Comments by "No Fate But What We Make" (@SonoftheAllfather) on "No, We're Not on the Precipice of Civil War: Chill Out" video.

@Con man He married a Hispanic girl moved down to a border town in Texas until they got divorced, and then he shockingly moved from that rich multicultural paradise. Now he talks about civ-nat libertarian drivel as if it would work in a place that isn't 96% Euro-American like Rutland, VT.
5
@Con man Come to think of it, Styx and Bernie Sanders both share a common delusion. Living in a relative ethnostate has made both of them believe that their ideology would work at a national level. Just as Styx thinks minarchism would work in a multiethnic country, Bernie thinks that the Nordic model would work here. Lol he fails to realize that the Nordic model only worked in the Nordic nations because the Nordic nations were filled with Nordic people. Now that they've accepted multiculturalism and mass invasion, their system will collapse due to the eternal truth of race realism.
5
@shadowthehedgehog3113 Yugoslavia is a perfect modern example of how multiethnic nations collapse into ethnic civil warfare if and when no group is the clear dominant majority. All European majority countries are heading towards that situation, including nations that constitute indigenous European homelands. Study the term Balkanization and realize that "diversity" as the term is used in the Western world only means the inundation of non-Europeans into European-majority nations. Only countries with European racial majorities are expected to allow themselves to be replaced and marginalized and for our identities to be reduced to nothing more than some meaningless citizenship or value set instead of being based on a common ancestral/genetic link.
4
Maldrannon Well said. I watch Styx because he covers most important topics, does so six days a week, and most of his views are reasonable. But his unwillingness to accept race realism or even so much as assign importance to racial issues can be outright nauseating. Adherence to civic nationalism only represents a slightly slower death kneel for our civilization. Cultural, moral, and political values are all correlated to race. This is backed by irrefutable evidence which he willfully ignores. His other questionable characteristics and beliefs (Satanism, sorcery, etc.) only serve to make it more difficult for me to find value in his opinions.
3
@shadowthehedgehog3113 India has a massive amount of ethnic and religious conflict, but the domination of the Indo-Aryan Hindu majority keeps it relatively stable. Imagine if half of India was Muslim though. It would descend into civil war and Balkanize. Either that or one group would defeat and subjugate the other group, or maybe one group would ethnically cleanse the other. Nearly every multiethnic state has some level of ethnic conflict, some of it violent. Just look at Africa, where European powers drew up nation-states rather idiotically to sometimes include hundreds of adversarial ethnic and/or religious groups. Hundreds of separatist movements exist throughout the world, most of them ethnic, many with armed wings. Many first world nations even have ethnic separatist movements such as those in Quebec, Scotland, Basque country, Flanders, Crimea, etc. The reason the U.S. has been successful is because those values you mentioned were enforced by a dominant majority demographic (Euro-Americans) who required immigrants to acculturate and adhere to those values. As Euro-Americans increasingly become a dwindling minority and other groups continue trying to subvert and destroy the dominant American culture, values, language, and institutions, the entire project will collapse. Culture, values, religion, and average political proclivities are correlated with race. When a country becomes too diverse, it becomes divided and weak. The Latin prefix "div" means separate. Divorce is a word that shares a prefix with diversity. Strong marriages don't typically end with divorce. Strong countries aren't typically overall diverse, either.
2
@shadowthehedgehog3113 I know the difference between religion and ethnicity. However, in some cases, ethnicity and religion are closely linked. A state can Balkanize along religious or even political lines as well, it is just usually ethnic. I also didn't say that the Indo-Aryan ethnolinguistic group is ethnically homogenous, but they do represent a religious majority that serves to unify the country. In India, the division is more religious instead of ethnic, but the principle is largely the same. You are in denial if you think a half Muslim, half Hindu India could survive. Pakistan and Bangladesh separated from India because of their Muslim majority. There is still sectarian violence in Kashmir due to its Muslim population. Moreover, the fact that homogenous societies also have had historical conflicts is irrelevant. Multiethnic societies still have an inherent flaw that serves to divide and weaken the country from its very inception. Multiculturalism is plainly insane and doesn't work at all, let alone does it help to strengthen a nation. But now I see what you are, and I am diametrically opposed to what you stand for: multiculturalism and left-wing globalist, which are destroying Western civilization. You incredulously denounce and try to sanctimoniously marginalize the legitimate desire of unique groups of people to have independence, probably even more so if they are a European group. Ethnonationalism and monoculturalism are the most natural form of state organization. It creates the most harmonious and stable societies in our current age.
2