Comments by "No Fate But What We Make" (@SonoftheAllfather) on "Stephen Breyer to Retire, As Dems Approach a Probably Disastrous Midterms" video.

@davidhunt8685 In 95% of cases, a "woman of color" will be a judicial activist.
17
What gender and race do you think the replacement will be? I think it'll be either a muh woman of color or another ]evv.
10
@SkylineFTW97 Indeed, stereotypes are based on observed patterns. People don't just fabricate them out of thin air. If nonwhites didn't vote overwhelming for the Left and disproportionately involve themselves in far-left political activism, those stereotypes would not exist because they'd be devoid of validity.
6
@davidhunt8685 Agree to disagree. I think a lot of them are mainly motivated by hatred and vengeance. That is why they are so easily exploited by the elite and so enthusiastically carry out their agenda.
5
@davidhunt8685 Idealism and hippie drum circles won't save us. These people have no ethical code at all and are thus incapable of adequately administering justice. They have no standards when it comes to how they use the power they obtain. John Adams said: "we have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge or gallantry would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution is designed only for a moral and religious people." As an irreligious person, I would argue that the "religion/religious" part is not particularly valid, but the morality/moral part most certainly is. There is a reason leftist judges are called judicial activists and rightist judges are called constitutionalists or constructionists. Leftist judges routinely exercise little restraint and routinely abuse their discretion, even if their interpretation blatantly contradicts statutory or constitutional law.
5
Hopefully Republicans don't make the confirmation process for his replacement a cringefest. I'm guessing they will though.
5
@SkylineFTW97 Yeah. Sometimes political awareness is depressing. People who are paying attention can predict the idiocy and cringe before it even happens, and then it happens anyways. It's rare that something surprises me anymore. Especially something that pleasantly surprises me.
4
@funkydiscogod Oh they did? That makes sense.
3
Yes, but ultimately the qualification will be to be a leftist/judicial activist (yes, those things are basically the same thing). And yes, I realize that means the same thing as muh woman of color in 95% of cases. But they aren't going to put some conservative Black or Hispanic woman on the bench.
3
They aren't a fringe. They are the majority of the left, and half the country is left of center.
1
@brofist1959 BS. The center seems larger than it is for a number of factors, but it's an illusion. Most centrists and politically indifferent people just refuse to admit which way they lean, but they lean. Look at Tarl. He doesn't claim to be conservative or right-wing but he's not voting for Dems. That is how most centrists are. You can look at demographics and voting trends and realize that the country is way more than 30% blue or left. Nonwhites are now 40+% of the population and as a whole, consistently vote 80% blue/left. So there is 32% of the country right there, and that's not even including whites who consistently vote blue/left, which is at least another 15-20% of the country. Bottom line, even if you don't make assumptions from voting trends, the far left isn't a fringe anymore. They constitute a fairly large minority of the country, especially as the country continues to "diversify." We are on an increasingly leftward trajectory, partially because of demographic shift and partially because leftists have an overwhelmingly disproportionate amount of institutional power. They're dug in like ticks everywhere showering us with relentless propaganda every day and converting more people into their ideology. And people like you are still in denial and claim that they're just some tiny lunatic fringe.
1
@brofist1959 Demographics matter. It is the leading factor in whether a person votes left or right. If only nonwhites voted, we would be living in a de-facto one-party country. Demographics dictate political destiny. Only a fool or a liar would deny it. And even if you aren't looking purely at demographics or voting trends, look at the context i.e. the subject of this thread. Are the people who are demonizing Machin and demanding he get rid of the filibuster a "cringe fringe?" No they are not. They are the vast majority of Dem voters and influencers. More than half of Dem voters have far-left views, and many don't even know it because they're drones and their positions are never challenged. There is no legitimate way you label the far-left a fringe any longer. The average Republican is now like a Kennedy liberal and the average Democrat is socialist lite. Full on Marxian socialists are platformed by the broader liberal establishment. They are too great in number and have far too much influence to be dismissed as a lunatic fringe. But I know all of you lolberts on this channel are in denial of the truth. You actually think you can turn Hispanics into lolberts before it's too late. You're wrong.
1
@seinfan9 That would be so cringe.
1
@davidkeys4284 I'm not discounting the benefits of religiosity. I'm not anti-religious by any means. I'm just not a member of any organized religion myself.
1
@WinterPhoenixForestKirin It's pretty common still on channels like this one, where people are still in denial about demographics and race.
1
@MrKago1 Crypto commies at the very least.
1
@redditfaggerton3165 If they expose a candidate for having anarchic or radical views, it might create some bad press. But half the country will still make excuses for them.
1