (Qing dynasty) are themselves sinicized heavily . They became part of the conquered.
That's why it is intellectually dishonest to equate the history of places like Xizhang and Xinjiang in the same vein as western colonialism, as though China acquired these lands through western style brutality, racism, hypocritical double standards, and oppression.
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
@MikeyJJJ So was Singapore after decolonization. We didn't have a revolution but we also were oppressed by the British, and during WWII, by the Japanese.
It might be the characteristics of American culture to be highly resistant to authority, but taken to the extreme like how they do, is just childishness. At this point, the way Americans are anti-authoritarian is just like a child sitting at the dinner table refusing to eat his broccoli and keep saying "I don't wanna!"
Also, the Chinese and Singaporeans are not "pro-authoritarian". Everyone is anti-authoritarian to some degree, but it is not just the degree that counts, it is also the kind of reasons why you are anti-authoritarian. There is no point in being anti-authoritarian against rules that make the society safer, more prosperous and more unified. OTOH, it is wise to be anti-authoritarian against measures that are oppressive. The wisdom of a person and the society is to recognized the difference.
Eat your broccoli even if you don't like it because it is good for you. But it's okay to refuse junk food, because it's bad for you. The problem is that Americans think not eating the broccoli after being told to do so, is freedom and individualism. And then they are tricked into eating junk food by corporations because it is so tasty they can't resist eating it, even though they were manipulated into thinking they chose it. They also thought that is freedom and individualism. That is peak stupidity.
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
Yea, Patrick is good at analyzing what rich people will do. Not so good at analyzing what other countries and working class will, as they have a completely different economic, financial out look and social mores, and priorities. For example, China deliberately pop their real estate bubble and refuse to bail out the overleveraged developers, making sure the home buyers and suppliers get their stuff first and let the vulture investors have the scraps. Then they used this opportunity to diversify the entire country's economy away from real estate, and impose strict limits on developers. This is unheard of in the west, it broke every rule in their book and it boggles their minds and all they can do is keep saying it won't work, it won't work, it won't work.
Well, what do you know, taking care of your people first result in even higher approval ratings and the economy will eventually recover from the pivot and put energy in other useful sectors instead of useless and endless financial speculations. China is doing just fine because it does not work the same way as the western economies. Their policies and the actions will never be taken by western neoliberal capitalist governments and it is blowing the minds of western economists who have drank their own kool-aid on neoliberal economic dogmas.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
The problem with Americans is that a lot of them truly believe they are the good guys all the time. That no matter how bad they screwed up, or how nefarious their intentions are, they are still the good guys because the ASSUMED everyone opposing them is worse than them.
It means that they believe in a very black and white worldview and dissenting narratives are not tolerated despite them saying they have freedom of speech. You get canceled if you say the wrong things, either through public opinion or through official channels. Dissenters are seldom explicitly censored so they can maintain an air of plausible deniability that they are practicing censorship. Like that article Brian showed naming him and his peers as Pro-China shills, they manipulate public opinion against dissenters in order to silent them. This is their MO for practicing information control and censorship.
This also means that it frees them from any moral and ethical obligations when fighting themselves "evil" enemies. Which is why they can exercise double standards, being hypocritical and conveniently ignore facts against them, without any qualms. If you are fighting the devil, you use every trick in the book. No action is underhanded, unscrupulous, dishonourable when fighting the devil, right?
It has gotten to such an absurd degree that they have been able to convince a disturbingly large segment of their population that Russia is bad for invading Ukraine. But Israel is the "most moral" army in the world, and there is totally no gen*cide in Gaza and Hamas is the evil one and the war begins at Oct 7.
However, it is also clear that these public opinion manipulation is losing its power as non western countries don't buy it anymore, and westerners are growing tired and cynical towards their own media. The lack of support against Russian sanctions by non western nations, the huge number of protests around the world including in the west against Israel, and people simply not that interested in Xinjiang lies anymore is testaments to that.
When the world is finally rid of American Imperialism and western domination, we need to have an international legal system to keep in check these propaganda and public opinion manipulation.
China's leadership as usual, is prescient towards this and enacted control over their information sphere with the great firewall. This protected Chinese citizens from western social media invasion and manipulation and protected their citizens' data, achieving true data sovereignty. While the rest of the world gets attack with psyops and color revolutions.
Western media needs to be collared and controlled after this is all over because they have proven to be nefarious and another tool by their empire's imperialists to attack other countries.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
Arsenal of democracy is overblown. Like nearly everything written in the west, it is either exaggerated, misrepresented, or outright lies. By the time the Lend Lease happened, the Soviets were already producing huge amount of war material from artillery, to planes to tanks. The Lend Lease contributed probably around 10% of Soviet war material, and it happened AFTER Stalingrad, which is where the tide of the war truly turned. What Stalin needed from the west was to open the western front sooner than later so he could save as many Soviet citizens' lives but the west took their own sweet time to do so. By the time D-Day happened, Germany has already inevitably lost the war. The Soviets won the war through their ingenuity, perseverance, immense efforts and shoulder the bulk of the suffering and sacrfices while the west whimpered behind the English channel and the Atlantic Ocean.
It is time we correct history.
9
-
9
-
The way I see it, is that this is one of the seminal events that trigger a reordering of the world.
Many times in history, you see this kind of triggering events that spark a whole chain of events with people, countries reacting and acting to these chains of events. The result will settle the world order for decades, even centuries to come.
These triggers that will cause the subsequent chains, are always backed by development months and years prior. WWI was sparked by the assassination of the Archduke but it wouldn't become WWI of it was not for all the great powers doing their thing and forming blocs, and alliances that dragged everyone into the quagmire.
We have been seeing a monumental shift for years now, and there are many events like the China joining WTO, BRI, BRICS, 9/11, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the general decline of the west with the 2008 crash, along with them still not learning their lessons while the general rise of the China, Russia, central Asia and the Global South.
Now these developments will come to a head. We are seeing this with maidane coup in 2014 in Ukraine, that led to the war. Now we are seeing the culmination of Israel genocidal policies burst into flames from the attacks by Hamas.
We are witnessing history. At this point, keep your cash and gold and just hold on for the ride.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
It is not really jealousy. It's fear. US politics has always been based on neoliberal ideologies, that the US government must have hegemony over the world and the corporate institutions form the backbone of US economy and power. That hegemony allows the US government, and by extension American corporations, to act with near impunity. They have done so since the end of WWII. You could say the Chinese government is doing the same thing but it is actually not that relevant. What is relevant is the thought process behind advancing and preserving American hegemony: they know if America loses that hegemony, American corporations will be relegated to second tier institutions. They will have to compete on equal grounds with the everyone else and they will not be able to enjoy the power, prestige and command over the world's economy and thus unable to exploit other countries and peoples with impunity.
Losing that power, even the possibility, is driving the corporate world of America and the US political establishment insane. That's why you see so much hostility from western media and the US government. They don't want to lose that power to exploit with impunity and they know that they themselves can be targeted for exploitation and RETALIATION from their victims if they cannot control everything.
I think most Americans can get used to a multipolar world where they are not automatically by default being catered to. But some Americans, especially conservatives and those with wealth and power, a multipolar world is nightmarish. Imagine an American billionaire arrested in Ghana for exploiting the country and subjected to Ghanaian laws, because Ghana has the economic strength to resist the US government. from China's backing. The victims of American exploitation and meddling will have the power to prosecute the Americans responsible for it, and there is nothing the US government or the west can do about it because if they tried to intervene like they did before, the collective economic and military might of the new bloc of nations lead by China will block them.
That is the core of their hatred. They know a strong and an increasing influential China will deny them that power.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
I find it really hilarious that the F-16 is still touted as a weapon that a modern integrated air defense capable country will be afraid of. If you are bombing people with no SAMs and fighters, then sure F-16 will be an excellent weapon. Against a country with long-range, over-the-horizon radar stations, early warning, S-400s and Su fighters with big radars and BVR missiles, it will take hundreds F-16s to even make a dent and expect to lose a lot of them and the pilots in the battles ahead. A couple dozens F-16s will not make any difference at all, even if they are used strictly for launching standoff weapons against ground targets, and then fly the hell out.
Heck, we are not even asking which version of F-16s are they sending them? The A/B are virtually useless now and I don't think there are many of those left. The C/D variants are the most numerous and they don't have the capability to use BVR missiles like AIM-120s without some sort early warning or target finding from other sources. No way they are getting the E/F variant with the AESA radars, much less the latest V version, which barely fulfill the 4.5 gen fighter criteria.
Haha NATO is not even thinking of giving them F-15s. Or F-18s. Well, the US stopped F-18 production, both the original and super version, so they don't have spares anyway.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
The only side that is trying to provoke a war over Taiwan is the US.
China already made it very clear where their red line is with the One China Policy, which even the US has agreed to respect on the surface. Yet the US is trying to disrupt the status quo by deliberately stepping on the red line trying to force a reaction out of China.
It will be like China putting nuclear missiles on Cuba like back during the missile crisis knowing full well that is the US red line. If you do not respect other countries' security concerns and sovereignty, no amount of talk about freedom or liberty will give you any moral high ground. No one in the west Pacific wants war and everyone can see it is the US provoking one.
Only westerners are arrogant and blind enough to believe that the US is trying to protect Taiwan. Yea, by deliberately forcing Taiwan into a dangerous situation knowing full well how China and the Chinese people feel about the island. It will be as though China goes to Hawaii and fund and provide weapons to separatist groups there, then claim that Hawaii is now a country and have the right to secede from the union. To the Chinese, and most of the world, that is exactly what the westerners are doing when they start to claim that Taiwan is a country.
If you think China is going to be a pushover, you are going to be in for a nasty surprise. Moreover, China is governed by a highly rational, highly intelligent and disciplined corp of technocrats. If they are really as incompetent as you westerners love to delude yourselves with, then why worry about China? Because deep down you know China cannot be beaten down anymore. The Chinese government is far less likely to be move into making geopolitical mistakes than the US and the west which are more into ideological dogma and purity tests than actually governing their countries. The restrain they have shown, and yes it is restraint over pelosi's dumbass visit to Taiwan showed that level of discipline. They didn't start a war even when their own country has been invaded. On that alone, China only have to bide its time and continue to grow stronger and build alliances with countries put down and brutalized by the west. Within 10, 20 years China will find a way to reunify Taiwan peacefully.
If war comes to the west Pacific, we will all know it will be caused by the US, and the whole of East Asia will turn against the US. Even Japan and South Korea will find itself in an extremely difficult position.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
@lydiawhitting5406 LOL that's what you have been hearing from western media. Nearly all the projects that China has done with the Belt and Road Initiatives have been tremendous help to the countries who participate. They get roads, ports, basic infrastructure, like electricity and hospitals that can uplift their people out of poverty.
These infrastructure are also built according to the country's needs, not the needs of the MNC to extract resources.
The fact is that what you described is exactly what the west has done to Africa but China is doing the opposite, so you are fed these lies by your own media. The debt trap diplomacy is made up and came out almost altogether at the same time, showing a coordinated information warfare against China by the west collectively.
China has not confiscated anything nor can they do that nor have the desire to, they have not pressured anyone to take the loans they don't want, they did not deliberately give out loans knowing they can't be paid off, and they have always refinanced the loans if the loaners ran into difficulties.
That's why the US government is panicking trying to rein in China's BRI by attempting to bring their own initiative online... and failing miserably because it was obvious to everyone it is just a counter to China and not serious project and the amount offer is often insultingly small, and all they talk about is China China China and nothing about the interests of the locals. It's insincere and patronizing and insulting. That's why the the Summit of the Americas failed miserably because the US treated all the American countries like they are under its boots, and you think people have no dignity and self-respect. For the US, there is only I dominate, and you submit.
Fact is China's cooperation is always based on a win-win mentality that benefits all sides. They get access to a new market, the countries get help they desperately need. Recent polls across the Global South have shown that people view China generally favorably despite western information warfare. You just don't like that China is actually helping, and winning the hearts and minds of the Global South.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
I really don't get why Iran will seal off the Strait of Hormuz because a lot of that oil moving through that part goes to China. They just inked a huge BRI deal with China to exchange oil for infrastructure and development. KSA and Iran just made peace under the auspices of China, and a lot of Saudi oil moves through the strait. It doesn't make sense to close the strait because it will only hurt China, Iran and other Arabian peninsular oil and gas exporters. For the first time, in a long time, the Sunni and Shite are on the same side and I don't think Iran wants to destroy that.
I don't think Iran will close the strait but the US can come in and do a lot of damage on the pretext of blocking Iranian merchant vessels shipping oil to China. If the US is really foolish enough to blockade the strait with the explicit intent to stop Iranian oil from coming out and deny China, we might be seeing the first time China will face down US in a military confrontation. There is no way China will or can back down an act of war like this, because if they do, that means every choke point around the world is free game for the US. Today it is the Strait of Hormuz, tomorrow it could be the Strait of Malacca, or the next one is the Suez Canal.
As much as I don't want to see WWIII happen, I'm kinda morbidly interested in seeing a Nimitz carrier sunk by a DF-21.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@625as-pj5mg yes the PBOC is the central bank, but the Bank of China, the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, etc. are some of the biggest banks in the world and they are still state owned, or at least the state has large control over them.
The PBOC does what central banks do, like controlling the monetary policies and money printing. The other commercial banks do what commercial banks do. The difference is that the Chinese government still has a lot of control over the commercial banks, and this control over the vast majority of the capital assets of China, allowing them to move immense amount of capital for national strategic objectives, and to protect the collective wealth of the people from speculation and extraction. That's one of the key point of Marxist-Leninism, and socialism with Chinese Characteristics. Private capital, while big in China is absolutely dwarfed by these state controlled commercial banks.
It is why Jack Ma was hammered into the ground (deservedly so) by Chinese authorities because he wanted to create a shadow bank by using Alipay to do commercial banking services while disguising it as an innocuous payment system to skirt regulations. It is also why Chinese government has the power to hammer jack ma in the first place. Essentially, jack ma wanted to coup the Chinese government control of capital.
It is the most important reason western capitalists absolutely hate, hate, hate China with a burning rage. This is what they want to destroy, to "liberate" China from.
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@K2teknik. Nah, it can be well-defined. It is just that the definition in the west is deliberately incomplete because it focused exclusively on only one exact type of procedure of democracy and the ideological purity of those procedures (ie, voting) and do not consider the results of those procedures.
It simply makes the self-serving assumption that the procedures when used will automatically produce democracy.
It merely considers the corruption, perversion of those procedures as minor annoyances and not as a proof that the ideology and practice don't work. It is all ideology and no real praxis, or at least the west pretends the praxis work.
The results from these procedures, when hijacked by corrupting capitalist forces ultimately show that the system it engendered is not democracy. It is actually deeply anti-democratic.
Of course, it also conveniently automatically dismisses every other form of democracy because as someone said the west is automatically assumed to always be ontologically right, and everyone else is ontologically wrong.
That's why the China's full process democracy is dismissed as not democracy when it literally produces results that the Chinese people want and that it allows the Chinese people to hold their government to the fire when they are unhappy.
Yet, the absolutely corrupted bourgeois democracy of the US, where money flows so freely and so legally that no one even bothers to be surprised at how corrupted the system is, consistently producing anti-democratic results, is somehow more democratic than China. Heck, everyone keeps saying that the democracy in the US is broken and lobbying is terrible, yet somehow it is still better than China.
The only thing the US has, is that they can keep pretending they have the procedure and that the procedure is simply better, without actually proving it is better. In fact, it has been proven to be one of the worse way to practice democracy.
Basically, the west is full of BS but it pretends that it is not and demands everyone to believe it.
6
-
6
-
I think the covid and the real estate problem should be put in proper context. China came out of covid later than the rest of the world but with a death toll per capita far far lower than most of the world for a gigantic country. Yes, covid measure did a number on China's economy but it save potentially millions, if not tens of millions of lives. Those lives if lost could have done far immeasurably damage to China. Can you imagine if Liang Wenfeng died in covid, then we will never have DeepSeek.
As for the housing market, it was a bubble built by an overheating market with developers making dangerous bets, and unsound financial decisions. The bubble had to be pop, and China did it on THEIR terms. It is because of what they did, that China avoid a 2008-like financial disaster. If the bubble burst later than sooner, the financial fallout from those bad loans, bad business practices would have been absolustely devastating. The Chinese government did the right and have accomplish what no one has done in history; successfully pop a bubble and managed its draw down and reduce its fallout to a minimum.
The objective assessment of situations and rational management of any crisis or preventing the crisis in the first place is the proof of the strategic brilliance and administrative acumen and erudite of Chinese leadership. It is why China has already won this century because no country, no society, no culture can consistently produce leaders of such high caliber and a system that can move with the leadership.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
These narratives have been going on for some time on the online communities like Reddit. The usual being talking points like China is the biggest carbon emitter, China is building coal plants, they even say the dams China built are destroying people lives because they have to be relocated and areas flooded, ignoring the fact that the US did this long ago too. Many times they remove Native Americans from their ancestral homelands for these projects. Often they remove them just to steal their lands but somehow China is the bad guy.
But I am also seeing that these rhetoric are beginning to crack as more and more people are countering with per capita emission, and even historical emission. As far as I know, I was one of the first few to post counter narratives to China carbon emission by pointing out the historical emission of the collective west. Ben used the analogy of an arsonist telling his neighbor not to burn down the house. I use the analogy that it is like you have older brothers who took all the inheritance from your dead father and left you with nothing, and then look down on you for working at McDonald's to survive.
There is only so much the planet can support, a carbon debt pool if you will, that if we used it up, there is not enough to go around. So the collective west used up all the carbon debt for their industrialization, achieved a high standard of living, continues to support their wasteful lifestyles (American lifestyle are especially, disgustingly wasteful) and then lecture everyone else for trying to pull their people out of poverty using the same accessible, cheap energy sources. Climate change lecturing by the west, and especially by the US is appallingly hypocritical and another insane injustice they have inflicted on the world.
Instead of allowing them to put up these theatrical charades, the west needs to be be forced, even at gun point, to pay climate reparations to everyone else.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@davidmoss2576 The irony is that you don't even have to go back that far to see how national hubris can cause the downfall of a country. China's Century of humiliation was basically the hubris of the Qing Dynasty and its inability to reform, improve, adapt and fundamentally changed for the better. Japan during the Meiji Restoration was the direct opposite, and they beat China at the time when they barely got out of a revolution and still struggling to even do basic things. The results spoke for itself.
Now it is the west repeating the same mistakes as the Qing Dynasty: too proud to admit that they are wrong and unable to humble themselves to learn from their own mistakes and from other people who have found success. It's not just the military, it's everything. China uplifted 700 over million people out of poverty and built the most vertically integrated, dynamic economy in the world right now and the CPC still enjoys a fairly high approval rating from its people. Obviously they are doing something right. While America and the west is facing a shrinking middle class, rising poverty and wealth inequality, social unrest, rise of right wing extremism and generally incompetence and inability of their political systems to resolve any fundamental issue. Obviously, something is deeply wrong. And yet we still have people here criticizing China unabashedly and refusing to even acknowledge that, yes they have done something right. Without even that level of self awareness and reflection, the west is basically behaving like the Qing Dynasty at its twilight.
History may not repeat itself, but it really does rhyme.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
Concentrating on GDP is a mistake. China is planning for the long haul to reduce its reliance on fossil fuel and increase on renewable and nuclear because that offers far more energy security than fossil fuel since China can make its own solar panel, wind turbines and nuclear reactors while it can source all these raw materials from diverse sources and China itself is a huge rare Earth elements producer.
Second, pollution and environmental issues are real problems and China is not virtue signalling here. The reason why China's life expectancy has soared must have a lot to do with improving its urban air quality. Better health = less demand on healthcare = longer life expectancy = happier, more productive citizens. This is a no brainer.
Third, renewable and nuclear industries are the industries of the future, like semiconductors and EVs, has only room to grow and expand into. China need industries that are sustainable and can make money because it has to create jobs for hundreds of millions of working adults and only long term, high value, high tech, sustainable industries can provide that kind of jobs.
If China truly wants to play the number games like GDP, then all they have to do is attack the financial industries and release capital control and turn its state banks into Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase clones. But that is a short-sighted, ultimately futile and immoral industries that depends on absorbing other countries' surpluses to sustain, which means China will be force to go the imperialism route, just like the US today.
China chose not to go down this neoliberal evil path because they are socialists.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
It is true that the US does have a lot of mothballed shipyards. But bringing them up to modern standards and equipping them, hiring the people (if there are even enough qualified people) and create the entire supply chain to reactivate these shipyards is a pipe dream. If the US can't even muster the organization, resources, capital to even re-scale their semiconductor industry up to match even a fraction of that China has, then what credential do they have to say they can do the same for these shipyards to match the capacity of China? At a lower cost, since they want to copy China's model of dual use for civilian and military? Fat chance.
This is in the context that China is barely even using the capacity of their entire shipbuilding industry to build their warships. If China gets serious and they are willing to take an economic hit to convert their civilian ship orders to warship orders, they can churn out warships several times faster than what they are doing now. And what they are doing now is already outstripping US, Japan and South Korea warship building.
If China really get serious, for every ship US, South and Japan, even Europe can build, China can build a dozen. By the time the collective west can assemble an armada to invade China, assuming that if the collective west did not collapse from economic disaster of full decoupling from China and the world, China would have built 10 times that armada. For every anti-missile missile the west can load up in their VLS, China can build and launch 20 anti-ship missiles at them.
This is not even a contest.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
Indeed. In the past, when the F-22 first flown, the Chinese were truly in despair. They were even thinking that they are willing to throw their J-8 in a 8:1 exchange if it comes to defending their country. Their airmen were willing to sacrifice themselves. You cannot doubt their resolve and courage to think about going toe to toe with a F-22 in a J-8. Until they realized that even if they threw 50 J-8 at a F-22, it wouldn't even scratch the paint. They simply can't just throw lives and material away anymore. They need to tech up and create force multipliers. They have to bite the bullet and stay down, work frantically, work until they died on their research to make the breakthroughs their country need to defend themselves. They were willing to be humiliated constantly by the Americans just to keep their heads down, put their shoulder to the wheel and grind grind grind. The 6th gen fighters, the Type 055, the hypersonic MD-22, the Type 003, the DF-31AG are not accidents, or mere copies. They are supported by a nation who looked at their century of humiliation and said Never Again.
Americans do not understand a lick of what resolve of the Chinese, when they mean business. Like what Yang Jiechi said at Anchorage, the United States does not have the qualification to say that it wants to speak to China from a position of strength, and he mean it.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
They don't really need to. The Russians can build whatever they want, but that doesn't mean they want to just copy western weapons. They have their own doctrines and tactics, and that means they build different weapons.
What is more important is that they know how the missile work (guidance, propulsion, movement, warhead) and so they can decide counter measures. Like if you know what kind of chips, antenna, power supply etc. in the guidance system computer, you will know what kind of communication protocols, the radio power output/input, then you can create a way to jam it more efficiently. That will render the storm shadow pretty much useless.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
It not just about the systemic problems that makes hyper-individualism a ridiculous and harmful ideology, it is that hyper-individualism also fragment people apart to the point that the idea of communal living, true community (not just ideological affiliation and nationalism), and the ability to see structures that grow out of societies, are completely blind to that individual. It might sound cheesy but hearing how hyper-individualism is broken down on this video really reminds me of the ideas developed within Buddhism.
In Buddhism, there are usually two kinds of loves, self-love and great love. Self love is fairly self-explanatory, it's about taking care of oneself, your own enlightenment, your own self-esteem etc. Great love, is the kind of selfless love one is able to feel for other people, other creatures, and the community and society as a while and guides one's own actions and thoughts.
Capitalism with its hyper-individualism is absolutely antithetical to the concept and practice of Great Love, and I feel is at least a large part of why America is so screwed up at every level of its society, culture and economy. Americans are literally taught to be selfish, self-centered. I call this the Psychopathification of America and contributed to a lot of the systemic problems mentioned here. Capitalism basically turned normal Americans psychopathic. To a Buddhist, this is an evil ideology, it literally makes people commit more heinous deeds that increase their karma.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
The way I see it is that the US is the most carbon emitting country in history with the Europeans a close 2nd. That historical carbon emission is why we are having climate change, not just the current emission. Climate change has been making these wild fires in recent years more and more insane. This is well known by now. Yet, the US are woefully under prepared for such a disaster and in fact has been cutting corners on their firefighting capability.
So when the perfect wild fire strike, fueled by climate change of America's doing, coupled with inadequate firefighting capabilities and short-sighted policies and the cultural and economical cheapness of using wood as building materials, all come together to give the US the karma slap of the decade.
This is in stark contrast to the Chongqing fire just 2 years ago where China mobilized huge amount of resources and the people coming together to literally, physically made firebreaks that stopped the fires from reaching the city. Even more relevant is the earthquake in Xizhang that happened almost the same time as the LA fire, and we saw Chinese mobilize their disaster management immediately, reaching the disaster area within hours, and supplies poured in within 24 hours. Tents, firefighting, doctors, medical supplies, heating, all poured into a region thousands of feet above sea level.
It's hilarious too in the background of tiktok getting banned and Americans migrating to Rednote, an even more Chinese social media app and finding out that the Chinese people are nice, welcoming and funny. Even worse, they are finding out that the Chinese don't live in an authoritarian hellscape but instead enjoy affordable healthcare, groceries, world class transportation and safety unheard of in the US. People are posting angry and sad videos on the soon to be banned tiktok and on Rednote, saying how they have been lied to all their lives. That the only result the American system has produce is astronomical profits on the backs of ordinary Americans.
I find it amusing why Americans still act outraged by how under prepared they are for disasters at nice Katrina, and how their system does not incentivize spending money on things that don't make profits. If people is lamenting now, what are they going to do when the inevitable California earthquake strikes?
Good luck America.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
The only people who keep saying China is going to invade Taiwan are the Americans. China does not want to invade Taiwan, so long Taiwan does not declare independence. That's the red line. Respect that, and respect the One China policy and nothing will happen and reunification will be done peacefully. It will be like China going to Texas and supporting Texan separatists and encouraging Confederate ideologies for secession and then turn around and say "well Texas is a country now." Ohh, f** that.
Let me tell you, any side that forces SE Asian nations to choose a side, is gonna find them choosing the opposite side because if there is one thing SE Asian nations really hate is to be forced to choose sides in a conflict that is none of their business. The more the US government pushes SE Asia, the more it is going to alienate themselves. The more the US acts with arrogance and entitlement, the more it is going to turn off SE Asian nations and its people. One of which is the US keep misrepresenting that China is or want to invade Taiwan. We all know it is not true, we all know what the stakes are, and we are really really tired and pissed off at western disinformation. It doesn't work on us, so STFU and go home and fixed your own house first before coming to threaten Singapore that they "might need make some hard decisions."
I think the one who is going to make some hard decisions is America finally acknowledging that China's rise is inevitable and good, and prepare to engage with the world normally as a participant and not as a tyrant.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
China handed an olive brunch. China has consistently said it wants peace, it want development, it does not want hegemony and it does seek to supplant the US. China is not the threat, and they backed it up with actions.
They supported the US financial system. They bought US bonds heavily during 2008. They exported cheap goods and allow US companies to get filthy rich. They have never taken an aggressive, pre-emptive, unilateral military action against the US. All actions they did are in reaction to the US provocative actions, like literally doing electronic warfare on them using EW assets from their coastlines, sail warships up and down their front door, sanction them to stop them from growing and even explicitly said their president is a dictator, clearly indicating the US will love to see a regime change in China. Worst, the US keep saying one thing about Taiwan and One China Policy, then turn around and violate that principle brazenly.
China is not the threat here. The US is the the A grade, flaming as*ho*e here.
4
-
4
-
@jinheedong418 I lived in the US for over ten years, studied at its colleges, got my PhD and even have a minor in history. I even married an American. I say I am well qualified to talk about the US, and I say Free Guam (illegal seizure), Free Texas (stolen from Mexico), Free Hawai'i (stolen from native Hawai'ians), Free Puerto Rico (modern day colony), Free Native Americans and return their lands. The Sioux, the Lakotas, the Comanches, the Cherokees, the Shoshones, they all need to have their lands returned and become true independent countries of their own.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Forcing the US to pay more for their loans will be a good thing for world peace. The US military is supported by these loans. So if they have to pay more to finance their debts, they cannot use that money to put into their war budget. At some point, the interests on the debts will be too high to support such an exorbitant spending and they will have to cut back their military. Or they cut their welfare to such bare minimum their people will be at rock bottom. Either way, something gotta give and the faster their war budget collapse, the less they are going to be able to threaten other countries with violence and war.
The less threatening their military become, the less they are able to enforce their hegemony, less they are able to enforce the USD as the dominant reserve currency, and it will feedback loop into less influential the dollar has. The whole exercise is to force their military down by crashing their economy and the more the world get rid of US hegemony.
It will also ultimately benefit the American people because their country is basically hijacked by corporate interests, especially the MIC. They cannot break this stranglehold, which is why their quality of life is decreasing. By crashing their economy, the hope is that they themselves will be able to neuter the MIC and seize their country back. If the American people can actually be in charge, and not the neoliberal oligarchs, it might be possible to create a new world order when the new generation of American leaders can learn to live in a multipolar world. You cannot hope to create a multipolar world with the American oligarchs in power.
4
-
4
-
I wouldn't say it made the aircraft carrier obsolete but it made them more vulnerable and that's the point. It forces the USN out of China's immediate coastlines because the risks might be too high. That's the reason why the PLA put so much effort into their missile technology is to be able to threaten the USN and throw off their calculations. A carrier group might be able to intercept 4, 5 even 6 hypersonics, but 10? 20? And not to mention other kinds of missiles, subsonic, supersonic, ballistic coming from all altitudes, all angles, and all directions, and especially that now China has enough spy satellites, long range radars, long range drones to find these carrier groups, and send the intel back to HQ and connect with the PLA air force, rocket force and navy together. If the USN dares to even try something foolish within 1000 km of China's coastlines, the retaliation will be tremendous.
4
-
@Shenzhou. I do agree with your theme and think that the west has a deliberately narrow view of democracy. Democracy still means "rule by the people". We are just so used to democracy being always practiced with the western liberal democratic process that we forget ultimately, as long as the people can hold the government accountable, it is still democracy, a republic.
I think we should broaden our definition and measurement of democracy that include the RESULTS of policies and laws enacted by the ruling government, and the people's satisfaction with the outcomes. Because if we start doing that, I bet the west will not do well with this metric to measure democracy. There is even a Harvard study that look at the results of US government policies and concluded that most of those policies benefit the upper class, super wealthy, even concluding that if you just based on the results, America is a plutocracy, not a democracy. Less than half of the American people have confidence in their government to do right by them because US government policies from local, to state to federal seldom benefit the people and their economic situation. It's where the concept of Occupy Wall St, and the One-percenter comes from. People know that the US government is not working for them. So how is that even a democracy? Because they can vote for anything? Pleasssseeee...
On the other hand, there are countries that are ruled mostly by a single party or do not have much opposition but their policies and laws have resulted in tremendous uplifting of their people, and they continue to govern with the public's interests as top priority. The people are generally satisfied with their government's performance so they don't find really a need to vote them out. In other examples, they might have stronger parity of powers within their political system but their people still generally believe in their system to deliver real results so their politics are still less insane and more effective than American politics.
I think there should be think tanks in China established to rethink the notion of democracy and redefine it so it reflect reality and results, instead of superficial criteria like having oppositions and adopt an American style political adversarial system as the standard to define democracy. There should be a new metric of measurement: Results of policies / Will of the people. The perfect democratic government should approach 1, because it will mean the policies reflect the people's will and the efficiency of these policies to deliver results. I think America and some western countries will score very low on this metric. Ultimately, that metric will bypass the control that the powerful and wealthy over their country's politics and media (eg. America) and actually show without a doubt who is really in charge in that country.
We have to reclaim democracy for ourselves, like how oppressed people reclaim the objects of their oppression and over come them.
4
-
@ex0duzz CNA also neglected to point out these disputes over claims in SCS are claims that SE Asia nations made during the time when China was the weakest in the time period after the CPC won. After decolonization of SE Asia and the reestablishment of these SE Asian nations, these nations have a little bit of navy so they went out to stake their claims on these islands when China was too weak to challenge those claims because Mainland China had no navy to do so. Now China is back on the world's stage, they are reclaiming those islands that have been under China's rule or influence for centuries.
Everyone drew their own dash lines but somehow it is China's lines that offends everyone. Instead of settling the issue like adults, Philippines chose hostility because it think big bro US will back them. Not even Vietnam wants to go to war over these islands, and Malaysia is happily selling whatever they drilled up or fished up in SCS to China and China is happily buying them. So the only one who has a problem with China's coast guard is Philippines and it is because they choose to be America's lap dogs, not because they are right or moral.
China made those claims, SE Asian nations made their claims. The best way is to settle them bilaterally, or as a bloc with negotiations or even through UN apparatuses. China is indisputably a superpower now, and unlike the US has conducted themselves with diplomacy with whoever. It is immensely tone-deaf to reduce China to another third-rate power or an imperialistic power and treat them as such, just because you get brainwashed by western propaganda. China has settled all its land disputes peacefully (even with Russia) except for India because India chose hostility. So it is a FACT that China always chooses the peaceful route as long as the other side is willing to negotiate in good faith.
If you choose hostility against China and lose (and you will lose, almost guaranteed in any confrontation), then you squandered the chance to gain a win-win solution and you will be in a far worse position when you inevitably have to negotiate with China anyway. So choosing hostility against China is not only st*pid, it is wrong and immoral against the best interests of your country when diplomacy would have been the easier and more equitable option.
4
-
One important point that should be made is the difference between East Asian culture of manhood Vs American.
In anime, you will see a quirky thing is that somewhere along the story, the protag will be asked, "what are you trying to protect (mamoru)? Why do you want to be strong?"
This goes directly to a large part of East Asia cultures (Japan, China, Korea etc.) is that you are not alone and you derive your greatest strength from service and selflessness. Protecting something or someone is what gives you conviction and determination.
In contrast, this is very very different from American culture where media aimed at teenagers tends to be all about bursting out of your shell and leaving everything and everyone behind, including your family, friends and most importantly any social and civic obligations. It is always about what you want, but it is never about what your role can be. Now of course, there are always exceptions to the rule, like the American cultural obsession with military service, but it generally holds. OTOH, in East Asian cultures, the struggle between finding yourself and finding your role in life is always examined in teenage media. It is always a balance between oneself and one's dreams and one's obligations to others.
For East Asians, happiness and fulfillment comes from connecting with people, family, friends, lovers and reconciling that with oneself. The individual is part of the collective and the collective is more than the sum of the individuals. It is very different from the toxic, hyperindividualism in America and western culture in general. It is about not being alienated from your community while maintaining one's own individuality. Which is why in most shounen media, the protag usually achieve his ultimate strength when he is with his people, lifting them up while they lift him up. That's why "mamoru" and "nakama power" are troupes in Japanese media. It is through the harmonious integration of everyone's strength and their understanding of their roles and genuine bonds that true power can be achieved. Cooperation and selflessness and harmony are built into East Asian cultures.
These concepts are antithetical to American culture.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@stormsj That's the thing that westerners are chronically ignorant or deliberately refused to understand on how China looks at the Taiwan issue. I think it's deliberate because they are terminally unable to accept that China is doing great and is innovative, creative, dynamic and powerful. So of course they are going to control information flow. If those Americans who like to denigrate, insult and look down on China will to visit Shenzhen one day, they will either be shell-shocked, or gibbering in terror. "The white man is not on the top anymore!!!"
Th thing is China doesn't NEED Taiwan to keep growing and progressing. What Taiwan represent is a wound that have not been healed. It's a political issue, not an economic one. But the Chinese are in no hurry to reunify with Taiwan and they ultimately don't even need TSMC. All China really wants is peaceful reunification and they can wait 10, 20, 50, even a 100 years to do that.
But everyone and their dogs in the west talk like China can never have advanced chip technology without Taiwan or the west. Taiwan is a small little province. If you really know China, then Taiwan really is more like a 2nd rate, chronically mismanaged provincial backwater.
All US sanctions do is solidify China's conviction and determine, and accelerate their progress because they can centrally planned to focused on project deemed as strategically important. Now you just force China to push their best and brightest to come up with innovative solutions to solve intractable problems. And everyone who bet against China from succeeding on their national project always lose.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@rujotheone I think the most obvious way is to keep the USD in your own commercial banks. China used to keep USD in the PBOC and reinvest them in buying US treasuries. To buy these treasuries, the USD has to flow back into the US financial system (ie. Wall Street).
So instead of doing that, they set up their OWN banks to deal with the USD they have, and from other countries trading and dealing in USD. So with their own financial system, their own fintech like CIPS, they can safely move huge amount of USD which are all legal tender without ever letting them flow back into Wall St.
If what Kevin says is right, China is basically setting up a second USD financial system for clearing USD. This means they can take in USD in deposits, escrow them, trade using them, invest using them, loans made in USD etc., and Wall St and the US government will never know where and how these USD are being moved around since these trades are never done in the US or Europe or in any western affiliated financial institutes.
4
-
I'm from Singapore, I say if the Europeans want to kill each other, let them. If the Europeans are spineless enough to be used by the Americans in their proxy wars and be drained of their wealth, industry and tech, let them. If the west refuse to learn from its past mistakes and seek wisdom elsewhere and is now on the path of self-destruction, let them. It couldn't happen to nicer people.
We are doing fine here, working with everyone, being friends with everyone and always seek peaceful win-win scenarios, always seek prosperity for all, and reject all the mentality spectrum domination so beloved by the Europeans and Americans. Don't come and ask us for help for something you did to yourself. And if you come seeking to plunge our part of the world into war and chaos, and want to dominate us again, we will side with the side that reject that.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
China is already too big, too well developed, too strong to be contained and sanctioned. It has the largest industrial capacity, the biggest cohorts of college graduates of all levels in the world, an established R&D environment in every field of science and tech, and even humanities, a burgeoning economy with the largest middle income population in the world, and is the largest trading partner with most countries in the world.
It cannot be contained because China is already highly integrated in the world in economy, science, diplomacy, military and is member of various large cooperatives and organizations. No matter what kind of things you deny China, they will just go around and buy it from other countries, or developed it on their own or jointly with other countries. US trying to contain China will be trying to contain an ocean when you are a lake.
All China have to do is wait and not make any dumb mistakes, and given their history for the past 20-30 years, they are not likely to do so. Sooner or later, the capitalistic imperialism of the collective west, especially America is going to create a massive blowback from the rest of the world. A critical mass of discontent among the world is going to reach a boiling point as America will keep taking more and more draconian measures against any rising powers challenging its hegemony, and that critical mass is going to be backed by a weakening American empire along with the increasing power of the countries they are trying to suppress, and we are going to see the world turn against America. How it will proceed is unpredictable. Maybe a world war where the world goes to war with America and whatever allies it has left, or America collapses under its own weight. But the end result is that America will fall and loses all the privileges it currently enjoys.
4
-
4
-
It is not that difficult to see where the hate comes from. US politics has always been based on neoliberal ideologies, that the US government must have hegemony over the world and the corporate institutions form the backbone of US economy and power. That hegemony allows the US government, and by extension American corporations, to act with near impunity. They have done so since the end of WWII. You could say the Chinese government is doing the same thing but it is actually not that relevant. What is relevant is the thought process behind advancing and preserving American hegemony: they know if America loses that hegemony, American corporations will be relegated to second tier institutions. They will have to compete on equal grounds with the Chinese and they will not be able to enjoy the power, prestige and command over the world's economy and thus unable to exploit other countries and peoples with impunity.
Losing that power, even the possibility, is driving the corporate world of America insane. That's why you see so much hostility from western media and the US government. They don't want to lose that power to exploit with impunity and they know that they themselves can be targeted fro exploitation and RETALIATION from their victims if they cannot control everything.
I think most Americans can get used to a multipolar world where they are not automatically by default being catered to. But some Americans, especially conservatives and the power with wealth and power, a multipolar world is nightmarish. Imagine an American billionaire arrested in Ghana for exploiting the country and subjected to Ghanian laws, because Ghana has the economic strength to resist the US government. from China's backing. The victims of American exploitation and meddling will have the power to prosecute the Americans responsible for it, and there is nothing the US government or the west can do about it because if they tried to intervene like they did before, the collective economic and military might of the new bloc of nations lead by China will block them.
That is the core of their hatred. They know a strong and an increasing influential China will deny them that power.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
I'm not one for conspiracy theories because once you get into it, you can become irrationally obsessed with finding patterns that are not there.
That being said, the west and especially the US government has a proven track record of meddling in other countries' internal affairs, one of which is to sow chaos, create instability for regime changes. This happened to Iran to Mossadegh's government and we all know what happened since then. It has also been used in numerous Central and South American countries.
The sudden appearance and the "mascot-like" A4 paper theatrics is very suspicious indeed, even without the whole accent thing. As far as I can tell from youtubers who live in China, protests there tend to be more spontaneous and lack organization partly because the CPC is very good at letting people's steam off and controlling the social media so highly organized protests are rare. Whether you agree with this policy is beside the point, because this seem very contrived and that should be a reg flag for false flag operation for any observers.
It may or may not be a false flag op, we just have to keep an eye out and ear to the ground and not irrationality override logic and dispassionate objectivity. In any case, the slow move from zero-covid is likely to accelerate to opening of China, even if it is just to prevent the west from exploiting a potential source of social unrest.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@Liboch Yes, but the fact that almost the entire world defies the US is a sight to behold. If this was 30 years ago, heck, even 20 years ago, this sight would be unthinkable. It really points to the waning power of the American empire.
Singapore should take very serious note about the decline of American hegemony and its moral standing among the world and adjust our foreign policies accordingly.
Depending on the US to do the right and respect another country's sovereignty as they get more and more desperate to hold onto their hegemony will be a fool's errand.
Last thing is that while Singapore is very westernized, the government must take into account that even though our Muslim brothers and sisters are generally quiet and mostly respect and trust the government's direction, there is no way that behind closed doors, at the dinner table, or even at the hawker table, they are not displeased with the way the white American, mostly Evangelical Christian extremist hegemony is unaliving their brothers and sisters in Palestine.
The Singapore government must be aware that Singapore's sovereignty extend to all citizens and if a large portion of the citizens are not happy with the foreign policies, then they must adjust accordingly to reflect the will of the people or else risk becoming delegitimize in the eyes of the citizens. I'm sure a lot of non-Muslim Singaporeans feel the same way about what's happening in Gaza. This is a clear and gross violation of basic human morality and it doesn't matter how much the US threatens us or how much money we make with Israeli companies or buy their military tech, it will be for naught if those deals will results in deep divisions and displeasure from the people.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
It's a capitalism issue. The people interviewed all said roughly the same reasons why the Japanese are not having more children: not enough money, interferes with work, both parents work, though the women taking of the household is still a cultural relic from the past. In other words, the lack of stability and security, especially financial, and way way too much work, that ultimately make people not to want to get married and have children.
It is the relentless pursuit of profits in capitalism that shaped the society into what it is today. The companies demand more and more from their workers, while paying less and less to maximize profits, all the while producing all sorts of distractions (so many things to do in Tokyo) that just alienate people. The interview with the two ladies is very revealing: one wants to have children but not get married, the other wants to get married but not have children. Both scenarios is about trying to wrest some control over their lives that have been taken over by work, and distractions (ie. alienation). The interview with the two guys really brings home the point: more work, less pay, less sex, kids are financial burdens.
This is caused by capitalism.
4
-
4
-
Because research (ie publications and citations) becomes prestige, and prestige is one of the most important criteria when you finally have to job hunt. The difference between having a degree from an Ivy League college vs a state college is tremendous when you are looking for a job. Prestige is, as unfortunate as it is, a heuristic for hiring managers to make up their mind on the worth of your degree and thus your perceived ability when looking through hundreds of job applications. The Harvard applicants are going to go on the top of the pile, even if you had a great time at your no name state college and was taught by great teachers and have done numerous undergrad research projects, and you are a well balanced, hardworking person with interesting hobbies, wonderful personality and leadership qualities.
Like it or not, Chinese students understand the practicality of having that name on their degree, which is why in order to stand out among millions of students graduating every year, they need to get into that few selected schools. Tuition costs? Quality of teaching (an unmeasurable criteria)? Student life satisfaction? Type of classes? Exposure? Nah, those are all pointless. That school name on your degree is what open doors in your life and Chinese students, and east Asian students to a certain extent understand that deeply. It's the difference between being a grunt for your life or get into the C-suite, and no one is going to wager that on frivolous criteria. It is why the world is so shitty.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
The Chinese government plans for 100 years into the future, and their priority is the revitalization of the country, the long term sustainability of its economy, delivers prosperity and promises to her people. To do that, they have to consider the longevity of that industry, the benefits it can bring to the people, the jobs it can create, the potential for developing new technologies from that targeted industry, the long term environmental impact the industry has, the benefits it bring to society, etc., not just ROI.
It is why China will emerge dominant in the long run, because it is not just interested in the ROI within the next 3 quarters, it is only interested in building a sustainable economy and prosperity for ALL, not just for the rich and powerful.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@fdjw88 That's not as fool proof as you want to believe. Yes, a lot of those debts are owe within America and a large portion is owe to other government apparatus. But no matter who hold the debts, they still have to be repaid with interests when they matured.
You can certainly print money to inflate it away but that inflation also means the actual value of the interest that the American people are trying to make from lending the money is also gone. Which means in the end, no new capital is really generated, and the American people are left to prop up the inflation.
Ultimately, you can't escape the fact that debts that are not backed by real things like commodities and produced value are not real. You print money, you inflate it, you are just passing the burden to the creditor and if the creditors are American people themselves, you are just destroying their capital and the American people get poorer holding onto American debt. Somewhere, some time, someone will left holding the bag.
This will just make life even harder for the American people because the value they produced and invested in their own government's debts are diluted away, stolen by corporations (mostly non-productive industries like MIC and healthcare) which benefited from charging high prices for their goods and services on the government that took on these debts in the first place.
This is the kind of thinking that convinced me that America is on the decline and it won't bounced back because the Americans themselves do not understand or refuse to understand the hole they are digging themselves into.
In the end, you don't deserve the standard of living that you enjoy because you don't produced enough useful stuff to justify it. Eventually, you will have to pay for it, probably with generations of stagflation and social chaos and exploitation by your own oligarchs. It will be sad, but it will just poetically just.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Calling the post WWII an age of compassion is so Americo-Eurocentric. Post WWII world was not very compassionate to South America, Africa, and Asia. They continue to suffer under European colonization, and then dismantling of the old colonialism and then being driven into neocolonialism of IMF, World, the USD dominance, CIA destabilization, regime change, color revolutions and deliberate suppression of development for the Global Majority.
This Age of "Aggression" is just the late stage capitalism's inherent contradictions coming to a boil and we are no longer able to ignore it. Add to the fact that the rise of the Global Majority, especially China, the resurgence of Russia, the growing independence of the colonized and suppressed countries like the BRICS, and other nations, the contradictions are becoming sharper and sharper with each passing year. Age of indifference? That's just the next step of globalized capitalism moving into the rent-seeking, harvesting mode.
The western liberal capitalist oligarchs are panicking as they scramble to decide whether to keep trying to suppress the Global Majority or join them.
Uplifting 800 over millions people out of poverty, creating policies that are people-centric, based on common prosperity and then connecting the world in a vast trade network so the world can be lifted by a rising tide, the age of compassion did not end in the west. It shifted to China.
Everything that is happening in the west today is predicted by Marx, Engels, Lenin, Mao and other Marxist thinkers. The fact that almost all westerners, even intellectuals like Dr. Murphy cannot see it is exactly why they keep getting it wrong in the 21st century and why the west is in terminal decline.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The WESTERNERS are surprised, not all of us. We who live outside the western corpo-state media bubble always know China cannot be underestimated and a domestic 7nm node is just a matter of time and probably sooner than we expect. Tge WESTERNERS and their media are the ones who is tooting their own horns saying that the sanctions have destroy China's high tech industry and the Chinese are all sheepie and and stupid and only know how to steal tech and never able to create anything new or innovate and all slaves the seeseepee and Chairman Xi and they eat babies or something. Sure, western industry insiders know better but they are not the ones controlling the media or trying to get reelected in the midst of a global recession and a war.
So yea, we are not surprised at all. Maybe a little at how fast they got here. Remember that 3 years ago when Huawei got sanctioned and China lost access to the most cutting edge lithography machines, we all thought that they are at least 10-15, maybe even 20 years behind. And now they are merely 5 years behind the most cutting edge node. Every time the west tried to cut off China from something, everyone predicts they will be generations, decades behind. Then, they launch their own rockets, then their own heavy lift and now they have their own space station. 20 years ago, everyone think China's domestic jet engine industry is 40 years behind the west, then they shrink that to 20 within a decade, then to just one generation within another 10 years. Now they have the WS-15 that can allow the J-20 to supercruise and is only is behind western engines in lifespan.
People who bet against China always lose.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The west, as usual, will cherry pick data points for their own narratives. They keep saying China is going to collapse, and that China's population is declining will also lead to its collapse. But they deliberately ignore graphs like this that show that the real estate is being deliberately imploded to make way for high tech, high value and sustainable industries like semiconductors, renewable and nuclear energy, EVs, etc. They also deliberately ignore the fact that China is adopting automation robotics at a ferverish pace, and investing heavily in robotics (another high value industry) that is now bearing fruit. Not to mention they are investing in the tool making industries like lithography, solar and wind power tools, 4th gen nuclear power designs, batteries maunfacturing, hydrogen generation, etc.
This is the superiority of a system where the government can control the capital and have the power to do centralized planning for years, to move them where the country needs it the most, and to develop industries where they will never be developed if left to private sector to do so. This is how the government can create a dynamic economy and crush any rent-seeking behavior that takes value and capital out of the productive sectors and hoard by capitalists. This is how they break the cycle of boom and bust by de-leveraging and reduce capacity where it is over-built and reinvest that capital and capacity elsewhere before a bubble pop by itself and hurting millions of people. Capitalism cannot accomplish this, it has to "self-correct" during a bust cycle, destroying lives while the rich get richer and then repeat itself again.
3
-
The US GDP is mostly based on virtual economy in financial gambling and useless things like weapons. You take away the financial market that are beyond normal healthy banking activities, the weapons manufacturing, the healthcare costs, and the stock market inflated with printed money, its economy is far far smaller than it appears. You're telling that a company like Huawei and BYD that are dominating their industries, producing high value, high tech products have lower market cap than Tesla and Nvidia? That alone should tell you how fake the numbers coming out of the US are. Very few industries in US is based on the real world.
That's why everything is so puzzling at first glance but if you look at it objectively and count only actually useful things like factories producing useful consumable products, farm that produce food, useful services that generate value as the real economy, then everything is clear. The US economy is fake, it is inflated with fake money, and inflated numbers. It's not that difficult to understand it once you have some class consciousness, and well versed in Marxist economics.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Err... no one is an ally with the US except the phillppineess and we all know that's because bong bong is a US puppet. China is not aggressive. They make claims now that they can back it up because back then they were not a naval power since the fall of Qing dynasty. They have historical claims there because China always had a presence in the SCS. Every country will make claims on any piece of land that they can. You can either go to war or negotiate.
Since the signing of the Indonesia's initiative last year, China and every SE Asian country now has a framework for bilateral negotiations to settle any claims and dispute in the SCS. All except bong bong because the US is telling bong bong to choose hostility. When everyone is able to do something peacefully and you are the odd one out, then the problem lies with the phillioppiness and the US, not with China or the rest of SE Asia.
No one in SE Asia wants a SE Asia NATO because no one wants bloc politics and ideological divides to create unnecessary tension and China respect that. The only ones who is not respecting SE Asia's sovereignty to want peace is the US and the west who are trying to start wars and conflicts in this region so everyone goes down with China. We know what the US is trying to pull, and so does China. So no, there won't be a SE Asia NATO, they won't be a SE Asia bloc that will be hostile to China because China gives us no reason to. Everything you have heard about how China is aggressive and SE Asia is worried are literal lies and misinformation because I live here and no one wants war. No one think China is being aggressive. Everyone knows their roles and place.
If SE Asia nations truly think China is a threat, then the Quad and AUKUS won't just include the Us, UK, Aust and India. It would have include SE Asian countries because we would have requested to join. But we didn't, and that should already tell you that SE Asia countries have a neutral or friendly relationship with China. No one here really wants to join your little bully club.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
It is nauseating to still hear an America talking about the US wanting to spread democracy, as though they simply just want to bring freedom to everyone.
First that assume that the US is indeed brining freedoms and democracy. No it doesn't, it bring captialism and nowadays, neoliberal capitalism. Democracy is always a very distanced second, third priority at best. Most of the time, it brings death and destruction and oppression.
Second, it makes the assumption that only the western system is democratic, as though the Chinese is not a democracy, it Cuba, or any non western liberal system. That's BS. China is a democracy, so is Cuba, so is Vietnam. If we want the west and especially the US to be able to exist peacefully, the west needs to drop their self righteousness and convenient definitions of democracy and accept other forms of governance and systems as equally valid. They need to shift their thinking from that they are the only moral arbitrators to they are just another system.
Or else, f*ck off.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
And China learnt that lesson. Like in War Games, the only way to win is not to play this sick game. No one wants a new Cold War but we can all see, even the Europeans can see that America is the one trying to start one. What China is going to do from all these messaging, is that they acknowledge that the US is coming for them, so they will no longer ONLY seek diplomatic resolutions, but will also use harder techniques. But they will also not get drawn into a debilitating Cold War, so they will continue to be open and build deeper diplomatic ties with other countries, even the Europeans.
The only way to win a Cold War is to not get suck into it like what the Soviets did and keep building ties and blocs with everyone everywhere. America might be able to contain China if China retreats completely and become isolationist. But it cannot contain the entire world. China now is the number one trading partner with nearly every country in the world and its economy can only keep becoming more and more developed, its cultural influence spread further and its diplomatic ties deeper.
On the other hand, America is in constant political chaos and social dysfunctionality and its economy is built on a house of cards. Somewhere along the line, something gonna give, a pillar is going to collapse and America will find itself more and more isolated as it start to lose friends left and right. This time around, America might just find itself surrounded by unfriendly people because more and more countries are getting fed up with their foreign policies and past crimes.
3
-
3
-
This is why the US want to amend the non-weaponization of space to specifically said no WMDs. This implicitly means that OTHER weapons are fair game, as long as they are not nukes. US launching anti-satellites satellites, perhaps armed with space launching conventional warhead missiles can thus target other countries' satellites, like the ones mentioned here. Of course, the US is free to copy Chinese electronic warfare satellites and the same kind of ki__-chain system, IF they have a working anti-ship hypersonic missile that can match China's ones.
It is perhaps poetic justice because back in the late 90s, the US sent EW planes to fly up and down China's coastlines to spoof China's radars, giving them false signals and making the Chinese believe they are under a massive attack. It caused the PLA to scramble hundreds of jets to intercept these incoming jets only to find out they are "ghosts". It was the US way of humiliating the Chinese and to tell them that they can't match US technologies and tactics. After that, the Chinese became adamant at fast tracking their technological advancement in military and especially in Electronic Warfare. That was the era of China's rapid expansion of its military and going through reforms and doing lots of experiments - like that whole series of destroyers before they settled on Tuye 052 series and 055.
Now the table has turned and the PLA has some of the most formidable EW suites for both defense and offense, and they are putting EW even on satellites. It might come one day, that it is the US military getting their radar spoof and they have to scramble their jets only to find out the Chinese have fooled them..
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@barnabusdoyle4930 You're missing the point. The country of the USA, whether it is private or government, the system itself, the culture itself, the society itself, the people itself, cannot build a HSR. The country itself doesn't know how to solve that problem and the way things are done there also make it impossible to solve these problems, culturally, socially, politically, economically.
Arguing about whether it is the government or private companies' fault is like arguing whether shooting someone dead, or cutting their throat is less or more bad kind of murder. It's still murder.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@DarkSideChess No it is not. You are just used to fahrenheit. In Celsius, -20 is omg this is cold as hell, -10 is damn cold, 0 is freezing, 10 is fridge, 20 is nice room temp, 25 is quite warm, 30 is pretty warm, 35 is god damn hot, and 40 is WTF! There is no confusion. But I can also tell you that 40 is nice shower temp, 50 is lukewarm water, 60 you can slow cook meat, 70 and above is scalding hot, and 100 is "you make tea" boiling water.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
It's not just Russia recovering. China is also recovering faster than the west. Another YT channel that focused on economics, pointed out that the export for China has grown by 7.1% just this quarter alone and that the PMI has risen to 53 from 49 previously. PMI is the measure of manufacturing orders and pricing and anything above 50 means the country's manufacturing is growing. I think all western countries including Japan and South Korea are experiencing a contraction of PMI.
China growth is not even driven primarily by domestic consumption but by the aforementioned growth in exports. It means even in a slowing global demand, people around the world are still buying more Chinese goods than western goods, so it's a double loss for the west.
China is still facing a lot of problems but their foundation is strong because they have a dynamic and highly diversified economy that dominates nearly every industry, science and technology. So they have plenty of capital, plenty of industrial capacity, plenty of skilled labor, plenty of scientific output and now have secured enough food and cheap energy for their growth. When you look at China's fundamentals, all the other problems look very solvable, whether it is the real estate (which the Chinese government deliberately pop), semiconductors, or anything else.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Sean, you cannot pretend you do not understand why the US is so obsessed with China. They are obsessed with China because China is the preeminent power that can break their neoliberal world order they have enjoyed since crooked nixon and Alzheimer reagan. They are scared sh*tless at the prospect that they cannot dominate the world economy and dictate to everyone what to do, and loot, exploit, pillage and commit violence and unspeakable atrocities to the world as they see fit. Their worst nightmare is seeing that they will be held accountable for their exploitation, war crimes and crimes against humanity. Imagine one day that we get to try a US president, or congressman at the ICC and hang them for war crimes. They know if they do not control the economy as it is today, that reality will come for them sooner or later, and I bet it is sooner.
So let's stop pretending the US actions are unfathomable. They are panicking because they know if they become weak enough, we will come knocking on their doors and demand justice. They are going to nuke China before they allow that to happen. They will kill hundreds of millions of people before they allow that to happen. All the debts and bonds and whatever do not matter if we are all dead, and you better believe that the neocons will do it.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@basook6116 I don't disagree with you. I just want to point out that a vibrant society needs smart people to take on every kind of role. We need physicists and we also need sociologists and philosophers. But yes. there is typically less market demand for social science and humanities graduates.
The people who studied society, culture, economics, are essential to help us shaped our society correctly according to that society's values. We need conscientious, moral, intelligent truth seekers to tell us how we can make our society better, more fair, more happy. You might feel gender studies in the west is "wokeness" but it has helped normalize LGBT. In the past, western societies used to chemically castrate gays and beat them up. Even recently, there is a transgender person murdered in school. The hatred is insane.
Every society has their own values, their own moral barometers and their systems and cultures. Maybe the western way for dealing with these social issues are not suitable for your society but we need these people to figure out what works for our society, and we need them to be smart, empathetic and moral and still quite a number of them. These people who dedicate their lives to studying societies and cultures should be respected.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Agreed. From what the video said, the Chinese scientists used a combination of software and hardware tricks to improve signal to noise ratio of their detection. It seems like what they are doing is to use multiple radars and very fast switching of pulses, maybe even multiple bands, to hit a stealth aircraft from multiple angles, then use sophisticated software to stitch together all the information into a coherent picture. It is clever no doubt and will likely work if the radars sites are positioned well, meaning they can effectively defend a huge area. They might not be able to defend all areas, but definitely the most important sites. The system only need a general outline of the F-22 or F-35 and its speed, altitude and heading to launch interceptors whether they are SAMs or AAMs. Once the interceptors get near the aircraft, probably with mid-course correction too, it can turn on its own active searcher whether it is its own radar, or IR or even both. Within a short enough distance, no stealth can defeat an active AESA radar even if it has a small radar head.
Then it becomes a numbers game. To penetrate this area, you probably will have to launch more than just 1 squadron of stealth jets and more than likely, some of them won't make it home. No longer can the US military penetrate Chinese airspace above important sites with impunity and that will put a dampen on any attempts at belligerency from the US. If the US is really d*mb enough to go hot with China, barring a nuclear exchange, there won't be a lot of F-22s or F-35s left in the initial salvos, much less the 4th gen fighters. Can the US afford this? Can the US even build and train replacements fast enough? I doubt it. Then the deterrence has worked.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Any discussion about the USD system must include how the USD is recycled back to the US as US treasuries and bonds. This is how the US steal every other country's surplus production. Every time you import something to the US, they exchange it with their paper fiat money that they can print out of thin air. Then you have very few choices about what to do with the USD you now have. You can use it to buy other things or you use it to buy US debts to ensure its value is not devalued by inflation. But now you are fully subjected to US monetary policies. If they want to inflate their debts away, they print money and your bond or T-bills can become worth less than before.
There are many levers they are pull to screw any central bank holding USD but the main points are that the US exchange real goods/services for fiat money, and that your value you earned with your labor, your resources is locked into US financial system and you are subjected to their whims and their interests which often do not aligned with yours. Just look at Russian assets being frozen and properly will be stolen by the west. Everything about the USD system is immoral and reduce your country's sovereignty. We use USD because we had no choice, the entire world was trapped in this system. The US has also proven for many years that they are very irresponsible with the way they steward the USD when treasury secretary John Connally saying to the European finance ministers that "the dollar is our currency, but it’s your problem."
Now, we have alternatives which ironically Russia has shown is possible to choose. It's an extreme example of de-dollarization but we all don't need to de-dollarize to this extent, we just have to diversify away form using USD for trade. There is an inflection point where the demand of the USD dropped to the point that the selling of debts require higher interest rate to attract buyers to the point the government cannot service this debt anymore. Then, the whole house of cards is gonna come crashing down.
Don't forget that a large part of the US military's budget comes from this incessant borrowing and it is now going even higher. It is the US military might that is now enforcing the rules of using the USD for trade and even now they are losing that effectiveness because the UKraine war is not going well for the west and there is no way they can invade and regime change China. In the past, they can show up on your doorstep, accuse you of being anti-democratic and against "rule based order" (whatever that mean) and regime-change you. Now they can't do it to the most powerful countries like China, Russia and even India and they are all moving towards de-dollarization. None of the old underhanded tactics worked anymore but they keep doing it. It is a matter of time when the BRICS figured out a system that is equitable to all sides for trade and then offer that real alternative to the world. With the BRICS controlling both the supply (minerals, energy, agriculture) and demand (huge huge markets), they literally can create an alternative market, system that do not require the west at all. At all.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@muhammadriskyramadhan1725 SE Asian nations like yours, Malaysia, Vietnam, Singapore, Thailand and even Myanmar, have dealt with China long enough to know that the Chinese leaders are usually very calm, disciplined, patient and rational actors and they don't want war. As long as the Filipinos do not cross the line of no-return, China is always willing to wait for them to come to their senses. After all, what China has a lot is time and money. Their rise to superpower is inevitable. The ones running out of time to stop the rise of China are the Americans. Sooner or later, any number of the contradictions and unstable elements inherent in the US and the collective west will force them to retreat from our region, and the Philippines will be left holding the bag.
3
-
3
-
3
-
The way I see it is that the US is the most carbon emitting country in history with the Europeans a close 2nd. That historical carbon emission is why we are having climate change, not just the current emission. Climate change has been making these wild fires in recent years more and more insane. This is well known by now. Yet, the US are woefully prepared for such a disaster and in fact has been cutting corners on their firefighting capability.
So when the perfect wild fire strike, fueled by climate change of America's doing, coupled with inadequate firefighting capabilities and short-sighted policies and the cultural and economical cheapness of using wood as building materials, all come together to give the US the karma slap of the decade.
This is in stark contrast to the Chongqing fire just 2 years ago where China mobilize huge amount of resources and the people coming together to literally, physically made firebreaks that stop the fires from reaching the city. Even more relevant is the earthquake in Xizhang that happened almost the same time as the LA fire, and we saw Chinese mobilize their disaster management immediately, reaching the disaster area within hours, and supplies poured in within 24 hours. Tents, firefighting, doctors, medical supplies, heating, all poured into a region thousands of feet above sea level.
It's hilarious too in the background of tiktok getting banned and Americans migrating to Rednote, an even more Chinese social media app and finding out that the Chinese people are nice, welcoming and funny. Even worse, they are finding out that the Chinese don't live in an authoritarian hellscape but instead enjoy affordable healthcare, groceries, world class transportation and safety unheard of in the US. People are posting angry and sad videos on the soon to be banned tiktok and on Rednote, saying how they have been lied to all their lives.
Good luck America, y'all need a revolution.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I think the 2nd phase will never come and should not come, given that the CPC has proven beyond any shadow of doubt that their system, Socialism with Chinese Characteristics has deliver prosperity, strength and rejuvenation of the Chinese civilization beyond anything the previous dynasties has ever achieved. Over 800 million lifted out of poverty and the elimination of absolute poverty, the urbanization and industrialization on the humongous scale that China now produce over 30% of all value in manufacturing, the housing of hundreds of millions, world class infrastructure the most amount of electricity produced ever, the greening of deserts, the taming of the Yellow River, laying down over 50,000 km of high speed rails, leading today up almost all the critical technologies and scientific output, increasing the life expectancy above the US, all because the CPC won the civil war.
There is no way the mainland Chinese will accept the ROC form of government where the politicians are literally descended from Japanese collaborators and they are throwing chairs at each other in parliament. There is no way Taiwan can gain independence today, even if they are willing to go to war. There is no way mainland Chinese will accept Taiwan's independence even if they had to take the island province back by force (they will rather really really not to do so). There is also no way the US (or any European power) will survive a direct kinetic confrontation with China in West Pacific or the economic devastation, and there is no way Japan will throw its own people into the seas to help Taiwan. There is no way any SE Asian countries will participate in that mess.
Also, the PRC is a democracy, so this whole wanting to turn China into a democracy is moot.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Exactly. Russia is also entitled to their national security. If the west refuses to even acknowledge that Russia's security is a legitimate concern, then Russia do not have to acknowledge western expansion right to their doorsteps.
The west need to back the f*ck down and stop thinking that their way is the most right, most moral and thus must be imposed on everyone. It is not the most right, not the most moral nor even the most honorable. Stop this pretension that it is about freedom and democracy because western interventions and expansion of their influence on other countries have rarely resulted in real freedom or democracy. It will even be farcical to say the west stands for freedom and democracy when their system is obviously capitalist hegemony. The freedom and democracy are window dressing meant to placate their population. When push comes to shove, the capitalists always has the last say in any western country's policies and laws. That is not freedom or democracy. We also need to stop this nonsense of framing this war as legitimate fight against tyranny.
Russia's security concerns are legitimate, and should be respected.
The west is not free or democratic and their interventions are seldom for freedom and democracy. They have no moral high ground to present themselves as such.
The Ukraine war is started by the west when they disrespected Russia's security concern. It is a proxy war for western, especially American domination over Russia and is not fought for freedom and democracy. Whether Russia is winning or losing this war does not dispel that the west has acted in bad faith and not for the interests of the Ukrainian people.
The question will not end with the Ukraine war because so long the west and America especially, thinks it is some sort of divine right for them to impose their world order on everyone and disrespect other countries' positions and seek to dominate the rest of the world, there will be another proxy war like this one.
If and when the Americans start a war over Taiwan, and rope the Europeans into it and if the Europeans really followed meekly behind their masters, they will be in for a nasty surprise. If the west really push China into a war, and China finally stop restraining itself, the people of the west will be punished for their transgressions. And the rest of the world will watch.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
That's the problem with western corpo-state media. They put out these unrealistic dumb stuff for propaganda so much that people there no longer have any idea how this stuff actually works. Russia has one of the largest air forces in the world and also some of the most sophisticated integrated air defenses. To beat that, you will probably need hundreds if not thousands of fighters and/or bombers to sweep the battlefields, and be prepared to lose a lot of them to attrition. With the way Russian defenses are set up, you will need thousands of missiles, probably millions of tons of bombs to crack, along with hundreds of thousands of infrantrymen, supported by thousands of IFVs and hundreds of tanks to really attack effectively.
Whatever the west sent to Ukraine is a fraction of a fraction of what they will need to attack these defensive lines. Ukraine does not have the manpower even if they draft every able bodied male into the war. Even then, these kind of preparations will take months, if not years to finish. There is just no way Ukraine can do this realistically after the initial battles have nearly clean out their military and equipment. There is no way these things can be replenished in weeks or months, and no way the west will commit all their assets to Ukraine. It took them years, decades to accumulate these military equipment.
The counter-offensive is a fool's errand because Ukraine has driven itself into a corner politically, diplomatically by aligning with NATO and letting the US used it as a sacrificial pawn against Russia. Now it cannot negotiate with Russia for a conditioned armistice because it no longer has any control over its own politics anymore. The best strategy for Ukraine was never, ever get into the situation where Russia feels it has to do something drastic to protect its national security interests in the very first place.
Now he is going around Europe begging for scraps. I mean approaching the Swedish for Gripens is just getting sad.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I think there should be a new way to measure democracy: the relative distance between a de jure democracy and a de facto democracy. De jure is that on paper and procedural, a country can be democratic, but if it is not measure with de facto democracy.
De facto democracy will measure:
1. the policies that people desire gets enacted vs. policies they don't want or don't care for, will indicate power distribution among the population
2. wealth inequality that indicate how wealth is concentrated,
3. poverty level indicates how fair the overall system is able to redistribute wealth and give prosperity to all,
4. combined 2 and 3 will give us measurement of the utilitarian level of the policies that helps distribution of wealth
5. achieving basic living standards: including true access to education, housing, jobs, savings and retirement, healthcare etc.,
6. labor union power measured against corporate power, pervasiveness of unions and whether unions have enough power for negotations
7. imperialistic tendencies of the countries' foreign policies
8. media independence from powerful influences including government and corporations, to examine the level of propaganda that skewed toward powerful elites, both state and private.
9. measurement of the citizens' information bubble derived from covert and overt propaganda and indoctrination - true measurement of freedom of thought
If you start measuring democracy in the de facto manner, I will bet a lot of money that the US will drop in democracy ranking tremendously. The current way these metrics are measured is absurdly skewed toward de jure democracy that serves to put western countries on a higher moral pedestal that they do not deserve and these fake moral high grounds are weaponized for diplomatic imperialism from the west. Also, take note that non of the defactor democracy measurements are measuring concepts and system implementation. The results are what matters, and it doesn't really matter what system you used to achieve democratic results - ie. policies and results that benefit the most people possible and keep abuses from the wealthy and political elite low.
We will have classification like True Democracy (maybe some Scandinavian countries will qualified) where both the de jure and de facto measurements are high; Superficial Democracy (US, UK and probably most of western Europe, even India) where de jure is high but de facto is low; Practiced Democracy (China, Singapore and some other prosperous countries with stronger dejure authoritarianism) where the de jure is low but de facto is high, and Undemocratic (usually failed states) where de jure is low and de facto is low.
2
-
The problem with the western (or really it is America) worldview is still trying to contain China and preserve its hegemony. A very simple question: whose hegemony?
Is it the hegemony of the people of the west? Or is it really about the hegemony of the capital ruling class and their political lackeys?
Why does every question has to asked in the terms of China being the threat? Threat to who, really?
China is not interested in regime changes, it is not interested in exporting its model and forcing it down your throats. They are not going to meddle in your elections, they are not going to come and demand that your country form a German Communist Party, or a Polish Communist Party, or a French Communist Party. They don't care. It is only interested in its own economic rise and strength so the last two hundreds years of suffering and humiliation will not happen again. You are now dealing with a political elite that consist of highly rational, consistent, extremely intelligent statesmen. They are not stupid asses like ted cruz or MTG. If you work with China, they are more than happy to work with you because they will always want to seek a win-win situation. But if you keep thinking that China is a threat and must be contained, then that is no more than the same colonial mindset that demands that only the west must remain on top.
The hypocrisy and double standards applied to China are shameful, if the west can even feel shame.
China's rise is inevitable and guaranteed at this point. The only question the western world has to ask themselves: are they going to go off the cliff with America to protect American interests, or are they going to finally f*cking grow a spine and adapt to a multipolar world where the center will be in Asia.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@lorainejones41 Yup, the US DOES NOT CARE about Taiwanese lives or their well-being. The island is simply a pawn they are using to poke at China, trying to lure it into a war just like Ukraine. They think that China really only want to dominate just like them, so surely they can be baited into a self-destructive war where the US and its crony vassals can use the excuse to attack China. Western neoliberal, neocon mentality and worldview based on Machiavellian domination cannot fathom international cooperation and win-win foreign policies.
But China knows this and unlike Russia, is in a far better position economically and for security. China does not need Taiwan to secure itself, though it will definitely break the first island chain and it does not need Taiwan to become an economic superpower. It is already an economic superpower. Taiwan is an emotional issue and while emotions can be dangerous in politics, it can also be tempered because China does not need Taiwan materially to succeed. So the US is not getting the result it wants, and they are the ones being materially threatened by China's rise. They are the ones far more desperate than China to start a war because 5, 10 years down the road, the US will be even weaker and China even stronger. This is inevitable.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@_Urahara_Kisuke_ Indeed. LKY was one of those rare individuals who was a true leader. Those who followed him into his government and built this country were themselves highly intelligent and ambitious. But they followed him willingly even when they disagreed with him vehemently because he was able to convince them of his vision, of his leadership and of his passion.
He was not above being a passionate man, even though in many interviews he gave, he always seemed calm, collected, composed and very very sharp. But when he was on the campaign, he was fiery, he was passionate. And he convinced a country that he would everything in his power, with his life to build this country. He convinced them that he combined both intelligent, rationality and passion. I remember watching old videos of him at town hall meetings where he was on fire, he was blasting his opposition, he pointed out their inadequacies, he put forth his visions, his ideas and he punctuated his speech with fire. He was very charismatic, and empathetic. That was the time when PAP had not proven themselves to be the prudent, rational and highly intelligent and competent party. He convinced a country that was just a few years ago had violent racial riots, religious tensions that he can lead all of them fairly, equally and rationally but also with passion to common prosperity. Why should the Malays and Indians gave him their votes. He was Chinese! Worse, a twinkie Chinese (yellow on the outside, white on the inside, his mandarin and dialects were terrible) and he was able to convince those dialect groups, tribalistic Chinese to follow him.
LKY was not a dictator. He earned the trust of his fellow colleagues, and he earned the trust of his countrymen and from there he proved his leadership and earned the admiration and respect from everyone. If he was a dictator, he didn't have to do any of those things. He didn't have to possess any of those traits. He didn't have to use words and the power he imbued in those words to convince people to follow him. He could have just beat up his opposition with his authority.
This is why I don't care much for western opinions on other countries' leaders anymore. Their assessments are typically either ignorant, simplistic, self-serving, culturally insensitive, or done in bad faith.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Only capitalist pigs will think reckless spending and not saving for rainy days is a good thing. Chinese like saving, and that is ultimately better than spending everything. Because a spendthirft society only encourages rampant consumerism,and in turn encourages an out of control capitalist culture that place consumption above all us, creating a dysfunctional soceity that we are all seeing in America and parts of Europe right now. Consumerism has been studied for a long time in western social sciences and the conclusions reached is that such a culture alienates people, creates useless competition among the working class (keeping up with the Joneses/Kardahsians) and enervate the morality of that society. It normalizes toxic individualism and makes people think only spending money and getting material things is the path to happiness. Worse, it brings the capitalist psychopaths that manipulate the public into spending beyond their means, into power. I encourage people to read up on the life of one of the most evil persons ever created by the American capitalist culture: edward bernays.
That's what America is, and China must not replicate such decadence. Revenge spending is an insane and shortsighted and destructive concept and should be vilified. Revenge spending is one of the symptom of the rot that lies at the center of American culture, the fact they can even come out with such an absurd concept. Spending to make yourself feel better is a shit concept.
Savings is GOOD. Savings means redundant capacity. Saving means resilience. It is a concept that capitalists hate with a fervor because a saving society means they cannot loot that money. But a saving culture is a culture that emphasizes on moderation, on restrain, on foresight and that will translate into a culture that emphasize long term health of the society, and not short term quarterly gains. That is a society that endures, that flexes, and become stronger. And capitalists HATE that. They WANT those trillions locked up in Chinese people's bank accounts and they HATE that China's socialistic, cautious culture is too resilient to their manipulation.
2
-
It should also be noted that Confucius established his philosophical baseline in an age of strife - the Spring and Autumn Period. His take on why societies and counties failed is eminently on a non-spiritual side. Other than the Mandate of Heaven, there was not much tradition of using the divine to determine why the world was this way or that way. There are no angels coming down from heaven carrying messages from god, or if Zeus felt peckish that day and decide to punish some mortals for some offenses from long ago. It was just not a big thing in China for these kind of divine intervention on that spiritual level. Instead Confucius opted to look at the human conditions more in the practical and organizational aspects. He wanted to create a foundation at how good governance can occur, ask why states failed, why people revolt, and why bureaucracies fell apart, not about pleasing gods. Pleasing gods comes later when good governance is establishment - aka having the Mandate - and not that pleasing the gods give good governance. You get the Mandate by being a good king/emperor, you don't get it by pleasing Heaven first. Good governance is pleasing to Heaven.
Everything in the Analects is based on the idea that big concept on the state level - government, the bureaucracy - comes from good foundation of small concepts like the family unit - father, mother, children, uncles, cousins, neighbors, community. The concept is a vertical integration of orderliness - father takes care of family, children take care of their parent to the King takes care of the country and the peasants take care of state. If everything happens according to this moral set of values, orderliness will emerge, then everything will fall into place.
Hence why there is such an emphasis on concepts like justice, filial piety, moral righteousness, education because these are what he thought forms a strong foundation to the family unit, and thus to the country unit. There is nothing remotely spiritual as in the supernatural intervention or god pleasing in this viewpoint. Even ancestor worship is a form of ritualized reinforcement of humility, that one must remember the past wisdom to govern the future. It is however very logical and very practical in its mentality, and approaches and provide one of the first complete thought processes on how a state can operate on a gigantic scale. It is probably why the Han dynasty adopted Confucianism and it became the bureaucratic foundation and thought process of China like what Christianity and the concept of sin did for the west. Creating a good, sturdy and just bureaucracy is the point. Creating order out of chaos through human agency is the point. This is a very crucial viewpoint.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Sometimes I wonder if Sean is really very smart or he is very tunnelled vision because he focused primarily on economics, finance and see the world only through these narrow lenses. Canada becoming the 51st state of the US is not a deal, it is annexation. I don't if he understands what annexation actually means. Granted that Canada is a vassal of the US empire in all but name, but at least they can maintain some semblance of sovereignty and independence. Demanding another country to willingly surrender and become part of an empire is not a deal, it is literally declaring war on that country. You know, like missiles flying, tanks rolling, gun firing war, millions dead kind of war. No country, no matter how meek or weak is going to submit to another without a fight.
Sean, why do you think countries like China, the old Soviet Union, even North Korea have nuclear weapons, and why Iran wants one. Because they are willing to use it to ensure their sovereignty. Economic pain is pain, becoming a state of the US empire is death.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@MSDGroup-ez6zk Just because they are ethnically India does not mean they care about Indians or the Global South. kamala harris was oppressive to minorities when she was a prosecutor because she wanted to appear tough on crime and that appeals to white people. You think she gives a rat's a** to India? You think sunak or whoever the ceo of the world bank gives a sh*t to the poor, downtrodden and exploited people of the Southern Hemisphere?
Nah, harris, sunak, and whoever in the power in the west, they are PART OF THEIR SYSTEM. They will kill Indians just as well as Chinese, or Nigeriens or Brazilians. They will protect the neoliberal capitalists (mostly white people) in their own country before they protect you and me. India won't see a shilling from the UK so long the west stands. Until you march an army up to the steps of Westminister, put the PM of UK in chains, they don't care about you beyond how to exploit India against China. These people are monsters, and you don't deal with monsters by appealing to their feelings for their ancestral lands.
India needs to stand with China, stand with the rest of the BRICS+, with the SCO. It is the only way to break them, and obtain real justice from the west.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Err... no one is an ally with the US except the phillppineess and we all know that's because bong bong is a US puppet. China is not aggressive. They make claims now that they can back it up because back then they were not a naval power since the fall of Qing dynasty. They have historical claims there because China always had a presence in the SCS. Every country will make claims on any piece of land that they can. You can either go to war or negotiate.
Since the signing of the Indonesia's initiative last year, China and every SE Asian country now has an accelerated framework for bilateral negotiations to settle any claims and dispute in the SCS. All except bong bong because the US is telling bong bong to choose hostility. When everyone is able to do something peacefully and you are the odd one out, then the problem lies with the phillioppiness and the US, not with China or the rest of SE Asia. No one in SE Asia wants a SE Asia NATO because no one wants bloc politics and ideological divides to create unnecessary tension and China respect that.
The only ones who is not respecting SE Asia's sovereignty to want peace is the US and the west who are trying to start wars and conflicts in this region so everyone goes down with China. We know what the US is trying to pull, and so does China. So no, there won't be a SE Asia NATO, they won't be a SE Asia bloc that will be hostile to China because China gives us no reason to. Everything you have heard about how China is aggressive and SE Asia is worried are literal lies and misinformation because I live here and no one wants war. No one think China is being overly aggressive. Assertive? Sure. Aggressive? No. If SE Asia nations truly think China is a threat, then the Quad and AUKUS won't just include the Us, UK, Aust and India. It would have include SE Asian countries because we would have requested to join. But we didn't, and that should already tell you that SE Asia countries have a neutral or friendly relationship with China. No one here really wants to join your little club.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
What exactly does the US think is going to happen?
First, they branded China as enemy number one, and then begin a campaign of slanders, rumors, provocations and attacks, all designed around trying to bait China into destroying itself over Taiwan. The problem is that the American mind cannot fathom how China can endure such indignity and kept their cool. If China is ruled by the type of people that rule the US (IE the oligarchs and their political cronies) they would have invaded Taiwan and sprung the trap. But China didn't. China did not make such an elemental mistake and it is driving the US crazy.
Now they want to make up with China? After the cynical attempts to destroy China? Outside the western corpo-state media bubble, everyone can clearly see that it is the US that is provoking a war over Taiwan, the same in Ukraine. No one buys that Xinjiang, Tibet and HK bullshit, much less that the Americans care about Taiwan's freedom and its people.
It's like a school bully that keeps on poking you, slandering you, insult you, spread rumors about you and then have the sheer audacity to turn around and ask you to loan him some lunch money. Any person with any self esteem will demand the bully to apologize first before loaning him money. Or else, why even pick up the phone when it is clear that the US is insincere and aggressive.
2
-
2
-
They sleep very well.
And now they want to provoke a war with China, the country with the most industrialized economy, and is already most advanced in tech in several critical areas. Meanwhile, the west can't make enough shells for Ukraine for a conflict that Russia did not even fully commit all their resources.
Yea, you might be able to intercept 1, 2 or maybe 4 hypersonic missiles. Well, how about 50, 100, 500, or even 1000 missiles coming in from all direction, from all altitudes, hypersonics, ballistics, air launched, land launched, ship launched, sub launched? Can you defend against that? Because if it is an all out war, barring a nuclear war, that is the kind of industrial capacity that China can bring to bear. The 7th fleet will be at the bottom of the ocean, along with CdG, QE/PoW and all other prides of the west.
Also, the war in Ukraine is caused by the west. Russia reacted to a clear and present threat after 2014 coup. You pushed other countries' redlines, especially one powerful enough to resist you, and you expect no consequences? The arrogance and delusion of the west is witnessed here when they can say the Russia is the one who caused the war. We outside the western corpo-state media bubble see the truth quite clearly.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
He was a crook but he was not wrong. Chinese leaders care deeply about the well-being of the Chinese people and security of their country. Why shouldn't any leadership do that?
That is not to say that they don't care about their Marxist-Leninist approach to economy and governance but they apply that mostly within China. Their foreign policy has always been non-interventionist because they know they can't control the world and frankly they aren't interested in it. Their attitude is if you want to be communist, well good for you and they will call your comrade. If you want to be a capitalist, well that's a shame. But as long as you are willing to trade and treat them with respect and fairness, they are wiling to work with you with respect and fairness, and they have proven it time and time again on their foreign policies and projects like BRI and BRICS, SCO etc., despite western corpo-state media's constant untruthful spins. If you want to learn from China's success, they are willing to teach you but they will always say you have to find your own way to suit your own circumstances. If you threaten China, they will try to make peace but they refuse to be bullied.
It is a very rational, respectful and agreeable approach to international relationships. They won't demand that you change your ways, your lifestyles, your economic system, or your politics to deal with them. They won't attached unnecessary political strings to their loans and partnerships. They are certainly not interested in dominating you or take your economic rights to your resources and land. They can always just buy stuff from you as long as you are willing to trade. They also expect the same from you.
It is not difficult to deal with China. All you have to do is be honest and fair and take their long history into account and don't try to denigrate, humiliate, and look down on them. No one today is in any position, strength or moral standing to denigrate, humiliate and look down on the Chinese people.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
This video really encapsulate the core propaganda message of the US government. Around the world, in forums like reddit, the most oft thing you will hear is "I'm not against the Chinese people, I'm against the Chinese government or CCP." There is a concentrated effort to separate the Chinese people from their government, to convince them and the rest of the world that the villain here is the Chinese government, not China.
It is a convenient excuse and a clever tactic. By separating the Chinese people from their government, you can achieve a few things.
First, it give us the possibility that you can cause chaos in China by making the Chinese people raised up against their government, and it doesn't matter if the Chinese government really do deserve to be overthrown. The goal is to sow the seeds of doubt that all the results achieved by the Chinese people and their government is not real, or not enough, or that someone else can do better without considering who that someone else is.
Second, it makes America look more reasonable, because there is always this prevailing idea that the government is automatically bad, and it is just the people being oppressed. We seen this kind of framing many times, when America is preparing to coup another country's government. It doesn't matter whether the government really is bad, or that the majority really hate it, or even if the government is illegitimately elected. It gives American actions a plausible deniability that they are helping the rebels to overthrow a oppressive government and they will keep hammering the propaganda that the government is bad (read: against American interests).
Third, it gives its own people the satisfaction that they are doing the right thing, that America stands for what is right and went to liberate a people that needed liberating badly. It prevents normal Americans from examining more closely whether the adversary government really deserve such a drastic intervention from the US government. They give indoctrinated Americans who are already brought up to distrust authority a convenient reason why the intervention must happen and to give themselves a pat on the back.
It worked many times, and now they are preparing the American people and the world to absorb the idea that intervention and containment of China is the "righteous" thing to do. It is sinister, it is evil and people like pompeo will lead America down the path of ruin. It is not that pompeo doesn't understand China. It is that he is preparing America to confront China for the sake of the American ruling class (ie the super rich and powerful) to not lose their hegemonic control over America and the world. Mark my words, like Lord Farquaad, they are very willing to sacrifice common American lives to preserve their hegemony.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I find it really hilarious that the F-16 is still touted as a weapon that a modern integrated air defense capable country will be afraid of. If you are bombing people with no SAMs and fighters, then sure F-16 will be an excellent weapon. Against a country with long range, over the horizon, radar stations, early warning, S-400s and Su fighters with big radars and BVR missiles, it will take a few hundreds F-16s to even make a dent and expect to lose a lot of them and the pilots in the battles ahead. A dozen F-16s will not make any difference at all, even if they are used strictly for launching standoff weapons against ground targets, and then fly the hell out.
Haha NATO is not even thinking of giving them F-15s. Or F-18s. Well, the US stopped F-18 production, both the original and super version, so they don't have spares anyway.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Cyrus, I think all those who watch your channel knows that the debate between totalitarianism/authoritarianism vs democracy/freedom in western media is a bogus exercise designed to distract most people in the west from the simple truth that there is already a deep authoritarianism in the west. Corporate control and authority in the west is near absolute. When we talk about how social media in the west is "free" in that people can spend as much time as possible on them is a superficial representation of liberty. You are free to eat as much salt as you like, but if are gulping down spoonfuls of it, no matter how tasty it is, you are killing yourself. But for the salt industry, they would love if everyone over consume salt in their diet.
Western social media is nefarious and malicious in their own ways because they are driven primarily by profits and most importantly control over the narratives that the plutocratic class wants people to believe in. That is why I find the term state media to describe Chinese media to be hypocritical, because in the west, barring a few media outlets, are all controlled by a few corporations. It is far more accurate to say that the media in the west are almost exclusively controlled by the Corpo-State system. They are a form of state media, the corpo-state media because at this point, the state and corporations are functionally the same entity.
This is what you could have said but I understand that you will probably get shut down even by shitheads like piers morgan the moment you try to correctly characterize western media as corpo-state media and social media in the west are far more controlling subtle, far more insidious that any forms of propaganda machines out there. The most hypocritical part of this interview is that everything that feckless MP said are done by the west on their own citizens and on others. You and al of us know just how much double standards the west practice everyday. Saying one thing, doing another. Admonishing others to do one thing, and they themselves go ahead and do that same thing themselves.
The US wanting to ban tiktok is no more the same reason that China banning western social media, they are afraid of losing control over their citizens' minds. But for the Chinese, they know just how destructive western social media is to the local population, they banned them because they know that the west will use their social media to sow chaos at the detriment of normal Chinese people, all the while characterizing these as agitation for freedom. The US government uses these tactics all the time for coups and chaos. For the US wanting to ban tiktok is because they are afraid of their people starting to get ideas that will go against the capitalist plutocratic class, considering just how terrible conditions are on the ground for most Americans today. The motivations from each country is completely different even if their methods are similar: China wants to protect its people, the US wants to protect its plutocratic hegemonic control over the west.
The only difference between Chinese authoritarianism and western authoritarianism is at least the Chinese have a lot of say in their government and what they want tends to come through eventually, but the common citizens of the west do not have any control over who becomes the CEOs, CFOs, COOs, CTOs, the board of directors of the companies and how they ultiamtely plutocratic class. They don't even really have control over who they elect into their government.
Western freedom is a sham based on superficial appearances and distracting Orwellian language.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@陈奕纯-u9c The US is not free to meddle because arming Taiwan IS causing the island to make unilaterally changes. They do it anyway because they never have to suffer real consequences for their actions. They never have to worry about their own land being invaded, their cities burnt and their people dead from committing all these international crimes, provoking wars, causing untold amount of misery and killing other people. Their relative safety made them arrogant to think they never have to consider other countries' concerns, and perspectives. They can do whatever they want and they can always spin it that they are the good guys. The last time their country was directly attacked as in 9/11 they doubled down on their aggressive, oppressive, underhanded and coercive foreign policies. They learnt nothing from their past mistakes, sublimely confidence in the inviolability of their mainland, even after 9/11.
The only way they learn is to finally have someone punch them in the face, really, really hard. It seems that they really think they can take on China like they did with the USSR and win. China doesn't want a confrontation and it doesn't want to dominate the world. It just want to not being humiliated and weak and poor anymore. It just want to be left alone to do its own thing and trade and integrate. But the US won't let China be, because China's rise is threatening the western neoliberal capitalist system and that is where the true power in the west lies.
The only hope we have is that the Chinese leadership understand very clearly what the US is trying to do and act with strategic discipline and patience and not be baited into some sort of confrontation. Yes, China will likely survive quite after such a confrontation but it will definitely still fucked up a lot of things. But if the US really thinks that it can win a war with China, it is going to be in for nasty surprise.
America needs to be taught a lesson. Hard.
2
-
This is beyond just giving face. It is basic mutual respect. If you say one thing and then do another, you are not merely not giving him, you are actively insulting the dignity and intelligence of that person. This is not a Chinese thing, this is not an Indian thing, this is not any particular culture thing, it is basic human decency to express that you are respectful of the other person by not insulting them at the drop of the hat. It's not freedom of speech to lie and cheat and manipulate your deeds and words. It is literally one of the most despicable thing to do IN EVERY CULTURE to say one thing in front of someone's face (blinken visiting China) and then to stab them behind their back (biden calling Xi a dictator).
How arrogant can you be to think that the other side have to accept your backstabbing, as though you are in the right. The worst part is that the Americans truly believe they have the right to do this kind of sh*t because it's freedom of speech for them to say whatever they want, especially when they know they are lying or they believe in a lie. Xi is not a dictator, he is answerable to the politburo, the CPC councils, the bureaucracy and ultimately the Chinese people. He can be removed from power. The west just says whomever they don't like is a dictator. The word has become so meaningless only westerners still use it unironically. biden literally lied that Xi is a dictator because it gives him campaign money and votes. That's beyond not giving face. It is immoral, it is depraved.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Matthew_Loutner They literally can't cut spending. They can't cut military spending because the MIC won't let them and their imperialist mindset won't allow a voluntary draw down of their overseas bases. They can't cut spending on welfare because most of the working poor class and old people depend on that welfare to survive (barely). They can cut away all the other discretionary spending like unemployment or some departments but those are just drops in the bucket and will likely also put immense hardship on the already tapped out population. And you are further proposing increasing taxes? From who? Certainly not from the rich holding all the capital and assets because they will never allow that to happen. The poor have no more to give since their wages are already not enough to cover their survival and the "middle class" is getting tapped out.
No, this is not something you can just adjust. It is a fundamental structural problem with the UAS government spending and the perverse incentives of capitalism that corrupted the democratic process and having it completely hijacked by the rich capitalist class. The UAS government spending is now 30% of the GDP of the UAS. If they pare it back by any significant percent, it will also be a significant drop in GDP and that will reverberate across the entire economy because so many people and companies depend on that spending.
They are truly F, and they have to deficit spend to maintain this zombie economy. But the problem is that they are getting their rug pulled from underneath them because the one of last two bastions of the UAS economy, the financial industry where they can still make "money" is getting chipped away by the de-dollarization efforts of the Global Majority and EU, Japan and SK are getting tapped out too. The other bastion, the military industry is also getting hammered because they depend almost completely on government spending and also from other countries, all of which are entering recession or already in a recession, one they might not recover from because all the "allies" themselves are tapped out and is getting blocked from exploiting their former colonies (see West Africa throwing out France and the UAS). They are also losing all their w__s.
The west is being de-industrialized (look at Germany) and even the subsidies from the UAS borrowing is not having enough effect to reverse it, the Chips Act is now largely a failure. There is no more renewable energy industry and the car makers are next on the chopping block. The west is no longer producing enough at a competitive cost (no more cheap energy) to earn enough money to pay their debts. They are not growing enough to earn more money and generate value.
Cut what? Tax who? Most of the spending is uncuttable without triggering a massive social unrest and the people that must be taxed will never allowed being taxed.
Also, your other comment where you said the US dollar value is rising is so wrongheaded that I don't even know how to correct you because it is factually wrong. The US dollar has lost value every single year since nixon abolished the gold standard.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Democracy should not only be about procedures like voting and the freedom of the press. Results should be the grading cards of democracy.
Does that country enact policies that the people want? Or do they enact policies that only the rich and powerful want?
Does changing the government change fundamental policies, especially those pertaining to the economy, regulations of big corporations, public investment, education, housing, food security, wages, financial regulations etc., policies that deeply affect people's everyday lives.
Do the policies enacted result in sustainable (economic and environmental) growth that sees the standard of living improve for the majority of the people and they have better financial security?
Do these policies decrease wealth inequality?
Do the foreign policies enacted reflect fair and obey international regulations and laws and reduce conflicts instead of icnreasing and escalating them?
Do these foreign policies actually improve the strategic position of the country and thereby improve the security of the people at home? Does these policies improve relationships with other countries and increase trade while maintaining a healthy trade balance?
Do the press actually have freedom to dissent, measured by how one sided the narratives presented by the media? Does the government have direct and indirect control over what the media print?
Does the government use clandestine means to spy on its citizens? Do they use these means to persecute people who do not adhere to prevailing narratives?
Does the social and cultural zeitgeist allow dissenting opinions and narratives to be voiced without the person being "canceled"?
I am sure that we start measuring democracy in these ways, the US and most of the west will fail most of the criteria to be a democracy even if the people can vote. The funny part is that China clearly wins on most of the criteria and failed in some.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@user-hz6fj9xy4y That's not the point and you know it. Russia is still a major economy whether you like it or not, and a major economy that can de-dollarize so fast points to the fact that ANY economy can de-dollarize if they are forced to. Some harder, some easier but it is not impossible.
The idea that it is not impossible to de-dollarize, or at least reduce your exposure severely so as to protect your country's economy from US aggression is now very much thinkable, and we are already seeing trends everywhere that non-western, and even some western countries are reducing their reliance on the USD system and subsequently looking for alternatives to do international trade and park their money safely.
The trend is what is important, and is routinely ignored by western media and westoids because if they look at the trend, they will despair. So, like you, they like looking at the things now because it look good on the surface and to cherry pick parts they like and ignore the rest of the more important, core parts.
It's the same way you point out that Germany's GDP is higher than Russia while ignoring the fact that Germany's economy has become more and more unsustainable as it lost access to cheap energy it needs to fuel its export oriented economy. Russia is now unsurprisingly the fastest growing European country (if Russia can even be called European now). How come you're not mentioning that fact?
This points more to desperation and head-in-the-sand mentality than to confidence and objectivity.
It's honestly getting pathetic.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Capitalism extracts more money and time than out of the workers, to the point that they are barely surviving, because it is a capitalist job to keep wages low and prices high. So, there is literally no excess income to raise children which are huge income sinks.
The example that you gave right at the beginning about housing already tells us that. House owners want kids when house prices increase while renters feel the opposite when rent increases. What this means is the house owner feels his capital has increased, while the renter feels his capital is being extracted away.
There is no mechanism in capitalist societies to correct for this, to put the money generated by the workers more in the hands of the workers to the point that they feel confident enough to have children. So the workers will never want to have children, and those that do find themselves trapped in a income to family expenditure death spiral.
It's really that simple. You want people to have children, you need to put more money in their hands in the form of better wage to profit ratio, and better price to wage ratio. They key is more capital in the hands of the people. This means a huge shift in the way the capital generated shift. We are not talking about billions, we are talking about trillions here. Which is why just giving a few billions here and there has no effect, it's a drop in the ocean.
But capital = power and there is no way capitalists will allow workers to have more capital.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I think there should be a new way to measure democracy: the relative distance between a de jure democracy and a de facto democracy. De jure is that on paper and procedural, a country can be democratic, but if it is not measure with de facto democracy.
De facto democracy will measure:
1. the policies that people desire gets enacted vs. policies they don't want or don't care for, will indicate power distribution among the population
2. wealth inequality that indicate how wealth is concentrated,
3. poverty level indicates how fair the overall system is able to redistribute wealth and give prosperity to all,
4. combined 2 and 3 will give us measurement of the utilitarian level of the policies that helps distribution of wealth
5. achieving basic living standards: including true access to education, housing, jobs, savings and retirement, healthcare etc.,
6. labor union power measured against corporate power, pervasiveness of unions and whether unions have enough power for negotations
7. imperialistic tendencies of the countries' foreign policies
8. media independence from powerful influences including government and corporations, to examine the level of propaganda that skewed toward powerful elites, both state and private.
9. measurement of the citizens' information bubble derived from covert and overt propaganda and indoctrination - true measurement of freedom of thought
If you start measuring democracy in the de facto manner, I will bet a lot of money that the US will drop in democracy ranking tremendously. The current way these metrics are measured is absurdly skewed toward de jure democracy that serves to put western countries on a higher moral pedestal that they do not deserve and these fake moral high grounds are weaponized for diplomatic imperialism from the west. Also, take note that non of the defactor democracy measurements are measuring concepts and system implementation. The results are what matters, and it doesn't really matter what system you used to achieve democratic results - ie. policies and results that benefit the most people possible and keep abuses from the wealthy and political elite low.
We will have classification like True Democracy (maybe some Scandinavian countries will qualified) where both the de jure and de facto measurements are high; Superficial Democracy (US, UK and probably most of western Europe, even India) where de jure is high but de facto is low; Practiced Democracy (China, Singapore and some other prosperous countries with stronger dejure authoritarianism) where the de jure is low but de facto is high, and Undemocratic (usually failed states) where de jure is low and de facto is low.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
It is rich that westerners are still talking about moralit when their entire economic foundation and standard of living was built on capital made by plundering the world for 500 years of colonialism and today with financial neocolonialism, and exporting their problems to everyone.
There is only 1 thief running around because you are not stealing when you are retrieving what was rightfully yours in the first. It will be like saying that Egypt is stealing from the British museum by retrieving the item within. The technological advancements made in the west is built on the high standard of living of the people living there, because there is enough excess resources for colleges to churn out STEM grads, and money to hire these grads and buy the equipment to do research. That excesses, that capital are generated on the foundation built from 500 years of colonialism and neocolonialism.
You can go to college and learn math and electronics engineering mostly because your ancestors plundered the Global South to build that standard of living, and even today your government export inflation, and uses the exorbitant privilege of the USD system to squeeze value out of the Global South. Without the loot from colonialism, and sustain from the modern financial system that still extracts value from the world, there wouldn't be an ASML, Intel, AMD, OpenAI, Microsoft, Apple or whatever in the west.
Let me end this meaningless question of morality by framing this situation in the correct way: it's time for the west to pay reparations.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Sammasambuddha 7 nm is not decades behind. It's 1 to 1.5 gen behind and the front end is not going to get any better. We are reaching the physical limits of Moore's law. Meanwhile, India doesn't even have a comparable semiconductor industry. The one that is decades behind the west and China, and will be a century behind if they don't buck up is India.
Once China has its own EUV, they can do whatever they want and the west and India are not gonna be able to stop them. It will likely come within 5 years, 3 if we are lucky.
Ohh, you think EUV and silicon based electronics are the end game? China's R&D and industry are also developing next evolution in electronics like photonics and quantum computing and in these areas they are not far behind the west and even surpassed them in some areas.
Betting against China is almost always a bad bet.
So instead of impotently trying to put down China, why don't the Indians for once, take a humble pill and learn from the Chinese, their system, their culture, their governance on why they have succeeded in pulling 800 million Chinese of out poverty, eliminated extreme poverty and build the most dynamic economy in the world while most India languishes in poverty. And the Chinese did it without colonizing other countries like what the British did to India.
India can't even design and build its own engines and radar for its latest destroyer. So if the US don't like India, or it has to do is tell its vassals to stop selling to India and the Indian Navy will be crippled overnight. But hey INDIA SUP[ERPOWAH SUPERERER!!!!!!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
First, we need to disabuse the notion that the US is a free country, even if it is relative. It is a plutocracy, an oligarchy. It is as free as the oligarchs in the US allow it to be free. It has the superficial appearance of dmeocracy where every part of the process is neutered to the point that most Americans know voting does jack shit. It has so little freedom that most Americans are one surprise 500 USD expenditure from financial ruin. They are living paycheck to paycheck, they are under constant pressure and threat from being fired, they have no real access to healthcare, their education is getting more expensive, they are one financial crisis from losing their homes. They have no freedom because they are not free from the tyranny of their plutocrats.
Free speech, having guns, and 20 choices of shampoos are all nice and that, but if you are on the verge of ruin, and is financially coerced constantly to work increasingly shittier jobs while unable to save, invest for retirement and is one illness away from complete disaster, YOU ARE NOT FREE. The fact that you yourself pointed out how a "free" society can be propagandized so efficiently in this stupid "Good vs Evil" dichotomy already showed that free speech does not work in America. Not when their corpo-state media can basically brainwash Americans in any way they want. Freedom of speech is basically weaponized against the American people. They have no real freedom of thought.
So please stop saying that America is free. It is not free.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@nickl5658 No it doesn't. It has been maintiang trade deficit with nearly every country and it is not producing enough trade revenue. The military is supported by debt and borrowing. To do what China does, you will need to sustain a 100 billion dollar investment around the world for 10 years, at low interest rates that will not be repaid for 30, 40, maybe even 100 years.
America does not have the production to create this kind of wealth. All it does is recycling other countries' surpluses and financialized it. The real goods and services - those that have real values - America does not produce enough of those. And year after year, China is producing more and more of the real goods and services that America produced at cheaper prices.
Lastly, Americans, Europeans and Indians are mostly governed by neoliberal capitalist policies. That means they will always be short-sighted and they will never hold, and they will always negotiate in bad faith - they are always looking out to make a quick buck and screw over the other side.
This kind of dynamic is the direct opposite of how China conducts BRI, which is long term, very patient investment, that is in line with their strategic goals of a sustainable development of their BRI partners. They are willing to wait for decades for their partners to pay them back, and get strong so their markets will be open to the Chinese and they build friendly relationships with them.
The moment sh*t hits the fan in the Us or Europe and India, watch them start eating each other alive. This is not a sustainable relationship because neoliberal capitalists do not make friends. They do not have partners. They only have themselves and those to be exploited.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Ohh Pepe, China already far exceeded whatever Russia is fielding or coming up with. They probably collaborate but to say they are receiving technology from Russia is just hilarious. They literally have faster, longer range, smarter hypersonc missiles than Russia. They have AI powered satellites that have tracked US carriers from their ports to their exercise grounds and they field some of the most advanced fighters like the J-20, and soon J-35 in the world. Heck, the best Sukhoi is not in Russia, it is PLAAF's J-16 that can fire PL-15, PL-17 (which has a range of 400 km) and a huge AESA radar, high level of composites and now they even have better jet engines, while being supported by very advance early warning planes, ground based and ship based radars in a highly networked system. Their drones are far more advance and numerous and the new Type 076 LHD is most likely going to be equipped with EMALS that can launch drones, making it really the first drone carrier, along with manned helicopters. This is not even considering that China is nearly self-sufficient in every level of technology and production.
I know you like the Russians but nearly every aspect of China is way way way above Russia now. I don't think we should be even dismissing the PLA capability in waging war like the way the westoids do, since they have come from one of the greatest military traditions of the 20th century, the CPC fighting the KMT and winning, the Long March, the tactical and strategic genius of CPC commanders, including Mao who literally wrote a textbook on guerilla/asymmetrical warfare.
Underestimating China is always a bad idea.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The problem with the west is that they have drank their own kool-aid. They have demonized Russia, China, Iran and other countries like Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea to the point that they have created for themselves these images that these countries are the ultimate evil, antithetical to "freedom(tm)" and "democracy(c)". Their elites and their media have created this mess where now they cannot stop and have to keep pushing forward with confrontation. This is now a good vs evil battle and the west, especially the US cannot extricate themselves out of it.
They cannot imagine that these countries are not evil, that they have every right to defend themselves, and they have every right to have their culture, government, society not interfered or dominated by the west. Because they believe only the western model, the western narratives are the only correct ones, they cannot brake, stop and rethink. They have absolutely no self awareness of the horrible things they themselves are doing, since everything is about fighting the axis of evil, the ends will justify the means. Worse, their media can spin black into white, wrong into right so they never have to grapple with the idea that THEY ARE THE BADDIES.
That's why we keep hearing these contradictory statements, positions and stances the US take against Russia, China and the rest, They don't think this is hypocrisy or double standards, they think that if you are fighting evil, you can use any methods, and tactics to do so.
The rich plutocrats and oligarchs in the west of course know better. They are fighting this because they are afraid of losing the western hegemony that allows them to do whatever they want with impunity. They are afraid that they might have the face the consequences of their crimes so they will drive the west into oblivion to protect themselves.
2
-
The problem with the west is that they have drank their own kool-aid. They have demonized Russia, China, Iran and other countries like Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea to the point that they have created for themselves these images that these countries are the ultimate evil, antithetical to "freedom(tm)" and "democracy(c)". Their elites and their media have created this mess where now they cannot stop and have to keep pushing forward with confrontation. This is now a good vs evil battle and the west, especially the US cannot extricate themselves out of it.
They cannot imagine that these countries are not evil, that they have every right to defend themselves, and they have every right to have their culture, government, society not interfered or dominated by the west. Because they believe only the western model, the western narratives are the only correct ones, they cannot brake, stop and rethink. They have absolutely no self awareness of the horrible things they themselves are doing, since everything is about fighting the axis of evil, the ends will justify the means. Worse, their media can spin black into white, wrong into right so they never have to grapple with the idea that THEY ARE THE BADDIES.
That's why we keep hearing these contradictory statements, positions and stances the US take against Russia, China and the rest, They don't think this is hypocrisy or double standards, they think that if you are fighting evil, you can use any methods, and tactics to do so.
The rich plutocrats and oligarchs in the west of course know better. They are fighting this because they are afraid of losing the western hegemony that allows them to do whatever they want with impunity. They are afraid that they might have the face the consequences of their crimes so they will drive the west into oblivion to protect themselves.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The west will never be fair to China now because they have deem China a strategic threat. If China puts a target below 5, it means they are collapsing, if they put it at 5, it means they are unrealistic. This tactic is known as hostile evidence presentation:
“During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard.
By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative.
If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime's atheistic ideology.
If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn't go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom.
A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them.
If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.” - Michael Parenti, Blackshirts and Reds
China can cure cancer tomorrow, repel an alien invasion the day after and discover the way to limitless free energy and the western media will say "aT wHat COsT?"
What China wants is high quality growth that is sustainable by itself, not a play on numbers by injecting huge amount of money printed out of thin air to temporary shoot the numbers up. China wants to grow good quality muscles that take time and hard work, not give itself steroids shots. That's why the west's pp is getting smaller, they keep giving themselves steroids and growing huge fugly muscles that is disgusting to look at and they will lose when play arm wrestling with a real strongman.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@HiranyaGarbh. The US supported China because they want to exploit China's cheap labor and think that their neoliberal capitalism will create a new generation of corrupted politicians and oligarchs that will favor the US world order. Well, they are wrong and the socialist order still holds strong in China. So now they are regretting it because China is dismantling the neoliberal world order dystopia and they are scared the hell out of their mind.
China kept her head down and bide their time. They have a plan to industrialize rapidly and get as much tech into their industries. They are focused, experimental, rational, objective, and driven. They played their role well and let the west exploit their cheap labor, that's true. But they always require tech transfer and they are never complacent. They keep learning and keep trying to build their own capabilities.
That's why the Type 055 destroyer is built with nearly all components made in China, while most of the Visakhapatnam-class destroyer's components are imported, especially crucial parts like engines, radars and even weapons.
China is using that fiat USD in BRI investment, turning the useless paper into something real and valuable. Partly it's because they don't want to keep holding USD which they can be sanctioned, partly they have these huge amount of surpluses they don't want to park in Wall St. to enrich American financial oligarchs which in turn funds the US military that is hostile to China.
While they are able to build the Global South up, make them strong enough to resist the west, provide the world with an alternative way for financing that is not the IMF or World Bank. And also to create good will among all these previously colonized and still oppressed countries that they might one day rally against the west.
China not only plays the long game, they play the smart game by using every possible angle to help them reduce their weaknesses and gain strength. Using their surpluses denominated in USD to build up the Global South is a win-win-win-win game. Trillions of USD are used which otherwise would have been parked in Wall St to enrich American rich ratfuckers. That is the kind of 5D chess that Indian politicians will never be able to play, because they are just not at that level. Indian politicians are like children compared to Chinese politicians.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The west defined the good, the bad, they define the criteria to measure the good and the bad, and they elevate their system as the good, and every other system as bad.
How convenient.
Even if we define what is good and bad by reasons and logic, the west seldom live up to any of these standards. They simply redefined the terms and standards whenever it is convenient. That's why there is so much hypocrisy and double standards. The worst part is that their propaganda machine is so pervasive that they have effectively brainwashed their own people to believe in their own moral and cultural superiority that if their media says that is wrong and bad, it must be wrong and bad. When challenged, they will use all kinds of apologetics techniques, like false accusations, misleading narratives and cherry picking, throwing terms like "whataboutism" when their hypocrisy is laid bare when they challenge another country's policies and they never ever admit they are wrong.
Honestly, the way western media and westerners in general treat other countries, especially those that are rising to challenge their hegemony is not really that different that the right-wing fascist techniques we see being used in America and Europe on their own people.
I suggest everyone to go and watch Innuedo Studios' Alr Right Playbook series to have a good understanding of these nefarious techniques and call it out whenever you see western media doing it.
2
-
@pl Of course. Except that strength can come in many forms. The Ansar Allah is strong not because it has huge military power. They are strong because they figure a way to blockade the Red Sea SELECTIVELY (block western and Israel ships while letting other nations not supporting the gen*cide to pass through).
They are strong because they are smart enough to leverage their geography and their political will as the legitimate national government of Yemen to fight against a pariah of the world, and thus winning approval from 80% of the world.
But the US is not as strong as we are led to believe. Even as they bomb Yemen, the Ansar Allah remains unbent and unbowed and continue to blockade the Red Sea. The FM might be saying we should uphold international order by fighting against the blockade but it is obvious that it is not working for the gen*ciders and their accomplices. It is duplicitous for the FM not to mention that the Ansar Allah has no quarrel with China, Russia and non-western countries. So if Singapore does not support the gen*cide, then the Red Sea is completely safe for Singapore ships. Why should Singapore go solve a problem that the west created for themselves.
And yes, China can prosper precisely because it is strong enough to resist American interference and machination. The US will love nothing more than to plunge East Asia/West Pac into chaos by destabilizing China, without any regards to OUR INTERESTS AND SAFETY in this region. If sacrificing a 100 million Chinese lives and 10 million SE Asian lives will ensure American hegemony for the next 50 years while not sacrificing any American lives, the Americans will do it without any hesitation. They did the same in west Asia, they did it in LATAM and they did it in SE Asia back in the 60s and 70s too. The US government is not our friend. They view us all as pawns that can be sacrificed, as soldiers for a mafia that can be thrown into a gang fight.
Depending on the US, or China to defend ourselves is a mistake, that I can agree with the FM. Singapore and SE Asia must be strong enough to resist American nefarious machinations politically, economically, socially, culturally and militarily and to maintain a friendly if not a neutral, mutually beneficial relationship with China.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The problem with the west is that they have drank their own kool-aid. They have demonized Russia, China, Iran and other countries like Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea to the point that they have created for themselves these images that these countries are the ultimate evil, antithetical to "freedom(tm)" and "democracy(c)". Their elites and their media have created this mess where now they cannot stop and have to keep pushing forward with confrontation. This is now a good vs evil battle and the west, especially the US cannot extricate themselves out of it.
They cannot imagine that these countries are not evil, that they have every right to defend themselves, and they have every right to have their culture, government, society not interfered or dominated by the west. Because they believe only the western model, the western narratives are the only correct ones, they cannot brake, stop and rethink. They have absolutely no self awareness of the horrible things they themselves are doing, since everything is about fighting the axis of evil, the ends will justify the means. Worse, their media can spin black into white, wrong into right so they never have to grapple with the idea that THEY ARE THE BADDIES.
That's why we keep hearing these contradictory statements, positions and stances the US take against Russia, China and the rest, They don't think this is hypocrisy or double standards, they think that if you are fighting evil, you can use any methods, and tactics to do so.
The rich plutocrats and oligarchs in the west of course know better. They are fighting this because they are afraid of losing the western hegemony that allows them to do whatever they want with impunity. They are afraid that they might have the face the consequences of their crimes so they will drive the west into oblivion to protect themselves.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Even then, it is a superficial measurement. I think there should be a new way to measure democracy: the relative distance between a de jure democracy and a de facto democracy. De jure is that on paper and procedural, a country can be democratic, but if it is not measure with de facto democracy.
De facto democracy will measure:
1. the policies that people desire gets enacted vs. policies they don't want or don't care for, will indicate power distribution among the population
2. wealth inequality that indicate how wealth is concentrated,
3. poverty level indicates how fair the overall system is able to redistribute wealth and give prosperity to all,
4. combined 2 and 3 will give us utilitarian level of the policies that helps distribution of wealth
5. achieving basic living standards: including true access to education, housing, jobs, savings and retirement, healthcare etc.,
6. labor union power measured against corporate power, pervasiveness of unions and whether unions have enough power for negotations
7. imperialistic tendencies of the countries' foreign policies
8. media independence from powerful influences including government and corporations, to examine the level of propaganda that skewed toward powerful elites, both state and private.
9. measurement of the citizens' information bubble derived from covert and overt propaganda and indoctrination.
If you start measuring democracy in the de facto manner, I will bet a lot of money that the US will drop in democracy ranking tremendously. The current way these metrics are measured is absurdly skewed toward de jure democracy that serves to put western countries on a higher moral pedestal that they do not deserve and these fake moral high grounds are weaponized for diplomatic imperialism from the west.
We will have classification like True Democracy (maybe some Scandinavian countries will qualified) where both the de jure and de facto measurements are high; Superficial Democracy (US, UK and probably most of western Europe, even India) where de jure is high but de facto is low; Practiced Democracy (China, Singapore and some other prosperous countries with stronger dejure authoritarianism) where the de jure is low but de facto is high, and Undemocratic (usually failed states) where de jure is low and de facto is low.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@skysky1977 Yes, actually they do. This is not about rights. This is about balance of power and intentions. The fact that they didn't is because they did not want to cause WWIII even though the THAAD is clearly aimed at neutralizing PLARF, thereby set up the conditions where the west can invade China if they want to. Whether THAAD is actually effective is another story. See, you keep trying to spin this as a defense against China but you always ignore the fact that the US can in turn invade China from SK, and that is a real threat to China.
To bring home the point, the Cuban Missile Crisis was the other way around but the cause was still that the US threatened Moscow by putting nuclear missiles in Turkey, which the Soviets responded by putting nuclear missiles in Cuba. Obviously the missiles in Turkey was a national security concern, yet when they put missiles tit for tat in Cuba, the Americans reacted with force.
So obviously putting assets near a country that can either threaten or neutralize said country's defenses is a glaring provocative move and often is a precursor to invasion. China did not put DongFeng missiles in Mexico or Cuba, so why should the Americans be allowed to be THAAD in SK and sail aircraft carriers up and down the coastlines of China? Because the west is the good guys and all its rivals are the bad guys? Really, are we really gonna go with that logic in spite of the tremendous amount of misery the west had cause and still causing? Remember Iraq 2003? Remember Yugoslavia? Or the other numerous times the US and the west interferes with other countries, invade them based on flimsy pretexts. Not to mention the unilaterally or bloc sanctions that are illegal. So who are really the ones NOT respecting international laws and other countries' sovereignty?
Furthermore, If the US can give themselves the right to "pre-emptively" strike at anyone they deem a national security threat, why is this standard not applicable to everyone else too? Because the US is the good guy? Really?
This is what we called in civilized countries, double standards and hypocrisy. Ultimately, the problem with the west is their arrogance in their supremacy that they never think they should treat other country's interests and concerns as equal as their own, and that they can just spin that everyone who refuse to participate (ie. bend the knee) to their system do not deserve any considerations, and thus they can be invaded, interfered and the facts and narratives that work against the west or for their rivals are fair game to be distorted, misrepresented and often just lied about. Because the westerners still think in the colonial mind and that they are always right, they are better and everyone else is fodder.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@merrick6484 Safeguarding their merchant vessels. As is their right to do so. The more the US exercise this kind of hard power bullying, the more countries are going to resent them for it. Yes, the US is still the top dog militarily and it can do this bullying and no one can do much about it, not even China. But Roman in its heyday was also invincible, and they plundered, pillaged and conquered their way across the Mediterranean and the Near East and no one could stop them. Until someone finally did when the Visigoths sacked Rome. They remembered what the Romans did to their ancestors, so did everyone surrounding the empire.
The irony of it all is that every passing day, the more relevant Leia's words to Tarkin becomes: "The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin, the more star systems will slip through your fingers," As the US of A more and more resembles the Galactic Empire. BRICS, BRI, SCO, RCEP, de-dollarization are all symptoms of this trend, and the American politicians are like the Emperor, Vader and their ilk, delusional about their reality.
The more America does this kind of bullying, the more the karma is going to pile up.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
China's debt are also almost all owed within the country. Hakim is right, China does not have a huge bond debt market. China also has accumulated the highest trade surplus in human history. They are literally awashed with cash. Most of their debts are also in industries that produce real commodities, and much needed services. Personal debts are actually very low and savings are high, and their housing market are mostly houses bought with cash by people or with very high down payments, so mortgage debts are low. China's problem is actually the reluctance of the Chinese people to spend because they are culturally a frugal society that has a phobia of debts and spending too much money too quickly, seeing their history is full of hard times of wars, famines, and disasters. The Chinese people have a lot of capital on their hands. They are doing fine.
The Chinese government has the absolute power to nationalize and take over any cancerous company and initiate a controlled implosion to limit the spread of any contagion. It also has the power to de-leverage any industry, restrict any industry to prevent harm from coming to the common people, which they have did numerous times to great effect that has brought relief to the Chinese people. The actions that the Chinese government had taken to protect the Chinese people is transparent for all to see and is one of the driving force for such high approval rating from the Chinese people. The Chinese people know their government stand on their side and they have numerous proofs for that.
China is not only growing at 4-5%, they are actually having a deflation now. Which means their real growth is actually even higher and most of it is organic, in important industrial sectors like high tech chip manufacturing. The deflation is deliberate as the Chinese government is trying to implode the real estate market and diversify the country's GDP portfolio. They don't want their real estate to grow uncontrollably, full of over-leveraged developers. That will be a disaster down the market. They are popping the bubble on their own terms so they can build a more sustainable, diversified economy for the future. This is an insane concept for western economists and capitalists.
China ain't collapsing. Not by a long shot.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Yes, China has been playing catch up for a long time and most of their efforts have been focused on the transnational, optimization and scaling and less on generating new technologies and discoveries from ground up. But that has already changed for years. Now more and more Chinese scientists are publishing highly original and innovative papers that explore ideas and concepts that have never been considered or asking new questions that emerged from current scientific understanding.
Yes China will continue to take ideas suggested by others and make it into a real thing but Philip Wong is a little off the target by implying that is the only thing China does. Photonic chips, steady state microbunching accelerator light source for UV sources, quantum computing, even building and testing their own nuclear fusion and pushing towards Gen 4 nuclear fission reactors are just some of the examples of China innovating their way out. Not to mention their own burgeoning AI research field, and cutting edge battery tech, electronics which are real products that have come from Chinese scientists' own ideas.
Heck, the Chang'e program just proves that China is very willing to invest a lot to do research that is highly inquiring in nature, just for the sake of knowing something. Sure the mission has a lot of other benefits and objectives such as planning for a moon base but it is still in short term a scientifically indulgent type of project, something that used to be an exclusive domain of the west, and the Soviet Union.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The congress cannot stop spending because if it stop spending, the entire shitfest collapses on itself. No politician in America will do that because they will not survive reelection. No one in the US government can tell the American people that they will have to destroy their current economic system to rebuild it, retool it and re-industrialize. The American people are already suffering from the worst wealth inequality since the Great Depression. Their social fabric is breaking down. Their culture are built on narcissism and delusions. They do not how to build a proper, sustainable, communal society anymore.
There is also no way the plutocrats, the oligarchs in America will allow the US government to tax them or even nationalize their companies for the sake of the country. The US is now trapped in a finger trap. They cannot stop spending because the country will die, they cannot ask the American people to suffer even more because they are on the brink of collapse as their household debts are unsustainable, and the political system is completely enthralled by their oligarchs who will never budge on taxes and demand unsustainable growth on their assets.
The US is a zombie, a dead man walking and they are too propagandized to understand or care. Heck, the BRICS summit admitting new members which are strategically selected to destroy the petrodollar should be the biggest news right now but everyone in America is celebrating the mugshot of trump and I'm not defending trump; he deserves to be in prison. They are trading temporary relief for even worse pain down the road when they will have no choice but to tank it. It is the most American thing to do: short term relief or gain and kicking the can down the road because their political system and culture simply cannot plan for the long term. We are watching history in the making of how a modern, neocolonial empire fall.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
If the west directly intervene, then they have sprung their own trap. The whole point of provoking the Ukrainian, and the attempt to do the same with Taiwan, is to force their enemies, Russia and China to become embroiled in an unwinnable war. Barring that, to keep encroaching on their territories. Either way, the west benefits from deliberately stepping on other countries' redlines.
If they really go to war directly in Ukraine, they will lose their own narrative and increase their own risks of being the ones getting bogged down in an unwinnable war.
I have a morbid hope that they will do it, and do it half-assedly because they are all reluctant to do it in the first place. With a lackluster commitment, or even a full commitment, the risks of their own war materials getting destroyed increased tremendously.
The west needs to be humiliated and humbled before they will back down. And this might be the opportunity for China and Russia to do it.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Kevin is still not learning the lesson of Afghanistan, it is you shouldn't be there at all in the first place. You want to take out Osama Bin Laden for 911, that should have been done through intelligence and covert operations. In the end, that's what happened. You want to prevent increasing number of refugees and seemingly increasing number of enemies, then you shouldn't be unilaterally sanctioning countries and people and use military force so causally to force other people to bend their knee.
The problem in the end, is that Americans drank the kool-aid that their culture and society and system are superior than everyone else and they cultivate a false sense of righteousness and so it gives them all the freedom to interfere with the rest of the world. The worst part is that most of these interventions, covert, overt, military or otherwise were not even done for the right reasons. Americans keep saying they are trying to promote freedom and democracy around the world but we all know that what they want is to impose their liberal capitalist system on all of us with them at the top of the hierarchy, raking in profits. America has an American exceptionalism, American supremacy problem that blinds them.
It is this hypocrisy of using noble values to hide sinister, greedy agendas and then using violence to enforce them, that truly disgust people.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
All of these maneuverings by Russia and China are to protect their economy while they weather the onslaught from the US. The US can raise interests rates to suck up everyone's capital, sure, but it will cost them a lot in the future when these bonds mature. They are basically cutting their own flesh and use it to slap China and Russia.They lose the flesh and is going to bleed for a long time. All China and Russia have to do is to carefully navigate the dollar system and slowly de-dollarize and wait for the eventual default of the US government. When that happens, the world will be thrown into chaos, especially for countries that depend heavily on the US financial system and economic order. Their treasuries and USD reserve will become worthless, and that's when China will strike the killing blow to US hegemony.
So we will be seeing who will crash first, the US with its high interest rates and weaponized currency or China/Russia and the BRICS nations along with the Global South trying to de-risk from the US financial and economic system. I will not be surprise if the US tries something desperate like forcing Taiwan to declare independence in a bid to force China to intervene and hope that a cross strait war will destroy China's economy first before they default. But I think the Chinese leadership knows better.
Or the US government severely cut down its spending and crash its own economy anyway. If they cut welfare severely at the point when ordinary Americans are living paycheck to paycheck, no savings, high debts incurred just to survive, it will break the proverbial camel's back. The political, banking, financial and economic system within the US will inevitably conspire against ordinary Americans to save their own skins, which is exactly what capitalists always do. It will make 2008 looked like a stroll in the park. We could even have a socialist revolution in the US. Or the US becomes a white supremacy fascist state, and de-dollarization will be the furthest thing from our mind when fascist America is threatening to launch nukes at anyone refusing to bend the knee.
Here is an important point to consider, the dollar does not have to lose all its market share as reserve currency for the US government to default. It just have to be low in demand to the point the treasuries' yield have to be high enough to make the US government unable to service the debt anymore.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@gracesutton1359 No problem. But therein lies the core problem; the average American knows very very little about any other point of views, other models, other systems, other ways of thinking outside the American model and are indoctrinated (yes indoctrinated) to not accept outside ideas. The American model is so pervasive that other models simply do not have a chance to make a stand in the "marketplace of ideas" which is heavily curated by pro-American model propaganda.
By framing it as American Exceptionalism, it makes learning and adopting outside ideas nearly impossible, and America has clearly lost out on advancements and progress in policy making, politics, systems of economy, philosophical examinations of society and culture, even science and technologies, where places like China and even in Europe are far more open to outside ideas. They have taken the best ideas and adapted them to their society and culture and it is clearly working for them.
One prominent example is passenger rail. Europe and Japan have proven that high speed rail works and China sought a solution to their huge population and cities adopted this idea. They know it works, they use it, learn about it and now has the largest HSR network in the world, moving millions of people per month that could have jammed up highways if they were all driving. That was also how the French learned from Japan's Shinkansen and created the TGV for themselves
Meanwhile, Americans are making all sorts of dumbass excuses about why HSR won't work in America, and deliberately build cities that have suburb sprawl, killing public transport and then wonder why cities are getting jammed up with traffic with 10 lanes highways and are going bankrupt trying to subsidize these suburbs. It is this American Exceptionalism that is preventing from learning from others and screwing up, not to mentioned the sheer arrogance and entitlement.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@MetaView7 Of course they care about national security. The century of humiliation is still a large driving force in Chinese mindset and that's when their national security was so weak they were invaded, bullied and oppressed by the west and Japan. China simply do not believe that national security should be based on fear, oppression on other countries and military might. The BRI, SCO, BRICS and various international organizations they are part of, are all tied back to their national strategic goal of multipolarity and reducing the US hegemony. US hegemony is the most direct threat to China.
They know that they should not challenge US hegemony directly through military force but rather to erode it over time through economic development, industrialization, self-sufficiency and most importantly giving the world an alternative to US controlled international organizations like the IMF, world bank, NATO etc., and the USD dominace, so the smaller, weaker countries that do not want to be controlled by Washington has a chance to slip pass that control and develop themselves. A stronger Global South means the collective west cannot dominate them and thus reduce US hegemony.
It took them a decade since the BRI was founded and various other organizations to become more mature. This is the kind of long term planning and strategic discipline to keep at it that the west simply cannot match. They do all these because they don't want to be bullied anymore. They don't want to be murdered by neoliberal fascists that control the west. National security is very much on the minds of CPC planners, as it should be. But sanctions like this is just tit for tad and don't really amount to much. The CPC are strategists, they think long term, they planned things carefully, and they adapt quickly to emerging situations. Sanctions used like how the west does it, is tactical, ineffective and ultimately self-destructive so China doesn't use it often, and even when they do, they used it mostly to make a point.
Only westerners think this is a big deal.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
China's economy already surpassed the US long ago. The moment the US chose to go down the neoliberal path of rampant financialization and de-industrialization, it is already in decline. The US can't make anything anymore on a large scale. China's industrial capacity far outstrip the US and the combined west. The US economy is literally propped up by its corrupted financial services and military industrial complex, overpriced healthcare, bullshit white collar jobs, and declining blue collar work. Oh, and environment destroying agriculture. Sure the US can re-industrialize but how fast, how much, and how efficient can the US do it? In the US, if it is not profitable, it simply won't be done and goods produced in the US is not cost effective enough to be profitable. That's the fatal flaw of capitalism.
China already won at the fundamental level. Now it is just a numbers game of GDP, HDI , life expectancy, education etc.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Why don't the US government just go ahead and ban all Chinese EVs anyway. The 100% tariff is already a farce which is obviously done to prevent Chinese EV makers from entering US market.
At the end of the day, the only thing the US leadership, their oligarchs, their corporations understand is complete crushing defeat, with a DF-21 warhead slamming into the deck of a USN carrier. All of these actions and aggression towards China is because the US is running out of time to preserve its hegemony, its financial colonial empire, and a desperate empire lead by infantile people will do great mischief before it can be subdued. The US must be forced to bend the knee and answer for all its transgressions, double standards and hypocrisy.
America must be made to pay, or else these infantile people will never learn their lesson. They must be made to suffer the consequences of their actions, and if that will finally result in a revolution in the country, then so be it.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
A lot of people in this comment thread is taking a regressive take on social justice causes and the humanities. There is nothing in socialism that says the humanities and sociology are parasitic. If you people even bother to actually learn about dialetics, materialism, and what Marx and numerous Marxist/socialist scholars have expounded over the last 2 centuries, you will understand that humanities and sociology (yes that includes gender studies, racial studies, class studies, historical materialism, etc., etc.) are needed for a healthy society to grow.
Dialectic materialism, and the Marxist-Leninist system that China is BASED ON, does not rejection the arts, humanities, sociology or the human side of society. It is in fact, the fulfillment of it because socialism is all about fulfilling the utmost of human potential, to ensure the value of the people's labor belongs to them and the ultimate expression of social justice. All of these "woke" studies are naturally part of the socialist ideology.
The difference between the western idea of "wokeness" and the socialist idea of true egalitarianism is that the western elites like to pretend that they care about these issues, while hijacking these ideas for their own agendas, weaponizing it, commodifying it, and stripping these ideas of its radicalism for social justice, until it is a product for performing virtue signalling.
That does not mean these ideas are not worthy of pursuit, just because western capitalist system strip them completely of its true substance, which is ultimately about social justice and equality for all, prosperity for all. In fact, it is at this point of time, we need to RECLAIM these ideas from the bourgeoisie and give them back their true purposes.
I am so sick and tired of people in the comment thread treating these ideas, while tainted by western bourgeois corruption as though they are the same as western bourgeois corruption itself.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
There should be a new way to measure democracy: the relative distance between a de jure democracy and a de facto democracy. De jure is that on paper and procedural, a country can be democratic, but if it is not measure with de facto democracy.
De facto democracy will measure:
1. the policies that people desire gets enacted vs. policies they don't want or don't care for, will indicate power distribution among the population
2. wealth inequality that indicate how wealth is concentrated,
3. poverty level indicates how fair the overall system is able to redistribute wealth and give prosperity to all,
4. combined 2 and 3 will give us utilitarian level of the policies that helps distribution of wealth
5. achieving basic living standards: including true access to education, housing, jobs, savings and retirement, healthcare etc.,
6. labor union power measured against corporate power, pervasiveness of unions and whether unions have enough power for negotations
7. imperialistic tendencies of the countries' foreign policies
8. media independence from powerful influences including government and corporations, to examine the level of propaganda that skewed toward powerful elites, both state and private.
9. measurement of the citizens' information bubble derived from covert and overt propaganda and indoctrination.
If you start measuring democracy in the de facto manner, I will bet a lot of money that the US will drop in democracy ranking tremendously. The current way these metrics are measured is absurdly skewed toward de jure democracy that serves to put western countries on a higher moral pedestal that they do not deserve and these fake moral high grounds are weaponized for diplomatic imperialism from the west.
We will have classification like True Democracy (maybe some Scandinavian countries will qualified) where both the de jure and de facto measurements are high; Superficial Democracy (US, UK and probably most of western Europe, even India) where de jure is high but de facto is low; Practiced Democracy (China, Singapore and some other prosperous countries with stronger dejure authoritarianism) where the de jure is low but de facto is high, and Undemocratic (usually failed states) where de jure is low and de facto is low.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I feel that there is no way this is not a coordinated action from the BRICS+ country. OPEC+ announces this right after the BRICS summit, after China has accumulated enough reserves, after the west is cooling off inflation using a lot of debts, after feds rate hikes and after the US strategic crude is at a very low volume? The BRICS countries are too smart to not exploit the economic weakness, the weakest link in the chain in the west that is the the Eurozone.
For years, the Europeans have been strung along by the US as vassal states. Their economy is wholly dependent on USD and US financial system. That means they have been sucked dry by the US like a vampire, every time the economy takes a hit. The Feds manipulate rates and everyone suffers for it. The Ukraine war has exposed a weakness in the NATO and the collective west, and the US as per usual only takes care of itself first, is now sucking Europe dry again to prop itself up. There is no way the people in power in Europe, even though they are neoliberal vampires themselves, not know what the US is doing to them. They are not happy but there is nothing they can do except to feed the life blood of their people as protection money to the US. On the surface, the collective seem unify to oppose China and Russia and still trying to subjugate the global south. But I bet behind closed doors, the Europeans are chaffing at being used like a cattle, led to the slaughterhouse to be harvested by the Americans.
I doubt the leadership in BRICS+ countries do not know this. They can easily make their own calculations and you can't run away from the numbers. America is draining Europe to prop itself up and Russia is accelerating that drain with the Ukraine war. There is also no way their own diplomatic and intelligence corps do not know the dissatisfaction from the Europeans about their situation that the Americans have put them into. What they need is a coordinated action to inflict as much economic pain at the right time, while shielding themselves from it. Make their economy scream, like what nixon arrogantly said back then. Now, the BRICS+ with the newly joined oil rich countries is going to make the west's economy scream. Who will break first? France? Germany? Italy? Spain? Poland? Who will be the first to call it quits and pick up the phone and call Xi and told him they are ready to play ball.
If the BRICS+ collective action really broke the camel's back, this will be biblical.
This might be a crazy time but oh boy we are witnessing history in the making. Liquidate as much as you can, keep the cash, get your popcorn and a big bottle of soda, and prepare for the ride. Because we might be finally seeing BRICS+ mete out heaven's justice on the behalf of the oppressed people of the world.
The west, and especially the US must be punished for their transgressions and hubris.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
It also mean even with the western atheletes doping , they can't win. And yes, they dope.
It's like everything they are doing to kneecap China. Even when they pull out all the dirtiest Tonya Harding tricks, they can't win. The western liberal capitalist system is exploitative and inhumane, their culture is cruel and selfish, their society is breaking down and they have no idea how to fix it or unwilling or unable to fix it, their economy is based on financial speculation, weapons industries and harvesting other countries' surpluses using the USD and it is being slowly torn apart.
They have no clue how to fix themselves and they only know how to use propaganda, manipulation, lies, and violence to stop their rivals. Except this time, they won't be able to stop China and the rise of the Global Majority. Singapore should take note who is going to command this century. Stand with the Global Majority and prosper, or stand with the west and fall.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@fawadali135 Nvidia now has a higher market cap than Apple and both companies do not even have factories. They just outsourced their manufacturing to China. For China, the stock market literally is not on their government's priority. They don't care about market cap. They care about real, concrete things like self-sufficiency, manufacturing capacity, technologies, food, raw materials etc.
It just goes to show how fake the American economy is. Designed in the US, made in China ignores that basic idea that the same kind of product can also be designed in China, made in China. But can the US do design in US, made in US? I doubt that, and that's what Kevin has been lamenting for the past few months on this channel.
Sure not every factory in China is equipped to produce high quality products, but then are there even factories in the US, and increasingly in the EU, Japan and SK that can produce at China's economies of scale and synergy of suppliers and vertical integration? We all know that answer.
The US economy is like Prof. Wen Tiejun said, it is a virtual economy based on IP generation and hoarding, financial boondoggles, end of life healthcare, and military spending and manufacturing. They don't produce anything really useful, at least not on a scale that matters.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The problem with the western sentiment is that they have brainwashed themselves into thinking that Putin is the devil and must not be "appeased". That the only acceptable outcome is Russia's total capitulation. That's why they are not interested in peace with Russia. They are interested in crushing Russia, and later crushing China.
These people are still completely steeped in the colonial mindset that only the west is by default right, and everyone else is wrong. They are by default racist because they cannot imagine non western or westernised countries as equal. They are not interested in true sovereignty for other countries because they think the only legitimate government system is the western liberal capitalist system. They are not interested in your opinions and rights until you bend the knee to the western order. If you deviate from any of these conditions, you are automatically the evil side, and since normal people don't negotiate with evil, the only way is to crush it.
Never mind that their entire premise is bogus, chauvinistic, and parochial, and very often just plain wrong. When you demonized everyone who is not like you, doesn't want to be like you as the devil, what you get is conflicts. Unending conflicts.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I think there should be a new way to measure democracy: the relative distance between a de jure democracy and a de facto democracy. De jure is that on paper and procedural, a country can be democratic, but if it is not measure with de facto democracy.
De facto democracy will measure:
1. the policies that people desire gets enacted vs. policies they don't want or don't care for, will indicate power distribution among the population
2. wealth inequality that indicate how wealth is concentrated,
3. poverty level indicates how fair the overall system is able to redistribute wealth and give prosperity to all,
4. combined 2 and 3 will give us measurement of the utilitarian level of the policies that helps distribution of wealth
5. achieving basic living standards: including true access to education, housing, jobs, savings and retirement, healthcare etc.,
6. labor union power measured against corporate power, pervasiveness of unions and whether unions have enough power for negotations
7. imperialistic tendencies of the countries' foreign policies
8. media independence from powerful influences including government and corporations, to examine the level of propaganda that skewed toward powerful elites, both state and private.
9. measurement of the citizens' information bubble derived from covert and overt propaganda and indoctrination - true measurement of freedom of thought
If you start measuring democracy in the de facto manner, I will bet a lot of money that the US will drop in democracy ranking tremendously. The current way these metrics are measured is absurdly skewed toward de jure democracy that serves to put western countries on a higher moral pedestal that they do not deserve and these fake moral high grounds are weaponized for diplomatic imperialism from the west. Also, take note that non of the defactor democracy measurements are measuring concepts and system implementation. The results are what matters, and it doesn't really matter what system you used to achieve democratic results - ie. policies and results that benefit the most people possible and keep abuses from the wealthy and political elite low.
We will have classification like True Democracy (maybe some Scandinavian countries will qualified) where both the de jure and de facto measurements are high; Superficial Democracy (US, UK and probably most of western Europe, even India) where de jure is high but de facto is low; Practiced Democracy (China, Singapore and some other prosperous countries with stronger dejure authoritarianism) where the de jure is low but de facto is high, and Undemocratic (usually failed states) where de jure is low and de facto is low.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@lrdhanshu7136 Thank you, I tried but practically speaking, it is impossible to break the media bubble.
When you live in a world where all the media tell you that black is actually white, it doesn't matter if your own eyes can see it for yourself, or the minority of people who tell you the truth. Add to confusion, are useless bullshit opinions that says black is just another shade of white, or black is not even a color, or white and black are really the same colors. Or that red is actually the real black and blue is the real white. Anything to never let Americans (and Europeans) able to focus on the real issues, the real problems. Confusion, divide, and conquer.
I used to lived in America, so I know how pervasive and nefarious their media really is. Americans are trapped in an Orwellian dystopia of constant information manipulation to the point they are either fanatics, completely confused or demoralized to the point of little resistance.
They have freedom of speech and freedom of press, which are basically hijacked by their wealthy elites to control their minds and make sure they will never rise. The real freedom they have, is freedom to be manipulated and exploited.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This comment might get removed by YT but here is a little truth. Europe is not sovereign. The UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the nordics, the baltic chihuahuas are not countries. You are all VASSALS of the United Snakes empire and your leaders are all colonial managers, collaborators. You really think you have the freedom to choose your leaders? LOL.
The problem for you is that as vassals, you have thrown your lot with the empire and now the empire is having problems of its own, they are abandoning you, and they are straight up going to harvest you like crops, and your leaders have no clue what to do because they never have an independent foreign policies that are not dictated from the Whitey Supremacy Hause. That's why you people are so confused, because you don't even recognized you are vassals, and you don't recognized just how much in disarray your colonial managers are right now.
This whole fiasco with Russia is because you followed Whitey Supremacy Hause's foreign policies by deliberately poking the bear, ignoring his requests, his demands, his pleas because all of you think that the bear is just a gas station with n**es, and not an actual country with their own security concerns, their own foreign policies, their own politics and economy, and their own people and culture. You people literally want to regime change them and balkanize them with the rubbing your hands together kind of glee. You have done everything but straight up declare w*r with the bear. And now the bear swipe his claws and smack you in the face, and all I hear is whining and whining and whining. None of you have the balls to seize your own sovereignty, make peace with the neighbor you have to live for the next thousand years, and seek better friends like the Rabbit.
I despise the empire for their horrible deeds, their lies and their manipulation but at least I respect the venom of the snake. I have no respect for the chihuahuas.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Because such reports and those from their "think tanks" are diplomatic weaponized tools. If you produce a report, spread it widely and keep talking about it, you can shape public opinions domestically and internationally. If you keep accusing other people of doing bad things, you can distract everyone from exmaining the bad things you did. It also gives you multiple reasons for Casus Belli (the reasons for belligerence) and therefore legitimize your aggression towards your rivals. Most importantly, it is for domestic consumption to convince your own people, and the people of the Imperial Core countries (North America, Europe, Japan, South Korea etc., ie. the Global North) that they are the good guys. That these wars caused by the Imperial Core are just, so their own people won't revolt due to war weariness.
If you define the criteria of judgement of a value system, you can always define away your wrongs and slander other people. It's advance propaganda.
That's why America made these reports.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The west will never be fair to China now because they have deem China a strategic threat. If China puts a target below 5, it means they are collapsing, if they put it at 5, it means they are unrealistic. This tactic is known as hostile evidence presentation:
“During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard.
By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative.
If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime's atheistic ideology.
If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn't go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom.
A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them.
If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.” - Michael Parenti, Blackshirts and Reds
China can cure cancer tomorrow, repel an alien invasion the day after and discover the way to limitless free energy and the western media will say "aT wHat COsT?"
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dormedinaDK Ohh goody, then by your logic, everyone should be allowed to me*dle in your internal affairs, co*p your government, b*mb your cities into the stone age, destabilize your regions, plunge your countries into decades of civil war, while everyone gets to exploit your people, una*ive them discriminating, deliberately keep you in unpayable debts denoted in other currencies, and forever poor and destitute.
Should we get started?
1
-
@dormedinaDK Ohh goody, then by your logic, everyone should be allowed to me*dle in your internal affairs, co*p your government, b**b your cities into the stone age, destabilize your regions, plunge your countries into decades of civil w*r, while everyone gets to exploit your people, una*ive them discriminating, deliberately keep you in unpayable debts denoted in other currencies, and forever poor and destitute.
Should we get started?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's not just trump. It's the fact that the GQP protected trump for two impeachments when it was clearly plain to everyone (everyone not brainwashed by right wing propaganda) that trump had strong armed another country's leader to make up fake dirt on Biden (1st impeachment) and that he incited a coup attempt (2nd impeachment). Like what Adam Schiff said, if right doesn't matter, we're lost. The republicans are lost because right doesn't matter to them anymore and if right doesn't matter, the rule of law doesn't matter, facts doesn't matter, truth doesn't matter and anyone who knows how to use their bigotry and fears will rise to their leadership positions and that's exactly what all of them are trying to do now.
This is the beginning of how an authoritarian fascist party can seize power. It's how Hilter rose to power. It's how a lot of dictators rose to power. There is a fundamental problem with our current political situation and it all points towards the GQP becoming more and more fascist every day. If you're China and you look at this, who will be the number one scapegoat in a fascist America? It will be "moi". Then you consider that we have the most powerful military in the world, along with thousands of nukes, a fascist America is an existential threat to China and pretty much the rest of the world, and we have never come closer to that since the interwar period. All you have to do is talk to trump supporters and the only conclusion for China is "yup, we might get nuked in 30 years."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
That is exactly what no one talks about. How about China's national security. We keep saying that China will invade Taiwan but no one ever thinks that Japan, Taiwan, and US can gank China together. We have invade many countries on pretexts and less important reasons. If the future develops into the point where Japan and America, Taiwan and even South Korea think they can fuck China, who are we to say that will not come to pass. For China, that is the worst nightmare scenario, and it is entirely possible. US is a waning, declining empire with weaker allies all around the world that we use as foreign policies foils. China is a rising power that directly challenged our hegemony. If anything is true, it is that Americans don't like being challenged. We like being the top dog and we will kill (and have killed) a lot of people to make sure everyone does not forget that. A Sino-American confrontation might not be inevitable but if it happen, I don't think we will necessarily be the good guys.
Remember, that trump will likely run in 2024 and has a good chance to win, and even if he doesn't, there are many GOP troglodytes like deSantis lying in wait. Who is to say a GOP fascist regime will not require invading another country to bolster domestic support when it screwed up. What guarantee does China have that an American dictator will not invade China or even nuke it?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Tiltrotors, like helicopters sound good on paper but is actually much worse right now. Tiltrotors are far more complex and more accident prone. That translate to even higher operational and upfront costs, to the point even wealthy passengers might balk at the price. They will never be big enough to really ferry enough passenger per trip to really benefit from the economies of scale like jetliner, metros, trains and buses. On top of that, no city will allow tiltrotors to operate just from rooftops of garages because they are insanely noisy. Helicopters are bad enough, tiltrotors are likely to be even worse. Having multiple tiltrotors landing and taking off regularly in the middle of the city - which is already noisy - will push local residents or workers insane.
A few things have to happen before helicopters or tiltrotors can become regular passenger liners. Costs have to go down, helicopter already achieve that for premium market, this is impossible right now for tiltrotors. Decrease complexity and increase reliability - this bring us directly into costs too as complexity increase maintenance and reliability decrease it. Costs have to go down to at least just 10 times the mass transit by per passenger per mile for the premium market and only about 2 - 3 times to have a chance to penetrate the masses. Most upper middle class people are willing to pay 2 - 3 times more to use a regular service to save time and headaches of driving and public transport and that's when you have a possible chance to make the business viable. Lastly, technology has to improve to the point where the noise level is comparable to a loud bus before such transport is even possible to operate in city centers. I don't see helicopters ever meeting these challenges, much less tiltrotors in the near future.
1
-
@burningknuckle26 That's the thing. I loved America or else I wouldn't have aspire to go to college there. I stayed and finish my undergrad then went on to get my PhD. I was even married to an American. But since the rise of the tea party in Obama's first term and the continued decline into collective hysteria and insanity, the facade has fallen off.
Now I see the ugliness underneath, the money worshiping, the brainwashing by capitalistic media, the double standards and hypocrisy and the casual violence.
The irony is that I met some of the kindest people in America, yet around them are people, friends and family even, that will callously dismiss the violence rampant in the society, the mass shootings, the school shootings, the gangland crimes just to never break the religious-like adoration of the 2nd amendment.
It's mass insanity, and I blame it mostly on the underlying cultural racism that never got addressed completely since the Civil War and the CRM, and the immense dominance of the capital, patriarchal class on every aspect of American experience.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
In STEM, engineering is the only field that is still holding out on the imperial system. It is stupid as hell. If you are an engineer and insist on using the imperial system, you are part of the problem. The only possible advantage the imperial system has over metric is that some conversions are in certain fixed multipliers. But it only make sense if you are working in the 17th century when precision was roughly about halves, quarters, dozens, and couple of dozens. It is mindbogglingly stupid to try to divide or multiple stuff today in quadruples. I don't care whether you like your toolset to be divided in 4 inch, 1 inch, 1/2 inch, 1/4 inch, 1/16 or 1/64 inch. It is still stupid. It only looks not stupid because you grew up using it, not because it makes any sense.
And you know what, if one day we do make contact with aliens, we can actually tell them how we measure stuff by indicating how we define it by fixed standards found in the universe, not by the arbitrary length of someone's foot back in the year 1098.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yes, Singapore sided with the US led world order because Singapore neede access to these important markets and technologies. It is in the interests of the Singapore people that at the time of independence, they place their bets with the US led world order. For that, the Singapore government had done the right thing and bring prosperity and stability to Singapore, stuff that Singaporean actually want.
Now the world is changing again, and the Singapore government has a balancing act they have to do between US and China. But they will do what is best for the people of Singapore, which is to remain neutral, and retain Singapore's sovereignty, access to the world's markets, talent pool and technologies, so the balancing act is in the interests of the people of Singapore.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@L98fiero That is such a regressive and dumb take. There is nothing in socialism that says the humanities and sociology are parasitic. If you people even bother to actually learn about dialetics, materialism, and what Marx and numerous Marxist/socialist scholars have expounded over the last 2 centuries, you will understand that humanities and sociology (yes that includes gender studies, racial studies, class studies, historical materialism, etc., etc.) are needed for a healthy society to grow.
Dialectic materialism, and the Marxist-Leninist system that China is BASED ON, is not a rejection of the arts, humanities, sociology or the human side of society. It is in fact, the fulfillment of it because socialism is all about fulfilling the utmost of human potential, to ensure the value of the people's labor belongs to them and the ultimate expression of social justice. All of these "woke" studies are naturally part of the socialist ideology.
The difference between the western idea of "wokeness" and the socialist idea of true egalitarianism is that the west likes to pretend that it cares about these issues, while hijacking these ideas for their own aganedas, weaponizing it, coommodifying it, and stripping these ideas of its radicalism for social justice, until it is a product of performance virtue signalling.
That does not mean these ideas are not worthy of pursuit, just because western capitalist system strip them completely of its true substance, which is ultimately about social justice and equality for all, prosperity for all. In fact, it is at this point of time, we need to RECLAIM these ideas from the bourgeoisie and give them back their true purpose.
I am so sick and tired of people in the comment thread treating these ideas, while tainted by western bourgeois corruption as though they are the same as western bourgeois corruption itself.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@charleshinton8565 You are looking at the wrong thing as usual from westerners who have very limited view of the world.
The point is that the USD is the financial colonialism power of the US. Making sure that it stays the dominant currency used in international trade is crucial to keep USD in demand and thus allow the Fed to print them with impunity. In turn, the USD circulating outside, which is basically real commodities being monetized returns to the US in the form of US treasuries, thus completely the cycle.
What mBridge and other de-dollarization efforts are doing is to break that cycle from different parts. mBridge breask using the USD for international trade. Dumping US treasuries and setting up alternate financial systems to deal with the USD circulating outside the US breaks the cycle of recycling back the USD to the US government.
All of these break the demand for USD, which are just worthless pieces of paper at the end of the day, because it is the commodities and services being sold and bought in USD that give that piece of paper purpose. The USD won't go away and will likely remain a well traded currency. But the point is that the demand for it will drop, for various reasons including the US government weaponizing it, will force the Feds unable to print money without causing a local hyperinflation and flatten the US economy. It will also cause borrowing costs to spiral upwards, forcing the US government to have to make cut backs and bringing it to its knees, hopefully neutering the imperialistic military.
Americans will either have to tighten their belts a lot, increase their efficiency in using their money to produce REAL value (military, finance, healthcare spending are not real valuable things) or they finally revolt and change their system that actually can deliver prosperity without exploiting other people and stealing the value they produce, which is exactly what using USD for international trade does.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Jaja_Dingdong Well, that depends on what the bias is. When one side is clearly the bad ones, bias against them is the correct route to take. It's like comparing between a serial ra*ist murderer and a person who ran a red light once and then complaining why a reporter is saying all the bad things the serial ra*ist murderer had done and not the traffic law violator. When the US is literally supporting gen*cide, while spreading lies about other countries' doing gen*cide, using its military to force countries to bend to their world order, use their economic and financial clout to lock countries in actual debt trap, force them to privatize everything so their companies can buy up everything, selling weapons to fuel conflicts, meddle and interfere with other countries internal affairs to destabilize them or to turn them pro-US against the wishes of their people and so much more (like a serial ra*ist murderer)
Then you complain why Ben is not talking much about the bad things on China which meteoric rise has been largely peaceful, has not bombed anyone for 40 years, invested heavily in developing countries building important, highly valuable, functional infrastructure and has been consistent in their foreign policy positions and while they make mistakes (like running a red light), they always backpeddle and reduce the harm and revamp their approach. And you are here telling us why Ben don't say bad things about China.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rimaq_ Exactly. As much as the western media wants to slander China unfairly and let's be clear the Chinese themselves will tell you that China is not perfect and have a lot of problems, the Chinese and many African countries share a common history: western imperialism from both Europe and America.
China's rise showed that there is another way to do it that is different from western model, and the existence of such model and its wild success is an existential threat to American capitalistic elites. Africa, South America and large parts of Asia can look at China and see that it is not merely FREEDOM(TM) that brings prosperity, peace and stability. Freedom follows prosperity and peace. China's freedom to decide its own destiny, and yes the Chinese people have a lot of influence on its government even if it is indirect, is guaranteed by China's current strength. America today would have destroy China if China could not defend itself, there is little doubt about that.
Africa nations can only have freedom from interference from western imperialism if they are strong themselves, and that means industrialization, economic growth and prosperity. China knows how to get there, and that's what they are telling thee Africans; the BRI is the manifestation of that will and it is making American elites shitting their pants as more and more countries tell America to f**k off.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@prasanth2601 It's not really that classified or that impressive. If it is, the US will not be panicking over China's rise. The US is already waging war on China and losing because China is basically destroying US hegemony, like de-dollarization, using its immense economic surpluses and expertise to lift up the Global South and dividing up US allies through its economic and diplomatic ties with Europe.
The more the US flexes its military against China, the more it exposes its weakness, because it shows that the US is running out of ideas to counter China. The world is inexorably shifting its center of power to Beijing, and there is nothing DC can do about. So it can only make alliances of convenience through military cooperation. Everyone is trying to decouple from the US dollar, no one is decoupling from China's economy.
The war is already here, and the Us is losing. No matter how good your tech is, when your economy is tatters, you can't support a giant military.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sonofyoutube6248 Yes indeed. GaN is a semiconductor, like silicon. But what GaN excel at is amplification because of its electrical properties. GaN based electronics (like transistors) can amplify power to a higher degree at higher energy efficiency, better thermal conductivity, lower weight and size than silicon electronics. All of this translated to more powerful output with significantly smaller and lighter equipment.
This means a GaN charger can be quite small and still output more power than the old school power bricks. This also mean that for applications that requires a lot of power, like an AESA radar that uses a lot of power to form beams of radiowaves, any improvement in delivering power, reducing heat and improving energy efficiency is crucial. Those antennas are power hungry, especially if you need to put those radars on fighter jets, big early warning planes, radar seekers in missiles. It means you can see farther, detect earlier, lock and shoot earlier and even more importantly, you can detect low-observable planes earlier than expected. This is why the US military need GaN and they are panicking.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1