Comments by "" (@manofsan) on "Real Royalty" channel.

  1. What actually happened is that after the 9/11 attacks unexpectedly occurred, the United States flooded troops into nearby Afghanistan, which is also on China's vulnerable western flank. Because of this unexpected arrival of the US military, a panicked China rushed to shore up its control over its western borders. They first assassinated Nepal's monarchy, and spread a cooked up story about murder-suicide which conveniently left no witnesses. China then clandestinely armed and supported Maoist guerrillas in Nepal to create a civil war there, similar to their strategy in Cambodia. They used this civil war to get Nepal's constitution re-written and even to re-arrange the distribution of power in the country to favour pro-China forces in Nepal. Now the previously stable Hindu kingdom of Nepal has suddenly and magically become China's client state.
    29
  2. What actually happened is that after the 9/11 attacks unexpectedly occurred, the United States flooded troops into nearby Afghanistan, which is also on China's vulnerable western flank. Because of this unexpected arrival of the US military, a panicked China rushed to shore up its control over its western borders. They first assassinated Nepal's monarchy, and spread a cooked up story about murder-suicide which conveniently left no witnesses. They then clandestinely armed and supported Maoist guerrillas in Nepal to create a civil war there. They used this civil war to get Nepal's constitution re-written and even to re-arrange the distribution of power in the country to favour pro-China forces in Nepal. Now the previously stable Hindu kingdom of Nepal has suddenly and magically become China's client state.
    17
  3. ​ @Gulshan Chaurasia - again, China is the one which had a sudden urgent need to control Nepal, due to their fear of US forces which had suddenly arrived near their vulnerable western flank. The events that followed in Nepal are very similar to Chinese tactics used against Cambodia, where they armed and supported guerrilla war. That's why peaceful Nepal suddenly experienced a very brutal guerrilla war led by Maoists.
    10
  4. ​ @Ravi Lama - oh really? You mean all the visits between Chinese ambassador & Oli are just for show? Stop lying your head off. China has its nose so far up Nepal's ass that it's coming out your mouth. Also look at China's latest intervention into Myanmar. It's right after meeting with China's envoy that Myanmar's generals did their coup. China also deployed some troops in the country, claiming to guard a pipeline that was important to them.
    10
  5. ​ @Aayush Thapa - I think you are pro-China communist, because you pretend China doesn't seek to control Nepal, which they do.
    8
  6. ​ @Ravi Lama - China would certainly gain from controlling areas west of its borders. China's new emphasis is westward push through Belt & Road, and China wants as much leverage as possible on its west. We can see all the meetings between China's ambassador and Oli. China is even responsible for military coup in Myanmar.
    7
  7. ​ @Ravi Lama - there's no reason for India to want Nepal's parliament dissolved, there's every reason for China to want it dissolved since there were moves in the parliament to oust Oli from power. Oli is China's puppet, and that's why he's attacking India all the time and constantly meeting with China's ambassador. Whole world sees that. Oli is a lifelong atheist, and not a Hindu. I'm an atheist myself, and I can certainly see what Oli's politics are. Communists like you will shamelessly argue that black is white and white is black.
    7
  8. ​ @Aayush Thapa - you can see China wants control over Nepal to crush Tibetans & Uighurs, and China also wants to create more leverage for itself on its western flank in order to pursue Belt & Road.The more China's power has grown, the more its arrogance has grown, along with its desire to control every one of its neighbors. You talk like a pro-Beijing communist puppet. Recognize that Han Chinese are not Himalayan people.
    7
  9. ​ @Ravi Lama - you line about China not giving a shit about Nepal is itself fallacious. China wants control over Nepal because it thinks Nepal could be used by Tibetans to undermine China's control over Tibet, and because it wants to use Nepal to undermine India as part of the pursuit of Belt & Road. This is glaringly obvious.
    6
  10. ​ @Sushil Subedi - from one side of your mouths, you communists claim that Oli is India's agent, and that all of Oli's anti-democratic actions (dissolving parliament, etc) are all on India's orders. Then from other side of your mouths you say that Oli is fighting with India because things India has done. You can't have it both ways, and we can see your kind will claim any new thing at any moment. India has not been encroaching on Nepal and has maintain a constant policy. It's Nepal's communists who have been hurting Terai people by re-writing the constitution to divide & oppress them. You're not a loyal Hindu, you're a Jaichand. You should change your name to a Chinese name, and ask them to put their boot on your neck like they do to Tibetans.
    5
  11. ​ @Ravi Lama - communist like you will forget his heritage and gladly sell his motherland to Han, no doubt. Jaichand mentality is strong in some people.
    4
  12. ​ @Sushil Subedi - just don't claim that Oli is working for India, because that's what many of you communists have been claiming, every time he does something crooked. We all know what the agreement was between Prachanda & Oli, no need to re-state the obvious. Oli is acting worse than an arrogant child - he is doing these tricks on the advice of China's ambassador, who is continually meeting with him to intervene in and orchestrate Nepal's affairs. You seem to leave out crucial details like this, instead choosing to blame India.
    4
  13. ​ @Sushil Subedi - China will never strike fuel deal, because China will never give anything for free, since they are brotherly with no one. India legitimately cut off traffic to border because India is not Nepal's stooge to be suffering betrayal by Nepal govt and fundamental threat to India's national security. China is a clear security threat to India, and if Nepal deals with China then they're backstabbing India (actually, they're even stabbing India in the front). You have to pick which side you want to be with - your traditional family, or predatory Han China which wants to destroy India. You can't running with the fox and hunting with the hounds. You have to either decide to be fraternal friend, or else an enemy. India cannot allow its security to be destroyed by predatory China and whosoever is crooked enough to get into bed with China. Your complete selfishness and shortsightedness will only leave you eaten alive by China, like they've done to Uighurs & Tibetans. Even Pakistan is gradually being enslaved by China through Debt Trap. It seems you want to share in their fate.
    4
  14. ​ @Ravi Lama - King was Hindu, and not a communist. China's goal is to bring neighboring states under its control and turn them into vassals. This was accelerated due to 9-11, and then later due to Belt & Road. Now with Xi having targeted India's border for attack, it's a sign that China is becoming even more aggressive on its western flank.
    3
  15.  @KV-db9gw  - it's the Maoists - they hated the royal family, and they're also backed by China.
    3
  16. ​ @Sushil Subedi - I'm well aware that Nepali Congress was in power. They too were taking advice from China at the time, and trying to appease the communist faction. If you are anti-India, then you are anti-Hindu. Nepali who is pro-China and anti-India is just a Jaichand. We supported Nepal like brothers all this time, but you want to be the black sheep who bites the rest of the family.
    3
  17. What actually happened is that after the 9/11 attacks unexpectedly occurred, the United States flooded troops into nearby Afghanistan, which is also on China's vulnerable western flank. Because of this unexpected arrival of the US military, a panicked China rushed to shore up its control over its western borders. They first assassinated Nepal's monarchy, and spread a cooked up story about murder-suicide which conveniently left no witnesses. They then clandestinely armed and supported Maoist guerrillas in Nepal to create a civil war there. They used this civil war to get Nepal's constitution re-written and even to re-arrange the distribution of power in the country to favour pro-China forces in Nepal. Now the previously stable Hindu kingdom of Nepal has suddenly and magically become China's client state.
    3
  18. ​ @Ayu Ca - I'm fine - it's the China apologists who are throwing fits
    2
  19. ​ @Anil Kc - Jaichand, how did you come to blame India for this? Jaichand like you will always only attack other Hindus, because that's what a treacherous Jaichand does. Your diseased mind has no rationality at all.
    2
  20.  @shahranhussain6037  - no, you'll have to dig through the facts yourself.
    2
  21.  @marcophoenix3221  - it's crazy to claim that India supports pro-China militants. India does not support pro-China forces.
    2
  22.  @marcophoenix3221  - your propaganda is so hollow that it looks lazy on your part. They're called Maoists for a reason - because they support Mao and his govt.
    2
  23. What actually happened is that after the 9/11 attacks unexpectedly occurred, the United States flooded troops into nearby Afghanistan, which is also on China's vulnerable western flank. Because of this unexpected arrival of the US military, a panicked China rushed to shore up its control over its western borders. They first assassinated Nepal's monarchy, and spread a cooked up story about murder-suicide which conveniently left no witnesses. They then clandestinely armed and supported Maoist guerrillas in Nepal to create a civil war there. They used this civil war to get Nepal's constitution re-written and even to re-arrange the distribution of power in the country to favour pro-China forces in Nepal. Now the previously stable Hindu kingdom of Nepal has suddenly and magically become China's client state.
    2
  24. ​ @Pradip Magar - Maoists don't care about human rights commissions, as they are lawless. The only thing they care about is the power of the gun.
    2
  25.  @godlessfan3701  then why they take Mao as their role model? Mao is not from India, he's Han Chinese. Only fools like you want to lick their boots. They're not even Himalayan people and see your as primitive.
    1
  26.  @godlessfan3701  - oh come on, what a ridiculous excuse. You really shred your credibility by spitting out such conspiracy theories.
    1
  27.  @pujansiwakoti113  - oh stop your ridiculous propaganda. Chinese ambassador meeting with Oli all the time, meeting with Nepal's president even, during all the govt maneuvering? Don't be ridiculous in your denials, as these only make you sound more foolish.
    1
  28. ​ @British ka pilla India - Rajiv Gandhi is not the best name to cite as an advocate of Hindus. Rajiv Gandhi's main advocacy was for himself and his family oligarchy.
    1
  29. ​ @British ka pilla India - no, you are security threat against Undivided Hindu Family. You want to create divisions, dissensions and distractions, for your own personally dishonest ends. This is why you have to be defeated.
    1
  30.  @54living  - you must be ChiCom
    1
  31.  @54living  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZulrE2BOsFM
    1
  32.  @seeesh1165  what do you tell us who/what you are?
    1
  33. ​ @Voice Out People - you are surely some kind of commie. You people are traitors.
    1
  34. ​ @Pradip Magar - but Maoist guerrilla war was right after 9-11-2001 and supported by China, which needed control over areas west of its own borders. That was the key development. Also in parallel to that, China suddenly created Shanghai Cooperative Organization, which was again arrayed against USA's new military presence in the region. So it's useless to pretend that China was unconcerned by sudden US arrival. Look at China's ambassador today, meeting with Oli all the time. Look at the timing of Myanmar military coup, happening right after their generals met with China's envoy. Look at China's entry into Sri Lanka as well.
    1
  35.  @pradipmagar6946  - I have family there. Are you a communist?
    1
  36. ​ @Pradip Magar - Maoists being there is different than them suddenly surging in power to mount an intense guerrilla war to overthrow the Nepalese state. And there's no reason why China wouldn't use Maoists in India as the easier route to supply the Maoists in Nepal. Furthermore, there was clear Chinese counseling to Nepalese authorities who re-drew Nepal's constitution to divide certain areas while unifying others. These changes were clearly made to benefit China's control over Nepal. When Oli & Co are also redrawing maps to increase border conflicts with India, then it's clearly obvious that China is behind this. You can duck away from these things all you want, but you're only blinding yourself to reality.
    1
  37. ​ @Pradip Magar - kalapani was a minor issue which Oli blew up under China's instigation. So let's not pretend that Oli is Indian agent -- he's clearly China's stooge.
    1
  38.  British ka pilla India  - you are commie propaganda
    1
  39. What actually happened is that after the 9/11 attacks unexpectedly occurred, the United States flooded troops into nearby Afghanistan, which is also on China's vulnerable western flank. Because of this unexpected arrival of the US military, a panicked China rushed to shore up its control over its western borders. They first assassinated Nepal's monarchy, and spread a cooked up story about murder-suicide which conveniently left no witnesses. China then clandestinely armed and supported Maoist guerrillas in Nepal to create a civil war there, similar to their strategy in Cambodia. They used this civil war to get Nepal's constitution re-written and even to re-arrange the distribution of power in the country to favour pro-China forces in Nepal. Now the previously stable Hindu kingdom of Nepal has suddenly and magically become China's client state.
    1