Comments by "No Fate But What We Make" (@SonoftheAllfather) on "Tucker presses South Africa civil rights activist on why people are leaving" video.

@scorpio1689l That "Dutch ignorance" you talk about is the reason South Africa became a functional society. Once their ability to use land and resources was stripped from them and put under the supervision of the Bantu, the society collapsed. Same thing happened in Rhodesia. Oh and at least the Dutch in the West didn't genocide the Khoisan the way the Bantu did in the East during the Mfecene.
7
@tiptopman116 *You're And no, "diversity" has little to do with indigeneity or nativity. "Diversity" to cultural Marxists just means the presence of non-Euro genetics and the absence of Euro genetics. How do I know this? 1.) Because they include indigenous Americans in their contrived definition. 2.) Because they would define a 100% homogeneously Afro-American city as "diverse." 3.) Simultaneously, they would characterize a 100% homogeneously white city in England (where white people are the indigenous/native population) as lacking in "diversity."
4
False. Unity and homogeneity are a strength. Diversity is an obstacle that can never be completely overcome. If diverse groups exist within a single polity, outcome disparities are inevitable, regardless of conditions. In-group preference is inevitable as well. Hence resentment and conflict is inevitable. The historical and current proof of this is overwhelming, and yet globalists will never admit it, because it undermines the validity of their ideology.
3
@scorpio1689l Yes really. I wish I could respond, because your argument was full of holes. But I'm being censored by an authoritarian left-biased tech algorithm. I even tried using a different account.
2
@Ranger1PresentsVirtualRealms As the guy in the interview said, natural identities always win out. The US was 90% racially homogeneous for most of its existence. We had common values because we had similar heritage, culture and worldview. Within the course of less than one human lifetime, the country has gone from 90% homogeneous to about 58%, and people wonder why the country is so polarized. The idea that some marginally shared values are enough to unite a nation is ignorant. The idea that ethnicity, culture and worldview have no correlation is even more ignorant. Open borders, Open values. Diverse population, diverse values. It's impossible for a country that defines itself by shared values to have extreme diversity.
1
@longfeijiang2449 Religion is a vastly more effective means by which to unite a people. It claims to derive its power from the divine and the holy. Its principles and dictates are held to be commandments from God. Failure to obey is punishable by eternal damnation. There is simply no comparison between the power of that and the power of Americanism.
1
@oliveoil7642 The writing has been on the wall for some time now. Demographic shift equals cultural and political shift, and heritage Americans will not stand idly by while the country our ancestors created, built and maintained for centuries is transformed into a Marxist hellscape and we are transformed into a hated minority. I would say Balkanization would be a godsend, but the globalists will not allow that divorce to occur peaceably.
1
@scorpio1689l YT is censoring my responses to you. I wonder why.
1
@scorpio1689l Can you see the comment I made to Rothnie or are they censoring that as well?
1
@scorpio1689l While it's true the "Z" group you mentioned triggered the event in question, the event in its entirety was still carried out by members of that overarching "B" group. The groups who were displaced and destroyed were the original people, the majority of which were the "K" group, and the whole thing resulted in 1 to 2 million perishing within 25 years. That is an e t h n o c i d e, not a conquest, and that is how the the B group in question became the majority population group in the eastern part of SA.
1
@scorpio1689l My cognitive bias? I am not the one trying to rationalize the g-word by characterizing it as "conquest." The name of the event in question literally translates to the "crushing." K people have been being displaced, replaced and murdered by B people for centuries. The event in question was just the most egregious and murderous. The UN defines the g word as "deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part" and "imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group." I tend to agree. Culturicide and ethnocide are closely related, but the difference is physical destruction. I would love to continue this conversation, but this censorship is out of control.
1