Youtube comments of G L (@gelinrefira).

  1. I'm an application scientist for a German instrument company. We sell high end analytical instruments, each piece can sell upward to over a million. Just trying to sell one machine in SE Asia and India is like pulling teeth. Research institutes, agencies, even Government ones often do not have enough budget to buy even one and sometimes entire institute have to pool money to get one. But you need these instruments to do bleeding edge research especially in life sciences. In China, if they want it, they will get the budget to buy it. They buy not one, not two, they buy a dozens. A fricking dozens and they have these machines working and churning out data all the time. And they do it for multiple national labs, universities and even smaller institutes can still get the budget for one or two. The daring to innovate, and to requisite the resources to achieve those goals in China is astounding, it is simply on another level. Only America and Europe can come close to the level of budget that China can summon to get things they need to push to the bleeding edge. In research, having the money to do things is as important as having the people to do it. China has both and will not give up getting both to get things done. And they are focused, and relentless, optimistic and boundless in energy. Only those who visited China, talked to the people there, eat with them, drink with them and see them work understand this. China will get the chips they need. It is without any doubt that it will happen.
    1000
  2. 647
  3. 466
  4. 396
  5. 384
  6. 378
  7. 353
  8. 331
  9. I don't think de-dollarization is only about not using the dollars, although that is a large part of it. If China is indeed taking those USD they got back from selling those bonds and setting up THEIR own financial system to deal with the USD they own, they are still de-dollarizing. The USD system hinges primarily on the dollar recycling BACK into US in the form of bonds so the demand of the USD can be maintained and they don't get hyperinflation with the way the fed print money. If China, and Russia can create an independent financial system that can deal USD and Euros without ever touching US financial system, loans, bonds or whatever, then that is effectively de-dollarization. It is de-imperializing the USD, it is de-empire the financial empire of the US. And it will be fatal to the US. Unless you are telling me that the Feds can sanction any country by having records of all the legal tender they hold by each greenback's serial number and then literally voiding the legal tender of those serial numbers, then well, China and the world will have no choice but to de-dollarize in the most literal sense. But honestly, seeing China selling off the bonds at a loss just to get the physical dollars back is quite shocking, consider that the losses must be huge. They probably know that the US is mulling the ultimate sanction on China and they can no longer wait. After this election, if biden wins, he might go all-in trying to block China. And if he really even considering provoking a proxy conflict in East Asia the way the US did with Ukraine, then it will have to be in his second term because he has no more election to worry about and the US is out of time. That is unacceptable to China, so you are right that they will never want to be in the same position as Russia and the fact that they are doing this means they have very reliable intel that the US is going to try to do something extremely foolish. That is also unacceptable to us living in SE Asia too.
    331
  10. 329
  11. 317
  12. 240
  13. 219
  14. 218
  15. 211
  16. 210
  17. 206
  18. 202
  19. 200
  20. 198
  21. 186
  22. 182
  23. 180
  24. 176
  25. I visited Taiwan numerous times for work, and met many people there. I avoid talking politics with my colleagues as this is usually not conducive to a workplace environment. But when we chat outside of work, and sometimes we touch on the this touchy subject, the feeling I get from Taiwanese is that they are apprehensive about reunification for a variety of reasons like if they get to keep their current system (there is a lot of misrepresentation about what happened in HK in Taiwanese media), how their lives will change. However, they also think it is inevitable because the status quo cannot be kept like this forever but in the meantime, they will like to keep it like this for as long as they can. They usually do not think independence is a possibility or even a wise decision. The way I see it, is that the Chinese on both sides of the strait know that reunification is inevitable but they are in no hurry to do so. So they have very mixed feelings with the current Lai government. They know that the US is just using Taiwan as a chess piece against Greater China but they also like to believe they can play this game for a little longer. I think for the mainland, they are contend to just let it go on as long as possible and I think the main objective of Beijing should be enticing the Chinese on Taiwan and integrating their economy even tighter until reunification is a no-brainer. I'm sure that's what Beijing is trying to do right now. All of this of course will be thrown out of the window if the US has its way of turning Taiwan in the a western Pacific Ukraine.
    176
  26. 167
  27. 167
  28. 166
  29. 147
  30. 143
  31. I kind of glad that the Chinese market is not spending like drunk sailors, the way American/western capitalists think they would. Something has to change, and we can't keep driving this reckless, irresponsible, unsustainable economic model of consumption and growth. The Chinese people are more cautious about their finances and they are more responsible about governing their economy. The Chinese culture is not based on materialistic consumerism that rot the western culture and gave their oligarchs immense power. Yes, it is going to be tough but I think in the long run, changing the way we look at the economy, especially about how to shepherd it is vital for our future, especially when dealing with climate change and growing wealth inequality. There is no such thing as infinite growth, and we cannot keep going through this destructive boom and bust cycle. We must abandon the western capitalist model of economic thinking and switch to a more human centric, focus on public interests, sustainable way of governing the economy. Yes, you won't have these glitzy growth rate, and crazy profits per quarter but this form of economic thinking is ultimately self destructive and it will kill us all in the long run. I will even argue western capitalist model is one of the Great Filters that kills intelligent civilizations. China is willing to take on pain in the short and mid term in order to create a more equitable and sustainable economic model in the long run. I welcome China's new approach to governing the economy and the Chinese culture towards more cautious consumption. China is still on the path towards socialism and they are not going to be reckless with their economy. They will not tolerate cowboy financial shenanigans like Evergrande and Wall St. They won't bail these economic terrorists out, and I applaud them for it. Everyone should adjust accordingly. I have to correct you Sean. Wall St. do not believe in a rising tide lifts all boats. They want China to save them and when they are saved, they will revert to "F*ck you, I got mine." A n*ke on Wall St will literally make the world a better place instantly.
    142
  32. 139
  33. 137
  34. 135
  35. 132
  36. 131
  37. 126
  38. 123
  39. 122
  40. 120
  41. 118
  42. 116
  43. 116
  44. 112
  45. 112
  46. 104
  47. 104
  48. 103
  49. 99
  50. 96
  51. 92
  52. 90
  53. 90
  54. 90
  55. 90
  56. 89
  57. 87
  58. 85
  59. 81
  60. 81
  61. 80
  62. 80
  63. 80
  64. 77
  65. 75
  66. 74
  67. 69
  68. 69
  69. 68
  70. 68
  71. 67
  72. 67
  73. 67
  74. 65
  75. 62
  76. 61
  77. 61
  78. 61
  79. 60
  80. 58
  81. 57
  82. 57
  83. 57
  84. Their government style and philosophy and priorities are also completely completely. The CPC is driven primarily by development of the country and delivering promises made to the Chinese people. Their legitimacy, as Xi himself emphasize in their recent party general meeting comes from keeping the people happy with China's development, and if they fail, the Chinese will give them the boot very easily. Their system generally work around consultation, consensus building, and feedback from the people, choosing capable low ranking officials by locals and then moving up the ranks through meritocratic contributions. This creates a cadre of politicians that are highly motivated, civic-minded, very disciplined, strategic, smart and technocratic. It's not perfect because there is still a lot of corruption and the quality of bureaucrats and administrators can vary with top notch officials tend to gravitate towards large cities and centers of power, and lower quality officials stay at poorer, less developed provinces. But central planners know this and they have a strong oversight system. India OTOH is styled like western liberal democracy, in a culture that is far less developed politically and economically. The liberal western democratic doesn't even work very well in the west as nearly all western countries are completely hijacked by neoliberal capitalists and their democratic processes are often complicated, arcane, with lots of undemocratic elements built into it designed to nerf actual people power, and based mostly around theatrics, public and media manipulation, popularity contest, and big money support, not around merit or strength of character. This is exacerbated in India where corruption is even worse than China and billionaires and big businesses used even more underhanded methods to keep the people down, the economy suited to their interests and the politics controlled for their own power. Cheap labor can only get you so far, and China has proven yet again (last time by the Soviets) that some form of centrally planned economy is far more efficient than laissez-faire neoliberal capitalism or even classical liberalism at industrializing a country. China went further and developed their own socialistic model modified from Marxist-Leninist model, combining some elements of free market economy, with push for vital sectors for development and central long term, strategic planning while holding ultimate political power to prevent the billionaire class from taking over the country. Mid and high tech industry cannot survive on cheap labor alone, it requires infrastructure (stable electrical grid, transport, residences, factories, offices), high skilled labor (emphasis on education), political support, stability and security, and synergistic combination of various supporting industries all preferably within the same area. That's why the Guangzhou-Shenzhen bay area is the tech hub of the world today, and it was created from combining central planning (Shenzhen Special Economic Zone) with capitalist investment and market economy, up to a certain point. India's political situation cannot replicate these modes of governance. That's why India cannot copy China's model and it will not supersede China until they can resolve their fundamentals.
    54
  85. 54
  86. 54
  87. 54
  88. 53
  89. 53
  90. 53
  91. 52
  92. 52
  93. While Balakrishnan can say that Singapore must support international order, it must be pointed that the country that violates the most international laws is actually the US. What we are witnessing is the breakdown of the American empire and the rise of multipolarity, where more nations are gaining stronger sovereignty over their own country and escaping the western dominance. It is a mistake to view this as a crisis, that the world is breaking down. No, it is just the western order of neocolonialism that is breaking down. Singapore must be nimble to navigate this as an independent nation free from being obligated to the western order. Yes, Singapore has benefited from throwing our eggs in the western order basket. But now it is time to move into this multipolar world where we cannot depend on the west dominating everyone and shutting down dissent. If the FM is serious about protecting Singapore's sovereignty, then he must take Singapore's freedom to associate freely with any powers, any country seriously and to shed the western tinged goggles that the world is "breaking down". For 80% of the population in the world, their world is finally starting to be built up. That is the correct view the Singapore government should be taking because there are now many many opportunities for trade with new partners. If we are really serious about the international order, then we should also acknowledge that the Ansar Allah is blockading the Red Sea because ALL NATIONS are obligated to stop any gen*cide as stipulated in the Geneva Convention. What the Ansar Allah has done is essentially an economic sanction on the west. If the US can violate international laws, and trade regulations and unilaterally sanction hundreds of countries, then Ansar Allah has the right to sanction the west to respond to an ongoing gen*cide. I know the FM is a politcian and has to make sure Singapore does not offend the west, especially the US but here we can at least be able to call a spade a spade. Let us not delude ourselves into thinking that the Red Sea blockade is not directly tied to Israel's committing a gen*cide right in front of all of us brazenly, and the west remorseless and unconditional support for it. That is an actual breakdown of international order that the FM so valiantly is trying to defend.
    52
  94. 52
  95. The Chinese government will not likely allow the RMB to be freely floated and thus be speculated upon. There are Chinese Marxist economists like Hu Qiyuan even said monetary policy control shold be returned to the National People's Congress, not remain in the hands of central government bureaucracy, though he does advocate at the same time for more liberalization of the RMB to be utilized at higher rate in international trade. Controlling monetary supply and national capital is the key to socialist control over capitalists. It is what allows China to control their bourgeois class while reaping real economic growth in real assets like factories, technologies, agriculture, minerals, real estate, and of course the consumption of it. They are not interested in financializing their economy like what the neoliberals did to the US from the 80s onward. They are building their own financial system to secure their own capital and to lubricate economic development and international trade in real stuff, not to engage in fake stuff like financial speculation and wall street casino practices. They don't actually want RMB to become the next reserve currency like the way the USD is. They are not interested in that because the reserve currency status require complete liberalization of your currency and allowing it to float freely while you have to print enough money to support the financial market. In the end, you will turn your economy from making real things into gambling other people's money in fake, virtual stuff. That is antithetical to socialism. This is moreso shown in that they are developing cutting edge fintech that lubricate economic activities, not developing new derivatives and other speculative financial instruments. Their goals, philosophy and practice are fundamentally different from the neoliberal capitalist system in the US. It is something that western economists and financiers are supposedly scratching their heads over every time they "analyze" what China is doing. So either that they are truly are incapable of understanding it, or they are refusing to even acknowledge it by pretending to be confused over China's actions, and I'm inclined to believe the latter.
    52
  96. 50
  97. 50
  98. 49
  99. 49
  100. 47
  101. 47
  102. 46
  103. 46
  104. 45
  105. 45
  106. 45
  107. 45
  108. Yup. The crucial ingredients that all these videos refuse to admit is that Singapore government works, and they work for the people. Westerners cannot fathom, even want to admit that a government may not be an adversary to the people or the individual. They will not admit that the government is part of the country and the people can love their government and be part of the community. This is especially true to Americans who are brainwashed since young to treat the government as a necessary evil and is only there to screw things up. Only private companies are the best, and billionaires and other rich people are messiahs, they are the only ones who create jobs, create the economy, the titans of industries. Government people are evil and are not part of the community and they only seek to corrupt everything. Never mind that the government in these countries are controlled and corrupt by the private sector. This distorted view about government, the state, the people and private corporations is why they cannot understand how countries like Singapore, and dare I say to a large extent China can be so immensely successful. It must be cheating, some sort of repression, oppression by the government, stealing or whatever excuses they can come up with to explain anything, except the most obvious explanation: governments headed by PAP in Singapore or the CPC in China really do care about their people and country, and they do pursue policies that are crafted to benefit as many people as possible, and to maintain the health of the economy, and strive for common prosperity. The other thing they refuse to admit is that central planning works. Singapore is actually a hybrid system that combines using socialism and capitalism, with a very strong central planning ideology and pragmatism that is rooted in material reality and that the economy must be bend to serve the people. It is highly Hegelian and Marxist. It is in many ways, also Leninism that emphasize a strong central government control occupied by a cadre of politicians that has strong theoretical education and will to serve, to ensure the excesses of capitalism, and the vagaries of the market kept tightly under control and limited. They make capitalism work for them, not the other way around. To the westerner drunk on the capitalist cultural hegemony, this is not only unfathomable, it is literally evil incarnate. They cannot accept such a paradigm. What Singapore did is not replicatable in the west because their capitalist class, their oligarchs will not allow their government to exert such control over them. A lot of the principles pioneered by Singapore, especially by the PAP are actually being practiced in China, albeit with significant modifications, to a stunning success. But a westerner will rather put a gun into his mouth and blow his brains out than to admit that.
    45
  109. 44
  110. 44
  111. 44
  112. 44
  113. 43
  114. 43
  115. Singapore is a small country that has to be very careful in how it maneuvers in the international arena. Singapore must be neutral and principled and predictable in the way it deals with other nations. So it is understandable why Singapore does not want to get involve directly with the politics surrounding the gen*cide going on in Gaza committed by Israel. Yes, it is a gen*cide and yes it is absurd that YT will likely censor this comment if I don't type the word to bypass it. But Singapore's position cannot be tied to any one country, especially one that is becoming the pariah of the world even as the west tries to cover for Israel. We know the western media is lying, we know they are trying to do damage control and we know that no one outside the western media bubble is falling for it. If we want to be realpolitik, the west is only 17% of the world population, even including Australia, Japan and South Korea. The rest of the 83% of the world mostly have disagreed with the west on Ukraine and find the Gaza situation absolutely intolerable. Singapore should do well to understand that even if we are closely tied to the western regimes, we have to plan to exit the western world if things get worse. We need to keep all options open and we can never, ever be locked into supporting one side or another. On a more moral ground, the situation in Gaza is absolutely horrible, and if the Singapore government is still blindly supporting the west and Israel on this, it will inevitably earn the ire of the Singapore populations, especially our Muslim brothers and sisters. I know of more westernized angmohphile Singaporeans are very much brought into western propaganda and believe somehow this is a "complicated" situation but I don't think most other Singaporeans will see it that way, Chinese, Malays, Indians and all other peoples living here. It will be a mistake to underestimate how dissatisfied many Singaporeans are with the government's position with regards to Israel and Gaza. Tread carefully.
    43
  116. 43
  117. 43
  118. 42
  119. 42
  120. 42
  121. 41
  122. 41
  123. 40
  124. 40
  125. 40
  126. 40
  127. 40
  128. 40
  129. 40
  130. 39
  131. 39
  132. 39
  133. 39
  134. 39
  135. 38
  136. 38
  137. 38
  138. 38
  139. 37
  140. 37
  141. 37
  142. 37
  143. 36
  144. 36
  145. 36
  146. 36
  147. 36
  148. 35
  149. 35
  150. 34
  151. 34
  152. 34
  153. 34
  154. 34
  155. 33
  156. 33
  157. 32
  158. 32
  159. 32
  160. 32
  161. 31
  162. 31
  163. 31
  164. 30
  165. 30
  166. 30
  167. 30
  168. 30
  169. 30
  170. 30
  171. 30
  172. 30
  173. 30
  174. 30
  175. 29
  176. You just need 1 such missile to get through the defenses to give the carrier a very bad day. And countries like Russia and China has hundreds of them. China in particular, has anti-ship weapons in every form - ballistic from space, hypersonic from upper and lower atmosphere, supersonic, subsonic sea skimmers, they can be long range land based rocketry, or launched from jets (land based and carriers) and bombers, from subs (and also torpedoes), and surface ships. They have hundreds of each type in their inventory and even more for the cheaper, less capable ones and if sh*t really hits the fan, they have a complete manufacturing chain within their own country and suppliers from all over the world that will be nigh impossible to blockade and can churn these missiles out by the dozens, hundreds even every month. China now has 30% of the entire world's manufacturing capacity and probably even more if we care counting high tech manufacturing. Such an economy if switched to total war economy will be unstoppable. We are not talking about the launch of a dozen missiles at a carrier group. If the US really provoke a hot war with China, their carrier groups will be facing hundreds, if not thousands of missiles in multiple salvos coming from space, air and underwater in West Pacific. If US vassals dare to join up, they are looking at their entire navy wiped out within hours. This is just what they can do today. In 5, 10 years time, we will be seeing even more crazy stuff coming online that China is developing right now. Oh they can mine the entire first island chain if they really want to and ground shipping to Taiwan, Japan and South Korea into a halt and collapse their economy within weeks. Just look at what the Houthis have done to Israel shipping. China can do a 1000x more.
    29
  177. 29
  178. 29
  179. 29
  180. 29
  181. 29
  182. 29
  183. 28
  184. 28
  185. 28
  186. 28
  187. 27
  188. 27
  189. 27
  190. 27
  191. 27
  192. 27
  193. 27
  194. 27
  195. 26
  196. 26
  197. 26
  198. 26
  199. 26
  200. 26
  201. 26
  202. 25
  203. 25
  204. 25
  205. 25
  206. 25
  207. 24
  208. 24
  209. 24
  210. 24
  211. 24
  212. 24
  213. 24
  214. 24
  215. 24
  216. 23
  217. 23
  218. 23
  219. 23
  220. 23
  221. 23
  222. 23
  223. 23
  224. 23
  225. 23
  226. 22
  227. 22
  228. 22
  229. 22
  230. 22
  231. 22
  232. 22
  233. 22
  234. 22
  235. 22
  236. Think about it. blinken is saying that because most of the money is kept in the MIC and thus in America, supplying weapons to Ukraine is helping to boost the American economy. There are at least X problems with this statement. First, it assume that making weapons is good just because it provides jobs. That is vile, and weapons are not produce for consumption for the ordinary people, it is wasted resources that can otherwise be channel to more productive and better things. Second, it is saying that in a roundabout way, the war in Ukraine is basically exchanging Ukrainians lives for money to be generated and spent in America making weapons to be send to Ukraine. As long as the war continues, there is more excuse to create money out of thin air to feed the American MIC. This is beyond vile. This is just evil. And before anyone say Russia invaded Ukraine, it was the US that created the situation in the first place by crossing Russia's red lines and in bad faith not honoring any agreements made with Russia previously. Will you sit idly by when the bully is coming and telling you he is going to beat you up, and he is just flexing his muscle on you? I know this is an economic channel and Sean is just telling things the way it is, but you cannot look at these events, and the arguments put forth by American leadership and how they twist something so bizarrely evil into something the west and the rest of the world is supposed to stand behind, is just vomit-inducing. This is why I cannot wait to see the western imperialism collapse. Is it going to hurt us? Yes. But in the long run, it will be better for the rest of us not to have for people so vile, so evil controlling us.
    22
  237. 21
  238. 21
  239. 21
  240. 21
  241. 21
  242. 21
  243. De-risking, de-coupling is not weird, it's ideological. It's always ideological. America still wants to dominate but it has been dealt a fatal blow from China's rise so they are having an ideological crisis of faith where on one hand they want to think of themselves as above China and can control and dominate China for "freedom" and "democracy" (hahahahahahaha) but on the other hand, the material reality is their economy will collapse utterly if they force a decoupling from China and try to force their vassals to do the same. It was easy to decouple from the USSR because the Soviets never truly integrated their economy with the rest of the world. China is completely different. Nearly 200 countries in the world and over 120 of them boast China as their number one trading partner. Most of the rest have China as their number two or three trading partner. US cannot de-couple from China because that will mean decoupling from the world as no country will follow the US off that cliff. De-risking, friend-shoring is just desperation as it is a half baked measure it cannot fully remove the core industrial capabilities and technologies from China since China can either buy them from others or develop by themselves. The US is in the same position as the USSR during the Cold War but unlike the USSR, the US is not self-sufficient. We have come to a simple situation: Everything the collective west has or can do, China has and can do. Everything the west still has and China doesn't have, China can develop or buy from others. But what China has and can do, the west might not be able to have or can do. China cannot be stopped, contained or controlled by the west anymore, and it is driving the westoid neoliberals, nationalists and racists absolutely insane. All China needs to do is bide its time to wait for the critical inflection of the US economy and destroy them.
    21
  244. 21
  245. 21
  246. 21
  247. 21
  248. 21
  249. 21
  250. 21
  251. 21
  252. 20
  253. 20
  254. 20
  255. 20
  256. 20
  257. 20
  258. 20
  259. 20
  260. 20
  261. 20
  262. 20
  263. 19
  264. 19
  265. 19
  266. 19
  267. 19
  268. 19
  269. 19
  270. 19
  271. 18
  272. 18
  273. 18
  274. 18
  275. 18
  276. 18
  277. 18
  278. 18
  279. 18
  280. ​ @pgobservers No, the foundation of America is unsound. Their growth is based on unsustainable borrowing and military spending, and financial boondoggles. This cannot keep going forever. If you have been paying attention, you will also find that many countries, including Singapore's MAS has been buying gold to hedge against the US eventually unable to finance itself. If MAS is so confident in the western financial order, it will be buying US treasuries which is now at a very high interest rates, not going to buy huge amount of gold. Even European countries like Poland is buying huge amount of gold. China has now over 30% of manufacturing capacity of the entire world and is basically as much as the nearly entire west combined. Their economic foundation is far stronger because they can produce their way out. Meanwhile, the US can only borrow their way out and that cannot be sustainable even with the USD as reserve currency, which itself is losing it reserve currency power. These are just a few examples on why the west is on a unsteady footing and their leadership is woefully unprepared to navigate a growing multipolar world while the rest of the world is slowly coming out to take back their sovereignty. There are so many trends and signs from different sources, different angles that point to the same thing - the west is in decline and the US is sucking its vassals dry to sustain itself. You are exactly why I warned against consuming western propaganda blindly. Don't become too westernized in your worldview or you will get a distorted view of reality.
    18
  281. 18
  282. 18
  283. 18
  284. 18
  285. 18
  286. 17
  287. 17
  288. 17
  289. 17
  290. 17
  291. 17
  292. 17
  293. 17
  294. 17
  295. 17
  296. 17
  297. 17
  298. 17
  299. 17
  300. 17
  301. 17
  302. 16
  303. 16
  304. 16
  305. 16
  306. 16
  307. 16
  308. 16
  309. 16
  310. 16
  311. 16
  312. 16
  313. 16
  314. 16
  315. 16
  316. 15
  317. 15
  318. 15
  319. 15
  320. 15
  321. 15
  322. 15
  323. 15
  324. 15
  325. 15
  326. 15
  327. 15
  328. A Chinese historian pointed out that China did expand in the past but it often took a very long view for its conquest and tributaries. It can take decades if not centuries to assimilate, sinicized other peoples which is how places like Xizhang (Tibet) and Xinjiang became part of Greater China. Xizhang was conquered by the Mongols and incorporated into the Yuan Dynasty but it took most of the entire Ming Dynasty to assimilate the region as part of China proper. China did not really used western colonial style to expand their territory, which is to go into another people's land, plant a flag and start taking the lands and enslaving or destroying the locals. Western colonialism is brutal and often does not seek to assimilate the locals but to displace, replace or enslave them and it create an entire concept of virulent racism to justify that brutality. Such a concept is alien to the Chinese, which emphasize on tributaries, sinicization and slow incorporation. Which is why these places eventually did become part of China because at the end of it, they became Chinese. Even outside invaders like the Mongols (Yuan dynasty) and the Manchus (Qing dynasty) are themselves sinicized heavily . They became part of the conquered. That's why it is intellectually dishonest to equate the history of places like Xizhang and Xinjiang in the same vein as western colonialism, as though China acquired these lands through western style brutality, racism, hypocritical double standards, and oppression.
    15
  329. 15
  330. 15
  331. 15
  332. 15
  333. 15
  334. 15
  335. 15
  336. 15
  337. 15
  338. 15
  339. 14
  340. 14
  341. 14
  342. 14
  343. 14
  344. 14
  345. 14
  346. 14
  347. 14
  348. 14
  349. 14
  350. 14
  351. 14
  352. 14
  353. 14
  354. 14
  355. 14
  356. 14
  357. 14
  358. 13
  359. 13
  360. 13
  361. 13
  362. 13
  363. 13
  364. 13
  365. 13
  366. 13
  367. 13
  368. 13
  369. 13
  370. 13
  371. 13
  372. 13
  373. 13
  374. 13
  375. 13
  376. 13
  377. 13
  378. 13
  379. 13
  380. 12
  381. 12
  382. 12
  383. 12
  384. 12
  385. 12
  386. 12
  387. 12
  388. 12
  389. 12
  390. 12
  391. 12
  392. 12
  393. 12
  394. 12
  395. 12
  396. 12
  397. 12
  398. 12
  399. 12
  400. 12
  401. 12
  402. 12
  403. 12
  404. 12
  405. The problem with Americans is that a lot of them truly believe they are the good guys all the time. That no matter how bad they screwed up, or how nefarious their intentions are, they are still the good guys because the ASSUMED everyone opposing them is worse than them. It means that they believe in a very black and white worldview and dissenting narratives are not tolerated despite them saying they have freedom of speech. You get canceled if you say the wrong things, either through public opinion or through official channels. Dissenters are seldom explicitly censored so they can maintain an air of plausible deniability that they are practicing censorship. Like that article Brian showed naming him and his peers as Pro-China shills, they manipulate public opinion against dissenters in order to silent them. This is their MO for practicing information control and censorship. This also means that it frees them from any moral and ethical obligations when fighting themselves "evil" enemies. Which is why they can exercise double standards, being hypocritical and conveniently ignore facts against them, without any qualms. If you are fighting the devil, you use every trick in the book. No action is underhanded, unscrupulous, dishonourable when fighting the devil, right? It has gotten to such an absurd degree that they have been able to convince a disturbingly large segment of their population that Russia is bad for invading Ukraine. But Israel is the "most moral" army in the world, and there is totally no gen*cide in Gaza and Hamas is the evil one and the war begins at Oct 7. However, it is also clear that these public opinion manipulation is losing its power as non western countries don't buy it anymore, and westerners are growing tired and cynical towards their own media. The lack of support against Russian sanctions by non western nations, the huge number of protests around the world including in the west against Israel, and people simply not that interested in Xinjiang lies anymore is testaments to that. When the world is finally rid of American Imperialism and western domination, we need to have an international legal system to keep in check these propaganda and public opinion manipulation. China's leadership as usual, is prescient towards this and enacted control over their information sphere with the great firewall. This protected Chinese citizens from western social media invasion and manipulation and protected their citizens' data, achieving true data sovereignty. While the rest of the world gets attack with psyops and color revolutions. Western media needs to be collared and controlled after this is all over because they have proven to be nefarious and another tool by their empire's imperialists to attack other countries.
    12
  406. 12
  407. 12
  408. 12
  409. 12
  410. 12
  411. 12
  412. 12
  413. 11
  414. 11
  415. 11
  416. 11
  417. 11
  418. 11
  419. 11
  420. 11
  421. 11
  422. 11
  423. 11
  424. 11
  425. 11
  426. 11
  427. 11
  428. 11
  429. 11
  430. 11
  431. 11
  432. 11
  433. 11
  434. 11
  435. 11
  436. 11
  437. 11
  438. 11
  439. 11
  440. 11
  441. 11
  442. 11
  443. 11
  444. 11
  445. 11
  446. 11
  447. 11
  448. 11
  449. 11
  450. 11
  451. 10
  452. 10
  453. 10
  454. 10
  455. 10
  456. 10
  457. 10
  458. 10
  459. 10
  460. 10
  461. 10
  462. 10
  463. 10
  464. 10
  465. 10
  466. 10
  467. 10
  468. 10
  469. 10
  470. 10
  471. 10
  472. 10
  473. 10
  474. 10
  475. 10
  476. 10
  477. 10
  478. 10
  479. 10
  480. 10
  481. 10
  482. 10
  483. 10
  484. 10
  485. 10
  486. 10
  487. 10
  488. 10
  489. 10
  490. 10
  491. 10
  492. 10
  493. 10
  494. 9
  495. 9
  496. 9
  497. 9
  498. 9
  499. 9
  500. 9
  501. 9
  502. 9
  503. 9
  504. 9
  505. 9
  506. 9
  507. 9
  508. 9
  509. 9
  510. 9
  511. 9
  512. 9
  513. 9
  514. 9
  515. 9
  516. 9
  517. 9
  518. 9
  519. 9
  520. 9
  521. 9
  522. 9
  523. 9
  524. 9
  525. 9
  526. 9
  527. 9
  528. It is not really jealousy. It's fear. US politics has always been based on neoliberal ideologies, that the US government must have hegemony over the world and the corporate institutions form the backbone of US economy and power. That hegemony allows the US government, and by extension American corporations, to act with near impunity. They have done so since the end of WWII. You could say the Chinese government is doing the same thing but it is actually not that relevant. What is relevant is the thought process behind advancing and preserving American hegemony: they know if America loses that hegemony, American corporations will be relegated to second tier institutions. They will have to compete on equal grounds with the everyone else and they will not be able to enjoy the power, prestige and command over the world's economy and thus unable to exploit other countries and peoples with impunity. Losing that power, even the possibility, is driving the corporate world of America and the US political establishment insane. That's why you see so much hostility from western media and the US government. They don't want to lose that power to exploit with impunity and they know that they themselves can be targeted for exploitation and RETALIATION from their victims if they cannot control everything. I think most Americans can get used to a multipolar world where they are not automatically by default being catered to. But some Americans, especially conservatives and those with wealth and power, a multipolar world is nightmarish. Imagine an American billionaire arrested in Ghana for exploiting the country and subjected to Ghanaian laws, because Ghana has the economic strength to resist the US government. from China's backing. The victims of American exploitation and meddling will have the power to prosecute the Americans responsible for it, and there is nothing the US government or the west can do about it because if they tried to intervene like they did before, the collective economic and military might of the new bloc of nations lead by China will block them. That is the core of their hatred. They know a strong and an increasing influential China will deny them that power.
    9
  529. 9
  530. 9
  531. 9
  532. 9
  533. I doubt Japan will really want to fight a hot war with China when push comes to shove. A lot of these calculations made by US strategists hinges on everyone in west Pacific going against China at the behest of the US. I can assure everyone that no one in SE Asia wants a war with China. Phillipiness is just the dumb exception and they won't matter and even then I think they will balk. SK entire economy depends on China and Japan's economy is also heavily tied to China. Going to war with China will destroy all of them. While China will suffer, it won't collapse because it has the entire supply chain within its borders and now it has BRI that stretches across Eurasia and into Africa. Its supply chain won't be fatally threatened by the US and its vassals. In an all out war without nukes, China will win by attrition. The Chinese will be fighting for their homeland and the years of injustice, unfair treatment and humiliation they suffered at the hands of westerners will boil over if the US really attack China. Everyone can make that calculations and they did. Most of the war simulations done by the Pentagon showed even with Japan showing up, China will win at a great cost but they will win in a west Pacific war. You Americans think in the most childish, bloodthirsty and irresponsible ways because you have never gotten your mainland getting bombed to nothing before. So you think your invincibility allows your to do whatever you want and not suffer any consequences. This is not about freedom, or democracy, it is just Americans doing its "might makes right" BS.
    9
  534. 9
  535. 9
  536. 9
  537. 9
  538. 9
  539. 9
  540. 9
  541. 9
  542. 9
  543. 9
  544. A personal property is something you own that you use or consume. Like your toothbrush you use to brush your teeth, or your car that you use to move around or even your house that you live in. A private property is something you own that can generate capital. Like a factory that you bought or tell others to build for you because you have capital in the first place. Then you proceed to take the surplus value generated by the factory simply because you have your name on it. When the west seize Russian assets, they are taking the capital of Russia and giving it to their own private capital in the forms of weapons payment. Private property for private capitalists in the west are very much protected and will even have more private capital/properties. You and I and this OP have personal properties. We are not even in the club of owning private properties to be affected by this. But the fact that everything is becoming a subscription or leasing model means you don't even get to own personal properties anymore because all your personal properties are becoming the private properties of the private capital to extract rent out of. This is the problem with 99% of westerners. They are so miseducated about the economy and deliberately so, that they are not even equipped at a basic level to understand what's going on. It's like trying to do orbital mechanics by believing in an Earth centered system. It is also how you get people thinking that socialism is when the gubmint owns your car and completely miss that companies are trying to turn your car into their own private property by forcing you to get a subscription for its "extra" features.
    9
  545. This comment right here is why the rest of the world is moving away from western imperial core. The arrogance in slandering Singapore and China because they decided to focus on cooperation instead of conflict. I bet if Singapore say "we hate China", you will suddenly change your tune to "Singapore is so great!" So since Singapore decided to cooperate with China, you brand Singapore as authoritarian country helping China. The hypocrisy and double standards is so obvious that it is disgusting, and everyone can see it. Countries are moving out of US influence not because they hate freedom or they are authoritarian. It is because US has lost all credibility as a functional country that does not even obey the rule it imposed on others. It is because the US has consistently showed that they cannot be trusted and will only look at for its interests, at the expenses of everyone else. That the US will throw you under the bus for its own political goals. The world is gravitating towards China because everyone know it is the next rising power and that China has been consistent and rational and actually respect other countries' culture and sovereignty while the US has been invading and destroying countries that refuse to bend the knee, even go as far as weaponizing its own currency against its rivals. Go on, keep deluding yourself that the west are the good guys, and everyone is just authoritarian and anti-freedom and other bullshit you tell yourself to demonize others, so you don't have to face yourselves in the mirror and realized you are the bad guys.
    9
  546. 9
  547. 9
  548. 9
  549. 9
  550. 9
  551. 8
  552. 8
  553. 8
  554. 8
  555. 8
  556. 8
  557. 8
  558. 8
  559. 8
  560. 8
  561. 8
  562. 8
  563. 8
  564. 8
  565. 8
  566. 8
  567. 8
  568. 8
  569. The only side that is trying to provoke a war over Taiwan is the US. China already made it very clear where their red line is with the One China Policy, which even the US has agreed to respect on the surface. Yet the US is trying to disrupt the status quo by deliberately stepping on the red line trying to force a reaction out of China. It will be like China putting nuclear missiles on Cuba like back during the missile crisis knowing full well that is the US red line. If you do not respect other countries' security concerns and sovereignty, no amount of talk about freedom or liberty will give you any moral high ground. No one in the west Pacific wants war and everyone can see it is the US provoking one. Only westerners are arrogant and blind enough to believe that the US is trying to protect Taiwan. Yea, by deliberately forcing Taiwan into a dangerous situation knowing full well how China and the Chinese people feel about the island. It will be as though China goes to Hawaii and fund and provide weapons to separatist groups there, then claim that Hawaii is now a country and have the right to secede from the union. To the Chinese, and most of the world, that is exactly what the westerners are doing when they start to claim that Taiwan is a country. If you think China is going to be a pushover, you are going to be in for a nasty surprise. Moreover, China is governed by a highly rational, highly intelligent and disciplined corp of technocrats. If they are really as incompetent as you westerners love to delude yourselves with, then why worry about China? Because deep down you know China cannot be beaten down anymore. The Chinese government is far less likely to be move into making geopolitical mistakes than the US and the west which are more into ideological dogma and purity tests than actually governing their countries. The restrain they have shown, and yes it is restraint over pelosi's dumbass visit to Taiwan showed that level of discipline. They didn't start a war even when their own country has been invaded. On that alone, China only have to bide its time and continue to grow stronger and build alliances with countries put down and brutalized by the west. Within 10, 20 years China will find a way to reunify Taiwan peacefully. If war comes to the west Pacific, we will all know it will be caused by the US, and the whole of East Asia will turn against the US. Even Japan and South Korea will find itself in an extremely difficult position.
    8
  570. 8
  571. 8
  572. 8
  573. 8
  574. 8
  575. 8
  576. 8
  577. 8
  578. 8
  579. 8
  580. 8
  581. 8
  582. 8
  583. 8
  584. 8
  585. 8
  586. 8
  587. 8
  588. 8
  589. 8
  590. 8
  591. 8
  592. 8
  593. 8
  594. 8
  595. 8
  596. 8
  597. 8
  598. 8
  599. 8
  600. 8
  601. 8
  602. 8
  603. 8
  604. 8
  605. 8
  606. 8
  607. 8
  608. 8
  609. 8
  610. 8
  611. 8
  612. 8
  613. 8
  614. 8
  615. 8
  616. 8
  617. 8
  618. 8
  619. 8
  620. 8
  621. 8
  622. 8
  623. 8
  624. 8
  625. 8
  626. 8
  627. 7
  628.  @lydiawhitting5406  LOL that's what you have been hearing from western media. Nearly all the projects that China has done with the Belt and Road Initiatives have been tremendous help to the countries who participate. They get roads, ports, basic infrastructure, like electricity and hospitals that can uplift their people out of poverty. These infrastructure are also built according to the country's needs, not the needs of the MNC to extract resources. The fact is that what you described is exactly what the west has done to Africa but China is doing the opposite, so you are fed these lies by your own media. The debt trap diplomacy is made up and came out almost altogether at the same time, showing a coordinated information warfare against China by the west collectively. China has not confiscated anything nor can they do that nor have the desire to, they have not pressured anyone to take the loans they don't want, they did not deliberately give out loans knowing they can't be paid off, and they have always refinanced the loans if the loaners ran into difficulties. That's why the US government is panicking trying to rein in China's BRI by attempting to bring their own initiative online... and failing miserably because it was obvious to everyone it is just a counter to China and not serious project and the amount offer is often insultingly small, and all they talk about is China China China and nothing about the interests of the locals. It's insincere and patronizing and insulting. That's why the the Summit of the Americas failed miserably because the US treated all the American countries like they are under its boots, and you think people have no dignity and self-respect. For the US, there is only I dominate, and you submit. Fact is China's cooperation is always based on a win-win mentality that benefits all sides. They get access to a new market, the countries get help they desperately need. Recent polls across the Global South have shown that people view China generally favorably despite western information warfare. You just don't like that China is actually helping, and winning the hearts and minds of the Global South.
    7
  629. 7
  630. 7
  631. 7
  632. 7
  633. 7
  634. 7
  635. 7
  636. 7
  637. 7
  638. 7
  639. 7
  640. 7
  641. 7
  642. 7
  643. 7
  644. 7
  645. 7
  646. 7
  647. 7
  648. 7
  649. 7
  650. 7
  651. 7
  652. 7
  653. 7
  654. 7
  655. 7
  656. 7
  657. 7
  658. 7
  659. 7
  660. 7
  661. 7
  662. 7
  663. 7
  664. 7
  665. 7
  666. 7
  667. 7
  668. 7
  669. 7
  670. 7
  671. 7
  672. 7
  673. 7
  674. 7
  675. 7
  676. 7
  677. 7
  678. 7
  679. 7
  680. 7
  681. 7
  682. 7
  683. 7
  684. 7
  685. 7
  686. 7
  687. 7
  688. 7
  689. 7
  690. 7
  691. 7
  692. 7
  693. 7
  694. 7
  695. 7
  696. 7
  697. 7
  698. 7
  699. 7
  700. 7
  701. 7
  702.  @625as-pj5mg  yes the PBOC is the central bank, but the Bank of China, the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, etc. are some of the biggest banks in the world and they are still state owned, or at least the state has large control over them. The PBOC does what central banks do, like controlling the monetary policies and money printing. The other commercial banks do what commercial banks do. The difference is that the Chinese government still has a lot of control over the commercial banks, and this control over the vast majority of the capital assets of China, allowing them to move immense amount of capital for national strategic objectives, and to protect the collective wealth of the people from speculation and extraction. That's one of the key point of Marxist-Leninism, and socialism with Chinese Characteristics. Private capital, while big in China is absolutely dwarfed by these state controlled commercial banks. It is why Jack Ma was hammered into the ground (deservedly so) by Chinese authorities because he wanted to create a shadow bank by using Alipay to do commercial banking services while disguising it as an innocuous payment system to skirt regulations. It is also why Chinese government has the power to hammer jack ma in the first place. Essentially, jack ma wanted to coup the Chinese government control of capital. It is the most important reason western capitalists absolutely hate, hate, hate China with a burning rage. This is what they want to destroy, to "liberate" China from.
    7
  703. 6
  704. 6
  705. 6
  706. 6
  707. 6
  708. 6
  709. 6
  710. ​ @K2teknik.  Nah, it can be well-defined. It is just that the definition in the west is deliberately incomplete because it focused exclusively on only one exact type of procedure of democracy and the ideological purity of those procedures (ie, voting) and do not consider the results of those procedures. It simply makes the self-serving assumption that the procedures when used will automatically produce democracy. It merely considers the corruption, perversion of those procedures as minor annoyances and not as a proof that the ideology and practice don't work. It is all ideology and no real praxis, or at least the west pretends the praxis work. The results from these procedures, when hijacked by corrupting capitalist forces ultimately show that the system it engendered is not democracy. It is actually deeply anti-democratic. Of course, it also conveniently automatically dismisses every other form of democracy because as someone said the west is automatically assumed to always be ontologically right, and everyone else is ontologically wrong. That's why the China's full process democracy is dismissed as not democracy when it literally produces results that the Chinese people want and that it allows the Chinese people to hold their government to the fire when they are unhappy. Yet, the absolutely corrupted bourgeois democracy of the US, where money flows so freely and so legally that no one even bothers to be surprised at how corrupted the system is, consistently producing anti-democratic results, is somehow more democratic than China. Heck, everyone keeps saying that the democracy in the US is broken and lobbying is terrible, yet somehow it is still better than China. The only thing the US has, is that they can keep pretending they have the procedure and that the procedure is simply better, without actually proving it is better. In fact, it has been proven to be one of the worse way to practice democracy. Basically, the west is full of BS but it pretends that it is not and demands everyone to believe it.
    6
  711. 6
  712. I think the covid and the real estate problem should be put in proper context. China came out of covid later than the rest of the world but with a death toll per capita far far lower than most of the world for a gigantic country. Yes, covid measure did a number on China's economy but it save potentially millions, if not tens of millions of lives. Those lives if lost could have done far immeasurably damage to China. Can you imagine if Liang Wenfeng died in covid, then we will never have DeepSeek. As for the housing market, it was a bubble built by an overheating market with developers making dangerous bets, and unsound financial decisions. The bubble had to be pop, and China did it on THEIR terms. It is because of what they did, that China avoid a 2008-like financial disaster. If the bubble burst later than sooner, the financial fallout from those bad loans, bad business practices would have been absolustely devastating. The Chinese government did the right and have accomplish what no one has done in history; successfully pop a bubble and managed its draw down and reduce its fallout to a minimum. The objective assessment of situations and rational management of any crisis or preventing the crisis in the first place is the proof of the strategic brilliance and administrative acumen and erudite of Chinese leadership. It is why China has already won this century because no country, no society, no culture can consistently produce leaders of such high caliber and a system that can move with the leadership.
    6
  713. 6
  714. 6
  715. 6
  716. 6
  717. 6
  718. 6
  719. 6
  720. 6
  721. 6
  722. 6
  723. 6
  724. 6
  725. These narratives have been going on for some time on the online communities like Reddit. The usual being talking points like China is the biggest carbon emitter, China is building coal plants, they even say the dams China built are destroying people lives because they have to be relocated and areas flooded, ignoring the fact that the US did this long ago too. Many times they remove Native Americans from their ancestral homelands for these projects. Often they remove them just to steal their lands but somehow China is the bad guy. But I am also seeing that these rhetoric are beginning to crack as more and more people are countering with per capita emission, and even historical emission. As far as I know, I was one of the first few to post counter narratives to China carbon emission by pointing out the historical emission of the collective west. Ben used the analogy of an arsonist telling his neighbor not to burn down the house. I use the analogy that it is like you have older brothers who took all the inheritance from your dead father and left you with nothing, and then look down on you for working at McDonald's to survive. There is only so much the planet can support, a carbon debt pool if you will, that if we used it up, there is not enough to go around. So the collective west used up all the carbon debt for their industrialization, achieved a high standard of living, continues to support their wasteful lifestyles (American lifestyle are especially, disgustingly wasteful) and then lecture everyone else for trying to pull their people out of poverty using the same accessible, cheap energy sources. Climate change lecturing by the west, and especially by the US is appallingly hypocritical and another insane injustice they have inflicted on the world. Instead of allowing them to put up these theatrical charades, the west needs to be be forced, even at gun point, to pay climate reparations to everyone else.
    6
  726. 6
  727. 6
  728. 6
  729. 6
  730. Thanks for pointing out that Chinese investors have been building factories in Mexico to get around the tariffs. But it is very telling that China is investing heavily in Mexico and turning it into the factory of NA. In the end, Mexico benefitted heavily from these FDI from China while China is able to keep exporting to the US in a roundabout way. What is even more telling is that China is not building military bases in Mexico while the US is building more bases to try to contain China. Instead, China is building factories. Ultimately, even with higher prices, Chinese Mexican factories will still likely to more price competitive than US manufacturers so even with higher prices, the American people still benefit from it. Not that you will ever hear them ever admitting that. The American people have long enjoyed cheap goods from China that kept their inflation to a minimum and they really do not appreciate just how much China has done for them. They can only want China as the producer of cheap, low value goods or mid-tier goods. They want to keep the label "Designed in California, made in China" forever. But China does not want to be the cheap laborers for the US empire and the moment they moved up the value chain, the Americans stop being nice. The blatant hypocrisy and neocolonial mindsets of Americans are what's causing this new cold war, not because China is some evil empire. It's time Americans learn what pain really mean when inflation keep going up and they can't just print money to pay for stuff anymore.
    6
  731. 6
  732. 6
  733. 6
  734. 6
  735. 6
  736.  @davidmoss2576  The irony is that you don't even have to go back that far to see how national hubris can cause the downfall of a country. China's Century of humiliation was basically the hubris of the Qing Dynasty and its inability to reform, improve, adapt and fundamentally changed for the better. Japan during the Meiji Restoration was the direct opposite, and they beat China at the time when they barely got out of a revolution and still struggling to even do basic things. The results spoke for itself. Now it is the west repeating the same mistakes as the Qing Dynasty: too proud to admit that they are wrong and unable to humble themselves to learn from their own mistakes and from other people who have found success. It's not just the military, it's everything. China uplifted 700 over million people out of poverty and built the most vertically integrated, dynamic economy in the world right now and the CPC still enjoys a fairly high approval rating from its people. Obviously they are doing something right. While America and the west is facing a shrinking middle class, rising poverty and wealth inequality, social unrest, rise of right wing extremism and generally incompetence and inability of their political systems to resolve any fundamental issue. Obviously, something is deeply wrong. And yet we still have people here criticizing China unabashedly and refusing to even acknowledge that, yes they have done something right. Without even that level of self awareness and reflection, the west is basically behaving like the Qing Dynasty at its twilight. History may not repeat itself, but it really does rhyme.
    6
  737. 6
  738. 6
  739. 6
  740. 6
  741. 6
  742. 6
  743. 6
  744. 6
  745. 6
  746. 6
  747. 6
  748. 6
  749. 6
  750. 6
  751. 6
  752. 6
  753. 6
  754. 6
  755. 6
  756. 6
  757. 6
  758. 6
  759. 6
  760. 6
  761. 6
  762. 6
  763. 6
  764. 6
  765. 6
  766. 6
  767. 6
  768. 6
  769. 6
  770. 6
  771. 6
  772. 6
  773. 6
  774. 6
  775. 6
  776. 6
  777. 6
  778. 6
  779. 6
  780. 6
  781. 6
  782. 6
  783. 6
  784. 6
  785. 6
  786. 6
  787. 6
  788. Concentrating on GDP is a mistake. China is planning for the long haul to reduce its reliance on fossil fuel and increase on renewable and nuclear because that offers far more energy security than fossil fuel since China can make its own solar panel, wind turbines and nuclear reactors while it can source all these raw materials from diverse sources and China itself is a huge rare Earth elements producer. Second, pollution and environmental issues are real problems and China is not virtue signalling here. The reason why China's life expectancy has soared must have a lot to do with improving its urban air quality. Better health = less demand on healthcare = longer life expectancy = happier, more productive citizens. This is a no brainer. Third, renewable and nuclear industries are the industries of the future, like semiconductors and EVs, has only room to grow and expand into. China need industries that are sustainable and can make money because it has to create jobs for hundreds of millions of working adults and only long term, high value, high tech, sustainable industries can provide that kind of jobs. If China truly wants to play the number games like GDP, then all they have to do is attack the financial industries and release capital control and turn its state banks into Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase clones. But that is a short-sighted, ultimately futile and immoral industries that depends on absorbing other countries' surpluses to sustain, which means China will be force to go the imperialism route, just like the US today. China chose not to go down this neoliberal evil path because they are socialists.
    6
  789. 6
  790. 6
  791. 6
  792. 6
  793. 5
  794. 5
  795. 5
  796. 5
  797. 5
  798. 5
  799. 5
  800. 5
  801. 5
  802. 5
  803. 5
  804. 5
  805. 5
  806. 5
  807. 5
  808. 5
  809. 5
  810. 5
  811. 5
  812. 5
  813. 5
  814. 5
  815. 5
  816. 5
  817. 5
  818. 5
  819. 5
  820. 5
  821. 5
  822. 5
  823. 5
  824. 5
  825. 5
  826. 5
  827. 5
  828. 5
  829. 5
  830. 5
  831. 5
  832. 5
  833. 5
  834. 5
  835. 5
  836. 5
  837. 5
  838. It is true that the US does have a lot of mothballed shipyards. But bringing them up to modern standards and equipping them, hiring the people (if there are even enough qualified people) and create the entire supply chain to reactivate these shipyards is a pipe dream. If the US can't even muster the organization, resources, capital to even re-scale their semiconductor industry up to match even a fraction of that China has, then what credential do they have to say they can do the same for these shipyards to match the capacity of China? At a lower cost, since they want to copy China's model of dual use for civilian and military? Fat chance. This is in the context that China is barely even using the capacity of their entire shipbuilding industry to build their warships. If China gets serious and they are willing to take an economic hit to convert their civilian ship orders to warship orders, they can churn out warships several times faster than what they are doing now. And what they are doing now is already outstripping US, Japan and South Korea warship building. If China really get serious, for every ship US, South and Japan, even Europe can build, China can build a dozen. By the time the collective west can assemble an armada to invade China, assuming that if the collective west did not collapse from economic disaster of full decoupling from China and the world, China would have built 10 times that armada. For every anti-missile missile the west can load up in their VLS, China can build and launch 20 anti-ship missiles at them. This is not even a contest.
    5
  839. 5
  840. 5
  841. 5
  842. 5
  843. 5
  844. 5
  845. 5
  846. 5
  847. 5
  848. 5
  849. 5
  850. 5
  851. 5
  852. 5
  853. 5
  854. 5
  855. 5
  856. 5
  857. 5
  858. 5
  859. 5
  860. 5
  861. 5
  862. 5
  863. 5
  864. 5
  865. 5
  866. 5
  867. 5
  868. 5
  869. 5
  870. 5
  871. 5
  872. 5
  873. 5
  874. 5
  875. 5
  876. 5
  877. 5
  878. 5
  879. 5
  880. 5
  881. 5
  882. 5
  883. 5
  884. 5
  885. 5
  886. 5
  887. 5
  888. 5
  889. 5
  890. 5
  891. 5
  892. 5
  893. 5
  894. 5
  895. 5
  896. 5
  897. 5
  898. 5
  899. 5
  900. 5
  901. 5
  902. 5
  903. 5
  904. 5
  905. 5
  906. 5
  907. 5
  908. 5
  909. 5
  910. 5
  911. 5
  912. 5
  913. 5
  914. 5
  915. 5
  916. 5
  917. 5
  918. 5
  919. 5
  920. 5
  921. 5
  922. 5
  923. 5
  924. 5
  925. 5
  926. 5
  927. 5
  928. 5
  929. 5
  930. 5
  931. 5
  932. 5
  933. 5
  934. 5
  935. 5
  936. 5
  937. 5
  938. 5
  939. 5
  940. 5
  941. 5
  942. 5
  943. 4
  944. 4
  945. 4
  946. 4
  947. 4
  948. 4
  949. 4
  950. 4
  951. 4
  952. 4
  953. 4
  954. 4
  955. 4
  956. 4
  957. 4
  958. 4
  959. 4
  960. 4
  961. 4
  962. 4
  963. 4
  964. The way I see it is that the US is the most carbon emitting country in history with the Europeans a close 2nd. That historical carbon emission is why we are having climate change, not just the current emission. Climate change has been making these wild fires in recent years more and more insane. This is well known by now. Yet, the US are woefully under prepared for such a disaster and in fact has been cutting corners on their firefighting capability. So when the perfect wild fire strike, fueled by climate change of America's doing, coupled with inadequate firefighting capabilities and short-sighted policies and the cultural and economical cheapness of using wood as building materials, all come together to give the US the karma slap of the decade. This is in stark contrast to the Chongqing fire just 2 years ago where China mobilized huge amount of resources and the people coming together to literally, physically made firebreaks that stopped the fires from reaching the city. Even more relevant is the earthquake in Xizhang that happened almost the same time as the LA fire, and we saw Chinese mobilize their disaster management immediately, reaching the disaster area within hours, and supplies poured in within 24 hours. Tents, firefighting, doctors, medical supplies, heating, all poured into a region thousands of feet above sea level. It's hilarious too in the background of tiktok getting banned and Americans migrating to Rednote, an even more Chinese social media app and finding out that the Chinese people are nice, welcoming and funny. Even worse, they are finding out that the Chinese don't live in an authoritarian hellscape but instead enjoy affordable healthcare, groceries, world class transportation and safety unheard of in the US. People are posting angry and sad videos on the soon to be banned tiktok and on Rednote, saying how they have been lied to all their lives. That the only result the American system has produce is astronomical profits on the backs of ordinary Americans. I find it amusing why Americans still act outraged by how under prepared they are for disasters at nice Katrina, and how their system does not incentivize spending money on things that don't make profits. If people is lamenting now, what are they going to do when the inevitable California earthquake strikes? Good luck America.
    4
  965. 4
  966. 4
  967. 4
  968. The only people who keep saying China is going to invade Taiwan are the Americans. China does not want to invade Taiwan, so long Taiwan does not declare independence. That's the red line. Respect that, and respect the One China policy and nothing will happen and reunification will be done peacefully. It will be like China going to Texas and supporting Texan separatists and encouraging Confederate ideologies for secession and then turn around and say "well Texas is a country now." Ohh, f** that. Let me tell you, any side that forces SE Asian nations to choose a side, is gonna find them choosing the opposite side because if there is one thing SE Asian nations really hate is to be forced to choose sides in a conflict that is none of their business. The more the US government pushes SE Asia, the more it is going to alienate themselves. The more the US acts with arrogance and entitlement, the more it is going to turn off SE Asian nations and its people. One of which is the US keep misrepresenting that China is or want to invade Taiwan. We all know it is not true, we all know what the stakes are, and we are really really tired and pissed off at western disinformation. It doesn't work on us, so STFU and go home and fixed your own house first before coming to threaten Singapore that they "might need make some hard decisions." I think the one who is going to make some hard decisions is America finally acknowledging that China's rise is inevitable and good, and prepare to engage with the world normally as a participant and not as a tyrant.
    4
  969. 4
  970. 4
  971. 4
  972. 4
  973. 4
  974. 4
  975. 4
  976. 4
  977. 4
  978. 4
  979. 4
  980. 4
  981. 4
  982. I have been on Xiaohongshu recently and there are actually quite a number of Chinese military watchers and insiders on there. Usually they provide some insider information that is not very crucial to national secrecy which is still fascinating. One watcher was commenting on the recent speech made by the Chinese speaker at UN security council rebutting the US for accusing China of secretly helping Russia war efforts. He said if China is really helping Russia, the situation on the ground today will not be like this. He pointed out correctly that the war was primarily still determined by artillery and of course we all know watching this channel just how woeful western production of shells is. He said he did visit to the Scranton shell production factory before and he was saying that they were able to rapidly open 2 more production lines and scale up from 7000 shells per month to 50,000 shells. He said that Rheinmetall is probably producing 10,000 now and the French add another 7000 per month. He said there is no way to really know how many shells China is producing per month but he pointed out he read a report on the shell production for a military exercise called "Sharp Sword" recently. The report is really just to say that the production line has ramped up to ensure the exercise will have enough shells to use and very casually mentioned that single production is producing 150,000 shells PER DAY. Not per month, not per week. PER DAY. From one production line. If China is really helping Russia by supplying military equipment, the war would be over a long time ago..
    4
  983. 4
  984. 4
  985. 4
  986. 4
  987. 4
  988. 4
  989. 4
  990. 4
  991. 4
  992. Forcing the US to pay more for their loans will be a good thing for world peace. The US military is supported by these loans. So if they have to pay more to finance their debts, they cannot use that money to put into their war budget. At some point, the interests on the debts will be too high to support such an exorbitant spending and they will have to cut back their military. Or they cut their welfare to such bare minimum their people will be at rock bottom. Either way, something gotta give and the faster their war budget collapse, the less they are going to be able to threaten other countries with violence and war. The less threatening their military become, the less they are able to enforce their hegemony, less they are able to enforce the USD as the dominant reserve currency, and it will feedback loop into less influential the dollar has. The whole exercise is to force their military down by crashing their economy and the more the world get rid of US hegemony. It will also ultimately benefit the American people because their country is basically hijacked by corporate interests, especially the MIC. They cannot break this stranglehold, which is why their quality of life is decreasing. By crashing their economy, the hope is that they themselves will be able to neuter the MIC and seize their country back. If the American people can actually be in charge, and not the neoliberal oligarchs, it might be possible to create a new world order when the new generation of American leaders can learn to live in a multipolar world. You cannot hope to create a multipolar world with the American oligarchs in power.
    4
  993. 4
  994. 4
  995.  @Shenzhou.  I do agree with your theme and think that the west has a deliberately narrow view of democracy. Democracy still means "rule by the people". We are just so used to democracy being always practiced with the western liberal democratic process that we forget ultimately, as long as the people can hold the government accountable, it is still democracy, a republic. I think we should broaden our definition and measurement of democracy that include the RESULTS of policies and laws enacted by the ruling government, and the people's satisfaction with the outcomes. Because if we start doing that, I bet the west will not do well with this metric to measure democracy. There is even a Harvard study that look at the results of US government policies and concluded that most of those policies benefit the upper class, super wealthy, even concluding that if you just based on the results, America is a plutocracy, not a democracy. Less than half of the American people have confidence in their government to do right by them because US government policies from local, to state to federal seldom benefit the people and their economic situation. It's where the concept of Occupy Wall St, and the One-percenter comes from. People know that the US government is not working for them. So how is that even a democracy? Because they can vote for anything? Pleasssseeee... On the other hand, there are countries that are ruled mostly by a single party or do not have much opposition but their policies and laws have resulted in tremendous uplifting of their people, and they continue to govern with the public's interests as top priority. The people are generally satisfied with their government's performance so they don't find really a need to vote them out. In other examples, they might have stronger parity of powers within their political system but their people still generally believe in their system to deliver real results so their politics are still less insane and more effective than American politics. I think there should be think tanks in China established to rethink the notion of democracy and redefine it so it reflect reality and results, instead of superficial criteria like having oppositions and adopt an American style political adversarial system as the standard to define democracy. There should be a new metric of measurement: Results of policies / Will of the people. The perfect democratic government should approach 1, because it will mean the policies reflect the people's will and the efficiency of these policies to deliver results. I think America and some western countries will score very low on this metric. Ultimately, that metric will bypass the control that the powerful and wealthy over their country's politics and media (eg. America) and actually show without a doubt who is really in charge in that country. We have to reclaim democracy for ourselves, like how oppressed people reclaim the objects of their oppression and over come them.
    4
  996. ​ @ex0duzz CNA also neglected to point out these disputes over claims in SCS are claims that SE Asia nations made during the time when China was the weakest in the time period after the CPC won. After decolonization of SE Asia and the reestablishment of these SE Asian nations, these nations have a little bit of navy so they went out to stake their claims on these islands when China was too weak to challenge those claims because Mainland China had no navy to do so. Now China is back on the world's stage, they are reclaiming those islands that have been under China's rule or influence for centuries. Everyone drew their own dash lines but somehow it is China's lines that offends everyone. Instead of settling the issue like adults, Philippines chose hostility because it think big bro US will back them. Not even Vietnam wants to go to war over these islands, and Malaysia is happily selling whatever they drilled up or fished up in SCS to China and China is happily buying them. So the only one who has a problem with China's coast guard is Philippines and it is because they choose to be America's lap dogs, not because they are right or moral. China made those claims, SE Asian nations made their claims. The best way is to settle them bilaterally, or as a bloc with negotiations or even through UN apparatuses. China is indisputably a superpower now, and unlike the US has conducted themselves with diplomacy with whoever. It is immensely tone-deaf to reduce China to another third-rate power or an imperialistic power and treat them as such, just because you get brainwashed by western propaganda. China has settled all its land disputes peacefully (even with Russia) except for India because India chose hostility. So it is a FACT that China always chooses the peaceful route as long as the other side is willing to negotiate in good faith. If you choose hostility against China and lose (and you will lose, almost guaranteed in any confrontation), then you squandered the chance to gain a win-win solution and you will be in a far worse position when you inevitably have to negotiate with China anyway. So choosing hostility against China is not only st*pid, it is wrong and immoral against the best interests of your country when diplomacy would have been the easier and more equitable option.
    4
  997. One important point that should be made is the difference between East Asian culture of manhood Vs American. In anime, you will see a quirky thing is that somewhere along the story, the protag will be asked, "what are you trying to protect (mamoru)? Why do you want to be strong?" This goes directly to a large part of East Asia cultures (Japan, China, Korea etc.) is that you are not alone and you derive your greatest strength from service and selflessness. Protecting something or someone is what gives you conviction and determination. In contrast, this is very very different from American culture where media aimed at teenagers tends to be all about bursting out of your shell and leaving everything and everyone behind, including your family, friends and most importantly any social and civic obligations. It is always about what you want, but it is never about what your role can be. Now of course, there are always exceptions to the rule, like the American cultural obsession with military service, but it generally holds. OTOH, in East Asian cultures, the struggle between finding yourself and finding your role in life is always examined in teenage media. It is always a balance between oneself and one's dreams and one's obligations to others. For East Asians, happiness and fulfillment comes from connecting with people, family, friends, lovers and reconciling that with oneself. The individual is part of the collective and the collective is more than the sum of the individuals. It is very different from the toxic, hyperindividualism in America and western culture in general. It is about not being alienated from your community while maintaining one's own individuality. Which is why in most shounen media, the protag usually achieve his ultimate strength when he is with his people, lifting them up while they lift him up. That's why "mamoru" and "nakama power" are troupes in Japanese media. It is through the harmonious integration of everyone's strength and their understanding of their roles and genuine bonds that true power can be achieved. Cooperation and selflessness and harmony are built into East Asian cultures. These concepts are antithetical to American culture.
    4
  998. 4
  999. 4
  1000. 4
  1001. 4
  1002. 4
  1003. 4
  1004. 4
  1005. 4
  1006. 4
  1007. 4
  1008. 4
  1009. 4
  1010. 4
  1011. 4
  1012. 4
  1013. 4
  1014. 4
  1015. 4
  1016. 4
  1017.  @stormsj  That's the thing that westerners are chronically ignorant or deliberately refused to understand on how China looks at the Taiwan issue. I think it's deliberate because they are terminally unable to accept that China is doing great and is innovative, creative, dynamic and powerful. So of course they are going to control information flow. If those Americans who like to denigrate, insult and look down on China will to visit Shenzhen one day, they will either be shell-shocked, or gibbering in terror. "The white man is not on the top anymore!!!" Th thing is China doesn't NEED Taiwan to keep growing and progressing. What Taiwan represent is a wound that have not been healed. It's a political issue, not an economic one. But the Chinese are in no hurry to reunify with Taiwan and they ultimately don't even need TSMC. All China really wants is peaceful reunification and they can wait 10, 20, 50, even a 100 years to do that. But everyone and their dogs in the west talk like China can never have advanced chip technology without Taiwan or the west. Taiwan is a small little province. If you really know China, then Taiwan really is more like a 2nd rate, chronically mismanaged provincial backwater. All US sanctions do is solidify China's conviction and determine, and accelerate their progress because they can centrally planned to focused on project deemed as strategically important. Now you just force China to push their best and brightest to come up with innovative solutions to solve intractable problems. And everyone who bet against China from succeeding on their national project always lose.
    4
  1018. 4
  1019. 4
  1020. 4
  1021. 4
  1022. 4
  1023. 4
  1024. 4
  1025. 4
  1026. 4
  1027. 4
  1028. 4
  1029. 4
  1030. 4
  1031. 4
  1032. 4
  1033. 4
  1034. 4
  1035. 4
  1036. 4
  1037. 4
  1038. 4
  1039. 4
  1040. 4
  1041. 4
  1042. 4
  1043. 4
  1044. 4
  1045. 4
  1046. 4
  1047. 4
  1048. 4
  1049. 4
  1050. 4
  1051. 4
  1052. 4
  1053. 4
  1054. 4
  1055. 4
  1056. 4
  1057. 4
  1058. China is already too big, too well developed, too strong to be contained and sanctioned. It has the largest industrial capacity, the biggest cohorts of college graduates of all levels in the world, an established R&D environment in every field of science and tech, and even humanities, a burgeoning economy with the largest middle income population in the world, and is the largest trading partner with most countries in the world. It cannot be contained because China is already highly integrated in the world in economy, science, diplomacy, military and is member of various large cooperatives and organizations. No matter what kind of things you deny China, they will just go around and buy it from other countries, or developed it on their own or jointly with other countries. US trying to contain China will be trying to contain an ocean when you are a lake. All China have to do is wait and not make any dumb mistakes, and given their history for the past 20-30 years, they are not likely to do so. Sooner or later, the capitalistic imperialism of the collective west, especially America is going to create a massive blowback from the rest of the world. A critical mass of discontent among the world is going to reach a boiling point as America will keep taking more and more draconian measures against any rising powers challenging its hegemony, and that critical mass is going to be backed by a weakening American empire along with the increasing power of the countries they are trying to suppress, and we are going to see the world turn against America. How it will proceed is unpredictable. Maybe a world war where the world goes to war with America and whatever allies it has left, or America collapses under its own weight. But the end result is that America will fall and loses all the privileges it currently enjoys.
    4
  1059. 4
  1060. It is not that difficult to see where the hate comes from. US politics has always been based on neoliberal ideologies, that the US government must have hegemony over the world and the corporate institutions form the backbone of US economy and power. That hegemony allows the US government, and by extension American corporations, to act with near impunity. They have done so since the end of WWII. You could say the Chinese government is doing the same thing but it is actually not that relevant. What is relevant is the thought process behind advancing and preserving American hegemony: they know if America loses that hegemony, American corporations will be relegated to second tier institutions. They will have to compete on equal grounds with the Chinese and they will not be able to enjoy the power, prestige and command over the world's economy and thus unable to exploit other countries and peoples with impunity. Losing that power, even the possibility, is driving the corporate world of America insane. That's why you see so much hostility from western media and the US government. They don't want to lose that power to exploit with impunity and they know that they themselves can be targeted fro exploitation and RETALIATION from their victims if they cannot control everything. I think most Americans can get used to a multipolar world where they are not automatically by default being catered to. But some Americans, especially conservatives and the power with wealth and power, a multipolar world is nightmarish. Imagine an American billionaire arrested in Ghana for exploiting the country and subjected to Ghanian laws, because Ghana has the economic strength to resist the US government. from China's backing. The victims of American exploitation and meddling will have the power to prosecute the Americans responsible for it, and there is nothing the US government or the west can do about it because if they tried to intervene like they did before, the collective economic and military might of the new bloc of nations lead by China will block them. That is the core of their hatred. They know a strong and an increasing influential China will deny them that power.
    4
  1061. 4
  1062. 4
  1063. 4
  1064. 4
  1065. 4
  1066. 4
  1067. 4
  1068. 4
  1069. 4
  1070. 4
  1071. 4
  1072. 4
  1073. 4
  1074. 4
  1075. 4
  1076. 4
  1077. 4
  1078. 4
  1079. 4
  1080. 4
  1081. 4
  1082. 4
  1083. 4
  1084. 4
  1085. 4
  1086. 4
  1087. 4
  1088. 4
  1089. 4
  1090. 4
  1091. 4
  1092. 4
  1093. 4
  1094. 4
  1095. 4
  1096. 4
  1097. 4
  1098. ​ @Liboch  Yes, but the fact that almost the entire world defies the US is a sight to behold. If this was 30 years ago, heck, even 20 years ago, this sight would be unthinkable. It really points to the waning power of the American empire. Singapore should take very serious note about the decline of American hegemony and its moral standing among the world and adjust our foreign policies accordingly. Depending on the US to do the right and respect another country's sovereignty as they get more and more desperate to hold onto their hegemony will be a fool's errand. Last thing is that while Singapore is very westernized, the government must take into account that even though our Muslim brothers and sisters are generally quiet and mostly respect and trust the government's direction, there is no way that behind closed doors, at the dinner table, or even at the hawker table, they are not displeased with the way the white American, mostly Evangelical Christian extremist hegemony is unaliving their brothers and sisters in Palestine. The Singapore government must be aware that Singapore's sovereignty extend to all citizens and if a large portion of the citizens are not happy with the foreign policies, then they must adjust accordingly to reflect the will of the people or else risk becoming delegitimize in the eyes of the citizens. I'm sure a lot of non-Muslim Singaporeans feel the same way about what's happening in Gaza. This is a clear and gross violation of basic human morality and it doesn't matter how much the US threatens us or how much money we make with Israeli companies or buy their military tech, it will be for naught if those deals will results in deep divisions and displeasure from the people.
    4
  1099. 4
  1100. 4
  1101. 4
  1102. 4
  1103. 4
  1104. 4
  1105. 4
  1106. 4
  1107. 4
  1108. 4
  1109. 4
  1110. Because research (ie publications and citations) becomes prestige, and prestige is one of the most important criteria when you finally have to job hunt. The difference between having a degree from an Ivy League college vs a state college is tremendous when you are looking for a job. Prestige is, as unfortunate as it is, a heuristic for hiring managers to make up their mind on the worth of your degree and thus your perceived ability when looking through hundreds of job applications. The Harvard applicants are going to go on the top of the pile, even if you had a great time at your no name state college and was taught by great teachers and have done numerous undergrad research projects, and you are a well balanced, hardworking person with interesting hobbies, wonderful personality and leadership qualities. Like it or not, Chinese students understand the practicality of having that name on their degree, which is why in order to stand out among millions of students graduating every year, they need to get into that few selected schools. Tuition costs? Quality of teaching (an unmeasurable criteria)? Student life satisfaction? Type of classes? Exposure? Nah, those are all pointless. That school name on your degree is what open doors in your life and Chinese students, and east Asian students to a certain extent understand that deeply. It's the difference between being a grunt for your life or get into the C-suite, and no one is going to wager that on frivolous criteria. It is why the world is so shitty.
    4
  1111. 4
  1112. 4
  1113. 4
  1114. 4
  1115. 4
  1116. 4
  1117. 4
  1118. 4
  1119. 4
  1120. 4
  1121. 4
  1122. 4
  1123. 4
  1124. 4
  1125. 4
  1126. 4
  1127. ​ @fdjw88  That's not as fool proof as you want to believe. Yes, a lot of those debts are owe within America and a large portion is owe to other government apparatus. But no matter who hold the debts, they still have to be repaid with interests when they matured. You can certainly print money to inflate it away but that inflation also means the actual value of the interest that the American people are trying to make from lending the money is also gone. Which means in the end, no new capital is really generated, and the American people are left to prop up the inflation. Ultimately, you can't escape the fact that debts that are not backed by real things like commodities and produced value are not real. You print money, you inflate it, you are just passing the burden to the creditor and if the creditors are American people themselves, you are just destroying their capital and the American people get poorer holding onto American debt. Somewhere, some time, someone will left holding the bag. This will just make life even harder for the American people because the value they produced and invested in their own government's debts are diluted away, stolen by corporations (mostly non-productive industries like MIC and healthcare) which benefited from charging high prices for their goods and services on the government that took on these debts in the first place. This is the kind of thinking that convinced me that America is on the decline and it won't bounced back because the Americans themselves do not understand or refuse to understand the hole they are digging themselves into. In the end, you don't deserve the standard of living that you enjoy because you don't produced enough useful stuff to justify it. Eventually, you will have to pay for it, probably with generations of stagflation and social chaos and exploitation by your own oligarchs. It will be sad, but it will just poetically just.
    4
  1128. 4
  1129. 4
  1130. 4
  1131. 4
  1132. 4
  1133. 4
  1134. 4
  1135. 4
  1136. 4
  1137. 4
  1138. 4
  1139. 4
  1140. 4
  1141. 4
  1142. 4
  1143. 4
  1144. 4
  1145. 4
  1146. 4
  1147. 4
  1148. 4
  1149. 4
  1150. 4
  1151. 4
  1152. Calling the post WWII an age of compassion is so Americo-Eurocentric. Post WWII world was not very compassionate to South America, Africa, and Asia. They continue to suffer under European colonization, and then dismantling of the old colonialism and then being driven into neocolonialism of IMF, World, the USD dominance, CIA destabilization, regime change, color revolutions and deliberate suppression of development for the Global Majority. This Age of "Aggression" is just the late stage capitalism's inherent contradictions coming to a boil and we are no longer able to ignore it. Add to the fact that the rise of the Global Majority, especially China, the resurgence of Russia, the growing independence of the colonized and suppressed countries like the BRICS, and other nations, the contradictions are becoming sharper and sharper with each passing year. Age of indifference? That's just the next step of globalized capitalism moving into the rent-seeking, harvesting mode. The western liberal capitalist oligarchs are panicking as they scramble to decide whether to keep trying to suppress the Global Majority or join them. Uplifting 800 over millions people out of poverty, creating policies that are people-centric, based on common prosperity and then connecting the world in a vast trade network so the world can be lifted by a rising tide, the age of compassion did not end in the west. It shifted to China. Everything that is happening in the west today is predicted by Marx, Engels, Lenin, Mao and other Marxist thinkers. The fact that almost all westerners, even intellectuals like Dr. Murphy cannot see it is exactly why they keep getting it wrong in the 21st century and why the west is in terminal decline.
    4
  1153. 4
  1154. 4
  1155. 4
  1156. 4
  1157. 4
  1158. 4
  1159. 4
  1160. 4
  1161. 4
  1162. 4
  1163. 4
  1164. 4
  1165. 4
  1166. 4
  1167. 4
  1168. 4
  1169. 4
  1170. 3
  1171. 3
  1172. 3
  1173. 3
  1174. 3
  1175. 3
  1176. 3
  1177. 3
  1178. 3
  1179. 3
  1180. 3
  1181. 3
  1182. 3
  1183. 3
  1184. 3
  1185. 3
  1186. 3
  1187. 3
  1188. 3
  1189. 3
  1190. 3
  1191. 3
  1192. President Xi does not need to be on his best behavior because China has shown unparalleled restraint, discipline and grace in the face of US provocation and acts of war. The one that needs to be taught a lesson is the US. And the rest of the world recognized that there is only 1 China and it is the People's Republic of China and the island province of Taiwan is part of the People's Republic of China. Any lesser country would have gone to war with the US. As much neutral as Mr. Freeman wants to be, he is still trying to act like China is just as bad as the US. There is no wolf warrior policy, it is China asserting its rightful place as a great power on the world's stage. This kind of mentality just shows everyone that the west is not serious about sharing the world, is not serious about diplomacy and is not serious about adapting to a multipolar world. They still think they are the ones who are more right than everyone, when the fact is that the west is the side that have caused most of the problems, death and destruction on non-western Global Majority. This shows those of us living outside the west that the only way for the west to finally STFU and actually be humble and conciliatory and be a normal part of the world is to completely crush them in all aspects. Full spectrum domination on the west from the Global Majority. Force their own medicine down their throats for 3 generations and re-vamp their educational system to educate their latter generation of the truths of western crimes against humanity and dismantle their corpo-state media.
    3
  1193. 3
  1194. 3
  1195. 3
  1196. The WESTERNERS are surprised, not all of us. We who live outside the western corpo-state media bubble always know China cannot be underestimated and a domestic 7nm node is just a matter of time and probably sooner than we expect. Tge WESTERNERS and their media are the ones who is tooting their own horns saying that the sanctions have destroy China's high tech industry and the Chinese are all sheepie and and stupid and only know how to steal tech and never able to create anything new or innovate and all slaves the seeseepee and Chairman Xi and they eat babies or something. Sure, western industry insiders know better but they are not the ones controlling the media or trying to get reelected in the midst of a global recession and a war. So yea, we are not surprised at all. Maybe a little at how fast they got here. Remember that 3 years ago when Huawei got sanctioned and China lost access to the most cutting edge lithography machines, we all thought that they are at least 10-15, maybe even 20 years behind. And now they are merely 5 years behind the most cutting edge node. Every time the west tried to cut off China from something, everyone predicts they will be generations, decades behind. Then, they launch their own rockets, then their own heavy lift and now they have their own space station. 20 years ago, everyone think China's domestic jet engine industry is 40 years behind the west, then they shrink that to 20 within a decade, then to just one generation within another 10 years. Now they have the WS-15 that can allow the J-20 to supercruise and is only is behind western engines in lifespan. People who bet against China always lose.
    3
  1197. 3
  1198. 3
  1199. 3
  1200. 3
  1201. 3
  1202. 3
  1203. 3
  1204. 3
  1205. 3
  1206. 3
  1207. 3
  1208. The west, as usual, will cherry pick data points for their own narratives. They keep saying China is going to collapse, and that China's population is declining will also lead to its collapse. But they deliberately ignore graphs like this that show that the real estate is being deliberately imploded to make way for high tech, high value and sustainable industries like semiconductors, renewable and nuclear energy, EVs, etc. They also deliberately ignore the fact that China is adopting automation robotics at a ferverish pace, and investing heavily in robotics (another high value industry) that is now bearing fruit. Not to mention they are investing in the tool making industries like lithography, solar and wind power tools, 4th gen nuclear power designs, batteries maunfacturing, hydrogen generation, etc. This is the superiority of a system where the government can control the capital and have the power to do centralized planning for years, to move them where the country needs it the most, and to develop industries where they will never be developed if left to private sector to do so. This is how the government can create a dynamic economy and crush any rent-seeking behavior that takes value and capital out of the productive sectors and hoard by capitalists. This is how they break the cycle of boom and bust by de-leveraging and reduce capacity where it is over-built and reinvest that capital and capacity elsewhere before a bubble pop by itself and hurting millions of people. Capitalism cannot accomplish this, it has to "self-correct" during a bust cycle, destroying lives while the rich get richer and then repeat itself again.
    3
  1209. 3
  1210. 3
  1211. 3
  1212. 3
  1213. 3
  1214. 3
  1215. 3
  1216. 3
  1217. 3
  1218. 3
  1219. 3
  1220. 3
  1221. 3
  1222. 3
  1223. 3
  1224. 3
  1225. 3
  1226. 3
  1227. 3
  1228. 3
  1229. 3
  1230. 3
  1231. 3
  1232. 3
  1233. 3
  1234. 3
  1235. 3
  1236. 3
  1237. 3
  1238. 3
  1239. 3
  1240. 3
  1241. 3
  1242. 3
  1243. 3
  1244. 3
  1245. 3
  1246. 3
  1247. 3
  1248. 3
  1249. Err... no one is an ally with the US except the phillppineess and we all know that's because bong bong is a US puppet. China is not aggressive. They make claims now that they can back it up because back then they were not a naval power since the fall of Qing dynasty. They have historical claims there because China always had a presence in the SCS. Every country will make claims on any piece of land that they can. You can either go to war or negotiate. Since the signing of the Indonesia's initiative last year, China and every SE Asian country now has a framework for bilateral negotiations to settle any claims and dispute in the SCS. All except bong bong because the US is telling bong bong to choose hostility. When everyone is able to do something peacefully and you are the odd one out, then the problem lies with the phillioppiness and the US, not with China or the rest of SE Asia. No one in SE Asia wants a SE Asia NATO because no one wants bloc politics and ideological divides to create unnecessary tension and China respect that. The only ones who is not respecting SE Asia's sovereignty to want peace is the US and the west who are trying to start wars and conflicts in this region so everyone goes down with China. We know what the US is trying to pull, and so does China. So no, there won't be a SE Asia NATO, they won't be a SE Asia bloc that will be hostile to China because China gives us no reason to. Everything you have heard about how China is aggressive and SE Asia is worried are literal lies and misinformation because I live here and no one wants war. No one think China is being aggressive. Everyone knows their roles and place. If SE Asia nations truly think China is a threat, then the Quad and AUKUS won't just include the Us, UK, Aust and India. It would have include SE Asian countries because we would have requested to join. But we didn't, and that should already tell you that SE Asia countries have a neutral or friendly relationship with China. No one here really wants to join your little bully club.
    3
  1250. 3
  1251. 3
  1252. 3
  1253. 3
  1254. 3
  1255. 3
  1256. 3
  1257. 3
  1258. 3
  1259. 3
  1260. 3
  1261. 3
  1262. 3
  1263. 3
  1264. 3
  1265. 3
  1266. 3
  1267. 3
  1268. 3
  1269. 3
  1270. 3
  1271. 3
  1272. 3
  1273. 3
  1274. 3
  1275. 3
  1276. 3
  1277. 3
  1278. 3
  1279. 3
  1280. 3
  1281. 3
  1282. 3
  1283. 3
  1284. 3
  1285. 3
  1286. 3
  1287. 3
  1288. 3
  1289. 3
  1290. 3
  1291. 3
  1292. 3
  1293. 3
  1294. 3
  1295. 3
  1296. 3
  1297. 3
  1298. 3
  1299. 3
  1300. 3
  1301. 3
  1302. 3
  1303. 3
  1304. 3
  1305. 3
  1306. 3
  1307. 3
  1308. 3
  1309. 3
  1310. 3
  1311. 3
  1312. 3
  1313. 3
  1314. 3
  1315. 3
  1316. 3
  1317. 3
  1318. 3
  1319. 3
  1320. 3
  1321. 3
  1322. 3
  1323. 3
  1324. 3
  1325. 3
  1326. 3
  1327. 3
  1328. 3
  1329. 3
  1330. 3
  1331. 3
  1332. 3
  1333. And China learnt that lesson. Like in War Games, the only way to win is not to play this sick game. No one wants a new Cold War but we can all see, even the Europeans can see that America is the one trying to start one. What China is going to do from all these messaging, is that they acknowledge that the US is coming for them, so they will no longer ONLY seek diplomatic resolutions, but will also use harder techniques. But they will also not get drawn into a debilitating Cold War, so they will continue to be open and build deeper diplomatic ties with other countries, even the Europeans. The only way to win a Cold War is to not get suck into it like what the Soviets did and keep building ties and blocs with everyone everywhere. America might be able to contain China if China retreats completely and become isolationist. But it cannot contain the entire world. China now is the number one trading partner with nearly every country in the world and its economy can only keep becoming more and more developed, its cultural influence spread further and its diplomatic ties deeper. On the other hand, America is in constant political chaos and social dysfunctionality and its economy is built on a house of cards. Somewhere along the line, something gonna give, a pillar is going to collapse and America will find itself more and more isolated as it start to lose friends left and right. This time around, America might just find itself surrounded by unfriendly people because more and more countries are getting fed up with their foreign policies and past crimes.
    3
  1334. 3
  1335. This is why the US want to amend the non-weaponization of space to specifically said no WMDs. This implicitly means that OTHER weapons are fair game, as long as they are not nukes. US launching anti-satellites satellites, perhaps armed with space launching conventional warhead missiles can thus target other countries' satellites, like the ones mentioned here. Of course, the US is free to copy Chinese electronic warfare satellites and the same kind of ki__-chain system, IF they have a working anti-ship hypersonic missile that can match China's ones. It is perhaps poetic justice because back in the late 90s, the US sent EW planes to fly up and down China's coastlines to spoof China's radars, giving them false signals and making the Chinese believe they are under a massive attack. It caused the PLA to scramble hundreds of jets to intercept these incoming jets only to find out they are "ghosts". It was the US way of humiliating the Chinese and to tell them that they can't match US technologies and tactics. After that, the Chinese became adamant at fast tracking their technological advancement in military and especially in Electronic Warfare. That was the era of China's rapid expansion of its military and going through reforms and doing lots of experiments - like that whole series of destroyers before they settled on Tuye 052 series and 055. Now the table has turned and the PLA has some of the most formidable EW suites for both defense and offense, and they are putting EW even on satellites. It might come one day, that it is the US military getting their radar spoof and they have to scramble their jets only to find out the Chinese have fooled them..
    3
  1336. 3
  1337. 3
  1338. 3
  1339. 3
  1340. 3
  1341. 3
  1342. 3
  1343. 3
  1344. 3
  1345. 3
  1346. 3
  1347. 3
  1348. 3
  1349. 3
  1350. 3
  1351. 3
  1352. 3
  1353. 3
  1354. 3
  1355. 3
  1356. 3
  1357. 3
  1358. 3
  1359. 3
  1360. 3
  1361. 3
  1362. 3
  1363. 3
  1364. 3
  1365. 3
  1366. 3
  1367. Let's be honest. Who exactly are we invading using this? It maybe true that a single gigantic plane might improve strategic logistic by making fewer trips and higher throughput per trip. the question really isn't that the army needs such a lifter. The question is whether the army can get where it needs to go at the right amount of time. C-5s and C-17s can already transport the largest possible type of cargo like MBTs. They just need to do it more times, and they can do it likely with more redundancy and better surviability and land at rough airstrips. The Pelican will likely require immensely long and well-built runways so unless the army or marines can capture airports at the beginning of an invasion, it might not be usable. Such a project will not give the military or even civilian users meaningful increase in capability, on top of the likely enormous costs. If speed and throughput is really the problem, the AF and army might as well as just order more C-5s or C-17s. Heck, if they really want to, they can lengthen the C-5s, change to more powerful engines and restart production and now you have a lifter that can transport even more tanks at one go. For civilian side, will it be able to reduce the cost per ton per mile compared to current jets in the fleets? Probably not. There is a reason why we never found a need for more than one An-225. Whoever in the army came up with the requirements in the first did not really think their way through. This is a solution looking for a problem to solve and that is never a good start to any project.
    3
  1368. 3
  1369. 3
  1370. 3
  1371. 3
  1372. 3
  1373. 3
  1374. 3
  1375. 3
  1376. 3
  1377. 3
  1378. 3
  1379. 3
  1380. 3
  1381. 3
  1382. 3
  1383. 3
  1384. 3
  1385. 3
  1386. 3
  1387. 3
  1388. 3
  1389. 3
  1390. 3
  1391. 3
  1392. 3
  1393. 3
  1394. 3
  1395. 3
  1396. 3
  1397. 3
  1398. 3
  1399. 3
  1400. 3
  1401. 3
  1402. 3
  1403. 3
  1404. 3
  1405. 3
  1406. 3
  1407. 3
  1408. 3
  1409. 3
  1410. 3
  1411. 3
  1412. 3
  1413. 3
  1414. 3
  1415. 3
  1416. 3
  1417. 3
  1418. 3
  1419. 3
  1420. 3
  1421. 3
  1422. 3
  1423. 3
  1424. 3
  1425. 3
  1426. 3
  1427. 3
  1428. 3
  1429. 3
  1430. 3
  1431. 3
  1432. 3
  1433. 3
  1434. 3
  1435. 3
  1436. 3
  1437. 3
  1438. 3
  1439. 3
  1440. 3
  1441. 3
  1442. 3
  1443. 3
  1444. 3
  1445. 3
  1446. 3
  1447. 3
  1448. 3
  1449. 3
  1450. 3
  1451. 3
  1452. 3
  1453. 3
  1454. 3
  1455. 3
  1456. 3
  1457. 3
  1458. 3
  1459. 3
  1460. 3
  1461. 3
  1462. 3
  1463. 3
  1464. 3
  1465. 3
  1466. 3
  1467. 3
  1468. 3
  1469. 3
  1470. 3
  1471. 3
  1472. 3
  1473. 3
  1474. 3
  1475. 3
  1476. 3
  1477. 3
  1478. 3
  1479. 3
  1480. 3
  1481. 3
  1482. 3
  1483. 3
  1484. 3
  1485. 3
  1486. 3
  1487. 3
  1488. 3
  1489. 3
  1490. 3
  1491. 3
  1492. 3
  1493. 3
  1494. 3
  1495. 3
  1496. 3
  1497. 3
  1498. 3
  1499. 3
  1500. 3
  1501. 3
  1502. 3
  1503. 3
  1504. 3
  1505. 3
  1506. 3
  1507. 3
  1508. 3
  1509. 3
  1510. 3
  1511. 3
  1512. 3
  1513. 3
  1514. 3
  1515. 3
  1516. 3
  1517. 3
  1518. 3
  1519. 3
  1520. 3
  1521. 3
  1522. 3
  1523. 3
  1524. 3
  1525. 3
  1526. 3
  1527. 3
  1528. Agreed. From what the video said, the Chinese scientists used a combination of software and hardware tricks to improve signal to noise ratio of their detection. It seems like what they are doing is to use multiple radars and very fast switching of pulses, maybe even multiple bands, to hit a stealth aircraft from multiple angles, then use sophisticated software to stitch together all the information into a coherent picture. It is clever no doubt and will likely work if the radars sites are positioned well, meaning they can effectively defend a huge area. They might not be able to defend all areas, but definitely the most important sites. The system only need a general outline of the F-22 or F-35 and its speed, altitude and heading to launch interceptors whether they are SAMs or AAMs. Once the interceptors get near the aircraft, probably with mid-course correction too, it can turn on its own active searcher whether it is its own radar, or IR or even both. Within a short enough distance, no stealth can defeat an active AESA radar even if it has a small radar head. Then it becomes a numbers game. To penetrate this area, you probably will have to launch more than just 1 squadron of stealth jets and more than likely, some of them won't make it home. No longer can the US military penetrate Chinese airspace above important sites with impunity and that will put a dampen on any attempts at belligerency from the US. If the US is really d*mb enough to go hot with China, barring a nuclear exchange, there won't be a lot of F-22s or F-35s left in the initial salvos, much less the 4th gen fighters. Can the US afford this? Can the US even build and train replacements fast enough? I doubt it. Then the deterrence has worked.
    3
  1529. 3
  1530. 3
  1531. 3
  1532. 3
  1533. 3
  1534. 3
  1535. 3
  1536. 3
  1537. 3
  1538. 3
  1539. 3
  1540. 3
  1541. 3
  1542. 3
  1543. 3
  1544. 3
  1545. 3
  1546. 3
  1547. Any discussion about the USD system must include how the USD is recycled back to the US as US treasuries and bonds. This is how the US steal every other country's surplus production. Every time you import something to the US, they exchange it with their paper fiat money that they can print out of thin air. Then you have very few choices about what to do with the USD you now have. You can use it to buy other things or you use it to buy US debts to ensure its value is not devalued by inflation. But now you are fully subjected to US monetary policies. If they want to inflate their debts away, they print money and your bond or T-bills can become worth less than before. There are many levers they are pull to screw any central bank holding USD but the main points are that the US exchange real goods/services for fiat money, and that your value you earned with your labor, your resources is locked into US financial system and you are subjected to their whims and their interests which often do not aligned with yours. Just look at Russian assets being frozen and properly will be stolen by the west. Everything about the USD system is immoral and reduce your country's sovereignty. We use USD because we had no choice, the entire world was trapped in this system. The US has also proven for many years that they are very irresponsible with the way they steward the USD when treasury secretary John Connally saying to the European finance ministers that "the dollar is our currency, but it’s your problem." Now, we have alternatives which ironically Russia has shown is possible to choose. It's an extreme example of de-dollarization but we all don't need to de-dollarize to this extent, we just have to diversify away form using USD for trade. There is an inflection point where the demand of the USD dropped to the point that the selling of debts require higher interest rate to attract buyers to the point the government cannot service this debt anymore. Then, the whole house of cards is gonna come crashing down. Don't forget that a large part of the US military's budget comes from this incessant borrowing and it is now going even higher. It is the US military might that is now enforcing the rules of using the USD for trade and even now they are losing that effectiveness because the UKraine war is not going well for the west and there is no way they can invade and regime change China. In the past, they can show up on your doorstep, accuse you of being anti-democratic and against "rule based order" (whatever that mean) and regime-change you. Now they can't do it to the most powerful countries like China, Russia and even India and they are all moving towards de-dollarization. None of the old underhanded tactics worked anymore but they keep doing it. It is a matter of time when the BRICS figured out a system that is equitable to all sides for trade and then offer that real alternative to the world. With the BRICS controlling both the supply (minerals, energy, agriculture) and demand (huge huge markets), they literally can create an alternative market, system that do not require the west at all. At all.
    3
  1548. 3
  1549. 3
  1550. 3
  1551. 3
  1552. 3
  1553. 3
  1554. 3
  1555. 3
  1556. 3
  1557. 3
  1558. 3
  1559. 3
  1560. 3
  1561. 3
  1562. 3
  1563. 3
  1564. 3
  1565. 3
  1566. 3
  1567. 3
  1568. 3
  1569. 3
  1570. 3
  1571. 3
  1572. 3
  1573. 3
  1574. 3
  1575. 3
  1576. 3
  1577. 3
  1578. 3
  1579. 3
  1580. 3
  1581. 3
  1582. 3
  1583. 3
  1584. 3
  1585. 3
  1586. 3
  1587. 3
  1588. 3
  1589. 3
  1590. 3
  1591. 3
  1592. 3
  1593. 3
  1594. 3
  1595. 3
  1596. 3
  1597. 3
  1598. 3
  1599. 3
  1600. 3
  1601. 3
  1602. The way I see it is that the US is the most carbon emitting country in history with the Europeans a close 2nd. That historical carbon emission is why we are having climate change, not just the current emission. Climate change has been making these wild fires in recent years more and more insane. This is well known by now. Yet, the US are woefully prepared for such a disaster and in fact has been cutting corners on their firefighting capability. So when the perfect wild fire strike, fueled by climate change of America's doing, coupled with inadequate firefighting capabilities and short-sighted policies and the cultural and economical cheapness of using wood as building materials, all come together to give the US the karma slap of the decade. This is in stark contrast to the Chongqing fire just 2 years ago where China mobilize huge amount of resources and the people coming together to literally, physically made firebreaks that stop the fires from reaching the city. Even more relevant is the earthquake in Xizhang that happened almost the same time as the LA fire, and we saw Chinese mobilize their disaster management immediately, reaching the disaster area within hours, and supplies poured in within 24 hours. Tents, firefighting, doctors, medical supplies, heating, all poured into a region thousands of feet above sea level. It's hilarious too in the background of tiktok getting banned and Americans migrating to Rednote, an even more Chinese social media app and finding out that the Chinese people are nice, welcoming and funny. Even worse, they are finding out that the Chinese don't live in an authoritarian hellscape but instead enjoy affordable healthcare, groceries, world class transportation and safety unheard of in the US. People are posting angry and sad videos on the soon to be banned tiktok and on Rednote, saying how they have been lied to all their lives. Good luck America, y'all need a revolution.
    3
  1603. 3
  1604. 3
  1605. 3
  1606. 3
  1607. 3
  1608. 2
  1609. 2
  1610. 2
  1611. 2
  1612. 2
  1613. 2
  1614. 2
  1615. 2
  1616. 2
  1617. 2
  1618. 2
  1619. 2
  1620. 2
  1621. 2
  1622. 2
  1623. 2
  1624. 2
  1625. 2
  1626. 2
  1627. 2
  1628. 2
  1629. 2
  1630. 2
  1631. 2
  1632. 2
  1633. 2
  1634. 2
  1635. 2
  1636. 2
  1637. 2
  1638. 2
  1639. 2
  1640. 2
  1641. 2
  1642. 2
  1643. 2
  1644. 2
  1645. 2
  1646. 2
  1647. 2
  1648. 2
  1649. 2
  1650. 2
  1651. 2
  1652. 2
  1653. 2
  1654. 2
  1655. 2
  1656. 2
  1657. 2
  1658. 2
  1659. 2
  1660. 2
  1661. 2
  1662. 2
  1663. 2
  1664. 2
  1665. 2
  1666. 2
  1667. 2
  1668. 2
  1669. 2
  1670. 2
  1671. 2
  1672. 2
  1673. 2
  1674. 2
  1675. 2
  1676. 2
  1677. 2
  1678. 2
  1679. 2
  1680. 2
  1681. 2
  1682. 2
  1683. 2
  1684. 2
  1685. 2
  1686. 2
  1687. 2
  1688. 2
  1689. 2
  1690. 2
  1691. 2
  1692. 2
  1693. 2
  1694. 2
  1695. 2
  1696. 2
  1697. 2
  1698. 2
  1699. 2
  1700. 2
  1701. 2
  1702. 2
  1703. 2
  1704. 2
  1705. 2
  1706. 2
  1707. 2
  1708. 2
  1709. 2
  1710. 2
  1711. 2
  1712. 2
  1713. 2
  1714. 2
  1715. 2
  1716. 2
  1717. I think the 2nd phase will never come and should not come, given that the CPC has proven beyond any shadow of doubt that their system, Socialism with Chinese Characteristics has deliver prosperity, strength and rejuvenation of the Chinese civilization beyond anything the previous dynasties has ever achieved. Over 800 million lifted out of poverty and the elimination of absolute poverty, the urbanization and industrialization on the humongous scale that China now produce over 30% of all value in manufacturing, the housing of hundreds of millions, world class infrastructure the most amount of electricity produced ever, the greening of deserts, the taming of the Yellow River, laying down over 50,000 km of high speed rails, leading today up almost all the critical technologies and scientific output, increasing the life expectancy above the US, all because the CPC won the civil war. There is no way the mainland Chinese will accept the ROC form of government where the politicians are literally descended from Japanese collaborators and they are throwing chairs at each other in parliament. There is no way Taiwan can gain independence today, even if they are willing to go to war. There is no way mainland Chinese will accept Taiwan's independence even if they had to take the island province back by force (they will rather really really not to do so). There is also no way the US (or any European power) will survive a direct kinetic confrontation with China in West Pacific or the economic devastation, and there is no way Japan will throw its own people into the seas to help Taiwan. There is no way any SE Asian countries will participate in that mess. Also, the PRC is a democracy, so this whole wanting to turn China into a democracy is moot.
    2
  1718. 2
  1719. 2
  1720. 2
  1721. 2
  1722. 2
  1723. 2
  1724. 2
  1725. 2
  1726. 2
  1727. 2
  1728. 2
  1729. 2
  1730. 2
  1731. 2
  1732. 2
  1733. 2
  1734. 2
  1735. 2
  1736. 2
  1737. 2
  1738. 2
  1739. 2
  1740. 2
  1741. 2
  1742. 2
  1743. 2
  1744. 2
  1745. 2
  1746. 2
  1747. 2
  1748. 2
  1749. 2
  1750. 2
  1751. 2
  1752. 2
  1753. 2
  1754. 2
  1755. 2
  1756. 2
  1757. 2
  1758. 2
  1759. 2
  1760. 2
  1761. 2
  1762. 2
  1763. 2
  1764. 2
  1765. 2
  1766. 2
  1767. Exactly. Russia is also entitled to their national security. If the west refuses to even acknowledge that Russia's security is a legitimate concern, then Russia do not have to acknowledge western expansion right to their doorsteps. The west need to back the f*ck down and stop thinking that their way is the most right, most moral and thus must be imposed on everyone. It is not the most right, not the most moral nor even the most honorable. Stop this pretension that it is about freedom and democracy because western interventions and expansion of their influence on other countries have rarely resulted in real freedom or democracy. It will even be farcical to say the west stands for freedom and democracy when their system is obviously capitalist hegemony. The freedom and democracy are window dressing meant to placate their population. When push comes to shove, the capitalists always has the last say in any western country's policies and laws. That is not freedom or democracy. We also need to stop this nonsense of framing this war as legitimate fight against tyranny. Russia's security concerns are legitimate, and should be respected. The west is not free or democratic and their interventions are seldom for freedom and democracy. They have no moral high ground to present themselves as such. The Ukraine war is started by the west when they disrespected Russia's security concern. It is a proxy war for western, especially American domination over Russia and is not fought for freedom and democracy. Whether Russia is winning or losing this war does not dispel that the west has acted in bad faith and not for the interests of the Ukrainian people. The question will not end with the Ukraine war because so long the west and America especially, thinks it is some sort of divine right for them to impose their world order on everyone and disrespect other countries' positions and seek to dominate the rest of the world, there will be another proxy war like this one. If and when the Americans start a war over Taiwan, and rope the Europeans into it and if the Europeans really followed meekly behind their masters, they will be in for a nasty surprise. If the west really push China into a war, and China finally stop restraining itself, the people of the west will be punished for their transgressions. And the rest of the world will watch.
    2
  1768. 2
  1769. 2
  1770. 2
  1771. 2
  1772. 2
  1773. 2
  1774. 2
  1775. 2
  1776. 2
  1777. 2
  1778. 2
  1779. 2
  1780. 2
  1781. I will take these reports with a huge grain of salt. Until the PLA actually announces the existence of these weapons and that they are deployed, which means it work, I wouldn't put much stock in it. Everything else is speculation and has some agenda to them. Either these are trying to fearmonger to get more funding for the MIC or just being click baity articles. But the DF-21 and DF-ZF are real. DF-27 is still mired in mystery so everything about it is still speculative. Hypersonics are important but using them to hit a carrier is still no easy task. The most important point is that the possibility of hitting a carrier with ballistic and hypersonic is now very real because the entire kill-chain (detection -> target -> launch -> guide -> hit) set up by China is very real. That mean the USN cannot operate with impunity even within the second island chain anymore because they have to make the calculations that under certain conditions, the carrier might be very vulnerable. In the past, the USN did not have to make such calculations but now they are forced to. That's the real game changer. But I will argue there is an even more important point. That is the Chinese strategists at PLA are already thinking beyond what the west has been doing. They are crafting new doctrines, new strategies and new tactics. They are now the ones who is shaping the future of warfare, not chasing after established western doctrines anymore. That's why we are seeing more and more weird and crazy ideas coming out of China in terms of future warfare because they are also now in untested territories. Shaping the future is no longer monopolized by the west and that's not just in the warfare. China has become the global taste maker, the global mover in all the most important parts of our lives, and it is driving the west crazy.
    2
  1782. That's the problem with western corpo-state media. They put out these unrealistic dumb stuff for propaganda so much that people there no longer have any idea how this stuff actually works. Russia has one of the largest air forces in the world and also some of the most sophisticated integrated air defenses. To beat that, you will probably need hundreds if not thousands of fighters and/or bombers to sweep the battlefields, and be prepared to lose a lot of them to attrition. With the way Russian defenses are set up, you will need thousands of missiles, probably millions of tons of bombs to crack, along with hundreds of thousands of infrantrymen, supported by thousands of IFVs and hundreds of tanks to really attack effectively. Whatever the west sent to Ukraine is a fraction of a fraction of what they will need to attack these defensive lines. Ukraine does not have the manpower even if they draft every able bodied male into the war. Even then, these kind of preparations will take months, if not years to finish. There is just no way Ukraine can do this realistically after the initial battles have nearly clean out their military and equipment. There is no way these things can be replenished in weeks or months, and no way the west will commit all their assets to Ukraine. It took them years, decades to accumulate these military equipment. The counter-offensive is a fool's errand because Ukraine has driven itself into a corner politically, diplomatically by aligning with NATO and letting the US used it as a sacrificial pawn against Russia. Now it cannot negotiate with Russia for a conditioned armistice because it no longer has any control over its own politics anymore. The best strategy for Ukraine was never, ever get into the situation where Russia feels it has to do something drastic to protect its national security interests in the very first place. Now he is going around Europe begging for scraps. I mean approaching the Swedish for Gripens is just getting sad.
    2
  1783. 2
  1784. 2
  1785. 2
  1786. 2
  1787. 2
  1788. 2
  1789. 2
  1790. 2
  1791. 2
  1792. 2
  1793. 2
  1794. 2
  1795. 2
  1796. 2
  1797. 2
  1798. 2
  1799. 2
  1800. 2
  1801. 2
  1802. 2
  1803. I think there should be a new way to measure democracy: the relative distance between a de jure democracy and a de facto democracy. De jure is that on paper and procedural, a country can be democratic, but if it is not measure with de facto democracy. De facto democracy will measure: 1. the policies that people desire gets enacted vs. policies they don't want or don't care for, will indicate power distribution among the population 2. wealth inequality that indicate how wealth is concentrated, 3. poverty level indicates how fair the overall system is able to redistribute wealth and give prosperity to all, 4. combined 2 and 3 will give us measurement of the utilitarian level of the policies that helps distribution of wealth 5. achieving basic living standards: including true access to education, housing, jobs, savings and retirement, healthcare etc., 6. labor union power measured against corporate power, pervasiveness of unions and whether unions have enough power for negotations 7. imperialistic tendencies of the countries' foreign policies 8. media independence from powerful influences including government and corporations, to examine the level of propaganda that skewed toward powerful elites, both state and private. 9. measurement of the citizens' information bubble derived from covert and overt propaganda and indoctrination - true measurement of freedom of thought If you start measuring democracy in the de facto manner, I will bet a lot of money that the US will drop in democracy ranking tremendously. The current way these metrics are measured is absurdly skewed toward de jure democracy that serves to put western countries on a higher moral pedestal that they do not deserve and these fake moral high grounds are weaponized for diplomatic imperialism from the west. Also, take note that non of the defactor democracy measurements are measuring concepts and system implementation. The results are what matters, and it doesn't really matter what system you used to achieve democratic results - ie. policies and results that benefit the most people possible and keep abuses from the wealthy and political elite low. We will have classification like True Democracy (maybe some Scandinavian countries will qualified) where both the de jure and de facto measurements are high; Superficial Democracy (US, UK and probably most of western Europe, even India) where de jure is high but de facto is low; Practiced Democracy (China, Singapore and some other prosperous countries with stronger dejure authoritarianism) where the de jure is low but de facto is high, and Undemocratic (usually failed states) where de jure is low and de facto is low.
    2
  1804. The problem with the western (or really it is America) worldview is still trying to contain China and preserve its hegemony. A very simple question: whose hegemony? Is it the hegemony of the people of the west? Or is it really about the hegemony of the capital ruling class and their political lackeys? Why does every question has to asked in the terms of China being the threat? Threat to who, really? China is not interested in regime changes, it is not interested in exporting its model and forcing it down your throats. They are not going to meddle in your elections, they are not going to come and demand that your country form a German Communist Party, or a Polish Communist Party, or a French Communist Party. They don't care. It is only interested in its own economic rise and strength so the last two hundreds years of suffering and humiliation will not happen again. You are now dealing with a political elite that consist of highly rational, consistent, extremely intelligent statesmen. They are not stupid asses like ted cruz or MTG. If you work with China, they are more than happy to work with you because they will always want to seek a win-win situation. But if you keep thinking that China is a threat and must be contained, then that is no more than the same colonial mindset that demands that only the west must remain on top. The hypocrisy and double standards applied to China are shameful, if the west can even feel shame. China's rise is inevitable and guaranteed at this point. The only question the western world has to ask themselves: are they going to go off the cliff with America to protect American interests, or are they going to finally f*cking grow a spine and adapt to a multipolar world where the center will be in Asia.
    2
  1805. 2
  1806. 2
  1807. 2
  1808. 2
  1809. 2
  1810. 2
  1811. 2
  1812. 2
  1813. 2
  1814. 2
  1815. 2
  1816. 2
  1817. 2
  1818. 2
  1819. 2
  1820. 2
  1821. 2
  1822. 2
  1823. 2
  1824. 2
  1825. 2
  1826. 2
  1827. 2
  1828. 2
  1829. 2
  1830. 2
  1831. 2
  1832. 2
  1833. 2
  1834. 2
  1835. 2
  1836. 2
  1837. 2
  1838. 2
  1839. 2
  1840. 2
  1841. 2
  1842. 2
  1843. 2
  1844. ​ @_Urahara_Kisuke_  Indeed. LKY was one of those rare individuals who was a true leader. Those who followed him into his government and built this country were themselves highly intelligent and ambitious. But they followed him willingly even when they disagreed with him vehemently because he was able to convince them of his vision, of his leadership and of his passion. He was not above being a passionate man, even though in many interviews he gave, he always seemed calm, collected, composed and very very sharp. But when he was on the campaign, he was fiery, he was passionate. And he convinced a country that he would everything in his power, with his life to build this country. He convinced them that he combined both intelligent, rationality and passion. I remember watching old videos of him at town hall meetings where he was on fire, he was blasting his opposition, he pointed out their inadequacies, he put forth his visions, his ideas and he punctuated his speech with fire. He was very charismatic, and empathetic. That was the time when PAP had not proven themselves to be the prudent, rational and highly intelligent and competent party. He convinced a country that was just a few years ago had violent racial riots, religious tensions that he can lead all of them fairly, equally and rationally but also with passion to common prosperity. Why should the Malays and Indians gave him their votes. He was Chinese! Worse, a twinkie Chinese (yellow on the outside, white on the inside, his mandarin and dialects were terrible) and he was able to convince those dialect groups, tribalistic Chinese to follow him. LKY was not a dictator. He earned the trust of his fellow colleagues, and he earned the trust of his countrymen and from there he proved his leadership and earned the admiration and respect from everyone. If he was a dictator, he didn't have to do any of those things. He didn't have to possess any of those traits. He didn't have to use words and the power he imbued in those words to convince people to follow him. He could have just beat up his opposition with his authority. This is why I don't care much for western opinions on other countries' leaders anymore. Their assessments are typically either ignorant, simplistic, self-serving, culturally insensitive, or done in bad faith.
    2
  1845. 2
  1846. 2
  1847. 2
  1848. 2
  1849. 2
  1850. 2
  1851. 2
  1852. 2
  1853. 2
  1854. 2
  1855. 2
  1856. 2
  1857. 2
  1858. 2
  1859. 2
  1860. 2
  1861. 2
  1862. 2
  1863. 2
  1864. 2
  1865. 2
  1866. 2
  1867. 2
  1868. 2
  1869. 2
  1870. 2
  1871. 2
  1872. Only capitalist pigs will think reckless spending and not saving for rainy days is a good thing. Chinese like saving, and that is ultimately better than spending everything. Because a spendthirft society only encourages rampant consumerism,and in turn encourages an out of control capitalist culture that place consumption above all us, creating a dysfunctional soceity that we are all seeing in America and parts of Europe right now. Consumerism has been studied for a long time in western social sciences and the conclusions reached is that such a culture alienates people, creates useless competition among the working class (keeping up with the Joneses/Kardahsians) and enervate the morality of that society. It normalizes toxic individualism and makes people think only spending money and getting material things is the path to happiness. Worse, it brings the capitalist psychopaths that manipulate the public into spending beyond their means, into power. I encourage people to read up on the life of one of the most evil persons ever created by the American capitalist culture: edward bernays. That's what America is, and China must not replicate such decadence. Revenge spending is an insane and shortsighted and destructive concept and should be vilified. Revenge spending is one of the symptom of the rot that lies at the center of American culture, the fact they can even come out with such an absurd concept. Spending to make yourself feel better is a shit concept. Savings is GOOD. Savings means redundant capacity. Saving means resilience. It is a concept that capitalists hate with a fervor because a saving society means they cannot loot that money. But a saving culture is a culture that emphasizes on moderation, on restrain, on foresight and that will translate into a culture that emphasize long term health of the society, and not short term quarterly gains. That is a society that endures, that flexes, and become stronger. And capitalists HATE that. They WANT those trillions locked up in Chinese people's bank accounts and they HATE that China's socialistic, cautious culture is too resilient to their manipulation.
    2
  1873. It should also be noted that Confucius established his philosophical baseline in an age of strife - the Spring and Autumn Period. His take on why societies and counties failed is eminently on a non-spiritual side. Other than the Mandate of Heaven, there was not much tradition of using the divine to determine why the world was this way or that way. There are no angels coming down from heaven carrying messages from god, or if Zeus felt peckish that day and decide to punish some mortals for some offenses from long ago. It was just not a big thing in China for these kind of divine intervention on that spiritual level. Instead Confucius opted to look at the human conditions more in the practical and organizational aspects. He wanted to create a foundation at how good governance can occur, ask why states failed, why people revolt, and why bureaucracies fell apart, not about pleasing gods. Pleasing gods comes later when good governance is establishment - aka having the Mandate - and not that pleasing the gods give good governance. You get the Mandate by being a good king/emperor, you don't get it by pleasing Heaven first. Good governance is pleasing to Heaven. Everything in the Analects is based on the idea that big concept on the state level - government, the bureaucracy - comes from good foundation of small concepts like the family unit - father, mother, children, uncles, cousins, neighbors, community. The concept is a vertical integration of orderliness - father takes care of family, children take care of their parent to the King takes care of the country and the peasants take care of state. If everything happens according to this moral set of values, orderliness will emerge, then everything will fall into place. Hence why there is such an emphasis on concepts like justice, filial piety, moral righteousness, education because these are what he thought forms a strong foundation to the family unit, and thus to the country unit. There is nothing remotely spiritual as in the supernatural intervention or god pleasing in this viewpoint. Even ancestor worship is a form of ritualized reinforcement of humility, that one must remember the past wisdom to govern the future. It is however very logical and very practical in its mentality, and approaches and provide one of the first complete thought processes on how a state can operate on a gigantic scale. It is probably why the Han dynasty adopted Confucianism and it became the bureaucratic foundation and thought process of China like what Christianity and the concept of sin did for the west. Creating a good, sturdy and just bureaucracy is the point. Creating order out of chaos through human agency is the point. This is a very crucial viewpoint.
    2
  1874. 2
  1875. 2
  1876. 2
  1877. 2
  1878. 2
  1879. 2
  1880. 2
  1881. 2
  1882. 2
  1883. 2
  1884. 2
  1885. 2
  1886. 2
  1887. 2
  1888. 2
  1889. 2
  1890. 2
  1891. 2
  1892. 2
  1893. 2
  1894. 2
  1895. 2
  1896. 2
  1897. 2
  1898. 2
  1899. 2
  1900. 2
  1901. 2
  1902. 2
  1903. 2
  1904. 2
  1905. 2
  1906. 2
  1907. 2
  1908. 2
  1909. 2
  1910. 2
  1911. 2
  1912. 2
  1913. 2
  1914. 2
  1915. 2
  1916. 2
  1917. 2
  1918. 2
  1919. 2
  1920. 2
  1921. 2
  1922. 2
  1923. 2
  1924. 2
  1925. 2
  1926. 2
  1927. 2
  1928. 2
  1929. 2
  1930. Err... no one is an ally with the US except the phillppineess and we all know that's because bong bong is a US puppet. China is not aggressive. They make claims now that they can back it up because back then they were not a naval power since the fall of Qing dynasty. They have historical claims there because China always had a presence in the SCS. Every country will make claims on any piece of land that they can. You can either go to war or negotiate. Since the signing of the Indonesia's initiative last year, China and every SE Asian country now has an accelerated framework for bilateral negotiations to settle any claims and dispute in the SCS. All except bong bong because the US is telling bong bong to choose hostility. When everyone is able to do something peacefully and you are the odd one out, then the problem lies with the phillioppiness and the US, not with China or the rest of SE Asia. No one in SE Asia wants a SE Asia NATO because no one wants bloc politics and ideological divides to create unnecessary tension and China respect that. The only ones who is not respecting SE Asia's sovereignty to want peace is the US and the west who are trying to start wars and conflicts in this region so everyone goes down with China. We know what the US is trying to pull, and so does China. So no, there won't be a SE Asia NATO, they won't be a SE Asia bloc that will be hostile to China because China gives us no reason to. Everything you have heard about how China is aggressive and SE Asia is worried are literal lies and misinformation because I live here and no one wants war. No one think China is being overly aggressive. Assertive? Sure. Aggressive? No. If SE Asia nations truly think China is a threat, then the Quad and AUKUS won't just include the Us, UK, Aust and India. It would have include SE Asian countries because we would have requested to join. But we didn't, and that should already tell you that SE Asia countries have a neutral or friendly relationship with China. No one here really wants to join your little club.
    2
  1931. 2
  1932. 2
  1933. 2
  1934. 2
  1935. 2
  1936. 2
  1937. 2
  1938. 2
  1939. 2
  1940. 2
  1941. 2
  1942. 2
  1943. 2
  1944. 2
  1945. 2
  1946. 2
  1947. 2
  1948. 2
  1949. 2
  1950. 2
  1951. 2
  1952. 2
  1953. 2
  1954. 2
  1955. 2
  1956. 2
  1957. 2
  1958. 2
  1959. 2
  1960. 2
  1961. 2
  1962. 2
  1963. 2
  1964. 2
  1965. 2
  1966. 2
  1967. 2
  1968. 2
  1969. 2
  1970. 2
  1971. 2
  1972. 2
  1973. 2
  1974. 2
  1975. 2
  1976. 2
  1977. 2
  1978. 2
  1979. 2
  1980. 2
  1981. 2
  1982. 2
  1983. 2
  1984. 2
  1985. 2
  1986. 2
  1987. 2
  1988. 2
  1989. 2
  1990.  @rrai1999  so you are essentially saying that China should be doom to poverty forever, because there is no practical way to industrialize and developed without some pollution. The fact is also that China is now doing most of the heavy lifting in fighting climate change, which I remind you, is primarily caused by historical emission of the US and Europe, is lost to western duplicitous double standards. They took away all the atmospheric allowance for carbon by their reckless industrialization and irresponsible emissions that continues to even today. Yet somehow, the developing world is supposed to shoulder the blame for it by remaining in destitute while receiving little to basically useless "help" from the west to modernize. So I don't care about your virtue signalling when you try to blame China for pollution when they have tried their best to fight the most debilitating scourge of the human kind, and they are also now at the forefront of fighting pollution and rejuvenating their environment that did pay the price for development. And to say that they don't care about the environment is the kind of brain numbing hypocrisy and misrepresentation of situation that makes anyone who has a shred of critical thinking and principles to doubt the moral fortitude of western culture and society. This kind of self-serving virtue signalling without considering the wider context and the bigger picture is why the Global South take the west's lectures about human rights, morality, ethics and the environment less and less seriously and looking for China for leadership. We no longer care what you have to say, because everything you have said are lies.
    2
  1991. 2
  1992. 2
  1993. 2
  1994. 2
  1995. 2
  1996. 2
  1997. 2
  1998. 2
  1999. 2
  2000. 2
  2001. 2
  2002. 2
  2003. 2
  2004. 2
  2005. 2
  2006. 2
  2007. 2
  2008. 2
  2009. 2
  2010. 2
  2011. 2
  2012. 2
  2013. 2
  2014. 2
  2015. 2
  2016. 2
  2017. 2
  2018. 2
  2019. 2
  2020. 2
  2021. 2
  2022. 2
  2023. 2
  2024. 2
  2025. He was a crook but he was not wrong. Chinese leaders care deeply about the well-being of the Chinese people and security of their country. Why shouldn't any leadership do that? That is not to say that they don't care about their Marxist-Leninist approach to economy and governance but they apply that mostly within China. Their foreign policy has always been non-interventionist because they know they can't control the world and frankly they aren't interested in it. Their attitude is if you want to be communist, well good for you and they will call your comrade. If you want to be a capitalist, well that's a shame. But as long as you are willing to trade and treat them with respect and fairness, they are wiling to work with you with respect and fairness, and they have proven it time and time again on their foreign policies and projects like BRI and BRICS, SCO etc., despite western corpo-state media's constant untruthful spins. If you want to learn from China's success, they are willing to teach you but they will always say you have to find your own way to suit your own circumstances. If you threaten China, they will try to make peace but they refuse to be bullied. It is a very rational, respectful and agreeable approach to international relationships. They won't demand that you change your ways, your lifestyles, your economic system, or your politics to deal with them. They won't attached unnecessary political strings to their loans and partnerships. They are certainly not interested in dominating you or take your economic rights to your resources and land. They can always just buy stuff from you as long as you are willing to trade. They also expect the same from you. It is not difficult to deal with China. All you have to do is be honest and fair and take their long history into account and don't try to denigrate, humiliate, and look down on them. No one today is in any position, strength or moral standing to denigrate, humiliate and look down on the Chinese people.
    2
  2026. 2
  2027. 2
  2028. 2
  2029. 2
  2030. 2
  2031. 2
  2032. 2
  2033. 2
  2034. 2
  2035. 2
  2036. 2
  2037. 2
  2038. 2
  2039. 2
  2040. 2
  2041. 2
  2042. 2
  2043. 2
  2044. 2
  2045. This video really encapsulate the core propaganda message of the US government. Around the world, in forums like reddit, the most oft thing you will hear is "I'm not against the Chinese people, I'm against the Chinese government or CCP." There is a concentrated effort to separate the Chinese people from their government, to convince them and the rest of the world that the villain here is the Chinese government, not China. It is a convenient excuse and a clever tactic. By separating the Chinese people from their government, you can achieve a few things. First, it give us the possibility that you can cause chaos in China by making the Chinese people raised up against their government, and it doesn't matter if the Chinese government really do deserve to be overthrown. The goal is to sow the seeds of doubt that all the results achieved by the Chinese people and their government is not real, or not enough, or that someone else can do better without considering who that someone else is. Second, it makes America look more reasonable, because there is always this prevailing idea that the government is automatically bad, and it is just the people being oppressed. We seen this kind of framing many times, when America is preparing to coup another country's government. It doesn't matter whether the government really is bad, or that the majority really hate it, or even if the government is illegitimately elected. It gives American actions a plausible deniability that they are helping the rebels to overthrow a oppressive government and they will keep hammering the propaganda that the government is bad (read: against American interests). Third, it gives its own people the satisfaction that they are doing the right thing, that America stands for what is right and went to liberate a people that needed liberating badly. It prevents normal Americans from examining more closely whether the adversary government really deserve such a drastic intervention from the US government. They give indoctrinated Americans who are already brought up to distrust authority a convenient reason why the intervention must happen and to give themselves a pat on the back. It worked many times, and now they are preparing the American people and the world to absorb the idea that intervention and containment of China is the "righteous" thing to do. It is sinister, it is evil and people like pompeo will lead America down the path of ruin. It is not that pompeo doesn't understand China. It is that he is preparing America to confront China for the sake of the American ruling class (ie the super rich and powerful) to not lose their hegemonic control over America and the world. Mark my words, like Lord Farquaad, they are very willing to sacrifice common American lives to preserve their hegemony.
    2
  2046. 2
  2047. 2
  2048. 2
  2049. 2
  2050. 2
  2051. 2
  2052. 2
  2053. 2
  2054. 2
  2055. 2
  2056. 2
  2057. 2
  2058. 2
  2059. 2
  2060. 2
  2061. 2
  2062. 2
  2063. 2
  2064. 2
  2065. 2
  2066. 2
  2067. 2
  2068. 2
  2069. 2
  2070. 2
  2071. 2
  2072. 2
  2073. 2
  2074. 2
  2075. 2
  2076. 2
  2077. 2
  2078. 2
  2079. 2
  2080. 2
  2081. 2
  2082. 2
  2083. 2
  2084. 2
  2085. 2
  2086. 2
  2087. 2
  2088. 2
  2089. 2
  2090. 2
  2091. 2
  2092. 2
  2093. 2
  2094. 2
  2095. 2
  2096. 2
  2097. 2
  2098. 2
  2099. 2
  2100. 2
  2101. 2
  2102. 2
  2103. 2
  2104. 2
  2105. 2
  2106. 2
  2107. Cyrus, I think all those who watch your channel knows that the debate between totalitarianism/authoritarianism vs democracy/freedom in western media is a bogus exercise designed to distract most people in the west from the simple truth that there is already a deep authoritarianism in the west. Corporate control and authority in the west is near absolute. When we talk about how social media in the west is "free" in that people can spend as much time as possible on them is a superficial representation of liberty. You are free to eat as much salt as you like, but if are gulping down spoonfuls of it, no matter how tasty it is, you are killing yourself. But for the salt industry, they would love if everyone over consume salt in their diet. Western social media is nefarious and malicious in their own ways because they are driven primarily by profits and most importantly control over the narratives that the plutocratic class wants people to believe in. That is why I find the term state media to describe Chinese media to be hypocritical, because in the west, barring a few media outlets, are all controlled by a few corporations. It is far more accurate to say that the media in the west are almost exclusively controlled by the Corpo-State system. They are a form of state media, the corpo-state media because at this point, the state and corporations are functionally the same entity. This is what you could have said but I understand that you will probably get shut down even by shitheads like piers morgan the moment you try to correctly characterize western media as corpo-state media and social media in the west are far more controlling subtle, far more insidious that any forms of propaganda machines out there. The most hypocritical part of this interview is that everything that feckless MP said are done by the west on their own citizens and on others. You and al of us know just how much double standards the west practice everyday. Saying one thing, doing another. Admonishing others to do one thing, and they themselves go ahead and do that same thing themselves. The US wanting to ban tiktok is no more the same reason that China banning western social media, they are afraid of losing control over their citizens' minds. But for the Chinese, they know just how destructive western social media is to the local population, they banned them because they know that the west will use their social media to sow chaos at the detriment of normal Chinese people, all the while characterizing these as agitation for freedom. The US government uses these tactics all the time for coups and chaos. For the US wanting to ban tiktok is because they are afraid of their people starting to get ideas that will go against the capitalist plutocratic class, considering just how terrible conditions are on the ground for most Americans today. The motivations from each country is completely different even if their methods are similar: China wants to protect its people, the US wants to protect its plutocratic hegemonic control over the west. The only difference between Chinese authoritarianism and western authoritarianism is at least the Chinese have a lot of say in their government and what they want tends to come through eventually, but the common citizens of the west do not have any control over who becomes the CEOs, CFOs, COOs, CTOs, the board of directors of the companies and how they ultiamtely plutocratic class. They don't even really have control over who they elect into their government. Western freedom is a sham based on superficial appearances and distracting Orwellian language.
    2
  2108. 2
  2109. 2
  2110. 2
  2111. 2
  2112. 2
  2113. 2
  2114. 2
  2115. 2
  2116. 2
  2117. 2
  2118. 2
  2119. 2
  2120. 2
  2121. 2
  2122. 2
  2123. 2
  2124. 2
  2125. 2
  2126. 2
  2127. 2
  2128. 2
  2129. 2
  2130. 2
  2131. 2
  2132. 2
  2133. 2
  2134. 2
  2135. 2
  2136. 2
  2137. 2
  2138. 2
  2139. 2
  2140. 2
  2141. 2
  2142. 2
  2143. 2
  2144. In America media and narratives, bidenomics is supposed to have created faster growth and reduction in inflation. The Dems are tooting their own horns. But like what Richard Wolff said, if you only cherry pick certain numbers to look at, you can always make the narrative sound whatever way you want. yellen has no choice but to borrow money because the politics in America simply do not allow any party to tighten the belt, nor to increase revenue. They have a huge military to support and biden and the neocons/neoliberals are hellbend on going to war with China so they will have to expand their military. They still have huge amount of entitlements they have to pay (which the American people have already paid into like Social Security and medicare/mediaid). No politicians will survive going into an election year cutting the budget. The American people are living paycheck to paycheck and more and more of them are slipping into poverty. The entitlements are the last things holding back a tide of revolution. The rich and corporations will never ever pay their fair share of the taxes and they control the government. The American system is caught in a negative feedback loop of not enough revenue to support an over blown budget that the people need to survive and the corporations (military industry complex, healthcare industry complex etc.) demand. They have no choice but to borrow. The alternative will be to rein in the corporations and force the rich to pay up, which will mean someone has to destroy this neoliberal system Or implement austerity which will destroy the economy and definitely destroy lives and cause widespread discontent. My own bias is leaning toward destroying this neoliberal system but then I'm a dirty socialist.
    2
  2145. 2
  2146. 2
  2147. 2
  2148. 2
  2149. 2
  2150. 2
  2151. 2
  2152. 2
  2153. 2
  2154. 2
  2155. 2
  2156. 2
  2157. 2
  2158. 2
  2159. 2
  2160. 2
  2161. 2
  2162. 2
  2163. 2
  2164. 2
  2165. 2
  2166. 2
  2167. 2
  2168. 2
  2169. 2
  2170. 2
  2171. 2
  2172. 2
  2173. 2
  2174. 2
  2175. 2
  2176. 2
  2177. 2
  2178. 2
  2179. 2
  2180. 2
  2181. 2
  2182. 2
  2183. 2
  2184. 2
  2185. 2
  2186. 2
  2187. 2
  2188. 2
  2189.  @陈奕纯-u9c  The US is not free to meddle because arming Taiwan IS causing the island to make unilaterally changes. They do it anyway because they never have to suffer real consequences for their actions. They never have to worry about their own land being invaded, their cities burnt and their people dead from committing all these international crimes, provoking wars, causing untold amount of misery and killing other people. Their relative safety made them arrogant to think they never have to consider other countries' concerns, and perspectives. They can do whatever they want and they can always spin it that they are the good guys. The last time their country was directly attacked as in 9/11 they doubled down on their aggressive, oppressive, underhanded and coercive foreign policies. They learnt nothing from their past mistakes, sublimely confidence in the inviolability of their mainland, even after 9/11. The only way they learn is to finally have someone punch them in the face, really, really hard. It seems that they really think they can take on China like they did with the USSR and win. China doesn't want a confrontation and it doesn't want to dominate the world. It just want to not being humiliated and weak and poor anymore. It just want to be left alone to do its own thing and trade and integrate. But the US won't let China be, because China's rise is threatening the western neoliberal capitalist system and that is where the true power in the west lies. The only hope we have is that the Chinese leadership understand very clearly what the US is trying to do and act with strategic discipline and patience and not be baited into some sort of confrontation. Yes, China will likely survive quite after such a confrontation but it will definitely still fucked up a lot of things. But if the US really thinks that it can win a war with China, it is going to be in for nasty surprise. America needs to be taught a lesson. Hard.
    2
  2190. This is beyond just giving face. It is basic mutual respect. If you say one thing and then do another, you are not merely not giving him, you are actively insulting the dignity and intelligence of that person. This is not a Chinese thing, this is not an Indian thing, this is not any particular culture thing, it is basic human decency to express that you are respectful of the other person by not insulting them at the drop of the hat. It's not freedom of speech to lie and cheat and manipulate your deeds and words. It is literally one of the most despicable thing to do IN EVERY CULTURE to say one thing in front of someone's face (blinken visiting China) and then to stab them behind their back (biden calling Xi a dictator). How arrogant can you be to think that the other side have to accept your backstabbing, as though you are in the right. The worst part is that the Americans truly believe they have the right to do this kind of sh*t because it's freedom of speech for them to say whatever they want, especially when they know they are lying or they believe in a lie. Xi is not a dictator, he is answerable to the politburo, the CPC councils, the bureaucracy and ultimately the Chinese people. He can be removed from power. The west just says whomever they don't like is a dictator. The word has become so meaningless only westerners still use it unironically. biden literally lied that Xi is a dictator because it gives him campaign money and votes. That's beyond not giving face. It is immoral, it is depraved.
    2
  2191. 2
  2192. 2
  2193. 2
  2194. 2
  2195. 2
  2196. 2
  2197. 2
  2198. 2
  2199. 2
  2200. 2
  2201. 2
  2202. 2
  2203. 2
  2204. 2
  2205. 2
  2206. 2
  2207. 2
  2208. 2
  2209. 2
  2210. 2
  2211. 2
  2212. 2
  2213. 2
  2214. 2
  2215. 2
  2216. 2
  2217. 2
  2218. 2
  2219. 2
  2220. 2
  2221. 2
  2222. 2
  2223. 2
  2224. 2
  2225. 2
  2226. 2
  2227. 2
  2228. 2
  2229. 2
  2230. 2
  2231. 2
  2232. 2
  2233. 2
  2234. 2
  2235. 2
  2236. 2
  2237. 2
  2238. 2
  2239. 2
  2240. 2
  2241. 2
  2242. 2
  2243.  @Matthew_Loutner  They literally can't cut spending. They can't cut military spending because the MIC won't let them and their imperialist mindset won't allow a voluntary draw down of their overseas bases. They can't cut spending on welfare because most of the working poor class and old people depend on that welfare to survive (barely). They can cut away all the other discretionary spending like unemployment or some departments but those are just drops in the bucket and will likely also put immense hardship on the already tapped out population. And you are further proposing increasing taxes? From who? Certainly not from the rich holding all the capital and assets because they will never allow that to happen. The poor have no more to give since their wages are already not enough to cover their survival and the "middle class" is getting tapped out. No, this is not something you can just adjust. It is a fundamental structural problem with the UAS government spending and the perverse incentives of capitalism that corrupted the democratic process and having it completely hijacked by the rich capitalist class. The UAS government spending is now 30% of the GDP of the UAS. If they pare it back by any significant percent, it will also be a significant drop in GDP and that will reverberate across the entire economy because so many people and companies depend on that spending. They are truly F, and they have to deficit spend to maintain this zombie economy. But the problem is that they are getting their rug pulled from underneath them because the one of last two bastions of the UAS economy, the financial industry where they can still make "money" is getting chipped away by the de-dollarization efforts of the Global Majority and EU, Japan and SK are getting tapped out too. The other bastion, the military industry is also getting hammered because they depend almost completely on government spending and also from other countries, all of which are entering recession or already in a recession, one they might not recover from because all the "allies" themselves are tapped out and is getting blocked from exploiting their former colonies (see West Africa throwing out France and the UAS). They are also losing all their w__s. The west is being de-industrialized (look at Germany) and even the subsidies from the UAS borrowing is not having enough effect to reverse it, the Chips Act is now largely a failure. There is no more renewable energy industry and the car makers are next on the chopping block. The west is no longer producing enough at a competitive cost (no more cheap energy) to earn enough money to pay their debts. They are not growing enough to earn more money and generate value. Cut what? Tax who? Most of the spending is uncuttable without triggering a massive social unrest and the people that must be taxed will never allowed being taxed. Also, your other comment where you said the US dollar value is rising is so wrongheaded that I don't even know how to correct you because it is factually wrong. The US dollar has lost value every single year since nixon abolished the gold standard.
    2
  2244. 2
  2245. 2
  2246. 2
  2247. 2
  2248. 2
  2249. 2
  2250. 2
  2251. 2
  2252. 2
  2253. Democracy should not only be about procedures like voting and the freedom of the press. Results should be the grading cards of democracy. Does that country enact policies that the people want? Or do they enact policies that only the rich and powerful want? Does changing the government change fundamental policies, especially those pertaining to the economy, regulations of big corporations, public investment, education, housing, food security, wages, financial regulations etc., policies that deeply affect people's everyday lives. Do the policies enacted result in sustainable (economic and environmental) growth that sees the standard of living improve for the majority of the people and they have better financial security? Do these policies decrease wealth inequality? Do the foreign policies enacted reflect fair and obey international regulations and laws and reduce conflicts instead of icnreasing and escalating them? Do these foreign policies actually improve the strategic position of the country and thereby improve the security of the people at home? Does these policies improve relationships with other countries and increase trade while maintaining a healthy trade balance? Do the press actually have freedom to dissent, measured by how one sided the narratives presented by the media? Does the government have direct and indirect control over what the media print? Does the government use clandestine means to spy on its citizens? Do they use these means to persecute people who do not adhere to prevailing narratives? Does the social and cultural zeitgeist allow dissenting opinions and narratives to be voiced without the person being "canceled"? I am sure that we start measuring democracy in these ways, the US and most of the west will fail most of the criteria to be a democracy even if the people can vote. The funny part is that China clearly wins on most of the criteria and failed in some.
    2
  2254. 2
  2255. 2
  2256. 2
  2257. 2
  2258. 2
  2259. 2
  2260. 2
  2261. 2
  2262. 2
  2263. 2
  2264. 2
  2265. 2
  2266. 2
  2267. 2
  2268. 2
  2269. 2
  2270. 2
  2271. 2
  2272. 2
  2273. 2
  2274. 2
  2275. 2
  2276. 2
  2277. 2
  2278. 2
  2279. 2
  2280. 2
  2281. 2
  2282. 2
  2283. 2
  2284. 2
  2285. 2
  2286. 2
  2287. 2
  2288. 2
  2289. 2
  2290. 2
  2291. 2
  2292. 2
  2293. @user-hz6fj9xy4y That's not the point and you know it. Russia is still a major economy whether you like it or not, and a major economy that can de-dollarize so fast points to the fact that ANY economy can de-dollarize if they are forced to. Some harder, some easier but it is not impossible. The idea that it is not impossible to de-dollarize, or at least reduce your exposure severely so as to protect your country's economy from US aggression is now very much thinkable, and we are already seeing trends everywhere that non-western, and even some western countries are reducing their reliance on the USD system and subsequently looking for alternatives to do international trade and park their money safely. The trend is what is important, and is routinely ignored by western media and westoids because if they look at the trend, they will despair. So, like you, they like looking at the things now because it look good on the surface and to cherry pick parts they like and ignore the rest of the more important, core parts. It's the same way you point out that Germany's GDP is higher than Russia while ignoring the fact that Germany's economy has become more and more unsustainable as it lost access to cheap energy it needs to fuel its export oriented economy. Russia is now unsurprisingly the fastest growing European country (if Russia can even be called European now). How come you're not mentioning that fact? This points more to desperation and head-in-the-sand mentality than to confidence and objectivity. It's honestly getting pathetic.
    2
  2294. 2
  2295. 2
  2296. 2
  2297. 2
  2298. 2
  2299. 2
  2300. 2
  2301. 2
  2302. 2
  2303. 2
  2304. 2
  2305. 2
  2306. 2
  2307. 2
  2308. 2
  2309. 2
  2310. 2
  2311. 2
  2312. I like some of Bolye boi videos when he exposed some hypocritical aspects of western economies but like nearly every western economist, they can't get out of the neoliberal capitalistic goggles. Everything they say always comes back to that and they can't wrap their head around what China is doing and why their economy is still working and not collapsing. They can't understand how the China can dare to deflate their own real estate sector and reallocate capital towards other more sustainable, more high value sectors like high tech. They thought that China must bail out their over-leveraged developers. Because if China does not do everything that a western country does when facing an excess capacity and a bubble forming, then China must be default, collapse. But China is not collapsing. The Chinese government is still able to enjoy broad spectrum of approval from the Chinese people. They have the mandate to continue their version of centrally planned economy, and people like Boyle just can't wrap their head around how this system can be more efficient at allocating capital then neoliberal capitalism or even classical capitalism. They have been taught (indoctrinated) all their lives that this is the bad type of economic system. So they pick and choose little, irrelevant and unimportant details to criticize China about while refusing to see the huge picture hanging on the wall in front of them. Western economists, save for a few, are honestly some of the most pathetic branch of people on this planet.
    2
  2313. 2
  2314. 2
  2315. 2
  2316. 2
  2317. 2
  2318. 2
  2319. 2
  2320. 2
  2321. 2
  2322. 2
  2323. 2
  2324. 2
  2325. 2
  2326. 2
  2327. 2
  2328. 2
  2329. 2
  2330. 2
  2331. 2
  2332. 2
  2333. 2
  2334. I think there should be a new way to measure democracy: the relative distance between a de jure democracy and a de facto democracy. De jure is that on paper and procedural, a country can be democratic, but if it is not measure with de facto democracy. De facto democracy will measure: 1. the policies that people desire gets enacted vs. policies they don't want or don't care for, will indicate power distribution among the population 2. wealth inequality that indicate how wealth is concentrated, 3. poverty level indicates how fair the overall system is able to redistribute wealth and give prosperity to all, 4. combined 2 and 3 will give us measurement of the utilitarian level of the policies that helps distribution of wealth 5. achieving basic living standards: including true access to education, housing, jobs, savings and retirement, healthcare etc., 6. labor union power measured against corporate power, pervasiveness of unions and whether unions have enough power for negotations 7. imperialistic tendencies of the countries' foreign policies 8. media independence from powerful influences including government and corporations, to examine the level of propaganda that skewed toward powerful elites, both state and private. 9. measurement of the citizens' information bubble derived from covert and overt propaganda and indoctrination - true measurement of freedom of thought If you start measuring democracy in the de facto manner, I will bet a lot of money that the US will drop in democracy ranking tremendously. The current way these metrics are measured is absurdly skewed toward de jure democracy that serves to put western countries on a higher moral pedestal that they do not deserve and these fake moral high grounds are weaponized for diplomatic imperialism from the west. Also, take note that non of the defactor democracy measurements are measuring concepts and system implementation. The results are what matters, and it doesn't really matter what system you used to achieve democratic results - ie. policies and results that benefit the most people possible and keep abuses from the wealthy and political elite low. We will have classification like True Democracy (maybe some Scandinavian countries will qualified) where both the de jure and de facto measurements are high; Superficial Democracy (US, UK and probably most of western Europe, even India) where de jure is high but de facto is low; Practiced Democracy (China, Singapore and some other prosperous countries with stronger dejure authoritarianism) where the de jure is low but de facto is high, and Undemocratic (usually failed states) where de jure is low and de facto is low.
    2
  2335. 2
  2336. 2
  2337. 2
  2338. 2
  2339. 2
  2340. 2
  2341. 2
  2342. 2
  2343. 2
  2344. 2
  2345. 2
  2346. 2
  2347. 2
  2348. 2
  2349. 2
  2350. 2
  2351. 2
  2352. It is rich that westerners are still talking about moralit when their entire economic foundation and standard of living was built on capital made by plundering the world for 500 years of colonialism and today with financial neocolonialism, and exporting their problems to everyone. There is only 1 thief running around because you are not stealing when you are retrieving what was rightfully yours in the first. It will be like saying that Egypt is stealing from the British museum by retrieving the item within. The technological advancements made in the west is built on the high standard of living of the people living there, because there is enough excess resources for colleges to churn out STEM grads, and money to hire these grads and buy the equipment to do research. That excesses, that capital are generated on the foundation built from 500 years of colonialism and neocolonialism. You can go to college and learn math and electronics engineering mostly because your ancestors plundered the Global South to build that standard of living, and even today your government export inflation, and uses the exorbitant privilege of the USD system to squeeze value out of the Global South. Without the loot from colonialism, and sustain from the modern financial system that still extracts value from the world, there wouldn't be an ASML, Intel, AMD, OpenAI, Microsoft, Apple or whatever in the west. Let me end this meaningless question of morality by framing this situation in the correct way: it's time for the west to pay reparations.
    2
  2353. 2
  2354. 2
  2355. 2
  2356. 2
  2357. 2
  2358. 2
  2359. 2
  2360. 2
  2361. 2
  2362. 2
  2363. 2
  2364. 2
  2365. 2
  2366. 2
  2367. 2
  2368. 2
  2369. 2
  2370. 2
  2371. 2
  2372. 2
  2373. 2
  2374. 2
  2375. 2
  2376. 2
  2377. 2
  2378. 2
  2379. 2
  2380. 2
  2381. 2
  2382. 2
  2383. 2
  2384. 2
  2385. 2
  2386. 2
  2387. 2
  2388. 2
  2389. 2
  2390. 2
  2391. 2
  2392. 2
  2393. 2
  2394. 2
  2395. 2
  2396. 2
  2397. Hahahaha you guys are eating so much copium. I stop watching this channel because it was obvious it has a very pro western slang and tend to pick and choose information that makes the west look better and ignore the bad parts or at least put in the irrelevant parts to make it sound balance. China is now bigger than every western country and bigger than several combined. It has developed relationships with the rest of the Global Majority that the west can never ever hope to replicate because you people are still in the colonial mindset so you can never truly foster any cooperative relationships with countries and cultures that do not bend the knee to westernisation. China now has over 30% of the entire world manufacturing capacity. It is already a superpower and its GDP PPP has already surpassed the US long ago. Its economy is based on real products and commodities and it has a government that can pivot decisively and strategically, and solve any economic problems without having to bow down to special interests. It already has everything it needs to research, developed, translate any technology into real things, real value, and it has built all the necessary ingredients to build anything at any scale it wants. It is also the most vertically integrated economy and industry. It has enough military power that it has become untouchable even by the combined force of NATO. It has complete digital and data sovereignty in that its citizens cannot be manipulated against their own interests by outside psyops and cyber warfare. There is literally nothing the west can do against China as it will continue to grow and build for its future and bring actual real prosperity for its people, and those willing to work with them in good faith. Perhaps asianometry is just ill, or perhaps even he has to admit privately that China has already won, in a competition that the west unilaterally foist on the Chinese.
    2
  2398. 2
  2399. 2
  2400. 2
  2401. 2
  2402. 2
  2403. 2
  2404. 2
  2405. 2
  2406. 2
  2407. 2
  2408. 2
  2409. 2
  2410. 2
  2411. 2
  2412. 2
  2413. 2
  2414. 2
  2415. 2
  2416. 2
  2417. 2
  2418. 2
  2419. 2
  2420. 2
  2421. 2
  2422. 2
  2423. 2
  2424. 2
  2425. 2
  2426. 2
  2427. 2
  2428. 2
  2429.  @Sammasambuddha  7 nm is not decades behind. It's 1 to 1.5 gen behind and the front end is not going to get any better. We are reaching the physical limits of Moore's law. Meanwhile, India doesn't even have a comparable semiconductor industry. The one that is decades behind the west and China, and will be a century behind if they don't buck up is India. Once China has its own EUV, they can do whatever they want and the west and India are not gonna be able to stop them. It will likely come within 5 years, 3 if we are lucky. Ohh, you think EUV and silicon based electronics are the end game? China's R&D and industry are also developing next evolution in electronics like photonics and quantum computing and in these areas they are not far behind the west and even surpassed them in some areas. Betting against China is almost always a bad bet. So instead of impotently trying to put down China, why don't the Indians for once, take a humble pill and learn from the Chinese, their system, their culture, their governance on why they have succeeded in pulling 800 million Chinese of out poverty, eliminated extreme poverty and build the most dynamic economy in the world while most India languishes in poverty. And the Chinese did it without colonizing other countries like what the British did to India. India can't even design and build its own engines and radar for its latest destroyer. So if the US don't like India, or it has to do is tell its vassals to stop selling to India and the Indian Navy will be crippled overnight. But hey INDIA SUP[ERPOWAH SUPERERER!!!!!!
    2
  2430. 2
  2431. 2
  2432. 2
  2433. 2
  2434. 2
  2435. 2
  2436. 2
  2437. 2
  2438. 2
  2439. 2
  2440. 2
  2441. 2
  2442. 2
  2443. 2
  2444. 2
  2445. 2
  2446. 2
  2447. 2
  2448. 2
  2449. 2
  2450. 2
  2451. 2
  2452. 2
  2453. 2
  2454. 2
  2455. First, we need to disabuse the notion that the US is a free country, even if it is relative. It is a plutocracy, an oligarchy. It is as free as the oligarchs in the US allow it to be free. It has the superficial appearance of dmeocracy where every part of the process is neutered to the point that most Americans know voting does jack shit. It has so little freedom that most Americans are one surprise 500 USD expenditure from financial ruin. They are living paycheck to paycheck, they are under constant pressure and threat from being fired, they have no real access to healthcare, their education is getting more expensive, they are one financial crisis from losing their homes. They have no freedom because they are not free from the tyranny of their plutocrats. Free speech, having guns, and 20 choices of shampoos are all nice and that, but if you are on the verge of ruin, and is financially coerced constantly to work increasingly shittier jobs while unable to save, invest for retirement and is one illness away from complete disaster, YOU ARE NOT FREE. The fact that you yourself pointed out how a "free" society can be propagandized so efficiently in this stupid "Good vs Evil" dichotomy already showed that free speech does not work in America. Not when their corpo-state media can basically brainwash Americans in any way they want. Freedom of speech is basically weaponized against the American people. They have no real freedom of thought. So please stop saying that America is free. It is not free.
    2
  2456. 2
  2457. 2
  2458. 2
  2459. 2
  2460. 2
  2461. 2
  2462. 2
  2463. 2
  2464. 2
  2465. 2
  2466. 2
  2467. 2
  2468. 2
  2469. 2
  2470. 2
  2471. ​ @nickl5658  No it doesn't. It has been maintiang trade deficit with nearly every country and it is not producing enough trade revenue. The military is supported by debt and borrowing. To do what China does, you will need to sustain a 100 billion dollar investment around the world for 10 years, at low interest rates that will not be repaid for 30, 40, maybe even 100 years. America does not have the production to create this kind of wealth. All it does is recycling other countries' surpluses and financialized it. The real goods and services - those that have real values - America does not produce enough of those. And year after year, China is producing more and more of the real goods and services that America produced at cheaper prices. Lastly, Americans, Europeans and Indians are mostly governed by neoliberal capitalist policies. That means they will always be short-sighted and they will never hold, and they will always negotiate in bad faith - they are always looking out to make a quick buck and screw over the other side. This kind of dynamic is the direct opposite of how China conducts BRI, which is long term, very patient investment, that is in line with their strategic goals of a sustainable development of their BRI partners. They are willing to wait for decades for their partners to pay them back, and get strong so their markets will be open to the Chinese and they build friendly relationships with them. The moment sh*t hits the fan in the Us or Europe and India, watch them start eating each other alive. This is not a sustainable relationship because neoliberal capitalists do not make friends. They do not have partners. They only have themselves and those to be exploited.
    2
  2472. 2
  2473. 2
  2474. 2
  2475. 2
  2476. 2
  2477. 2
  2478. 2
  2479. 2
  2480. 2
  2481. 2
  2482. 2
  2483. 2
  2484. 2
  2485. 2
  2486. Ohh Pepe, China already far exceeded whatever Russia is fielding or coming up with. They probably collaborate but to say they are receiving technology from Russia is just hilarious. They literally have faster, longer range, smarter hypersonc missiles than Russia. They have AI powered satellites that have tracked US carriers from their ports to their exercise grounds and they field some of the most advanced fighters like the J-20, and soon J-35 in the world. Heck, the best Sukhoi is not in Russia, it is PLAAF's J-16 that can fire PL-15, PL-17 (which has a range of 400 km) and a huge AESA radar, high level of composites and now they even have better jet engines, while being supported by very advance early warning planes, ground based and ship based radars in a highly networked system. Their drones are far more advance and numerous and the new Type 076 LHD is most likely going to be equipped with EMALS that can launch drones, making it really the first drone carrier, along with manned helicopters. This is not even considering that China is nearly self-sufficient in every level of technology and production. I know you like the Russians but nearly every aspect of China is way way way above Russia now. I don't think we should be even dismissing the PLA capability in waging war like the way the westoids do, since they have come from one of the greatest military traditions of the 20th century, the CPC fighting the KMT and winning, the Long March, the tactical and strategic genius of CPC commanders, including Mao who literally wrote a textbook on guerilla/asymmetrical warfare. Underestimating China is always a bad idea.
    2
  2487. 2
  2488. 2
  2489. 2
  2490. 2
  2491. 2
  2492. 2
  2493. 2
  2494. 2
  2495. 2
  2496. 2
  2497. 2
  2498. 2
  2499. 2
  2500. 2
  2501. 2
  2502. 2
  2503. 2
  2504. 2
  2505. 2
  2506. 2
  2507. 2
  2508. 2
  2509. 2
  2510. 2
  2511. 2
  2512. 2
  2513. 2
  2514. 2
  2515. 2
  2516. 2
  2517. 2
  2518. 2
  2519. 2
  2520. 2
  2521. 2
  2522. 2
  2523. 2
  2524. 2
  2525. The problem with the west is that they have drank their own kool-aid. They have demonized Russia, China, Iran and other countries like Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea to the point that they have created for themselves these images that these countries are the ultimate evil, antithetical to "freedom(tm)" and "democracy(c)". Their elites and their media have created this mess where now they cannot stop and have to keep pushing forward with confrontation. This is now a good vs evil battle and the west, especially the US cannot extricate themselves out of it. They cannot imagine that these countries are not evil, that they have every right to defend themselves, and they have every right to have their culture, government, society not interfered or dominated by the west. Because they believe only the western model, the western narratives are the only correct ones, they cannot brake, stop and rethink. They have absolutely no self awareness of the horrible things they themselves are doing, since everything is about fighting the axis of evil, the ends will justify the means. Worse, their media can spin black into white, wrong into right so they never have to grapple with the idea that THEY ARE THE BADDIES. That's why we keep hearing these contradictory statements, positions and stances the US take against Russia, China and the rest, They don't think this is hypocrisy or double standards, they think that if you are fighting evil, you can use any methods, and tactics to do so. The rich plutocrats and oligarchs in the west of course know better. They are fighting this because they are afraid of losing the western hegemony that allows them to do whatever they want with impunity. They are afraid that they might have the face the consequences of their crimes so they will drive the west into oblivion to protect themselves.
    2
  2526. The problem with the west is that they have drank their own kool-aid. They have demonized Russia, China, Iran and other countries like Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea to the point that they have created for themselves these images that these countries are the ultimate evil, antithetical to "freedom(tm)" and "democracy(c)". Their elites and their media have created this mess where now they cannot stop and have to keep pushing forward with confrontation. This is now a good vs evil battle and the west, especially the US cannot extricate themselves out of it. They cannot imagine that these countries are not evil, that they have every right to defend themselves, and they have every right to have their culture, government, society not interfered or dominated by the west. Because they believe only the western model, the western narratives are the only correct ones, they cannot brake, stop and rethink. They have absolutely no self awareness of the horrible things they themselves are doing, since everything is about fighting the axis of evil, the ends will justify the means. Worse, their media can spin black into white, wrong into right so they never have to grapple with the idea that THEY ARE THE BADDIES. That's why we keep hearing these contradictory statements, positions and stances the US take against Russia, China and the rest, They don't think this is hypocrisy or double standards, they think that if you are fighting evil, you can use any methods, and tactics to do so. The rich plutocrats and oligarchs in the west of course know better. They are fighting this because they are afraid of losing the western hegemony that allows them to do whatever they want with impunity. They are afraid that they might have the face the consequences of their crimes so they will drive the west into oblivion to protect themselves.
    2
  2527. 2
  2528. 2
  2529. 2
  2530. 2
  2531. 2
  2532. 2
  2533. 2
  2534. 2
  2535. 2
  2536. 2
  2537. 2
  2538. 2
  2539. 2
  2540. 2
  2541. 2
  2542. The west will never be fair to China now because they have deem China a strategic threat. If China puts a target below 5, it means they are collapsing, if they put it at 5, it means they are unrealistic. This tactic is known as hostile evidence presentation: “During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime's atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn't go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them. If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.” - Michael Parenti, Blackshirts and Reds China can cure cancer tomorrow, repel an alien invasion the day after and discover the way to limitless free energy and the western media will say "aT wHat COsT?" What China wants is high quality growth that is sustainable by itself, not a play on numbers by injecting huge amount of money printed out of thin air to temporary shoot the numbers up. China wants to grow good quality muscles that take time and hard work, not give itself steroids shots. That's why the west's pp is getting smaller, they keep giving themselves steroids and growing huge fugly muscles that is disgusting to look at and they will lose when play arm wrestling with a real strongman.
    2
  2543. 2
  2544. 2
  2545. 2
  2546. 2
  2547. 2
  2548. 2
  2549. 2
  2550. 2
  2551. 2
  2552. 2
  2553. 2
  2554. 2
  2555. 2
  2556. 2
  2557. 2
  2558. 2
  2559. 2
  2560. 2
  2561. 2
  2562. 2
  2563. 2
  2564. 2
  2565. 2
  2566. 2
  2567. 2
  2568. 2
  2569. 2
  2570. 2
  2571. 2
  2572. 2
  2573. 2
  2574. 2
  2575. 2
  2576. 2
  2577. ​ @HiranyaGarbh.  The US supported China because they want to exploit China's cheap labor and think that their neoliberal capitalism will create a new generation of corrupted politicians and oligarchs that will favor the US world order. Well, they are wrong and the socialist order still holds strong in China. So now they are regretting it because China is dismantling the neoliberal world order dystopia and they are scared the hell out of their mind. China kept her head down and bide their time. They have a plan to industrialize rapidly and get as much tech into their industries. They are focused, experimental, rational, objective, and driven. They played their role well and let the west exploit their cheap labor, that's true. But they always require tech transfer and they are never complacent. They keep learning and keep trying to build their own capabilities. That's why the Type 055 destroyer is built with nearly all components made in China, while most of the Visakhapatnam-class destroyer's components are imported, especially crucial parts like engines, radars and even weapons. China is using that fiat USD in BRI investment, turning the useless paper into something real and valuable. Partly it's because they don't want to keep holding USD which they can be sanctioned, partly they have these huge amount of surpluses they don't want to park in Wall St. to enrich American financial oligarchs which in turn funds the US military that is hostile to China. While they are able to build the Global South up, make them strong enough to resist the west, provide the world with an alternative way for financing that is not the IMF or World Bank. And also to create good will among all these previously colonized and still oppressed countries that they might one day rally against the west. China not only plays the long game, they play the smart game by using every possible angle to help them reduce their weaknesses and gain strength. Using their surpluses denominated in USD to build up the Global South is a win-win-win-win game. Trillions of USD are used which otherwise would have been parked in Wall St to enrich American rich ratfuckers. That is the kind of 5D chess that Indian politicians will never be able to play, because they are just not at that level. Indian politicians are like children compared to Chinese politicians.
    2
  2578. 2
  2579. 2
  2580. 2
  2581. 2
  2582. 2
  2583. 2
  2584. 2
  2585. ​@pl Of course. Except that strength can come in many forms. The Ansar Allah is strong not because it has huge military power. They are strong because they figure a way to blockade the Red Sea SELECTIVELY (block western and Israel ships while letting other nations not supporting the gen*cide to pass through). They are strong because they are smart enough to leverage their geography and their political will as the legitimate national government of Yemen to fight against a pariah of the world, and thus winning approval from 80% of the world. But the US is not as strong as we are led to believe. Even as they bomb Yemen, the Ansar Allah remains unbent and unbowed and continue to blockade the Red Sea. The FM might be saying we should uphold international order by fighting against the blockade but it is obvious that it is not working for the gen*ciders and their accomplices. It is duplicitous for the FM not to mention that the Ansar Allah has no quarrel with China, Russia and non-western countries. So if Singapore does not support the gen*cide, then the Red Sea is completely safe for Singapore ships. Why should Singapore go solve a problem that the west created for themselves. And yes, China can prosper precisely because it is strong enough to resist American interference and machination. The US will love nothing more than to plunge East Asia/West Pac into chaos by destabilizing China, without any regards to OUR INTERESTS AND SAFETY in this region. If sacrificing a 100 million Chinese lives and 10 million SE Asian lives will ensure American hegemony for the next 50 years while not sacrificing any American lives, the Americans will do it without any hesitation. They did the same in west Asia, they did it in LATAM and they did it in SE Asia back in the 60s and 70s too. The US government is not our friend. They view us all as pawns that can be sacrificed, as soldiers for a mafia that can be thrown into a gang fight. Depending on the US, or China to defend ourselves is a mistake, that I can agree with the FM. Singapore and SE Asia must be strong enough to resist American nefarious machinations politically, economically, socially, culturally and militarily and to maintain a friendly if not a neutral, mutually beneficial relationship with China.
    2
  2586. 2
  2587. 2
  2588. 2
  2589. 2
  2590. 2
  2591. 2
  2592. 2
  2593. 2
  2594. 2
  2595. 2
  2596. 2
  2597. The problem with the west is that they have drank their own kool-aid. They have demonized Russia, China, Iran and other countries like Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea to the point that they have created for themselves these images that these countries are the ultimate evil, antithetical to "freedom(tm)" and "democracy(c)". Their elites and their media have created this mess where now they cannot stop and have to keep pushing forward with confrontation. This is now a good vs evil battle and the west, especially the US cannot extricate themselves out of it. They cannot imagine that these countries are not evil, that they have every right to defend themselves, and they have every right to have their culture, government, society not interfered or dominated by the west. Because they believe only the western model, the western narratives are the only correct ones, they cannot brake, stop and rethink. They have absolutely no self awareness of the horrible things they themselves are doing, since everything is about fighting the axis of evil, the ends will justify the means. Worse, their media can spin black into white, wrong into right so they never have to grapple with the idea that THEY ARE THE BADDIES. That's why we keep hearing these contradictory statements, positions and stances the US take against Russia, China and the rest, They don't think this is hypocrisy or double standards, they think that if you are fighting evil, you can use any methods, and tactics to do so. The rich plutocrats and oligarchs in the west of course know better. They are fighting this because they are afraid of losing the western hegemony that allows them to do whatever they want with impunity. They are afraid that they might have the face the consequences of their crimes so they will drive the west into oblivion to protect themselves.
    2
  2598. 2
  2599. 2
  2600. 2
  2601. 2
  2602. 2
  2603. 2
  2604. 2
  2605. 2
  2606. 2
  2607. Even then, it is a superficial measurement. I think there should be a new way to measure democracy: the relative distance between a de jure democracy and a de facto democracy. De jure is that on paper and procedural, a country can be democratic, but if it is not measure with de facto democracy. De facto democracy will measure: 1. the policies that people desire gets enacted vs. policies they don't want or don't care for, will indicate power distribution among the population 2. wealth inequality that indicate how wealth is concentrated, 3. poverty level indicates how fair the overall system is able to redistribute wealth and give prosperity to all, 4. combined 2 and 3 will give us utilitarian level of the policies that helps distribution of wealth 5. achieving basic living standards: including true access to education, housing, jobs, savings and retirement, healthcare etc., 6. labor union power measured against corporate power, pervasiveness of unions and whether unions have enough power for negotations 7. imperialistic tendencies of the countries' foreign policies 8. media independence from powerful influences including government and corporations, to examine the level of propaganda that skewed toward powerful elites, both state and private. 9. measurement of the citizens' information bubble derived from covert and overt propaganda and indoctrination. If you start measuring democracy in the de facto manner, I will bet a lot of money that the US will drop in democracy ranking tremendously. The current way these metrics are measured is absurdly skewed toward de jure democracy that serves to put western countries on a higher moral pedestal that they do not deserve and these fake moral high grounds are weaponized for diplomatic imperialism from the west. We will have classification like True Democracy (maybe some Scandinavian countries will qualified) where both the de jure and de facto measurements are high; Superficial Democracy (US, UK and probably most of western Europe, even India) where de jure is high but de facto is low; Practiced Democracy (China, Singapore and some other prosperous countries with stronger dejure authoritarianism) where the de jure is low but de facto is high, and Undemocratic (usually failed states) where de jure is low and de facto is low.
    2
  2608. 2
  2609. 2
  2610. 2
  2611. 2
  2612. 2
  2613. 2
  2614. 2
  2615. 2
  2616. ​ @skysky1977  Yes, actually they do. This is not about rights. This is about balance of power and intentions. The fact that they didn't is because they did not want to cause WWIII even though the THAAD is clearly aimed at neutralizing PLARF, thereby set up the conditions where the west can invade China if they want to. Whether THAAD is actually effective is another story. See, you keep trying to spin this as a defense against China but you always ignore the fact that the US can in turn invade China from SK, and that is a real threat to China. To bring home the point, the Cuban Missile Crisis was the other way around but the cause was still that the US threatened Moscow by putting nuclear missiles in Turkey, which the Soviets responded by putting nuclear missiles in Cuba. Obviously the missiles in Turkey was a national security concern, yet when they put missiles tit for tat in Cuba, the Americans reacted with force. So obviously putting assets near a country that can either threaten or neutralize said country's defenses is a glaring provocative move and often is a precursor to invasion. China did not put DongFeng missiles in Mexico or Cuba, so why should the Americans be allowed to be THAAD in SK and sail aircraft carriers up and down the coastlines of China? Because the west is the good guys and all its rivals are the bad guys? Really, are we really gonna go with that logic in spite of the tremendous amount of misery the west had cause and still causing? Remember Iraq 2003? Remember Yugoslavia? Or the other numerous times the US and the west interferes with other countries, invade them based on flimsy pretexts. Not to mention the unilaterally or bloc sanctions that are illegal. So who are really the ones NOT respecting international laws and other countries' sovereignty? Furthermore, If the US can give themselves the right to "pre-emptively" strike at anyone they deem a national security threat, why is this standard not applicable to everyone else too? Because the US is the good guy? Really? This is what we called in civilized countries, double standards and hypocrisy. Ultimately, the problem with the west is their arrogance in their supremacy that they never think they should treat other country's interests and concerns as equal as their own, and that they can just spin that everyone who refuse to participate (ie. bend the knee) to their system do not deserve any considerations, and thus they can be invaded, interfered and the facts and narratives that work against the west or for their rivals are fair game to be distorted, misrepresented and often just lied about. Because the westerners still think in the colonial mind and that they are always right, they are better and everyone else is fodder.
    2
  2617. 2
  2618. 2
  2619. 2
  2620. 2
  2621. 2
  2622. 2
  2623. 2
  2624. 2
  2625. 2
  2626. 2
  2627. 2
  2628. 2
  2629. 2
  2630. They drank their own kool-aid. They really thought they could crush Russia and why shouldn't they? The combined GDP of NATO is several times bigger than Russia. But what they didn't calculate because again they drank their own kool-aid and indulge in arrogance is the response by non western countries. Few non western countries actually sanctioned Russia. The two biggest, China and India did not join the west. China helped Russia by increasing trade with Russia, gave them financial lifelines and India took the opportunity to buy up cheap Russia gas and oil and resold them to the Europeans. What they didn't calculate is that the world will not automatically come to the side of the west. This is a severe miscalculation because they really thought the world is still under western control completely. All this mean Russia can survive sanctions and successfully de-dollarize it's economy and finances. On top of that, the freezing and now the confiscation of Russian reserves in the west is decreasing western financial integrity and trustworthiness. This is in the background of the formation of BRICS, which is now bigger than the G7 and still growing while the G7 is declining. The west thought they had the power to crush Russia so they merrily went to war but their fundamentals have been weakened severely over the years through their own arrogant and hypocritical actions and decisions. They thought they had a castle, but that castle is built on shifting sands. It looks good on the surface but it is collapsing because it's foundation is built on BS.
    2
  2631. 2
  2632. 2
  2633. 2
  2634. 2
  2635. 2
  2636. 2
  2637. 2
  2638. 2
  2639. 2
  2640. 2
  2641. 2
  2642. 2
  2643. 2
  2644. 2
  2645. 2
  2646. 2
  2647. 2
  2648. 2
  2649. 2
  2650. 2
  2651. 2
  2652. 2
  2653. 2
  2654. 2
  2655. 2
  2656. 2
  2657. 2
  2658. 2
  2659. 2
  2660. 2
  2661. 2
  2662. 2
  2663. 2
  2664. 2
  2665. 2
  2666. 2
  2667. 2
  2668. 2
  2669. 2
  2670. 2
  2671. 2
  2672. 2
  2673. 2
  2674. 2
  2675. 2
  2676. 2
  2677. 2
  2678. 2
  2679. 2
  2680. 2
  2681. 2
  2682. 2
  2683. 2
  2684. 2
  2685. 2
  2686. 2
  2687. 2
  2688. 2
  2689. 2
  2690. 2
  2691. 2
  2692. 2
  2693. 2
  2694. 2
  2695. 2
  2696. 2
  2697. 2
  2698. 2
  2699. 2
  2700. 2
  2701. 2
  2702. 2
  2703. 2
  2704. 2
  2705. China's debt are also almost all owed within the country. Hakim is right, China does not have a huge bond debt market. China also has accumulated the highest trade surplus in human history. They are literally awashed with cash. Most of their debts are also in industries that produce real commodities, and much needed services. Personal debts are actually very low and savings are high, and their housing market are mostly houses bought with cash by people or with very high down payments, so mortgage debts are low. China's problem is actually the reluctance of the Chinese people to spend because they are culturally a frugal society that has a phobia of debts and spending too much money too quickly, seeing their history is full of hard times of wars, famines, and disasters. The Chinese people have a lot of capital on their hands. They are doing fine. The Chinese government has the absolute power to nationalize and take over any cancerous company and initiate a controlled implosion to limit the spread of any contagion. It also has the power to de-leverage any industry, restrict any industry to prevent harm from coming to the common people, which they have did numerous times to great effect that has brought relief to the Chinese people. The actions that the Chinese government had taken to protect the Chinese people is transparent for all to see and is one of the driving force for such high approval rating from the Chinese people. The Chinese people know their government stand on their side and they have numerous proofs for that. China is not only growing at 4-5%, they are actually having a deflation now. Which means their real growth is actually even higher and most of it is organic, in important industrial sectors like high tech chip manufacturing. The deflation is deliberate as the Chinese government is trying to implode the real estate market and diversify the country's GDP portfolio. They don't want their real estate to grow uncontrollably, full of over-leveraged developers. That will be a disaster down the market. They are popping the bubble on their own terms so they can build a more sustainable, diversified economy for the future. This is an insane concept for western economists and capitalists. China ain't collapsing. Not by a long shot.
    2
  2706. 2
  2707. 2
  2708. 2
  2709. 2
  2710. 2
  2711. 2
  2712. 2
  2713. 2
  2714. 2
  2715. 2
  2716. 2
  2717. 2
  2718. 2
  2719. 2
  2720. 2
  2721. 2
  2722. 2
  2723. 2
  2724. 2
  2725. 2
  2726. 2
  2727. 2
  2728. 2
  2729. Yes, China has been playing catch up for a long time and most of their efforts have been focused on the transnational, optimization and scaling and less on generating new technologies and discoveries from ground up. But that has already changed for years. Now more and more Chinese scientists are publishing highly original and innovative papers that explore ideas and concepts that have never been considered or asking new questions that emerged from current scientific understanding. Yes China will continue to take ideas suggested by others and make it into a real thing but Philip Wong is a little off the target by implying that is the only thing China does. Photonic chips, steady state microbunching accelerator light source for UV sources, quantum computing, even building and testing their own nuclear fusion and pushing towards Gen 4 nuclear fission reactors are just some of the examples of China innovating their way out. Not to mention their own burgeoning AI research field, and cutting edge battery tech, electronics which are real products that have come from Chinese scientists' own ideas. Heck, the Chang'e program just proves that China is very willing to invest a lot to do research that is highly inquiring in nature, just for the sake of knowing something. Sure the mission has a lot of other benefits and objectives such as planning for a moon base but it is still in short term a scientifically indulgent type of project, something that used to be an exclusive domain of the west, and the Soviet Union.
    2
  2730. 2
  2731. 2
  2732. 2
  2733. 2
  2734. 2
  2735. 2
  2736. 2
  2737. The congress cannot stop spending because if it stop spending, the entire shitfest collapses on itself. No politician in America will do that because they will not survive reelection. No one in the US government can tell the American people that they will have to destroy their current economic system to rebuild it, retool it and re-industrialize. The American people are already suffering from the worst wealth inequality since the Great Depression. Their social fabric is breaking down. Their culture are built on narcissism and delusions. They do not how to build a proper, sustainable, communal society anymore. There is also no way the plutocrats, the oligarchs in America will allow the US government to tax them or even nationalize their companies for the sake of the country. The US is now trapped in a finger trap. They cannot stop spending because the country will die, they cannot ask the American people to suffer even more because they are on the brink of collapse as their household debts are unsustainable, and the political system is completely enthralled by their oligarchs who will never budge on taxes and demand unsustainable growth on their assets. The US is a zombie, a dead man walking and they are too propagandized to understand or care. Heck, the BRICS summit admitting new members which are strategically selected to destroy the petrodollar should be the biggest news right now but everyone in America is celebrating the mugshot of trump and I'm not defending trump; he deserves to be in prison. They are trading temporary relief for even worse pain down the road when they will have no choice but to tank it. It is the most American thing to do: short term relief or gain and kicking the can down the road because their political system and culture simply cannot plan for the long term. We are watching history in the making of how a modern, neocolonial empire fall.
    2
  2738. 2
  2739. 2
  2740. 2
  2741. 2
  2742. 2
  2743. 2
  2744. 2
  2745. 2
  2746. 2
  2747. 2
  2748. 2
  2749. 2
  2750. 2
  2751. 2
  2752. 2
  2753. 2
  2754. 2
  2755. 2
  2756. 2
  2757. 2
  2758. 2
  2759. 2
  2760. 2
  2761. 2
  2762. 2
  2763. 2
  2764. 2
  2765. 2
  2766. 2
  2767. 2
  2768. 2
  2769. 2
  2770. ​ @jameswilliam26 Israel was conceived first as a settler colony state way back in the late 1800s. Zionism is about moving into the Palestinian lands and taking it over. The founder of Zionism even described it to Cecil Rhodes, the infamous British imperialist that the Israel project is "a kind of colony" and seek support from Rhodes and the British empire to make it happen. So even at the very beginning, it was never about giving Jews their homeland because it was never anyone to give. The Palestinian people have been living there, along with other Christians, native Jews who never left or came back over the centuries. The Jewish state as imagined like in the Bible or during the Roman times did not exist for over 1500 years. People moved in and they just stayed and settled there for centuries. At the turn of the 20th century, the Levant was part of the Ottoman empire. It wasn't for the British empire or Rhodes to give away. There is no way that the establishment of a country arbitrarily on land with people already living there for a long time will not involve removing them and the first PM of Israel even said so himself. There is no way an Israeli state can be established without taking lands from the Palestinians. So yes, the modern Israeli state was a colony-settler project, it can only exist by removing the people already living there forcibly and the Jewish state has not exist there for centuries so how can anyone justify forming it in the first place. So Hamas and the people of Palestinians are occupied people and the Israelis are the invaders. That is the objective history.
    2
  2771. 2
  2772. 2
  2773. 2
  2774. All of these maneuverings by Russia and China are to protect their economy while they weather the onslaught from the US. The US can raise interests rates to suck up everyone's capital, sure, but it will cost them a lot in the future when these bonds mature. They are basically cutting their own flesh and use it to slap China and Russia.They lose the flesh and is going to bleed for a long time. All China and Russia have to do is to carefully navigate the dollar system and slowly de-dollarize and wait for the eventual default of the US government. When that happens, the world will be thrown into chaos, especially for countries that depend heavily on the US financial system and economic order. Their treasuries and USD reserve will become worthless, and that's when China will strike the killing blow to US hegemony. So we will be seeing who will crash first, the US with its high interest rates and weaponized currency or China/Russia and the BRICS nations along with the Global South trying to de-risk from the US financial and economic system. I will not be surprise if the US tries something desperate like forcing Taiwan to declare independence in a bid to force China to intervene and hope that a cross strait war will destroy China's economy first before they default. But I think the Chinese leadership knows better. Or the US government severely cut down its spending and crash its own economy anyway. If they cut welfare severely at the point when ordinary Americans are living paycheck to paycheck, no savings, high debts incurred just to survive, it will break the proverbial camel's back. The political, banking, financial and economic system within the US will inevitably conspire against ordinary Americans to save their own skins, which is exactly what capitalists always do. It will make 2008 looked like a stroll in the park. We could even have a socialist revolution in the US. Or the US becomes a white supremacy fascist state, and de-dollarization will be the furthest thing from our mind when fascist America is threatening to launch nukes at anyone refusing to bend the knee. Here is an important point to consider, the dollar does not have to lose all its market share as reserve currency for the US government to default. It just have to be low in demand to the point the treasuries' yield have to be high enough to make the US government unable to service the debt anymore.
    2
  2775. 2
  2776. 2
  2777. 2
  2778.  @gracesutton1359  No problem. But therein lies the core problem; the average American knows very very little about any other point of views, other models, other systems, other ways of thinking outside the American model and are indoctrinated (yes indoctrinated) to not accept outside ideas. The American model is so pervasive that other models simply do not have a chance to make a stand in the "marketplace of ideas" which is heavily curated by pro-American model propaganda. By framing it as American Exceptionalism, it makes learning and adopting outside ideas nearly impossible, and America has clearly lost out on advancements and progress in policy making, politics, systems of economy, philosophical examinations of society and culture, even science and technologies, where places like China and even in Europe are far more open to outside ideas. They have taken the best ideas and adapted them to their society and culture and it is clearly working for them. One prominent example is passenger rail. Europe and Japan have proven that high speed rail works and China sought a solution to their huge population and cities adopted this idea. They know it works, they use it, learn about it and now has the largest HSR network in the world, moving millions of people per month that could have jammed up highways if they were all driving. That was also how the French learned from Japan's Shinkansen and created the TGV for themselves Meanwhile, Americans are making all sorts of dumbass excuses about why HSR won't work in America, and deliberately build cities that have suburb sprawl, killing public transport and then wonder why cities are getting jammed up with traffic with 10 lanes highways and are going bankrupt trying to subsidize these suburbs. It is this American Exceptionalism that is preventing from learning from others and screwing up, not to mentioned the sheer arrogance and entitlement.
    2
  2779. 2
  2780. 2
  2781. 2
  2782. 2
  2783. 2
  2784. 2
  2785. 2
  2786. 2
  2787. 2
  2788.  @MetaView7  Of course they care about national security. The century of humiliation is still a large driving force in Chinese mindset and that's when their national security was so weak they were invaded, bullied and oppressed by the west and Japan. China simply do not believe that national security should be based on fear, oppression on other countries and military might. The BRI, SCO, BRICS and various international organizations they are part of, are all tied back to their national strategic goal of multipolarity and reducing the US hegemony. US hegemony is the most direct threat to China. They know that they should not challenge US hegemony directly through military force but rather to erode it over time through economic development, industrialization, self-sufficiency and most importantly giving the world an alternative to US controlled international organizations like the IMF, world bank, NATO etc., and the USD dominace, so the smaller, weaker countries that do not want to be controlled by Washington has a chance to slip pass that control and develop themselves. A stronger Global South means the collective west cannot dominate them and thus reduce US hegemony. It took them a decade since the BRI was founded and various other organizations to become more mature. This is the kind of long term planning and strategic discipline to keep at it that the west simply cannot match. They do all these because they don't want to be bullied anymore. They don't want to be murdered by neoliberal fascists that control the west. National security is very much on the minds of CPC planners, as it should be. But sanctions like this is just tit for tad and don't really amount to much. The CPC are strategists, they think long term, they planned things carefully, and they adapt quickly to emerging situations. Sanctions used like how the west does it, is tactical, ineffective and ultimately self-destructive so China doesn't use it often, and even when they do, they used it mostly to make a point. Only westerners think this is a big deal.
    2
  2789. 2
  2790. 2
  2791. 2
  2792. 2
  2793. 2
  2794. 2
  2795. 2
  2796. 2
  2797. It is only unavoidable if the US really start some shit, which is very very possible. But the material reality is that every year China and the Global South get stronger. Soon, the west will not be able to control the Global South and China. The west going to war with China at that point will be like going to war with the rest of the world as the Global South will never stand with the west against China. Even if the Global South will not join in the war, they will not cut China off and that is enough for China to survive and emerge victorious using its immense industrial capacity. The west cannot even keep up a tiny war in Ukraine with ammo supplies and equipment. They might ramp up their production but there is no way it can match China's capacity. They can't even match Russia's industrial capacity. Westerners like to joke that the DF-21 is untested and will not be able to hit a carrier. Sure, maybe so, if there are only a 100 DF-21s. But a 1000? 5000? Along with thousands of other anti-ship missiles? You just need 1 hit from that missile to sink a carrier. China can sink the entire USN if China goes full total war mode simply by producing so much weapons it will overwhelm whatever the USN can put out in Pacific. And because they only have a fraction of the shipbuilding and industrial capacity of China, the US won't be able to replace each carrier, destroyer, submarine they lost in time. You're right that diplomacy does not work with arrogant people who believe they are destined to rule. But that calculation alone should hopefully, really hopefully throw some cold water on the a**wipes now in the US government and their insane plans to preserve US hegemony at all costs.
    2
  2798. 2
  2799. 2
  2800. 2
  2801. 2
  2802. 2
  2803. 2
  2804. 2
  2805. 2
  2806. 2
  2807. 2
  2808. 2
  2809. 2
  2810. 2
  2811. 2
  2812. 2
  2813. 2
  2814. 2
  2815. 2
  2816. 2
  2817. 2
  2818. 2
  2819. 2
  2820. 2
  2821. 2
  2822. 2
  2823. 2
  2824. 2
  2825. 2
  2826. 2
  2827. 2
  2828. 2
  2829. A lot of people in this comment thread is taking a regressive take on social justice causes and the humanities. There is nothing in socialism that says the humanities and sociology are parasitic. If you people even bother to actually learn about dialetics, materialism, and what Marx and numerous Marxist/socialist scholars have expounded over the last 2 centuries, you will understand that humanities and sociology (yes that includes gender studies, racial studies, class studies, historical materialism, etc., etc.) are needed for a healthy society to grow. Dialectic materialism, and the Marxist-Leninist system that China is BASED ON, does not rejection the arts, humanities, sociology or the human side of society. It is in fact, the fulfillment of it because socialism is all about fulfilling the utmost of human potential, to ensure the value of the people's labor belongs to them and the ultimate expression of social justice. All of these "woke" studies are naturally part of the socialist ideology. The difference between the western idea of "wokeness" and the socialist idea of true egalitarianism is that the western elites like to pretend that they care about these issues, while hijacking these ideas for their own agendas, weaponizing it, commodifying it, and stripping these ideas of its radicalism for social justice, until it is a product for performing virtue signalling. That does not mean these ideas are not worthy of pursuit, just because western capitalist system strip them completely of its true substance, which is ultimately about social justice and equality for all, prosperity for all. In fact, it is at this point of time, we need to RECLAIM these ideas from the bourgeoisie and give them back their true purposes. I am so sick and tired of people in the comment thread treating these ideas, while tainted by western bourgeois corruption as though they are the same as western bourgeois corruption itself.
    2
  2830. 2
  2831. 2
  2832. 2
  2833. 2
  2834. 2
  2835. 2
  2836. 2
  2837. 2
  2838. 2
  2839. 2
  2840. 2
  2841. 2
  2842. 2
  2843. 2
  2844. 2
  2845. 2
  2846. 2
  2847. 2
  2848. 2
  2849. There should be a new way to measure democracy: the relative distance between a de jure democracy and a de facto democracy. De jure is that on paper and procedural, a country can be democratic, but if it is not measure with de facto democracy. De facto democracy will measure: 1. the policies that people desire gets enacted vs. policies they don't want or don't care for, will indicate power distribution among the population 2. wealth inequality that indicate how wealth is concentrated, 3. poverty level indicates how fair the overall system is able to redistribute wealth and give prosperity to all, 4. combined 2 and 3 will give us utilitarian level of the policies that helps distribution of wealth 5. achieving basic living standards: including true access to education, housing, jobs, savings and retirement, healthcare etc., 6. labor union power measured against corporate power, pervasiveness of unions and whether unions have enough power for negotations 7. imperialistic tendencies of the countries' foreign policies 8. media independence from powerful influences including government and corporations, to examine the level of propaganda that skewed toward powerful elites, both state and private. 9. measurement of the citizens' information bubble derived from covert and overt propaganda and indoctrination. If you start measuring democracy in the de facto manner, I will bet a lot of money that the US will drop in democracy ranking tremendously. The current way these metrics are measured is absurdly skewed toward de jure democracy that serves to put western countries on a higher moral pedestal that they do not deserve and these fake moral high grounds are weaponized for diplomatic imperialism from the west. We will have classification like True Democracy (maybe some Scandinavian countries will qualified) where both the de jure and de facto measurements are high; Superficial Democracy (US, UK and probably most of western Europe, even India) where de jure is high but de facto is low; Practiced Democracy (China, Singapore and some other prosperous countries with stronger dejure authoritarianism) where the de jure is low but de facto is high, and Undemocratic (usually failed states) where de jure is low and de facto is low.
    2
  2850. 2
  2851. 2
  2852. 2
  2853. 2
  2854. 2
  2855. 2
  2856. 2
  2857. 2
  2858. 2
  2859. 2
  2860. 2
  2861. 2
  2862. 2
  2863. 2
  2864. 2
  2865. 2
  2866. 2
  2867. 2
  2868. 2
  2869. 2
  2870. 2
  2871. 2
  2872. I feel that there is no way this is not a coordinated action from the BRICS+ country. OPEC+ announces this right after the BRICS summit, after China has accumulated enough reserves, after the west is cooling off inflation using a lot of debts, after feds rate hikes and after the US strategic crude is at a very low volume? The BRICS countries are too smart to not exploit the economic weakness, the weakest link in the chain in the west that is the the Eurozone. For years, the Europeans have been strung along by the US as vassal states. Their economy is wholly dependent on USD and US financial system. That means they have been sucked dry by the US like a vampire, every time the economy takes a hit. The Feds manipulate rates and everyone suffers for it. The Ukraine war has exposed a weakness in the NATO and the collective west, and the US as per usual only takes care of itself first, is now sucking Europe dry again to prop itself up. There is no way the people in power in Europe, even though they are neoliberal vampires themselves, not know what the US is doing to them. They are not happy but there is nothing they can do except to feed the life blood of their people as protection money to the US. On the surface, the collective seem unify to oppose China and Russia and still trying to subjugate the global south. But I bet behind closed doors, the Europeans are chaffing at being used like a cattle, led to the slaughterhouse to be harvested by the Americans. I doubt the leadership in BRICS+ countries do not know this. They can easily make their own calculations and you can't run away from the numbers. America is draining Europe to prop itself up and Russia is accelerating that drain with the Ukraine war. There is also no way their own diplomatic and intelligence corps do not know the dissatisfaction from the Europeans about their situation that the Americans have put them into. What they need is a coordinated action to inflict as much economic pain at the right time, while shielding themselves from it. Make their economy scream, like what nixon arrogantly said back then. Now, the BRICS+ with the newly joined oil rich countries is going to make the west's economy scream. Who will break first? France? Germany? Italy? Spain? Poland? Who will be the first to call it quits and pick up the phone and call Xi and told him they are ready to play ball. If the BRICS+ collective action really broke the camel's back, this will be biblical. This might be a crazy time but oh boy we are witnessing history in the making. Liquidate as much as you can, keep the cash, get your popcorn and a big bottle of soda, and prepare for the ride. Because we might be finally seeing BRICS+ mete out heaven's justice on the behalf of the oppressed people of the world. The west, and especially the US must be punished for their transgressions and hubris.
    2
  2873. 2
  2874. 2
  2875. 2
  2876. 2
  2877. 2
  2878. 2
  2879. 2
  2880. 2
  2881. 2
  2882. 2
  2883. 2
  2884. 2
  2885. 2
  2886. 2
  2887. 2
  2888. 2
  2889. 2
  2890. 2
  2891. 2
  2892. 2
  2893. 2
  2894. 2
  2895. 2
  2896. 2
  2897. 2
  2898. 2
  2899. 2
  2900. 2
  2901. 2
  2902. 2
  2903. 2
  2904. 2
  2905. 2
  2906. 2
  2907. 2
  2908. 2
  2909. 2
  2910. 2
  2911. 2
  2912. 2
  2913. 2
  2914. 2
  2915. 2
  2916. 2
  2917. 2
  2918. 2
  2919. 2
  2920. 2
  2921. 2
  2922. 2
  2923. 2
  2924. 2
  2925. 2
  2926. 2
  2927. 2
  2928. 2
  2929. 2
  2930. 2
  2931. 2
  2932. 2
  2933. 2
  2934. 2
  2935. 2
  2936. 2
  2937. 2
  2938. 2
  2939. 2
  2940. 2
  2941. 2
  2942. 2
  2943. 2
  2944. 2
  2945. 2
  2946. 2
  2947. 2
  2948. 2
  2949. 2
  2950. 2
  2951. 2
  2952. 2
  2953. 2
  2954. 2
  2955. 2
  2956. 2
  2957. 2
  2958. 2
  2959. 2
  2960. 2
  2961. 2
  2962. 2
  2963. 2
  2964. 2
  2965. 2
  2966. 2
  2967. 2
  2968. 2
  2969. 2
  2970. 2
  2971. 2
  2972. 2
  2973. 2
  2974. 2
  2975. 2
  2976. 2
  2977. 2
  2978. 2
  2979. 2
  2980. 2
  2981. 2
  2982. 2
  2983. 2
  2984. 2
  2985. 2
  2986. I think there should be a new way to measure democracy: the relative distance between a de jure democracy and a de facto democracy. De jure is that on paper and procedural, a country can be democratic, but if it is not measure with de facto democracy. De facto democracy will measure: 1. the policies that people desire gets enacted vs. policies they don't want or don't care for, will indicate power distribution among the population 2. wealth inequality that indicate how wealth is concentrated, 3. poverty level indicates how fair the overall system is able to redistribute wealth and give prosperity to all, 4. combined 2 and 3 will give us measurement of the utilitarian level of the policies that helps distribution of wealth 5. achieving basic living standards: including true access to education, housing, jobs, savings and retirement, healthcare etc., 6. labor union power measured against corporate power, pervasiveness of unions and whether unions have enough power for negotations 7. imperialistic tendencies of the countries' foreign policies 8. media independence from powerful influences including government and corporations, to examine the level of propaganda that skewed toward powerful elites, both state and private. 9. measurement of the citizens' information bubble derived from covert and overt propaganda and indoctrination - true measurement of freedom of thought If you start measuring democracy in the de facto manner, I will bet a lot of money that the US will drop in democracy ranking tremendously. The current way these metrics are measured is absurdly skewed toward de jure democracy that serves to put western countries on a higher moral pedestal that they do not deserve and these fake moral high grounds are weaponized for diplomatic imperialism from the west. Also, take note that non of the defactor democracy measurements are measuring concepts and system implementation. The results are what matters, and it doesn't really matter what system you used to achieve democratic results - ie. policies and results that benefit the most people possible and keep abuses from the wealthy and political elite low. We will have classification like True Democracy (maybe some Scandinavian countries will qualified) where both the de jure and de facto measurements are high; Superficial Democracy (US, UK and probably most of western Europe, even India) where de jure is high but de facto is low; Practiced Democracy (China, Singapore and some other prosperous countries with stronger dejure authoritarianism) where the de jure is low but de facto is high, and Undemocratic (usually failed states) where de jure is low and de facto is low.
    2
  2987. 2
  2988. 2
  2989. 2
  2990. 2
  2991. 2
  2992. 2
  2993. 2
  2994. 2
  2995. That doesn't deny the fact that Israel is gen*ciding the Palestinians. See, that's the problem. The US is still too dominating and they have been getting more and more insane the more powerful China becomes. Singapore is now caught between a rock and a hard place. We have to balance our appearances between the US and China, so there are a lot of things we cannot say. There is no way the Singapore government does not understand the root cause of this conflict is Israel's gen*cidal policy against the Palestinians, given the history of the brutal Imperial Japanese occupation. But unlike China or Russia, we can't say that without being targeted by the US and Israel and the entire western corpo-state media. Singapore cannot be branded as anti-se*ite, even if we know for a fact that opposing Israel's murderous actions is not anti-se*itism at all. But we know the west is not interested in the truth so we have to play the game of appearing cordial to the US and Israel. Singapore needs to diversify its diplomatic commitments. The world is changing and it is clear that China will lead the rise of the Global Majority, as the west declines. It will be a multipolar world. If Singapore is to survive and maintain our sovereignty (not being able to tell the truth for fear of retaliation is not sovereign), it needs to look towards China and slowly get off the sinking ship that is the US. But this has to be done subtly and with deftness, and match the decline of the US and the rise of China. I have to self censor because YT is not censoring any comment with trigger words. Very freedom of speech the west is.
    2
  2996. 2
  2997. 2
  2998. 2
  2999. 2
  3000. 2
  3001. 2
  3002. 2
  3003. 2
  3004. 2
  3005. 2
  3006. 2
  3007. 2
  3008. 2
  3009. 2
  3010. 2
  3011. 2
  3012. The point is not whether the water is safe. It really is still not safe because no one knows what will be the long term impact of releasing the water will be. How about the other radioactive nuclei that has far longer half-lives and also can be easily bioaccumulated? They are choosing this method to get rid of the water not because they are 99% sure it will be safe for the world. They chose this method because IT IS THE CHEAPEST. When you dealing with so many unknown factors, the wisest course is to take the safest way, to err on the side of caution. That's not what we are getting from TEPCO, or the Japanese government and the western backers. What we are getting is they want to cut corners and cheap out and not pay for their own mistakes, of which the first was not building adequate defenses for Fukushima Daiichi against such a tsunami. Because they also cheap out there too. They are cheaping out because that's what capitalists always do: find the cheapest way to get rid of problems and let society deal with the consequences. It is now obvious that the west and their allies cannot be trusted to do proper science and to be truthful. They are committing the same kind of fraud they accuse other non-western countries of committing. At this point, I don't believe anything coming out of western media or opinions. I don't believe a lick of what you said because you people are known to just outright lie for profits. You people always put profits above human lives and the environment. For all I know, the Geiger counter or the dosimeter can be tampered with, because if you people can wants to save billions of dollars, what's a little more than tampering with the equipment? If it is really so safe, why not let the Chinese and Russian scientists examine the water right at the site? Why not open it up to the people who have the most incentives to make sure the water is safe to release? You want me to trust the people who have the most incentives to dump water as it is? We are not morons. We don't trust you people. That is why I find them dumping the water into the ocean to be absolutely hypocritical and morally disgusting.
    2
  3013. 2
  3014. 2
  3015. 2
  3016. 1
  3017. 1
  3018. 1
  3019. 1
  3020. 1
  3021. 1
  3022. 1
  3023. 1
  3024. 1
  3025. 1
  3026. 1
  3027. 1
  3028. 1
  3029. 1
  3030. 1
  3031. 1
  3032. 1
  3033. 1
  3034. 1
  3035. 1
  3036. 1
  3037. 1
  3038. 1
  3039. 1
  3040. 1
  3041. 1
  3042. 1
  3043. 1
  3044. 1
  3045. 1
  3046. 1
  3047. 1
  3048. 1
  3049. 1
  3050. 1
  3051. 1
  3052. 1
  3053. 1
  3054. 1
  3055. 1
  3056. 1
  3057. 1
  3058. 1
  3059. 1
  3060. 1
  3061. 1
  3062. 1
  3063. 1
  3064. 1
  3065. This comment might get removed by YT but here is a little truth. Europe is not sovereign. The UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the nordics, the baltic chihuahuas are not countries. You are all VASSALS of the United Snakes empire and your leaders are all colonial managers, collaborators. You really think you have the freedom to choose your leaders? LOL. The problem for you is that as vassals, you have thrown your lot with the empire and now the empire is having problems of its own, they are abandoning you, and they are straight up going to harvest you like crops, and your leaders have no clue what to do because they never have an independent foreign policies that are not dictated from the Whitey Supremacy Hause. That's why you people are so confused, because you don't even recognized you are vassals, and you don't recognized just how much in disarray your colonial managers are right now. This whole fiasco with Russia is because you followed Whitey Supremacy Hause's foreign policies by deliberately poking the bear, ignoring his requests, his demands, his pleas because all of you think that the bear is just a gas station with n**es, and not an actual country with their own security concerns, their own foreign policies, their own politics and economy, and their own people and culture. You people literally want to regime change them and balkanize them with the rubbing your hands together kind of glee. You have done everything but straight up declare w*r with the bear. And now the bear swipe his claws and smack you in the face, and all I hear is whining and whining and whining. None of you have the balls to seize your own sovereignty, make peace with the neighbor you have to live for the next thousand years, and seek better friends like the Rabbit. I despise the empire for their horrible deeds, their lies and their manipulation but at least I respect the venom of the snake. I have no respect for the chihuahuas.
    1
  3066. 1
  3067. 1
  3068. 1
  3069. 1
  3070. 1
  3071. 1
  3072. 1
  3073. 1
  3074. 1
  3075. 1
  3076. 1
  3077. 1
  3078. 1
  3079. 1
  3080. 1
  3081. 1
  3082. 1
  3083. 1
  3084. 1
  3085. 1
  3086. 1
  3087. 1
  3088. 1
  3089. 1
  3090. 1
  3091. 1
  3092. 1
  3093. 1
  3094. 1
  3095. 1
  3096. 1
  3097. 1
  3098. 1
  3099. 1
  3100. 1
  3101. 1
  3102. 1
  3103. 1
  3104. 1
  3105. 1
  3106. 1
  3107. 1
  3108. 1
  3109. 1
  3110. 1
  3111. 1
  3112. 1
  3113. 1
  3114. 1
  3115. 1
  3116. 1
  3117. 1
  3118. 1
  3119. 1
  3120. 1
  3121. 1
  3122. 1
  3123. 1
  3124. 1
  3125. 1
  3126. 1
  3127. 1
  3128. 1
  3129. 1
  3130. 1
  3131. 1
  3132. 1
  3133. 1
  3134. 1
  3135. 1
  3136. 1
  3137. 1
  3138. 1
  3139. 1
  3140. 1
  3141. 1
  3142. 1
  3143. 1
  3144. 1
  3145. 1
  3146. 1
  3147. 1
  3148. 1
  3149. 1
  3150. 1
  3151. 1
  3152. 1
  3153. 1
  3154. 1
  3155. 1
  3156. 1
  3157. 1
  3158. 1
  3159. 1
  3160. 1
  3161. 1
  3162. 1
  3163. 1
  3164. 1
  3165. 1
  3166. 1
  3167. 1
  3168. 1
  3169. 1
  3170. 1
  3171. 1
  3172. 1
  3173. 1
  3174. 1
  3175. 1
  3176. 1
  3177. 1
  3178. 1
  3179. 1
  3180. 1
  3181. 1
  3182. 1
  3183. 1
  3184. 1
  3185. 1
  3186. 1
  3187. 1
  3188. 1
  3189. 1
  3190. 1
  3191. 1
  3192. 1
  3193. 1
  3194. 1
  3195. 1
  3196. 1
  3197. 1
  3198. 1
  3199. 1
  3200. 1
  3201. 1
  3202. 1
  3203. 1
  3204. 1
  3205. 1
  3206. 1
  3207. 1
  3208. 1
  3209. 1
  3210. 1
  3211. 1
  3212. 1
  3213. 1
  3214. 1
  3215. The west will never be fair to China now because they have deem China a strategic threat. If China puts a target below 5, it means they are collapsing, if they put it at 5, it means they are unrealistic. This tactic is known as hostile evidence presentation: “During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime's atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn't go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them. If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.” - Michael Parenti, Blackshirts and Reds China can cure cancer tomorrow, repel an alien invasion the day after and discover the way to limitless free energy and the western media will say "aT wHat COsT?"
    1
  3216. 1
  3217. 1
  3218. 1
  3219. 1
  3220. 1
  3221. 1
  3222. 1
  3223. 1
  3224. 1
  3225. 1
  3226. 1
  3227. 1
  3228. 1
  3229. 1
  3230. 1
  3231. 1
  3232. 1
  3233. 1
  3234. 1
  3235. 1
  3236. 1
  3237. 1
  3238. 1
  3239. 1
  3240. 1
  3241. 1
  3242. 1
  3243. 1
  3244. 1
  3245. 1
  3246. 1
  3247. 1
  3248. 1
  3249. 1
  3250. 1
  3251. 1
  3252. 1
  3253. 1
  3254. 1
  3255. 1
  3256. 1
  3257. 1
  3258. 1
  3259. 1
  3260. 1
  3261. 1
  3262. 1
  3263. 1
  3264. 1
  3265. 1
  3266. 1
  3267. 1
  3268. 1
  3269. 1
  3270. 1
  3271. 1
  3272. 1
  3273. 1
  3274. 1
  3275. 1
  3276. 1
  3277. 1
  3278. 1
  3279. 1
  3280. 1
  3281. 1
  3282. 1
  3283. 1
  3284. 1
  3285. 1
  3286. 1
  3287. 1
  3288. 1
  3289. 1
  3290. 1
  3291. 1
  3292. 1
  3293. 1
  3294. 1
  3295. 1
  3296. 1
  3297. 1
  3298. 1
  3299. 1
  3300. 1
  3301. 1
  3302. 1
  3303. 1
  3304. 1
  3305. 1
  3306. It's not just trump. It's the fact that the GQP protected trump for two impeachments when it was clearly plain to everyone (everyone not brainwashed by right wing propaganda) that trump had strong armed another country's leader to make up fake dirt on Biden (1st impeachment) and that he incited a coup attempt (2nd impeachment). Like what Adam Schiff said, if right doesn't matter, we're lost. The republicans are lost because right doesn't matter to them anymore and if right doesn't matter, the rule of law doesn't matter, facts doesn't matter, truth doesn't matter and anyone who knows how to use their bigotry and fears will rise to their leadership positions and that's exactly what all of them are trying to do now. This is the beginning of how an authoritarian fascist party can seize power. It's how Hilter rose to power. It's how a lot of dictators rose to power. There is a fundamental problem with our current political situation and it all points towards the GQP becoming more and more fascist every day. If you're China and you look at this, who will be the number one scapegoat in a fascist America? It will be "moi". Then you consider that we have the most powerful military in the world, along with thousands of nukes, a fascist America is an existential threat to China and pretty much the rest of the world, and we have never come closer to that since the interwar period. All you have to do is talk to trump supporters and the only conclusion for China is "yup, we might get nuked in 30 years."
    1
  3307. 1
  3308. 1
  3309. 1
  3310. 1
  3311. 1
  3312. 1
  3313. 1
  3314. 1
  3315. 1
  3316. 1
  3317. 1
  3318. 1
  3319. 1
  3320. 1
  3321. 1
  3322. 1
  3323. 1
  3324. 1
  3325. 1
  3326. 1
  3327. 1
  3328. 1
  3329. 1
  3330. 1
  3331. 1
  3332. 1
  3333. 1
  3334. 1
  3335. 1
  3336. 1
  3337. 1
  3338. 1
  3339. 1
  3340. 1
  3341. 1
  3342. 1
  3343. 1
  3344. 1
  3345. 1
  3346. 1
  3347. 1
  3348. 1
  3349. 1
  3350. 1
  3351. 1
  3352. 1
  3353. 1
  3354. 1
  3355. 1
  3356. 1
  3357. 1
  3358. 1
  3359. 1
  3360. 1
  3361. 1
  3362. 1
  3363. 1
  3364. 1
  3365. 1
  3366. 1
  3367. 1
  3368. 1
  3369. 1
  3370. 1
  3371. 1
  3372. 1
  3373. 1
  3374. 1
  3375. 1
  3376. 1
  3377. 1
  3378. 1
  3379. 1
  3380. 1
  3381. 1
  3382. 1
  3383. 1
  3384. 1
  3385. 1
  3386. 1
  3387. 1
  3388. 1
  3389. 1
  3390. 1
  3391. 1
  3392. 1
  3393. 1
  3394. 1
  3395. 1
  3396. 1
  3397. 1
  3398. 1
  3399. 1
  3400. 1
  3401. 1
  3402. 1
  3403. 1
  3404. 1
  3405. 1
  3406. 1
  3407. 1
  3408. 1
  3409. 1
  3410. 1
  3411. 1
  3412. 1
  3413. 1
  3414. That doesn't deny the fact that Israel is gen*ciding the Palestinians. See, that's the problem. The US is still too dominating and they have been getting more and more insane the more powerful China becomes. Singapore is now caught between a rock and a hard place. We have to balance our appearances between the US and China, so there are a lot of things we cannot say. There is no way the Singapore government does not understand the root cause of this conflict is Israel's gen*cidal policy against the Palestinians, given the history of the brutal Imperial Japanese occupation. But unlike China or Russia, we can't say that without being targeted by the US and Israel and the entire western corpo-state media. Singapore cannot be branded as anti-se*ite, even if we know for a fact that opposing Israel's murderous actions is not anti-se*itism at all. But we know the west is not interested in the truth so we have to play the game of appearing cordial to the US and Israel. Singapore needs to diversify its diplomatic commitments. The world is changing and it is clear that China will lead the rise of the Global Majority, as the west declines. It will be a multipolar world. If Singapore is to survive and maintain our sovereignty (not being able to tell the truth for fear of retaliation is not sovereign), it needs to look towards China and slowly get off the sinking ship that is the US. But this has to be done subtly and with deftness, and match the decline of the US and the rise of China. I have to self censor because YT is not censoring any comment with trigger words. Very freedom of speech the west is.
    1
  3415. 1
  3416. 1
  3417. 1
  3418. 1
  3419. 1
  3420. 1
  3421. 1
  3422. 1
  3423. 1
  3424. 1
  3425. 1
  3426. 1
  3427. 1
  3428. 1
  3429. 1
  3430. 1
  3431. 1
  3432. 1
  3433. 1
  3434. 1
  3435. 1
  3436. 1
  3437. 1
  3438. 1
  3439. 1
  3440. 1
  3441. 1
  3442. 1
  3443. 1
  3444. 1
  3445. 1
  3446. 1
  3447. 1
  3448. 1
  3449. 1
  3450. 1
  3451. 1
  3452. 1
  3453. 1
  3454. 1
  3455. 1
  3456. 1
  3457. 1
  3458. 1
  3459. 1
  3460. 1
  3461. 1
  3462. 1
  3463. 1
  3464. 1
  3465. 1
  3466. 1
  3467. 1
  3468. 1
  3469. 1
  3470. 1
  3471. 1
  3472. 1
  3473. 1
  3474. 1
  3475. 1
  3476. 1
  3477. 1
  3478. 1
  3479. 1
  3480. 1
  3481. 1
  3482. 1
  3483. 1
  3484. 1
  3485. 1
  3486. 1
  3487. 1
  3488. 1
  3489. 1
  3490. 1
  3491. 1
  3492. 1
  3493. 1
  3494. 1
  3495. 1
  3496. 1
  3497. 1
  3498. 1
  3499. 1
  3500. 1
  3501. 1
  3502. 1
  3503. 1
  3504. 1
  3505. 1
  3506. 1
  3507. 1
  3508. 1
  3509. 1
  3510. 1
  3511. 1
  3512. 1
  3513. 1
  3514. 1
  3515. 1
  3516. 1
  3517. 1
  3518. 1
  3519. 1
  3520. 1
  3521. 1
  3522. 1
  3523. 1
  3524. 1
  3525. 1
  3526. 1
  3527. 1
  3528. 1
  3529. 1
  3530. 1
  3531. 1
  3532. 1
  3533. 1
  3534. 1
  3535. 1
  3536. 1
  3537. 1
  3538. 1
  3539. 1
  3540. 1
  3541. 1
  3542. 1
  3543.  @MuZisong  You still do not understand. The PM of Singapore do not represent jsut Chinese. He represent ALL OF SINGAPORE. ALL. Not just Chinese, not just Malays, not just Indians, and not just half a dozens of other races. ALL SINGAPOREANS! And all Singaporeans speak English and understand English and if they need to hear what their PM is saying to another country's leader, they hear it in English. It is the same idea for the president of China. He represent ALL of China and everyone speaks mandarin so the Chinese will want to hear him speaks in Chinese to another country's leader, even though English is still the default language that most people will use in the world. This is not about being Chinese, this is about being a leader. Who can you not understand this? This level of ignorance is how Americans behave. Do you want to behave like an ignorant, provincial, racist, and arrogant America? Or you want to be better? 你还是不明白。新加坡总理不代表华人。他代表整个新加坡。全部。不只是华人,不只是马来人,不只是印度人,不只是半打其他种族。所有新加坡人!所有新加坡人都说英语并且听得懂英语,如果他们需要听到他们的总理对另一个国家的领导人说的话,他们会用英语听到。 中国国家主席也是一样的想法。他代表全中国,每个人都说普通话,所以中国人会想听他用中文对另一个国家的领导人讲话,尽管英语仍然是世界上大多数人使用的默认语言。 这不是关于华人或会说华语,而是关于领导者的身份。这谁能不明白?这种无知程度就是美国人的行为方式。你想表现得像一个无知、狭隘、种族主义和傲慢的美国吗?或者你想变得更好?
    1
  3544. 1
  3545. 1
  3546. 1
  3547. 1
  3548. 1
  3549. 1
  3550. 1
  3551. 1
  3552. 1
  3553. 1
  3554. 1
  3555. 1
  3556. 1
  3557. 1
  3558. 1
  3559. 1
  3560. 1
  3561. 1
  3562. 1
  3563. 1
  3564. 1
  3565. 1
  3566. Tiltrotors, like helicopters sound good on paper but is actually much worse right now. Tiltrotors are far more complex and more accident prone. That translate to even higher operational and upfront costs, to the point even wealthy passengers might balk at the price. They will never be big enough to really ferry enough passenger per trip to really benefit from the economies of scale like jetliner, metros, trains and buses. On top of that, no city will allow tiltrotors to operate just from rooftops of garages because they are insanely noisy. Helicopters are bad enough, tiltrotors are likely to be even worse. Having multiple tiltrotors landing and taking off regularly in the middle of the city - which is already noisy - will push local residents or workers insane. A few things have to happen before helicopters or tiltrotors can become regular passenger liners. Costs have to go down, helicopter already achieve that for premium market, this is impossible right now for tiltrotors. Decrease complexity and increase reliability - this bring us directly into costs too as complexity increase maintenance and reliability decrease it. Costs have to go down to at least just 10 times the mass transit by per passenger per mile for the premium market and only about 2 - 3 times to have a chance to penetrate the masses. Most upper middle class people are willing to pay 2 - 3 times more to use a regular service to save time and headaches of driving and public transport and that's when you have a possible chance to make the business viable. Lastly, technology has to improve to the point where the noise level is comparable to a loud bus before such transport is even possible to operate in city centers. I don't see helicopters ever meeting these challenges, much less tiltrotors in the near future.
    1
  3567. 1
  3568. 1
  3569. 1
  3570. 1
  3571. 1
  3572. 1
  3573. 1
  3574. 1
  3575. 1
  3576. 1
  3577. 1
  3578. 1
  3579. 1
  3580. 1
  3581. 1
  3582. 1
  3583. 1
  3584. 1
  3585. 1
  3586. 1
  3587. 1
  3588. 1
  3589. 1
  3590. 1
  3591. 1
  3592. 1
  3593. 1
  3594. 1
  3595. 1
  3596. 1
  3597. 1
  3598. 1
  3599. 1
  3600. 1
  3601. 1
  3602. 1
  3603. 1
  3604. 1
  3605. 1
  3606. 1
  3607. 1
  3608. 1
  3609. 1
  3610. 1
  3611. 1
  3612. 1
  3613. 1
  3614. 1
  3615. 1
  3616. 1
  3617. 1
  3618. 1
  3619. 1
  3620. 1
  3621. 1
  3622. 1
  3623. 1
  3624. 1
  3625. 1
  3626. 1
  3627. 1
  3628. 1
  3629. 1
  3630. 1
  3631. 1
  3632. 1
  3633. 1
  3634. 1
  3635. 1
  3636. 1
  3637. 1
  3638. 1
  3639. 1
  3640. 1
  3641. 1
  3642. 1
  3643. 1
  3644. 1
  3645. 1
  3646. 1
  3647. 1
  3648. 1
  3649. 1
  3650. 1
  3651. 1
  3652. 1
  3653. 1
  3654. 1
  3655. 1
  3656. 1
  3657. 1
  3658. 1
  3659. 1
  3660. 1
  3661. 1
  3662. 1
  3663. 1
  3664. 1
  3665. 1
  3666. 1
  3667. 1
  3668. 1
  3669. 1
  3670. 1
  3671. 1
  3672. 1
  3673. 1
  3674. 1
  3675. 1
  3676. 1
  3677. 1
  3678. 1
  3679. 1
  3680. 1
  3681. 1
  3682. 1
  3683. 1
  3684. 1
  3685. 1
  3686. 1
  3687. 1
  3688. 1
  3689. 1
  3690. 1
  3691. 1
  3692. 1
  3693. 1
  3694. 1
  3695. 1
  3696. 1
  3697. 1
  3698. 1
  3699. 1
  3700. 1
  3701. 1
  3702. 1
  3703. 1
  3704. 1
  3705. 1
  3706. 1
  3707. 1
  3708. 1
  3709. 1
  3710. 1
  3711. 1
  3712. 1
  3713. 1
  3714. 1
  3715. 1
  3716. 1
  3717. 1
  3718. 1
  3719. 1
  3720. 1
  3721. 1
  3722. 1
  3723. 1
  3724. 1
  3725. 1
  3726. 1
  3727. 1
  3728. 1
  3729. 1
  3730. 1
  3731. 1
  3732. 1
  3733. 1
  3734. 1
  3735. 1
  3736. 1
  3737. 1
  3738. 1
  3739. 1
  3740. 1
  3741. 1
  3742. 1
  3743. 1
  3744. 1
  3745. 1
  3746. 1
  3747. 1
  3748. 1
  3749. 1
  3750. 1
  3751. 1
  3752. 1
  3753. 1
  3754. 1
  3755. 1
  3756. 1
  3757. 1
  3758. 1
  3759. 1
  3760. 1
  3761. 1
  3762. 1
  3763. 1
  3764. 1
  3765. 1
  3766. 1
  3767. 1
  3768. 1
  3769. 1
  3770. 1
  3771. 1
  3772. 1
  3773. 1
  3774. 1
  3775. 1
  3776. 1
  3777. 1
  3778. 1
  3779. 1
  3780. 1
  3781. 1
  3782. 1
  3783. 1
  3784. 1
  3785. 1
  3786. 1
  3787. 1
  3788. 1
  3789. 1
  3790. 1
  3791. 1
  3792. 1
  3793. 1
  3794. 1
  3795. 1
  3796. 1
  3797. 1
  3798. 1
  3799. 1
  3800. 1
  3801. 1
  3802. 1
  3803. 1
  3804. 1
  3805. 1
  3806. 1
  3807. 1
  3808. 1
  3809. 1
  3810. 1
  3811. 1
  3812. 1
  3813. 1
  3814. 1
  3815. 1
  3816. 1
  3817. 1
  3818. 1
  3819. 1
  3820. 1
  3821. 1
  3822. 1
  3823. 1
  3824. 1
  3825. 1
  3826. 1
  3827. 1
  3828. 1
  3829. 1
  3830. 1
  3831. 1
  3832. 1
  3833. 1
  3834. 1
  3835. 1
  3836. 1
  3837. 1
  3838. 1
  3839. 1
  3840. 1
  3841. 1
  3842. 1
  3843. 1
  3844. 1
  3845. 1
  3846. 1
  3847. 1
  3848. 1
  3849. 1
  3850. 1
  3851. 1
  3852. 1
  3853. 1
  3854. 1
  3855. 1
  3856. 1
  3857. 1
  3858. 1
  3859. 1
  3860. 1
  3861. 1
  3862. 1
  3863. 1
  3864. ​ @L98fiero  That is such a regressive and dumb take. There is nothing in socialism that says the humanities and sociology are parasitic. If you people even bother to actually learn about dialetics, materialism, and what Marx and numerous Marxist/socialist scholars have expounded over the last 2 centuries, you will understand that humanities and sociology (yes that includes gender studies, racial studies, class studies, historical materialism, etc., etc.) are needed for a healthy society to grow. Dialectic materialism, and the Marxist-Leninist system that China is BASED ON, is not a rejection of the arts, humanities, sociology or the human side of society. It is in fact, the fulfillment of it because socialism is all about fulfilling the utmost of human potential, to ensure the value of the people's labor belongs to them and the ultimate expression of social justice. All of these "woke" studies are naturally part of the socialist ideology. The difference between the western idea of "wokeness" and the socialist idea of true egalitarianism is that the west likes to pretend that it cares about these issues, while hijacking these ideas for their own aganedas, weaponizing it, coommodifying it, and stripping these ideas of its radicalism for social justice, until it is a product of performance virtue signalling. That does not mean these ideas are not worthy of pursuit, just because western capitalist system strip them completely of its true substance, which is ultimately about social justice and equality for all, prosperity for all. In fact, it is at this point of time, we need to RECLAIM these ideas from the bourgeoisie and give them back their true purpose. I am so sick and tired of people in the comment thread treating these ideas, while tainted by western bourgeois corruption as though they are the same as western bourgeois corruption itself.
    1
  3865. 1
  3866. 1
  3867. 1
  3868. 1
  3869. 1
  3870. 1
  3871. 1
  3872. 1
  3873. 1
  3874. 1
  3875. 1
  3876. 1
  3877. 1
  3878. 1
  3879. 1
  3880. 1
  3881. 1
  3882. 1
  3883. 1
  3884. 1
  3885. 1
  3886. 1
  3887. 1
  3888. 1
  3889. ​ @charleshinton8565  You are looking at the wrong thing as usual from westerners who have very limited view of the world. The point is that the USD is the financial colonialism power of the US. Making sure that it stays the dominant currency used in international trade is crucial to keep USD in demand and thus allow the Fed to print them with impunity. In turn, the USD circulating outside, which is basically real commodities being monetized returns to the US in the form of US treasuries, thus completely the cycle. What mBridge and other de-dollarization efforts are doing is to break that cycle from different parts. mBridge breask using the USD for international trade. Dumping US treasuries and setting up alternate financial systems to deal with the USD circulating outside the US breaks the cycle of recycling back the USD to the US government. All of these break the demand for USD, which are just worthless pieces of paper at the end of the day, because it is the commodities and services being sold and bought in USD that give that piece of paper purpose. The USD won't go away and will likely remain a well traded currency. But the point is that the demand for it will drop, for various reasons including the US government weaponizing it, will force the Feds unable to print money without causing a local hyperinflation and flatten the US economy. It will also cause borrowing costs to spiral upwards, forcing the US government to have to make cut backs and bringing it to its knees, hopefully neutering the imperialistic military. Americans will either have to tighten their belts a lot, increase their efficiency in using their money to produce REAL value (military, finance, healthcare spending are not real valuable things) or they finally revolt and change their system that actually can deliver prosperity without exploiting other people and stealing the value they produce, which is exactly what using USD for international trade does.
    1
  3890. 1
  3891. 1
  3892. 1
  3893. 1
  3894. 1
  3895. 1
  3896. 1
  3897. 1
  3898. 1
  3899. 1
  3900. 1
  3901. 1
  3902. 1
  3903. 1
  3904. 1
  3905. 1
  3906. 1
  3907. 1
  3908. 1
  3909. 1
  3910. 1
  3911. 1
  3912. 1
  3913. 1
  3914. 1
  3915. 1
  3916. 1
  3917. 1
  3918. 1
  3919. 1
  3920. 1
  3921. 1
  3922. 1
  3923. 1
  3924. 1
  3925. 1
  3926. 1
  3927. 1
  3928. 1
  3929. 1
  3930. 1
  3931. 1
  3932. 1
  3933. 1
  3934. 1
  3935. 1
  3936. 1
  3937. 1
  3938. 1
  3939. 1
  3940. 1
  3941. 1
  3942. 1
  3943. 1
  3944. 1
  3945. 1
  3946. 1
  3947. 1
  3948. 1
  3949. 1
  3950. 1
  3951. 1
  3952. 1
  3953. 1
  3954. 1
  3955. 1
  3956. 1
  3957. 1
  3958. 1
  3959. 1
  3960. 1
  3961. 1
  3962. 1
  3963. 1
  3964. 1
  3965. 1
  3966. 1
  3967. 1
  3968. 1
  3969. 1
  3970. 1
  3971. 1
  3972. 1
  3973. 1
  3974. 1
  3975. 1
  3976. 1
  3977. 1
  3978. 1
  3979. 1
  3980. 1
  3981. 1
  3982. 1
  3983. 1
  3984. 1
  3985. 1
  3986. 1
  3987. 1
  3988. 1
  3989. 1
  3990. 1
  3991. 1
  3992. 1
  3993. 1
  3994. 1
  3995. 1
  3996. 1
  3997. 1
  3998. 1
  3999. 1
  4000. 1
  4001. 1
  4002. 1
  4003. 1
  4004. 1
  4005. 1
  4006. 1
  4007. 1
  4008. 1
  4009. 1
  4010. 1
  4011. 1
  4012. 1
  4013. 1
  4014. 1
  4015. 1
  4016. 1
  4017. 1
  4018. 1
  4019. 1
  4020. 1
  4021. 1
  4022. 1
  4023. 1
  4024. 1
  4025. 1
  4026. 1
  4027. 1
  4028. 1
  4029. 1
  4030. 1
  4031. 1
  4032. 1
  4033. 1
  4034. 1
  4035. 1
  4036. 1
  4037. 1
  4038. 1
  4039. 1
  4040. 1
  4041. 1
  4042. 1
  4043. 1
  4044. 1
  4045. 1
  4046. 1
  4047. 1
  4048. 1
  4049. 1
  4050. 1
  4051. 1
  4052. 1
  4053. 1
  4054. 1
  4055. 1
  4056. 1
  4057. 1
  4058. 1
  4059. 1
  4060. 1
  4061. 1
  4062. 1
  4063. 1
  4064. 1
  4065. 1
  4066. 1
  4067. 1
  4068. 1
  4069. 1
  4070. 1
  4071. 1
  4072. 1
  4073. 1
  4074. 1
  4075. 1
  4076. 1
  4077. 1
  4078. 1
  4079. 1
  4080. 1
  4081. 1
  4082. 1
  4083. 1
  4084. 1
  4085. 1
  4086. 1
  4087. 1
  4088. 1
  4089. 1
  4090. 1
  4091. 1
  4092. 1
  4093. 1
  4094. 1
  4095. 1
  4096. 1
  4097. 1
  4098. 1
  4099. 1
  4100. 1
  4101. 1
  4102. 1
  4103. 1
  4104. 1
  4105. 1
  4106. 1
  4107. 1
  4108. 1
  4109. 1
  4110. 1
  4111. 1
  4112. 1
  4113. 1
  4114. 1
  4115. 1
  4116. 1
  4117. 1
  4118. 1
  4119. 1
  4120. 1
  4121. 1
  4122. 1
  4123. 1
  4124. 1
  4125. 1
  4126. 1
  4127. 1
  4128. 1
  4129. 1
  4130. 1
  4131. 1
  4132. 1
  4133. 1
  4134. 1
  4135. 1
  4136. 1
  4137. 1
  4138. 1
  4139. 1
  4140. 1
  4141. 1
  4142. 1
  4143. 1
  4144. 1
  4145. 1
  4146. 1
  4147. 1
  4148. 1
  4149. 1
  4150. 1
  4151. 1
  4152. 1
  4153. 1
  4154. 1
  4155. 1
  4156. 1
  4157. 1
  4158. 1
  4159. 1
  4160. 1
  4161. 1
  4162. 1
  4163. 1
  4164. 1
  4165. 1
  4166. 1
  4167. 1
  4168. 1
  4169. 1
  4170. 1
  4171. 1
  4172. 1
  4173. 1
  4174. 1
  4175. 1
  4176. 1
  4177. 1
  4178. 1
  4179. 1
  4180. 1
  4181. 1
  4182. 1
  4183. 1
  4184. 1
  4185. 1
  4186. 1
  4187. 1
  4188. 1
  4189. 1
  4190. 1
  4191. 1
  4192. 1
  4193. 1
  4194. 1
  4195. 1
  4196. 1
  4197. 1
  4198. 1
  4199. 1
  4200. 1
  4201. 1
  4202. 1
  4203. 1
  4204. 1
  4205. 1
  4206. 1
  4207. 1
  4208. 1
  4209. 1
  4210. 1
  4211. 1
  4212. 1
  4213. 1
  4214. 1
  4215. 1
  4216. 1
  4217. 1
  4218. 1
  4219. 1
  4220. 1
  4221. 1
  4222. 1
  4223. 1
  4224. 1
  4225. 1
  4226. 1
  4227. 1
  4228. 1
  4229.  @Longcloud  A personal property is something you own that you use or consume. Like your toothbrush you use to brush your teeth, or your car that you use to move around or even your house that you live in. A private property is something you own that can generate capital. Like a factory that you bought or tell others to build for you because you have capital in the first place. Then you proceed to take the surplus value generated by the factory simply because you have your name on it. When the west seize Russian assets, they are taking the capital of Russia and giving it to their own private capital in the forms of weapons payment. Private property for private capitalists in the west are very much protected and will even have more private capital/properties. You and I and this OP have personal properties. We are not even in the club of owning private properties to be affected by this. But the fact that everything is becoming a subscription or leasing model means you don't even get to own personal properties anymore because all your personal properties are becoming the private properties of the private capital to extract rent out of. This is the problem with 99% of westerners. They are so miseducated about the economy and deliberately so, that they are not even equipped at a basic level to understand what's going on. It's like trying to do orbital mechanics by believing in an Earth centered system. It is also how you get people thinking that socialism is when the gubmint owns your car and completely miss that companies are trying to turn your car into their own private property by forcing you to get a subscription for its "extra" features.
    1
  4230. 1
  4231. 1
  4232. 1
  4233. 1
  4234. 1
  4235. 1
  4236. 1
  4237. 1
  4238. 1
  4239. 1
  4240. 1
  4241. 1
  4242. 1
  4243. 1
  4244. 1
  4245. 1
  4246. 1
  4247. 1
  4248. 1
  4249. 1
  4250. 1
  4251. 1
  4252. 1
  4253. 1
  4254. 1
  4255. 1
  4256. 1
  4257. 1
  4258. 1
  4259. 1
  4260. 1
  4261. 1
  4262. 1
  4263. 1
  4264. 1
  4265. 1
  4266. 1
  4267. 1
  4268. 1
  4269. 1
  4270. 1
  4271. 1
  4272. 1
  4273. 1
  4274. 1
  4275. 1
  4276. 1
  4277. 1
  4278. 1
  4279. 1
  4280. 1
  4281. 1
  4282. 1
  4283. 1
  4284. 1
  4285. 1
  4286. 1
  4287. 1
  4288. 1
  4289. 1
  4290. 1
  4291. 1
  4292. 1
  4293. 1
  4294. 1
  4295. 1
  4296. 1
  4297. 1
  4298. 1
  4299. 1
  4300. 1
  4301. 1
  4302. 1
  4303. 1
  4304. 1
  4305. 1
  4306. 1
  4307. 1
  4308. 1
  4309. 1
  4310. 1
  4311. 1
  4312. 1
  4313. 1
  4314. 1
  4315. 1
  4316. 1
  4317. 1
  4318. 1
  4319. 1
  4320. 1
  4321. 1
  4322. 1
  4323. 1
  4324. 1
  4325. 1
  4326. 1
  4327. 1
  4328. 1
  4329. 1
  4330. 1
  4331. 1
  4332. 1
  4333. 1
  4334. 1
  4335. 1
  4336. 1
  4337. 1
  4338. 1
  4339. 1
  4340. 1
  4341. 1
  4342. 1
  4343. 1
  4344. 1
  4345. 1
  4346. 1
  4347. 1
  4348. 1
  4349. 1
  4350. 1
  4351. 1
  4352. 1
  4353. 1
  4354. 1
  4355. 1
  4356. 1
  4357. 1
  4358. 1
  4359. 1
  4360. 1
  4361. 1
  4362. 1
  4363. 1
  4364. 1
  4365. 1
  4366. 1
  4367. 1
  4368. 1
  4369. 1
  4370. 1
  4371. 1
  4372. 1
  4373. 1
  4374. 1
  4375. 1
  4376. 1
  4377. 1
  4378. 1
  4379. 1
  4380. 1
  4381. 1
  4382. 1
  4383. 1
  4384. 1
  4385. 1
  4386. 1
  4387. 1
  4388. 1
  4389. 1
  4390. 1
  4391. 1
  4392. 1
  4393. 1
  4394. 1
  4395. 1
  4396. 1
  4397. 1
  4398. 1
  4399. 1