Comments by "" (@manofsan) on "Scott Manley"
channel.
-
38
-
29
-
13
-
13
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
:face-blue-smiling: ISRO personnel, including the current ISRO chairman, have given their explanation of what went wrong with the Chandrayaan-2 lander. They said that as the lander descended, the attitude deviations ("errors") began accumulating faster than expected, necessitating larger sharper corrections by the thrusters. At the same time, there was a bug in the software that manifested itself due to these larger sharper corrections being required. This software bug was not allowing for larger corrections by the thrusters beyond a certain amount. Had the attitude errors/corrections been smaller in size, then the software bug would not have been encountered, but because they were large enough, that software flaw came into play. Therefore the lander was unable to properly perform the required attitude corrections on the way down, causing the resulting crash. ISRO personnel refer to this problem as "dispersion" handling, meaning that those attitude errors/deviations were larger (ie. had a larger dispersion) than anticipated, which the software was unable to handle. That has now been corrected, along with other improvements and upgrades made to this Chandrayaan-3 lander.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1