Comments by "No Fate But What We Make" (@SonoftheAllfather) on "Joe Rogan | Could We Create a Sport Where Women Have the Advantage Over Men? w/Adam Conover" video.

@svenNL The point though is that even if they moved the basket down, the men would dominate the women in that new environment. Lowering the basket would actually make it even easier for men to beat women. So yeah, moving the basket down would make the women's version more watchable and exciting if it were just the women playing each other, but that's kind of irrelevant to the argument this cvck is making. The sport would still not be designed for women to be better than men; men would still dominate them if the basket was lower. You can't really design a sport or athletic that less athletic people will win, as that kind of defeats the point of athletics.
1
@cdub1059 HAHAHAHA no...Adam is stupid...and wrong. Women don't have more endurance than men, especially at the high end of the spectrum. Men dominate all endurance sports. Cycling, triathlons, decathlons, marathons, you name it. Men dominate women in practically every imaginable physical contest. Whether it requires strength, power, or endurance, it doesn't matter. Men also have way more pain tolerance, especially when it comes to athletic exertion. Women are more flexible, but very rarely does being flexible alone give you an athletic advantage. The record for swimming the English channel is 30 minutes less for men than it is for women (6:55 to 7:25). Marathon record is 1:59:40.2 for men, and 2:14:04 for women, Men's 1500 meter freestyle swimming record is 14:31.02 as opposed to women's 15:20.48. Men's 5000 meter run is 12:49.60, women's 5000 meter run is 14:18.86. In 24hrs Cross-Country Skiing, a man has skied 470 km as opposed to 375 km for a woman.
1
@cdub1059 Lol okay "sTuDiEs sHoW" but all results of all endurance sport contests show that men outperform women. "LoOk iT uP"... yeah... I did. The verdict is that you're wrong. If that's "one-upping" you...ok. You're still wrong.
1
@cdub1059 Ad hominem. You're wrong. Cope more.
1
@cdub1059 The first result when entering "physical advantages of females" is from "Clearvuehealth," and is little more than a poorly constructed blogpost. It is also totally deceptive. It says "in one study, researchers found that women outperformed men in a key measure of endurance. When pushed to their physical limits, women are able to produce more their power and their maximum torque compared to men after a brief rest." What it fails to mention is that the one article they're citing to support this very generalized and poorly worded claim only studied ONE very specific type of muscular movement (plantar flexors), which are tiny little muscles in your toes!! HAHAHAHAHA So they used some totally obscure example to argue a much larger general statement, which is totally deceptive (cherry picking and inductive fallacy). That is what deniers of male physical superiority must resort to in order to make an argument: deception. The vast majority of endurance contests are not "constructed" to benefit men. A marathon goes like this: run 26.2 miles. Ready? Go. There is nothing that gives men a "constructed" advantage in the design of that event. The thing that gives us an advantage is our average physiology. The global average time for a marathon stands at around 4 hours 21 minutes – with men's average times at 4 hours 13 minutes, and women at 4 hours 42 minutes. If women have better endurance, why is this the case? The proof is in the pudding and the results speak for themselves. All physical events are dominated by males. Now do me a favor and google this : "sex differences in human physiology" and tell me what it says. :) F off with your projection. The one making excuses is you.
1
@cdub1059 Since I doubt you'll be honest enough to provide accurate findings of "sex differences in human physiology" I'll list a few: ON AVERAGE, men have: *longer, thicker, stronger, denser bones. *stronger, thicker, denser connective tissue. *stronger, more massive and denser, muscles. *higher caloric conversion rates to muscle. *higher muscle-mass to body-mass ratio. *lower body fat percentage. *significantly higher hand-grip strength. *greater lung volume per body mass *greater oxygen-carrying capacity in the blood. *more blood cells per cubic millimeter of blood. *higher peripheral pain tolerance. *higher inter-hemispheric brain connectivity (motor skills). *higher testosterone, which is an anabolic steroid that aids in recovery. Athletic contests aren't artificially "constructed" to make men superior. Men are biologically constructed to be athletically superior. People like yourself are just butthurt about reality and in denial for ideological purposes.
1
@cdub1059 I did that and posted what I found in the very first result: deceptive faulty generalizations.
1
@cdub1059 No, actually that is just more projection on your part. The vast scientific consensus supports my argument. In other words, you are the one who needs to cherry pick information and use deception to make an argument. Stop embarrassing yourself. You are wrong and so is the beta Nu-male Adam.
1
@cdub1059 My little brain? Hahaha and there you have it...that's what it always boils down to with ideologues like you. You spew your lies until you're proven wrong. Then you personally attack. Then you lie some more. You originally said "Adam is right" (he argued that male athletic superiority was basically socially constructed and not naturally occurring). You then said females have greater endurance and pain tolerance than men. All of the claims you made are objectively, provable false, and I have the consensus of scientific research (based on quantitative data observation) and the RESULTS of all endurance contests in the history of sports to support of my position. All you have is cherry picked, totally disingenuous, ideologically motivated lies. Read THIS again until your pea brain can comprehend.
1
@cdub1059 What studies are you even talking about? Provide them. Name them. You can't. The study I am referring to was the first citation used in the article that was the very first result in the search you requested. It was cited in after it made a general statement saying women have greater endurance than men. But the academic study only made the claim that women had greater "fatigability" in the small muscles in the toes. Liars always project and blame everyone else when they get exposed. Everyone is just too stupid to understand you, right? It's not that you're a liar or completely wrong. It's that you're just misunderstood and we're stupid. Lol gtfoh. You said women could swim further through cold water. You said they have greater endurance and pain tolerance. You're wrong. Men have routinely dominated the English channel swim. Why is that? I thought women had greater endurance and pain tolerance?
1
@cdub1059 House chores? Are you effing serious? Ever notice how the house chores that require motor skill, endurance and physical strength are done by the man? Lol gtfoh. Stop embarrassing yourself.
1
@cdub1059 Simply being alive is not a sport, you moron. Wtf are you even talking about? Lol you've completely pivoted. First you claimed women have more endurance and pain tolerance and could swim longer in cold water. Now you're saying they simply live longer on average and are able to do house chores for longer without losing their mind, and those things somehow constitute a physical advantage. May I remind you that the original argument was about athletics? Lol you're grasping at straws.
1
@cdub1059 Your argument has now devolved into semantics. "dEfiNe a sPoRt!" Reeee. Playing a video game is not a sport. Sport requires physical exertion, which is why men have a physiological advantage. We cannot create something that requires physical exertion where women have an advantage over men. Playing video games, washing dishes, and being alive is not sport. You are absolutely embarrassing yourself.
1