Comments by "No Fate But What We Make" (@SonoftheAllfather) on "Netanyahu and Israel Attack Soros, Side with Hungarian Nationalism" video.

The Jews, with their unqualified capacity for falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, are the biggest hypocrites on the face of the Earth. They need to be nationalist to protect their ethnic state, but they need multiculturalism and Leftism to destroy all of their enemies.
140
Nicolas M. I used to think the exact same way as you, mostly because I didn't want to believe it and I was uncomfortable with the notion of agreeing with "conspiracy theorists" and "Nazis." Then I just started seeing such disproportionate representations of Jews involved in every large-scale shady plot against Western culture. The more you research, the more shady Jews you find. Don't look now, but almost a quarter of the U.S. Senate has Jewish ancestry. 3 Supreme Court Justices. 5 of the "Big 6" film studios founded by Jews. Anywhere you find postmodernism, you find Jews in disproportionate numbers: modern "artists," modern "architects," cultural Marxist sociologists. And perhaps their most disproportionate and corrupt representation: international banking cartels and the financial sector. 7 of the top 10 in Forbes' The Most Powerful People in the Financial World are Jews (thanks Catholic church). They developed atomic weapons and also facilitated the Cold War by providing the Soviets with top secret documents that allowed them to compete with the U.S. nuclear program. They're behind so many poorly disguised initiatives to destroy Whites and occupy so many positions of influence and power in Western countries while only representing 1-2% of the population. They're a shady desert tribe, no better than the Saudis, maybe even worse. And like the Saudis, they are thinly veiled to appear as our allies, but their ulterior motive is to subvert and destroy us. You talked about Jewish tribalism and Ignatiev and that made me remember that he was allowed into Harvard Graduate School as a known anti-White Marxist criminal without a bachelor's degree. Yet somehow, he was admitted and allowed to lecture before he even had a master's degree. And people attribute Jews being successful solely to their high average IQs. No. Jews conspire together and elevate their own, even if it's blatantly obvious. They NEVER fully adapt to host nations. "Host" nations: they're like a virus. They're the original multiculturalists, expecting to live within a nation as an autonomous entity, only being part of the nation in ways that are advantageous to them, and in every other way, causing dissent and attempting to destroy that nation. Have you ever heard of a Jew in the military? A Jewish cop? A Jewish firefighter? Anything personally dangerous to them and not exploitative? Doctors maybe, and if being a doctor wasn't lucrative, they wouldn't do it. Is it any wonder they've been persecuted for thousands of years and have been expelled from over 100 nations in recorded history?
9
Yourmom Disapproves Tribalism is just looking out for the interests of your own people. Sometimes that involves exploiting other peoples for the gain of your own, but Jews have taken this concept to the next level. They've mastered the art of deception and the aspiration for supremacy under the guise of "tolerance" of all non-Whites along with their own deluded victimhood identification.
6
@ Nicholas: Indeed it is. Sometimes I question my own sanity, and wonder if I'm just a masochist, always researching things that are the clearest detriments of White culture, nations, institutions, legacy, exceptionalism, etc. as well as those that are responsible for said detriments. Know thy enemy, is the purpose, I suppose. But the sad (and maddening) truth is that I find Jews in nearly every corner and crevice as both the engineers and facilitators of our decline. I'm not even surprised to see this pattern anymore, I almost expect it. It's almost refreshing to find someone who isn't a Jew that is deliberately trying to fuck over European White civilization. My research started as an attempt to prove the conspiracy wrong. Then when I realized it was true, I began trying to advance that narrative by cherry picking (dishonest, I know, but at least I'm coming clean now). But then I realized...I didn't even need to cherry pick. It's just a pattern that can't be denied. They are such a small overall percentage of the population. There is just no other explanation. Eugene there made a really good point though actually: "If the anti-ZOG brigade spent as much time forming strong tribes of their own as they do bitching on the internet that the other team are cheating, they'd be able to resist just fine." This is very true. The first step is the convince yourself and others of this distasteful reality though. The aptly named "red-pilling" on the topic of the JQ.
5
Also, Rhys. I am not saying the Jews don't have a certain cultural penchant for being successful. Henry Ford wrote about this ad nauseum. The Jews have many admirable qualities, and I would not be bitter about their disproportionate control over wealth if they used that influence to strengthen and support Western civilization and White countries, as any grateful group of immigrants would do. Instead they do the opposite, and try to destroy Western culture and demographically alter our countries at any opportunity. Two additional points here: one is that you are assuming that the methodology in which they obtained their power is entirely merit-based, which is not entirely true. "the fact of Jewish solidarity renders it difficult to measure Gentile and Jewish achievements by the same standard. When a great block of wealth in America was made possible by the lavish use of another block of wealth from across the seas; that is to say, when certain Jewish immigrants came to the United States with the financial backing of European Jewry behind them, it would be unfair to explain the rise of that class of immigration by the same rules which account for the rise of, say, the Germans or the Poles who came here with no resource but their ambition and strength. To be sure, many individual Jews come in that way, too, with no dependence but themselves, but it would not be true to say that the massive control of affairs which is exercised by Jewish wealth was won by individual initiative; it was rather the extension of financial control across the sea." -Henry Ford. Secondly, Jews conspire together and elevate their own, just as every tribe does, but there is a societal difference...and it is that White cronyism is criticized as "White supremacy," while criticism of Jewish cronyism is called "anti-Semitism." The same goes for every ethnic group in this country besides Whites. They can be as nepotistic as they want, and we cannot. That hypocritical dichotomy is the recipe for White hegemonic overthrow in White majority countries, and it was the Jew that engineered this tactic. Jews even say they are White when it's advantageous to them, and then define themselves as separate otherwise. So, you see, they play by different rules. In order for there to be true meritocracy, the rules need to be the same.
4
Eboni Fragaria you are eloquent and well spoken. Keep speaking the truth and redpilling the normies.
4
Nicolas M. You are highly skilled in rhetorics as well. Keep studying this and you will find the truth. There is a lot of engineered information regarding this intended to dishonestly frame the Jews, but there is also a lot of credible information that cannot be denied.
4
@ Virgil: Also, "anti-nationalist globalist ideologies" are disproportionally Jewish. Jews support this ideology everywhere but Israel. Just take a look at who is running the banks and the flow of wealth. Look at who is in government. Look at who is running Wall Street. Think about the link between money and Western imperialism. Imagine in theory how a Zionist might attempt to obtain global dominance, and you'll be imagining EXACTLY what they are doing in practice.
3
Lionel Nathan de Rothschild "Although the state of Israel ratified both the United Nations Refugee Convention of 1951 and its Protocols of 1964, in practice it has been a reluctant host to asylum seekers. Less than 1% of refugee claims have been recognized by Israel, one of the lowest rates in the western world. Additionally, the Israeli government routinely refers to asylum seekers as "infiltrators" and has incited negative public opinion against them.More than 90% of asylum seekers in Israel are from Eritrea or Sudan. Though Israel has recognized fewer than 1% of asylum seekers as refugees, it upholds the principle of non-refoulement, acknowledging that some asylum seekers are in danger if returned to their home countries. Therefore, the state policy toward these asylum seekers is one of temporary non-deportation, officially referred to as “group protection.” The only right this status gives them is a temporary stay on deportation, and they must renew their visas every 1-3 months. Additionally, the state has employed various tactics to coerce asylum seekers into "choosing" to leave on their own, including detention (see below), limited access to medical care, and withholding of their wages." This took me about 5 seconds to find. Do some research before you make foolish comments, especially those that insult another's intelligence.
3
Lionel Nathan de Rothschild https://www.ardc-israel.org/refugees-in-israel
3
Anecdotes are evidence of fucking nothing. That "same old tired crap" is something you still haven't refuted, despite your incessant sniveling. You having travelled to Israel means nothing. I've been to France. Does that make me an expert on French demographics and immigration policy? Of French multicultural acceptance and the nature of Frenchmen just because I've talked to a few people about it? I've been to Paris, can I say that the demographic representation that I observed in Paris is the same for the entire country? No. If the entire country was like Paris, France would probably be around 20% Sub-Saharan African and 20% Middle Eastern, but of course, that is not so. Your "experience" is a crock of steaming shit in comparison to actual EVIDENCE of official Israeli demographic government policy. THAT is what highlights their true motives and national outlook. As I said, read my earlier comments on this thread if you want to know my opinion as to why Jews are influential and why it is important. It is a combination of their own merit and their hyper-tribalism i.e. they elevate their own. However, criticism of Jewish cronyism, not unlike any other criticism of Jews, is outside the realm of publicly acceptable judgment. Like every other minority group in the West, they can be as nepotistic as they like and play by different rules, and any criticism of this hypocrisy or double standard is falsely contrived and labeled as racism or hatred. I also said that if Jews held the power which they do, yet used it in ways that were not destructive to Western civilization and White homogeneity, I would have less of an issue with it. The Jews want their cake and to eat it too. They always have. That is why they have been expelled from over one hundred nation states in recorded history, and they essentially had to occupy Palestine to establish their own ethno-state. They deliberately demand preferential treatment, take advantage of other tribes, and refuse to practice what they preach. They've been doing this for millennia and despite rampant persecution, they insist of continuing this pattern, which is not evidence of ignorance, but of adamance. As long as they continue this behavior, "anti-Semitism" i.e. valid criticism and wariness of Jews, is not only justified, but necessary for survival.
3
@lapamful: The article is linked above in the subsequent comment. Open your eyes, my friend. Just because something is copied and pasted does not mean it isn't the truth. Based on your criticism thus far, I would think you would rather me use other sources as fact instead of my opinion, anyways. Interesting how you would automatically dismiss something just because the information doesn't fit your narrative. Kind of like how you automatically dismiss my opinion because you insist I'm a "neo-nazi." Hmm... I sense a cognitive bias. "This doesn't include the 850,000 Jewish refugees Israel took in 1948 from Arab lands after they were ethnically cleansed because of Arab anger at the recreation of the state of Israel. So this already puts Israel up there with Germany in terms of migrants. But no doubt you'll have something to say about why that isn't true either..." I doubt that ethnically Jewish refugees were even counted as refugees if they fled to the state of Israel, however Israel is one of the only country's that requires genetic testing to immigrate to there, so I wouldn't put it past them. Meanwhile 720,000 Palestinians fled or were forcibly deported by the new Israeli government in 1948 when their lands became Israel. Did they take any of these folks back in? Less than 1% of them. Your argument really doesn't disprove my claim that they are an ethno-state. If Germany took in 850,000 ethnic Germans living outside Germany, this would not be considered ethnic diversity. If Israel took in hundreds of thousands of Somalis and granted most of them asylum, as Sweden has done, then they would be considered a multi-ethnic state. But of course they won't do that. They know that Somalis are incompatible with their society, but they surely want Europeans to take Somalis, even though the same incompatibility exists. Also, just because someone is physically in Israel, doesn't mean they are a citizen of Israel. The country of Qatar seems very diverse too, but in early 2017, Qatar's total population was 2.6 million, and only 313,000 of them are Qatari citizens.
2
@lapamful: "You are the sum of your opinions." Opinions are subjective. They do not add up to define a person or necessarily their entire viewpoint unless those opinions are 1.) uncompromisingly steadfast and 2.) interpreted as unquestionable a certain thing by an observer. My opinions are neither steadfast, nor are they commonly interpreted correctly. You see my criticism of Jewry and Israel and you automatically equate this to Anti-Semitism, which is then automatically conflated with neo-Nazism. But tell me this, what do you consider a person that criticizes U.S. imperialism and White-American influence and meddling? Do you automatically assume the person criticizing is a communist? An Islamofascist? A racist? A supremacist? Yeah, you probably wouldn't consider them any of those things. Just someone with a opinion, and probably a valid one. Yet Jewry and Zionism are immune to criticism. You are currently confirming this. Others have accurately classified my views as White nationalist. You, on the other hand, having little tact or nuance and prone to false equivalence, would conflate a WN with a NN, when there are in fact some rather large dissimilarities. "Criticism is based on facts. Racism is based on fiction." Again, this all depends on interpretation. Fact: "A black person is more than twice as likely to commit a crime than a White person in the United States." Fact or fiction? Criticism or racism? Some would say this is fiction and racist. Others would say it is a fact, and racist. Still others would say it is fiction, and not racist. And some might even say it is fact, and not racist, like myself. Your argument is that if something is a fact, it cannot be interpreted as being racist. That is patently false. Facts are interpreted as being racist all the time. You interpret my opinions as being false, therefore racist. It is entirely subjective. Additionally, your argument seems to be that all racism is based on fiction and not facts. As if a supremacist can only develop these notions from stimulus that is fictional in nature. That is also patently false. "OPEC's control of the oil supply thus controlling the price of oil" If OPEC holds absolute control over the oil supply and the price of oil, and therefore the flow of wealth, why do oil prices fluctuate? Why would OPEC allow oil prices to plummet? If oil is king, and controls all wealth, why is Venezuela in the current state it finds itself? Why didn't OPEC raise oil prices to prevent their member state from imploding? Rhetorical questions. This is an absurd argument on your part. International finance controls the world market, not any one commodity. The oil industry is a hugely powerful factor, but it is not the most powerful.
2
@Virgil: "this is war, one day we will just meet them on the battlefield." LOL. Ok buddy. And you say I'm paranoid, emotional, have schizophrenic delusion and require medication? Painfully comical virtue signaling, and the worst part is that you probably don't even know how to operate a weapon. :)
2
@ Virgil: I'm actually mostly anti-war, anti-authoritarianism and anti-statism. I'm strongly anti-genocide, anti-eugenics and the like. If anyone is painfully deluded and making vast assumptions, it is you. All I want is for White countries to be left to their own devices, not puppeteered by Jewish financiers, proselytized by Islamists, or invaded by foreign cultures. I simply want Whites to prosper and not be subverted from within and attacked from the outside by those that wish to destroy or replace us. I only seek to destroy those that are existential threats to my people and my country and cannot be reasoned with or convinced to leave us in peace. This thread was a viable exchange of ideas before you graced it with your low-IQ pleb-tier commentary.
2
@ Nicholas: Orthodox Judaism is almost worst in principle and lack of reform than similar literalist forms of Islam. The main difference between the two is that, as you said, Islam makes it the mission of every Muslim to proselytize, whereas the Jews are the opposite. They have sought to remain exclusive in nature.
2
Virgil Hanson you didn't bring any decent arguments to the table. All you did was attack and mock me. Lol. That is really of no value to anyone whatsoever. I think it's hilarious that actual national socialists are generally more open to viable debate and less trolly, pathetic and uncompromising than someone like you. You operate in an opinion corridor and you're too ignorant to realize it. It's quite comical, really. :)
2
@ Virgil: You "took it down?" LOL How so? "I stated truthfully that Israel is one of the most multicultural countries on the planet by virtue of the fact that it has a population that is 20% Muslim Arab, 5% Christian, Druze, Bahii Arab and other, and the Jewish population is multi ethnic in the extreme, considering that nearly 50% of the Jews are of Arab, African, North African, or Asian background. But of course you ignored me when I made those statements." No, you actually didn't say anything like this at all. THIS is an actual argument, unlike anything you have provided thus far. Here is the thing about the Palestinian Arabs; they are an unwelcome presence to the Jewish majority of Israel. Everybody knows this. The vast majority of them don't even consider themselves Israeli, even though many of them hold Israeli citizenship. They refer to themselves as Palestinian Arabs, not Arab Israelis. Everybody knows this. Many Arabs living within Israel have actually denied the Israeli citizenship they were offered. Everybody knows this. They are in Israel because when Israel became a state, the Israelis would have had to forcibly deport or kill them in order to get rid of them. Everybody knows this. The animosity the Jewish government has shown towards the Palestinians, and their own bitterness of the establishment of the Jewish state, has caused them to become an essentially autonomous population within Israel. The Druze and the Negev are the only Arabs that even openly embrace Israeli citizenship, and they are less than 5% of the population. Despite the Palestinian presence, the state is 75% ethnically Jewish, and they would no doubt be more ethically homogenous if they could do so without open genocide or displacement. Israel has both immigration and emigration laws that promote ethnic homogeneity. Demographers are very determinant as to who is considered Jewish and who is not, using rabbinical law as their basis for assessing "Jewishness." That doesn't sound like any other state in the world to me. Can you imagine if British immigration officials were also demographers that were this concerned with "Britishness," and you could only immigrate back to Britain if you had an ethnically British grandparent? What other state has anything like the Law of Return? It basically gives ethnic Jews automatic rights to citizenship. Israel is even politically referred to as the "Jewish State," which practically defines it in common usage as an ethno-state. Israel is an ethnic state by law, and would be 100% Jewish if they had it their way. Someday, especially if a Palestinian state is established, they will be even more ethnically homogeneous. How is this not ethnic nationalism? How do the Jews not show hypocrisy, promoting multiculturalism and mass immigration everywhere in the world other than in Israel? I don't think you took down the argument at all.
2
The Jews were forced to take in Palestinians at the inception of their country. They would never allow the equivalency of 20% of their population of Muslims enter today, and they would have good reason. It is academically dishonest to compare Israel's Arab population to other countries for this reason, and you know it. Yet, they expect White nations to continue taking in Muslim migrants, despite all the problems they are causing. "the only thing they have in common is that they share a religion" This is very untrue and academically dishonest as well. Israel requires that at least one grandparent was genetically Jewish. Jews have been exclusive for millennia, so they can be genetically determined to be ethnically Jew, and you know it. Being a Jew is not just practicing Judaism. That is retarded. Israel also favors certain Jews they see as more purely Jewish, according to rabbinical law. Russian Jews, for example, have been discriminated against by Israeli demographers because they see them as ethnically and culturally different. "Israel has proven that a multi-cultural society can work." Really? I don't think they have at all. I think that their multiethnic society is bound by Judaism and Zionism. Without those things, it would implode into civil war and chaos. I think they still exist in a tumultuous and precarious situation. They have practical apartheid and racial segregation against their Arab minority. Very progressive. Western White nations are a better example of a successful multicultural experiment, and they are all fucked too. Multiculturalism doesn't work. It's adverse to the very element of human nature.
2