Comments by "nozrep" (@nozrep) on "World of Antiquity" channel.

  1. i dunno if Carlson’s right but I sure do enjoy listening to him and his theories. And I am pretty sure he does not claim to “right” beyond a shadow of a doubt. Pretty sure he is always open to counter criticism on his counter-theories that go against the mainstream. That’s the vibe I’ve always gotten from him.
    55
  2. i love Randall Carlson’s work and theories. I also enjoy this guy. Just discovered him a couple weeks ago.
    16
  3. real science employs the scientific method and constantly tests and retests and questions everything
    9
  4. or also just deforested a lot in general because they needed the timbers for the millions of population in the whole Roman empire that needed housing. well i guess they also had mud brick for that though. definitely does not have to be just for mining and smelting although it could be another reason for deforestations. Besides, the Roman army was quite well known for being engineers and had a whole standardized system for marching to a place to conquer, stopping to set up camp, and building a huge camp or small town out of all the woods around them instead of just using tents the whole time. so there is that also. many reasons for deforestation of course which, smelting and mining could be but one of those many reasons.
    4
  5. bet he ain’t gonna defend flint dibble or attack dedunking anymore. 😂 after hancock releasing his video completely exposing all of dibble’s lies. oh who am i kidding. it’s not like any of them are gonna say sorry and change their slimy ways of doing things or their air of academic superiority
    3
  6. 18:20; how can ancient history matter if people like this guy attack and defame interested individuals who he happens to disagree with who simply offer new theories and do not actually claim things are facts? eg, Hancock.
    2
  7. which anime is this? i want to watch!
    2
  8. why do people mischaracterize an alternative theory as an outright dismissal? An alternative theory to other theories about theories, even. Debunker guy does not actually dismiss things that are proven by the existence of primary documents.
    2
  9. oh yes i love Nebraska😅
    1
  10. unless it is not a fact and or not simple, e.g., a lie
    1
  11. it’s flip flops dontcha knowuhhh. them space technology ones😅
    1
  12. maybe there’s an ancient China king that could’ve read also but i suppose it’d be more difficult to figure out if one’s historical expertise is not that category of history
    1
  13. yay youtube drama for the views and clicks! good job, phd guy. this guy is beneath you. you needn’t have even made a video he’s so far underneath you. lolz.
    1
  14. it appears that this channel maker does not understand the Rogan and Hancock are very much still friends
    1
  15. atheists don’t need no stinkin BC what are you talking about? who cares if before present era still is based on the approximate date that Jesus was born. hahaha i love it i love it i love it. Ohhh but wait Jesus “didn’t exist” they base it on some arbitrary point in the Roman period that happens to align with all of the primary sources surrounding and pointing to some weird cult in Israel that turned into a primary global religion and omg omg omg, still is. I just love atheists and agnostics
    1
  16. lol🤣 he sayin’ Randall’s wrong. For some, them’s fightin’ words!
    1
  17. it was probably ancient high technology that killed him😅
    1
  18. doesn’t necessarily need to have an impact crater. e.g., naturally occurring air bursts exist, caused by meteors burning up in the atmosphere. there’s videos of them happening in the youtube internet era. I think the famous one i am thinking of is from russia or something. anyways. i don’t know nothing. But i don’t think a super heated air burst from a descending meteor that then disintegrates completely and, or, explodes in the atmosphere causing said “airburst”, sending a superheated heatwave to the ground, requires an impact crater. even under known scientific “consensus”.
    1
  19. you are more than welcome to it. these translations exist already of course. would have to put on your work clothes however, sit down to your computer, and go find those universities’ archeaology departments that have already deciphered all that cuneiform. Would be nice if he did do a video, or linked all the citations and sources so we could click on it and read the academic paper with the translation.
    1
  20. yah he “slammed” you for pretty good reason but you ain’t about to admit it. doesn’t matter either. and i think and opine that you know that as well. Good ole internet. God forbid he directly quote some of your mischaracterizations of what some other people say. People who do not claim that what they are saying is fact, in fact.
    1