Comments by "American Plague" (@American-Plague) on "Tucker: Liberal activists now want to 'defund the police'" video.

  1.  GST1974  "they shouldn't have military hardware". What exactly do you suggest the police use then to deal with criminals who DO have military hardware? BB guns, snap-pops and some soothing words?
    17
  2.    What's wrong with his comment? It's not a bad idea actually. I mean they/you(?) don't want the police there (problem solved there) and it would save countless man hours of police work, which would cut cost, which would mean we actually COULD defund police while still having them in the areas they are wanted. It's a win win situation it sounds like to me.
    10
  3.  @venomsucks  Most people who are armed are NOT going to willingly hand over their guns. Plus, if there are no police, who's goingto be taking them?
    9
  4. Very nicely put Marco! Many, MANY other independent nations' Declarations of Independence and Constitutions are based DIRECTLY from the United States' documents, nearly to the point of "plagiarism" (obviously plagiarism doesn't technically apply in a case like this but my point is made). These documents not only changed this country, but DIRECTLY changed nearly the entire WORLD, all for the better as far as freedoms and liberties are concerned, so far as I know. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
    5
  5.  @martyk1156  That MAY be true, however, what does that have anything to do with racism? Are you implying that all poor people are African American? You see, THIS (your comment) is why we see liberals as the actual racists.
    5
  6. To hell in a handbasket if this nonsense doesn't stop.
    5
  7.  Janet Watters  Even if George Floyd did nothing at all, there is NO evidence of racial injustice. The cop who killed him had numerous complaints filed against him with internal affairs during his career from NUMEROUS races. This implies a f**k head cop, not necessarily racial injustice though. To say it was racial injustice is a textbook example of a non sequitur.
    5
  8.    Yeah...I'm not following how any of what you just said has anything to do with the topic at hand.
    4
  9.  @melsteffano6189  Who said anyone DID take our guns? What was said is liberals said we don't need them because we have the police. See how you just make stuff up? Prime example of liberal lies and idiocy. Idiot.
    4
  10.  @TheHuggybear516  ALL the police or did one cop do something bad? Do you have ANY evidence whatsoever that ALL the police, or even a large portion of the police, aren't upholding the law and actually breaking it? Or is that just your parroted claim?
    3
  11.  @NormalJeans  "is that what FOX propaganda told you?" No you f**cking moron. We all saw black people crying about how scared they were and how black "protesters" ruined their businesses. How exactly is something from the horse's mouth propaganda? Dipshit.
    3
  12. @animeinabox You see, you are the problem (someone not using your brain) that Jan Meojer was speaking about. Did you know that there's more than just 2 people to choose from? As a matter of fact, ANY citizen can be president if they are voted in.
    3
  13.  @davidclark1566  Literally EVERYTHING you have said is nothing but speculation as far as doing anything illegal is concerned. People who demostrably HAVE looted, burned property and violently assaulted innocent people ARE doing something illegal. It seems like you idiots don't have any real defense against this behavior (and for good reason: IT'S ILLEGAL) so you all just scream "But Trump! But Trump". I honestly think Trump is an idiot but can you stick to the subject at hand instead of constantly talking about nothing but Trump? I mean Jesus Christ. It's like you're OCD. "A virus escaped from China." "TRUUUUUMP!" "The United States was just attacked by terrorists." "TRUUUUUMP!" "There is a fly on your soup." "TRUUUUMP!" "An asteroid the size of Florida is headed on a collision course with the Pacific and will wipe out civilization and possibly human kind as we know it." "TRUUUUMP!"
    3
  14.    So explain what's the problem here: certain people don't want police so the police would stop going there. These same people want to spend money that's currently being used to fund the police on other things. Since roughly only half the police will be needed as they won't be bothering these people anymore, there will be lots of extra money that these people can use as they see fit. The people who do still want police around will have them. What's the problem? Please clearly explain what the problem with this is.
    3
  15.  @melsteffano6189  Apparently liberals have comprehension issues as this (putting words in peoples' mouths) seems to be a recurring theme and problem with you idiots.
    3
  16.  @einsozialdemokrat1071  Furthermore, let's assume you're correct on this point. Wouldn't that suggest we need some kind of FORCE or GROUP OF PEOPLE who ARE trained how to use guns? What could we call this...FORCE? The POLICE force maybe?
    3
  17. @Nick Arnold What racial injustice? Do you have any statistics or numbers to back up your claims? So far I've asked HUNDREDS of liberals this with no response yet, other than one who said it's "hidden" and only people of a certain race can see it...which of course is by default, unprovable, not to mention sounds exactly like total and utter 🐎💩.
    3
  18.  @yotogo3619  Family Guy reference?
    2
  19.  Iceman WAUGH  How old are you? You've said you're telling facts but I haven't seen one thing you've said that CAN even be proved to be a fact. Everything you've said is just ad hominem attacks and one, long childish rant.
    2
  20.  Iceman WAUGH  See? This is the problem with liberals. You just proved it by imitating their traits and behavior so well: just making stuff up that isn't true and saying things that were never said....twisting words to fit your narrative in order to be a victim.
    2
  21.  Iceman WAUGH  Furthermore, talking about twisting the truth: I said YOU are making ad hominem attacks. What does that have to do with Trump? Once again: a childish, nonsensical argument. Instead of attacking Trump, maybe you should try to find a flaw in MY argument as Trump isn't setting you straight...I AM.
    2
  22.  Joe Blow  AGREED! 😎👍
    2
  23. @Duan Nengo Hey there big man! You deleted all your posts on the other thread without explaining how you "making 6 figures a year" is a valid argument. What is your argument with that exactly?
    2
  24. @Duan Nengo in an unconvincing deep voice : "I'm 23 bro and I make more money than you!" Lmfao 🤣 Where'd your comments go BRO?
    2
  25.  @AJBAXTER7677  Duan Nengo is "23 BRO" (he's a big man) and "makes 6 figures a year coding from his house in SF BRO" (again....he's a big man). I mean, if that isn't a valid argument/position, Idk what is. He told me this before deleting all his childish posts.
    2
  26.  @AJBAXTER7677  😎👍
    2
  27.  @billgateskilledmyuncle23  EXACTLY (about "peaceful" and about wanting free stuff).
    2
  28.  brjema1  "the vast majority of us are Centrist independent voters and many were Democrats..." FACTS! 😎👍
    2
  29.  @tammyjohnson8161  I think it was punctuation error: I'm a truck driver. Who would want to...
    2
  30.  @martyk1156  And I can totally agree with that so let me retract my statement about you in particular. However, my statement still stands as far as liberals in general are concerned screaming that everything is racist, George Floyd being (brutally and horribly) killed was definitely a racist act, all cops are racist, racial injustice abounds everywhere, etc., etc. I'd like to see some evidence that all of this is true. Funny enough, they never seem to provide any, they just scream that it's happening and then loot, steal and brutally assault innocent people or condone such activities. I don't agree with extreme conservatism either but, the liberals are definitely much worse as they seem to lack basic comprehension skills while basically condoning total anarchy while also wanting the government to provide everything. I mean some of the things they suggest are nothing more than the rantings of insane people.
    2
  31.  @travsaps7852  See above comment to Cart blossum, as it applies to you as well.
    2
  32.  @travsaps7852  See the second response above to Cart blossum. It also applies to you.
    2
  33.  @marcoschaub8978  See the second response above to Cart blossum. It also applies to you.
    2
  34. Well....I see Duan Nengo was ashamed of himself and deleted everything...
    2
  35.  @einsozialdemokrat1071  Instead of proclaiming what the problems are, according to you, what was asked is WITHOUT POLICE AND WITHOUT WEAPONS, HOW ARE WE TO DEFEND OURSELVES AGAINST CRIMINALS WHO MOST CERTAINLY WILL BE ARMED? Your rant didn't really answer anything.
    2
  36.  @kossettereaditte7552  Yep. Over 7 hours he's had to respond to someone with a legitimate answer. Nothing yet....
    2
  37.  @brutusdior1550  BLACK FATHERS MATTER!
    2
  38.  David Bury  That's a VERY good idea. I think we should create a law to where once they defund their police, the Federal officers and military cannot step in to help when things go apeshit, this way the criminals KNOW they 100% have the run of the streets to do whatever they wish and nobody will try to stop them except the citizens that are personally being attacked. Do this as a test to see how it works out for them and THEN decide whether to defund the police on a national level. (Something tells me we'd be adding funds to the police after that)
    1
  39.  @samuelguzman5348  While I whole heartedly dislike the liberals, I must say that is a TERRIBLE argument (proving there's no God). Please, if you have nothing intelligent to say, don't say anything. Thank you.
    1
  40. The only people oppressing African Americans are other African Americans. If an African American speaks/dresses well, gets a good education, works hard and gets a good job, they are called "sell-outs" and accused of "submitting to the white man's world" by other African Americans and other such nonsense because it isn't "cool'.
    1
  41.  Iceman WAUGH  No...I said nothing you have said can even be proven to be factual and you're making ad hominem attacks and going on a childish rant. And NOW you ARE lying, unless you can quote me where I previously said you're lying?
    1
  42.  Iceman WAUGH  Exactly what I thought: you HAVE NO argument. You're a shining example of brainless liberals. Lmfao
    1
  43.  @cryforthemoon  Technically, no humans outside of Africa are native if you're going to take that route. Just saying, it's not a very good argument.
    1
  44.  @shanemorehead5024  I think the cat may have Beth's tongue.
    1
  45.  @bethjohnson8414  Furthermore, none of what I said takes into the account that the numbers and statistics show that not only does racial injustice not abound, it ALMOST isn't even present at all. Do you have ANY kind of evidence that shows otherwise?
    1
  46.  @bethjohnson8414  No....you don't "just want to know". You made a condescending comment implying that Europeans stole the country from Native Americans, which may be so, but it's in the past, I can't do anything about the past and I'm PRETTY sure you can't either. So unless you have a time machine (which even if you did, it could make things worse), let it go. Assuming you live in America, you are blessed with the great fortune to live in such a free place. Stop complaining and take advantage of it.
    1
  47.  @bethjohnson8414  I don't care if your question is answered or not. You do (I guess...Idk because your "question" wasn't really a question, it was a smart-assed reply). I was addressing your smart-assed reply and my job is done. Carry on.
    1
  48.  @bethjohnson8414  And now you're back pedaling. Everyone here can see what you meant by that response, deny it all you want as if it were an honest, legitimate question.
    1
  49.  spacedog101  🐑 Baaaaaaa!
    1
  50. @Donald Jabba the Trump: Why do you people (LOTS of people on both sides) act as if there's only 2 choices (extreme liberalism [Cuomo] and extreme conservatism [Trump])? You're limiting yourself to choosing between 2 idiots. Arguing how stupid Trump is (a "true" comment") in response to a "true" comment about Cuomo is like arguing how you'd rather have your head blown off via 12 gauge instead of decapitated by a guillotine. If everyone would stop limiting themselves to these boundaries, there COULD be an actual middle ground found that nearly everyone is happy with. That's kind of the point of voting, assuming you know what you're voting on and not casting a vote based on other peoples' narrow opinions. And I don't mean just YOU. LOTS of people do this [limit themselves].
    1
  51.  @petertraudes106  AND one can EVEN say: 🐑 "Baaaaa!"
    1
  52.  @petertraudes106  🐑 Baaaaa! Nice argument! Anything of substance to say though?
    1
  53.  @petertraudes106  A better idea would be to be grateful for living in a country with so many opportunities to basically do whatever you want. A better idea would be to vote instead of crying, setting buildings on fire, looting and brutally assaulting innocent people when you don't get your way. When decisions are made via voting, not everyone gets their way. That's how it works. Nobody was rioting, looting, etc. when Obama was elected, even though LOTS of people hated even the idea. To add to this argument: in my honest opinion: Obama is MUCH more qualified to be President and MUCH more intelligent than Trump, so don't try to mark me as a "Trump supporter". However, I can act like an adult and accept that I won't always get my way. A better idea would be not condoning criminal activity. A better idea would be to realize that Trump isn't a dictator for life and, again: DEAL WITH IT BECAUSE EVERYONE CAN'T HAVE THEIR WAY ALL OF THE TIME. A better idea would be to stop taking sides as far as extreme liberalism or conservatism. There ARE other options if people would stop supporting one or the other. There's some better ideas other than droning on and on and on and on about something you can do nothing about like a child throwing a tantrum because they were refused a new toy.
    1
  54.  @petertraudes106  Now I'll ask again: do you have anything to say of any substance?
    1
  55.  @petertraudes106  Than (then) again: anything to say with any substance or just your childish schoolyard chant? Do you not see how childish you sound? You aren't even ATTEMPTING an actual, reasonable, rational argument. Just "🐑 Baaaaaaaa!"
    1
  56.  @adamc2867  Lmao...I'm not sure how to take your comment exactly....are you saying you don't like Trump or all BLM "protesters" like KFC? Either way it's pretty hilarious!
    1
  57. That is..terrible. I'm sorry for your loss. And I completely agree. Could you get around it somehow and just start teaching from your home but call it a "BBQ" or something instead? I mean 10 people or less shouldn't be an issue I'd think. (Idk the exact laws as far as something like that wouldbe concerned).
    1
  58. @animeinabox You are the problem as far as what this thread is about (voters using/having a brain). You're speaking as if there's only one choice you can make between 2 available choices and you HAVE to pick one of those 2. That's absolutely ridiculous.
    1
  59. @animeinabox "Vote who exactly? Another narcissistic psychopath?". See? As if your only choices are either voting for "another narcissistic psychopath[ic conservative]" or the brainless, idiotic extreme liberal. There are people MUCH better suited to being a leader you know, but that isn't going to happen unless VOTERS START USING THEIR BRAINS.
    1
  60. @animeinabox Who I voted for isn't the point being made. Unless you can explain how it's got anything to do with the argument being made? I didn't ask who you voted for because: 1) it's irrelevant to the argument being made 2) it's none of my business 3) you've made that (who you voted for) pretty clear already through implication
    1
  61. @animeinabox I made an "assumption" based on what YOU said, which actually makes it an implication, which is an educated guess using reason and rationale...not just a RANDOM ASSUMPTION. And that's ACTUALLY why you're done: because most likely, I'm correct. I COULD be wrong but I highly doubt it.
    1
  62.  @martyk1156  Exactly. So my question is: how exactly is this RACIAL injustice? Because THAT is the narrative being pushed here.
    1
  63.  @marcoschaub8978  See above comment to Cart blossum, as it applies to you as well.
    1
  64. 3:25 "Destroying property which can be replaced is not...violent." First of all, it doesn't matter if it's violent. It matters if it's morally correct. Second of all, if she's condoning this, I bet her attitude would VERY quickly change if it were HER property being non-violently destroyed. Thirdly, what about the brutal assaults? I guess we're just ignoring those now?
    1
  65. @Duan Nengo By far, the best rebuttal (learn to code) I've ever heard! How old are you? 🤣
    1
  66. @Duan Nengo "Bro", what does how much money you make have to do with anything? Insecure much? Because you sound as if you have a SERIOUS insecurity issue if that's your (so called) "argument". Furthermore, no, I don't make six figures a year. I also don't milk cows and blah blah blah. Even if I did, so what? I'd have a legitimate job. And with my actual job, I make a decent-above average living. So what exactly is your point? That you make more money than the average American? Here's a ribbon for you to tie to your forehead: 🎀 Do you feel better now? Because you sound more childish now than you originally did. Good job! 😂
    1
  67.  @SandyWolf-  That day is rapidly approaching I fear. Fortunately, I have no children and by the time this day arrives, I will be dead.
    1
  68.  John Fields  Yep. I don't care so much about conservative and liberal as I do about these "protesters" are nothing more than domestic terrorists.
    1
  69.  John Fields  EXACTLY. 100% AGREED!
    1
  70.  @elainekoteles1948  Yep. Hopefully he/she isn't murdered in the process so they can let us know how everything turned out.
    1
  71.  @einsozialdemokrat1071  Ummmm...no sir, YOU commented on a thread on a video about abolishing police. If that's too difficult for you to understand, it is I who am sorry for YOU . Apparently, I'm not the only one who saw it that way. I think it's much more likely that YOU are the unintelligent one here as opposed to it being everyone EXCEPT you. That's USUALLY how that works.
    1
  72.  @einsozialdemokrat1071  Your little "😂" emoticons don't make you appear intelligent or make you right, as its generally idiots that have to use them to get their "point" across. I CAN and WILL agree that I'm not for either party myself. I'm just saying: you DID comment on a video about getting rid of police and nearly EVERYONE understood your comment the same way I did. Maybe you should think about what you're saying, how you say it and the context with which it will be taken depending on whatever video/page you're commenting on and how comprehension works.
    1
  73. @Nick Arnold What very app? Where are these videos? I want to see them and then you explain HOW you KNOW it's RACIAL injustice. And even IF they are, there ARE going to be a FEW racists always. This is true for ALL races and does not mean everything is DRIPPING with racial injustice and racial injustice ABOUNDS EVERYWHERE, which is what y'all are saying. Where are these videos?
    1
  74. @Nick Arnold GOOD LORD!!! So I should just search YouTube until I find the ones you're talking about? WHAT LINK??? I want to see THE examples you are talking about. Jesus Christ....and you think I'M ignorantly responding. That's pretty ironic.
    1
  75. @Nick Arnold No...you show me. What are you? A complete moron? You show me because then I will have some questions for you about what you show me. Sounds like you don't want to be questioned about anything concerning your claims. How the hell can there be any debate or you show me how I'm wrong if we aren't looking at the same exact examples to compare each others views? I'm supposed to randomly look things up and then question you about things you don't even know what I'm taking about? Or is it that you don't WANT to have to defend your position in a particular instance because you CAN'T? Idiot. Show me exactly where this happened. This is the problem with you f**kheads: you're incapable of logical, reasonable thought so instead you throw temper tantrums ("protests") and constantly do nothing but run off diarrhea of the mouth.
    1