Comments by "No Fate But What We Make" (@SonoftheAllfather) on "Screw the Christchurch Shooter and Screw the Mainstream Media" video.

  1. That's not the narrative they want to push. They want advance narratives that defend and trivialize attacks against any group that holds the label of oppressor in the cultural Marxist dichotomous framework. Doing so facilitates their overall campaign to inundate the West with these toxic divisive groups who will cause destruction, fragmentation, and war. It's the globalist plan in action. Divide and conquer.
    29
  2. @______ They don't want us to live in peace in our own lands. Then we would be strong and independent and have more immunity to parasitism and chicanery. They want to weaken us by forcing us together, making us hate and kill each other, crossbreeding us, destroying our identities, and eventually seizing authoritarian control over the degenerated animalistic coffee-colored mess that remains. Then they'll despotically lord over humanity as if it were their livestock for eternity.
    7
  3.  @TheSebi99p  I see war and chaos as an inevitable eventuality of the multicultural hell project, which was deliberately engineered to destroy the West. It's true these people didn't do anything "wrong," and I don't condone their slaughter, but when I look at the overall picture, I have a hard time believing Muslims in the West are not fully aware they are part of a deliberate invasion and colonization effort. Many of them (and especially their imams) blatantly gloat about invading Europe, replacing Europeans through migration and overbreeding, and Islam seizing control of the Western world. The fact that our traitorous governments are complicit in the globalist hell project doesn't mean they should be given a free pass to conduct this effort to conquer us. It should be a widely-held belief that they are an existential threat, because they are.
    7
  4.  @TheSebi99p  I'm not implying that you want to open the floodgates, and I get your argument. My view though, is that Muslims are mostly toxic and incompatible with our society. So establishing a relationship with them in any meaningful sense, especially in the context of them living as a rapidly expanding minority in our countries, is largely impossible. Muslims don't wish to learn our ways. They are supremacists who think our ways are perverse and evil. They are an uncompromising people who have provided the final proof (if any more was needed) that multiculturalism is a failed project. They don't want to debate, and when they do they just deceive and gaslight their criticizers.The "average joe" Muslim in the Islamic world believes that Sharia should be the law of the land, and should apply to non-Muslims. The "average joe" Muslim in the UK thinks that homosexuality should be illegal. The "average joe" Muslim thinks spousal abuse should be legal. The "average joe" Muslim thinks Israel should be wiped off the face of the Earth. These are not radical viewpoints, they are widely-held beliefs among Muslims because they are in accordance with the Quran, with Islamic law, and the example of Muhammad. So-called "moderate Muslims" don't out their imams as "radicals" because most of them AGREE with the dogmatic poison their imams spew.
    6
  5. And the irony is that Turkey is considered liberalized by Muslim standards and the U.S. has a huge military presence in Turkey. Many of the bombing sorties that kill Islamic fundamentalist targets in the interest of Zionism are flown out of Incirlik Air Base.
    5
  6. The media will frame this attack as white supremacist terror inspired by a benign YouTuber and a Black neocon, but whenever anyone frames an Islamic rape or murder of Whites as racism or supremacism based on Islamic scripture, they gaslight that person as a phobic bigot and rush to the defense of Islam and "muh moderate Muslims." The media is perpetuating this type of violence by enforcing these double standards on Whites. People are tired of it, and this is only the beginning.
    3
  7.  @TheSebi99p  I would argue that Islam is a socio-cultural and political entity in and of itself. That is how pervasive and all-encompassing the ideology is; it controls nearly every facet of a Muslim's life by design. It is not the restrictiveness that compels them to violence, it is the foundational principles of Islam and the example of Mohammed. If Jesus were a psychopathic mass murdering warlord, a polygamist, a supremacist, a slaver, a rapist, and a pedophile, as Mohammed was, Christians would likely be more like Muslims. It still took Christianity centuries to reform. Islam is not going to reform. Too many Muslims consider Islamic scripture and Mohammed's example to be the final, unaltered command of God. The real radicals within Islam are those who seek to reform it, and they get issued fatwahs for their troubles. The fact that you know a Muslim who is irreligious is anecdotal and therefore irrelevant, sorry. Muslims like that are looked down upon by the Muslim majority. Moreover, there is always an exception to the rule, but that doesn't refute the rule. That is always the argument of the Left, and it is idiotic. It is how the Left and globalists justify mass invasion: (#notall) even though 1 in 10 are jihadists who are a real and active threat and 7 in 10 hold viewpoints that are completely incompatible with our widely accepted values. But a couple are okay, so it's inhumane to not let them invade and colonize us and parasitize our systems.
    3
  8.  @TheSebi99p  It isn't designed to be reformed. It is considered the final and unaltered word of God, and Mohammed's example was considered perfect. Try telling a Muslim that slavery or pedophilia is morally wrong when their prophet, the supposed "perfect man," did those things. It is pointless arguing with a person who believes that, and most Muslims believe that, whether they admit it to you or not. Also, you are calling them radical when most are in fact fundamentalists. It may seem semantic, but think of every other religion: do we call Christians who follow a literalist interpretation of the Bible "radicals?" No, we call them fundamentalists. Calling a person a radical or an extremist (when they're only following the fundamental principles of the ideology) serves to obfuscate and defang the truth about the foundational principles of their ideology. As I said, the real radicals are those like Tawhidi and Hersi-Ali who are trying to reform Islam, and they are getting hunted by their fellow Muslims for it. Also, Maajid is a Trojan horse. He coined the term "Islamist," which just means a typical Muslim, really. It's just more taqiyya. He also wrote a book called "Radical" when he knows full well his ideology was fundamentalist, and radicalism is a departure from foundational principles. He is also a globalist, an ideology which leads to more Islamic colonization and supremacy, and he knows it. Just because "good Muslims" exist doesn't mean they belong in our countries or that they wouldn't side with their own when all the chips fall. Even "good Muslims" are an existential threat to any civilized society, because the children of Islamic immigrants generally become more fundamentalist than their parents due to the natural effects of social alienation. They are an alien culture that belongs living in their own countries, dealing with their own problems. "Your solution is us vs them. This leaves no room for any compromise, either we kill them, or they kill us." It is already us vs. them, whether you like to admit it or not, bro. We should not have to compromise with foreign groups within our own nations, even if they are capable of compromising, which Muslims are not. They should either conform or get out. You need to stop applying these unreasonable standards of "tolerance" for yourself and your country. Talking to them will achieve nothing. We've been talking for years, and all they do is demand unreasonable concessions because they have become accustomed to using our "tolerance" against us to demand special treatment. Then they demonize anyone who criticizes them or their 7th century death cult as a bigot with a phobic mental illness. They are a group that have proven they are incapable of fully adapting and they cause far more detriments to our nations than they do benefits. They should be repatriated to the countries of their origin or ancestry. We don't have to kill them to remove them.
    3
  9. War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Diversity is Strength.
    1