Comments by "" (@manofsan) on "VisualPolitik EN" channel.

  1. If Serbia's sovereignty and territorial integrity are violable for the purpose of separating Kosovo, then why isn't Kosovo's territorial integrity violable, for the purpose of separating the Serbian-majority portion of Kosovo? :body-blue-raised-arms:
    57
  2. I notice that the violent rioting erupted in Kazakhstan while Russia was in a faceoff against the West. How convenient for the West that this should coincidentally happen right now. Likewise, I remember how rioting conveniently erupted in Kiev to throw out the Yanuckovitch govt. Victoria Nuland, a US undersecretary was found to have been plotting the overthrow of the Yanuckovitch govt: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2XNN0Yt6D8 I find that the ability of Cold War hardliners in the US to play mischievous stunts to cause civil strife in other countries to be alarming. Likewise, as soon as US President Trump dared to demand that NATO countries pay their fair share, he was not only targeted with a campaign to oust him for being a stooge of Putin, but the US was suddenly plagued with non-stop ethnic rioting.
    5
  3. I don't see all Europeans automatically signing onto sanctions against China, in spite of China's military aggression on the border with India or its harassment of Taiwan. The problem with those like VisualPolitikEN is that they live in a Euro-centric bubble, and that's what guides their worldview.
    4
  4. If Serbia's sovereignty and territorial integrity are violable for the purpose of separating Kosovo, then why isn't Kosovo's territorial integrity violable, for the purpose of separating the Serbian-majority portion of Kosovo? :body-blue-raised-arms:
    4
  5. @8:58 - you say Serbia has sought to "destabilize" - uhh, that's your slanted take on it. When Americans show up in various parts of the world to destabilize them, then you won't use that word. Your use of the word "destabilize" is highly selective - and thus not credible at all. :goodvibes:
    3
  6. Nuclear sub is armed and nuclear. How would an opponent distinguish the way in which nuclear material on sub is being used? Is it going to have a giant barcode on top that satellites can read from space? Will UN inspectors be allowed to inspect the reactors on those subs to ensure the material hasn't been removed for bomb-making purposes? Give Me A F**king Break.
    3
  7. The US is also carrying out Regime Change in the region to set up its "alliance". Even NATO needs a Turkey as cannon-fodder. South Koreans and Japanese are running out of people too fast, while North Korea has suddenly become a lot stronger. Isn't proliferating nuclear technology for military use a violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty?
    3
  8. @8:58 - you say Serbia has sought to "destabilize" - uhh, that's your slanted take on it. When Americans show up in various parts of the world to destabilize them, then you won't use that word. Your use of the word "destabilize" is highly selective - and thus not credible at all.
    3
  9. I don't agree with the propaganda being pushed by the Cold War Brits on this channel. I notice that the violent rioting erupted in Kazakhstan while Russia was in a faceoff against the West. How convenient for the West that this should coincidentally happen right now. Likewise, I remember how rioting conveniently erupted in Kiev to throw out the Yanuckovitch govt. Victoria Nuland, a US undersecretary was found to have been plotting the overthrow of the Yanuckovitch govt: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2XNN0Yt6D8 I find that the ability of Cold War hardliners in the West to play mischievous stunts to cause civil strife in other countries to be alarming. Likewise, as soon as US President Trump dared to demand that NATO countries pay their fair share, he was not only targeted with a campaign to oust him for being a stooge of Putin, but the US was suddenly plagued with non-stop ethnic rioting.
    2
  10. Sounds like what Merkel once said: "Multi-kulti has failed"
    2
  11. ​ @Blondie - uhhh, the United States has sanctioned just about every country India has traditionally sourced oil from: Iran, Venezuela, now Russia. How about them mentioning these basic facts -- or do they expect India get get energy out of thin air? That's retarded.
    2
  12. Will this create problems between Seoul and Tokyo down the road? :cat-orange-whistling: Also, North Korea is not some idle spectator to all this -- they're busy building up nukes & missile delivery systems. Does a more militarized South Korea then further entrench Chinese & Russian support for Pyongyang? Given the notorious activism of South Korean students in opposing what they see as ColdWar-perpetuated division of the Korean peninsula, then what does South Korea's enhanced military role bode for domestic political stability in the country?
    2
  13. It's a self-feeding spiraling thing. The more lockdowns are imposed for whatever actual reason, the more negative economic impact these lockdowns have, which can in turn lead to more unrest.
    1
  14.  @chuningfeng5786  - not really, it's just resulting in endless impediments to China's economy, and hastening its downfall.
    1
  15. ​ @Free Trolling - where is Peng Shuai?
    1
  16. @13:26 - "nobody in Belgrade wants to see images again that are already part of the past" - the Brit presenter doesn't seem to understand that the dazed drunk Yeltsin is no longer in power. Therefore military assertion by KFOR, etc is unlikely to be able to repeat itself unchallenged. Let's remember that NATO was originally created as a defensive organization which was only supposed to fight on the soil of its member states. Obviously their invasion of Serbia set a precedent that totally changed the character of NATO. The fact is that NATO is now living on borrowed time, no matter how much the Deep State in Washington scrambles to save it.
    1
  17.  @davidgreen5994  - #cough#cough#Afghanistan#cough#cough
    1
  18. @15:49 - "much precious EU membership" -- tell that to Erdogan. His country was kept in perpetual waiting for a dangled bait of EU membership that never came. That only resulted in his country going its own way. That's a NATO member country, btw -- one which holds veto power over whether Sweden and Finland can join.
    1
  19.  @PresidentFlip  - bahaha - "pay no attention to me running away with pants around ankles -- it was all planned -- I meant to do that!" 🤣 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJXU7EVXs2A
    1
  20. ​ @PFlip -- heh, keep pretending, man: "you really think the US retreated from Vietnam? Hell, no -- the US actually won in Vietnam, but just let everyone believe they lost. All part of the secret master plan!" Strange how the well-executed plan left the Taliban with tens of billions of dollars in military hardware, which they now parade at every opportunity. Strange how all the women being flogged on the streets aren't feeling the brilliance of the plan. Guess they're not blonde and blue-eyed enough to know how to appreciate the brilliance.
    1
  21.  @PresidentFlip  - what your comments really tell me is that USA has a glass-half-full/glass-half-empty game going on towards Europe & Asia. America always tells Asians: "Sorry, gotta go! Not worth our time & effort!" but America meanwhile tells Europeans "We'll be here forever! You'll always be worth it!" This is why the US has gradually been ceding Asia to China, ever since Nixon & Kissinger decided to cosy up with Beijing against Moscow. Hell, Teddy Roosevelt even cosied up with Imperial Japan to take on Moscow -- and look how that blew up in everyone's face. It shows that the so-called brilliant strategizing just amounts to Fools Rushing In Where Wiser Men Fear to Tread.
    1
  22. Hydrogen is not a practical fuel for the economy. It's hard to store, it's a flammable gas, and it causes corrosion (hydrogen embrittlement) 🙄
    1
  23. @13:26 - "nobody in Belgrade wants to see images again that are already part of the past" - you don't seem to understand that the dazed drunk Yeltsin is no longer in power. Therefore military assertion by KFOR, etc is unlikely to be able to repeat itself unchallenged. Let's remember that NATO was originally created as a defensive organization which was only supposed to fight on the soil of its member states. Obviously their invasion of Serbia set a precedent that totally changed the character of NATO. The fact is that NATO is now living on borrowed time, no matter how much the Deep State in Washington scrambles to save it.
    1
  24.  @bogdanzivkovic8711  - because hypocrisy, that's why. Double standards are what geopolitics are all about.
    1