Comments by "No Fate But What We Make" (@SonoftheAllfather) on "JRE Clips" channel.

  1. It also gears men towards discipline and productivity. It increases T levels and athletic endurance. Moreover, it helps young men maintain a more realistic perception of normal sexual relations and behavior. The instant gratification and normalized dehumanization in modern porn leads to measurable social ineptitude and bizarre sexuality. Also, it is a way of boycotting an industry that promotes all kinds of degenerate behavior and exploits young women, often ruining their chances of ever living a normal life.
    464
  2. Horrendous Spanish. He can barely communicate, I would wager.
    97
  3. It's rare to see a lefty who even understands the difference between equity and equality, but it's even more rare to see one who admits they do instead of lying and conflating them as a form of chicanery.
    65
  4. itshiho That's very nihilistic and selfish and that mentality is everything that's wrong with this society. Life isn't just about moving from one feel good experience to the next. It's about deferring your gratification sometimes and saving it for your posterity. If you want to be a degenerate, go ahead. But don't promote that behavior. Some of us actually have a purpose beyond pleasuring ourselves.
    60
  5. He's so full of shit. Postmodernists always try to twist things into a stew of incomprehensible nonsense to try to divert critics. But basically what he argued is that acknowledging a person's biology is the same as making a deterministic conclusion about that person's ability or potential based on their biology. The two are not the same. So by pretending that gender doesn't exist and is a social construct, it liberates people from what is societally or culturally expected of them based on their biology. But here's the thing. That doesn't mean that gender is actually a social construct. It means that he believes that mainstreaming that lie is worth it because it promotes what he considers positive social change. This is the whole point of postmodernism and why it is so despised. Postmodernists have admitted as much that social change is more important than the truth.
    57
  6. Also I guess the little midget is supposed to represent a Black person or something. Black people are not disabled FFS. Equity implies that they need additional help just to succeed. It's actually kind of racist. Soft bigotry of low expectations.
    40
  7.  @josephmeeks5657  She is probably partially indigenous, but being indigenous is not something into which you can just "enroll." Ancestry is a biological reality, which is why her whole take on genetics being irrelevant to tribal membership is ridiculous. The push to trivialize or deny the ancestral/ethnic criteria for indigeneity or membership of an ethnic group will eventually be the thing that makes indigenous and ethnic identity rootless and undefinable. Her position (that genetics are irrelevant to tribal membership) is probably a neurotic defense mechanism that is rooted in her discomfort with having her indigenous identity questioned or trivialized because she is half European. Your position is rooted in a false and unpragmatic sense of moral virtue.
    31
  8. @Doug Lucas: It isn't so much the frequency, but the instant gratification and exposure to unrealistic sexuality i.e. porn is not an accurate representation of normal sex. It also increases young men's tendency to subconsciously objectify girls. Guys that are old enough remember times before internet porn. It was not the same. If you're old enough to remember those times, you can't deny it.
    30
  9.  @mac_mcleod  No one turns people away for being women or being nonwhite, you cvck. They hire women and nonwhites even if they aren't as qualified or talented as their male and/or white peers. That is the whole point you fool.
    27
  10.  @jonm7888  Not in terms of economics. Equity means a doctor makes the same wage as the guy working a night shift at Jack in the Crack. You call that fairness? I call it authoritarianism and communism.
    25
  11. The Source and the Eschaton I don't worship anything. I don't moralize either, I simply denounce people who try to spread toxic viewpoints and behaviors. Think of it this way: someone who promotes something toxic and unhealthy like porn (or denies that it is toxic and unhealthy) is like a person who willfully promotes people smoking cigarettes or denies that cigarettes are unhealthy. Impulsive and detrimental habits should not be promoted. I don't really care if people want to ruin their own lives, but I don't tolerate people that try to drag others down with them. Does that make sense?
    22
  12. They do. It's called diversity hires. Welcome to 2020, where feelings matter more than reality.
    20
  13. Leftists deliberately overlook sociocultural trends as a possible reason for why there are more of these events occurring. This is because leftism is the prevalent sociocultural trend, so they refuse that their own ideology causes more mental illness. Their denial is causing a lot of death and pain.
    19
  14. Nobody seemed to give a fuck when Obama's administration was doing the same thing.
    15
  15. Just goes to show that "tolerance," much like "diversity" or "inclusivity" is not always an inherently good thing, even though that's the narrative the Left always peddles. Tolerance (in most contexts that its used in political discourse) just means moral and cultural relativism. People often forget that a culture or civilization is defined just as much by what they DON'T tolerate as they are by what they tolerate.
    14
  16. Just goes to show that "tolerance," much like "diversity" or "inclusivity" is not always an inherently good thing, even though that's the narrative the Left always peddles. Tolerance (in most contexts that its used in political discourse) just means moral and cultural relativism. People often forget that a culture or civilization is defined just as much by what they DON'T tolerate as they are by what they tolerate.
    13
  17.  @WhereAmEye2187  Bullshit. He probably speaks broken Spanglish pigeon. Overpronunciation. He tries too hard.
    12
  18.  @mnichols2011  I think the point is that they deny and attempt to subvert biological reality because they think social change is more virtuous and important than truth. They think deception is a valid way to create equal outcomes. But it would all be artificial.
    12
  19. Paleoarcheology and genetics too. lol
    12
  20.  @michaeltravis3562  The name India comes from that Sanskrit word "Sindhu," which is also where "Hindu" comes from through the Persian language. The name Indos was used by the Greeks and Romans used Indus to refer to the general region and the Indus River. It was present in Romance languages and Old English too and was used by Albert the Great. The term "Indies" was derived from Latin and was almost surely the name used by the Latin world during the time of Columbus. It had nothing to do with the Latin word for God. If you're going to go around calling everyone ignorant who uses the term, you might want to get your own facts straight.
    11
  21. "I'm Polish and Choctaw" >Has Irish name. Ok.
    11
  22.  @daveb606  That is not a fact at all. All archeological, genetic, and historical evidence points to Amerindians having an Asian origin.
    11
  23.  @corinnesalazar2720  Haven't you ever thought about where the prefix of the word "indigenous" comes from? Lol
    10
  24. Joe's either totally uninformed/misinformed about that incident, or he's simply a moron. The cops were more than respectful and tried to reason with that guy for over an hour. He was passed out drunk in a drive-thru with his car running. When they confirmed he was DUI and tried to place him under arrest, he attacked them and tried to use a tazer against an officer. They did what they are legally obliged to do in that situation. He was not a victim of brutality. He was a moron who play a stupid game and won a stupid prize.
    10
  25. ​ @jahmeekmorgan3235  Your thinking pattern is obviously nonexistent and even further warped by neo-Marxian grievance theorem. You American Afrocentrics are possibly the most sad and delusional bunch in the entire world. You act apophenic, trying to find patterns between totally unrelated things in a desperately transparent attempt to prove that all of history is a white supremacist conspiracy.
    10
  26. It's funny that nowadays we give praise to liberals for simply accepting reality.
    10
  27. ​ @michaeljorgensen790  My job involves reading people, and I had the same thought just by reading his body language here. You were just able to put it into much more concise language. There seems to be an arrogance in Eric that might be rooted in some kind of feeling of inadequacy and/or envy of greater minds (vulnerable narcissism) or maybe, as you said, he does simply have a gross overestimation of his own abilities that is rooted in basically thinking he knows everything because he doesn't realize there is so much that he doesn't know (Dunning Kruger).
    10
  28.  @bayron45  Singapore is extremely authoritarian and to quell ethnic conflict, they mandated that English be spoken as a universal language. I have been to Singapore when I was in the military, and it's the only place I've ever been that has signs at the airports saying the penalty for drug smuggling is death. And I've been to some horrible countries. We shouldn't have to live in an authoritarian dictatorship just so we can be multicultural/multiethnic. They are arguably not even multicultural, only multiethnic. Multiethnic states can exist, but only if there is a dominant uncompromising monoculture that incoming groups willfully and even joyfully embrace. Multiculturalism doesn't work, and America's dominant ethnocultural majority is under outright hostile attack. Most new immigrants do not want or need to adapt, and more and more people and cultural institutions either do not expect them to adapt or outright discourage them from adapting. The obstacle of having a multiethnic state is that every ethnicity has their own culture that they instinctually desire to preserve. If aspects of that culture are incompatible with the host culture and adaptation is discouraged, it will cause serious problems. In earlier waves of immigration, the expectations were totally uncompromising and there was way more social and economic incentive for migrants to adapt. There was no welfare state. The schools and cultural institutions did not adapt to the migrants, the migrants adapted to them. And those migrants were far more similar (racially, culturally, religiously, etc.) than the newer groups that are immigrating now. Some groups are just way too different, and are even hostile towards the West as a whole. How can we expect those people to be positive additions to our countries given all these circumstances? So our countries are not just failing at integrating migrants, globalists (who hold basically all the power) are deliberately undermining the possibility of immigration even being a potentially positive thing. They are weaponizing it and making it totally destructive for the nation state, and that is the whole point. They don't want nation states to exist. So really, the problem is more complicated, and is due to a series of globalist lies. Globalist/leftist lies will be the undoing of this experiment. Their cultural relativism, their attacks on integration standards, their attacks on traditional culture...all of it is designed to destroy the United States as we know it.
    9
  29.  @UniversoulSMOOV999  Just because it seems common sensical does not mean it is accurate, historically or otherwise. Joe probably didn't argue with him because it is a waste of time to argue with someone so divorced from reality.
    9
  30. @Richard Stylez: You're correct that a period of ~three months of not ejaculating will actually decrease your T-levels. The idea is to have sex, obviously, and the amount that makes men maintain the highest average T level is once every two weeks or so. But there is scientific research to prove short term abstinence increases T-levels. Why don't you research it before you claim there is no science behind it? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11760788 http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/chemistryofattraction/download/Oberzaucher_Poster.pdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alonso_Fernandez-Guasti/publication/6536830_Relationship_between_sexual_satiety_and_brain_androgen_receptors/links/54b6c2970cf2e68eb27f0321.pdf
    9
  31.  @johannpopper1493  ​ The U.S. has explicit values that theoretically should be accepted by all residents, but are not. They are not even universally accepted/shared among native born Americans. Among foreign people, they are usually only reluctantly accepted (if at all), and are constantly being tested and framed as a form of oppression. Inundate the country year after year with millions of people with totally different values, and the system collapses. That's the whole problem with importing culturally incompatible population groups. Cultural relativism is moral relativism. Open borders equals open values. Culture and values are linked, and culture is strongly correlated to ethnicity. Hence, ethnicity is NOT arbitrary at all when it comes to migration. It is only in the West that we pretend it doesn't matter for fear of social repercussions. Also, the idea of "reasonable" tolerance is subjective. My version is likely far different than yours.
    8
  32.  @WhereAmEye2187  Habla Español amigo?
    8
  33. The VA will take care of his medical, psych, etc. and he'll get disability for his entire life. It could be more, but it's something at least. :)
    8
  34.  @ts8404  Yes, yes...let's start circling the semantic deconstruction drain and arguing about the definition of crazy.
    7
  35.  @Bean-vj1lf  "Don't speak when you have nothing smart to say." Doesn't that mean you should basically STFU for all eternity?
    7
  36.  @ChillyChav  Yeah I think it's the other way around. I believe the traditional narrative which is based upon mountains of archeological and historical and genetic evidence. You believe a narrative which is not supported by the vast majority of research, and yet you say my understanding is based on propaganda. Sounds like projection to me.
    7
  37. ​ @jahmeekmorgan3235  Because there is archeological evidence that the Norse reached North America, as well as historical text affirming it. There is also mountains of archeological evidence and historical documentation detailing the voyages made by the European powers. There is also genetic tests of both modern humans and ancient skeletons that confirm there was no sub-Saharan African influx into the Americas (pre-Euro colonial period). There is also the issue that advanced seafaring technology had not been developed and implemented in pre-Euro colonial sub-Saharan Africa, perhaps because they didn't feel a great need for it. Most of the seafaring technology they had came from the Arabs, and they were not particularly good seafarers either. I don't think people ignore the possibility, but all logic and evidence points to the contrary. And the Natives are not thought to be light-skinned, but brown skinned, similar to indigenous Amerindians who still exist today. Dark skinned or even black skinned does not mean Sub-Saharan African in origin. There is some genetic evidence that Polynesians reached South America, but it was a very small influx. They are also great seafarers and explorers because they are an oceanic people. So it makes sense.
    7
  38. ​ @allahuackbar396  Aqueducts were not a Roman invention. Aqueducts were arguably perfected by the Romans though, which is evidenced by how successful and extensive their aqueduct system was. The Assyrians, Egyptians, Greeks, Harrapans etc. all built aqueducts, some before Rome was even founded as a city.
    7
  39.  @jonm7888  I didn't "get the definition" anywhere. Like I said it's fairly common economic knowledge and self-descriptive, so FFS, why don't you go confirm. Prove me wrong. Do you even internet, bro?
    7
  40.  @E0572-e1n  To an Afrocentric halfwit, a simple picture of people who appear Black are definitively Black.
    7
  41.  @j.psimon3056  It doesn't matter if he's white, his views are still totally fringe and are purely speculative. As I've said already, the vast majority of archeological, historical, and scientific evidence point to Amerindians having an Asian origin and Sub-Saharan Africans never traversing the Atlantic to the American continents.
    7
  42.  @Bean-vj1lf  Stop plaguing humanity with your existence.
    6
  43.  @joshuawright9852  You can't require a license for a right that is deemed unalienable by our Constitution. That's like having a license to speak.
    6
  44.  @jahmeekmorgan3235  Your knowledge runs deep, or your indoctrination into pseudohistorical Afrocentric dogma?
    6
  45.  @allahuackbar396  "the aqueduct was a Roman invention" -You one month ago. Are you really going to lie about this? The comment is right there for everyone to see.
    6
  46.  @allahuackbar396  ​ False. If you want evidence of a Roman-style elevated aqueduct that was built before Rome was even founded as a city, look at the ruins of the aqueduct of Nineveh, the ancient capital of Assyria. Ironically, much of the site was destroyed by Islamic fundamentalists in 2014 as an act of iconoclasm. Allahu Akbar, eh?
    6
  47.  @Kyle-hq2rm  Right. All those cunts that push that shit just happen to be socialists.
    6
  48.  @fearless798  Name the scientific evidence that proves Sub-Saharan Blacks traversed the Atlantic and populated the Americas. There is none. Most point to the Luzia Woman, but genetic tests proved she was not African. That "other researcher" was probably the quack Graham Hancock, who is also a well-discredited pseudo-theorist.
    6
  49.  @Dremac5  That Black Africans reached the Americas and are the real Native Americans. There would surly be some genetic legacy or paleoarcheological finding, but there is none.
    6
  50. Joe's either totally uninformed/misinformed about that incident, or he's simply a moron. The cops were more than respectful and tried to reason with that guy for over an hour. He was passed out drunk in a drive-thru with his car running. When they confirmed he was DUI and tried to place him under arrest, he attacked them and tried to use a tazer against an officer. They did what they are legally obliged to do in that situation. He was not a victim of brutality. He was a moron who play a stupid game and won a stupid prize.
    5
  51.  @ChillyChav  Indians also had oral histories of white gods, etc. It's baseless.
    5
  52.  @ChillyChav  I'm talking about Native Americans. Pull start, not push start. :) I don't need to appropriate the cultures and achievements of nonwhite groups just to feel better about myself. Propaganda is bullshit designed to exploit emotions. My positions are based on scientific fact. Archeology, history, and genetics. Yours are based on what exactly?
    5
  53.  @ChillyChav  I don't have to mention anything about those three topics. 99.9% of all research within those three disciplines backs my position and debunks your Afrocentric idiocy.
    5
  54.  @jakefromstatefarm142  What is there to explain? The current lexicon, the current mainstream culture, the current zeitgeist is thoroughly dominated by liberalism and leftism. And more people are mentally ill now than ever before. I'm pointing to that correlation and how liberals and leftists defend against the notion that their ideological dominance is to blame for the increase in mental illness, especially among young men.
    5
  55.  @ystconnection  Lol
    5
  56.  @jonm3131  Wasn't the Revolutionary War largely funded by foreign loans? I mean, taxes were assessed and used to pay them off, but...
    5
  57.  @jonm7888  INCOME... EQUALITY. That means equal incomes.
    5
  58.  @HiroshimaXl  That definition is chicanery. Pay equity is equal pay regardless of input or output. The people making 17 an hour are actually getting paid the value of their labor. Your union elevates your wages past the value of your labor because they hold a monopoly on the labor pool. That is all good and well for you, but that is not pay equity, by your definition or mine.
    5
  59.  @HiroshimaXl  I said the definition you used is chicanery. I didn't say equity means chicanery. Wtf are you talking about? Marxists are constantly trying to obfuscate and manipulate the definitions of things to suit their narrative and agenda. Pay equity means equal pay. It doesn't mean "fair" which is a completely subjective moral thing and also suggests that equal pay is fair no matter what the input or output. I use Forsyth's distributive norms. I'm so beyond tired of taking part in semantic arguments advanced by deceptive ideologues.
    5
  60. No, people with absolutely no steadfast and consistent conviction are what is wrong with America. I saw a video recently of a guy interviewing people at the beach in LA, asking them questions like whether or not it should be illegal for brothers and sisters to get married. The amount of weak, invertebrate people who were scared to take a stand (presumptively because they feared the social stigma of appearing "intolerant") was absolutely disgusting and depressing.
    5
  61. ​ @godniiji  You'd rather have a fake doctorate from a supremacist fringe religious group than one from an accredited university? You act as if this person is on a major platform because of the veracity of his claims, when in reality the reason is because the general masses (especially those that are attracted to this guy's worldview) are grossly ignorant and believe what they want to believe, not what is reality. I hold a PhD in America, and I am a professor of ancient history. Guess that shoots your whole "manager at Subway" narrative straight out of the water.
    5
  62. Carl, I think it's ironic that you originally got banned for pointing out the blatant cultural Marxist double standards levied against Whites (which identitarians point out constantly) and then subsequently got banned for subjecting an identitarian to degenerate interracial gay porn because you were embarrassed you couldn't win an argument against him. Spencer is not even nearly the best our movement has to offer. You know you can't win against our arguments because deep down, you know we're right. Your cognitive dissonance was on clear display when your worldview was proven flawed; you threw a tantrum like a infantile Leftist instead of reevaluating your position.
    4
  63.  @ChillyChav  He is a Ivan Van Sertima disciple. IVS thought that the Olmec were Black African. This pseudo-history is ridiculous.
    4
  64.  @ChillyChav  People make blanket statements about White people (Europeans) all the time and nobody bats an eye. I believe evidence in context. I don't believe it when people take selected bits of evidence out of overall context and use them to create some implausible narrative. If there was overwhelming and consistent evidence that Black Africans reached the Americas and contributed to the bioculture there, I would willingly believe it. But there isn't.
    4
  65.  @richarddavis5289  Bullshit. Hebrew isn't an Indo-European language. Celtic is. The two languages aren't even in the same language family. It is your responsibility to defend your assertions.
    4
  66. They try to act all pensive and self-reflective as though their "mistakes" were not entirely deliberate and they actually have "work to do" to fix it. They aren't going to fix anything. They are leftists in power. They will lie and censor and crush their opposition. They don't care.
    4
  67.  @williamriggs1972  It isn't a leap of faith, you're being willfully ignorant. Their algorithm enforces leftist political correctness and is designed to target wrongthink. You know it; they know it. You're just too dishonest to admit it.
    4
  68.  @joshuawright9852  Licensing would only marginally prevent irresponsible behavior. If licensing was totally effective, there would be no irresponsible drivers, and we both know there are plenty of people who should have that privilege revoked. But that's the thing, we can revoke that privilege, because it's a privilege, not an unalienable right guaranteed by the Constitution. Any legislation which effects a citizen's right to keep and bear arms is technically unconstitutional, so we must be very, very careful about continuing to layer on legislation. Most gun legislation simply doesn't work, so eventually, the gun grabbers will go after the 2A itself because all their legislation will fail to deliver the outcomes they want. That is why I don't support any legislation. It sets the precedent for them to take away a right our Founders considered a right that government couldn't take away...a right given to us by our Creator...if you believe in that sort of thing.
    4
  69. Richard Parker You do realize the KKK was made up almost exclusively of Southern Democrats?
    4
  70.  @andreathesexy1  Most Afro-Americans are at least partially mixed with European, especially if they aren't recent immigrants. While I agree that at some point of mixing, categorizing seems arbitrary and subjective, I still think that genetics should be the defining criteria for indigeneity and ethnicity. My reasoning is this: if there isn't something unalterable (like genetics) that defines these things, then those categorizations/identities will become subjective, because anyone will be able to claim them at a whim. Something that's for everyone is for no one. Or in other words, extreme inclusivity leads to the destruction of human bio and cultural diversity. It's ironic, but these ethnic divisions are all that really maintains our biodiversity. The Latin prefix "div" actually means SEPARATE. As things currently are, it creates a difficult situation when a person is mixed. Even if there isn't a one drop principle in a culture, they feel rootless, because they now they're not quite one thing and not quite the other. Everyone feels a need to belong...a need for kin, or an extended family. That is essentially what an ethnic group is and always has been. So while it may seem like pure racism to divide by using strict biological criteria to define identity, it really is what maintains biodiversity. Personally, I purposefully chose to have children with someone very similar to me ethnically. Not because I hate other groups of people or think I'm superior or pure or some BS like that, but because I didn't want my children to feel rootless and confused about their identity. It's hard enough being diaspora Europeans or Africans, because nothing biological defines our national identity. If we have no ethnic identity either, it creates even more feelings of rootlessness. People long for an identity that makes them unique and can't be taken from them. Why do you think ancestry tests are so popular in countries like the U.S.? It's because we are rootless. Our nationality is defined by marginally shared ideas, not something biological and unalterable.
    4
  71.  @andreathesexy1  Actually, that is false. A nation can be defined by descent, and therefore by ethnicity or race, and it often is. There are many examples of this throughout history and the present. You are stuck in an American mindset which dictates that a nation is just citizenship or a piece of land. A nation is, by its very definition, a group of PEOPLE. Those people are often defined by descent i.e. genetics. It's impossible to be succinct with a topic this. If you want shallow, thoughtless dialogue, you're talking about the wrong topic, and definitely to the wrong person.
    4
  72.  @andreathesexy1  A nation is a group of people, not a land mass. Look up the definition. It is often used interchangeably with country, but a country is really just a land mass which constitutes a state with borders. A nation and a country are separate things. That is why indigenous tribes are called nations even though they reside within the country of the United States. And yes, nations can be defined by ethnicity, and ethnicity has a genetic criteria. It's not really that difficult to understand. You just have to accept that you've been conditioned to understand nationhood in the American way, which defines its citizenship based on things other than ethnicity.
    4
  73.  @jaxn13  I'm not familiar with you friendo. But yes, I'm not producing much anymore. I always have tons of ideas, but the production takes so much of my time. 3 kids, wife, new home, and a full time job makes production near impossible. I want to create more though. I still probably will. But what I really want to do is debate people and bring my message to a wider, more ideologically diverse audience.
    4
  74.  @danielosuna4980  Because people that are the most mentally anguished and disgruntled by mainstream culture tend to be on the dissident right.
    4
  75. ​ Have Issues  You're correct about the history of aqueduct technology, but why debase yourself and your commentary by acting in such a crude and abusive manner? Ignorance can be frustrating, but sickening?
    4
  76.  @allahuackbar396  What you said is false. You said Romans invented aqueducts.
    4
  77.  @Kyle-hq2rm  Bro, tell me the difference between Marxism and socialism. Are you talking about populist/NatSoc type "socialism?" Marx surely wasn't a cunt like the cultural Marxists/postmodernists but his teachings spawned all kinds of evil shit.
    4
  78.  @Kyle-hq2rm  You think I don't know who Chomsky is dude? Come on. Lol. Know thy enemy.
    4
  79.  @HiroshimaXl  What you just described is what occurs in a capitalist system. The market sets the value of various forms of labor and contribution. Manipulating that and dictating what is "fair" is idiotic and subjective, but irrelevant to this argument about the semantics of equity. Equity only means fairness in certain contexts, and because things being equal is by default generally considered fair. But in economics, equity is equal pay no matter what the input/output, which is the opposite of fair.
    4
  80.  @tdurhamm  There is no scientific evidence for what this guy is suggesting. Lol
    4
  81.  @aleckleiner  I guess colonization was just reclaiming our ancestral homeland then. Lol
    3
  82. The Yucatan is the shit.
    3
  83. Whenever I hear it, I think about the fact that it makes no sense. "Radical" is the opposite of fundamental. Saying the type of Islam practiced by Salafists is "radical" insulates the barbaric foundational tenets of Islam from being exposed and criticized for what it is. So-called "Islamists" are following a fundamental, literalist interpretation of their holy scriptures. The real radicals are the ones trying to reform Islam so it's no longer a 7th century death cult, and they get a fatwa for their troubles.
    3
  84.  lelennyfox34  The fuck am I "on about?" Clearly, you are a Brit or perhaps an Australian. So let me explain some things to you, since you clearly don't know wtf you're talking about. There is no such thing as a "Mexican accent." There are multiple accents in Mexico, just like in England or any other country. His Aussie accent comes through horribly in his Spanish and his vocabulary and phonetics sounds like he learned from an illiterate naco from Sonora.
    3
  85.  @WilsonNeverStopSwimming  Your command of Spanish is likely worse than your command of English, which is poor. Your grammar is as pathetic as your rhetoric. The phrase "believe you me" copies the archaic word order one finds in Early Modern English for a marked imperative. It is a commonly used alternative to "believe me." You are out of your league, kid. Go to bed.
    3
  86.  @WilsonNeverStopSwimming  Bullshit. Your logic doesn't hold. Me being "native" is irrelevant. He is not native either. I can detect proper Spanish pronunciation, just as non-English speakers can detect proper English pronunciation. His "Spanish" accent sounded nothing like Castilian and what he said was vulgar, "oye coño tio" is like saying "hey pussy dude" essentially. Am I wrong? They what he said in "Mexican Spanish" also sounded like illiterate slang with a piss poor accent. "Oye güey, que paso güey.." Really? This guy spent 18 years in Mexico and that's the best demonstration he can execute?
    3
  87.  @Syphonfllter  The irony of your projection-riddled diatribe is that is made you appear equally as sanctimonious as you claim me to be...if not more. Moreover, it made you look petty and deluded. "Lingo" being part of common parlance is irrelevant. He poorly demonstrated the local vernacular by using vulgar slang. You call me a narcissist - here's a little-known fact about NPD: it revolves around envy - both envying others and wanting others to envy you. That said, I do not envy those who are poorly educated, nor do I wish for them to envy me. If you paid attention, you may have noticed the only point at which I revealed my experience was when I was being accused of having none by simple virtue of the fact that I'm a non-native speaker. But thanks for alluding to the "pedestal I aptly built for myself," even if it was intended as a slight. In a way, that only means that you agree with the fact that I successfully defended my assertion, which was simply that this guy's command of Spanish is poor. It was not about me being a "linguistics fucking phenom" or this journo's "experience in Mexico." By the way, I actually did watch this entire video before commenting on this thread, but thanks for the "suggestion" which was in actuality you commanding me to do something in a deranged and hubristic manner.
    3
  88.  @Syphonfllter  Well if no one needs by input, then surely no one needs your inane gibberings either. You're the one attacking me personally, drawing conclusions, and making judgments without solid reasoning. I, on the other hand, have stayed on topic instead of counterattacking you with ad hominens. The point is that this guy is unskilled and has a poor command of Spanish. There were people on here defending his abilities; I refuted them. Slang "mattering in vernacular" is irrelevant. No skilled individual would demonstrate the differences between Spanish and Mexican phonetics by using slang. End of story.
    3
  89.  @Syphonfllter  Yes yes. I'm delusional and yet golden simultaneously. But I'm the one who is delusional and condescending. Hahaha! I never said there aren't different dialects based on region; I said this guy is terrible at representing those differences in speech. You're embarrassing yourself!
    3
  90.  @Syphonfllter  He's a representative of retard virtue signaling inept shit-tier journos everywhere; especially those who can't speak Spanish to save their lives. I never took your dumbass commentary seriously, believe you me.
    3
  91. bangmeister2012 Mexicans had African slaves too. In fact, millions more slaves went to Latin America in comparison to North America. At the height of slavery in America (1860), only 8% of American households owned all 4 million slaves. More White Americans descend from ancestors that were indentured servants than descend from ancestors that owned slaves. So why exactly is America better than Mexico? It surely wasn't because of slavery.
    3
  92.  @Obi-WanJabr0ni  Lol I was a police officer for 12 years. It's evident that you don't know the first thing about policing, and I hope you never become a police officer. You're far too dishonest and irrational. An anti-police police officer? lol that's not a complete contradiction or anything. Bottom line is that Brooks was not treated poorly or unprofessionally by the APD. To say he was is a brazen lie. He was passed out drunk in a Wendy's drive-thru and APD officers were extremely patient and professional with him. Most officers wouldn't even have been as nice as they were, so the idea that if different officers were in their place, the result would be different is also a lie. APD had more than enough probable cause to arrest Brooks, and they went through normal, completely reasonable procedures to arrest him. He didn't just resist arrest, he physically attacked a police officer, disarmed that officer of a weapon considered lethal in the state of Georgia, and fired that weapon at a police officer. THAT is why he was shot and killed. It wasn't the officer's fault. His death was completely the result of his own illegal and violent actions. And I didn't misquote you at all. You made an idiotic comment and then attempted to unsuccessfully backpeddle and gaslight me like a psychopath. What Joe said and what you said only shows how acutely divorced from reality both of you are when it comes to law enforcement. All you armchair operators from the comfortable position of hindsight think you could avoid every one of these situations and do everything better, but you couldn't be more wrong. You are devoid of any credible frame of reference and have no experience whatsoever. Your opinion is completely unrealistic and therefore, invalid. And yet you still run your mouth. It's pathetic.
    3
  93.  @philipafuto2030  Not your bro and I'll never be silenced. What is the skull supposed to mean? Death threat?
    3
  94. ​ @richarddavis5289  The Celtic language is not the most similar language to Hebrew. Proto-Celtic is directly descended from Proto-Indo-European. Hebrew is not descended from Proto-Indo-European. Hebrew is a Northwest Semitic language that descends from proto-Semitic and proto-Afroasiatic. The closest language to Hebrew would probably be the extinct language Ugaritic.
    3
  95.  @richarddavis5289  Irish, Scottish Gaelic, Welsh, Manx, Cornish, Breton...all Celtic languages descended from Indo-European. You don't know what you're talking about. Ancient Hebrew isn't even an Indo- European language...it's Afro-Asiatic.
    3
  96.  @JETHO321  They were a Caucasian Mediterranean type people. Semitic types, like the Akkadians, Sumerians, Arabs, Israelites, Phoenicians, Carthaginians, etc. It's pretty obvious by their hieroglyphs. But there were some Nubians among them too.
    3
  97.  @alwayslernin4400  I cringe when I hear people pretend they know how to correctly do the job of the police. Leftists and their controlled propaganda apparatuses have manufactured the false narrative that the police have a systemic problem with incompetence and/or racism. In reality, it's all just blame-shifting for political purposes. The Left blames the police when it's citizens who are largely to blame. The Left always wants to reform the system and restrict the rights and abilities of decent and law-abiding police and citizens just because one segment of society cannot behave themselves under the current system. And because a disproportionate amount of that segment is not white, the Left pretends the system is to blame and in need of reform, instead of the scumbags who are directly responsible for causing the vast majority of societal problems. I'm sick of the Left blaming everyone and everything EXCEPT the individuals who are directly responsible just so they can maintain their bullshit political narratives.
    3
  98.  @williamriggs1972  A libertarian that defends monopolistic leftist tech firms who engage in the censoring of free speech? I've had about enough of your lies, Billy Boy.
    3
  99.  @stephenlouwbiokineticist4127  Yes, a fact which I stated to this clown-tier leftist shill more than once.
    3
  100.  @joshuawright9852  But you actually do need a permit in most places to carry. If you knew anything about guns, you'd already know that.
    3
  101.  @donnellyadam14  It's a meme you fucking clown.
    3
  102.  @remy.dreals8518  Tunisia is named after the ancient city of Tunis, which is named either for the Berber word for "encampment" or possibly for the Phoenician (Canaanite) goddess Tanit. Either way, it's name probably has pre-Roman roots. Tunis was probably called Tunis, or something very similar, when Hannibal was born in Carthage. Your anti-white racism is clouding your ability to think objectively, which is the only way to properly assess history and draw anything meaningful and valid from it.
    3
  103.  @andreathesexy1  I'm familiar with the ethnohistory of Sicilians. I agree that many ethnicities contributed to the Sicilian ethnogenesis. But what do you mean by "US Black purity testing" and what does that have to do with Sicilian ethnohistory?
    3
  104.  Have Issues  Educated people can be incorrect and idiotic too, hence the phrase "educated idiot." People make false claims all the time. Some are misinformed, some are uninformed, some are deceptive. Whatever the case, they carry the burden of proof to substantiate their claim with facts. Water off a duck's back. Try to relax. You'll live longer.
    3
  105. These people just need to own their leftist bias. They are insulting everyone's intelligence masquerading as anything close to a fair arbiter of their platform.
    3
  106.  @jonm7888  Pretty common definition for the distributive norm of equity i.e. income equality. It's kind of self describing... Income....Equality... Maybe do a little research.
    3
  107.  @HiroshimaXl  Holy fuck dude, you're incapable of admitting fault and idiotic to boot. I said "that definition is chicanery," as in the definition itself is a form of chicanery, just like the contrived sociological definition of racism is.
    3
  108.  @HiroshimaXl  The definition changes with context you low-IQ primate. Applied to income, it doesn't simply mean "fairness." Wtf does fairness even mean anyways? "Fairness" isn't quantifiable; it's completely subjective. Equity comes from Latin aequitas which means EQUAL i.e. identical or uniform. So wtf does equity mean when applied to income? It means equal you stupid fuck, no matter what the contribution or output.
    3
  109.  @leonslovo2932  Give instead of take, eh? I wouldn't say that your people have a reputation for being generous. In fact, the stereotype is the opposite, and stereotypes are based upon observed patterns.
    3
  110. Hate speech is free speech.
    3
  111.  @BigShepp1432  People who aren't drunk but kill people in vehicular accidents get charged and sent to prison all the time. Apparently you've never heard of vehicular manslaughter. My cousin went to prison for 6 years because he ran a red light and struck a vehicle and killed a young girl.
    2
  112.  @Holymakinaw  Lol yes he was. He was in his car with the ignition on passed out drunk in a Wendy's drive-thru. He was driving by the legal definition and it doesn't take much of a logical leap to deduce how he arrived at that drive-thru, in his car, with the engine running, drunk. You're either totally uninformed and talking BS or you're a liar. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you're just uninformed.
    2
  113.  @squarerootof2  The guy worked at Evergreen, ffs. He's a social Marxist through and through. You don't work at a place like that without being an anarcho communist sympathizer.
    2
  114. Cool. I just signed up with Wells Fargo.
    2
  115. ​ @darthvader098  Yes, statism and big government is basically the method they both use, but their ideologies and goals for their country/humanity is what really defines them, and therefore is what truly differentiates them as well. In almost every other way, the far-right and far-left are diametrically opposed, which is why the NSDAP emerged as a response to communist uprisings. The Nazis were only anti-capitalist because they viewed capitalism to be an inherently "Semitic" system (designed by those people for the benefit of those people). But they were also heavy industrialists and believed in hierarchical systems and social Darwinism. That is why much of their economic output was only de facto controlled by the state. Some people on the right try to define any ideology that uses statism/authoritarianism as leftism. But that notion is ridiculous when you think about it critically for more than a few seconds. If we define all statism as leftism, we would need to define monarchies and empires of the past as leftist, which is laughable. I guess the point is that statism and big government is not inherently leftist. What makes it leftist or not is what they do with that statism. Your BJP may use big government methods, but they are nationalists who want to preserve traditional Indian identities and culture. That is makes really makes them right wing and these reasons are why I view the horseshoe theory as a largely false and unnuanced way of looking at right/left politics.
    2
  116. He doesn't know wtf he is talking about with politics. Honestly, I don't know why he even discusses these things. He should stick to other issues.
    2
  117. How can justice be administered when those responsible for administering it are in league with the criminals? What is happening in places like Portland and Berkeley is happening because their city leadership are communists and Antifa are their useful idiot foot soldiers.
    2
  118. Must be a hard job, being a defense lawyer for a company that is so obviously guilty.
    2
  119. Sam IQ is partially genetic/hereditary and wealth is positively correlated with IQ. Gee, that was easy. I wonder why all those Leftist professors didn't think about that? Oh wait, no...they have thought about it, they just lie and deny facts because they're ideolouges.
    2
  120. Gods above, the absolute LUNATICS that this guest and his lies attracted to JRE is a disgrace.
    2
  121. ​ @samrowbotham8914  You're just playing a deceptive sematic word game. There are criminal statues that make DUI illegal in every U.S. state. Laws are generally enacted through the process of indirect consent i.e. dually elected legislatures create and codify almost all laws. If everyone tried to invalidate and weasel their way out of following laws because they viewed them only as "rules" which require personal consent to be valid, society would collapse within months. Imagine telling a judge that laws preventing homicide are not laws, but "rules," and since you doesn't "consent" to those rules, they are invalid and murdering someone isn't a crime. Lol
    2
  122.  @Obi-WanJabr0ni  He didn't die because they "treat them like murderers" you halfwit. He died because he resisted arrest, disarming a police officer, and attempted to use the weapon on that officer. People like you are pure projectionists. Calling everyone else dumb but have the dumbest takes on any given subject.
    2
  123. ​ @TG-ub7mk  Ahh now all the racial language comes out of you and we see what you're really all about. The man who the APD shot was named Rayshard Brooks, not "Deandre" which proves you don't even know what you're talking about. First you implied they killed him because he was DUI. Now that you got called out on your deception, you're trying to excuse his violent actions and claiming that I'm the one making excuses? Hahaha Legally, what Brooks did was no different than if he had disarmed the officer of his firearm and fired it at him. Whether he was accurate or not or whether or not he was fleeing is legally completely irrelevant. He was a danger to public safety and assaulted a police officer with a deadly weapon. That is why he is dead. And that cop is not going to prison. In fact, he was reinstated as a police officer recently with back pay because it was determined that the APD prematurely fired him and deprived him of his 5th amendment rights. He was totally within his right to use deadly force in that situation. The DA that charged him with all those crimes is totally corrupt. He's no longer the DA and is being criminally investigated for embezzlement and issuing illegal subpoenas in this case. The current DA did an investigation into the case and found that her predecessor‘s decision to prosecute the officers involved may have been politically motivated and involved violations of the rules of ethics lawyers are required to follow by the Georgia Bar Association. She doesn't even want to go to trial in the case and is trying to recuse herself. But Rayshard dindu nuffin because he was black and so are you. What a pathetic person you are "black boy."
    2
  124. ​ @TG-ub7mk  I'm not a national socialist or an ethnic supremacist, but nice try. Also, I don't see your full name or any picture of you on your profile. Why is that? You think you're entitled to anonymity but I'm not? "Even cops say so." lol such a moronic statement. Each cop is an individual entitled to their own opinion, but any cop who knows the law would concede that this was not an illegal use of force. That will become exceedingly clear when the DA either recuses herself or drops the charges against Officer Rolfe, who has already been reinstated with backpay, as I said. Of course, you don't even know the guy's name or the details of the case. All you know is that he was black and the cop is white. Therefore he is innocent, the cop is an evil murderer, and anyone who thinks different is also evil. lol people like you are programmed and are the real supremacists in this country.
    2
  125.  @elvisiwot5215  He wasn't murdered you deceptive fool. The use of deadly force against him was completely justified.
    2
  126.  @williamriggs1972  Horseshit, dude. I hope you're not that gullible. These tech firms are many things, but incompetent or naive are not included. They know exactly what they're doing. They're partisans in an information and cultural war. It isn't that much of a conspiratorial notion or a logical leap. In fact, based on the overwhelming evidence plus their own admission of fault and left-wing bias, the simplest solution is that they are willfully committing these acts of ideological censorship and simply playing defense when someone like Pool checkmates them on their chicanery.
    2
  127.  @williamriggs1972  Gaslighting me will not be effective. At this point, if you defend the behavior of these corrupt tech firms and give them the benefit of the doubt, it can only be assumed that you are ideologically aligned with them and share in their censorious deceptive traits.
    2
  128.  @williamriggs1972  More gaslighting and moreover, a strawman. I never said you were an accessory in their actions. I said you, like them, are a deceptive and censorious leftist scumbag. If I said you were a paid shill working for them, I would be spouting conspiratorial quackery.
    2
  129.  @williamriggs1972  It is absolutely gaslighting. Typical bullshit accusing anyone with a dissent opinion of being a conspiracy theorist. That is the fucking definition of gaslighting. And there is nothing unreasonable or conspiratorial about concluding that Twitter has a left wing bias and ban more Rightists. They have admitted their bias and the facts suggest that I'm right, but I'm the conspiracy theorist quack? Typical leftist deceit spewing from your face.
    2
  130.  @joshuawright9852  We agree it might help, but it is not failsafe. I don't believe in any legislation on principle alone, and secondly because most of it doesn't really work. Licensing might help, but it's unconstitutional just like all gun legislation. You don't need an alternation of the 2A to pass unconstitutional gun legislation. It happens all the time. Just look at Virginia. Mass shootings you see on the news aren't really the problem, tbh. Rifles only account for 3% of gun deaths in the country and still the VAST majority of "mass shootings" are committed by urban gangs who live in some of the most heavily gun restricted areas in the country. You've fallen for the media hysteria if you think firearms related homicides or mass shootings will decrease if rifles are banned or more legislation is layered on. Firearms related deaths are lower now than they've been in years, you just know everything that's going on now because of that little device you stare at all day. It gives you the sense that there's more gun crime now, but it's an illusion. There's actually less. Gun legislation doesn't really change anything. The existing laws aren't even being enforced and they don't even work when they are. So what's the point? All it does is punish people who already follow the law. We either have a right to keep and bear or we don't. The problem in my opinion is society, not our rights or lack thereof. Therefore the solution is better education, better law enforcement, better mental health services, and more cultural and social institutions that encourage healthy behaviors and lifestyles.
    2
  131. ​ @seanocd  The entire gun debate hinges on the fact that the 2A is an unalienable right guaranteed by our Constitution. If it weren't, firearms would already be heavily restricted in the U.S (as they are in other developed Western nations). Even though unconstitutional statues are routinely challenged in the courts, yes, I am very concerned with what you referred to as "legislative creep." The reason is because the courts (some courts in particular) are stacked with activist judges who seek to undermine parts of the Constitution based on their own personal moral beliefs. I am not only concerned with statues which infringe on 2A rights, but 1A rights, 4A rights, 5A rights, etc. The only amendment I would be happy to see revised is the 14A, because 1.) it is not an unalienable right and 2.) its clear intention was to naturalize emancipated Black slaves and give equal rights under the law, not give birthright citizenship to anyone who is born on U.S. soil. I think licensing would be marginally effective for basic gun safety. It might prevent accidents, but it almost certainly wouldn't prevent criminality. Most criminals don't undergo background checks and buy weapons and ammo at stores, and they certainly don't register their weapons. They wouldn't obtain licenses either. As it is, the majority of firearms-related homicides occur in urban jurisdictions with the most heavy gun control in the nation. This proves that gun legislation does not work on those who don't abide by the law (imagine that). That said, most gun owners are law abiding citizens, and they would be the ones who are stripped of their rights because left-wing politicians refuse to blame individuals for their actions, and instead blame the nature of our laws and society. Unfortunately, a lot of the reason these same politicians refuse to place the onus on individuals has to do with the race of most of the individuals charged and convicted of firearms-related homicides. About 70% of firearms-related homicides are committed by a demographic that constitutes <7% of the population: Black/Hispanic males age 15-35. The Euro-American majority, which owns about 70% of the firearms in the country, has homicide rates (some of which aren't even firearm-related) of 2.05 per 100,000, which is similar to that of Belgium, a very low-crime country with no right to keep and bear arms. However, there are some infringements on the 2A that are pragmatic (violent felons not being allowed to own firearms, for instance). But in the end, if they aren't even effective, they are not only unconstitutional, they are not pragmatic either. Factor into the equation that many of the laws already on the books are not even methodically enforced. The Sutherland Springs shooter should have failed his background check for being dishonorably discharged from the Air Force. They didn't do the paperwork correctly, he bought a firearm, and he murdered 26 people. So even though they fail to enforce the laws already on the books, they want to just continue layering on legislation in hopes it'll somehow be effective. If the laws already on the books were just enforced methodically, gun violence would decrease. This is what the NRA argues as well. So to me, the ultimate question we must ask ourselves is: will we become a society that makes the majority suffer because of the inequities of a small minority? If we do, this precedent will continue until we become an authoritarian state. Imagine if everyone's free speech was taken away because a small minority say crazy and hateful things. Imagine if everyone's right to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures was taken away because a small minority of people possess contraband. And the list goes on... We must accept that the 2A isn't going anywhere unless a precedent to undermine the Constitution is set. Given that we have the 2A, we also must accept that guns in and of themselves do not kill people. We must focus on the human element for preventative action. But even this won't completely thwart all gun violence. The fact is that a society with the right to keep and bear arms will have higher than average firearms-related homicides, especially among certain groups.
    2
  132.  @seanocd  Cute. But regardless of what they're called, it couldn't be more explicit; the Bill of Rights are unalienable. They are given to us by our Creator, not my the government.
    2
  133.  @unknownx7252  No he didn't. Lol he was probably pandering to you or trolling you irl. All these fools talk about evidence this and evidence that, but can't NAME the actual evidence. Show me an archeological finding, a historical document, a genomic study...ANYTHING to prove what you people think... None of you can. And the "evidence" that is provided is easily debunked with even the slightest bit of research. I think you all just believe what you want to believe, regardless of the evidence. You deceive yourselves into believing a lie because it makes you feel special. It's sad.
    2
  134.  @unknownx7252  Idiocy and lies irritate me. I cannot deny it.
    2
  135.  @Dremac5  Apophenia. Look it up. There are white versions of you who think Europeans originally peopled the Americas because the tools of the Clovis culture resemble those of Solutrean culture. They are just as sad and desperate as you to prove they wuz KANGZ.
    2
  136.  @Dremac5  You are just parroting the lies of Van Sertima. This is what Columbus actually wrote, which Van Sertima the con artist liar deliberately misconstrued: "Their hair is short and coarse, almost like the hairs of a horse’s tail. They wear the hairs brought down to the eyebrows, except a few locks behind, which they wear long and never cut. They paint themselves black, and they are the color of the Canarians, neither black nor white. Some paint themselves white, others red, and others of what color they find. Some paint their faces, others the whole body, some only round the eyes, others only on the nose."
    2
  137.  @unknownx7252  It is a reference to the Norse god Thor, who was the son of Odin, also called the Allfather by ancient Scandinavians. I am ancestrally Norse, and look a bit like depictions of Thor, so it is a bit of narcissistic humor in a way as well.
    2
  138.  @remy.dreals8518  You say "no scholars agree with my definitions," and then say most relate it to one of the definitions I mentioned. I'm confused. Maybe because you're not a human, but a bot. Or maybe because you're just not very bright. Either way, the name likely has pre-Roman/pre-European roots, and the name was something very similar to Tunis when Hannibal was born. So it wasn't just "wypipo" who called it that.
    2
  139. A border is not an "imaginary line in the dirt." Wtf.
    2
  140.  @jaxn13  I appreciate you. I hope everything is good for you. 👍🏻
    2
  141. ​ @cowgf1504  Yeah, and that is why no females have ever been a fvcking SEAL. The government has changed the standards for all kinds of other positions that females used to not be able to hack. Police, firefighting, military, etc. It's a creeping kind of thing, this Marxian idiocy. All they care about it outcome equity. If they don't get females passing BUDS and becoming SEALs, they will socially engineer it so that females will get in. It's the same thing they do with affirmative black-tion. So it isn't out of the realm of possibility that it's just a matter of time before they lower the standards for elite combat positions as well.
    2
  142.  @cowgf1504  Equality of outcome is Marxian.
    2
  143.  @cowgf1504  "distribution based on one's needs" is theoretically not the same as equality of outcome, but when it is implemented in practice, it turns into social engineering and wealth redistribution every time.
    2
  144.  @jakefromstatefarm142  It's to blame because it destroys societal stability. Morality, norms, culture, etc. are undermined by social liberalism. I know exactly what liberalism is. Don't even bother coming at me with some cliche "classical liberal" argument.
    2
  145.  @jakefromstatefarm142  I don't know you're right at all. I think you're a bad faith actor who is personally invested in attempting to defend liberalism/leftism.
    2
  146.  @jakefromstatefarm142  Lol...acting like psychological ailments are the sole result of physical substances, chemicals, etc. is ridiculous. Of course ideology can create mental illnesses and negative socio behavioral outcomes.
    2
  147. Imran Hussain I don't believe you.
    2
  148. GoodAvatar Soros doesn't just bribe the media. He funds NGOs that work directly with criminal human traffickers. He meddles in elections all over the world trying to advance a globalist agenda. The Koch Brothers are not comparable to Soros. Even if they were, it is an irrelevant point to the OP. Soros did collaborate with the Nazis in occupied Hungary. He has admitted it.
    2
  149. GoodAvatar The Koch brothers do not meddle in international elections and fund organizations that facilitate illegal activities. Like I said, they aren't comparable. The Koch Brothers fund some kook like Alex Jones. So what? Soros' Open Society Foundation operates in 37 countries and has been fundamental in the mass invasion of Europe by Middle Eastern and African migrants.
    2
  150.  @MadMaxter01  It was hard for me to pick up on something that subtle given that I was fairly certain that every single thing I was hearing coming out of her mouth was a lie. Utterly deceptive woman. This is a perfect position for her.
    2
  151.  @valthomas9786  My evidence is that there is government/legally sanctioned racial discrimination against white people in both academia and employment in this country. If we are to assume that academic and economic opportunity leads to prosperity and wealth, how can poor Blacks not have an easier road to the middle class than similarly impoverished Whites? Because Blacks still have lesser outcomes, despite these legal advantages? BS. Because of some shadowy "system of advantage" that whites enjoy that can't even be quantified or proven? BS. As I said, you can't have an honest discussion about group outcomes without talking about group differences in behavior, culture, etc. Differences in outcomes are not the exclusive result of discrimination. Besides the obvious phenotypic differences, there are many average differences between different ethnic groups: bone density, skull structure, muscle tissue, hormonal levels, socio-behavorial traits, intelligence levels. You can delude yourself with egalitarian lies all you want, but human groups are different, just as humans individuals are different.
    2
  152.  @valthomas9786  I'm not agitated at all. Just talking. Jim Crow laws don't exist anymore. Only their legacies can be argued to exist. Affirmative action laws do exist as we speak. I can't believe you're not aware of them. They are called things like "positive" discrimination. They slap a "positive" next to their policy of racial discrimination and voila! It's virtuous. :) Name me one American law that is racist in its intent towards Black people. I'll save you the trouble...one doesn't exist. I don't believe in racial superiority, but I believe in science and genetics. Genetics show us that members of certain human ancestral groups, even at birth, are predisposed to have certain traits as they fully develop. Can you seriously sit here and tell me that an African is not more likely to become physically superior to an Asian? Certain things are just blatantly obvious, but people have been conditioned to deny it through a process of egalitarian ideological brainwashing.
    2
  153.  @jonm7888  Economic egalitarianism/income equality/a "distributive justice" framework is the economic endgoal of a communist state. Regardless of their inputs, all group members are given an equal share of the rewards/costs.
    2
  154.  @Chicagocubbiegirl  They believe their God is everyone's true God. So even if it is between them and their God, the idea that they are Chosen is still a belief in their inherently divine superiority over other groups.
    2
  155. ​ @johannpopper1493  I don't think freely isolating or preserving an exclusive nation-state is inherently supremacist. I also don't think it harms the group. Quite the opposite, I think it is the only viable vehicle which can preserve a group and their unique biocultural diversity. The reason most people think the ]evvs are supremacists is only partially due to the jus sanguinus naturalization policies of their ethnoreligious state. It is more to due with their general attitudes towards those outside their tribe, which is said to be a cultural manifestation of supremacist passages in their holy scripture. But I agree with you that what you call "isolationist supremacism" is harmless to others. That said, why are people of European descent called evil when we express a desire or take action to create our own exclusive communities or states? I also agree that universal conquest supremacism is tyrannical, and that's really the most overt form of supremacism.
    2
  156. @John Failphins: B-b-b-but Muslims spewing anti-Semitic hate speech (and facing no repercussions) is just part and parcel of living in a vibrantly diverse and tolerant society. You should try it sometime! Oh wait...nevermind. You would be jailed.
    2
  157. For those who don't know, actors and entertainers were considered equal to slaves and prostitutes in ancient Rome. The Romans' reasoning was that a person who basically lies and "acts" like they're someone else as a profession was duplicitous and not worthy of respect. Some emperors did not even allow actors to have any contact with the upper classes. In a society where honesty, merit, personal accomplishments and pursuit of civic virtue were held in the highest regard, it makes sense. Our people idolize them, the Romans held them in contempt. Shows you where we are as a society.
    2
  158. Joe's good at acting like he's reasonable, but underneath that veneer, he's a clueless LA libtard and it's become totally clear when he opines on topics like law and order.
    1
  159. ​ @678rwhp  People who get arrested for DUI usually don't kill anyone, but it is gross negligence. You can't imprison a cop simply for killing, as killing in and of itself is not illegal. Most of the time, police are well within their legal right to use self defense when they shoot someone. There are three different categories that a bad police shooting can fall under: honest mistake, negligent, or malicious. Judiciaries decide which it will be based on the evidence and totality of the circumstances. Police usually get fired for an honest mistake. They only get prison time if it can be proven that they were grossly negligent or maliciously intended to kill the person. That's pretty hard to prove, which is why police rarely do jail time.
    1
  160.  @Holymakinaw  "Over the limit" is driving while intoxicated. American police generally do impound and tow the vehicle of a drunk driver unless they're feeling nice or it doesn't make any sense to do it. He would have gone to jail in the back of the cop car. Uber wouldn't be needed.
    1
  161. @independentCog Fox is a publisher with no legal immunity. Twitter is supposed to be a public forum free from editorializing because they have legal immunity under 230, kind of like a phone company. Big tech is a monolith that suppresses and destroys all alternative platforms. You don't know what you're talking about, clearly.
    1
  162.  @darthvader098  German National Socialists and Italian fascists were not exactly fiscally conservative and they surely aren't considered left-wing. Neither are Arab Ba'athists. I don't believe in some bullshit horseshoe theory, but you can't really call anyone who isn't fiscally conservative a leftist.
    1
  163.  @darthvader098  Sounds like a lot of what the Nazis did. Are you saying they're leftists? Lol please don't tell me you're dumb enough to believe the horseshoe theory is valid.
    1
  164.  @darthvader098  Of course. I'm asking you if you believe in the horseshoe theory, which basically states that the far-right and far-left are essentially the same thing. I gave you examples of right-wing governments that are/were statist and still provide/d things for their people (like healthcare and education) that are typically associated with what you keep calling "leftist socialism." Do you think the NSDAP were leftists because they gave they provided socialized healthcare and education?
    1
  165.  @stopitnow7762  I disagree. The loudest "conservative" voices are the most moderate, and this is by design. The Left controls the media and puts moderates in the spotlight on purpose to set the Overton Window to the Left. Moderates act as gatekeepers. The result serves the broad globalist Left in multiple ways. Firstly, it helps maintain liberalism and globalism as the mainstream default. Second, it helps normalize extreme leftism within the current political lexicon. Thirdly, it keeps people on the Right from straying further right away from liberalism and globalism into more genuine forms of rightism. .
    1
  166. The nerve of this slag talking about their "rules" when Twitter is supposed to be a platform free from editorializing. Twitter blatantly violates 230, and they do it largely for political purposes.
    1
  167.  @jordan3400  No they actually can't legally if they want to keep their legal immunity. If they want to editorialize, they are a publisher, not a platform under Section 230. Educate yourself before piping off you little twerp.
    1
  168. When I hear it, I think about how Islam is the only religion where the fundamentalists are called "radicals." Those who follow a literalist interpretation of every other religion are called fundamentalists or ultra orthodox. Radicalism is by definition a divergence from the fundamental nature of something. It is the opposite of fundamentalism. This might seem trivial or semantic until you really stop and think about the psychology behind this and WHY Islamic fundamentalists are called "radicals." I think it's basically a form of projection and a way of insulating the fundamental principles of Islam from criticism. They call fundamentalists "radical" so that people believe that fundamentalists are practicing some extreme form of Islam, when really they are just following the literal ordainments of their holy scriptures.
    1
  169.  @IbrahimKhan-gv6cw  Yes, we really appreciate all those beautiful trucks of peace here in the West.
    1
  170.  @jasonwebster8027  Pretty much every Western European city. People walk around in London and Paris with the ISIS flag draped over their back and nothing happens to them.
    1
  171.  @EzMasterKH  Yeah, more than likely. Although I learned Spanish from a Mexican who actually cared about speaking Spanish properly. He didn't speak with a Castilian accent or anything, but his Spanish was excellent.
    1
  172.  @WilsonNeverStopSwimming  My Spanish is 10 times better, regardless of how many years he lived there. I've been speaking Spanish for over 20 years. I live in a state that is majority Hispanic. I was trained at the Defense Language Institute. Your opinion is far more irrelevant than mine, believe you me.
    1
  173.  @mikeboshko2623  In what way, Mike? Use your words.
    1
  174.  @mikeboshko2623  Fair enough. There are distinct accents from different parts of every country, but in general, Australian English is more homogeneous in comparison to Mexican Spanish. There are about 10 different varieties of Mexican Spanish. That is a great deal of phonetic diversity. This guy's Mexican Spanish sounds like Norteño, which is not surprising, considering he likely learned from a bunch of illiterate cartel slaves from Sonora or somewhere similar.
    1
  175.  @LosBerkos  Cual amigos? Jaja no tengo amigos aqui.
    1
  176.  @s3bas.nv6  I'm Ron Burgundy?
    1
  177.  @hugotarga  At least I get invited "Hugo."
    1
  178.  @hugotarga  Okay "Hugo"...I think your life is sad, considering you commented on a 1 year old thread. Moreover, instead of making a rational comment, you just made a cheap, low-IQ insult. Congrats.
    1
  179.  @hugotarga  Ok "Hugo." You can't even construct a grammatically correct sentence, AND you had to edit it. CA public schools perhaps?
    1
  180.  @hugotarga  Ok "Hugo." You can't even construct a grammatically legible sentence. CA public schools perhaps?
    1
  181.  Cue Truth  Liar
    1
  182.  @koto305  Oh look, you did research and he's a liar. Imagine my shock.
    1
  183.  @jenniferharnett3296  Obviously, your group isn't a collective entity, and therefore you cannot be assigned with collectivized guilt. So the actions of Israel shouldn't make you cringe unless you felt a sense of belonging and therefore, onus, for the actions of Israel. I think it's natural to feel a little onus, even if it's slightly illogical. That said, I have a question. In my country, members of your group totally dominate the New Left movement. Members of your group basically pioneered Critical Race Theory, which collectively frames my people and our culture as inherently evil and in need of dismantling, which leads a lot of people to hate your group, given that members of your group are the ones mainly responsible for the creation, maintenance, and distribution of these borderline genocidal ideologies. So I guess my question is twofold: 1.) since you feel onus for the actions of Israel, do you also feel any sense of onus for the overwhelming overrepresentation of your people in movements that are designed to subvert and destroy Europeans as well as traditional Western culture and civilization? I'm asking this honestly and not in bad faith. I'm genuinely curious and I rarely get a chance to speak to anyone from your group. I always wondered why more of your people don't denounce the actions of those within your group. I think if more of them did, there wouldn't be nearly as much anti-Semitism.
    1
  184. Jay Lee Are you denying that there are average differences between different human groups? If you are, you should know that isn't a widely held belief amongst scientists.
    1
  185. Thomas Kiernan Dumbest comment ever. We conquered their land in a war, and to say that CA would still be the 5th largest economy if it has developed under Mexican control is not only unlikely, but impossible to know. Moreover, CA is now the 7th largest economy in the world, not the 5th. It was the 5th before Leftism destroyed it.
    1
  186. T REX Inane comment. Mexico did not have to become a failed narco-state just because drugs were illegal in America. Mexico was a shitty country before the War on Drugs even began.
    1
  187. We don't live under the rule of law. We live under the rule of the elite. How do I know this? Because the law doesn't apply to the elite.
    1
  188. The cvck that Joe has as his guest here is clueless. This isn't an "America problem," it's a leftist liberal problem. "Why don't we move them to Wyoming, they don't have enough people there" reeee yeah and that's because we don't want bums here. They aren't welcome.
    1
  189.  @MIngalls  Wyoming is beautiful. But keep telling everyone no one wants to live here. We don't want bums or people who are clueless as to why all these bums exist.
    1
  190. @Moto Why are there so many in New York then? Mark Twain, a native of Missouri said "the coldest winter I ever spent was a summer in San Francisco." The whole weather narrative is only half true. Homeless people go to cities where liberal people tolerate them and sustain them.
    1
  191.  @MIngalls  The land here isn't useless...lol...but keep that narrative going. We like that people are ignorant about our state. It keeps them wallowing in their multicultural urban hellscapes where bums and leftist tyranny are plentiful. The fed owns about 45% of CA, too. States with the greatest natural beauty tend to be that way. If you like concrete jungle and desk jobs, Wyoming is definitely not for you. I'll give you that. ;)
    1
  192. ​ @MIngalls  Wow. You've written me quite a reply there. You are obviously personally invested in defending liberal leftist ideology from any responsibility in creating this problem, even though it's clear as day there is a direct correlation. "Republicans don’t like any of the solutions to fix the problems and offer no solutions of their own." Sociocultural conservatism IS our solution to the degeneracy and idleness that often causes problems which directly lead to homelessness (such as substance abuse and familial dysfunction). We recognize that social liberalism and dependence on government creates and maintains a lack of moral standards which directly leads to societal instability. Imagine homelessness as a bathtub that's overflowing onto the floor. We want to shut off the valve and then find ways of dealing with the mess. Liberals want to pretend the water isn't coming from the valve, and instead run around looking for more effective methods of mopping up the water that's leaking and destroying the floor. The liberal way is an exercise in futility, because you're too selfishly invested in your worldview to ever admit it is causing the problems. Take overpopulation and joblessness, for example. Liberal leftists pretend like those problems cannot possibly be the result of policies that they support, like mass unsustainable immigration. So these problems can and never will be reversed, because people will always make up some other excuse or rationalization. So all that said, you go ahead and blame whatever cause you want. Denial isn't just a river in Africa. All the bums are in your state, not mine, and it's not because Wyoming is a bad place to live. It'll only get worse the longer you refuse to admit the real problem.
    1
  193. ​ @MIngalls  I'm also not a member of the GOP or a Christian. Your mind is stuck looking at the world through a false binary lens. And yes, part of it is absolutely the tolerance that locals and city officials show them. Denver made it legal to camp in public. Now they have tent cities. Oh, and Denver is pretty cold in the winter it turns out. The reason homeless people go there is because the people and government are liberal. They can effectively exploit the empathy of the locals and the government. They are provided with an enabling environment. They are provided with handouts, even drug paraphernalia in some places. The correlation is really quite obvious. The level of cognitive dissonance required to deny it is pretty depressing.
    1
  194. ​@Moto I can think of a lot more hospitable climates than Seattle, SF, Denver and New York. Of course it's even worse in areas that have nice weather AND liberal policies like LA, but liberal policies are enough to draw them in even if the weather isn't ideal for outdoor living. Also, you'll notice that in the graphic Jamie pulled up, the bums coming and going from Florida were all coming from Orlando and Tampa (where all the New York liberals go to retire) and Miami, which is overwhelmingly multicultural and left.
    1
  195.  @MIngalls  Right. Because handing out taxpayer subsidized junkie injection kits just screams "drugs aren't welcome here." Lol like i said, you're in denial. Enabling their drug use only makes the problem worse. Denver's tent cities are there because the city allows them to be there. There is no such BS in the cities in WY. They aren't solutions at all. They're poorly thought out bandaids are best, most of which actually contribute to the root problem, which people like you refuse to admit and address.
    1
  196. @Moto It's not a metaphor. Lol it means the summers are cold because it's foggy so much. But anyways it was just funny because you said Missouri and he's from there. What about Denver? And no, at least half of the homeless people in cities are from different places. They migrate there to be homeless there.
    1
  197.  @juliahorn3659  Wtf are you even talking about? It's like you're having a conversation with your inner voices. I honestly don't care what you suspect of me. I'm an American and "my people" are Americans. End of discussion.
    1
  198.  @juliahorn3659  What about end of discussion don't you understand?
    1
  199. I welcome anyone to watch my content, so long as they come in good faith. That is why I created it. I will not entertain malevolent or deceptive people though. Especially ones who think attempting to assassinate a person's character is a valid form of argument.
    1
  200.  @juliahorn3659  I was not addressing you. I was addressing all others who may read this. As I said...good faith only, which excludes you. You and I have nothing to discuss.
    1
  201.  @juliahorn3659  END OF DISCUSSION.
    1
  202. @TheFlyingOtis: Ikr, I was thinking...wait, what? why? The last thing this country needs is more fucking unsustainable immigration at this point. Anyone who supports mass immigration at this point supports the destruction of this country and the American standard of living.
    1
  203. @Aaron Ludwig: I am refuting legal immigration, for a lot of reasons. One is that even legal immigrants and their children vote overwhelmingly for socialist policies; the more immigrants of color we have in this country, the more likely the Left will win elections and keep winning elections, eventually resulting in a one-party state. Two is that legal immigration is not always based on merit. There are a lot of legal immigrants that are uneducated, unskilled, and low-IQ. There are only so many low skill positions and there will only be less in the future if globalism and automation continue to evaporate these jobs. Three is that legal immigration leads to chain migration of that immigrant's family. Therefore admitting 1 is really admitting several more, many of whom are children or the elderly that do not produce, only consume. Four is that immigrants from completely incompatible cultures can still legally immigrate here. There are some cultures that simply do not integrate into Western culture. They come from cultures that reject many of the foundations of our society. Five is that we do not need more immigration, legal or otherwise. Part of the reason birthrates are so low is that the system is unsustainable and people are not confident in a sustainable future. People that are already here understand that and adhere to it, but immigrants do not and breed unsustainably, putting undue stress of our systems.
    1
  204. Joe "hate speech isn't free speech" Rogan.
    1
  205.  @678rwhp  The cops didn't kill him because he was DUI. They shot him because he attacked them. stole one of their weapons and tried to shoot them with it. Do you even know the details of the case being discussed?
    1
  206. ​ @Obi-WanJabr0ni  I read what you wrote. It was moronic and false. You said he died because of the way the police treated him (as if he was a murder suspect). That is a dumb take in and of itself and shows how little you know about law enforcement. The police don't treat drunk driving suspects like murder suspects and the APD didn't treat him like a murder suspect that night either. They only treated him like someone they suspected of driving drunk, which is what he was. You then implied that the reason why this guy died was because the way the police treated him, not his own aggressive actions towards the police. I didn't assume that's what you said. That's what you said in plain (albeit very poorly commanded) English for all to see. Now you're trying to gaslight me as if I'm the one who misconstrued what you said, even though you've confirmed that was your position in your subsequent comment. lol Did you even watch the video? The reason this incident escalated to lethal force was because this guy resisted arrest, disarmed the police officer of his taser, and tried to fire the taser (considered a lethal weapon under Georgia law) at the cop and he fled. The police sat there for close to an hour with that guy before they finally placed him under arrest. They were totally polite and professional with him. That isn't how they treat people suspected of murder. The fact that you think it was the cops' fault tells me two things about you: you didn't even watch the video of the incident (and you're a liar) or the way you perceived the police's actions is completely irrational. The police didn't escalate the situation. They reasonably suspected he was DUI based on his actions. They conducted FSTs and a breathalyzer to establish probable cause of that suspicion. Then attempted to arrest him and he became hostile. They didn't abuse him or use excessive force or place him in cuffs aggressively or unreasonably. They just tried to handcuff him, and as soon as they did that, he started fighting them. If he would have simply complied, gone to jail, and not attacked the police, he would be alive today. People like you are so insanely anti-police, you dishonestly spin everything as their fault, even when there is really nothing they could have reasonably done to prevent the incident. Your expectations of the police are completely unreasonable, and therefore your position is completely unreasonable. The only person who would have such willfully irrational takes is one who secretly just wants lawlessness and for the police to have no power to enforce the law whatsoever. Any questions?
    1
  207.  @ChillyChav  Take a look at the comment section. This is AVS to a tee, dude.
    1
  208. A liberal dictatorship. Lol that is an oxymoron. This idiot liberal professor did the same thing saying "authoritarian populism." Populism is the opposite of elitism. It's anti-authoritarian.
    1
  209.  @dontcare7086  It's disgusting. The police are not the trigger happy racist murderers the media tries to portray them to be. They're mostly very brave and reasonable people. The media and the Left have made things 10 times more dangerous for police in this country. They have blood on their hands, if you ask me.
    1
  210.  @glock_grippin_meme_viewin1309  Yes, those things do make it difficult to fire bad cops and punish them. But who in their right mind would become a cop if qualified immunity didn't exist? QI is the only thing that makes it possible to have police if you think about it, because QI also protects good cops from being financially and legally abused and ruined by private citizens. No one would risk becoming a police officer if they had to defend themselves from being sued for every little thing or get put in prison for the rest of their life for making an honest mistake. So taking away qualified immunity is totally unrealistic. And while I'm all for restricting the power of unions, it's the Left who champion them i.e. the same people who want police reform. If they deprive the police of union rights that every other professions get, they will be discriminating, and will lose that battle in court against police unions. So they need look to other ways to weed out bad cops. Attacking unions and qualified immunity won't work.
    1
  211.  @TG-ub7mk  They didn't kill him because he was DUI. They killed him because he attacked a cop, disarmed him of his taser and fired it at him. It's deceptive and ignorant people like you who make it impossible to have a conversation about use of force incidents.
    1
  212.  @TG-ub7mk  He wasn't non-violent. He attacked a cop and disarmed him of a weapon (a taser) which is considered a lethal weapon under Georgia law. Then he fired that weapon at the cop as he was fleeing. You're just completely ignorant of the facts of the incident in question.
    1
  213.  @TG-ub7mk  I have thoroughly enjoyed watching as you have attempted to troll me. It was especially amusing to see you display such a primitive level of impulse control that you couldn't even make a comment that was PG enough to not get shadowbanned by YT. All because you lost the argument on this thread so thoroughly that you couldn't let it go. So you go and try to attack my character. Also notice how, despite my political views, YOU are the one who brought race into this conversation. Absolutely pathetic. lol
    1
  214.  @svenNL  The point though is that even if they moved the basket down, the men would dominate the women in that new environment. Lowering the basket would actually make it even easier for men to beat women. So yeah, moving the basket down would make the women's version more watchable and exciting if it were just the women playing each other, but that's kind of irrelevant to the argument this cvck is making. The sport would still not be designed for women to be better than men; men would still dominate them if the basket was lower. You can't really design a sport or athletic that less athletic people will win, as that kind of defeats the point of athletics.
    1
  215. ​ @cdub1059  HAHAHAHA no...Adam is stupid...and wrong. Women don't have more endurance than men, especially at the high end of the spectrum. Men dominate all endurance sports. Cycling, triathlons, decathlons, marathons, you name it. Men dominate women in practically every imaginable physical contest. Whether it requires strength, power, or endurance, it doesn't matter. Men also have way more pain tolerance, especially when it comes to athletic exertion. Women are more flexible, but very rarely does being flexible alone give you an athletic advantage. The record for swimming the English channel is 30 minutes less for men than it is for women (6:55 to 7:25). Marathon record is 1:59:40.2 for men, and 2:14:04 for women, Men's 1500 meter freestyle swimming record is 14:31.02 as opposed to women's 15:20.48. Men's 5000 meter run is 12:49.60, women's 5000 meter run is 14:18.86. In 24hrs Cross-Country Skiing, a man has skied 470 km as opposed to 375 km for a woman.
    1
  216.  @cdub1059  Lol okay "sTuDiEs sHoW" but all results of all endurance sport contests show that men outperform women. "LoOk iT uP"... yeah... I did. The verdict is that you're wrong. If that's "one-upping" you...ok. You're still wrong.
    1
  217.  @cdub1059  Ad hominem. You're wrong. Cope more.
    1
  218.  @cdub1059  ​ The first result when entering "physical advantages of females" is from "Clearvuehealth," and is little more than a poorly constructed blogpost. It is also totally deceptive. It says "in one study, researchers found that women outperformed men in a key measure of endurance. When pushed to their physical limits, women are able to produce more their power and their maximum torque compared to men after a brief rest." What it fails to mention is that the one article they're citing to support this very generalized and poorly worded claim only studied ONE very specific type of muscular movement (plantar flexors), which are tiny little muscles in your toes!! HAHAHAHAHA So they used some totally obscure example to argue a much larger general statement, which is totally deceptive (cherry picking and inductive fallacy). That is what deniers of male physical superiority must resort to in order to make an argument: deception. The vast majority of endurance contests are not "constructed" to benefit men. A marathon goes like this: run 26.2 miles. Ready? Go. There is nothing that gives men a "constructed" advantage in the design of that event. The thing that gives us an advantage is our average physiology. The global average time for a marathon stands at around 4 hours 21 minutes – with men's average times at 4 hours 13 minutes, and women at 4 hours 42 minutes. If women have better endurance, why is this the case? The proof is in the pudding and the results speak for themselves. All physical events are dominated by males. Now do me a favor and google this : "sex differences in human physiology" and tell me what it says. :) F off with your projection. The one making excuses is you.
    1
  219.  @cdub1059  ​ Since I doubt you'll be honest enough to provide accurate findings of "sex differences in human physiology" I'll list a few: ON AVERAGE, men have: *longer, thicker, stronger, denser bones. *stronger, thicker, denser connective tissue. *stronger, more massive and denser, muscles. *higher caloric conversion rates to muscle. *higher muscle-mass to body-mass ratio. *lower body fat percentage. *significantly higher hand-grip strength. *greater lung volume per body mass *greater oxygen-carrying capacity in the blood. *more blood cells per cubic millimeter of blood. *higher peripheral pain tolerance. *higher inter-hemispheric brain connectivity (motor skills). *higher testosterone, which is an anabolic steroid that aids in recovery. Athletic contests aren't artificially "constructed" to make men superior. Men are biologically constructed to be athletically superior. People like yourself are just butthurt about reality and in denial for ideological purposes.
    1
  220.  @cdub1059  I did that and posted what I found in the very first result: deceptive faulty generalizations.
    1
  221. ​ @cdub1059  ​ No, actually that is just more projection on your part. The vast scientific consensus supports my argument. In other words, you are the one who needs to cherry pick information and use deception to make an argument. Stop embarrassing yourself. You are wrong and so is the beta Nu-male Adam.
    1
  222.  @cdub1059  My little brain? Hahaha and there you have it...that's what it always boils down to with ideologues like you. You spew your lies until you're proven wrong. Then you personally attack. Then you lie some more. You originally said "Adam is right" (he argued that male athletic superiority was basically socially constructed and not naturally occurring). You then said females have greater endurance and pain tolerance than men. All of the claims you made are objectively, provable false, and I have the consensus of scientific research (based on quantitative data observation) and the RESULTS of all endurance contests in the history of sports to support of my position. All you have is cherry picked, totally disingenuous, ideologically motivated lies. Read THIS again until your pea brain can comprehend.
    1
  223.  @cdub1059  What studies are you even talking about? Provide them. Name them. You can't. The study I am referring to was the first citation used in the article that was the very first result in the search you requested. It was cited in after it made a general statement saying women have greater endurance than men. But the academic study only made the claim that women had greater "fatigability" in the small muscles in the toes. Liars always project and blame everyone else when they get exposed. Everyone is just too stupid to understand you, right? It's not that you're a liar or completely wrong. It's that you're just misunderstood and we're stupid. Lol gtfoh. You said women could swim further through cold water. You said they have greater endurance and pain tolerance. You're wrong. Men have routinely dominated the English channel swim. Why is that? I thought women had greater endurance and pain tolerance?
    1
  224.  @cdub1059  House chores? Are you effing serious? Ever notice how the house chores that require motor skill, endurance and physical strength are done by the man? Lol gtfoh. Stop embarrassing yourself.
    1
  225.  @cdub1059  Simply being alive is not a sport, you moron. Wtf are you even talking about? Lol you've completely pivoted. First you claimed women have more endurance and pain tolerance and could swim longer in cold water. Now you're saying they simply live longer on average and are able to do house chores for longer without losing their mind, and those things somehow constitute a physical advantage. May I remind you that the original argument was about athletics? Lol you're grasping at straws.
    1
  226.  @cdub1059  Your argument has now devolved into semantics. "dEfiNe a sPoRt!" Reeee. Playing a video game is not a sport. Sport requires physical exertion, which is why men have a physiological advantage. We cannot create something that requires physical exertion where women have an advantage over men. Playing video games, washing dishes, and being alive is not sport. You are absolutely embarrassing yourself.
    1
  227. Mushrooms are actually closer to being animals than plants.
    1
  228.  @unknownx7252  I'm not a fan of Abrahamic religiosity, but all this Afrocentric BS is not supported by science or history. The academic complex is entirely enthralled with so-called "emancipation politics." Wouldn't you think if there was some kind of credible evidence that proved Africans were more advanced, they would mainstream it?
    1
  229.  @Dremac5  Leo Weiner is a complete fraud. Him and all the Afrocentric morons like Ivan Van Sertima who based their entire pseudo theories on this work. They are considered to be complete quacks and frauds in the archeological and anthropological academic communities. You are the one making yourself look foolish by bringing up such a cliche and discredited source.
    1
  230.  @unknownx7252  Napoleon's troops didn't blow the nose off the Sphinx. Lol you really need to read something about ancient sculptures and not just some Afrocentric blog post. Sculptures throughout the ancient world were vandalized by destroying the nose of the sculpture. It was thought the soul of the person the sculpture depicted lived throughout the statue. Destroying the nose was hence a way of suffocating that soul and killing it. Most of the vandalism took place for political or religious reasons. It was iconoclastic. Please educate yourself. This is sad.
    1
  231.  @Dremac5  Columbus' journal didn't say the Amerindians were African, you liar. The vast majority of research has proven Afrocentric theories to be false. Btw, you still haven't named one actual example of physical evidence that proves your claim. All you have is lies and discredited fringe theories.
    1
  232.  @Dremac5  African skeletons were not found and there was no Egyptian civilization in the Americas. Lol "12 scholars" 😂 I'll bet you believe that nonsense about the Grand Canyon. WE WAZ KANGZ N SHEEIT. SPACE GODZ N SHEEIT. People like you are absolutely hopeless. You have such an acute inferiority complex that you literally need to fabricate your own version of history where your ancestors are the supreme culture/race. It's so obvious and pathetic...even a bit depressing.
    1
  233.  @unknownx7252  I wouldn't bother. If you have a shred of honesty and intelligence, you will realize most Afrocentric theories are based on lies and are devoid of credible evidence.
    1
  234.  @unknownx7252  If you need to deceive yourself to raise your psyche, perhaps the problem is with your psyche, not with the consensus narrative. Consensus historical narratives are not "whitewashed." They have been deduced and agreed upon by academics of every race and ethnicity imaginable. So you're basing your reasoning for believing discredited fringe theories on a falsehood. I am not going to get into the country you mentioned and biblical prophecy, because half the comments I write that mention them or their state get deleted or shadowbanned. But know that you and I are probably more in alignment in our understanding of ethnohistory involving that particular group than we are with our understanding of pre-Columbian American ethnohistory.
    1
  235. It's true, they are mostly the ones who cry about things like this, but they learn this ideology and behavior in academia, so really it is the fault of these so-called "educators" who are encouraging them to be activistic and hypersensitive to issues like this. Teens are easy to manipulate and the most emotionally unstable demographics, which is why they make such good acolytes for these greasy Marxist academics.
    1
  236. @Tony Grams: Meaningless comment with no argument within it. Tell Richard Parker, who thinks its cute to inject "kkk" into the word Republican, even though Republicans freed the slaves. I denounce the KKK, and I see very well that elements of the Democrats and Republicans form an establishment class that is the enemy of the people. But the KKK wasn't just started by the Democrats, they were the Democrats' political terrorism apparatus for over a century. 30,000 of them marched in DC in 1925.
    1
  237. Darrin Cunningham Bullshit. The Southern Strategy is a lie. Only one Southern Democratic Senator became a Republican after the Civil Rights Act, and that was Strom Thurmond. Meanwhile, the Dems were electing Robert Byrd in 2004, an actual Klan member who voted against the Civil Rights Act. He was also chums with the Clintons who are Southern Democrats from that same tradition.
    1
  238. Tony Grams Insults are all you have because you have no intelligible argument.
    1
  239. OneLifeCycle Putting unrealistic dreams before reality. Sounds like the modern mantra of the pubic educational system, which is no doubt the same place these fools acquired their idiotic views about national sovereignty and borders.
    1
  240.  @andreathesexy1  Also...you are very confused. Asian is not an ethnicity, it's more of a pseudo racial category based on geographic descent. Indian is not a race or an ethnicity either, it is basically just a citizen of India, because India has hundreds of ethnic groups living in it. Jamaica is a multiethnic country with people from all sorts of ancestral backgrounds. It is a mixture and hence isn't an ethnic state. That is why Jamaican and Cuban and Dominican basically just means you were born there or hold citizenship in that country. Most Jamaicans are ancestrally from sub-Saharan Africa. There is no Jamaican ethnicity. They are a multiethnic group, just like Americans.
    1
  241.  @anjaninator  If some indigenous American nation decides to subvert their own tribal identity by totally ignoring the genetic component of their ethnicity, that is their prerogative. But it will be the end of any meaningful definition of their existence. That is what I'm trying to say. In England, it's happening the same way. The English are an ethnic group whose identity has a genetic component and has for centuries. But now that reverse colonization is taking place, leftists and migration advocates are trying to subvert the criteria required fire English identity to make it "inclusive." That essentially makes it meaningless because it negates the ancestral criteria for it. What belongs to everyone belongs to no one.
    1
  242. They've already transferred them to actual combat jobs, just not elite units.
    1
  243. I agree. He's an invertebrate cringelord who would never survive unless protected by civilization. I don't trust anyone until they earn my trust and I don't expect anything less from them. Those in my inner-circle I would trust with my life or the life of my family.
    1
  244. ​ @lillime2577  That is not accurate, sorry. At the time the Pilgrims left England, the country was already majority Protestant and the Church of England was not part of the Roman Catholic Church. The Pilgrims were also not Quakers, the majority of them held Brownist beliefs. Quakers were a different English Separatist or Dissenter group. These groups separated from the Church of England in the 16th-17th century for various reasons, most of which had to do with the opposition of state religion, which was a remnant of Catholicism. Separatists went off and tried to form their own congregations in various parts of England, but were persecuted by the government (because the state and Church of England were one and the same). That is why they left.
    1
  245.  @origineeman6421  Basing your entire understanding of paleo-American ethnic history on one set of bones is completely ridiculous. Forensic anthropologists can usually determine origin from craniofacial structure, but not always. Moreover, the majority of forensic anthropologists suggested that Luzia Woman's craniofacial structure was more consistent with Austroloid features, not Congoid ones, which would still suggest Asiatic origin. If you think one skeleton proves Congoid migration to the Amazon region which predates Asiatic ones, how can you ignore something like the Solutrean hypothesis, which provides a far more robust archeological claim that European migrations to North America predate both the Clovis culture AND the Luzia Woman? Something tells me it has something to do with ethnocentrism.
    1
  246.  @origineeman6421  There were also genetic tests carried out by a 72 member, 8 nationality research team that confirmed that Luzia woman was neither Australoid or Congoid. Sorry, but your Afrocentric pseudo-history doesn't stand up to hard science. But I guess when you think everything is just a white supremacist plot, evidence goes out the window. https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2018-11/fda-tnf110918.php
    1
  247.  @Alex.the.humble  By that logic, colonizing Africa was just reclaiming our ancestral homeland. Lol You can't have it both ways.
    1
  248. The whole cultural appropriation argument is just another way that Marxists expose the main tenet of their ideology, which is anti-whiteness. And yes, anti-white ideology is mostly followed by dumb self-loathing white leftists who think they're being virtuous by applying racist double standards to themselves and other whites. But still, it's obvious the whole argument is anti-white and imbued with neo-Marxism, because none of the people bitching about a white guy making a nonwhite cuisine could give two shits about a nonwhite making white cuisine.
    1
  249.  @jakefromstatefarm142  Thanks for the novel. Try to condense your thoughts. "Halfwits talk much, but say little."
    1
  250.  @jakefromstatefarm142  "Hormonal imbalances from birth control are to blame for mass shootings and terrorist attacks more than ideology." "You got beat" -silly deluded liberal guy.
    1
  251.  @jakefromstatefarm142  Stating that you came at me in bad faith is not name calling. Lol
    1
  252.  @jakefromstatefarm142  The radical right is filled with young men who are totally disaffected with the society which liberal/leftism has created. They turn to extreme countercultures because the culture surrounding them feels poisonous. I realize that as a liberal, cause and effect might be difficult for you to grasp, but when society and culture degenerates and young men have no structure... nothing to give their life significant meaning... bad things tend to happen.
    1
  253.  @jakefromstatefarm142  I think you have a lot of time on your hands. Four comments to every one I make? Lol bombarding someone with more arguments than is humanely possible to address and then claiming victory when the person cannot answer them all... that's call a Gish Gallop. Or maybe you just drank too much coffee.
    1
  254.  @jakefromstatefarm142  I thought name calling is the true sign of low-IQ and being uneducated? Lol if it weren't for double standards, I doubt you'd have any standards at all.
    1
  255.  @jakefromstatefarm142  And for the record, I thought you made some valid points regarding what contributes to this problem, but your attitude and decorum was so lacking in honor, you really made civilized discourse an impossibility. You began this thread pretending to be someone who was simply curious. Then you did nothing but attack. I do think there are physical, chemical reasons this problem is growing worse. But it's also absolutely cultural and social. But hey... denial isn't just a river in Africa.
    1
  256.  @jakefromstatefarm142  Btw, you seem obsessed with argumentation as a form of competition. Maybe someday you'll graduate to sharing ideas and personal growth instead of indulging yourself with self-appointed victories in mindless argumentative battles. But hey, perhaps that's asking too much of a person like you. It takes good faith and humility to engage in constructive discourse.
    1
  257.  @jakefromstatefarm142  Obviously. You're personally invested in an ideology which I was crediting with a role in this violence. Republican/Democrat dichotomy lacks nuance. You spoke of liberalism and freedom. Gun rights are one of the highest forms of liberty. But you think no one should have gun rights? Violence is only made easier with guns. I think the problem is far deeper...mainly sociocultural but compounded by contributing factors like the poisons people are willfully and unwillingly putting in their bodies.
    1
  258.  @jakefromstatefarm142  The Founders would disagree and were radically liberal, especially for their time. An armed citizenry was considered totally unthinkable in the 18th century, when the world was largely dominated by absolute monarchies. Nothing has really changed since then; our 2A endows US citizens with an unalienable liberty that few others share. Without a wildly unpopular (and possibly nationally disastrous) political reversal of the 2A, guns aren't going away. So I would say the best option is focusing on what is actually motivating people to kill each other. I would say the atomizing effects of cultural and social liberalism, globalism, and consumerism/materialism that are the result of economic neoliberalism/corporate fascism is playing a significant role in all this.
    1
  259.  @jakefromstatefarm142  Go to London. There are no guns allowed but more murders per capita than New York City. People kill people. Guns are just a more effective tool. You might have noticed that the cities with the strictest gun regulations are still the murder capitals of the US. The problem is cultural and I dare say even demographic in nature.
    1
  260.  @jakefromstatefarm142  Also...if you're intending on immigrating, just keep in mind that the nations you mentioned have far stricter immigration policies. If you are an American without a in-demand skill, good luck...
    1
  261.  @jakefromstatefarm142  I never said I was a Republican or I believe in the concept of God-given rights. It's usually the left that's always claiming things like free movement and healthcare are innate human rights. But all in all, it sounds to me like you aren't a liberal at all in any meaningful way. Liberals believe in innate individual rights. Leftists believe in statism and social engineering.
    1
  262.  @jakefromstatefarm142  There are more murders in the U.S. committed with the use of a hammer than there are committed with so-called "assault weapons."
    1
  263. ​ @jakefromstatefarm142  No. I said more died from a hammer than died from "assault weapons" which are not all weapons, but are weapons that bureaucrats and their propagandists have subjectively define as such. I am not using a play on words, others are. If you've never heard of a gun doing something great, you're not looking around enough. Sure, they are used to do evil, but evil people can use anything to do evil deeds. Slavery was not an amendment, emancipation was, and yes, I think that was a good thing. The more rights, the better, imo. I don't like government restrictions for the most part. Prohibition would fall under that. Prohibition was an anti-liberty amendment. I believe in the framework laid out by our Founders, for the most part. I believe in liberty, but freedom comes with great personal responsibility. Those who can't possess those liberties without using them to abuse people don't deserve those rights. People are not born criminal. Some have predispositions that are genetic, but they are shaped by their environments into criminals. Prevalent ideologies and sociocultural conditions have a great effect on people's behavior and mental health, to include criminality. We need to accept these things and attack the root cause of the problem instead of sacrificing our liberties and pretending society and culture has nothing to do with it. I recall an interview of an old grandma who was asked why she carried a firearm by some weasely reporter. "What are you scared of?" he asked her. "Nothing," she replied with a smirk, "because I have my .38 special and I know how to use it!"
    1
  264.  @jakefromstatefarm142  It doesn't put me on edge. It gives me comfort. I'm a military and police veteran though, so it's normal for me.
    1
  265.  @jakefromstatefarm142  They are all in areas that prohibit gun ownership for law abiding citizens. Criminals know they are prey. Convenience stores in decent areas have very few problems. Again...culture and demographics. The areas with stricter legislation have more crime.
    1
  266.  @jakefromstatefarm142  And moreover, I've responded to robberies in cities at convenience stores where the owner saved themselves and their property from abuse (and possibly even death) with their firearm.
    1
  267.  @jakefromstatefarm142  You must meet force with equal force. Without a very strict and noble culture and a homogenous nation(like the Swedes or the Japanese), it's almost impossible to have a totally harmonious society, whether the citizenry is armed or not. In lieu of those cultural conditions, it's either you have an armed citizenry or a police state.
    1
  268.  @jakefromstatefarm142  Racist = someone who won an argument against a leftist.
    1
  269.  @jakefromstatefarm142  You sound like one. Only a leftist would call someone a racist who is simply speaking the truth about the demographics of crime.
    1
  270.  @jakefromstatefarm142  The only people who frame homogeneous nation as racist are globalists and civic nationalists, who are basically just lukewarm globalists. By your logic, most nations in the world are racist, because most are much more homogeneous than America. I think you're stuck in an American civic mindset, which is very myopic. What I'm saying is that the more homogeneous a nation is, the more stable the society tends to be. I do think we can work together and be different and even separate. That is the entire argument for ethnic nationalism. You are a person with a different mindset, sure. So am I. And yet my mindset you've framed as evil by calling it racist. That is why you fail.
    1
  271.  @jakefromstatefarm142  Not even two kids born under the same roof will have equal outcomes. In light of this, the idea that different nations or groups will have equal outcomes is completely moronic and unfeasible. Everything is racist to a lemming like yourself...even reality itself. I have 3 children. Two boys aged 9 and 7 and a little girl aged 4. They are all beautiful and intelligent and kind and gentle and full of life. I will teach them to love and have pride in who they are, but also respect people who are different than them. I am not a member of any organized religion. If you can't figure out what my profile name means, you don't deserve to know. You can attempt to mock me as some right-wing caricature, but at the end of the day, all you're doing is disgracing yourself. Have a good night.
    1
  272.  @mikefarley5358  I didn't read this psychopath's last comment until just now. Telling someone their children will be future mass murderers...now that's class.
    1
  273. Just search the "aqueduct of Ninevah." It's the first search result. Also known as the aqueduct at Jerwan.
    1
  274.  @deshaunjensen2454  Yes sir, it was elevated. They engineered it to traverse a river and several small valleys. They used corbelled arches. The guy above said the Romans invented aqueducts. Then he seemingly lied and said the Romans invented elevated aqueducts. He was wrong in both instances. You're right though that their topography limited their need to build larger/higher structures. But given the complexity of the architecture they used, I think it's safe to assume they could have build something grander if they needed to.
    1
  275. The whole cultural appropriation argument is just another way that Marxists expose the main tenet of their ideology, which is anti-whiteness. And yes, anti-white ideology is mostly followed by dumb self-loathing white leftists who think they're being virtuous by applying racist double standards to themselves and other whites. But still, it's obvious the whole argument is anti-white and imbued with neo-Marxism, because none of the people bitching about a white guy making a nonwhite cuisine could give two shits about a nonwhite making white cuisine.
    1
  276. He's a moron. He's acting like the weather hasn't changed at all since humans have existed until now. There have been several warming and cooling periods just within recorded history. Primitive humans were able to live through extreme climatic variations. There are so many physical forces that effect the Earth's climate other than greenhouse gases. I'm all for changing the way we do things. I'm all for efficiency and sustainability and environmental protection. But I can't stand these climate alarmists and their propaganda.
    1
  277.  @johnraina4828  For sure, he worships at the shrine of Weather Potato.
    1
  278.  @Jmbbit138  You think it's just to censor people you consider "stupid?"
    1
  279. GoodAvatar This isn't about me so quit moving squirming around this topic. We could try to stamp out corruption in our own country, where the Koch Brothers do all of their operating, but you'll never be able to contain international crooks like Soros. I heard Soros say that he collaborated with his occupiers in an interview. Unless he was lying or the video was fake, I am not wrong. He has never discredited the interview and he had no reason to lie about it.
    1
  280. Yep he's a pussy. "Muh White privilege."
    1
  281.  @JohnDoeTheGoodGuy  Says the guy who probably lives in a gated lily white community nowhere nears any Pakistanis. If you lived around them, you'd feel the same way.
    1
  282.  @ehtashaamahmed8758  Right. Pakistan is nearly known for it's standards of cleanliness. lol
    1
  283. ​ @JohnDoeTheGoodGuy  Yeah, it's a stereotype, and guess what dipshit? Stereotypes are based on observed patterns! It's not like someone is just maliciously slandering them and making it up. They are known for being unsanitary. But if you want to go down the leftist/civglob "b-b-but nOt ALL" talking point...okidoki. Move into a Pakistani neighborhood. Or better yet, move to Pakistan. Hahaha
    1
  284. Yes. Emphasis on melting pot. It's not a salad bowl.
    1
  285. Or that another religion is supremacist. Pot...meet kettle.
    1
  286. ​ @a.f.6929  I never said that. Are you implying that I don't read any history?
    1
  287. Indeed there are. Most people are insanely ignorant when it comes to matters of anthropology. They can't seem to conceptualize the difference between race, ethnicity, and nationality.
    1
  288.  @andrew42000  Leftists always obsess about the NRA, which has essentially become a reactionary organization that exists solely as a result of the Left's blatant attempts to subvert our constitutional freedoms. The Left always creates their own worst enemies with their radicalism and insolent disregard of the law.
    1
  289.  @kiddoo906  Discrimination and lack of average opportunity are not the only cause of group outcome disparities. The average choices of individuals within certain groups as also a cause. Blacks are not disabled. There are literally billions of people in the world who would gladly trade places with the average American Black.
    1
  290. ​ @kiddoo906  Oh really? Haha and why would you do that unless you think a gap in wealth represents discrimination and victimhood? It's just like when feminists deceptively paint the "wage gap" as irrefutable evidence of systemic discrimination. In reality, it is an EARNINGS gap, not a wage gap, and the cumulative, average, and freely-made choices of individual women are the main factor that causes average economic outcome disparities between women and men. I suggest you read the book Discrimination and Disparities by Dr. Thomas Sowell.
    1
  291.  @kiddoo906  Do you have any actual thoughts of your own? Or just lies and links to racial grievance narratives?
    1
  292.  @kiddoo906  Nothing you've said yourself is an actual fact, it's the opposite. All you've provided is a bunch of propaganda that drives the same narrative...that outcome disparities equal discrimination. That is a leftist lie. Read Sowell. Save yourself before it's too late.
    1
  293.  @kiddoo906  Lol posting a bunch of articles doesn't mean you're dealing with facts. The mainstream academic and media narrative on this topic is a blatant lie pushed by egalitarian ideologues. They don't care about the truth. They care about implementing social change regardless of if the ends justify the means.
    1
  294.  @xImBeaST12321x  Some are ignorant of the lie they are peddling. Others are not.
    1
  295.  @valthomas9786  There were ...past tense. Now Blacks arguably have more economic mobility than Whites, considering they get educational and occupational preference. All I was saying here is that disparate outcomes are not exclusively the result of discrimination. You can't have an honest conversation about average group outcomes without having a conservation about average group behavior. And it's absolutely not obvious that humans are biologically the same. That is a totally ridiculous statement. Your notions of privilege and oppression are rooted in Marxist theory. They are debunked.
    1
  296.  @valthomas9786  I would suggest watching some Thomas Sowell or Coleman Hughes on this topic. These men are extremely intelligent Blacks who understand that unequal outcomes aren't evidence of discrimination and that specific cultural and behavior tendencies in Blacks are the greatest contributor to lesser outcomes.
    1
  297.  @MrGamelover23  Yes, and that is false. They don't need help, and to assume they do based on their race is disgusting. Equity politics are inherently tyrannical because they are trying to achieve the impossible.
    1
  298.  @MrGamelover23  Racial statistics and corresponding equity policies based on race. It's about race. But nice try.
    1
  299.  @MrGamelover23  Collectivizing an entire race and assigning them a singular "experience" is idiotic and arguably racist. Also, even if it were true that everyone from the same race experiences the same thing, which is false, trying to "account" for that can only be accomplished by collectivizing other races and sanctioning discrimination against them. Equity is impossible without injustice and tyranny.
    1
  300. ​ @MrGamelover23  Long term, forcing equal outcomes is not a victory for anyone, even the least productive and most parasitic elements of a society, regardless of race. It is societal suicide. And also, nothing I said to you was a trivialization of their historical grievances. It is you who is infantilizing Blacks and assuming they need help based solely on their history and race instead of their individual situations. It is you who is collectivizing their experiences as if they constitute a single entity with a hivemind. It is you who is failing to see that forcing equity between groups is not only impossible, but requires tyrannical social engineering and sanctioned racial discrimination against individuals just because they happen to belong to a group that is achieving better outcomes. It is discrimination based on race, which is racism, and it is wrong. Trying to weaponize their historical grievances to usher in destructive socialist equity politics is deceptive and manipulative.
    1
  301. ​ @MrGamelover23  Also lol @ the recommendation of watching "13th." I watched that years ago, and it is a piece of pure propagandistic race pimpery in the format of a low budget PBS special. Of course the left-wing dominated film industry gushed over it, but that is of course what they would do, now isn't it? The film basically pushes the same painfully false and simple-minded leftist narrative that is so typical: that Blacks are perpetual victims devoid of any agency and everything negative that ever befalls them is not their own fault or the fault of other Blacks, but the fault of white people or whatever "system" or sets of societal standards to which they are expected to conform.
    1
  302. ​ @MrGamelover23  The better questions are ones you should ask yourself. At what point will you stop thinking of and referring to Black individuals as a collective entity? At what point will you realize that Black individuals don't need (and many times don't want) you treating them like feeble victims? At what point will you stop blaming every problem that befalls a Black individual on the past? At what point will you realize that racial history is weaponized for ulterior political motives? I'm guessing you'll never come to any sensible conclusions about any of these questions. You're too brainwashed and think you're virtuous by pretending people who happen to be Black need to be coddled just to have any success. Forget we all live in the most prosperous nation in human history and Black people have the aid of state-sanctioned racial discrimination which favors them in both academia and employment, if they so chose to take advantage of it.
    1
  303.  @MrGamelover23  Reformulate your questions to something that is akin to a salient thought, and perhaps I would answer. It's impossible for me to answer a question that assumes all Black people are the same.
    1
  304.  @jonm7888  "I looked up the definition" Okay. It differs from my explanation? Please provide. I'm not a fucking economist bro.
    1
  305.  @HiroshimaXl  Ah yes the neckbeard in the basement meme. That's almost as surefire to appear as Godwin's Law in any exchange with a Leftist pleb such as yourself. The mean income per capita for working age individuals in the U.S. is not less than 30K. You are adding in children, the elderly, and welfare parasites because you're an ideologue with zero honesty. Those 80 million on social assistance also likely includes the elderly as well as parasitic generational welfare recipients, because again, you lack honor and you are checkmated. Pay equity will stifle innovation. Humans thrive off of competition and naturally look to their individual and familial interests over the community. Profit and the possibility of increasing quality of life motivates humans to succeed. You just want everyone to be equally miserable because it's "fair." You want to burden the naturally successful with the mass of numbers and their dead weight. That mentality will bring about the end of any order intellectually conceivable to man.
    1
  306.  @HiroshimaXl  Trump and the government lie all the time for political expediency; I can't believe I'm reminding a Leftist of that fact. Figures such as mean per capita income must be weighed on the basis of several factors. The mean per capita income of the entire population includes millions of people who don't earn a taxable income: children, elderly and disabled people, stay-at-home parents, and welfare parasites. This makes the figure inaccurate and completely useless, but useful to a Leftist ideologue trying to lie and frame capitalism as inequitable. This country is one of the finest in the world and people from socialist "utopias" wait decades to come here BECAUSE of the opportunity capitalism creates. People who support Marxism (and lie constantly to protect the flaws in their ideology) are a cancer to our nation. You are one of them.
    1
  307. The idea of Chosenness is widely agreed upon by anthropologists to be a form of ethnocentrism. I wouldn't really say that ethnocentrism is inherently supremacist, but Gad's religious tribe is certainly supremacist in other ways. The Talmud is filled with references to their superiority and divine right to dominate other groups. So I would say they are both supremacists in their own way. Islam is obviously also a supremacist doctrine in that it seeks to dominate and conquer all other groups.
    1
  308. ​ @leonslovo2932  Conquest is not a prerequisite for supremacism. For example, the Nazis are not known as supremacists because they conquered, but because they were extremely ethnocentric and thought of themselves as superior. That said, many in your group are extremely ethnocentric and do think of themselves as superior, and the reason is because that notion is reinforced in your ethno-religious dogma and embraced in your culture. You can peddle any excuse in the world, but it won't change the facts. I can and will use actual passages from the Talmud and Torah to prove the existence of ingrained supremacism in your ethno-religion. Just let me know if you want me to provide those. The best argument you could make is this: supremacism within your ethno-religion exists, but is not the norm, because your people have chosen to ignore the parts of your holy scriptures that reinforce that notion. Denying that supremacism even exists in your ethno-religion is a losing argument.
    1
  309.  @johannpopper1493  Reasonableness is subjective, of course. I would say change is often portrayed as inherently healthy and necessary by those who are not satisfied with traditional ways, even if the change has a significant potentiality of leading to something totally destructive. They take the risk anyways. But complete isolation and failure to change is indeed harmful to a population. Still, I still it's possible for a nation that is exclusive to one group to not be totally isolated and adverse to change.
    1