Comments by "jeck jeck" (@jeckjeck3119) on "A Different Bias" channel.

  1. Is UK masochistic? How else would you explain Brexit.
    13
  2. Referandum was already done on this subject, no do over.
    5
  3.  @johnwormley5161  I'll take that as yes:/
    4
  4.  @Ardelanin  And? Break xt didn't have specifics either. No more referandumz. It's binding.
    3
  5.  @johnbriggs3916  According to Break xit erz, they are:/ So none should be held until EU one is.
    3
  6.  @JamesRoyceDawson  Just ask SA how good PR is.
    2
  7.  @thegoat11111  No. Re for Rm said referandum was binding, 2011 one even more so.
    2
  8.  @thomasreilly6362  Y have too much faith in the average British voterz, lol.
    2
  9. If reform is pro it then I'm against it. There was a referandum on 2011 about this, UK chose this system. And as Break xit people always say, referandums are magically super binding.
    2
  10. No, referandums are binding. 2011 one even more so.
    2
  11. ​ @johnwormley5161  Masochistic Brexist better not affect doctor who:/
    1
  12.  @tedteddington6223  I already answered that:/ Break Exit referandum had no specifics either, so no do overs:/
    1
  13.  @JohnPark-xf2gq  That's not the same:/ But I agree on the opinions part, they do change. Maybe in 50 years, we should do another referandum.
    1
  14. There already was a referendum in 2011, no election reform for UK.
    1
  15.  @diegoarmando5489  I will campaign against any, no referandum on voting until EU one done. The one in 2011 was more than enough.
    1
  16.  @andreimareilie9108  They are.
    1
  17.  @johnbriggs3916  Tell that to YT.
    1
  18.  @Heligoland360  Much like Break xit? There was no soft Break xit, no hard break it. Still binding.
    1
  19.  @fix0the0spade  Which is all the more reason why we should be malizusly compliant on this. Referaandum in 2011 is not to be question. Votmooanerz should not get what they want.
    1
  20.  @NLTops  Nope, Break seat vote was even less specific, but questioning it is not to be. So we should do the same with 2011 referandum. /
    1
  21.  @NLTops  Likes of farceage want it, so that is a reason enough to not want it,
    1
  22.  @NLTops  They made referandum a big deal, letting them go back on it is not an option.
    1
  23.  @chriswathen9612  True enough.
    1
  24.  @johnrobinson4445  I know, but them treating it as binding and now wanting to do it again on the issue they don't like is hypocritical, and should not be allowed. 2011 referandum is binding, why? F, farce age, that's why.
    1
  25.  @johnrobinson4445  They treated it as binding, we should do the same. They don't get to hypocrite now that the issue is something they kare for.
    1
  26.  @Boppy-B-B  Mandatory voting would fix that.
    1