Comments by "American Plague" (@American-Plague) on "" video.

@sensualeye It's got EVERYTHING to do with gender. As Officer Tatum pointed out, if that woman were a man, trained or not, built like that, "she" [he] would be throwing that other guy around like a tag doll.
5
FenwickChick Furthermore, at a certain point, it doesn't matter how much training you have. And it wouldn't matter how much training that guy had, if he were fighting a man with the size and physique of that woman, he would lose. Unless the extremely jacked dude were chain smoking cigarettes all day and drinking grease, then, MAYBE. That is simply a fact and "necessarily true". At a certain point, size trumps any training. Your opponent will simply be too big and too strong to overpower. I don't care how much training a 130 pound dude has. He will NEVER subdue and toss around a 275 pound NFL defensive lineman. It WON'T happen.
4
@Seoul_Seeker Sorry, but at a certain point of difference between weights, you are wrong and no amount of training is going to help. This is real life and not a king fu movie.
3
FenwickChick It IS necessarily true. I don't care that a smaller trained woman can take down a larger untrained man. No way in hell that an average woman can take down an average man. No way in hell that the biggest and best trained woman fighter on the planet can take down the biggest and best trained male fighter on the planet. This is because it IS necessarily true that there are very distinct genetic differences between men and women that give men a distinct physical advantage. Stop trying to give nonsense examples a like "If Freda Foremen fought an average 110 pound man she would win." and acting like that proves there's some kind of equality here, as that IS the point of the video. Of course she'd win because they aren't both within the same skill/ weight class for their respective gender.
2
FenwickChick Oh ok "dude". What SPECIFICALLY did I say that's "not necessarily true"? That it "has everything to do with gender"? It IS necessarily true. That's why an average weight man will ALWAYS destroy an average weight (or even heavier) woman, all else being equal and even if the woman is bigger AND has more training in many cases. So yes, it's "necessarily true" that gender has EVERYTHING to do with it. Unless you're fighting the lightest, most untrained man against the biggest, best trained woman and the man loses. Even this would only serve to highlight how unfair you must make it for a woman to win. If I missed your point here, please do elaborate what EXACTLY isn't "necessarily true".
2
FenwickChick To be more clear: all things being equal, a man will ALWAYS (I can't stress that enough) ALWAYS destroy a woman at hand to hand combat. Even most times where all things AREN'T equal and are in favor of the woman.That is an indisputable FACT and is "necessarily true" and has been from millions of years ago right up until the present day.
2