Comments by "No Fate But What We Make" (@SonoftheAllfather) on "Fox News"
channel.
-
33
-
24
-
24
-
17
-
16
-
11
-
11
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
It's so clear that the establishment needs to get purged. Americans voted for right-wing populism, which is closer to actual conservatism than the GOP's own platform. The American people have been lied to and abused for decades. I'm not just talking about conservatives here. Liberals have been abused as well by these centrist neocon/neolib warmongering globalist establishment shills.
Now that a reformer is in office, someone that actually wants something different instead of "business as usual," all of the establishment swamp creatures show us their true colors. They don't want change for the better. They want to continue being the puppets of corporate interests and banking cartels because that it what behooves them.
The power structure goes something like this: international banking cartels>multinational corporate monopolies>corrupt establishment politicans>the deceptive media>the plebs
All the money is in globalism and war, and the banks and multinational corporations know this. So they buy their politicians and their corrupt mainstream media, and while the establishment politicians are waging proxy conflicts and selling out the American people with globalist trade agreements, the corrupt mainstream media paints any dissenting threats to this power complex as a racist or a fascist or a White supremacist or a misogynist or a Russian espionage agent or [enter political epithet]. And the plebs are too damn ignorant to see what is happening.
We could have had REAL healthcare reform, REAL tax reform, a REAL effort to stop proxy wars and interventionism, REAL infrastructure development, REAL energy independence, REAL national debt remittance. But the corporations and their puppet politicians will not allow any of this to happen, because they don't give a fuck about this country or its people or our future. All they care about is money and power.
This country needs nationalism and fiscal conservatism. It needs it now, and it needs it badly.
The establishment will keep winning until the people start giving a shit. We need to take back the government and remind these crooks who they serve. We can begin by breaking up these corporate entities that are perverting our political system and ruining the lives and futures of our citizens.
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@radwizard:
CA is over 1 trillion in debt and your politicians are actively attempting to replace your population with Third World immigrants, the majority of whom are sympathetic (if not outright supportive) of socialist authoritarianism. Most of the tech industry and larger companies currently in CA would leave if the state gained independence, fearing civil unrest, tax burdens, and possible nationalization.
Moreover, if CA claimed independence, they would be in direct insurrection, and conservative secessionist movements like the State of Jefferson movement could petition directly to Congress for an Article IV, section III state split. A Calexit would end up being disastrous for Leftists, and the northern part of the state would become Jefferson, which is why I support Calexit.
The Calexit movement has also said they would give the entirety of the Sierra Nevada and foothills (north to south) to Native Americans to form their own nation.
So that leaves "CA" as a strip of land from Sonoma to SD and spanning eastward to the edge of the Sierra. The population would be majority lower class Hispanic and more illegals would invade upon the declaration. It would also be economically devastated, under the control of socialists, and at the mercy of Native Americans for water (as they would have sovereignty over the Sierra Nevada). LOL.
The rest of the country would take an initial hit and then be fine. CA would be doomed to suffer the fate of their monumental ignorance.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@user-nx3ei5pl5h
"Intolerance" in the context of sociocultural and political matters is such a foolish term. Here's why: a person can only be truly "tolerant" if they reject and disapprove of absolutely nothing. This means that generally, they have to accept all viewpoints which means they have to have absolutely no conviction that their position is moral or correct. The other person capable of this is a complete moral relativist and someone without any conviction whatsoever as to what is politically the best course of action. So really, everyone is intolerant, but from what I've seen, leftists are usually the ones who like to think of themselves as the most "tolerant," and frame everyone with opposing views as "intolerant," but that means they themselves are taking up a position of "intolerance" against those they've deemed "intolerant." But if you are intolerant of that which you consider to be intolerant, that makes you...intolerant, not tolerant. So you see, it's all subjective. Unless a position is predetermined to be correct or righteous, there is no such thing as tolerant or intolerant. Tolerance is just relativism. It all just depends on where you stand, what you believe, and how willing you are to tolerate the stances and beliefs of others. That is why it is so dishonest when leftists calls people intolerant. All it means is they have positions the leftist doesn't agree with.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1