Comments by "No Fate But What We Make" (@SonoftheAllfather) on "Gabbard reacts to being attacked by CNN, New York Times" video.

She's being attacked because Zio-globalists like Zucker and his tribal buddies have a vested interest in keeping us involved in wars that destabilize nations in the neighborhood of Israel.
2
@ezswan Zucker is a Zionist through and through.
2
@ezswan He was an AIPAC spokesman, FFS.
2
@ezswan So because the Rothschilds are like the arch-Zionists and the literal financiers of the ]ewish state, Zucker is not a Zionist warmonger as well? Sound reasoning there, guy. CNN is pushing warmongering propaganda as we speak. Zucker is complicit. Why are you defending him and trying to trivialize his Zionistic loyalties?
2
@ezswan Nit-picking? No, you are denying his influence for no apparent reason...perhaps because you didn't even know he is a Zionist. Either way, the fact that other Zionists may have more influence is irrelevant to the point, which is that Zucker IS an influential Zionist who supports wars for Israel and he's also the CEO of one of the largest legacy media networks in the nation and world. As you may have seen recently, Project Veritas exposed several CNN media coordinators complaining about how Zucker micromanages the content aired on CNN. He has near-unilateral control and drives propaganda which has a major influence on public opinion regarding foreign conflicts. But he isn't a "big player" according to you? I beg to differ. CNN is currently pushing pro-intervention propaganda about Syria and the Kurds because continued U.S. military presence and regime-change campaigns in the Middle East is good for Israel.
2
@ezswan Is that supposed to be a dissenting argument?
1
@ezswan And btw, the whole point is that Gabbard is being slandered by Zucker's network as a Russian agent because she is taking an anti-intervention (anti-Zionist) stance. Did you even watch the video? The CNN media coordinator himself said: "The one they [CNN/Zucker] don't like is Tulsi...she supports Assad...she's not taking a conventional route when it comes to one policy ...when it comes to that one position, there are a lot of people who are not cool with her." That "one policy" is continued Zionist-influenced war in the Middle East, and those "people" who are "not cool with her" are the Zionist themselves who are entrenched in the governing class.
1
Loraine Jones Tulsi's main redeeming quality is that she's anti-war, but she is a leftist in nearly every other way. She's young and likable, but think about what you're saying. The VP becomes President if Trump dies; he'll be 74 at the start of his second term if he wins (and he will). She might pull us out of wars for Israel, but she will also: >enact fiscally insane Medicare for All, including illegal immigrants. >let people with mental disorders serve in the military. >support DACA, and remove nation quotas for legal immigration, which will bring more foreign competition and leftist votes into the country. >Give Puerto Rico statehood (and 2 more Dem Senators) >liberalize the criminal justice system and release criminals into society.
1
@robertcullen7042 Many times politicians change their tune from primaries to presidential. They go more extreme during the primaries to get the partisan votes and then go more center to get independent votes during the general. That said, Tulsi being the voice of reason during the Democratic primaries says a lot. But it's still hard to say what she actually believes. I'll never vote for a Democrat unless their only viable opponent is an extremely vile neocon.
1