Comments by "American Plague" (@American-Plague) on "" video.

  1.  @objectoriented3049  So they had MASSIVE ships that could cross entire oceans but for no reason at all they just disappeared and no more were ever made huh? Why isn't there a record of any kind, written or otherwise, of these ships ANYWHERE?
    43
  2.  @objectoriented3049  A dugout canoe is not a NAVAL VESSEL and is not capable of crossing oceans. I asked where the evidence of these naval vessels was. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_ship
    21
  3.  @objectoriented3049  Oh ok: "naval vessels" then. Where is any evidence whatsoever of these existing other than secondary, inferred "evidence"?
    14
  4.  @objectoriented3049  No...a Wikipedia article is just fine. It still isn't a NAVAL VESSEL. It even says in the second article you sent that they are capable of carrying men in calm waters, ie.: not an ocean. (I don't see the point in quoting the entire article either. I am capable of reading.)
    13
  5.  Bobby Deokali  Yeah. I was just reading a post elsewhere that I should look up the Mali Empire because they DEFINITELY made it to the Americas. All I could find was that every single one of the ships disappeared into the ocean to never been seen again, combined with some highly speculative theories.
    10
  6.  @objectoriented3049  The point of his comment was to point out that they didn't have seafaring capability to travel 190 miles, much less cross an entire ocean. So yes, your comment has something to do with defending the fact that you think they could and/or did cross the Atlantic. That should be obvious as well.
    10
  7.  @Simonjose7258  There was a land route to India and most likely to the Andaman Islands as well, not to mention they aren't far iff shore and if there wasn't a direct land route, they were MUCH closer to shore than today. The sea level used to be MUCH lower.
    9
  8.  @objectoriented3049  Grasping at straws? The title of the video literally says "Did Africans reach America before Columbus?", which is what this entire comment section revolves around. The original comment says "the fact that they never reached Madagascar tells us all we need to know", which was then elaborated upon by who you were commenting to. The entire conversation revolves around whether they made to America. Wtf are you on about?
    8
  9.  @objectoriented3049  The video itself is questioning if they sailed the oceans. Didn't you read the title?
    6
  10.    Not to mention the spaceships they used to build!
    6
  11.  @sunnya4310  I highly doubt it.
    5
  12.  maria chavez  Go to another society that doesn't suck then. Nobody is stopping you. You are free to do whatever you want in America, and that includes leaving.
    4
  13.  @optimatesupport3453  It is mind blowing that these champions of science who believe evolution through and through (don't get me wrong... evolution is an absolute fact) at the same time think that for unexplained reasons, different groups of humans, geographically separated from one another for hundreds of thousands of years, would suddenly cease to evolve anymore. That somehow they all look COMPLETELY different and there are known genetic differences (like sub Saharans having no Neanderthal DNA, and from what I understand, the same is true vice-versa, that sub- Saharans contain an unknown ghost population of ancient hominid in their DNA that others don't have)...but still there are no genetic differences and we're all exactly the same. It's ridiculous.
    4
  14.    🤣🤣
    4
  15.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  So zero evidence and I'm supposed to believe conspiracy theories, but ONLY Afrocentric conspiracy theories that promote your narrative....SUURRRRE GUY! LMFAO. GTFO.
    4
  16.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  "😂😂 the Romans failed thousands of years ago.". Every civilization eventually fails. The Romans however achieved things that sub Saharan Africa STILL can't accomplish. Edit: the Romans accomplished things that ANY black nation still can't accomplish (without the help of Europeans that is).
    4
  17.  @objectoriented3049  See Seventy-Three Elephants' comment above. ☝
    3
  18.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  Hard evidence of sub Saharans reaching America. Not just your interpretations of statues, much like how people like you had "evidence" that the ancient Egyptians were sub Saharan... until DNA evidence came available (HARD evidence) and proved that was all nonsense and wrong.
    3
  19.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  "y'all had a solid 500 year run....". I'm afraid it's MUCH longer than that. Romans and Greeks are Europeans too (in case you didn't know). If you're talking about huwytes as opposed to Europeans and Russia does come out on top, then it still hasn't ended. You need to get your time frames correct. It's THOUSANDS of years at LEAST.
    3
  20.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  Do I really have to explain this again? EGYPTIANS, INCLUDING RAMSES II, WEREN'T BLACK. THIS HAS BEEN PROVEN AS A 100% ACCURATE FACT THROUGH DNA ANALYSIS.
    3
  21.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  Not to mention, the Egyptians as an entire race depicted themselves VERY differently (and superior to) from Nubians who were most definitely black.
    3
  22.  @gussetma1945  Citation is not REQUIRED. It's WANTED by you. Citation for what exactly?
    2
  23.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  That's 100% a bullshit myth that's made up to make Afrocentric skcalb like yourself feel better about themselves. If it's true, YOU send or provide a link and I'll look. I'm not wasting hours looking up nonsense that's not going to be there.
    2
  24.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  I don't care what is a testimony to. The facts are that there's ABSOLUTELY NO evidence for it. It doesn't matter how much your feelings are hurt. Facts are facts.
    2
  25.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  There's no evidence for any God existing but there is one (God. Maybe even many.) "You can look it up".
    2
  26.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  If cowards refuse to believe Afrocentric conspiracy theories and straight up lies, then yes, I'm a huge coward.
    2
  27.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  skcalb also were the ones who started the Tulsa race riots based on nothing more than paranoid RUMORS (right up your alley). I think you intentionally ignore that part. I'm not reading your dissertations on kcalb history anymore either. Either stay on one topic until that's settled or shut up. O don't have to sit here and respond to thousands of points you keep bringing up more. That's not how a debate works.
    2
  28.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  I don't care about all these things just yet. Stop trying to cover 20 things at once. That's a typical douchebag move by someone who doesn't want to stay focused on one topic at a time because they'll be proven wrong if they do so. You were disputing the fact that DNA evidence proves that during the reign of Ramses II, Egyptians weren't NOT sub Saharan (yes, I know that's a double negative). Present your facts that dispute what the journal Nature has to say about it. Once that is settled, THEN we can move on to the next topic.
    2
  29.  @collinhenry9996  Africans were not KIDNAPPED by anyone except OTHER AFRICANS, who then sold them to everyone else in the world. If you're going to tell stories, tell them honestly and correctly.
    2
  30.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  There's no evidence of slave ships existing? AWESOME! You need to get busy telling all skcalb that the Transatlantic slave trade is a lie! How stupid are you exactly?
    1
  31.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  There's also no evidence that aliens didn't build every structure on Earth and there's no evidence that poltergeists exist. I guess we better believe those too huh?
    1
  32.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  So since there's "no evidence" of slave ships existing (according to you) and we "believe" they existed, we can believe LITERALLY ANYTHING that no evidence exists for. Is that what you're saying?
    1
  33.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  There's no evidence that huwytes didn't invent and build EVERYTHING ON EARTH EVER..... but we must believe it because I say it's true. You can look it up.
    1
  34.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  How fucking dumb are you? There is PLENTY of evidence slave ships existed. Thousands of records by the ships' crew, living witness drawings, millions of Africans didn't fly to the New World (how do you think they got here?), living witness testimony from slaves about how they got to the New World, etc., etc. You may have just said the dumbest thing I've heard in a LONG time. That being said, what I want is you to direct me to some type of evidence that Sub Saharans EVER traveled anywhere CLOSE to the New World.
    1
  35.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  I don't care if you COULD cross an ocean in a dugout. They COULD have built a nuclear reactor too as it IS POSSIBLE. That doesn't mean they did. Do you have any evidence at all supporting this? Do you have any evidence at all about these Muslims that supposedly were in South America for 700 years? If you have nothing but myths, please stfu and argue with someone with your own intelligence.
    1
  36.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  "look it up. Look it up. Look it up. " I don't need to look anything up. That's not how claims work. YOU are the one making the claim. YOU need to provide evidence. It's not up to me to endlessly search the internet for an indeterminate amount of time as if I'm writing my doctorate thesis paper in order to prove you wrong or correct. It's up to YOU to provide the evidence. Especially since you already know where it's at, it should only take you 30 seconds. You've spent more time than that arguing here. Why can't you simply show me where to look? Seems easy enough according to you.
    1
  37.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  Huwytes are the most altruistic race. "You can look it up". See how that works?
    1
  38.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  IT IS NOT UP TO ME TO "LOOK FOR IT". HOW STUPID ARE YOU? HOW MANY TIMES MUST I REPEAT THIS? YOU NEED TO PROVIDE PROOF. WHERE IS IT?
    1
  39.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  What evidence? You haven't given any. That's what I keep asking for. You don't HAVE any evidence.
    1
  40.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  Incorrect. There is a living witness testimony inscribed in a temple about the appearance of Ramses II the Great: "fair-skinned with wavy locks of red hair and an aqualine nose". Plus they took hair samples from the ROOT (so don't even try the bullshit excuse that it's henna) that confirms he had red hair. Idk about you but I don't know any fair skinned, red headed sub Saharans with an aqualine nose. Go peddle your Afrocentric lies else.
    1
  41.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  Meanwhile, there isn't one single shed of evidence that they were sub Saharan.
    1
  42.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  I'm sorry but other YouTubers conspiracy theories are not evidence. If I'm to believe them I might as well just take your word for it. I want evidence from a reputable source. Not just another person like you making claims and making videos about those claims. Wtf makes you think YouTube videos are a reputable source for truth? This alone speaks for your intelligence and you are much more stupid than you claim to be.
    1
  43.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  Yawn... anyone that has to continually point out how smart they are usually isn't as smart as they think they are. Lol.
    1
  44.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  "say things without being able to stand on them". You mean like what you're doing? Making claims with nothing but YouTuber claims for "evidence"?
    1
  45.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  Yes. You WILL run circles around me because as I just pointed out: you can't stay in topic. That's generally what people make claims with no evidence do: keep changing the subject from this point to that point to the next point so that the responder can never respond to it all and the claimant can them pretend they won. Flat Earthers are kings of doing this. Think about that for a second: you are using the same tactic as a Flat Earther. They think they're really smart too!
    1
  46.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  So yeah... go ahead and run your circles and pretend you won. When you have evidence from a reputable source and not just other Afrocentric YouTubers like yourself, I'll take it seriously.
    1
  47.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  Russians are huwyte too so why would I be mad? As far as China, I rather like Asians. They are much more pleasant to be around than skcalb. As far as Africa being on top AGAIN (which is impossible as Africa hasn't been on top since the invention of the bone harpoon)....LMFAO! GOOD LUCK WITH THAT! 😂
    1
  48.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  Where did I say they started bombing themselves? You fucking idiot. Learn to read. I said they STARTED IT. You need to have YOUR ass beat for claiming how smart you are while being half illiterate.
    1
  49.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  Sub Saharans didn't even have a written language, no form of mathematics whatsoever, no building over one story and all of them made of grass and wood or something as simple as a WHEEL for God's sake until it was introduced to them by Arabs and huwytes.... but I'm supposed to believe they did all these amazing things because some guys on YouTube said they did.... yeah...ok.
    1
  50.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  sub Saharan Africa has never accomplished and was still in the Stone Age when Europeans arrived. These reports match exactly what Arabs at the time also had to say about sub Saharan Africa. I know: the entire WORLD is out to look down on blacks even though they were so technologically advanced.
    1
  51.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  "...WE'RE smelting STEAL before ROMAN'S..." My, my! Aren't we intelligent! First, I don't take the word of anyone who doesn't have grade school level spelling. And what use (if this is even true...I HIGHLY doubt it and if they were I have am EXTREMELY hard time believing they developed it themselves seeing as how they couldn't even make a WHEEL) did they put this supposed steel to?
    1
  52.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  Keep lying and show everyone how stupid you are. The mummies tested ranged from the 16th century BC to the Roman period; a THIRTEEN HUNDRED YEAR SPAN. This information can be found by searching "Egyptian mummies dna" and going down the the second or third article on Nature. Ramses II reigned during the 13th century BC.... RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE of this time period. Get lost loser.
    1
  53.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  Oh, is that so? And where are these facts that prove Nature (the scientific journal) to be wrong? (YouTube keeps deleting your responses btw. You must've made too many racially charged comments!)
    1
  54.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  I'm waiting...👂
    1
  55.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  You don't need to prove whether they were sub Saharan or not. Scientists already have. And Ramses II himself was not black of any kind. We've been over this Tony. Ramses II was RED HEADED and FAIR SKINNED with an aquline nose. This is so established fact. We have his body. Hair tests have been done. We have living witness testimony in temple. There are absolutely NO blacks that look like this without being mixed.
    1
  56.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  Who said he was White? I said he wasn't black. And if blacks create a different color through their offspring, then a new race is born and they aren't black anymore, are they?
    1
  57.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  According to the science that you believe in, ALL races came from blacks. So either we're all black and you're arguing about nothing, or when a new color is created by offspring of blacks, a new race begins and they are no longer black.
    1
  58.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  I want a reputable, scientific source that explicitly states that he was black. Show me.
    1
  59.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  "black people make all colors". So when another color of person branches off from blacks, when exactly do we consider them a different race? Whenever is convenient for your Afrocentric narrative?
    1
  60.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  Oh really? Is that why sub Saharans, Caucasians and Asians are all part different SPECIES then?
    1
  61.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  Yet more Afrocentric lies and myths. He isn't TAN today. He's STILL BLACK.... because he's 2,000 years old, not because of his race. There's no evidence supporting this story and is just another black myth.
    1
  62.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  The FACTS are: different races are different sub species from one another regardless what scientists say who are terrified of upsetting the woke world of academia. You absolutely can NOT have DNA from at least 3 different SPECIES in different races and at the same time tell me there's absolutely no genetic differences. That's the most conflicting things I've ever heard. And we have numerous evidence of Ramses and all other Egyptians of the time being not black, including DNA analysis of numerous mummies from Ramses II's time. We have ZERO evidence aside from Afrocentric myths and whichever way you feel like interpreting things on whatever day you feel like in favor of Egyptians being black. You follow whatever nonsense you want to. I'm sticking with factual information.
    1
  63.  @echochamberdisrupter2852  OH OK. That's nice.
    1
  64.  @user-uc4vg4rg9e  Idk what you're trying to say. The Lapita people are a type of boat (canoes)? WHAT is how the Pacific Islands are BELIEVED to be inhabited? This thread has almost 200 comments and up to a year old. I can't remember what was said exactly and I don't want to search through it.
    1
  65. We also have NUMEROUS examples of genetically related people inhabiting many different Pacific Islands. We have ZERO evidence of Sub Saharans inhabiting anywhere except sub Sahara itself, save maybe North Sentinel Island, which is not far off shore whatsoever and would've had a land bridge to it during the Ice Age.
    1
  66.  @user-uc4vg4rg9e  Yes. It's VERY unlikely. Even if a boat can cross an ocean in theory, where would enough food, water, material for shelter from nonstop direct sun, etc. go? Water itself would be a nearly impossible logistical challenge. Even on massive naval vessels like Columbus's ships there was barely enough water for the time alloted to make the journey. In fact, there WASN'T enough as most of the water was putrid by the time they reached the New World. To think a canoe could accomplish this is ridiculous.
    1
  67.  @Jihadhamlett  THEY did a test showing Cleopatra, the ancient Egyptians and Beethoven were black too. Those have all been proven to be lies.
    1
  68. @Jihadhamlett  Search it yourself. Google "DNA results of Egyptian mummies". NO SUB SAHARAN ANCESTRY FOUND. I'm not your do boy.
    1
  69.  @TimesUhave2BA_radicalintellect  No, a better analog would be you and a friend walked into the kitchen, took a shit in the sink and left. Later your wife walked in and baked a cake and your friend stabbed you in the back and traded you for that cake, then pretended like he baked the cake himself and then once the cake was gone, started complaining to the wife about how he needs an endless supply of free cakes because he can't/ refuses to learn how to bake his own cake.
    1