Comments by "No Fate But What We Make" (@SonoftheAllfather) on "Tim Pool Hosts Kanye and All Hell Breaks Loose" video.

@damian_cross I think it's generally immoral to assign collective guilt on a group as well, but let's not forget that they (and those who mindlessly defend them) bank on our instinct...hell...they even exploit our instinct to not assign collective guilt...because they know that being "individuals" in certain instances allows them to obfuscate when they are in fact operating in confederation (as a group) for some purpose. The "not all" argument only goes so far when it comes to this group, given the overwhelmingly disproportionate power that their nepotism and ethnocentrism has helped them obtain. And of course, any group that wishes to maintain their power must establish a set of double standards for themselves. And this is why it's been made quasi-forbidden and socially dangerous to even acknowledge, let alone criticize their power (and the way they obtain and hold that power). Also, let's not forget that the most influential cultural and political ideologies that members of this group have created (and championed en masse) are completely reliant on assigning collectivized group guilt/onus. They have decided who is eligible to be assigned with that collectivized guilt and who isn't (they didn't make themselves eligible...shocker, I know). The sad fact is that the vast majority of them have absolutely no moral issue making broad generalizations about YOUR group if it's somehow expedient to them. But if you do that to them, they accuse you of being evil and wanting to destroy them.
14
@markzuckergecko621 The whole "not all" (correlation doesn't equal causation) argument is kind of lowbrow when talking about group characteristics if you really think about it, because how is anyone supposed to address group characteristics without generalizing? When a person makes generalizations about a group, it's usually assumed that they aren't talking about that entire group as if it's a collective entity. The only people who constantly nitpick whenever a generalization is made are those who are trying to deny some group characteristic even exists (or minimize it as something that's irrelevant). Jordan Peterson often says something like "well, men are more assertive" and the feminist interviewer will instinctually respond with "wELL nOT aLL mEn aRe aSseRtiVe!" Obviously, JP was not intending to say that all men are more assertive than women. He's saying men are more assertive in general, and that this personality trait produces outcome disparity. And here's the thing: the feminist interviewer KNOWS he's not saying making an absolute statement. She's just trying to deny the fact that there are differences between men and women because it undermines feminist narratives about equality and discrimination. This carries over to statements made about ]evvs. When people are saying "]evvs control Hollyweird," they aren't saying that all ]evvs have control over Hollyweird or that everyone with any power in Hollyweird is a ]evv. They're simply saying that in general, Hollywood is controlled by members of this group.
5
@jasonx7501 "why focus on the ]evvish part" is no different than asking "why focus on the Black part" when considering the disparities in violent crime statistics. The reason why we focus on the group they belong to is obvious: we are trying to ascertain if there is a reason why members of certain groups behave in certain ways, especially when their behavior is negative, whether it be violent, subversive, exploitative, or whatever. If we can ascertain the reason, we can hopefully work to correct it. Pretending that group identity/membership has nothing to do with behavioral differences will not change the fact that it does. Willful ignorance doesn't help anything or anyone. Refusing to even acknowledge a problem exists makes any solution an impossiblity.
4
@jasonx7501 Well, first of all, I didn't say anything about race, I said culture. But since you're conflating the two, I guess that's a good segue into acknowledging that there is a positive correlation between the two. That said, the truly ignorant position is the belief that there is no link between behavior and culture. How else can you explain away 13/52 if not for violence being glorified and normalized in their little urban subcultures? It's clear that all you're capable of intellectually mustering is various tired versions of the irrelevant "nOt aLL!" argument (correlation doesn't equal causation). Let me make this very clear: we are NOT talking about causation, absolutes, or individuals here. We're talking about general patterns of behavior that vary between individuals that belong to certain GROUPS. Ideologues like you will casually acknowledge positive group behavioral patterns without a passing thought (like the pattern of ]evvs placing emphasis on educational acheivement, for example). You'll even acknowledge negative group behavioral patterns if that group is safe to criticize (whites, for example). But when it comes to acknowledging negative group behavioral patterns within any "protected group," you recoil into a state of tactical ignorance. Stereotypes (positive and negative) are based upon observed, quantitative patterns. In other words, they oftentimes have real merit despite not being causal or absolute. You know all the negative stereotypes of ]evvs. I'm not going to bother listing them because I know you're just playing the hatchling and haplessly trying to bait me into some "gOtcHA yOu aNti-SemiTe!" moment. Try being honest with others (and yourself) for once. You might actually win an argument sometime.
3
@mikeviking1000 You might think of them as part of your people, but you can bet your bottom $hekel they don't think of you as part of theirs.
3
@mikeviking1000 Uh oh, the "not all" argument again. That's only the 100th time I've heard that argument in the last couple days.
3
@Batmans_Pet_Goldfish Hahaha no, Marxism and neo-Marxism (cultural Marxism/critical theory).
2
@Batmans_Pet_Goldfish LOL both Hirschel HaLevi and Henriette Pressburg came from rabbinical lines. They were crypto to the max, and converted only for the social status, so gtfoh with that "tHey cOnvErTeD!" narrative. At the end of the day, communism and capitalism are two sides of the same coin. Ahem...the same $hekel, that is.
1
@bustacap3791 Godwin's Law.
1
@bustacap3791 LOL yes it does, obviously. You proved that in the very first sentence you uttered. To bland half-witted normies like you, so-called "anti-Semitism" cannot be unmarried from AH and the NSDAP even though animus towards ]evvs as a specific people existed 2000 years before AH was even born.
1
@markzuckergecko621 "pEopLe wHo jUsT sO hAppEn tO bE ]evvish hAvE a vErY lArge OvErEpResEnTaTiOn iN hOLLywOOd fOr rEaSoNs tHaT aRe cOmPLeTeLy rAnDom aNd nOn cOnSpiRaToriAL." Get real, man. Believe me, if any other group that only represented 3% of ANY national population held such an overwhelming amount of power within that nation, that group would get accused of ethnocentric nepotism and supremacism all the time. Let's do a thought experiment. Imagine if there was a country where Germans were like 3% of the population, and yet they held the kind of power and influence that ]evvs hold in the US. Now imagine that several powerful members of this tiny German minority, wielding their immense power in culture and politics, displayed an observable pattern of open hostility towards the majority population and its traditional values. Now imagine that, within this society, it was considered verboten to so much as criticize this German minority or accuse it of any ethnocentric nepotism or supremacism. In fact, if you even suggest that these Germans might have a collective interest of any kind or might be working in league based on their shared identity, it is YOU who is the evil hateful conspiracy theorist. HAHAHA what kind of absurdity are we allowing here? This group has a PREPOSTEROUS set of sociocultural double standards and they rely on schmucks like you to uphold them.
1
@jasonx7501 Me: explains the reason. You: "tHeRe liTeRaLLy iS nO rEaSoN." The reason, again, is trying to ascertain why members of certain groups display certain tendencies, especially when those tendencies are considered negative. We view these negative tendencies as problematic, and we seek to correct the problem. No problem can be corrected unless it's first acknowledged as a problem. I personally think there are cultural reasons for why ]evvs display certain tendencies that are considered immoral within our society. These cultural traits are passed from parent to child, and no one is able to criticize or address them to make any positive change. All ingroup criticism is passed off as "internalized self-hatred" so that the negative traits are never corrected interiorly, while all outgroup criticism is passed off as "antisemitism," so the negative traits are never corrected exteriorly.
1
@bustacap3791 You're truly a perfect example of the maxim: "better to remain silent and be thought a fool than speak and remove all doubt."
1
@jasonx7501 I originally said culture and then you conflated that with race. So no, you didn't "correctly address the things I believe." You mischaracterized what I said, doubled back like a deceptive rat, and now you're trying to gaslight me. LOL Stating a simple fact proves nothing about everything I believe. Race being correlated with culture is a fact, and can be proven with this simple thought experiment: if there are more Chinese people in any given area, will there be more or less Chinese culture in that area? The answer is obvious. More Chinese people = more Chinese culture because race/ethnicity is positively correlated with culture. It isn't causative, it's strongly and positively correlated. This isn't rocket science, it's obvious. But people like you are so brainwashed, you can't even admit simple truths. 13/52...yes. It's a horrifying disparity which can't be fully blamed on poverty alone, because similarly impoverished non-Black groups do not commit nearly as much violent crime. So what is the cause? Calling me some tired epithet won't change the fact that 13/52 is an indictment and suggests a serious cultural problem within "diverse" urban subcultures. As I said before, you know every negative ]evvish stereotype, so there is no need for me to list them. You asking me what they are is transparent tactical ignorance. Getting triggered by my refusal to list them proves that I was right: your purpose in asking me was merely to try to bait me into a "gOtCha" moment. You failed though, because you aren't as smart as me. I alter that word because comments that contain the unaltered spelling of that word get censored by YT. This is because YT allows groups like the ADL to provide "special input" for how YT algorithms will remove "hate speech." So yeah, they have no special status or power at all. LOL you just can't mention them in a YT comment without eventually having your comment removed or shadowbanned.
1
@bustacap3791 So everything that I write is not "formed in my own head," but everything you say is. Solid argument there, pleb. Your low-IQ screenname matches you perfectly.
1
@jasonx7501 Kid? lol I'm probably older than you. You're a leftist trolling a libertarian's channel, and that is clear because your automatic instinct to everything is "rAciSt!" I didn't conflate race and culture. You did, and I used your false conflation as a segue into establishing that there is, in fact, a positive correlation between race and culture because it's an objective fact that there is. You don't even have an argument here. All you can do is lie, misrepresent everything I write, and spew talking points and insults. The 13/52 thing is not based on an inaccurate survey from 1994, you absolute cretin. The 13 is taken from the 2020 US census and the 52 is taken from the FBI's Uniform Crime Report Table 43a, which is released every year. It's clear you're incapable of admitting the truth (that culture influences behavior) because then you would have to admit that members of certain groups commit more violent crime, and that behavior is due to culture. So instead you just lie and make excuses for the disparities. Anything to remove accountability from the criminals. mUh sYsTeMic rAciSmz mUh oVeRpOLiciNG No one ever said race alone is a causative factor for criminal behavior. I said culture is, but because race and culture are positively correlated, race can easily be misinterpreted as the causative factor, even if it technically isn't. I am twice as intelligent as you. I'm bouncing you around like a basketball here. You have no argument.
1
@jasonx7501 Pointing to FBI crime statistics is not racist vitriol you ignorant wretch. You're the kind of person who, when their dogma can't be squared with reality, ends up believing both and seeing no contradiction. It's the kind of cognitive dissonance often seen in creationists when faced with evolutionary history. So while you know very well that culture influences behavior, you'll deny that fact when analyzing negative societal outcomes in Blacks. But with a group like ]evvs or Asians, you'll attribute their comparatively positive societal outcomes to aspects of their culture, such as the reverence of education, the nuclear family, and gentility.
1
@mikeviking1000 Find me one of them that puts America before Israel then. And not the ones who use "America" as a proxy term for the global liberal empire that includes Israel. Find me one that is a genuine American nationalist. I'll save you the time. This magical ]evv does not exist. Ben Shapiro is about the closest you're going to get, and he's a neoconservative Israel-1ster.
1
@ryang2573 Ethnocentrism is woven right into the fabric of their psyche with their notion of "chosenness."
1