Comments by "Cartoon Mo!" (@cartoonmo5976) on "Shutting down bankrupt Dawah Script | ft. Matthew, Chris \u0026 Usman | Speakers' Corner debate" video.

Brothers & Sisters, regarding the Trinity, & the abdools fallacies, just ask them, can they/to define the words "Tri" & "Unity", the question instantly decimates their fallacies & exposes Al-Lah's Tawheed proving Al-Lah is a plurality, but not Triune!....... Definition of Tri - a combining form meaning “three” tri-(word root) three Definition of Unity - the quality or state of not being multiple: ONENESS the quality or state of being one: UNIFICATION A totality of related parts: an entity that is a complex or systematic whole See! That's how easy it is to decimate their fallacies! 😂 🤣
11
@michaelknight6732 Hahaha! You can't dispute or refute the definitions! Your Da'if fallacies are buried 6ft deep, Night night!! 😂 🤣 🤣
5
@zicozico6961 Naik wouldn't last 1 round against me! Go tell him I'm right here, ready and waiting! 😂 🤣
4
@michaelknight6732 How can a person be a part when a person is a person!?! Don't try playing symantics with me abdool! 😂 🤣 In regards to the trinity it dictates totality of related persons as a whole! 😂 🤣
3
@zicozico6961 Al-Lah isn't self sufficient, Al-Lah is reliant on creation! 😂 🤣 And there's no Jesus Christ in the Quran, not by Name, not by Tribe, and not by time period! I challenge you, show me one single Quran verse stating Yasue Al-Masih! 😂
3
@michaelknight6732 Furthermore the definition includes unification aka oneness, tawheed is defined as unification, oneness, so what and how many ?'s are unified in order for Al-Lah to be a oneness, one Al-Lah!?! You're busted abdool! 😂 🤣
3
@michaelknight6732 The definition is in a general context not a Theological or Philosophical context, and to claim otherwise dictates that the attributes you claim are unified, are seperate parts of Al-Lah, so your fallacy dictates you have 99 Al-Lah's, each attribute is an Al-Lah as you say an Al-Lah is attribute this, an Al-Lah is attribute that! 😂 🤣 I never said a person is a part, go back and read my response again abdool, I said in the context of the trinity the word is person in place of the word part! Your fallacy completely backfires! Here, we'll go with the definition of a person, Al-Lah is a person, but a person is human, so Al-Lah now has to be a human nature by definition! Person definition: A person (plural people or persons) is a being that has certain capacities or attributes such as reason, morality, consciousness or self-consciousness, and being a part of a culturally established form of social relations such as kinship, ownership of property, or legal responsibility. A living human. Often used in combination.... An individual of specified character. The composite of characteristics that make up an individual personality; the self. Busted! 😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
3
@michaelknight6732 You can try playing with this as much as you like, end of the day, your fallacy will result in the dictation that you have multiple Al-Lah's! 😂 🤣
3
@michaelknight6732 So you admit that your entire discrepancy and argument is fallacious when the definitions, as I've already stated, are generalised context not Theological or Philosophical in regards to what the definition of the word/s and definitions of the word/s "Tri", "Unity", "Triune", "Triunity", which is descriptive of what God is! You've just exposed and decimated your entire fallacious point! Game over! 😂 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
3
@michaelknight6732 Now if you want to do Theological and Philosophical, well, you say you have attributes, and Al-Lah has attributes, are your attributes attributes that make your nature human nature, and are Al-Lah's attributes attributes that make Al-Lah's nature divine?! You know where this is going!.... And you're busted, again! 😂 🤣
3
@Christian-Roots818 Haha, I wonder if they'd like ham sandwiches for their packed lunch! 🤔
3
@michaelknight6732 And whilst trying to play smart, you've just busted yourself! So you admit that your attributes are human in nature, Now as we all have these human attributes regardless of how many we are as persons and minds, these attributes are what define us as humans, they are our nature, aka human nature, but the attributes of Al-Lah, regardless of their multiplicity, are unified in one divine nature, and there's only one divine nature, and that nature can apply to any number of persons and/or minds as the nature isn't defined by the number of minds or persons! So the Trinity being 3 Hypostasis (persons), unified by 1 Divine nature, and that Divine nature being understood by both you and I as being only attributed and affiliated with God, God being Triune means God is 1 regardless of the number of persons and minds! So everything I've stated is in full agreement with the entirety of Christianity! 😂 🤣 🤣
2
@johnzuma4688 Haha, when say bring him to me, he can come on here, I di t need the abdool physically near me, I'd be soaked in spit! 😂 🤣
2
@michaelknight6732 Do you believe as jake the fake Taqiyyaphysician claimed when misquoting Gregory Palamas, that the Faculty of Knowing means the faculty of acting and doing!?! 😂 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
2
Sam Oulton Haha, I've been asking for the verse where it states Yasue Al-Masih because Isa is Esau in Arabic, is from Levi not Judah, and a nephew of Musa during the time of Moses (19:28, 66:12 & 7:155-157)!?! In short, Isa has the wrong name, is from the wrong tribe, and time period, which by default proves the injil can't be, and never was, our scripture, unless the abdools can provide evidence to prove the above claims!.....And we all know they can't, and their Al-Lah, Quran, and their pagan Sabian butt munch are all busted! 😂 🤣
1
@michaelknight6732 Hahaha! Look at how desperate you are, my whole point is that God is triune and you claim I'm not a trinitarian! That's parodoxical! 😂 🤣
1
@michaelknight6732 Haha! I fully acknowledged and exposed your entire argument as fallacious, including your question, which I'll address and expose as another fallacy,..... I never said Jesus christ was an attribute, you're the one appealing to the attributes of Al-Lah! I never said Jesus is a part, I exposed your fallacy on that ground and basis as the definition used is a general not Theological/Philosophical context! Haha, you're doing more fallacious circumabulations Than you do around your pagan cube! 😂 🤣 🤣
1
@michaelknight6732 Wrong, the Divine Nature of God is one Divine Nature, and that Divine Nature is the one and same Divine Nature that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit have! Your fallacy dictates now that each of Al-Lah's attributes is an independant Divine Nature, so you now have 99 Al-Lah's! Oh dear, didn't really think your fallacy through did you! 😂 🤣 🤣
1
@michaelknight6732 What has my God having attributes got to do with the Faculty of Knowing, oh that's right, nada, zip! Now answer my question, do you agree with Jake the fake Taqiyyaphysician, that you believe the Faculty of Knowing is the same as the faculty of doing and acting!?! Here, I'll help you out, no, they're not one and the same thing! If I claimed the Faculty of Knowing I can eternally expose your cult, unless I do the physical act of exposing your cult eternally, then I cannot claim to be eternally exposing your cult, but your Al-Lah claims to be eternally creating, which isnt Faculty of Knowing, that's actually doing the act based on the faculty of Knowing! Get it, see how jake the fake Taqiyyaphysician got himself busted when he tried to step to Bob! And Bob was correct in his understanding and responses! Your Fakey Flakey Jakey wouldn't be able to handle me! 😂 🤣
1
@johnzuma4688 Haha, yeah, the evident proof is the fact that he could get a much larger audience on here, it should be his name that would draw the crowds in, so his cop out excuse actually means he's admitting that his name isn't worthy enough to draw in the masses, he's dependant on his opponents popularity over his own! 😂 🤣 🤣 🤣
1
@michaelknight6732 I refer you to my previous response, which answers your question, using exactly what you're claiming to appeal to, and it fully supports and agrees with everything I've stated, and simultaneously refutes your fallacies! You're now scared and running because you know you've made a claim and now it's all exposed and backfired! 😂 🤣 🤣
1
@michaelknight6732 And remember, this is my comment and thread you're in, so you're boosting my comment/thread now, not yours! 😂 🤣 🤣 🤣
1
@michaelknight6732 The Christian Orthodox criteria you're appealing to, and I've provided in detail, exposes and refutes you, and to claim that Divine Nature is meaningless dictates that Al-Lah is meaningless, and Al-Lah can't be a god of any sort, because Al-Lah doesn't have a Divine Nature! 😂 🤣 🤣 🤣 It's evident you haven't read the response, you're too scared to, because you know when I say you're busted, you are busted! 😂🤣🤣🤣🤣 Go on, run if you want to little boy, it's evident you can't cope with the spanking! 😂 🤣 🤣
1
Christian Grinch The Skype Schala Where does it even mention Jesus in the Quran, where does it state anywhere Yasue Al-Masih!?! Who is Isa/Esau the Levite son of Maryam, nephew of Moses, no such individual is mentioned in the entire Bible, can't be Jesus Christ, wrong Name, tribe, and time! 😂 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
1