Comments by "No Fate But What We Make" (@SonoftheAllfather) on "Communisms Greatest Trick: Convincing the World The Communist Threat Stopped Existing" video.

@schrodingerssnufalufagus9292 You just listed a gaggle of neoconservatives who are controlled opposition and largely motivated by their loyalty to their own tribe's ethnic state.
5
@schrodingerssnufalufagus9292 "They're intelligent, which means they tend to be at the forefront of a lot of major movements" East Asians also tend to be very intelligent. Why are they so less likely to be involved in political and cultural subversion, activism, propaganda, chicanery, financial despotism, etc.? There is simply no valid excuse for their disproportionate involvement in these things. Why are you trying to defend them?
5
The_Jaguar_ Knight The horseshoe theory is defunct because it characterizes the political spectrum as linear instead of multidimensional, which is lowbrow and completely simplistic. Vaguely "right" libertarians pretend that any ideology that espouses authoritarianism/statism is by definition leftism, which is completely ridiculous. This would mean that ancient empires and monarchies were leftist. This also completely ignores social ideological differences and the ideology's main goal for humanity and how it should be organized. People like Tarl dishonestly characterize anything that isn't liberal as leftist, even though that characterization is reductionist, unnuanced, and unsophisticated. There are several fundamental differences between fascism and Marxist state socialism. To pretend like they are the same thing just because they're both authoritarian is idiotic.
5
@schrodingerssnufalufagus9292 80% of them vote for the Left despite the fact that most of them have been in the U.S. for generations. According to the ]evvish Virtual Library re: the New Left: "the ]evvish aspect of the movement was twofold: a disproportionate participation of ]evvs in the leadership and sometimes also in the ranks." So even they admit it. The ones on the "Right" are generally just gatekeeping and promoting neoconservatism. They puppeteer are the lowbrow Evangelicons who believe in their biblical lies. You can't make a decent argument, so you have to try to attack me and compare me to them. You're stuck in this boomer-tier capitalist/communist false dichotomy. They are not your friend. You are a means to their end.
5
@schrodingerssnufalufagus9292 They are an ethno-religious group (ethno denoting ancestry) and their state is legally for them and them alone. "Muh principles" lol. Okay, you should tell them you share their principles and want to immigrate there. See what they say. I don't care if they are anti-Marxist. They are pseudo-right lolberts and neocons who use America and the West as puppets for their own agenda. Prager LOL he advocated for communists from the USSR to immigrate to the U.S. because the Soviets wouldn't let them go to their ethnic state. The so-called "refuseniks." Now they and their descendants are dug in and pushing every form of disgusting anti-whiteism, Marxism, social degeneracy, you name it. Thanks Dennis. What a true American. lol Pundits like Lil Benny and Prager are gatekeepers. They are full-on ethnats and identitarians when it comes to their own people, but they require all their "fellow whites" to be good civnat lolberts and think only in terms of "values" for our own countries. You sound desperate and insane talking about Iran and penguins and pushing idiotic strawmans. "dO yOu rEaLLy bEliEvE tHaT"? reeeee
5
The_Jaguar_ Knight I agree with him that neoliberalism is a failed ideology and I also agree that it's pathetic and dishonest when libertarians try to argue that AH was a leftist. Glad you like the channel though.
4
The_Jaguar_ Knight I only required five minutes to dismantle the narrative that fascism is a far-left ideology. I noted differences that not one single person has actually addressed and been able to counter. I can only assume the reason is because people who think fascism is far-left are incapable of countering the points I made. If fascism is so obviously a far-left ideology, it wouldn't take five hours to make the argument. Libertarians and mainstream conservatives routinely make the argument that fascism is far-left (and compare leftists to fascists), so I reject the notion that the video I made "is all about shooting down strawmen." The video you are promoting and want me to watch implies this position right in the title, and also assumes that people who don't agree are in some form of denial. The entire point of that video is to draw parallels between NatSoc and communism, so why are you now backpedaling and denying that you think they're basically the same thing? Just own what you believe. The first "giant hole" you claim exists in my video was actually not even a main point of the argument, so the idea that it could even conceivably be a "giant hole" is ridiculous. It was an ancillary comment at best, but it is still true. In 1919, Marxist state socialism was not part of the preexisting global order. I never claimed that it was in 1919 (talk about a strawman). I implied it was when Germany attempted to destroy it (Operation Barbarossa) in 1941, because by then it objectively was. The two main superpowers after the war were the U.S. and the USSR. Half of Europe essentially belonged to the Soviet Union after the war, and the post-war period was defined by the struggle between Western liberal capitalism and Marxist state socialism. It is not a coincidence that the Chinese Communist Revolution occurred directly after the defeat of Nazi Germany. So yes...seriously...those two ideologies (and the states they controlled) did constitute the preexisting globalist order at the time of WWII, and the NSDAP did want to destroy them both. AH was well aware of the Marxist threat in the early 20s, when he wrote: "Marxism rejects the aristocratic principle of Nature and replaces the eternal privilege of power and strength by the mass of numbers and their dead weight. Thus it denies the value of personality in man, contests the significance of nationality and race, and thereby withdraws from humanity the premise of its existence and its culture." Does that sound like an ideology that was compatible with his worldview? I think not. The other "giant hole" you claim exists perfectly illustrates your lack of understanding of orthodox Marxism as an ideology. It is well known that Marxism promotes the dismantling of racial and ethnic identities and replaces them with more obscure and vague umbrella identities that are conducive to world communism (the ultimate goal of Marxist state socialism). It also seeks to destroy religious identity through the implementation of state atheism. All globalist/internationalist ideologies must by default break down identities that hinder their implementation and create these post-ethnic/racial/religious identities. The Soviets did this (the very term "Soviet" itself is a politonym designed to replace ethnic identities that previously divided the peoples who came to live under the Soviet regime). Look up Sovietization and the "New Soviet Man." Mao and the CCP also did this by promoting the umbrella post-ethnic identity "Chinese" as well as promoting "peasant nationalism" (a class-oriented form of "nationalism"), which had nothing to do with ethnicity. They have absorbed other ethnic groups such as the Tibetans and Uyghurs and attempted to Sinicize them. The EU (a Soviet-style system) is currently doing this by promoting a "European" regional/civic type umbrella identity. America and all civic (liberal/inclusive) states have this kind of post-ethnic integrationist identity as well, because civic nationalism is basically globalism lite. Other universalist ideologies attempt to do this as well. Universalist religions, for example. The process of Arabization and Islamization are married at the hip. Many non-Arabs group essentially "became Arab" because Islam is so ingrained into the Arab culture. That is what is meant by Marxist is ethno-integrationist. Fascists do not attempt to integrate or absorb other ethnic groups. They attempt to separate and preserve them. You provided one example, the Khmer Rogue, which seemingly contradicts this notion, but while it's often portrayed as a genocide, what happened in Cambodia is more aptly defined as classicide or politicide. This is evidenced by the fact that the Khmer Rouge were not chiefly concerned with eliminating or separating themselves from other ethnic groups, they were more concerned with destroying the previous ruling class (a prescription of Marxism), the majority of which were ethnically Khmer. They also destroyed and expelled ethnic and religious groups which held a disproportionate amount of power in Cambodia (Han, Viet, Muslims, Buddhists), but it was all about power, and these groups only constituted ~20% of their victims. You mentioned the Viet, but they literally only constituted 1% of their victims (~20,000 people). If ethno-separatism was their main concern, 8 out of 10 of the people who died at their hands would not have been ethnically Khmer.
4
@schrodingerssnufalufagus9292 You're so full of BS. Lol "aLtHoUgh tHeY fAvOr eThNiC ]evvS" reeeee Stop defending them. You sound pathetic.
3
The_Jaguar_ Knight I liked his comment.
2
@nunereclipsereborn What evidence do you have that the NSDAP were Roman Catholics or the Vatican supported them? I am aware of the treaty signed between the Vatican and Germany and Pope Pius' anti-communist decrees. With that said, I think the idea they were clandestine supporters is a stretch to say the least. Most of the Western world sought peace with Germany and hated communism in the early 30s. The fact that the Vatican did as well says very little. The fact that they remained neutral during WWII speaks more to their symbiotic relationship/dependence on the Italian government (which was allied to Germany) than it does about their true positions regarding the events that were occurring at the time. The international press has basically tried to characterize anyone who didn't openly disavow and contribute to the war effort against the NDSAP as a de facto supporter. They continue to use the same social stigma/divide and conquer tactics today when they polarize populations about issues that matter to them. "siLenCe iS viOLeNcE" reeeee.
2
The_Jaguar_ Knight Watch my video entitled "Muh Fascists are Leftists" and try to make a cogent counterargument.
1
@m.hughmungus121 Never been tried or never been achieved? I agree only with the latter.
1
@kamaeq Christians made up the majority of both NatSoc Germans and Italian fascists. ]evvs represented a massively disproportionate amount of the Bolshevik leadership and supporters of Marxism in general. So yeah... I don't think you're entirely correct.
1
@kamaeq Sounds like some insane dogmatic purity spiral BS to me.
1
@kamaeq The Hebrew Bible is a pack of lies. Watch my video about the Philistines.
1
@kamaeq Anti-Bible = basically ALL historical and archeological evidence. The idea that the Hebrew Bible is BS is not particularly "brilliant or new."
1