Comments by "K `" (@user-jt3dw6vv4x) on "Former communist rebel leader Prachanda becomes Nepal’s new prime minister" video.

@adventurehunt6080 Are you trying to tell me that most Nepalese are not Asians??? 💀💀If you really want to go down that route, true "Asian" natives of Nepal are the small tribal groups of Nepal (specifically the Kusunda, Uraon, Munda and Santhal). Why do I say that because they're some of the first people to be living in Himalayas/South Asia, everybody else came later.
4
@adventurehunt6080 What is "indigenous"? If you want to talk about indigeneity, I already told you before that there are four groups in Nepal that are the real "indigenous" people. So what is this "indigenous" people you speak of? Don't say "indigenous" and think you're making a point.
3
@adventurehunt6080 You don't even know who I am. 15% of "Indo-European" Nepalese?? What on earth are you talking about??? Indo-European is a language family. What is "indigenous Nepalese"? Answer that instead of rambling.
3
@adventurehunt6080 You say 85% of Nepalese are "indigenous", who are they? Who is "Asian"? Everybody who is native to Asia is Asian. Are you going to tell me Kashmiri or something is not Asian? Are they "European" to you?
3
@adventurehunt6080 That's false! The first people in Asia were the deep ancestral Basal Asian populations who were all dark skinned people. Kusunda, Munda, Santhal, AASI, Hoabinhian, Andamanese etc. are all dark brown skinned people not light skinned Mongol people. The light skinned East Asian looking people that emerged later developed from these dark skinned Basal Asian populations and are part of the ESEA lineage. Go read Melinda A. Yang's genetic papers on the genetic history of Asia and learn something. 1. A genetic history of migration, diversification, and admixture in Asia - Melinda A. Yang, 2022
3
@adventurehunt6080 Leave the study and documentation of genetic history of Asian people to the advanced nations of East Asia and Singapore (even India and Thailand), not Nepal. Focus first on developing your country instead of believing in these fake ideologies, stop hanging off the coat tails of more successful Asian nations because you can't be proud of your own heritage. BTW, Indo-European languages emerged in Central Asia. Last time I checked Central Asia is in Asia.
3
@adventurehunt6080 Final comment part 1, the first inhabitants of all of Asia from India, Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, Cambodia, Vietnam and NEPAL were all dark skinned people like Kusunda, AASI, Andamanese, Hoabinhian etc. They are the predecessors to the modern people that now live across Asia.
3
@adventurehunt6080 The Indo-European-speaking people and Tibeto-Burman people that settled in Nepal came later and intermixed with the native brown skinned people of the land. Indo-European is from Central ASIA. Can't you see "Indo" in the name? It is Eurasian. Source: Genetic Connections and Convergent Evolution of Tropical Indigenous Peoples in Asia - Lian Deng, Yuwen Pan et al. 2021
3
@adventurehunt6080 What?
2
@adventurehunt6080 I'm not Nepalese. You don't even know who I am. 15% of "Indo-European" Nepalese?? What are you talking about? Indo-European is a language family. Who are these people you speak of that you consider to be non-indigenous? Give me a name. What is "indigenous Nepalese"? Answer that instead of rambling. You say 85% of Nepalese are "indigenous", who are they? Who is "Asian"? Everybody who is native to Asia is Asian. Are you going to tell me Kashmiri or something is not Asian? Are they "European" to you? Nepal is an extremely weak and highly undeveloped nation in Asia that relies on so much aid, calm down and humble yourself. 💀
2
This is South China Morning Post, not CGTN
2