Comments by "K `" (@user-jt3dw6vv4x) on "Europe’s Problem With The Roma" video.

@ReasonAboveEverything You have got to be living in a different timeline if you think Romani people are "South Indian" or anything like that. Firstly, haplogroups only constitute a very small aspect of human DNA and is nowhere near as significant as something like autosomal DNA. Secondly, Romani people intermixed in the areas that travelled across including the Middle East and Europe. Finally, Europeans are not "Aryan" in any shape or form. The term "Aryan" is a non-racial term used by the ancient Indo-Iranian speaking tribes that settled in North India and Iran. The term "Aryan" was never ever used by Europeans. Hitler co-opted the term.
16
@chiefpotleaf2338 India is completely different. Modern Indians were formed from three broad genetic components. The first: AASI which is closely related to the modern Irula, Paniya and Soliga people and distantly related to the Andamanese, East Asians and Australian Aboriginals. The AASI (Ancient Ancestral South Indians) are native to South Asia. The second: West Eurasian-related Neolithic Iranian farmers who mixed with the AASI and formed the Indus Valley Civilisation (IVC) and eventually formed the Ancestral South Indians (ASI) and the West Eurasian Steppe people who mixed with the ASI. The third: East Eurasian Austro-Asiatic and Tibeto-Burman speakers from Southeast Asia and Tibet, found at the highest frequency in parts of north, east and northeast India and found at lower frequencies across the rest of South Asia. All three of these components mixed together to create Indians.
6
@k.k.c8670 Indo-Aryans are a subset and culture that emerged in India that developed from the West Eurasian Indo-Iranian-speaking Steppe people that settled in North India and Iran from Central Asia. "Indo-Aryan" is not a term to describe all Indo-European speakers and is a modern term used in South Asia to describe people who speak Indo-Aryan languages of the Indo-European language family. That term has nothing to do with Europeans. Europeans are the descendants of three broad lineages: West European hunter-gatherers, Early European Farmers and Ancient North Eurasians. The Ancient North Eurasians are associated with the Bell Beaker culture and the expansion of Indo-European languages (Corded Ware culture), which occurred during the Bronze Age.
6
@chiefpotleaf2338 Sources: 1. The Formation of Human Populations in South and Central Asia - 2019 2. Ancestry-Specific Analyses Reveal Differential Demographic Histories and Opposite Selective Pressures in Modern South Asian Populations - 2019 3. A genetic history of migration, diversification, and admixture in Asia Melinda A. Yang - 2022 4. The Role of Recent Admixture in Forming the Contemporary West Eurasian Genomic Landscape - 2015 5. Genomic structure in Europeans dating back at least 36,200 years - 2014 6. Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans - 2018
5
@k.k.c8670 Sources: 1. The evolutionary history of human populations in Europe, Iosif Lazaridis - 2018 2. The Role of Recent Admixture in Forming the Contemporary West Eurasian Genomic Landscape - 2015 3. Genomic structure in Europeans dating back at least 36,200 years - 2014 4. Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans - 2018
5
@chiefpotleaf2338 Sources: 1. The evolutionary history of human populations in Europe, Iosif Lazaridis - 2018 2. The Role of Recent Admixture in Forming the Contemporary West Eurasian Genomic Landscape - 2015 3. Genomic structure in Europeans dating back at least 36,200 years - 2014 4. Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans - 2018
5
@chiefpotleaf2338 Y-DNA and mtDNA only form a small portion of human DNA. Political purposes? No. This has nothing to do with politics. Y-DNA is absolutely not the most important aspect here. Y-DNA is only found in males and you're telling me it's the most important? A female can't take a Y-DNA test. Europeans are NOT Aryan. Aryan is a term that means "noble" and was never used by Europeans so Europeans should not be claiming something that has literally nothing to do with them. Indo-European is a language family. No, Indo-European speakers did not invade India. Gosh, even after the landmark and largest genetic study conducted on South Asia has been published you still have people thinking it was an invasion. South Asia was settled by so many different groups that mixed together. Dravidians aren't even a race, it's a language family. You need to learn about West Eurasian and East Eurasian DNA.
4
@chiefpotleaf2338 Europeans and Middle Easterners are of the same genetic stock, they are both basal West Eurasian populations. This obsession with wanting to associate with India has got to end when the genetic cousins of Europeans are the Middle Easterners both genetically and culturally. This is why Europeans all carry trace ancestry from the Middle East. They are both basal West Eurasian populations.
4
@chiefpotleaf2338 Europeans are the descendants of three broad lineages: West European hunter-gatherers, Early European Farmers and Ancient North Eurasians. The Ancient North Eurasians are associated with the Bell Beaker culture and the expansion of Indo-European languages (Corded Ware culture), which occurred during the Bronze Age.
4
@k.k.c8670 We're both on the same page. I am referring to the Cell and Science papers too. Yeah it was a migration.
2