Comments by "Cartoon Mo!" (@cartoonmo5976) on "" video.

@alonzoharris9049 You believe in 3 Al-Lahs minimum! 😂 🤣 🤣
12
@SamA-xu9gy The irony, you don't even know what your Al-Lah is, you admit it yourselves... You all claim Al-Lah's shape, what Al-Lah is, can't be compared to creation, or comprehended, this is a paradox, You don't know what Al-Lah is, can't describe Al-Lah, so wouldn't recognise Al-Lah if Al-Lah slapped you with Al-Lah's 2 right hands! So what do you actually believe in!?! 😂 🤣 🤣
10
@SamA-xu9gy You ask who is Jesus, NOT Isa that's who! 😂 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
8
Brothers and Sisters, please learn to state, that in the OT David isn't CALLED a prophet, only King, however, Acts 2:29-30 affirms he indeed is acknowledged as a Prophet, now, this works in our favour, because if the Quran is identifying David as a Prophet, and it doesn't mention this in the OT, then Acts has just been proven to be authentic by Quranic claimed standards, this proves the injil isn't just a single Gospel, it's at the very least the NT, but wait, 5:46-47 claims the injil contains the Torah, not a bit, not part, not quotations or references to, but the entire Torah, so, the injil now is proven to be the ENTIRE Bible, that means Paul has to be accepted by default, and if he's a messenger in the Quran, they can't reject him without rejecting all including Mad-ham-mu, and in the 7th century, as per, 5:46-47, that dictates our scripture in its entirety is declared to be authentic, and to be the foundation we're to judge by!...... Quran just destroyed itself, it authenticates our entire scripture, and our Scripture in turn exposes and busts Quran! What a beautiful ironic paradox the Quran has created for itself! 😂 🤣 Acts 2:29-30 Brothers, I can tell you with confidence that the patriarch David died and was buried, and his tomb is with us to this day. But he was a prophet and knew that God had promised him on oath that He would place one of his descendants on his throne.
4
Haha, well at least they'd learn that Al-Lah "prays FOR not TO" the "prophet"! 😂 🤣
4
@alonzoharris9049 You believe in 3 Al-Lahs, Al-Lah, Al-Lahs spirit, and the third is the human vessel/conduit that Al-Lah switches out each Quranic prophet/messenger!..... So you started with.... Al-Lah, Al-Lahs spirit, and Adam as the vessel/conduit to complete a Triunity, Then Adam is switched out upon death, and this process is claimed to be a perpetual rinse and repeat switch out process until you reach Mad-ham-mu, and he's meant to be the last vessel/conduit, So your Al-Lah after changing Al-Lah's nature each switch out with all Quranic prophets, including the 124,000, your Al-Lah is shirk central because Al-Lah has to keep associating Al-Lah with each vessel/conduit which expires, your Al-Lah has a partial expiry date, part of your Al-Lah is dead, This messed up warped Triunity ISN'T "THE" Trinity, in "THE" Trinity, there's no switch outs, Eternally, our God always WAS & always WILL be, the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit! If you don't accept this, then your Al-Lah is 3 Al-Lahs! Simple choice, 1 warped pagan Triune Al-Lah, or 3 seperate Al-Lahs, which is it!?! Why do you reject your Al-Lah/s!?! 😂 🤣
3
@bestKaffir.underTheSon Haha! Alonzo thinks Al-Lah being a single hypostatis makes Al-Lah a god, so we're all Al-Lahs now! 😂 🤣 🤣
3
@Rashed Alkaabi Go Read Jeremiah 3:1-2 and see what our God says about your pagan ritual in order for a woman to return to her husband!
2
@Yousef-r4t-h1h Even the bedouins questioned the perverted antics of your Mad-ham-mu, it wasn't normal or deemed acceptable as part of the bedouin/Arabian culture! Come on, answer, justify this conduct, and do you follow the Sunnah of your Mad-ham-mu, do what he did!?!
2
@Yousef-r4t-h1h Aww, what's the matter abdool, I don't see any sort of official rebuttal, response, refutation, answers! 😂 🤣
2
@Yousef-r4t-h1h Apology accepted! And respect where respect is due! Takes a real man to hold his hands up and admit if he's made a mistake!
2
mysotiras 015 Thanks, but I can't take credit, seriously, the inspiration that's flowed through me the last few days, only the Holy Spirit could've done it, so all Thanks to God Almighty! 🙏
2
@theoldone485 😂🤣🤣🤣
2
@theoldone485 Amen! God bless you and Peace of Christ be with you! 🙏
2
@daveanaru3038 I do humour him and give him all the attention the lonely little abdool desires!......He likes these interactions, makes him feel relevant, acknowledged, I can't deprive him and leave him feeling more lonely than he already does, and is, that wouldn't be nice! 😂 🤣 🤣
2
@Yousef-r4t-h1h Abdool, don't think you're going to be able to use fallacious Taqiyya sophistry with me, you're already exposed and busted as a liar!..... Now read and see, your cult is busted yet again!...... Jeremiah 3:1-2 “If a man divorces his wife and she leaves him to marry another, can he ever return to her? Would not such a land be completely defiled? But you have played the harlot with many lovers—and you would return to Me?” declares יְהֹוָֽה׃ (Yahweh). “Lift up your eyes to the barren heights and see. Is there any place where you have not been violated? You sat beside the highways waiting for your lovers, 👉like a כַּעֲרָבִ֖י👈 in the desert. 👉You have defiled the land with your prostitution and wickedness.👈 Strong's Exhaustive Concordance ka·‘ă·rā·ḇî - כַּעֲרָבִ֖י 6163. Arabiy Arabian Or marbiy {ar-bee'}; patrial from Arab; an Arabian or inhabitant of Arab (i.e. Arabia) -- Arabian. Hadiths: A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) was asked about a woman whom a man married and then divorced her, and then she married (another) person, and she was divorced before sexual intercourse with her, whether it was lawful for her first husband (to marry her in this state). He (the Holy Prophet) said: No, until he has tasted her sweetness. Sahih Muslim 1433 d In-book: Book 16, Hadith 132 USC-MSA web (English): Book 8, Hadith 3357 (deprecated) A'Asha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: A person divorced his wife by three pronouncements; then another person married her and he also divorced her without having sexual intercourse with her. Then the first husband of her intended to remarry her. It was about such a case that Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) was asked, whereupon he said: No, until the second one has tasted her sweetness as the first one had tasted. Sahih Muslim 1433 f In-book: Book 16, Hadith 134 USC-MSA web (English): Book 8, Hadith 3359 (deprecated) It was narrated from 'Aishah that a man divorced his wife three times and she married another husband who divorced her, before having intercourse with her. The Messenger of Allah was asked: "Is she permissible for the first (husband to remarry her)?" He said: "No, not until he tastes her sweetness as the first tasted her sweetness." Sahih (Darussalam) Sunan an-Nasa'i 3412 In-book: Book 27, Hadith 24 English translation: Vol. 4, Book 27, Hadith 3441 Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu'minin: The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) was asked about a man who divorced his wife three times, and she married another who entered upon her, but divorced her before having intercourse with her, whether she was lawful for the former husband. She said: The Prophet (ﷺ) replied: She is not lawful for the first (husband) until she tastes the honey of the other husband and he tastes her honey. Sahih (Al-Albani) Sunan Abi Dawud 2309 In-book: Book 13, Hadith 135 English translation: Book 12, Hadith 2302 It was narrated from Ibn 'Umar,: from the Prophet, concerning a man who had a wife then divorced her, then another man married her but divorced her before consummating the marriage. Could she go back to the first man? He said: "No, not until he tastes her sweetness." Sahih (Darussalam) Sunan Ibn Majah English: Vol. 3, Book 9, Hadith 1933 Arabic: Book 9, Hadith 2008 It was narrated that 'Aishah said: "The Messenger of Allah was asked about a man who divorced his wife, and she married another man who had a closed meeting with her then divorced her, before having intercourse with her. Is it permissible for her to remarry the first husband? The Messenger of Allah said: 'No, not until the second one tastes her sweetness and she tastes his sweetness.'" Da'if (Darussalam) Sunan an-Nasa'i 3407 In-book: Book 27, Hadith 19 English translation: Vol. 4, Book 27, Hadith 3436
1
@Yousef-r4t-h1h Wrong again abdool! You falsely accuse Lot, as a widower, as committing adultery, abfool, that means Mad-ham-mu is guilty for marrying Aisha after Khadija, and then all the other little girls he married, and learn what words mean by definition, Lot didn't commit adultery! 😂 🤣 Lot didn't commit anything, he was a victim, he didn't know what was happening, he was plied with alcohol, he was so drunk, to the point he was out of it, and this was all the planning of his daughters! Is Lot now his own daughters in order for your fallacy to stand, was his wife suddenly resurrected and returned to him!?! Busted abdool! Now, as for your dutty Mad-ham-mu, look at how he manipulated the divorce between Zaid his "son" and his "daughter in law" just so he could get a piece of that action! And still, you've failed to deal with the facts that bust your dutty stink cult! You're no man, you're a child, look at you, so ashamed, so embarrassed, and you don't even have the spine or cojones to stand by and defend your Mad-ham-mu or your cult! You all have the traits and behaviours of hyenas on heat! Now deal with your busted cult, stop trying to run abdool, because each time your try and deviate, avoid the busts, you only end up exposing your cult more, and the busts start building up against you! In short abdool, don't answer or refute, the points stand, they bust your cult, and as I'm exposing and busting your fallacies, that means our scripture and Christianity is defended, your cult is exposed and busted! So carry on, you're only making it worse for you and your cult, you're not smart, and you're not achieving anything via this hyena tactic and strategy! You're a failure just like your Mad-ham-mu! 😂 🤣 🤣 🤣
1
@Yousef-r4t-h1h Abdool, you've opened this can of worms, still want to go down this route, I've got more references I can post to expose and embarrass your Mad-ham-mu more!
1
mysotiras 015 Yeah, it's nothing more than a incoherent post it note scrapbook and ramblings of a madman, When you read it, it's evident it's the original Dawah script that was developing, Mad-ham-mu was just creating the quran as a script to debate like at a 7th century speakers corner, like today's abdools! 😂 🤣 🤣 🤣
1
@zakariaabdullah7270 Ask and ye shall receive!..... A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that there came a few desert Arabs to Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) and said: Do you kiss your children? He said: Yes. Thereupon they said: By Allah but we do not kiss our children. Thereupon Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said: Then what can I do if Allah has deprived you of mercy? Ibn Numair said: (We has deprived) your heart of mercy. حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ أَبِي شَيْبَةَ، وَأَبُو كُرَيْبٍ قَالاَ حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو أُسَامَةَ، وَابْنُ، نُمَيْرٍ عَنْ هِشَامٍ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ عَائِشَةَ، قَالَتْ قَدِمَ نَاسٌ مِنَ الأَعْرَابِ عَلَى رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَقَالُوا أَتُقَبِّلُونَ صِبْيَانَكُمْ فَقَالُوا نَعَمْ ‏.‏ فَقَالُوا لَكِنَّا وَاللَّهِ مَا نُقَبِّلُ ‏.‏ فَقَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏‏ وَأَمْلِكُ إِنْ كَانَ اللَّهُ نَزَعَ مِنْكُمُ الرَّحْمَةَ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ وَقَالَ ابْنُ نُمَيْرٍ ‏"‏ مِنْ قَلْبِكَ الرَّحْمَةَ ‏"‏ ‏.‏" Sahih Muslim 2317 In-book : Book 43, Hadith 85 USC-MSA web (English) : Book 30, Hadith 5735 (deprecated) Aishah (May Allah bepleased with her) reported: Some bedouins came to Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) and asked: "Do you kiss your children?" He said, "Yes". They then said: "By Allah, we do not kiss them." The Prophet (ﷺ) replied, "I cannot help you if Allah has snatched kindness from your hearts". وعن عائشة رضي الله عنها قالت‏:‏ قدم ناس من الأعراب على رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم، فقالوا ‏:‏ أتقبلون صبيانكم‏؟‏ فقال‏:‏ ‏‏نعم‏"‏ قالوا‏:‏ لكنا والله ما نقبل ‏!‏ فقال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏:‏ ‏"‏أو أملك إن كان الله نزع من قلوبكم الرحمة‏؟‏‏"‏ ‏(‏‏(‏متفق عليه‏)‏‏)‏ ‏.‏" [Al-Bukhari and Muslim]. Riyad us Saliheen Arabic/English book : Book 1, Hadith 226 We all know where Hassan used to be kissed, and Aisha was a child! And the bedouins are disputing it! As the saying goes.... "be careful what you wish for, you mught just get it!". 😂 🤣 🤣 🤣 Oh, and Mark 5:42 proves that even at the age of 12 a female is still a child!.....That alone proves that Aisha was a child, now show us where the Bible says to marry females at Aisha's age! Mark 5:42 Immediately 👉the girl👈 got up and began to walk around. 👉She was twelve years old👈, and at once they were utterly astounded. Aisha was literally half this girls age abdool!
1
@zakariaabdullah7270 As posted, your Mad-ham-mu also claimed the Hour was attached to his life/death, so unless the Hour has already occurred, that's your Mad-ham-mu busted as a fraud! 😂 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
1
@zakariaabdullah7270 Haha, women with heads like humps of camels isn't a fulfilled prophecy based on the hijab and girls hair styling underneath, hair, Hijab, isn't the head, the skull is the head! 😂 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
1
@zakariaabdullah7270 Your Mad-ham-mu claimed we're Nasara, want to prove that we're all from Nazareth, the Arab Christians weren't, we're not, so, try proving that! Oh, unless you want to go for the heretical Nasara who rejected the Gospels and Jesus as the Son of God, but accepted only the Torah and the virgin birth, which contradicts the Quranic narrative, So, which is it!?! 😂 🤣 🤣 🤣
1
@zakariaabdullah7270 You seriously need a Hadith to explain that the human head is the skull not hair and a Hijab, Well, it's easily proven, do you wear a Hijab, are we all born with a Hijab head, are out heads made completely of hair!?!.... Bring one medical science academic that makes or has made such a ludicrous claim, and you're in about Hadiths, this is simple common knowledge fact, even kids know that a head isn't a Hijab and hair, it's your skull💀! 😂 🤣 🤣 🤣
1
@alonzoharris9049 Your Al-Lah is Triune! 😂 🤣 🤣
1
@zakariaabdullah7270 I'm not changing topic, you're the one waffling on about prophesies of Mad-ham-mu, well don't you believe the Quran to be prophetic, are you claiming otherwise now via your discrepancy!?! 😂
1
@zakariaabdullah7270 Well that's interesting considering ibn kathir 3:56 affirms our scripture, Christianity, and even our early Church fathers as being on the true correct path for up to 300 years, and 7th century even 5:46-47 affirms in its claims that the injil is meant to be our scripture, that our scripture is authentic, so much so we're to judge by it as an authority, and that the injil is the entire Bible including Paul! Furthermore, the injil, being sent with Isa, is present at the time of Moses in 7:155-157!..... Wan to now prove that an injil existed at that time, and that Jesus, if meant to be Isa, was incarnate at the time of Moses!.... Or how about the copy Waraqa was translating from, or Waraqa's translation from the 7th century!.... You're the one making the claim, burden of proof is on you now!.... And can you provide the verse where it states Al-Lah is tawheed!?! 😂 🤣 🤣 Can you provide the verse where it mentions Yasue Al-Masih!?! Can you provide the verse where it says Christian!?! Can you provide the Torah verse where it states explicitly the name Ahmad!?! You really don't want to play this game with me abdool, no matter where you try and run to on your script, heard it, exposed, or, refuted, it, answered it! Pity for you lot that none of you lot can do the same, none of you can even engage with Christian Theology with our scripture to build any sort of case against it, all you've got are fallacies upon fallacies, which exposes the fear and desperation you all suffer with because your cult is such an embarrasing and shameful shambles of a cult, it's indefensible, that's why you all try to dive answering a single question, especially when your opponent clearly knows what they're talking about, know your cult better than you! 😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
1
@zakariaabdullah7270 Watch how quick I wipe that pagan smile off of your face! 😂 3:56 Tafseer of the Great Qur’an / Ibn Katheer (d. 774 AH) is classified and verified 👉Al-Lah recounted their articles in the Qur’an, and he responded to each group, so they continued to do so close to 👉three hundred years👈, then a king of the Greek kings called Constantine emerged for them, he entered the religion of Christianity, a trick was said to corrupt him, because he was a philosopher, and it was said that he was ignorant. He changed the religion of Christ for them and perverted it, added to it and decreased it, and laid down laws for him, and the loyal secretariat which is a low (vile) betrayal, and pork was permissible in his time, and they prayed for him to the east, and they drew for him churches, temples and hermatiges, and increased their fasting ten days for a sin they claim he committed. And the religion of Christ became the religion of Constantine, except that he built for them more than twelve thousand temples, churches, hermitages, and courtyards, and he built the city attributed to him, and the royal sect of them followed him, تفسير تفسير القرآن العظيم/ ابن كثير (ت 774 هـ) مصنف و مدقق وقد حكى الله مقالاتهم في القرآن، ورد على كل فريق، فاستمروا على ذلك قريباً من ثلثمائة سنة، ثم نبغ لهم ملك من ملوك اليونان يقال له قسطنطين، فدخل في دين النصرانية، قيل حيلة ليفسده، فإنه كان فيلسوفاً، وقيل جهلاً منه، إلا أنه بدل لهم دين المسيح وحرفه، وزاد فيه ونقص منه، ووضعت له القوانين، والأمانة الكبرى التي هي الخيانة الحقيرة، وأحل في زمانه لحم الخنزير، وصلوا له إلى المشرق، وصوروا له الكنائس والمعابد والصوامع، وزادوا في صيامهم عشرة أيام من أجل ذنب ارتكبه فيما يزعمون، وصار دين المسيح دين قسطنطين إلا أنه بنى لهم من الكنائس والمعابد والصوامع والديارات ما يزيد على اثني عشر ألف معبد، وبنى المدينة المنسوبة إليه، واتبعه الطائفة الملكية منهم، The first complete copies of single New Testament books appear around 200CE. If we're to go by Ibn Kathir's claim, then the manuscripts that are dated during/around the time of Constantine I are 1 & 2 Timothy, 1 & 2 Peter, 2 & 3 John, and Jude. Even if we were to ignore these parts of the NT, it wouldn't change the doctrine, belief, faith, that Jesus is the Son of God, came in the flesh, was Crucified for our sins, resurrected on the 3rd day, and declared He is Yahweh, the Son of Yahweh (God)!....As supported by early church fathers, whose writings too, pre date Constantine I! Constantine I converted to Christianity on his deathbed in 337CE! The legalisation of Christianity, sanctioning of building churches, the start of the Ecumenical Councils, all happened before his conversion!
1
@zakariaabdullah7270 And regardless, abdool, 5:46-47 if you believe your cults claims, it dictates that our scripture is authentic, but it also, claims it's from the time of Moses in 7:155-157, PROVE IT! 😂 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
1
@zakariaabdullah7270 You've just agreed with me abdool, if our scripture, in 7th century, we're to judge by it, our scripture pre dates 7th century, therefore it's our scripture we have today, which we had during, which we had before, the 7th century! And dont try and strawman me you little ignoramus, I never said its the NT, what, you think the entire Bible is now the NT, I said "INJIL IS THE ENTIRE BIBLE ONCLUDING PAUL" And 5:46 Proves it because it states that this injil contains the Torah, not a bit, not part, THE TORAH, as in the entire Torah, I challenge you to, show me the Torah in the entire NT, nay Gospel!... I don't even think you know what the Torah is, that's why you can't tell us where ahmad is meant to be mentioned! 😂 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
1
@zakariaabdullah7270 Simple questions: 7:155 who gathers 70 of his people!?! 7:156 who does Al-Lah respond to!?! What is a hyphen and a semi colon and what are their functions seen as they're used as the main punctuation at the end of 7:156 7:157 states Torah and injil, wherever the injil is, Isa is, that's what your Quran claims! Have fun abdool, Hamza from speakers corner ran away from this too, couldn't answer/refute it! 😂 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
1
@zakariaabdullah7270 If that's the case, then what are the signs mentioned at the end of 7:156, did Al-Lah forget to divulge this information!?!....Go on, tell me, where does Al-Lah go through the signs Al-Lah is referring to in 7:156!?! 😂 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 You shouldn't judge me by your own Ignorance, you'll end up embarrassing yourself doing that, because I actually do my research be for I speak!
1
@zakariaabdullah7270 Wrong! The canonisation of our scripture pre dates 7th century, so if you're claiming that these Nasara had their own injil, then they're not us, and their scripture is rejected by us then as it is today, they'd be heretics, But you all claim they're us, and that the injil is our scripture, so your Taqiyya has now created a problematic for you paradox! You're in a catch 22, if not our scripture, if they're heretics, they're not us and that's not our scripture! If meant to be us, our scripture, the name we're called is an error! If us and our scripture, the it, they, and Isa by default are from the wrong time period thanks to 7:155-157, which I'm waiting for your response, but I've checked everything, I'm right any discrepancy on your part I will expose and refute! 😂 🤣
1
@zakariaabdullah7270 Even ibn Taymiyyah... Al-Jawab As-Sahih Sheikh ul-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah Affirms we have the Truth, preserved, it's our interpretation of the text, not the text itself that's questioned! 😂 🤣 🤣
1
@meraki007 Bacon rasher Alkaabi just got bbbbusted!!! 😂 🤣 🤣
1
@asseradel7698 A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: When the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) was commanded to give option to his wives, he started it from me saying: I am going to mention to you a matter which you should not (decide) in haste until you have consulted your parents.👉She said that he already knew that my parents would never allow me to seek separation from him👈 She said: Then he said: Allah, the Exalted and Glorious, said: Prophet, say to thy wives: If you desire this world's life and its adornment, then come, I will give you a provision and allow you to depart a goodly departing; and if you desire Allah and His Messenger and the abode of the Hereafter, then Allah has prepared for the doers of good among you a great reward She is reported to have said: About what should I consult my parents, for I desire Allah and His Messenger and the abode of the Hereafter? She ('A'isha) said: Then all the wives of Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) did as I had done. وَحَدَّثَنِي أَبُو الطَّاهِرِ، حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ وَهْبٍ، ح وَحَدَّثَنِي حَرْمَلَةُ بْنُ يَحْيَى التُّجِيبِيُّ، - وَاللَّفْظُ لَهُ - أَخْبَرَنَا عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ وَهْبٍ، أَخْبَرَنِي يُونُسُ بْنُ يَزِيدَ، عَنِ ابْنِ شِهَابٍ، أَخْبَرَنِي أَبُو سَلَمَةَ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ عَوْفٍ، أَنَّ عَائِشَةَ، قَالَتْ لَمَّا أُمِرَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم بِتَخْيِيرِ أَزْوَاجِهِ بَدَأَ بِي فَقَالَ ‏"‏ إِنِّي ذَاكِرٌ لَكِ أَمْرًا فَلاَ عَلَيْكِ أَنْ لاَ تَعْجَلِي حَتَّى تَسْتَأْمِرِي أَبَوَيْكِ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ قَالَتْ قَدْ عَلِمَ أَنَّ أَبَوَىَّ لَمْ يَكُونَا لِيَأْمُرَانِي بِفِرَاقِهِ قَالَتْ ثُمَّ قَالَ ‏"‏ إِنَّ اللَّهَ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ قَالَ ‏{‏ يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ قُلْ لأَزْوَاجِكَ إِنْ كُنْتُنَّ تُرِدْنَ الْحَيَاةَ الدُّنْيَا وَزِينَتَهَا فَتَعَالَيْنَ أُمَتِّعْكُنَّ وَأُسَرِّحْكُنَّ سَرَاحًا جَمِيلاً * وَإِنْ كُنْتُنَّ تُرِدْنَ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ وَالدَّارَ الآخِرَةَ فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ أَعَدَّ لِلْمُحْسِنَاتِ مِنْكُنَّ أَجْرًا عَظِيمًا‏}‏ قَالَتْ فَقُلْتُ فِي أَىِّ هَذَا أَسْتَأْمِرُ أَبَوَىَّ فَإِنِّي أُرِيدُ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ وَالدَّارَ الآخِرَةَ ‏.‏ قَالَتْ ثُمَّ فَعَلَ أَزْوَاجُ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم مِثْلَ مَا فَعَلْتُ ‏.‏ Reference: Sahih Muslim 1475 In-book reference: Book 18, Hadith 30 USC-MSA web (English) reference: Book 9, Hadith 3498 (deprecated numbering scheme)
1
@SamA-xu9gy You've just exposed and proven your ignorant ultracrepidarianism, you don't know Jack diddly squat about Jesus Christ, the Crucifixion, Christianity, our scripture! And you rely on a limited black stone, that's no longer stone but a few pebbledash fragments to absolve your sins! And you say there's no sin in jannah on the basis that you can sin and there's no resolvement/absolving of sin because it's claimed to become exempt! So sharia being Al-Lah's law, Al-Lah changes Al-Lah's laws and is fickle! But also, because the sins in jannah are still sins, the exemption doesn't change that fact, Where's your unlimited to resolve/absolve sin!?! Remember, with an exemption in place, Al-Lah by default can't forgive sin becUe the sin is exempt, but the sin is still present via your sinful acts in jannah! 😂 🤣
1
Your Al-Lah claims to be Triune, Al-Lah doesn't know what Al-Lah is, and based on your logic this dictates you worship 3 Al-Lahs and you don't even realise it! 😂 🤣 🤣 🤣
1