Comments by "nozrep" (@nozrep) on "Lex Clips"
channel.
-
128
-
83
-
71
-
55
-
25
-
15
-
12
-
9
-
0:23; to be clear that is also NOT how Christianity works. That is how Judaism works, and how it worked before Jesus’s death on the cross and resurrection. Very clearly and very specifically in Romans in the Bible, the Apostle very clearly delineates how all our sin is washed away by Jesus Christ when an individual accepts Him as Savior and His salvation. Very clearly, very importantly, the Apostle Paul wrote about this in Romans, and also wrote about, in Romans, how we, even after redeemed by Christ, will continue to struggle with earthly sins and desires of our “flesh” as we continue to live. But now, we do not go to hell for sinning only once and needing an animal sacrifice to cancel it out, as with historical Judaism. So, I love this exScientology guy and I support his work, but he was very specifically very incorrect about sin as it relates to salvation through Jesus Christ.
9
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
i like math. have a degree in finance. In the “culture” maybe not considered as good as an accounting degree. lol.. Seems like some forget though, that, accounting and finance are in fact also categories of maths, applied maths, applying to business and economy and monetary exchange…. I give you money to make a cookie? Finance. Math. I buy a car? Finance. Math. Personal economics. Most individuals do much, much math each day. All day. Even the ones who think they are terrible at math. It is good, in my opinion, to recognize that simply counting the seconds and the dollars is math, just as much as calculating the distance between vast galaxies, is also math! Yes levels of complexity. Yes yes yes yes. But let us not cowtow to the “elitists” who tell us we are dumber just because we cannot do calculus, or physics equations,
but are massively able to count our rice and beans for to eat, each day.
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
i mean yah they are sort of joking but it is also sorta true. Over the course of the early to mid 2000’s and 2010’s, sort of like, a “lull” in the socalled coolness factor of rocket things and space things for various reasons, amongst us millennials and zoomers. Not that it was not still cool, just that the publicity factors supporting the coolness sort of got, like pushed to the side for a while. Then along come the billionaires like Branson, and Bezos, and Musk pledging to make new advancements in space and rockets, and they sort of like, re-light the publicity factors to where it’s making the news a lot more and getting a lot more exposure. So yes, always cool, and more publicities and new publicities spread the “cool” to newer and younger generations.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Guapo10292 and maybe you will not believe me either when I say I am not trying to make myself feel smarter. I’m in my thirties dude, believe me, or don’t, cool; I’ve realized how much less intelligent I am than I once assumed I was. Nevertheless it has also always been stupid and wrong for “those types” to belittle and propagandize against those of us who count things all day everyday, which, is math, and choosing to not learn physics is just a choice and does not actually mean one may be lesser smarter than you, or them.😅 But alas, it does indeed seem that many folks who count stuff and measure and calculate stuff to build stuff all day every day have unfortunately given into the propaganda that they are somehow of lesser intelligence than the theoretical galactical quantumologist, when such folk cannot measure a board for to cut, for to saw, for to build the house whence they reside.
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
robots have already taken plenty of human jobs. Chrysler, Dodge, Ford, Toyota, Daimler, et cetera, they all automated their factories decades ago. I remember watching Mr. Roger’s Neighborhood as a small child in the 1980’s, on PBS, and one of the episodes showed the robots building the cars way back then. Yah. So yes, robots have replaced many human jobs already and will continue to do so, regardless of whether or not full artificial intelligence is achieved in robots. Regardless of whether or not the singularity occurs. Both of these men know these facts, intrinsically, through and through, already.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
which constitutes, in theory, a whole, whole lot more prosecutors having the cajones and courage to prosecute the politicians and public officials, local, state,
and federal, who violate and have violated all those laws in recent years. Laws, already on the books which protect the citizenry against tyranny and authoritarianism, but many of such laws which have not been properly upheld against the officials breaking the laws. E.g, i.e., the extended lockdowns which were always a violation of law by those officials, which were always an over reach and abuse of the “emergency powers laws” that “they” used to justify the lockdowns. Even if you were totally for the lockdown, ALL of the emergency powers laws have a time limit on them, with conditions. And ALL of those time limits and conditions were extended, illegally, arbitrarily, by demotards and repubitard officials alike. And none of them have ever had charges brought against them nor been sent to jail for their tyranny. Thus my soap box. The will to enforce the law must exist and I also agree with your take on it!🎉
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
it is a slippery slope, per se. Tons of non profits exist, tax free, regardless of “religion”. What about all the evil Soros non profits for example, funding forced chemical castration of “trans” children who are not of legal age to decide? Amongst all the other evil tax free non profits? So, my point is, it is possible to expose Scientology for the crap that it is while not stripping its non profit status. If they are actually criminal and actually fraudulent, then yes, they should be stripped. But there has not yet been a “smoking gun” of criminality. Imo, “we” need to focus on that part of it more than tax status. Once scientology is exposed as fraudulent and criminal, all the other “cards” fall too, including tax status.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1