Comments by "No Fate But What We Make" (@SonoftheAllfather) on "Coward Jeff Sessions Will Jail People for Pot but Not Traitors Like Abedin or Clinton" video.

Everyone talked about Gowdy, but he's proven himself to be a neocon establishment shill on more than one occasion. Too bad, because I know he would seize control of the DOJ and dominate anyone that he chose to prosecute. The problem is that he would allow politicians and deep state types to continue with their corruption and criminality.
13
He's too old and inept for the office he holds. The DOJ needs to be purged and discipline needs to be restored. Trump needs to appoint an absolute savage in order to get control of it. The question is who?
13
@LB7414: Gowdy "spearheaded" the Benghazi organization, spent 40 million in taxpayer dollars, and produced how many indictments/convictions? How about Fast and Furious? How about the IRS targeting scandal? No indictments. No convictions. Sure, he is entertaining and routinely embarrasses and owns people on camera, but after 5 years in Congress, he has done NOTHING to put an end to government criminality. My opinion about Gowdy has nothing to do with Trump's alleged failures in "certain areas." Mueller is not a liberal shill per se, but he is an establishment shill, just like Gowdy. They protect the ruling elite and the upper echelon actors in the ABC agencies and don't hold them to the same legal standards as they require of others. These deep state types know they won't get hammered, so long as they have their shills running the show. This unwillingness for leadership to maintain integrity and standards is the reason why we have agencies that are mutinying and are politically biased. Their smoke and mirrors facade isn't working anymore, and people are starting to wake up to the neocon/RINO agenda, which is not congruent with the desires of the majority of the Right. Once people get to Gowdy's level, they are only one of two things: with the establishment or against it. The establishment transcends party lines. Neocons and neoliberals are the same thing. You think Trump is despised by neocons and neolibs alike simply because of his boorish behavior? Not likely. He IS an outsider. One that they can't control with money and knows their games.
4
Christian Anderson I'm working on it bro. I'm kind of a perfectionist. I would just go on and rant like Styx, but because I'm not interested in getting fired, I can't expose my identity. Therefore I want to have something that's visually engaging, and all that editing takes a lot of time. I'm not a computer genius either. I had to teach myself how to create and edit video. I'm going to try for something like BPS, but that dude is like a double major in film and video editing, I swear. Lol
4
That is really dependent upon what police force you're talking about, especially now that some states have legalized or decriminalized the recreational use of weed. The problem with the modern day is that you've got dash cams, microphones, bodycams, cell phones, social media, etc. That basically makes it so that cops must go by the letter of the law instead of the spirit of the law in most instances. At that point, to "look the other way" is not "wishful thinking," it's a question of possibly losing their job and being criminally prosecuted for dereliction of duty. Most cops I've known don't give a fuck about weed, unless you're being incredibly blatant and dumb, driving around and smoking etc. But if it's between busting you for weed or losing their job, they'll obviously take the former every time. I don't think that's very unreasonable. To say that marijuana arrests are the "bread and butter" for "state, county, and local police" is pretty much false and an extreme generalization. Law enforcement is specialized at the state level. The trooper's "bread and butter" is speeding citations, DUI, etc. A game warden's "bread and butter" are poaching citations. County sheriffs and municipal cops would be more likely to bust someone for weed, but many cities and counties have their own legal code that busts down petty use and possession to an infraction. Either way, most cops will destroy weed or paraphernalia if they can do it without someone they don't trust knowing about it. Most the people that get busted for weed these days were assholes or they committed other crimes in addition to unlawful possession. Either that or they're selling or possessing more than a reasonable amount.
3
Unless the replacement was a savage that would be impossible for them to publicly demonize.
3
@Mikaylan Simon: Gowdy is an establishment shill. He's a great prosecutor, but he wouldn't dismantle his own department if he were in charge of it, even though that is exactly what needs to occur. He's been in politics too long. He has too many corrupt allegiances. Trump also offered him the job and he refused, if I remember correctly.
3
LB7414 What more could Donald Trump possibly want for himself? He already satiated his narcissistic autism by winning the presidency. Now he wants to endear himself to the American people. I don't care if he does it for his own ego, or he does it out of true genuineness, the result will be the same: a better America. It's true he knows their game and that makes him suspect, but if he were really a big business corporate establishment shill, they would have supported him and wouldn't be pulling all stops, using every method possible (to include their corporate media propaganda engine) to demonize him.
3
Erron Black None of the people he truly wanted accepted the position. I think Gowdy would be in there if he wanted the job.
2
LB7414 Lol turn off the CNN and go outside before It's too late. Assange said it best: "I actually feel quite sorry for Hillary Clinton as a person. Because I see someone who is eaten alive by their ambitions. Tormented...literally to the point where they become sick." Leftists never called Trump mentally ill or a racist before he won the presidency and triggered you all into oblivion. An arrogant prick, perhaps, but not mentally ill. You and the entire Leftist empire have shown your true colors in the last few years. At this point, you're akin to petulant children; willing to align with anyone, destroy anything, and tell any lie to get what you want. Nothing but hurricanes of butthurt temper tantrums and pathological derangement. That's about all. Peace out.
2
@Mikaylan Simon et al: Everyone talked about Gowdy, but he's proven himself to be a neocon establishment shill on more than one occasion. Too bad, because I know he would seize control of the DOJ and dominate anyone that he chose to prosecute. The problem is that he would allow politicians and deep state types to continue with their corruption and criminality.
1
@Return of Zeus: Cool story, bro. Can I hear it again? Do you have time?
1
LB7414 Money? Trump has quite a bit of that. Power? Trump is arguably the most powerful man in the world. Politics should be less about personality and more about policy. Actions speak louder than words, and I really don't give a shit about Trump's narcissism. In this day and age and political climate, you essentially have to be a narcissist to get to the top in politics. This is compounded by the fact that modern politics is essentially a popularity contest. I really couldn't care less if a politician is likable or not. I care about results. If they put Americans first and make this country better, they're alright with me.
1
@LB7414 "Thus it must be admitted that in the economic sphere, from the start, in all branches men are not of equal value or of equal importance. And once this is admitted it is madness to say: in the economic sphere there are undoubtedly differences in value, but that is not true in the political sphere. It is absurd to build up economic life on the conceptions of achievement, of the value of personality, and therefore in practice the authority of personality, but in the political sphere to deny the authority of personality and to thrust into this place the law of the greater number — democracy." ~Adolph Hitler Looks like you agree with Hitler on this one. Not surprising. Whatever his personality may be, Trump was elected by the people of the United States. Many looked past Trump's personality and listened to his platform. Clinton, like most neoliberals, spoke with a silver tongue, but said nothing. Her ideological platform was bankrupt and stagnant. Maybe you aren't a Leftist, I've just never seen a true Rightist put feels before reals in such a pathological manner. A true anti-authoritarian Rightist doesn't care about personality and the perceived "authority" it falsely ordains upon a leader. True Rightists care about facts, action, integrity, and results.
1