Comments by "Cartoon Mo!" (@cartoonmo5976) on "Farid Responds Can't Show 1 Muslim Scholar" video.

  1.  @northstar1690  Don't try and strawman my response! That was clearly/evidently an example in regards to the context of the text!.... Go on, quote where I said the text stated specific ages, and it was referring to those specific ages! Your response offers nada to refute my response! Prove a plant naturally flowers before it's mature, can a man/woman produce pollen/be pollinated before they're mature enough to produce pollen and be able to be pollinated by the pollen, if you can't then you're exposed and refuted!?!! And 1 Corinthians 7:38 still refutes you regardless!
    4
  2.  @AlonzoHarris235  Interacting with the likes of you is like us wearing beautifully stitched silk, you claim you're wearing either the same or finer, and then when we point out you're actually wearing a poorly stitched sackcloth and one tug on a multitude of loose threads cause the sackcloth to fall apart you run still claiming you're wearing the same or finer! 😂🤣
    4
  3.  @northstar1690  You don't know Jack diddly squat about plants!.... A male plant flowers once mature in order to release pollen to pollinate female plants! A female plant flowers in order to be pollinated, because the plant is mature enough to produce offspring (seeds (children))! The verse/translation states, "passing the flower of her age", this dictates no longer being in her prime, like say at 40 you wouldn't be in your prime like when you were 20, The fact the "flower" would be referred to as a virgin, meaning untouched by man, this is irrelevant in regards to age/maturity, so the verse is stating that if a mature woman who has remained chaste but is past her prime and she/a man wish to marry, then there's no sin in doing so!.... So, Nature has just exposed and refuted you! As does 1 Corinthians 7:38! Now, 4:3 & 65:4 are explicitly clear, 4:3 uses the Arabic word for children!
    3
  4. FAO Farid!... Al-Jawab As-Sahih Sheikh ul-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah Ibn Kathir Tafsir (Arabic) 3:56 Al-Lah recounted their articles in the Qur’an, and he responded to each group, so they continued to do so close to three hundred years, وقد حكى الله مقالاتهم في القرآن، ورد على كل فريق، فاستمروا على ذلك قريباً من ثلثمائة سنة، Farid, your scholars not only affirm the preservation of our Scripture, but also the Disciples/Apostles, and the early Churchfathers, which by default affirms and authenticates their publications/works, aswel as Christianity! Now, here's what I want you (Farid) to prove to me/us...... Prove that Jesus Christ, Incarnate, with a book called injil, and all the Prophets before His Incarnation, along with Christians, were all around during the time of Moses (7:155-157)! Show us a single Christian Scholar who've ever made that claim!
    3
  5.  @northstar1690   You don't know Jack diddly squat about plants!.... A male plant flowers in order to release pollen to pollinate female plants! A female plant flowers in order to be pollinated, because the plant is mature enough to produce offspring (seeds (children))! The verse/translation states, "passing the flower of her age", this dictates no longer being in her prime, like say at 40 you wouldn't be in your prime like when you were 20, The fact the "flower" would be referred to as a virgin, meaning untouched by man, this is irrelevant in regards to age/maturity, so the verse is stating that if a mature woman who has remained chaste but is past her prime and a she/a man wish to marry, then there's no sin in doing so!.... So nature has just exposed and busted your fallaciousness, ignorance, and ultracrepidarianism as does 1 Corinthians 7:38 exposes and refutes your fallacy! Now, 4:3 & 65:4 are explicitly clear, you can marry "orphans", and before you try it, yes, the Arabic uses the word for the prepubescent!
    1
  6.  @northstar1690  Glad you acknowledge Jesus is our God, not your Nanna god (6:78)! And regarding Numbers 31, do you really think you can come here and regurgitate the same old Dawah script and succeed, go on, let's hear/read your point so we can refute it yet again. 😂🤣
    1
  7.  @AlonzoHarris235  Oh really Alonzo, the evidence proves different!..... Ask any of my brothers and sisters here if they agree with me that we are more than happy to discuss every single part of our scripture, answer any and all questions, and if we can't, direct/refer someone to where best obtain the answers they seek, because our God, our doctrine, our Scripture Commands and dictates we do so!.... Go on, try and deny we're Commanded to preach, to study our Scripture in order that we can correctly preach, and answer questions! It's you lot that run from your own book/sources, doctrine, questions, points/claims!.... And now, you and I can put this to the test, I'm the Christian, and I'm right here ready to go, let's see if you're ready, actually can stand your ground!.... Ready!?!
    1
  8.  @northstar1690   So hold on!..... You're claiming that Deuteronomy 21:10-11 is our God Commanding/Speaking!?!😂🤣🤣......... "Matthew Henry Commentary By this law a soldier is allowed to marry his captive if he pleased. For the hardness of their hearts Moses gave them this permission, lest, if they had not had liberty given them to marry such, they should have taken liberty to defile themselves with them, and by such wickedness the camp would have been troubled." And your response dictates that if a god, or a claimed prophet made/implemented such laws/commands as you described, would be unacceptable today, as much as the 7th century, as much as the time of Moses because you're disputing the law during Moses' time! Three words for you!..... Right hand possession!..... You've just exposed and rejected your own god, leader, cult, doctrine, and book! Well done, can you say "apostate is me!". 😂🤣
    1
  9.  @northstar1690  I've interacted with others from your collective who believe exactly the same as you, you think and impose your cult logic on our scripture, you think every single word in our scripture is literally spoken by our God and think it was then written down, or sent down ready written by our God! 😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    1
  10.  @northstar1690  That has got absolutely nothing to do with my comment! Now you say the quran honours all the prophets of Al-Lah, and then claim it clears all the prophets of Al-Lah from what's attributed to them in our Scripture...... Interesting!...... Show me one single Prophet from the Bible that's mentioned in both the quran and Bible as a prophet of Nanna (6:78)! Show me one single verse in the quran that mentions Jesus Christ/Yahweh! And 22:52 actually dictates and necessitates that all the prophets of Al-Lah were misguided, and the same verse contradicts 39:37, and that triggers 4:82! So, your quran not only defeats itself, but also it condemns all its claimed prophets! Oh, and it doesn't honour all prophets, can you provide the names, provide the scriptures, and which prophet went to which nation in regards to the claimed 124,000, and does the 124,000 include the named prophets in the quran, or are they in addition to the 124,000!?! 🤔
    1