Comments by "No Fate But What We Make" (@SonoftheAllfather) on "No Transgender People in the Army: Who cares?" video.
-
365
-
96
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
6
-
My point is that comparing the disparity between male and female suicide rates with the disparity between the transgendered suicide rate and literally any category of people is ridiculous. 4 times the rate of suicide could literally mean 4 in 100,000 as opposed to 1 in 100,000. So, no, in this context, 4 times the rate doesn't really amount to a massive disparity unless the rate is already fairly significant to begin with. The average suicide rate in the U.S. for all people is 13.2 in 100,000. The transgendered rate (at 40%) would be 40,000 in 100,000 in that context. That is 3,030 times the normal rate. And you're comparing that to 4 times the rate? What fucking universe are you living in? Oh right, the one where "there's no evidence that muslims pose a greater threat to US safety than their own citizens"
You're just grasping at straws. You are making ridiculously inane points, and then you have the audacity to be sanctimonious and patronize people that are actually able to logically reason. I called you out on your snarky little attitude, calling grown adults "children" and telling them to "shush," and that is somehow just as condescending? lol okay.
To my knowledge, you haven't refuted any of my points whatsoever. No matter how much desperate apologist virtue signaling you partake in, it isn't going to change the basic nature of reality. Transgenders being banned from the military is completely logical and will probably be good for transgendered people in the grander scheme of things.
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Saito Keritich
I am:
1.) a combat veteran
2.) a person that works with veterans with mental problems professionally, including transgendered individuals.
3.) a person that has close friends and family that have suffered from various mental disorders associated with military and combat service.
4.) a person that has 3 children, all of whom are very well adjusted.
You are:
1.) an internet troll.
2.) a low-ability person with a cognitive bias of illusory superiority i.e. Dunning-Kruger effect
3.) a person with an egocentric bias resulting in cognitive dissonance, namely a belief perseverance, rendering you incapable of deductive reasoning.
4.) a person with seemingly no anecdotal, personal, or real world experience concerning the military, military members and veterans, psychological disorders, or identity crises.
I wonder who the voice of reason is here? I wonder whose opinion an average person would trust concerning this matter? (Rhetorical question). Fuck off, now.
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@ Kristen B: Also, I don't expect you to understand this because you've likely never been in the military, but it is really no place for social experiments. There are some trans people in the military, and perhaps they join at a higher rate than "cisgendered" people, but their motives for doing so could be easily attributed to their need for hormonal "therapy" and sex change operations. The military is a K-select, fully volunteer force that has the luxury of excluding a wide variety of people with known physical, mental, emotional, and behavioral problems. You could make the argument that the military discriminates on any number of people they exclude for various issues. People that were once drug abusers, for instance, are "able-bodied." No one cries about discrimination when the military excludes them. A person that has a disorder known to cause suicide rates that are thousands of times higher than the national average should not be charged with the defense of our country and subjected to the mental rigors of military service.
3