Youtube comments of nozrep (@nozrep).
-
367
-
239
-
217
-
180
-
149
-
138
-
128
-
128
-
115
-
91
-
83
-
82
-
72
-
71
-
69
-
58
-
55
-
55
-
45
-
42
-
42
-
38
-
37
-
36
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
0:23; to be clear that is also NOT how Christianity works. That is how Judaism works, and how it worked before Jesus’s death on the cross and resurrection. Very clearly and very specifically in Romans in the Bible, the Apostle very clearly delineates how all our sin is washed away by Jesus Christ when an individual accepts Him as Savior and His salvation. Very clearly, very importantly, the Apostle Paul wrote about this in Romans, and also wrote about, in Romans, how we, even after redeemed by Christ, will continue to struggle with earthly sins and desires of our “flesh” as we continue to live. But now, we do not go to hell for sinning only once and needing an animal sacrifice to cancel it out, as with historical Judaism. So, I love this exScientology guy and I support his work, but he was very specifically very incorrect about sin as it relates to salvation through Jesus Christ.
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
yep the “official” modern records only go back to 1850. But then we do have many historical accounts from colonial period, from Spanish, French, and British sailors and colonists of hurricanes. And while there’s no way to know the actual strength, cat 1, 2, etc, those accounts that we have from those historical people are devastating. Wiped out several colonial towns. Example, I just recently was listening a podcast about Cabeza de Vaca and the narrator cited the first known, written account of a hurricane that wiped out Havana, Cuba or some early colonial settlement in Cuba. Completely demolished what little there was at that time. It is a historical account from the 1520s, just after they conquered the Aztecs in Mexico and had base of operations in the “new world” in Cuba. Fascinating stuff! And geologists have been able to make note of previous potential hurricanes even before that, through coastal soil analysis, erosion studies, soil core sampling studies, et cetera. It’s always been this way. And fortunately we have modern technology to help us help ourselves. And yet… and yet… we still get shellacked by those durned hurricanes.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
lol yes, and plus also many English speakers make little distinction or make no distinction between the two translations in the particular context that Shirvan explained it in, here in this video. For example, when he said powerful, I totally understood, intrinsically, what he meant. Although if enforcers is a better word then so be it, very good, no problem at all. Usually in most situations of the English language, individuals in a story who are considered to be “enforcer” level are also immediately and simultaneously and intrinsically considered to be powerful. Though, also, I don’t blame the commenters for drawing the distinction either. It’s just, what in the English language some would call, “a quibble”. Applicable? Yes absolutely but not necessarily necessary for most “native” English speakers to understand that “enforcer” was implicitly imputed into the context of Shirvan saying “powerful”, given the specific context of the entire video, which was excellent in my opinion.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
i love these videos but please forgive my quibble... Galveston is most certainly is not and is not considered as North Texas by any current Texan not anyone familiar with the geography of Texas. It would actually be considered South East Texas by many. But mostly, in my experience, it is just considered like as, Galveston, the sandy island next to Houston on the coast of Texas, without much thought given to north, south, east, or west. Although, yes, I suppose it it six or seven hours north of South Padre. Still not north Texas though!
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
same for me too. Yes. Excellent. Yes and I still watch Tim too in the same manner. YT vids yes for sure but I was never gonna subscribe and pay anyways. In my view there is just simply too much free content for me to justify paying anyone. Michael Berry Show, Quartering, Pool, Rogan, MacroVoices, Investors’ Podcast aka We Study Billionaires, Hardcore History Dan Carlin, Clay and Buck, Chrissie Mayr, Shapiro, Crowder. On and on and on and on. Never had to pay any of it besides my monthly internet bill. I am very happy to live in this modern day and age of an “embarrasment of riches” such as this while seeking to hope to fight to preserve such freedoms
and riches for the future kids too. Would much, much rather spend my money on fishing lures and pewpews. And I do!
5
-
5
-
there are in fact other legitimate ones, you just have not come across them yet. Many many independent, licensed, permitted, college degreed financial advisors are having their own youtube channels these days, as a means of advertising their services and educating people. That does not negate your opinion. Nor does it cancel out your right to your opinion on the matter. I am simply typing, without hyperbolization and without any all caps lock typeage, that there are, in fact, other and varied actually legitimate finance tubers out here on the tubes, covering various aspects of personal finance, whether tax or investing or entrepreneurship or estate and trust planning or legal tax avoidance tactics, et cetera, et cetera.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
“can this thing really hold...” well yes, I believe so, and as one of your evangelical fanboys, I will say that the leftists have always tried, and unfortunately, have succeeded many times in using that against us, when in fact, many or even most of us “evangelicals” who believe in Jesus and believe, literally, every word of the Bible, also believe wholeheartedly in the principles of individual freedom and the Biblical concept of humanity’s free will, and we have every intention of loving all to life change through Christ while simultaneously fully respecting each person’s individual rights, even if that includes what we consider sinful according to the Bible. For indeed, the Bible specifically states, in no uncertain terms, that no one is without sin, and that is the reason for salvation through faith in Jesus Christ. Of course, there are also your “authoritarian” evangelicals who exist. But they are not actually evangelical. They are liars, just like the leftists authoritarians. And we must guard against all of them.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Texas is a right to work state. Which I myself am thankful for, as one individual. I get to choose if I myself want to join a union or not. If indeed I were to work for a company or industry that had a union. Unions may, and do, have their advantages. And, the reason for “right to work” legislation in the first place, was, corruption in unions, telling you that you were not allowed to work for a company if you did not join a union, which is an anti-freedom position. All that stated, I am very curious how the strike thing is going to work out for the longshoreman’s union in right-to-work states in the Gulf of Mexico areas. Subsequently, I am also having fantasies about going down to Galveston and making 25 an hour as strike busting right to work entry level longshoreman, if the ILA strikes in Texas. Look, I stated my bias, and I am not afraid to, haha, well, on the internet anyway😂. But also I know absolutely zero things about what an entry level longshoreman makes in Houston or Galveston. I am super curious, genuinely, about how a strike is going to play out in a right to work state, if indeed they do strike. Seems like some sort of capitalistic, entrepreneurial opportunity, or something, I dunno, for an independent contractor, right to work longshoreman strike buster contractor of some sort or another. Very curious!!
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
i don’t think Harry should go back to the advisors who protected him after Prince Di died. I meannn if those people helped raise him, look how turned out. Nah, he would need better advisors than that, ones who may hold him to account, in a gentle way, while simultaneously teaching him how to proceed and, or, have less abusive relationships. But even if a separation happens, it may seem unlikely that he would allow himself to do that with that much money. Well, anyways, lots of people been fact checking em even when social media were censoring for them. So few people trust anyway, except for the royalty worshipping peasants in UK and America. Me, I am a peasant libertarian. i hate royalty, i hate communism, i love individual freedom
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
main issue I have is with the real scientists and the real archaeologists, apparently, sometimes being unable to see that some theorists are not actually claiming something is fact. Yes, Hancock is a book writer and a story telller, for sure. And a persuasive and entertaining one. But even if he did, or has in the past, he does not nowadays claim that all the things he says are in fact, fact. The real scientists, and the real archaeologists, are SUPPOSED to be proponents of the the Five Steps of the Scientific Method, are they not? Does not one of the five steps involve coming up with ideas? Even “crazy” ideas? In order to then take the next step of TESTING the theory? TESTING the idea? to either prove it or disprove it with empirical evidence? Yes this is the way of the scientific method I do believe. And some things, we cannot prove. And therefore, we must always be careful to acknowledge that alas, some things that appear to be real still, alas, remain theory in lieu of empirical measurements, even if we do have observational or, circumstancial evidence.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Everson33 yes. haha. indeed selling is a form of pushing😅. I suppose that, the least pushy way might be, in a very general way… like, “i have something to sell, sir. I believe it can be of use to you. I would like to ask you to give me money for it, and I shall transfer full and complete ownership of it to you when you give me money. Would you give me money, sir, for this thing that I personally believe can be of use to you? The decision is completely yours, of course, and you are free to decide, freely. Yet, it is also true that I am very much hoping that you decide that it may of use to you as, I believe it will be.”. 😂 that’s the way I’d characterize not-pushy salesmanship as opposed to the opposite. The central theme and idea of Free Market Capitalism, as it were.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
i like math. have a degree in finance. In the “culture” maybe not considered as good as an accounting degree. lol.. Seems like some forget though, that, accounting and finance are in fact also categories of maths, applied maths, applying to business and economy and monetary exchange…. I give you money to make a cookie? Finance. Math. I buy a car? Finance. Math. Personal economics. Most individuals do much, much math each day. All day. Even the ones who think they are terrible at math. It is good, in my opinion, to recognize that simply counting the seconds and the dollars is math, just as much as calculating the distance between vast galaxies, is also math! Yes levels of complexity. Yes yes yes yes. But let us not cowtow to the “elitists” who tell us we are dumber just because we cannot do calculus, or physics equations,
but are massively able to count our rice and beans for to eat, each day.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
i dunno anything about Finns or Finland but from the few videos I’ve watched, seems like I’d like a lot of ‘em. Seems like I could compare some of the Finnish to what we here in America would call, “rednecks”, or “country boys”. Haha self reliant people! Redneck started out as a pejorative or as an attempted insulting term but rednecks themselves almost always looked at it as a complimentary term like, ‘yah, I’m a country person, a rural person. I survive. I rely on myself. I am self sufficient. I work hard and I hunt and fish too.’ Haha so I do not know,
but it just seems to me sorta kinda maybe. Hey Finnish guy, a famous American country music song exists also, ‘A Country Boy Can Survive!’ A fun and awesome American Country Music song from the 1970’s or, 1980’s.😂
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
3:51: yessir, that is of course what he is doing. That is, of course what all scientists who, for really reals follow the five steps of the scientific method, do! They START with a conclusion! It is known as: a theory, an abstract, a hypothesis. Yes, that is correct. And while Hancock may not be a scientist, STARTING with a conclusion or hypothesis is THE first step of the Five Steps of the Scientific Method!😅 And then we test the evidence and gather the evidence, if any. Alas, Hancock had indeed formed many of his entertaining stories upon evidence that definitely exists, but which there is no apparent explanation for. Therein lies the consternation, I posit.
2
-
2
-
2
-
10:00; unfortunately, i definitely do not assume good faith anymore, but I am typing in an overall sense, in general. Going wayeee of topic here. Being a political conservative, during the pandemic I saw just too much blatant and illegal abuse of powers by politicians that, I realized I could no longer assume that they were doing things in good faith. All lockdowns were demonstrably illegal, for example. A blatant abuse of the fourth amendment. And the first amendment. So, no, I will not assumed good faith any longer, in any way, shape, or form. Across all intellectual subjects. Across all individuals. Across all politicians regardlessof party. Across all scientists. Nevertheless: good faith DOES still exist!!! Therefore, I shall definitely NOT assume good faith. Neither shall I definitely assume bad faith. But I will absolutely question question question. Yes. I AM that high maintenance person. And if it ever told me that I am wrong to question anything, for ANY reason at all. THAT is the moment I always choose tp assume bad faith in anyone. Including Hancock, including Dibble. Including Hawas. Including Trump and Newsome and Obama and other repubitards and libtards. Nevertheless again: good faith does exist. Be careful out there.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
yes, given the context and politics and history of the time, they split. Good overview. Yet also, the legal process of votings and referendums by which they could, in theory, vote to reunite as One Dakota remains intact. Of course, that would be, in theory, up to the will of the population, of legal, of age voters. And you would have to convince many politicians to “sacrifice” or give up their powers to accomodate the reduction. The fewer the politicians the better. But alas, at this point, it also seems that ND and SD have become attached to their identities.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
that’s not at all what premodernist said. Not at all. May I encourage you to re-listen. When he brought up Sagan, he was specifically referring to the “pseudo history” side of things, not the pseudo archaeology side. He specifically referred to some the things Sagan stated about history, pointing out that they were unproven statements about history, not backed up by primary sources, thereby rendering them to be historical theory or, if you must, pseudo history. Premodernist did not at all say that Sagan promoted pseudo archaeology. And here, we see in action the specific point that Premodernist made: how easy it is for many of us even most of us to inadvertently, unintentionally fall into the socalled “trap” of pseudo anything. For example as you incorrectly thought that he said Sagan was promoting pseudo archaeology, when in fact he did not say that at all. Listening carefully is hard though! And I know, because I am ADHD, and forgetful!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
alas, this is not a good way either. Critical thinking skills must be employed to question, and recognize, with courage inside oneself, that some or many “experts” really are legitimate. My dentist, for example. Or the engineers and architects who designed and helped build the roads that I drive on every day, and the buildings that I work in every day, which do not collapse onto my body and kill me every day. You see, there are many experts that even you trust maybe without even realizing it. And I trust them too! And so we should. AND YES! Yes of course there are unfortunately also many charlatan liars in the world who also claim to be experts, who are definitely not experts, and you, and me, ought to always be questioning and questioning and questioning. Because it is good. And some experts are in fact, real. And some or many “experts” are fake, liars, con artists. Therefore, I encourage you, do not simply type what you typed, but recognize that you trust the expert who designed and engineered the devices and computers with which we type such silly comments. And grow and improve in you critical thinking skills, I exhort and encourage you.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
agreed. bravo. Well in this particular clip, anyways.😅 Some of his other clips he does present some fear mongering information. Nevertheless, his speaking style, his presentation style, is always upbeat and cheerful. haha, even when he is talking of “dire consequences”. He says it and speaks it with a smile!😂 Which, actually, is one of the foundational tenets and rules of public speaking. Always speak with a smile. Because, speaking in English, with an intentional smile, causes the human body to spread the face’s lips apart, which, in the English language, causes a person to always speak more clearly and pronunciationally, to one’s audience. One can be understood, more easily.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
fair point. if one stays on a computer. Or. Don’t. And retain your natural, inalienable, God given privacy. And, retain your natural freedom, existent before the Constitution and laws were written, still officially protected by the existing laws and Constitution, but increasingly ignored by the tyrannical and corrupt government of the USA, and we have not yet held them accountable, we, the people. Trade offs, trade offs, trade offs. Indeed. Indeed they exist. And the trafe offs suck too because internet and technology are totally cool and useful. But the tyrannical powers who hate your individual, inalienable rights and who hate my individual, inalienable rights, as enshrined in the Bill of Rights, and as recognized by the Founders to exist above and beyond and before they chose to write them down, are currently being ignored, it seems. And we the people have yet to each individually but together all rise up again, together, against them. But we must. We shall.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
that is so cool! however I am curious about the spires. Like, being a whole building, theoretically dedicated to Jesus Christ and the religion of Christianity… why would historians automatically assume the spires are representative of human archbishops? Would not a plausibility be that, the three spires are representative of the Holy Trinity? Like the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit? Or… the crosses? With the taller spire being representative of Christ on the Cross? I mean I have not tried to research further yet… but it just seemed interesting that our narrator and host who worked there only related the one theory about the ancient archbishop. Anyways also, I am certainly not saying he is wrong! He of course will know much better. Just that it seems to me, that, a “Christian” structure, with three tall spires, pointing to heaven, and the whole thing about sets of three in the Bible and Christianity and the Holy Trinity… and stuff like that…
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
i mean yah they are sort of joking but it is also sorta true. Over the course of the early to mid 2000’s and 2010’s, sort of like, a “lull” in the socalled coolness factor of rocket things and space things for various reasons, amongst us millennials and zoomers. Not that it was not still cool, just that the publicity factors supporting the coolness sort of got, like pushed to the side for a while. Then along come the billionaires like Branson, and Bezos, and Musk pledging to make new advancements in space and rockets, and they sort of like, re-light the publicity factors to where it’s making the news a lot more and getting a lot more exposure. So yes, always cool, and more publicities and new publicities spread the “cool” to newer and younger generations.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@samuelroselli138 all people regardless of income ought to be concerned with politics in America, sir. It is, in fact, essential to the correct functioning of a representative republic form of government, concerning the idea of, government by the people, for the people. The statement implicitly includes all individuals regardless of income or social status. Do you, sir, believe in the Bill of Rights as currently written, and the ideas of individual freedom and government by the people, for the people? If you do not, may I magnanimously encourage you to be honest with yourself about not being a touter and promoter of the necessity for each individual to participate in our democratic representative republic, here in America
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
i am one of your ones that tries to look tough. it actually goes a long way, in my opinion. Demeanor and body language can in fact make people leave you alone if you want to be left alone, I have found. That said, I also realized, along the way in my life, that I am actually a coward. I didn’t want to be, and I do not want to be a coward anymore. But I was, and, or, I have a tendency to be. And the first step in change, I also believe,
is being truthful with one’s own self about such things even if it is a really, really really brutal and crappy truth. One must acknowledge so that they can then choose to go in an opposite direction.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Guapo10292 and maybe you will not believe me either when I say I am not trying to make myself feel smarter. I’m in my thirties dude, believe me, or don’t, cool; I’ve realized how much less intelligent I am than I once assumed I was. Nevertheless it has also always been stupid and wrong for “those types” to belittle and propagandize against those of us who count things all day everyday, which, is math, and choosing to not learn physics is just a choice and does not actually mean one may be lesser smarter than you, or them.😅 But alas, it does indeed seem that many folks who count stuff and measure and calculate stuff to build stuff all day every day have unfortunately given into the propaganda that they are somehow of lesser intelligence than the theoretical galactical quantumologist, when such folk cannot measure a board for to cut, for to saw, for to build the house whence they reside.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
k but that’s what you agreed to when you clicked the agree to terms of service when you created your free youtube account. Soooo… are you against capitalism and business? See, this is one of the quite unfortunate grey areas of our “free market” system. Well much less free than it used to be. While I agree with a digital bill of rights idea, it is also technically, already covered. And the rights of business owners to run their businesses is also covered. Youtube is still Google. Google is still a business, owned by people. Owned by shareholders. And, unfortunately, the majority shareholders who actually make decisions have decided that they are ok with the soft censorship that they are engaging in. Is it unfortunate? absolutely. Should they be stopped from from doing it? I don’t really think so. Because if that happened, that would be an equally fascistic thing that we would be doing against them. Yes, I am much more on favor of “re-freeing” the markets, as it were. I believe if google were denied it’s ability to maintain it’s oligopolistical powers in the market, they might very quickly quit with the ridiculous censorship, which definitely is them brushing against the barriers between your rights, my rights, and the business owners’ rights. It is a very tough issue indeed.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
well, it could, in theory. A safe place to say whatever you want, however you want, in the goal of making people laugh. Aka real art, aka real real free speech, aka real comedy, even if it bombs. A safe space to bomb or to make people laugh in any which way possible. But again, yes, in the way that you are using it in reference to the woke, yes you are correct safe space and comedy does not go together.
1
-
1
-
yes jokes fun fun fun. and also, in real reality, we know for a fact that Louis XIV was a hateful absolute monarch. An absolute dictator if you will. So, yes, in fact, Dartagnan, the real one, was in fact a real hired goon killing others for the hateful absolute monarch. That being acknowledged, we, being cultured people, we of course are able to separate the real part from the fictional part of Dumas’s novels and just enjoy the story anyways! 😅 Because I do so love the Musketeer stories!!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
robots have already taken plenty of human jobs. Chrysler, Dodge, Ford, Toyota, Daimler, et cetera, they all automated their factories decades ago. I remember watching Mr. Roger’s Neighborhood as a small child in the 1980’s, on PBS, and one of the episodes showed the robots building the cars way back then. Yah. So yes, robots have replaced many human jobs already and will continue to do so, regardless of whether or not full artificial intelligence is achieved in robots. Regardless of whether or not the singularity occurs. Both of these men know these facts, intrinsically, through and through, already.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
i personally conspiratorialize that some of the Rumble programmers are “infiltrators” who are intentionally not improving the search function, on purpose. Yah yah yah, no evidence, total conspiracy theory on my part, yes. But also, google’s/youtube’s user-friendly search functions have been around in the world long enough to where in my opinion, it should not be too terribly hard for the correct team of programmers to replicate. Again, total opinion on my part, I am not a programmer nor do I have the slightest first idea how hard or easy it might be to program a highly functional search function on a website. But yah, unfortunately, Rumble’s search function has GOT to be improved if they really really want to compete with the big boys as they supposedly claim to want to do.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
i, for one regular joeschmoe, fan of history, uneducated in formal anthropological technical analysis, am very glad to hear that anthros and archeos are, more and more, admitting the “non-binary” between nomadical and or agricultural societies. Because from my own joeschmoe perspective, seems like, even if there were to be something approximating a binary concept of it, it’s like, there still has to a transitionary era somewhere in it, right? Or, also, are humans not adaptable? Are we not omnivores even in our modern days? Again from my regular uneducated dude perspective, it’s seems to me it’s like, yah, people groups went back and forth and amongst it as various food resources got used up or new ones were discovered, and were able to be like, ohhhhhhhh time to go back to eating this, or, oopsie it’s all gone,
time to go back to eating that.😅 So yah that’s my regular dude interpretation of stuff like that. And I even make a non-relateable comparison to my own self. Like, ohhhh yes I much prefer steak, bbq, and some buttered asparagus as my vegetable. But yo, steak is expensive!! Oopsie, gotta go back to eggs and bacon for breakfast and rice and beans steamed up real delicious for dinner.😁
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
i don’t disagree. However I also believe slightly differently that many of “us” on the other side, such as the American Christian conservative family I grew up in, many of us totally dropped the ball, as it were, for many decades, unfortunately, recognizing it as it happened and grew, talking and speaking and praying against it amongst ourselves, yet also somehow, simultaneously totally underestimating the enemies resolve to destroy our freedoms. And while it may not we too late, and while we must fight regardless, some of us just completely underestimated the enemy and haven’t done as much as we should to protect all peoples’ freedoms against, for one example, the tyranny of the plandemic.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
11:29; mmhmm, nuclear weapons are terrible, i shall not deny, and yet, how can we get rid of them if there exists, I believe, an indisputable risk that other polities in the world would use them to start wars and conquer peoples, as opposed to using them to end a war, as the USA did? no, unfortunately, but no, we should definitely not get rid of nuclear weapons. And if USA gets a dictator that starts a war with them, I will be a partisan against that dictator, especially if he is orange. In the mean time, I am proud and patriotic that America ended Imperial Japan’s aggression with nuclear, and the emperor was the one who put all of his own people, some of them totally innocent children, on the path to destruction that he put them on.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
well then, you should learn what the difference between leftist “liberalism” and classical liberalism is, because they were referring to classical liberalism, that is- free speech, capitalism, et cetera. These are good things of course, and fall under the category of classical liberalism. It was only in the 1950s that American leftists co-opted the term “liberal” and fast forward to today, we now have this bad connotation of liberal, which is appropriate against the leftist liberals, who are not actually liberal, since they oppose classically liberal values such as freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom to individual self defense, et cetera.
1
-
so, who bought the mansion then? or, further, was a mansion bought by anybody?😅 Yes of course. Yes, pf course, people buy and sell lavish mansions every day in Florida, a beautiful and awesome state! So, let us ask more questions. Let us ask, did any sort of entity of any sort with ANY sort of overseas connection buy a mansion? If so, what sort of overseas connection? A Ukrainian connection? There is certainly a contingent of bothe Ukrainian and Russian expats in Florida. Lots of third or fourth generation Americans who even still keep a connection to their ancestral homeland. So, who? Who I ask? Because, these types of videos ARE NOT actually investigative journalism. They’re counter-propaganda. Propaganda against propaganda. No actual empirical details are actually cited and proven beyond a shadow of any doubt. So prove it, Euronews. Cite public records. Cite llc documents. Cite names. Prove it. I for one, totally am willing to believe that Zelensky has taken steps to ensure his own survival in exile, when it all falls apart, inevitably.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You CAN invest in a gold mining company. A precious metals mining company. You CAN invest in the Mining Industry, which includes gold, copper, silver, oil, and many other materials that are mined and used to manufacture things. And guess what? Some, not all, but SOME of those gold and silver miners pay a dividend. Now, let me be clear. Gold in hand is not the investment. Separate the two concepts with your critical thinking skills. Physical gold in hand is not the investment, it is similar to insurance. But yes, a company? Yes, you can actually invest in a company that mines for gold, mines for oil, mines for coal, mines for rare earth metals, mines for iron, et cetera, et cetera. And yes, some, not all, but some mining companies that you can invest in do in fact pay a dividend. They pay dividend in fiat currency lol.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
glad that yall watch. Though an American and not super involved, I am hearing from some of our conservative radio shows/podcasters that many think Vivek would accept a VP nomination with Trump. It seems likely to me that yall Aussies might be being told that Trump cannot run. This is not true, however. It is propaganda. Yes, “they” are trying to make it where he cannot run. However, in actual fact, there is no law that prevents someone under indictment from continuing to run for office. Furthermore, in case the Aussie media has not told you, the indictments against Trump are all outside of the statute of limitations, making them all dead on on arrival. It can now be seen by yourselves that it is all for political theater and false accusation. Maybe you already knew all of that though. If so, very good! If not, no worries!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
people, i think that we are forgetting that hummingbirds have wing beats similar to dragon flies. Therefore, despite my previous comment,
having remembered hummingbirds, I shall continue to accept the ornithopter moniker. Moniker, of course, rhyming with ornithopter, which is also fun, pronunciationally, enunciationally, or what have you et cetera. I am ok with the graphic artists that Denis Villeneuve hired deciding to design the CGI in this manner and slipping in an extra wing too. Also. In addition to remembering a hummingbird’s wing beat. Finally, and in imperious conclusion against the original commenter, like, dude, what the frik. It is science FICTION for cryin’ out loud. Scientific authenticity does not matter. The story is 30 thousand years in the future. If you are gonna pussify yourself about ornithopters and entomopters, be sure to continue to pussify yourself by complaining about how they did interstellar travel by getting high on worm poop and turning into worms.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
which constitutes, in theory, a whole, whole lot more prosecutors having the cajones and courage to prosecute the politicians and public officials, local, state,
and federal, who violate and have violated all those laws in recent years. Laws, already on the books which protect the citizenry against tyranny and authoritarianism, but many of such laws which have not been properly upheld against the officials breaking the laws. E.g, i.e., the extended lockdowns which were always a violation of law by those officials, which were always an over reach and abuse of the “emergency powers laws” that “they” used to justify the lockdowns. Even if you were totally for the lockdown, ALL of the emergency powers laws have a time limit on them, with conditions. And ALL of those time limits and conditions were extended, illegally, arbitrarily, by demotards and repubitard officials alike. And none of them have ever had charges brought against them nor been sent to jail for their tyranny. Thus my soap box. The will to enforce the law must exist and I also agree with your take on it!🎉
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
i mean, it definitely didn’t end with pearl harbor it started something much worse of course, as we know. but i see what you mean. anyways, Japan had already attacked many countries by that point, and US was trying to stay sorta kinda neutral while opposing axis powers and helping the Brit colonies that were being conquered by Japan. Again, as we certainly know with the hindsight and benefit of history. Anyways, it didn’t end so well for Japan, now did it?😅 Nevertheless many unnecessary deaths all around, on all sides, in the World War. And I very much do not want a third. Because I would be drafted. And I do not want to be drafted. Anyways, Japan and Germany and Italy started all that. And, Russia started this one. Also, I wish they’d stop funding ukraine. Ukraine’s losing anyway. Even with all the stuff we are giving them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@SuperSoundtracks i had a stroke at 34. It can be caused by a variety of factors. Including, but not
limited to, addictions to alcohol and tobacco and or other drugs, dietary choices or lack thereof, lifestyle choices, et cetera. It
can also be caused by a completely genetically inherited flaw in the biology which may go undiagnosed for their whole life. It happens to perfectly healthy individuals, could
be a hole in the heart. Yes, an actual hole in the heart, caused only by genetics and biology and no fault of their own. Could be any one of those factors. Could also be a combination of
those factors. When my cardiologist explained this to me it was very frustrating because I am a person who needs and wants final answers on things. But for some things, including lots of medical things, there simply just is no such thing as a final answer on things that happen to our bodies sometimes. Although, it is certainly true that I drink, I was not an alchoholic. I still reduced my amount of drinking any way from 2 six pack a week to maybe 2 a month.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
welp, on a possibly less humorous, more educational note, should any see this comment, may I add that all the Hillsdale College videos, I would say, are an excellent, free, youtube resource for learning about the Revolution, and the Constitution. Just an excellent institution imo. Additionally, David Barton and Wallbuilders, he is a history expert and credentialed historian, and transparently Christian, never hiding his bias, yet also factually laying out how the the founders thought and why they did what they did, with citations of letters and primary sources documents that they themselves wrote with their own hands.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
you are correct. And, the phrase “that’s nothing” also glosses over the potential amount of stupidity of people in general. Yes it is unfortunate to say, but most people in Houston do not use common sense when trying to drive in a January freeze, since they do not
happen very often. Anyways, also as of 2024, much of Houston folk, especially newe channels, still remember the disaster freeze and snow of 2021. And so, that is why you are seeing these TV people acting so careful and being this way because everyone is trying to avoid the stupidity of the 2021 freeze. ERCOT was totally stupid and unprepared and, unfortunately, it led to some people in Houston also being very stupid and some people died trying to warm themselves with a grill indoors because they were uneducated about carbon monoxide. So we do not want any of that this year. Careful is more better even if when they show the road it still looks like “nothing”.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
it is a slippery slope, per se. Tons of non profits exist, tax free, regardless of “religion”. What about all the evil Soros non profits for example, funding forced chemical castration of “trans” children who are not of legal age to decide? Amongst all the other evil tax free non profits? So, my point is, it is possible to expose Scientology for the crap that it is while not stripping its non profit status. If they are actually criminal and actually fraudulent, then yes, they should be stripped. But there has not yet been a “smoking gun” of criminality. Imo, “we” need to focus on that part of it more than tax status. Once scientology is exposed as fraudulent and criminal, all the other “cards” fall too, including tax status.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1