Comments by "No Fate But What We Make" (@SonoftheAllfather) on "Kamala Harris Thinks "Rural" Americans Don't Have Smartphones and Scanners and Stuff" video.

@cassidy99ful I'm an ethnic nationalist, and only the most deranged of Hitlerian Nordicists think Slavs aren't White.
4
@kingsleyoji649 eXcEpT yOu'Re wRoNg. An Englishman in the 13th century would have considered an Italian a European. Western civilization itself wouldn't exist without the Greeks and Romans. White means European. I don't care what Jimbo in Alabama thought in 1960. His was not the consensus among Europeans and never was.
4
@uingaeoc3905 The only way that you could argue that a "high caste Indian" is White is if you completely distort the definition of White and conflate it with being marginally Caucasoid, in which case, you would need to add in a plethora of other groups into the definition of White. When people say White, they mean European, and that is still people's subconscious understanding of it, because that is what it has always meant. People who manipulate the definition of it tend to do so deceptively only because it's politically expedient for them. For example, you don't like that Harris uses her racial identity as a political weapon, so you do some mental gymnastics and voila, she is White, and therefore a hypocrite. Harris is pathetic, but so is your line of thinking.
3
@craxd1 If Jamaicans actually understood the definition of ethnicity, they would realize that ethnicity and race are intrinsically linked. You can't be ethnically German without being White/Caucasoid. You can't be ethnically Igbo without being racially Sub-Saharan Black/Negr0i0d. Race and nationality are also linked if you go by the actual definition of a nation, which is a group of people with shared ancestry , culture, language and history. Emphasis on ANCESTRY. Instead most people go by the corrupted civic (liberal) understanding of a nation, which is not really a nation at all, and is just a step away from full-on globalism.
3
@onusgumboot5565 And yet many Native Americans still refer to themselves as Indians.
2
@williamghost1516 "Mediterranean" isn't an ethnic identity. If you're Greek or Italian or something, you've been considered European since the dawn of Western Civilization. White means European and basically has since the time when racial groups were observed and classified. Most of the people who are peddling the narrative that the definition of White has experienced extreme shifts are deceptive Eurocidal neo-Marxists who want to subvert and destroy White identity because they think it was designed to establish and maintain white supremacy.
2
@williamghost1516 Just because you're born in a barn doesn't mean you're a horse. You do a genetic test and it will say nothing about indigenous American ancestry. Their ancestry goes back at least 20,000 years on this continent. Most of us have ancestry that goes back less than 200 years, or 1% of the time theirs have been here. But keep doing those mental gymnastics and subverting their indigeneity just because you feel uncomfortable that their ancestors were here long before ours. Leftists and liberals are doing the same thing in Europe: trying to subvert the identity and indigeneity of indigenous European groups to rationalize the invasion of millions of non-Europeans. It goes both ways.
2
@onusgumboot5565 Your anecdote doesn't prove that indigenous Americans as a whole have an issue with the term. Many still refer to themselves collectively as Indians or American Indians. One of the largest Native American civil rights groups is still called the "American Indian Movement." The push against the term was mostly initiated by people who aren't even indigenous American. It was politically correct language policing, no different than the push to begin referring to Black Americans as "African Americans," which has now pretty much lost all its steam. But I actually think in the particular case of Native Americans, that the PC redefinition is clearly more relevant, which is why I use it.
2
@efxnews4776 People used to give less of a damn in the US, but then Marxists infiltrated our cultural institutions and waged an ethnocultural war against the Euro majority. So there are few options for us. We will either become racially conscious and collectivized or get disintegrated and destroyed by those who are.
2
@efxnews4776 Interesting. I appreciate speaking with you. You aren't deceptive or a cvnt. That goes a long way in my book, regardless of your ideological positions.
2
@williamghost1516 Most historical dictatorships eliminated their intelligentsia because their intelligentsia stood in opposition to the goals of their agenda. The Western intelligentsia does not stand in opposition to the goals of the neoliberal globalist hegemony. They are part of the dictatorship itself, and something tells me they aren't going to eliminate themselves. Their useful idiots worship them and think they should have all the power and thus make all the decisions. Since you're a centrist, you'd probably be receptive to someone like Thomas Sowell. His take is that the government is not only trying to de-educate the populous, but indoctrinate them. “The power of the intelligentsia is demonstrated not only by their ability to create a general climate of opinion that strikes fear into those who oppose their agenda but also by their ability to create a climate of opinion which richly rewards those political leaders whose decisions are consonant with the vision of the intelligentsia.” ― Thomas Sowell, Intellectuals and Society So how are white people supposed to get a "proper education" and lack ignorance if the entire intelligentsia is dominated by people who support an agenda that seeks to demonize and destroy us?
2
@uingaeoc3905 It's Aryan, not Arian, and I'm fairly certain I know more about the Yamnaya culture and the Indo-European (Kurgan) migration hypothesis than you do. Regardless of the several millennia-old link between some Europeans and people of Indo-Aryan descent, the idea that the people of the Indian subcontinent are racially/genetically the same as Europeans is ridiculous. Not to mention, White means European, not just Caucasoid or marginally descended from ancient Yamnaya. At it's highest concentration, the admixture in Europeans that can be attributed to the Yamnaya is 0.5% The most common haplogroup in Europe is R, while in India it is H. Indians are not White, and no one says they are, and that is because White means European.
1
@uingaeoc3905 Also seriously doubt that Brahmins consider themselves to be White. Go and look at some examples of Brahmin Indians and you'll very rarely find an example of a typical European phenotype.
1
@BoozeAholic I agree that culturally she isn't Indian or Black, but that is irrelevant to what she is genetically. People here are talking about genetics. She isn't racially White just because she acts like a "typical American Liberal Lefty White girl."
1
@cassidy99ful That's ridiculous and I think you're parroting leftist propaganda that has been subliminally implanted in your mind.
1
@uingaeoc3905 That's funny, because the only Brahmin member of Harris' family was her maternal grandfather who was TAMIL. LOL shows how little you know about what you're talking about. Indians, including Brahmin Indians, are of proto-Asian (Dravidic) origin with ancient West Eurasian admixture. In general, the higher the caste, the more West Eurasian admixture, but even the Brahmin caste is still on average ~95% proto-Asian. The West Eurasian migration occurred thousands of years ago and since diffused into the Dravidic speaking population. And no, I don't confuse the issue of identity as it pertains to DNA. A person can "identify" as literally anything, but that doesn't mean that's what they are in reality. And don't think you can weasel you way out of your original claim, which was that "high caste Indian" is White. You pointed to part of their ancestry (the Aryan migration) as the reason which they "refer to themselves as white" which again denotes GENETICS. Now you're trying to say they just "identify" as White (which is also not true) and separate what they identify as from the DNA they possess. Being White is being European, and being European is about GENETICS.
1
@efxnews4776 Yeah it's possible to be racially mixed and show a typical Euro phenotype, but in general, mixed people look phenotypically what they are: mixed. Phenotype is just an expression of genotype, after all. Harris looks like a Black/White/Indian mix, because that's that she is. But she's certainly not White. She's only 1/4 European at the most.
1
@efxnews4776 Well said.
1
@efxnews4776 Although I have heard that there are some ethno separatist sentiments from Euro Brazilians in the south of the country because they feel like the northern part of the country ( which I understand is mostly indigenous) is a drain to them economically and votes overwhelmingly for Marxism.
1
@efxnews4776 Economic resentment can ultimately become racial resentment if one or many groups are constantly parasitizing others. Would the theoretical separatist state not be capable of self-sufficiency? It seems like the south is the economic powerhouse. Would the problem be lack of agricultural output?
1
@kingsleyoji649 European is White. You're deliberately ignoring that fact. The guy you're referring to said no one even considered them European. Go reread the comment.
1
@kingsleyoji649 I know who you're responding to. You speak of ideology when your rhetoric is intrinsically neo-Marxist; you sound like Noel Ignatiev, who was a disgusting anti-white ]udeo-Marxist who sought to bring about the destruction of "whiteness" i.e. the white race. He wrote a book called "How the Irish Became White." Sounds like you read it. Funny, because I thought several Irishmen signed the Declaration of Independence and were included within the 1790 Immigration and Naturalization Act, which limited naturalization to free WHITE persons of good character. "Whiteness" is not something that can simply be endowed on someone when they act a certain way. White means European and always has, and those who are genetically European are White. Take some more copium and crawl back under your bridge.
1
@kingsleyoji649 Weak response. If you think being White is something that isn't genetic, you're a social constructionist. If you think "Whiteness" is some kind of subjective sociocultural pseudo-identity used to establish a racial hierarchy, you believe what neo-Marxists believe. End of story.
1
@jaysonstinson9458 They wouldn't be cvckservatives unless they denied the reality of anti-whiteness and engineered Eurocide which (if successful) will inevitably have a disastrous influence on the cultural and political destiny of the West. All they can do is live in a state of denial and cry about the Left's use of race as an effective political weapon like the cowardly weaklings they are.
1