Youtube comments of K ` (@user-jt3dw6vv4x).

  1. 1200
  2. 892
  3. 740
  4. 328
  5. Buddhism, Hinduism and other Eastern religions are deeply intertwined. The prevalence of Hindu-derived deity worship in various parts of Buddhist Asia is because of the Hindu influence. Phra Phrom (Thai depiction of Brahma) as featured in the video at 10:52 cannot be tied to Buddhism but more broadly to the general Dharmic/Indic culture that exists in Thailand. Thai people also popularly worship Ganesha, a deity that does not exist in Buddhist cosmology and Thai people also visit Hindu temples in Thailand. Some of the largest Ganesha statues outside of India are located in Thailand. Phra Phrom in Thai-style is also worshipped by ethnic Chinese across Southeast Asia and southern China. In Hong Kong, there is a famous Phra Phrom statue that is frequented by Chinese people. In Japan, there are Japanese versions of Ganesha, Shiva and Skanda and in Sri Lanka, you will find Buddhist people worshipping local folk gods as well as Hindu gods inside some Buddhist temples like Seema Malaka. The same thing applies to other Buddhist groups in Asia. So correlating it to Buddhism is incorrect because some of these devas don't even exist in Buddhism. The reason people worship them in Asia is because of the pre-existing Hindu influence and the general overlap that Eastern religions share with one another. Thailand was previously a Hindu nation, these Hindu practices were simply carried over after Theravada Buddhism was brought to the country from Sri Lanka. There is no restriction to how people must practice Buddhism, Hinduism, Taoism, Shintoism etc. so people mix them together.
    301
  6. 300
  7. 295
  8. 214
  9. 176
  10. 169
  11. 160
  12. 158
  13. 145
  14. 137
  15. 127
  16. 115
  17. 112
  18. 107
  19. 104
  20. 101
  21. 96
  22. 93
  23. 85
  24. 81
  25. 73
  26. 73
  27. 72
  28. 68
  29. 66
  30. 64
  31. 63
  32. 61
  33. 54
  34. 53
  35. 52
  36. 52
  37. 52
  38. 50
  39. 50
  40. The case of Sri Lanka is quite peculiar because this is a country that had everything going for it. This country could have harnessed what it had in the 1940s, 1950s and 1960s but decided to go down the route of ethnic disharmony and violence. The leaders of yesteryear were more interested in fuelling their egos and righting the wrongs of the past instead of moving on. Despite the end of the war in 2009 and the hallmarks of a new economic miracle, the situation did not improve because the country was fractured along ethnic lines and there was no effort to create some sort of peace and acknowledgement of the past. With high economic growth rates of 9% in the early 2010s, Sri Lanka eventually peaked as an upper middle income nation in 2019. Sri Lankans, at one point, enjoyed a per capita national income that was higher than all other South Asian countries except for the Maldives, along with a longer life expectancy as a result of strong social services such as healthcare and education. Sri Lankans began living longer and longer to the point that the country has now become one of the fastest aging societies in the world and began to recruit migrant workers from India, Bangladesh, Nepal and Myanmar to combat its shrinking workforce (problems that high income nations face, not developing ones but it's a testament to Sri Lanka's successful efforts in boosting the quality of life for its people). Sri Lanka's last beacon of success was in 2020 when the country was successfully able to control COVID-19 by pursuing a Zero COVID policy using contact tracing and harnessing its good healthcare system bringing cases down to 0. It performed so well that it was ranked #10 in the world among countries that were most successful in controlling the spread of COVID-19 by the Lowy Institute. What we see now is the beginning of civilisational collapse. All civilisations peak and decline. What a shame to see everything they achieved and what they could have achieved go down the drain. You will never get far if you continue to divide and conquer people. Sri Lanka now pays the price for everything wrong that its leaders, past and present, did to the country and its people.
    49
  41. 48
  42. 46
  43. 43
  44. 43
  45. 43
  46. 43
  47. 43
  48. 42
  49. 42
  50. 41
  51. 41
  52. 41
  53. 41
  54. 40
  55. 38
  56. 37
  57. 37
  58. 35
  59. 33
  60. 33
  61. 32
  62. 32
  63. 32
  64. 32
  65. 31
  66. 31
  67. 31
  68. 31
  69. 29
  70. 29
  71. 29
  72. 29
  73. 28
  74. 28
  75. 27
  76. 26
  77. 26
  78. 26
  79. 26
  80. 26
  81. 26
  82. 26
  83. 25
  84. 25
  85. 25
  86. 25
  87. 24
  88. 24
  89. 24
  90. 23
  91. 23
  92. 23
  93. 23
  94. 23
  95. 23
  96. 23
  97. 23
  98. 23
  99. 22
  100. 22
  101. 22
  102. 21
  103. 21
  104. 21
  105. 21
  106. 21
  107. 21
  108. 21
  109. 20
  110. 20
  111. 20
  112. 20
  113. 20
  114. 20
  115. 20
  116. 20
  117. 20
  118. 20
  119. 20
  120. 19
  121. 19
  122. 19
  123. 19
  124. 19
  125. 19
  126. 19
  127. 19
  128. 19
  129. 19
  130. 19
  131. 18
  132. 18
  133. 18
  134. 18
  135. 18
  136. 18
  137. 18
  138. 17
  139. 17
  140. 17
  141. 17
  142. 17
  143. 17
  144. 17
  145. 17
  146. 16
  147. 16
  148. 16
  149. 16
  150. 16
  151. 16
  152. 16
  153. 16
  154. 16
  155. 16
  156. 16
  157. 16
  158. 16
  159. 15
  160. 15
  161. 15
  162. 15
  163. 15
  164. 15
  165. 15
  166. 15
  167. 15
  168. 15
  169. 15
  170. 15
  171. 14
  172. 14
  173. 14
  174. 14
  175. 14
  176. 14
  177. 14
  178. 14
  179. 14
  180. 14
  181. 14
  182. 14
  183. 14
  184. 14
  185. 14
  186. 14
  187. 14
  188. 14
  189. 14
  190. 14
  191. 14
  192. 14
  193. 13
  194. 13
  195. 13
  196. 13
  197. 13
  198. 13
  199. 13
  200. 13
  201. 13
  202. 13
  203. 13
  204. 13
  205. 13
  206. 13
  207. 13
  208. 13
  209. 13
  210. 13
  211. 13
  212. 13
  213. 13
  214. 13
  215. 13
  216. 13
  217. 12
  218. 12
  219. 12
  220. 12
  221. 12
  222. 12
  223. 12
  224. 12
  225. 12
  226. 12
  227. 12
  228. 12
  229. 12
  230. 12
  231. 12
  232. 12
  233. 12
  234. 12
  235. 12
  236. 12
  237. 12
  238. 12
  239. 11
  240. 11
  241. 11
  242. 11
  243. 11
  244. 11
  245. This situation has arisen primarily in the US where there is a need to categorise people based on appearance as a result of the country's history fraught with poor race relations. In the US, "Asian" means East Asian and so other Asians who don't fit that image are excuded. This definition also exists in many other Western countries such as Australia and Canada. However, there is much greater awareness that despite looking physically different, Indians and other South Asians are still "Asian" just not the type of "Asian" people immediately think of. In the UK, it's the complete opposite where South Asians are seen as the default Asian. For South Asians, however, we are aware of the sheer diversity of our community. I am of ethnic Sri Lankan descent and anybody aware of Sri Lanka's diversity will know there are a variety of ethnic groups (Sinhalese, Tamil, Moor, Malay, Eurasian, Vedda, Chinese etc.) on the island. For other people of Sri Lankan descent, they know I am Sri Lankan but for many non-Sri Lankans or non-Asians there is a struggle in understanding certain characteristics of my appearance. I have epicanthic folds (or as understood in a Sri Lankan context, "Malay eyes" or what some may call "almond eyes"). As a result, I have had people assume I belong to other groups are mixed with Southeast Asian groups. People think that almond eyes or East Asian features only exist in East Asia or Southeast Asia but that's not the case. On "South Asian TikTok", I see South Asians who look stereotypically "South Asian", East Asian, Southeast Asian and West Asian. Our features are so diverse. The idea one is "Asian" based on how they look like doesn't make sense to me and it doesn't make sense to my Southeast Asian friends either. I have Southeast Asian friends who are diverse. One of my SEA friends could be mistaken for "Indian" and I knew a Timorese girl who had dark brown skin and round eyes. A Thai girl on Quora went viral on the platform for encapsulating SEA diversity in one sentence, "There is no other place in the world where you will find Chinese-looking people using their right hand to eat rice or Indian-looking people eating noodles with chopsticks". Asia is a diverse place. The concept of "Asian" is simply about geography and that is how it is understood in Asia. The reason why "Asian" becomes a term to describe appearance outside of Asia is because Asian ethnic groups are minorities. It's a trivial issue to focus on.
    11
  246. 11
  247. 11
  248. 11
  249. 11
  250. 11
  251. 11
  252. 11
  253. 11
  254. 11
  255. 11
  256. 11
  257. 11
  258. 11
  259. 11
  260. 11
  261. 11
  262. 11
  263. 11
  264. 11
  265. 11
  266. 11
  267. 11
  268. 11
  269. 10
  270. 10
  271. 10
  272. 10
  273. 10
  274. 10
  275. 10
  276. 10
  277. 10
  278. 10
  279. 10
  280. 10
  281. 10
  282. 10
  283. 10
  284. 10
  285. 10
  286. 10
  287. 10
  288. 10
  289. 10
  290. 10
  291. 10
  292. 10
  293. 10
  294. 10
  295.  @sportsunplugged009  No, I'm born and raised in Australia. You just hate the fact that people who are not Pakistani are criticising India. You are here claiming the whole of South Asia + Tibet + Myanmar belongs to India, which is wrong. So keep saying that but it's not true. I know you hate this fact but many people in Australia care about the instability and threats from India. Why? We are part of the Asia-Pacific. Hugh White wrote a whole book about how we should acknowledge that India could be a future threat to us (and I agree with him) and Modern Diplomacy published articles on India's desire to swallow up large parts of Asia. Internationally people respect China more than India, despite the threats coming out of China. I see so many people say negative things about India on a regular basis across YouTube, TikTok and Twitter ranging from predatory men to scammers to colorism and racism. It has such a bad reputation. I just know when India's population exceeds China's by April, there is going to be a lot of xenophobia and racism across social media. Be ready for it. ...and you don't need to worry about Pakistan. People don't care because of how problematic it is. That country is responsible for terrorism, harbouring Osama Bin Laden while pretending to support the West in fighting terrorism, creating the Taliban, lynching people who don't believe in their religion, grooming gangs in the UK and a multitude of other negative things. I still don't know why the US is so close to that country after all the things they have done.
    10
  296. 10
  297. 10
  298. 10
  299. 9
  300. 9
  301. 9
  302. 9
  303. 9
  304. 9
  305. 9
  306. 9
  307. 9
  308. 9
  309. 9
  310. 9
  311. 9
  312. 9
  313. 9
  314. 9
  315. 9
  316. 9
  317. 9
  318. 9
  319. 9
  320.  @elangbam3115  Maybe cool it with the bitterness. They didn't cast him for views from India. They cast him because they needed someone to play a Pakistani migrant worker. You need to understand that South and Southeast Asian migrant workers have been living in Korea since the early 1990s and since the early 2000s, most of them now learn how to speak Korean. So this has nothing to do with Indians (who are a much smaller minority compared to other South Asians in Korea) or who is more familiar or integrated. This is not about how many Southeast Asians or Indians or whoever is in Korea, it's about the role. It's also not about representation. Just because there are more Southeast Asians in Korea than Indians doesn't mean they need to cast Southeast Asians. The show needed an actor to play a Pakistani migrant worker and so they cast him because he fit the role. Please understand the situation of South and Southeast Asian migrant workers in Korea. FYI, a Filipino actor auditioned for the role of Ali but he ended up playing the role of a Southeast Asian migrant worker that Ali befriends in episode 4. Also, they don't cast people solely because of ethnicity. You need to be talented and know how to act. Anupam knows how to act and speak Korean so he was cast as Ali because he was the most fitting person to play the role. You should go listen to what the director of Squid Game said about why he was cast. When there are successful Southeast Asian actors, they will be cast too. Stop pitting two groups against each other when Ali represents the experience that all South Asian and Southeast Asian migrant workers face in Korea.
    9
  321. 9
  322. 9
  323. 9
  324. 9
  325. 9
  326. 9
  327. 9
  328. 9
  329. 9
  330. 9
  331. 9
  332. 9
  333. 9
  334. 9
  335. 9
  336. 9
  337.  @gatorcroco4904  The only Burmese people saying that are people who despise them. I haven't seen a single Bangladeshi online say they're from Bangladesh. Bangladesh wasn't even a country until 1971. It's not after a couple of generations. The Rohingyas sided with the British during the Japanese invasion of Myanmar in WW2 under the belief that they would be given their own nation by the British. The Bamar and Rakhine were appalled and saw the Rohingyas as traitors. Min Aung Hlaing, the general of the Tatmadaw infamously said that the genocide or what he termed the "clearance operation" was "finishing what was started in WW2". Long before that, the Tatmadaw had stripped the Rohingyas off their citizenship in the 1970s and got rid of all Rohingya politicians in the Burmese government. The Tatmadaw peddled misinformation that the Rohingyas were from Bangladesh as a result of their history in WW2 and that the only indigenous Muslim group in Rakhine State are the Kaman. Myanmar until 2011 was the North Korea of Southeast Asia. Nobody knew what was actually going on and even after 2011, the Tatmadaw still had tight control on the country's media and internet. This is why the Rohingya survivors sued Facebook in the 2010s for all of the misinformation that was spread on the platform during h genocide after the platform entered Myanmar without a Burmese language department. Bangladesh provided refuge for the Rohingyas because Bangladesh is the closest nation to Rakhine State in Myanmar.
    9
  338. 9
  339. 9
  340. 9
  341. 9
  342. 9
  343. 9
  344. 9
  345. 9
  346. 9
  347. 9
  348. 8
  349. 8
  350. 8
  351. 8
  352. 8
  353. 8
  354. 8
  355. 8
  356. 8
  357. 8
  358. 8
  359. 8
  360. 8
  361. 8
  362. 8
  363. 8
  364. 8
  365. 8
  366. 8
  367.  @AegonTargaryen300  That is unless they solve their border disputes. It seemed impossible until Russia invaded Ukraine earlier this year. For the first time, mainstream Chinese and Indian media and people were espousing the same views and Chinese state media for the first time took a softer approach on India, supporting and defending the position of India in the war. If this war continues to polarise the Global North and Global South, then I wouldn't be surprised if a partnership of some sort emerged between the two. Many proponents in China and India acknowledge the historical co-existence and deep cultural exchange between the two nations until the colonisation of Asia and always highlight the fact that the division between the two is the result of borders drawn up by British rulers. What many don't realise is that China and India will always look after the interests of the Global South regardless of their political positions. This is why China and India were strong proponents of waiving vaccine IP in 2021 so they could both produce vaccines that could be sent to the developing world free of charge, whereas the Global North refused. If the war continues and China continues to find apertures in India's relationship with the West, then it shouldn't be a surprise to see the Chinese government bolster its pro-Asian rhetoric (which is heavy on the idea that the US is a threat to stability in Asia) when communicating with India which it has been doing in the rest of Asia since the 2010s.
    8
  368. 8
  369. 8
  370. 8
  371. 8
  372. 8
  373. 8
  374. 8
  375. 8
  376. 8
  377. 8
  378. 8
  379. 8
  380. 8
  381. 8
  382. 8
  383. 8
  384. 8
  385. 8
  386. 8
  387. 8
  388. 8
  389. 8
  390. 8
  391. 8
  392. 8
  393. 8
  394. 8
  395. 8
  396. 8
  397. 8
  398. 8
  399. 8
  400. 8
  401. 8
  402. 8
  403. 8
  404. 8
  405. 8
  406. 8
  407. 8
  408. 8
  409. 8
  410. 8
  411. 7
  412. 7
  413. 7
  414. 7
  415. 7
  416. 7
  417. 7
  418. 7
  419. 7
  420. 7
  421. 7
  422. 7
  423. 7
  424. 7
  425. 7
  426. 7
  427. 7
  428. 7
  429. 7
  430. 7
  431. 7
  432. 7
  433. 7
  434. 7
  435. 7
  436. 7
  437. 7
  438. 7
  439. 7
  440. 7
  441. 7
  442. 7
  443. 7
  444. 7
  445. 7
  446. 7
  447. 7
  448. 7
  449. 7
  450. 7
  451. 7
  452. 7
  453. 7
  454. 7
  455. 7
  456. 7
  457. 7
  458. 7
  459. 7
  460. 7
  461. 7
  462. 7
  463. 7
  464. 7
  465. 7
  466. 7
  467. 7
  468. 7
  469. 7
  470. 7
  471. 7
  472. 7
  473. 7
  474. 7
  475. 7
  476. 7
  477. 7
  478. 7
  479. 7
  480. 7
  481. 6
  482. 6
  483. 6
  484. 6
  485. 6
  486. 6
  487. 6
  488. 6
  489. 6
  490. 6
  491. 6
  492. 6
  493. 6
  494. 6
  495. 6
  496. 6
  497. 6
  498. 6
  499. 6
  500. 6
  501. 6
  502. 6
  503. 6
  504. 6
  505. 6
  506. 6
  507. 6
  508. 6
  509. 6
  510.  @Tounguepunchfartbox  Yeah but that's the thing. The US is not a local player and that's what makes everybody in the Asian and Pacific region wary of the US. The Trump presidency really sped up China's expansion in the region during the late 2010s. While Trump refused to attend any of the major Asia-Pacific summits, China was able to convince countries in the region that the US is no longer reliable and that they can be relied upon. Additionally, China has promoted the idea that "Asia must be controlled by Asians" and recent evidence has shown that this mentality has begun to creep into the minds of average citizens in other Asian countries like Singapore. Then in 2021, the US left Afghanistan under Biden and it further convinced people here that the US can't be relied upon. Vietnam and Afghanistan are consistently brought up about how the US is a failure when it comes to Asian affairs. Then this year, Russia invaded Ukraine and while the US has its own reasons to not get directly involved, it further convinced people that the US can't be relied on. Taiwan is quite fearful because they fear that the US and its allies won't be there if China invades the island. In the end, Asia has everything to lose. Asia-Pacific will be the first to suffer. The US will not lose anything because they aren't part of the region. This is why a lot of countries in the region want to balance China and the US, they despise having to pick sides and would prefer if Asia-Pacific can become multipolar instead of unipolar. Nobody wants to become a pawn between China and the US.
    6
  511. 6
  512. 6
  513. 6
  514. 6
  515. 6
  516. 6
  517. 6
  518. 6
  519. 6
  520. 6
  521. 6
  522. 6
  523. 6
  524. 6
  525. 6
  526. 6
  527. 6
  528. 6
  529. 6
  530. 6
  531. 6
  532. 6
  533. 6
  534. 6
  535. 6
  536. 6
  537. 6
  538. 6
  539. 6
  540. 6
  541. 6
  542. 6
  543. 6
  544. 6
  545. 6
  546. 6
  547. 6
  548. 6
  549. 6
  550. 6
  551. 6
  552. 6
  553. 6
  554. 6
  555. 6
  556. 6
  557. 6
  558. 6
  559. 6
  560. 6
  561. 6
  562. 6
  563. 6
  564. 6
  565. 6
  566. 6
  567. 6
  568. 6
  569. 6
  570. 6
  571. 6
  572. 6
  573. 6
  574. 6
  575. 6
  576. 6
  577. 6
  578. 6
  579. 6
  580. 6
  581. 6
  582. I think your comment brings up an interesting point. You gave a description of your experiences with all of the men you have dated and the one thing that stood out to me was culture. Now culture can mean a lot of things but there is a difference between culture of your own ethnic group to culture of your nation. I'm assuming you're a born and raised American and and I would say that you're going to fit in better within an American context rather than a non-American context. Why? It's because you're from the US. While there will always be nuances as you described with the White guy, Chinese guy and Black guy, the one thing you have in common is that you're culturally American despite coming from different ethnic and ancestral cultural backgrounds. As soon as you said you said that the Indian guy was an international student, it was clear. The cultural similarities Indians and Southeast Asians share is one thing that you said you both connected to but you also said your cultures were very different and I think it's safe to say that he would have come from a more traditional Indian background (as represented in India) and that your cultural background of being an American of Southeast Asian heritage was what made it also feel so different. "Race", ethnicity, genetics is one thing but I believe culture is what is going to play the biggest role. There are cases of cross cultural mixing in multiracial nations like Singapore and Malaysia where people of ethnic Indian descent have been raised in Chinese culture and thus are culturally Chinese and vice versa Chinese people raised in Indian culture who are culturally Indian. If we take it a step further there are cases of Indians from India in Singapore who are seen as so culturally different to the local Singaporean Indians despite both groups being ethnically Indian. So I think culture plays a big role, aka the environment you grew up in.
    6
  583. 6
  584. 6
  585. 6
  586. 6
  587. 1. "Asian" means "East Asian" in colloquial US English but that's definitely not how it's used elsewhere in the world. 2. India had a huge impact culturally on the rest of Asia. Hu Shih famously spoke about the cultural influence on China and most of South and Southeast Asia is part of the Indian Cultural Sphere. So I don't know why you think India is culturally detached from the rest of Asia when it's one of the main ancient cultural powers in the region alongside China. The root of the dominant East, South and Southeast Asian cultures traces back to India and China. 3. South Asian women (specifically Tamil and Ceylonese/Sri Lankan women) have been stereotyped as submissive throughout history. Saint Jack (1970s film) focused on the ethnic stereotypes that existed for Singaporean (Chinese, Malay and Tamil) women as well as other Asian women (specifically Ceylonese) during the era of R&R in Singapore at the time of the Vietnam War. There is a prominent scene in the film where the main character describes the different tastes Western men (German, British, American, Australian) have for Asian women and he said that the Germans came to Singapore for the Tamils and the Australians for the Chinese. Also, there was an old era Indian actress that used to be described as a dragon lady. Focus has often been placed on the stereotypes of East Asian women but these stereotypes also exist for other Asian women too. The thing is most South Asians outside of Asia are of North Indian origin and thus are not within this discussion due to their culture of not marrying non-Indians. So people mistakenly think that this has nothing to do with South Asians because they aren't aware of the stereotypes that have been placed on the women that originate from the southern parts of South Asia (who are culturally, ethnically and physically different to those from the north).
    6
  588. 5
  589. 5
  590. 5
  591. 5
  592. 5
  593. 5
  594. 5
  595. 5
  596. 5
  597. 5
  598. 5
  599. 5
  600. 5
  601. 5
  602. 5
  603. 5
  604. 5
  605. 5
  606. 5
  607. 5
  608. 5
  609. 5
  610. 5
  611. 5
  612. 5
  613. 5
  614. 5
  615. 5
  616. 5
  617. 5
  618. 5
  619. 5
  620. 5
  621. 5
  622. 5
  623. 5
  624. 5
  625. 5
  626. 5
  627. 5
  628. 5
  629. 5
  630. 5
  631. 5
  632. 5
  633. 5
  634. 5
  635. 5
  636. 5
  637. 5
  638. 5
  639. 5
  640. 5
  641. 5
  642. 5
  643. 5
  644. 5
  645. 5
  646. 5
  647. 5
  648. 5
  649. 5
  650. 5
  651. 5
  652. 5
  653. 5
  654. 5
  655. 5
  656. 5
  657. 5
  658. 5
  659. 5
  660. 5
  661. 5
  662. 5
  663. 5
  664. 5
  665. 5
  666. 5
  667. 5
  668. 5
  669. 5
  670. 5
  671. 5
  672. 5
  673. 5
  674. 5
  675. 5
  676. 5
  677. 5
  678. 5
  679. 5
  680. 5
  681.  @kookoo9235  It's literally right wing populism though. The Rohingya genocide and other forms of violence towards ethnic minorities in Myanmar is the result of Bamar nationalism that supports the traditional idea of Bamar hegemony over Myanmar and this idea that Bamar identity must be protected. Bamar nationalism shares ties with other right wing nationalist movements in Asia like in Sri Lanka and Thailand. They also believe Asian Buddhists face an existential crisis because the fertility rates of Buddhist women across Asia are very low (particularly in Japan, South Korea, China, Thailand, Sri Lanka, Bhutan and Vietnam) and data shows that Buddhists will be the only major religious group to not grow in absolute numbers over the next couple of decades. Their anger is directed towards Islam because Muslim women have a much higher fertility rate and historically speaking, large parts of South and Southeast Asia that were once followers of Buddhism are now Muslim-majority, coupled with the way Islam was introduced into South Asia, it's generated anger among right wing nationalists in different parts of the region. Their ethnic and cultural identity is tied with Buddhism. Buddhism is a part of their cultural heritage, they may not even understand the basic teachings of the Buddha but still identify as "Buddhist". So when they see their low fertility rates, they fear that they will go extinct. Their anger and violence comes from a place of ethnonationalism and the desire to maintain control. It all stems from right wing beliefs that contrast with the Bamar Buddhists who want to make Myanmar a country for all Burmese people, not just Bamar.
    5
  682. 5
  683. 5
  684. 5
  685. 5
  686. 5
  687. 5
  688. 5
  689. 5
  690. 5
  691. 5
  692. 5
  693. 5
  694. 5
  695. 5
  696. 5
  697. 5
  698. 5
  699. 5
  700. 5
  701. 5
  702. 5
  703. 5
  704. 5
  705. 5
  706. 5
  707. 5
  708. 5
  709. 5
  710. 5
  711. 5
  712. 5
  713. 5
  714. 5
  715. 5
  716. 5
  717. 5
  718. 5
  719.  @silentkiller421  Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew expressed regret at what happened to Sri Lanka for decades. He spoke about how the Sinhalese nationalism disenfranchised the most educated ethnic group in the country who are the Sri Lankan Tamils and expressed anger at what Mahinda Rajapaksa had done to ruin the country's trajectory. You're trying to find a reason as to why Sri Lanka failed and link it to other South Asian countries but what's happening in mainland South Asia has nothing to do with what happened in Sri Lanka. For Sri Lanka, they were colonised and the Sinhalese felt they were disenfranchised by the colonial policies that favoured the Tamils. So they wanted to right the wrongs of the past and in that process they destroyed their country by favouring the Sinhalese over everybody else. Lee Kuan Yew was very fond of the Singaporean Sri Lankan (Ceylonese) Tamil community. One of the founding political fathers of Singapore and close friends of Lee Kuan Yew of Singapore was a Sri Lankan Tamil. Lee was very vocal about the fact that Sri Lanka's disenfranchisement of the Sri Lankan Tamils was part of the reason why the country failed. The reality is that the Sri Lankan Tamils were more educated and stereotypically speaking, in Sri Lanka, people view the Sri Lankan Tamils as more intelligent. When you look at Singapore, there has long been a history of Sri Lankan Tamils in Singaporean politics and other sectors. Lee famously spoke about how despite being a small minority in Singapore their contribution to the development of Singapore has been paramount. What Lee believed was that had Sri Lankan Tamils still had influence in the nation, the country would've been in a better place and it's true. Tamils make up almost 1/4 of the population, you can't get anywhere by alienating 21% of your nation's people.
    5
  720. 5
  721. 5
  722. 5
  723. 5
  724. 5
  725. 5
  726. 5
  727. 5
  728. 5
  729. 5
  730. 5
  731. 5
  732. 5
  733. 5
  734. 5
  735. 5
  736. 5
  737. 5
  738. 5
  739. 5
  740. 5
  741. 5
  742. 5
  743. 5
  744. 5
  745. 5
  746. 5
  747. 5
  748. 5
  749. 5
  750. 5
  751. 4
  752. 4
  753. 4
  754. 4
  755. 4
  756. 4
  757. 4
  758. 4
  759. 4
  760. 4
  761. 4
  762. 4
  763. 4
  764. 4
  765. 4
  766. 4
  767. 4
  768. 4
  769. 4
  770. 4
  771. 4
  772. 4
  773. 4
  774. 4
  775. 4
  776. 4
  777. 4
  778. 4
  779. 4
  780. 4
  781. 4
  782. 4
  783. 4
  784. 4
  785. 4
  786. 4
  787. 4
  788. 4
  789. 4
  790. 4
  791. 4
  792. 4
  793. 4
  794. 4
  795. 4
  796. 4
  797. 4
  798. 4
  799. 4
  800. 4
  801. 4
  802. 4
  803. 4
  804. 4
  805. 4
  806. 4
  807. 4
  808. 4
  809. 4
  810. 4
  811. 4
  812. 4
  813. 4
  814. 4
  815. 4
  816. 4
  817. 4
  818. 4
  819. 4
  820. 4
  821. 4
  822. 4
  823. 4
  824. 4
  825. 4
  826. 4
  827. 4
  828. 4
  829. 4
  830. 4
  831. 4
  832. 4
  833. 4
  834. 4
  835. 4
  836. 4
  837. 4
  838. 4
  839. 4
  840. 4
  841. 4
  842. 4
  843. 4
  844. 4
  845. 4
  846. 4
  847. 4
  848. 4
  849. 4
  850. 4
  851. 4
  852. 4
  853. 4
  854. 4
  855. 4
  856. 4
  857. 4
  858. 4
  859. 4
  860. 4
  861. 4
  862. 4
  863. 4
  864. 4
  865. 4
  866. 4
  867. 4
  868. 4
  869.  @captainalex157  The difference between Europe and India is that India is not Western and never will be Western. There is nothing culturally, mentally or physically similar that White Americans share with Indians. White Americans are descendants of Europeans, they are family. There has only ever been one non-White nation in the world that has become accepted by the West and that is Japan but it wasn't an easy road. The Meiji era, fear of Western colonisation, desire to become Western and WW2 created a path for Japan to become accepted by the West. Then the 1980s saw Japan become America's first economic rival. Thankfully for the Americans, Japan's economy tanked in the 1990s and it has been downhill since. The idea that India will be accepted and treated as an equal is far fetched and preposterous in my opinion. Biden mulled sanctioning India in 2022 because of is neutral stance in the Ukraine War and a recent book published by an American diplomat suggests India could become a future competitor of the US. India and the US have never been allies, in fact it was not until 9/11 that India and the US started building closer ties to combat terrorism but still not allies. Before that, the US government hated India, particularly under Nixon. India sees itself as a part of the Global South and clearly said it is going to use its platform as the G20 presidency this year to further Global South agendas, the US doesn't like that and never will. India's development path is one that is muddy and uncertain.
    4
  870. 4
  871. 4
  872. 4
  873. 4
  874. 4
  875. 4
  876. 4
  877. 4
  878. 4
  879. 4
  880. 4
  881. 4
  882. 4
  883. 4
  884. 4
  885. 4
  886. 4
  887. 4
  888. 4
  889. 4
  890. 4
  891. 4
  892. 4
  893. 4
  894. 4
  895. 4
  896. 4
  897. 4
  898. 4
  899. 4
  900. 4
  901. 4
  902. 4
  903. 4
  904. 4
  905. 4
  906. 4
  907. 4
  908. 4
  909. 4
  910. 4
  911. 4
  912. 4
  913. 4
  914. 4
  915. 4
  916. 4
  917. 4
  918. 4
  919. 4
  920. 4
  921. 4
  922. 4
  923. 4
  924. 4
  925. 4
  926. 4
  927. 4
  928. 4
  929. 4
  930. 4
  931. 4
  932. 4
  933. 4
  934. 4
  935. 4
  936. 4
  937. 4
  938. 4
  939. 4
  940. 4
  941. 4
  942. 4
  943. 4
  944. 4
  945.  @raibhansjadhavrsj6352  Indians getting called terrorists mainly involve Sikhs and that's because they wear turbans. Additionally, this whole thing about Indians/Sikhs being called terrorists only happens in the US because people are very informed about the world around them. Additionally, Indian stereotypes (e.g. model minority, tech worker etc.) are never applied to Arabs anywhere in the West. Also, let's not forget the fact that Pakistanis are stereotyped as terrorists and people in the US can't tell the difference between North Indians and Pakistanis. Arabs and Indians are very different. Arab culture and Indian culture are on the whole very different. Indians have more in common with other South Asians than they do with Arabs. Additionally, India is part of the Indian Cultural Sphere alongside South and Southeast Asia. Middle East is part of a totally different cultural region. In fact, Arabs have more in common with Europeans through their shared history (Mediterranean civilisation, Helenic world, Abrahmic religions). India is totally different and is part of the Dharmic/Indic world (which also had a big impact on East Asia). Chinese philosopher, Hu Shi famously said, "“India conquered and dominated China culturally for 20 centuries without ever having to send a single soldier across her border”. Just google "effeminate Bengali man" and read about this whole situation instead ofdeflecting. There are many books written by Indians about this topic. Facts over feelings. BTW, not having facial hair doesn't make anybody less of a man. 💀
    4
  946. 4
  947. 4
  948. 4
  949. 4
  950. 4
  951. 4
  952. 4
  953. 4
  954. 4
  955. 4
  956. 4
  957. 4
  958. 4
  959. 4
  960. 4
  961. 4
  962. 4
  963. 4
  964. 4
  965. 4
  966. 4
  967. 4
  968. 4
  969. 4
  970. 4
  971. 4
  972. 4
  973. 4
  974.  @hunterblake5911  No it always has not. You're being biased because the Philippines is your country. The facts don't lie. Up until 2022, the average Sri Lankan was living a much better life than the average Filipino. You have some sort of biased attitude towards Sri Lankans and think they're poor and continue to focus on some students that live in the Philippines, you seriously need to calm down because it's facts over feelings. One can easily point out the fact that there are Filipino workers working in Sri Lanka as migrant workers, so what now? Sri Lanka is only second to the Maldives in South Asia in terms of quality of life and the Maldives today is on track to becoming a high income developed nation. Are you aware that there are thousands of Filipino migrant workers working in the Maldives sending remittances back home? As I said before, Sri Lanka peaked as an upper middle income nation in 2019 - it was once part of the same category that included the Maldives. Let's also not forget the fact that the Philippines couldn't even control COVID-19 because of their poor healthcare system while Sri Lanka was able to bring cases down to 0 because of their good healthcare system in 2020. The Philippines struggled right from the beginning to control COVID-19 but Sri Lanka was quick and efficient and was able to control COVID-19 throughout much of 2020. The average Sri Lankan was living a much better life in 2020 than the average Filipino, even after the damaging effects of COVID-19 on the Philippines right from the beginning of 2020, you think they lived a better quality of life? I'm sorry but you repeating that same fact over and over is not going to change reality. Your emotions and feelings don't dictate facts. The average Sri Lankan was living a much better life than the average Filipino prior to 2022, the stats don't lie.
    4
  975. 4
  976. 4
  977. 4
  978. 4
  979. 4
  980. 4
  981. 4
  982. 4
  983. 4
  984. 4
  985. 4
  986. 4
  987. 4
  988. 4
  989. 4
  990. 4
  991. 4
  992. 4
  993. 4
  994. 4
  995. 4
  996. 4
  997. 4
  998. 3
  999. 3
  1000. 3
  1001. 3
  1002. 3
  1003. 3
  1004. 3
  1005. 3
  1006. 3
  1007. 3
  1008. 3
  1009. 3
  1010. 3
  1011. 3
  1012. 3
  1013. 3
  1014. 3
  1015. 3
  1016. 3
  1017. 3
  1018. 3
  1019. 3
  1020. 3
  1021. 3
  1022. 3
  1023. 3
  1024. 3
  1025. 3
  1026. 3
  1027. 3
  1028. 3
  1029. 3
  1030. 3
  1031. 3
  1032. 3
  1033. 3
  1034. 3
  1035. 3
  1036. 3
  1037. 3
  1038. 3
  1039. 3
  1040. 3
  1041. 3
  1042. 3
  1043. 3
  1044. 3
  1045. 3
  1046. 3
  1047. 3
  1048. 3
  1049. 3
  1050. 3
  1051. 3
  1052. 3
  1053. 3
  1054. 3
  1055. 3
  1056. 3
  1057. 3
  1058. 3
  1059. 3
  1060. 3
  1061. 3
  1062. 3
  1063. 3
  1064. 3
  1065. 3
  1066. 3
  1067. 3
  1068. 3
  1069. 3
  1070. 3
  1071. 3
  1072. 3
  1073. 3
  1074. 3
  1075. 3
  1076. 3
  1077. 3
  1078. 3
  1079. 3
  1080. 3
  1081. It's because India's shine has now disappeared. It's not just China, it's very much the whole of Asia and really the whole world that thinks the same way. The reality is that the glory days of India when Indic culture was spread across Asia is now long gone. What people see is a shell of what India once was and it's just shocking to see how India which gave the world Buddhism, meditation, yoga and all these other aspects is in the state that it is in today, where people do not respect it. There are so many issues present in India today like the mistreatment of women and girls, open defecation, undeveloped infrastructure, unhygienic practices used in preparing street food, high infant mortality rate and so on. So many videos have gone viral on international social media like TikTok and Twitter showcasing very shocking aspects of Indian society that has sadly ruined the reputation of India and its people over the course of 2023. These practices were once common in other Asian countries as far recent as the 1970s but now not anymore. The reality is that India is still very far behind. I used to think India was following China's trajectory and I thought modern India was currently somewhere where China was back in the 1990s/early 2000s so it was developing very well but after seeing all those videos last year, my perspective changed and so did millions of others. It seems like there are areas of India, especially in the north, that are like they're still stuck in the 1940s. I don't know why Modi doesn't use the money India generates to improve these regions. I don't know, I think it's going to take India a very, very long time to change people's perspectives of the country. It's sad, really.
    3
  1082. 3
  1083. 3
  1084. 3
  1085. 3
  1086. 3
  1087. 3
  1088. 3
  1089. 3
  1090. 3
  1091. 3
  1092. 3
  1093. 3
  1094. 3
  1095. 3
  1096. 3
  1097. 3
  1098. 3
  1099. 3
  1100. 3
  1101. 3
  1102. 3
  1103. 3
  1104. 3
  1105. 3
  1106. 3
  1107. 3
  1108. 3
  1109. 3
  1110. 3
  1111. 3
  1112. 3
  1113. 3
  1114. 3
  1115. 3
  1116. 3
  1117. 3
  1118. 3
  1119. 3
  1120. 3
  1121. 3
  1122. 3
  1123. 3
  1124. 3
  1125. 3
  1126. 3
  1127. 3
  1128. 3
  1129. 3
  1130. 3
  1131. 3
  1132. 3
  1133. 3
  1134. 3
  1135. 3
  1136. 3
  1137. 3
  1138. 3
  1139. 3
  1140. 3
  1141. 3
  1142. 3
  1143. 3
  1144. 3
  1145. 3
  1146. 3
  1147. 3
  1148. 3
  1149. 3
  1150. 3
  1151. 3
  1152. 3
  1153. 3
  1154. 3
  1155. 3
  1156. 3
  1157. 3
  1158. 3
  1159. 3
  1160. 3
  1161. 3
  1162. 3
  1163. 3
  1164. 3
  1165. 3
  1166. 3
  1167. 3
  1168. 3
  1169. 3
  1170. 3
  1171. 3
  1172. 3
  1173. 3
  1174. 3
  1175. 3
  1176. 3
  1177. 3
  1178. 3
  1179. 3
  1180. 3
  1181. 3
  1182. 3
  1183. 3
  1184. 3
  1185. 3
  1186. The fertility rates of Singapore's three main ethnic groups look like this: Chinese - 0.94, Indian - 0.97 and Malay - 1.83. The Chinese and Indians have the lowest in Singapore and the Chinese and Indians have been living in Singapore for many generations before the modern nations of China and India were even formed. Chinese, Indians and Malays they all share Singaporean culture. Thus, they are far removed from the cultural psyche of China and India respectively and cannot be compared to places like Canada. It would be like comparing French-Quebec Canadians with French in France. The report you quoted is from 2010 and there are several factors as to why that is now outdated, one of which is that the fertility rate for South Asian women would've declined for natural reasons, it would've been low to begin with considering the people in question would've been of a higher status and thus having probably 2 kids while Chinese immigrants came from a One-Child Policy era China and were used to being an only sibling and thus would've only had 1 kid. Additionally, when we look at the fertility rates in India which now stands at 2 and everywhere else in South Asia, except for Pakistan, it's below replacement level so the idea that the fertility rate of South Asian women in Canada, even with new immigrants, wouldn't have decreased doesn't make sense. It would've decreased and regardless, the difference would've likely been 1 between the two groups anyway. We're talking about higher quality immigrants and then their first generation offspring, who are adapted to the local culture.
    3
  1187. 3
  1188. 3
  1189. 3
  1190. 3
  1191. 3
  1192. 3
  1193. 3
  1194. 3
  1195. 3
  1196. 3
  1197. 3
  1198. 3
  1199. 3
  1200. 3
  1201. 3
  1202. 3
  1203. 3
  1204. 3
  1205. 3
  1206. 3
  1207. 3
  1208. 3
  1209. 3
  1210. 3
  1211. 3
  1212. 3
  1213. 3
  1214. 3
  1215. 3
  1216. 3
  1217. 3
  1218. 3
  1219. 3
  1220. 3
  1221. 3
  1222. 3
  1223. 3
  1224. 3
  1225. 3
  1226. 3
  1227. 3
  1228. 3
  1229. 3
  1230. 3
  1231. 3
  1232. 3
  1233. 3
  1234. 3
  1235. 3
  1236. 3
  1237. 3
  1238. 3
  1239. 3
  1240. 3
  1241. 3
  1242. 3
  1243. 3
  1244. 3
  1245. 3
  1246. 3
  1247. 3
  1248. 3
  1249. 3
  1250. 3
  1251. 3
  1252. 3
  1253. 3
  1254. 3
  1255. 3
  1256. 3
  1257. 3
  1258. 3
  1259. 3
  1260. 3
  1261. 3
  1262. 3
  1263. 3
  1264. 3
  1265. 3
  1266. 3
  1267. 3
  1268. 3
  1269. 3
  1270. 3
  1271. 3
  1272. 3
  1273. 3
  1274. 3
  1275. 3
  1276. 3
  1277. 3
  1278. 3
  1279. 3
  1280. 3
  1281. 3
  1282. 3
  1283. 3
  1284. 3
  1285. 3
  1286. 3
  1287. 3
  1288. 3
  1289. 3
  1290. 3
  1291. 3
  1292. 3
  1293. 3
  1294. 3
  1295. 3
  1296. 3
  1297. 3
  1298. 3
  1299. 3
  1300. 3
  1301. 3
  1302. 3
  1303. 3
  1304. 3
  1305. There are a few things here I think are worth pointing out. Gautam Adani was the first person from Asia to place so high up on the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, peaking at #2. White tech billionaires have traditionally dominated the list so to see an Asian person rise so high up and so quickly was unseen until last year. Adani is known to be close to Modi (a polarising figure to those in the West). Adani Group is also linked to several sectors that Modi has listed as sectors of growth that he wants to invest in as part of India's economic growth. Adani isn't just a billionaire, he's visibly linked to India's booming corporate and IT sectors or what is described as "India Inc." and has clearly said he is interested in investing in the country's development (it is Adani that announced a complete redevelopment of Dharavi, one of Asia's largest slums). So it's no surprise that fervent nationalists in India have reacted in a way in which they field like they have been attacked. Have they been attacked? I don't know. Apparently lawyers are going to be involved but India's rise hasn't sat well with everybody. The 2022 Ukraine War led to a much more neutral India that refused to bend over to the USA's demands (it angered the US so much that Biden mulled sanctioning India at one point). It also led to a sort of revival of BRICS (a Global South-dominated bloc that includes India) and the SCO (an Asian-dominated bloc led by China and of which India is a part of). It has led to anti-American sentiment to rise in India much to the excitement of China, a 2023 survey revealed 22% of Indians fear the US is India's greatest threat (only behind China). Arch-nemesis Pakistan is no longer a concern to many of them. India has also begun using other forms of currency to make purchases with other countries without US dollars. There is talk of India, China and Russia using a gold-backed currency to make transactions with each other (of which Saudi Arabia has expressed interest). India is projected to become the third biggest economy by 2027, right behind the US whereas China is expected to rise to #1.It currently has the strongest economic growth rate and has an official plan of reaching high income status by 2047. None of this is good news for the US. As Japan generated fear among Americans in the 1980s, China became the prime fear of the US in the 2010s and 2020s and now it seems India has finally joined that rank. Chinese state media for the past decade has continuously spoken about how India will face the same treatment as China is currently facing from the US once it ascends to a position where it holds more influence. The Indians never listened but if Adani's demise is anything to go by, it's that the US doesn't like a rising India controlled by Modi and those close to him. What has happened to China since the beginning of the 21st century is beginning to happen to India. Mind you, the US has never liked India they tried to attack it at one point because India tried to prevent the Bangladesh Genocide of 1971. You know who they have consistently supported however? India's arch-nemesis Pakistan, yes even after 9/11 and hiding Bin Laden, the Americans still maintain stronger ties with Pakistan than they do with India. Something to think about.
    3
  1306. 3
  1307. 3
  1308. 3
  1309. 3
  1310. 3
  1311. 3
  1312. 3
  1313. 3
  1314. 3
  1315. 3
  1316. 3
  1317. 3
  1318. 3
  1319. 3
  1320. 3
  1321. 3
  1322. 3
  1323. 3
  1324. ​ @raibhansjadhavrsj6352  Firstly, I'm not going to comment on you talking about the sizes of your private areas with your friends. Not sure why you're airing out such private details on a public platform. Like I said, you and your friends don't represent 1 billion people. Go look at the size of [redacted] world map and tell me what you see, this is where the stereotype comes from. Secondly, why Arabs? Arabs are not the same as South Asians, they're completely different. They look different, they have different cultures, everything about them is different. They have nothing to do with this and are viewed differently in Western countries. Finally, you can google it because I can't go into detail (otherwise this is going to be a very long comment and you're not going to read it). During the Age of Exploration, the Orient was feminised by the Europeans and Asian cultures and people were seen as more effeminate than Europe. The British imperialists created a trope that there was the "manly Englishman" (who was tall and big bodied) and the effeminate Bengali man (who was short and had a small body). In discussin the effeminate nature of Indian men, Thomas Babington Macaulay, a British historian of the time, had said, "The dark, slender, and timid Hindu shrank from a conflict with the strong muscle and resolute spirit of the fair race (British), which dwelt beyond the passes". This is why South Asian actors in Hollwyood are trying to break these stereotypes by portraying roles that depict South Asian men in more masculine roles. Dev Patel has increasingly been cited as an attractive man breaking existing stereotypes through the roles he has played.
    3
  1325. 3
  1326. 3
  1327. 3
  1328. 3
  1329. 3
  1330. 3
  1331. It's so annoying when people say this because it just shows one's ignorance of Asian history and cultures. China and India are the two main cultural powers in Asia and culturally influenced East, South and Southeast Asia. People always make this distinction that "Asia" makes no sense and talk about East Asia and South Asia simply because the majority of people of East Asia and South Asia look different from each other but the reality is that culture is the binding factor here, not facial features. Ancient Asians had their own ideas of Asia such as the Japanese with the concept of "Sangoku" which centred on China, India and Japan and defined due to cultural similarities. When Imperial Japan invaded and colonised large parts of Asia during WW2 they were doing so in order to unite the areas of Asia that were culturally influenced by China and India in order to create the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere. Since the Age of Exploration, Europeans have tried to divide Asians up - they did this in Singapore creating ethnic ghettos and separating the Chinese, Malays and Indians from living together, they did the same in Malaysia and sowed division in other colonies of the regions such as Myanmar and Sri Lanka. This ignorance of Asia and this idea that the concept of "Asia" makes no sense is why the Chinese government's pro-Asian rhetoric is at an all time high today, so high that it has gained sympathisers in other parts of Asia believing in ideas that Americans and Westerners in general are a threat to the stability of Asia and being radicalised into believing in Asiacentrism - in order words the CCP is echoing the same views that the Japanese did during WW2 and people in the West continue to think the concept of "Asia" makes no sense.
    3
  1332. 3
  1333. 3
  1334. 3
  1335. 3
  1336. 3
  1337. 3
  1338. 3
  1339. 3
  1340. 3
  1341. 3
  1342. 3
  1343. 3
  1344. 3
  1345. 3
  1346. 3
  1347. 3
  1348. 3
  1349. 3
  1350. 3
  1351. 3
  1352. 3
  1353. 3
  1354. 3
  1355. 3
  1356. 3
  1357. 3
  1358. 3
  1359. 3
  1360. 3
  1361. 3
  1362. 3
  1363. 3
  1364. 3
  1365. 3
  1366. 3
  1367. 3
  1368. 3
  1369. 3
  1370. 3
  1371. 3
  1372. 3
  1373. 3
  1374. 3
  1375. 3
  1376. 3
  1377. 3
  1378. 3
  1379. 3
  1380. 3
  1381. 3
  1382. 3
  1383. 3
  1384. 3
  1385. 3
  1386. 3
  1387. 3
  1388. 3
  1389. 3
  1390. 3
  1391. 3
  1392. 3
  1393. 3
  1394. 3
  1395. 3
  1396. 3
  1397. 3
  1398. 3
  1399. 3
  1400. 3
  1401. 3
  1402. 3
  1403. 3
  1404. 3
  1405. 3
  1406. 3
  1407. 3
  1408. 3
  1409. 3
  1410.  @goeast12  Chinese, Malays and Indians are all from different cultures. The idea that Singapore is not diverse because most people are from different Asian groups is wrong because you're implying that they are all basically the same. Asia is a diverse place. You are only saying this because in the US, many European-descended people (excluding those of Italian and other Mediterranean and eastern European people) have lost touch with their ancestral heritage and so now they're just a mish-mash of different European groups with no unified cultural heritage. It may be news to you but local Chinese, Malays and Indians find more in common culturally with Malaysians (who are composed of the same racial makeup, with the same ethnic subgroups and share pretty much the same culture) than they do with people that come from mainland China or India. There is extreme xenophobia and racism directed towards people from mainland China and India in Singapore. So saying "it's not diverse" doesn't make sense. Singapore actually has a lot of temporary immigrants from other parts of Asia as well as PR from other parts of Asia. It is very much diverse, just not in the way you're used to. Local Singaporeans of diverse origins alongside foreign workers and expats from Malaysia, India, China, Philippines, Bangladesh, Indonesia and Myanmar among other places. It's diverse even beyond its own local population. If it wasn't diverse, anti-immigrant sentiment and the whole "Singapore for Singaporean" mentality wouldn't exist and be a contentious issue.
    3
  1411. 3
  1412. 3
  1413. 3
  1414. 3
  1415. 3
  1416. 3
  1417. 3
  1418. 3
  1419. 3
  1420. 3
  1421. 3
  1422. 3
  1423. 3
  1424. 3
  1425. 3
  1426.  @serebii666  Their entire dispute is the result of colonialism, it doesn't change the fact that their pre-colonial cross-cultural history is still evident to this day with Hindu holy sites found across the border in modern China. China and India can come to a compromise in the same way Tajikistan and China or Myanmar and China were able to fix their border dispute many decades ago. Idk why so many people think they can't fix it. If you can sit there and genuinely believe that the US will allow another country to emerge that can compete with them then you're living in a bubble. The US is not interested in a high income India with such a huge population to sway world politics, like they're already doing. Did you not see how Euro-America reacted when India refused to join the West and support Ukraine at the expense of their historic relationship with Russia? The US government literally mulled sanctioning India. You think they won't do that in the future? India is only of interest to the US because of China. India is what Saudi Arabia or Pakistan are to the War of Terror. Wake up and realise that nobody is actually fond of India. I see so many anti-India posts all over Twitter and TikTok and comment sections filled with extreme hate like I've never seen before any country. The crazy thing about all of this is that it's not just Western conservatives but Western liberals who are espousing this hate. and yet India is controlled by a hard-line leader called Modi and his legion of nationalist followers mirror the wumao that used to be everywhere on international social media. Contagion containment you say? and the Indians are agreeing with you on this.
    3
  1427. 3
  1428. 3
  1429. 3
  1430. 3
  1431. 3
  1432. 3
  1433. 3
  1434. 3
  1435. 3
  1436. 3
  1437. 3
  1438. 3
  1439. 3
  1440. 3
  1441. 3
  1442. 3
  1443. 3
  1444. 3
  1445. 3
  1446. 3
  1447. 3
  1448. 3
  1449. 3
  1450. 3
  1451. 3
  1452. 3
  1453. 3
  1454. 3
  1455. 3
  1456. 3
  1457. 3
  1458. 3
  1459. 3
  1460. 3
  1461.  @royjacobs1204  I'm not talking about finding solace in anybody but the truth is that the Global North can't let Global South countries be pushed around because hey don't view the world in the same way the Global North does. They should be allowed to think however they want. They're independent nations. I find it strange how you can't see that the US is also bad in this context. The US and Russia are both bad in their own ways. You say "get back to me in 10 years", well we already have examples of what happen when countries get too close to the US so we don't need to wait to see what happens. Are you aware that the native Chagossian people were expelled from their own country so that the the US and UK could establish a US military base on their islands? This is the type of stuff that is not discussed in the West and people don't know unless they read about it. Sri Lanka's situation is very different. Please don't tell me you think it's because of China. Most of Sri Lanka's foreign debt is owed to international capital markets, Chinese debt only accounts for 10%. These aren't lies or anything, all political institutions have documented this such as the Australian Lowy Institute. As much as I despise the CCP, they are not responsible for Sri Lanka's debt crisis. Gotabaya Rajapaksa and the behaviour of his predecessors are the reason why Sri Lanka is suffering an economic crisis. They are way too self absorbed with uplifting themselves instead of leveraging Sri Lanka's high HDI and making use of it.
    3
  1462. 3
  1463. 3
  1464. 3
  1465. 3
  1466. 3
  1467. 3
  1468. 3
  1469. 3
  1470. 3
  1471. 2
  1472. 2
  1473. 2
  1474. 2
  1475. 2
  1476. 2
  1477. 2
  1478. 2
  1479. 2
  1480. 2
  1481. 2
  1482. 2
  1483. 2
  1484. 2
  1485. 2
  1486. 2
  1487. 2
  1488. 2
  1489. 2
  1490. 2
  1491. 2
  1492. 2
  1493. 2
  1494. 2
  1495. 2
  1496. 2
  1497. 2
  1498. 2
  1499. 2
  1500. 2
  1501. 2
  1502. 2
  1503. 2
  1504. 2
  1505. 2
  1506. 2
  1507. 2
  1508. 2
  1509. 2
  1510. 2
  1511. 2
  1512. 2
  1513. 2
  1514. 2
  1515. 2
  1516. 2
  1517. 2
  1518. 2
  1519. 2
  1520. 2
  1521. 2
  1522. 2
  1523. 2
  1524. 2
  1525. 2
  1526. 2
  1527. 2
  1528. 2
  1529. 2
  1530. 2
  1531. 2
  1532. 2
  1533. 2
  1534. 2
  1535. 2
  1536. 2
  1537. 2
  1538. 2
  1539. 2
  1540. 2
  1541. 2
  1542. 2
  1543. 2
  1544. 2
  1545. 2
  1546. 2
  1547. 2
  1548. 2
  1549. 2
  1550. 2
  1551. 2
  1552. 2
  1553. 2
  1554. 2
  1555. 2
  1556. 2
  1557. 2
  1558. 2
  1559. 2
  1560. 2
  1561. 2
  1562. 2
  1563. 2
  1564. 2
  1565. 2
  1566. 2
  1567. 2
  1568. 2
  1569. 2
  1570. 2
  1571. 2
  1572. 2
  1573. 2
  1574. 2
  1575. 2
  1576. 2
  1577. 2
  1578. 2
  1579. 2
  1580. 2
  1581. 2
  1582. 2
  1583. 2
  1584. 2
  1585. 2
  1586. 2
  1587. 2
  1588. 2
  1589. 2
  1590. 2
  1591. 2
  1592. 2
  1593. 2
  1594. 2
  1595. 2
  1596. 2
  1597. 2
  1598. 2
  1599. 2
  1600. 2
  1601. 2
  1602. 2
  1603. 2
  1604. 2
  1605. 2
  1606. 2
  1607. 2
  1608. 2
  1609. 2
  1610. 2
  1611. 2
  1612. 2
  1613. 2
  1614. 2
  1615. 2
  1616. 2
  1617. 2
  1618. 2
  1619. 2
  1620. 2
  1621. 2
  1622. 2
  1623. 2
  1624. 2
  1625. 2
  1626. 2
  1627. 2
  1628. 2
  1629.  @xlr8695  Singapore is the most successful multicultural country in Asia. There are laws in place to maintain harmony. There are three main ethnic groups in the country (Chinese, Malays and Indians) and it is by law for every housing development to have the same percentage of Chinese, Malays and Indians as there are nationally. The three ethnic groups have intermixed with each other so much that they can speak each other's languages, they've mixed their cuisines together (that's why Chinese have curry mee (mix of Chinese and Indian influences) and Indians have mee goreng (mix of Indian, Malay and Chinese influences)), they wear each other's clothing, they have their own unique creole language called Singlish that is a mix of Hokkien, English, Malay, Tamil and other languages, they celebrate each other's festivals and the list goes on. When Singapore became independent, it was a Tamil politician that created Singapore's policy on multiculturalism and the country promoted meritocracy, meaning anybody of any race could succeed in Singapore regardless of their race because it's based on merit, not your race. Singapore is a model for all other multiethnic Asian countries. You can't compare you experience and claim all Singaporean are racist. India is diverse but it doesn't mean its racially harmonious. There is so much discrimination between different Indian ethnic groups like widespread racism towards Biharis and Northeast Indians, racism towards Tamils, Malayalis and other South Indians, racism towards Punjabis, racism towards Bengalis (they're called Bongs), racism towards Kashmiris, discrimination towards scheduled castes, discrimination against religious minorities and the list goes on. Many North Indians don't even know about other parts of India. That's why they call Northeast Indians "Chinese" and "Nepali" without realising that Northeast Indians are native to India. That's why North Indians were describing that viral Sri Lankan song "South Indian" when it's literally a song from another country and spoken in a language that is not even spoken in India but they thought it was Tamil or another South Indian language. That's why North Indians got upset when foreign media praised Kerala at the start of the pandemic because Kerala had controlled the first wave of the virus. Let's also not forget the fact that Black African students have been attacked and racially stereotyped in India. As beautiful as India is, there is a lot of racism and discrimination. If you can't see that then you must be from the Hindi-speaking majority.
    2
  1630. 2
  1631. 2
  1632. 2
  1633. 2
  1634. 2
  1635. 2
  1636. 2
  1637. 2
  1638. 2
  1639. 2
  1640. 2
  1641. 2
  1642. 2
  1643. 2
  1644. 2
  1645. 2
  1646. 2
  1647. 2
  1648. 2
  1649. 2
  1650. 2
  1651. 2
  1652. 2
  1653. 2
  1654. 2
  1655. 2
  1656. 2
  1657. 2
  1658. 2
  1659. 2
  1660. 2
  1661. 2
  1662. 2
  1663. 2
  1664. 2
  1665. 2
  1666. 2
  1667. 2
  1668. 2
  1669. 2
  1670. 2
  1671. 2
  1672. 2
  1673. 2
  1674. 2
  1675. 2
  1676. 2
  1677. 2
  1678. 2
  1679. 2
  1680. 2
  1681. 2
  1682. 2
  1683. 2
  1684. 2
  1685. 2
  1686. 2
  1687. 2
  1688. 2
  1689. 2
  1690. 2
  1691. 2
  1692. 2
  1693. 2
  1694. 2
  1695. 2
  1696. 2
  1697. 2
  1698. 2
  1699. 2
  1700. 2
  1701. 2
  1702. 2
  1703. 2
  1704. 2
  1705. 2
  1706. 2
  1707. 2
  1708. 2
  1709. 2
  1710. 2
  1711. 2
  1712. 2
  1713. 2
  1714. 2
  1715. 2
  1716. 2
  1717. 2
  1718. 2
  1719. 2
  1720. 2
  1721. 2
  1722. 2
  1723. 2
  1724. 2
  1725. 2
  1726. 2
  1727. 2
  1728. 2
  1729. 2
  1730. 2
  1731. 2
  1732. 2
  1733. 2
  1734. 2
  1735. 2
  1736. 2
  1737. 2
  1738. 2
  1739. 2
  1740. 2
  1741. 2
  1742. 2
  1743. 2
  1744. 2
  1745. 2
  1746. 2
  1747. 2
  1748. 2
  1749. 2
  1750. 2
  1751. 2
  1752. 2
  1753. 2
  1754. 2
  1755. 2
  1756. 2
  1757. 2
  1758. 2
  1759. 2
  1760. 2
  1761. 2
  1762. 2
  1763. 2
  1764. 2
  1765. 2
  1766. 2
  1767. 2
  1768. 2
  1769. 2
  1770. 2
  1771. 2
  1772. 2
  1773. 2
  1774. 2
  1775. 2
  1776. 2
  1777. 2
  1778. 2
  1779. 2
  1780. 2
  1781. 2
  1782. 2
  1783. 2
  1784. 2
  1785. 2
  1786. 2
  1787. 2
  1788. 2
  1789. 2
  1790.  @PawSmalls  Just a little more information to help you understand everything. Have you heard of the Belt and Road Initiative? China is interested in using Myanmar in this project that connects Asia to Europe. China wants a direct access point to and from the Indian Ocean. By using Myanmar (and Pakistan), it will provide China the ability to get direct access to the Indian Ocean without going via the Strait of Malacca in between Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia (which is a choke point and in close proximity to Indian waters, which China doesn't like for obvious reasons). So in a time of crisis, China can easily divert its trade to Myanmar and can also use the area that it has jurisdiction over to stage blockades or other antagonistic naval exercises. It would also mean China can use the area in Myanmar to store military equipment if a naval war were to ever occur in South and Southeast Asia. Rakhine State in Myanmar is very much at the centre of this development regarding Chinese influence in Myanmar. In general, China is very interested in becoming the dominant power in the Asia-Pacific and that's why China is placing a lot of attention on certain Asian countries like Myanmar, Cambodia, Sri Lanka, Nepal etc. in an attempt to widen its political, economic and cultural influence in the region. What China wants to see is an Asia free of a US presence in which other Asian countries place China first. That's why China would very much like to see an Asia where India and Japan are working with China than against it.
    2
  1791. 2
  1792. 2
  1793. 2
  1794. 2
  1795. 2
  1796. 2
  1797. 2
  1798. 2
  1799. 2
  1800. 2
  1801. 2
  1802. 2
  1803. 2
  1804. 2
  1805. 2
  1806. 2
  1807. 2
  1808. 2
  1809. 2
  1810. 2
  1811. 2
  1812. 2
  1813. 2
  1814. 2
  1815. 2
  1816. 2
  1817. 2
  1818. 2
  1819. 2
  1820. 2
  1821. 2
  1822. 2
  1823. 2
  1824. 2
  1825. 2
  1826. 2
  1827. 2
  1828. 2
  1829. 2
  1830. 2
  1831. 2
  1832. 2
  1833. 2
  1834. 2
  1835. 2
  1836. 2
  1837. 2
  1838. 2
  1839. 2
  1840. 2
  1841. 2
  1842. 2
  1843. 2
  1844. 2
  1845. 2
  1846. 2
  1847. 2
  1848. 2
  1849. 2
  1850. 2
  1851. 2
  1852. 2
  1853. 2
  1854. 2
  1855. 2
  1856. 2
  1857. 2
  1858. 2
  1859. 2
  1860. 2
  1861. 2
  1862. 2
  1863. 2
  1864. 2
  1865. 2
  1866. 2
  1867. 2
  1868. 2
  1869. 2
  1870. 2
  1871. 2
  1872. 2
  1873. 2
  1874. 2
  1875. 2
  1876. 2
  1877. 2
  1878. 2
  1879. 2
  1880. 2
  1881. 2
  1882. 2
  1883. 2
  1884. 2
  1885. 2
  1886. 2
  1887. 2
  1888. 2
  1889. 2
  1890. 2
  1891. 2
  1892. 2
  1893. 2
  1894. 2
  1895. 2
  1896. 2
  1897. 2
  1898. 2
  1899. 2
  1900. 2
  1901. 2
  1902. 2
  1903. 2
  1904. 2
  1905. 2
  1906. 2
  1907. 2
  1908. 2
  1909. 2
  1910. 2
  1911. 2
  1912. 2
  1913. 2
  1914. 2
  1915. 2
  1916. 2
  1917. 2
  1918. 2
  1919. 2
  1920. 2
  1921. 2
  1922. 2
  1923. 2
  1924. 2
  1925. 2
  1926. 2
  1927. 2
  1928. 2
  1929. 2
  1930. 2
  1931. 2
  1932. 2
  1933. 2
  1934. 2
  1935. 2
  1936. 2
  1937. 2
  1938. 2
  1939. 2
  1940. 2
  1941. 2
  1942. 2
  1943. 2
  1944. 2
  1945. 2
  1946. 2
  1947. 2
  1948.  @athena608  Yes those things you said are true and to add, it differs depending on group and location. Brown skin is also fetishised and there are men who prefer darker skinned women and thus there is a long history of Western men who fetishised darker skinned South Asian (and Southeast Asian) women during R&R in the 1970s in Singapore and Malaysia (countries where many dark brown South Indian and Malay women live). Saint Jack, a film from the 1970s and set in Singapore, documents this reality of how South Asian, East Asian and Southeast Asian women were fetishised during the Vietnam War period by Western men when bathouses, bars and hotels became locations for sex to relieve Western soldiers of the stress of war. Many of these stereotypes of submissive women emerged during this period and mixed race Amerasian (born to Asian mother and American soldier) were born across Southeast Asia and Amerasians faced severe discrimination with the common belief that they were born to a mother who was a prostitute. Additionally, the diversity of South Asians also adds to this. Many Sri Lankan women have dark brown skin and before the civil war, Sri Lanka used to be a location for European men who went in search for a Sri Lankan wife. One of the largest waves of Sri Lankan migrants to Denmark comprised of Sri Lankan women who migrated with their Danish husbands they had met back in Sri Lanka. Not to mention that Sri Lanka remains one of the main mail order producing nations in Asia after various Southeast Asian nations like the Philippines. Dark brown women are fetishised and in Thailand (which is a major sex tourist destination), you will find many foreign men who prefer the dark brown Thai women over the lighter skinned East Asian looking Thai women.
    2
  1949. 2
  1950. 2
  1951. 2
  1952. 2
  1953. 2
  1954. 2
  1955. 2
  1956. 2
  1957. 2
  1958. 2
  1959. 2
  1960. 2
  1961. 2
  1962. 2
  1963. 2
  1964. 2
  1965. 2
  1966. 2
  1967. 2
  1968. 2
  1969. 2
  1970. 2
  1971. 2
  1972. 2
  1973. 2
  1974. 2
  1975. 2
  1976. 2
  1977. 2
  1978. 2
  1979. 2
  1980. 2
  1981. 2
  1982. 2
  1983. 2
  1984.  @chiron6699  Okay so firstly, I just want to say that I am not from Myanmar. Secondly, I fully agree with you that it's all about mentality. That explains why areas even within one country are more prosperous. For example the southern states of India are socially and infrastructurally more developed than those in the north and America's north and west coast are more developed than the south. What I was trying to say is that Myanmar as we know it may have been much smaller and only included the areas primarily inhabited by the Bamar, Rakhine and on rather than the north-western tribal groups (who only became a part of Myanmar due to colonisation) had it never been colonised by the British and merged into British India. So Myanmar in an alternate universe may have been smaller and more prosperous had it not absorbed ethnically diverse areas along the borders of India and China. Thailand is quite different to Myanmar because it is not as ethnically diverse as Myanmar. Christians in Thailand are also not a prominent demographic in Thai society unlike in Myanmar where entire tribes are majority Christian and fiercely independent. Thailand is predominantly Buddhist and most people are ethnically Thai or have assimilated into ethnic Thai society (e.g. Thai Chinese). The Muslim Malays in the south are the only different group where separatist feelings exist but that doesn't negate the fact that most Thai Malays and Muslims across southern Thailand (e.g. Phuket) are completely Thai in mentality. What Myanmar tried to do and failed was to Burmanise the population. What they hoped for was something like Thailand where everybody is culturally Thai or like China where everybody is Sinicised. Instead, they got something like India (where many states within the country have their own language, culture and ethnic group). The big difference with India though is that Myanmar tried to assimilate all ethnic groups into one culture
    2
  1985. 2
  1986. 2
  1987. 2
  1988. 2
  1989. 2
  1990. 2
  1991. 2
  1992. 2
  1993. 2
  1994. 2
  1995. 2
  1996. 2
  1997. 2
  1998.  @ridhwanasri5913  Hmm but that doesn't mean anything though. Thai Chinese are "Thai", practice Thai culture, speak Thai language, use Thai names and practice the Thai form of Buddhism. Everything about their identity is Thai and this is due to government policy which demanded all Chinese people in Thailand to adopt Thai culture and identity. 40% of Thai people have at least some Chinese ancestry, it's just a part of the ethnic framework of Thailand, it's not political. Just because one has a Chinese grandfather or Chinese father, does not mean they will immediately side with China. Many Thai celebrities are full or half Chinese. When a Thai actor whose half Chinese made a statement showing support for Hong Kong, he was cancelled by Chinese people in China and the popular TV show he was starring in was boycotted by Chinese people. There is a difference between "Chinese" as an ethnic identity and "Chinese" as a political identity. The same thing can apply to Singapore but in the case of Singapore, those Singaporean Chinese who empathise with China are part of a broader effort by the Chinese government to woo overseas ethnic Chinese and generate this idea that Asia is facing a threat from the US. The Chinese government is increasingly creating this idea of the need for ethnic Chinese to support China because an attack against China will be an attack against all ethnic Chinese. The Chinese government is also broadly encouraging pan-Asian sentiment in Asia in general, pushing this rhetoric that "Asian people should be in charge of Asia".
    2
  1999. 2
  2000. 2
  2001. 2
  2002. 2
  2003. 2
  2004. 2
  2005. 2
  2006. 2
  2007. 2
  2008. 2
  2009. 2
  2010. 2
  2011. 2
  2012. 2
  2013. 2
  2014. 2
  2015. 2
  2016. 2
  2017. 2
  2018. 2
  2019. 2
  2020. 2
  2021. 2
  2022. 2
  2023. 2
  2024. 2
  2025. 2
  2026. 2
  2027. 2
  2028. 2
  2029. 2
  2030. 2
  2031. 2
  2032. 2
  2033. 2
  2034. 2
  2035. 2
  2036. 2
  2037. 2
  2038. 2
  2039. 2
  2040. 2
  2041. 2
  2042. 2
  2043. 2
  2044. 2
  2045. 2
  2046. 2
  2047. 2
  2048. 2
  2049. 2
  2050. 2
  2051. 2
  2052. 2
  2053. 2
  2054. 2
  2055. 2
  2056. 2
  2057. 2
  2058. 2
  2059. 2
  2060. 2
  2061. 2
  2062. 2
  2063. 2
  2064. 2
  2065. 2
  2066. 2
  2067. 2
  2068. 2
  2069. 2
  2070. 2
  2071. 2
  2072. 2
  2073. 2
  2074. 2
  2075. 2
  2076. 2
  2077. 2
  2078. 2
  2079. 2
  2080. 2
  2081. 2
  2082. 2
  2083. 2
  2084. 2
  2085. 2
  2086. 2
  2087. 2
  2088. 2
  2089. 2
  2090. 2
  2091. 2
  2092. 2
  2093. 2
  2094. 2
  2095. 2
  2096. 2
  2097. 2
  2098. 2
  2099. 2
  2100. 2
  2101. 2
  2102. 2
  2103. 2
  2104. 2
  2105. 2
  2106. 2
  2107. 2
  2108. 2
  2109. 2
  2110. 2
  2111. 2
  2112. 2
  2113. 2
  2114. 2
  2115. 2
  2116. 2
  2117. 2
  2118. 2
  2119. 2
  2120. 2
  2121. 2
  2122. 2
  2123. 2
  2124. 2
  2125. 2
  2126. 2
  2127. 2
  2128. 2
  2129. 2
  2130. 2
  2131. 2
  2132. 2
  2133. 2
  2134. 2
  2135. 2
  2136. 2
  2137. 2
  2138. 2
  2139. 2
  2140. 2
  2141. 2
  2142. 2
  2143. 2
  2144. 2
  2145. 2
  2146. 2
  2147. 2
  2148. 2
  2149. 2
  2150. 2
  2151.  @lello5100  They bring up a point though. In the US, they always represent South Asian Americans with Indians (especially North Indian Hindus). The rest of that community is ignored. If you're talking about pan- Asian issues why would you only bring Indian Americans to represent the South Asian community? So when you're talking about something like Stop Asian Hate which was born out of discrimination against people of Chinese or East Asian descent or appearance as a result of COVID-19, it makes no sense to be asking the conservative Indian man called Vish Burra about his thoughts on Stop Asian Hate, who doesn't have East Asian features, because it hasn't affected him. He's never going to fully understand it. Conversely, there have been many South Asian Americans with East Asian or SEA features who have faced COVID-19 related racism. Many from the Nepalese American community have faced racial abuse and violence and a Sri Lankan American was bashed on the NYC subway. Nepalese Americans (all of whom look "East Asian" or "South Asian") have also widely participated in Stop Asian Hate rallies in the US because it affects them and their friends and families, it affects their community. So if you're going to discuss the topic of Stop Asian Hate with South Asian Americans, it makes more sense to discuss it with people who have had to change their behaviour or become vigilant as a result of their appearance. That means South Asian Americans with East Asian-looking features. I don't see why doing that is a problem. I'm from Australia, our former Miss Universe representative is of Indian descent but phenotypically she is physically more similar to Southeast Asian populations and the media interviewed her on COVID-19 racism and rightfully so because it has affected her and she's been an outspoken advocate for calling out COVID-19 related racism against East Asian-looking Asian Australians. So they can easily do the same here by bringing in South Asians that have faced this type of racism.
    2
  2152. 2
  2153. 2
  2154. 2
  2155. 2
  2156. 2
  2157. 2
  2158. 2
  2159. 2
  2160. 2
  2161. 2
  2162. 2
  2163. 2
  2164. 2
  2165. 2
  2166. 2
  2167. 2
  2168. 2
  2169. 2
  2170. 2
  2171. 2
  2172. 2
  2173. 2
  2174. 2
  2175. 2
  2176. 2
  2177. 2
  2178. 2
  2179. 2
  2180. 2
  2181. 2
  2182. 2
  2183. 2
  2184. 2
  2185. 2
  2186. 2
  2187. 2
  2188. 2
  2189. 2
  2190. 2
  2191. 2
  2192. The case of Sri Lanka is quite peculiar because this country could have followed the path of success but it went down the route of ethnic disharmony and violence. The leaders of yesteryear were more interested in fuelling their egos and righting the wrongs of the past instead of moving on. Despite the end of the war in 2009 and the hallmarks of a new economic miracle, the situation did not improve because the country was fractured along ethnic lines. With high economic growth rates of 9% in the early 2010s, Sri Lanka eventually peaked as an upper middle income nation in 2019. Sri Lankans, at one point, enjoyed a per capita national income that was higher than all other South Asian countries except for the Maldives, along with a longer life expectancy as a result of strong social services such as healthcare and education. Sri Lankans began living longer and longer to the point that the country has now become one of the fastest aging societies in the world and began to recruit migrant workers from India, Bangladesh, Nepal and Myanmar to combat its shrinking workforce (problems that high income nations face, not developing ones but it's a testament to Sri Lanka's successful efforts in boosting the quality of life for its people). Sri Lanka's last beacon of success was in 2020 when the country was successfully able to control COVID-19 by pursuing a Zero COVID policy using contact tracing and harnessing its good healthcare system bringing cases down to 0. Performing so well that it ranked #10 in the world among countries that were most successful in controlling the spread of COVID-19 by the Lowy Institute in early 2021. What we see now is civilisational collapse. All civilisations peak and decline. What a shame to see everything they achieved and what they could have achieved go down the drain. Sri Lanka now pays the price for everything wrong that its leaders, past and present, did to the country and its people. I hope in due time that the lives of the innocent people become better and that they can take control of their country from the Rajapaksas and other corrupt politicians as well as the nationalists and rebuild their country.
    2
  2193. 2
  2194. 2
  2195. 2
  2196. 2
  2197. 2
  2198. 2
  2199. 2
  2200. 2
  2201. 2
  2202. 2
  2203. 2
  2204. 2
  2205. 2
  2206. 2
  2207. 2
  2208. 2
  2209. 2
  2210. 2
  2211. 2
  2212. 2
  2213. 2
  2214. 2
  2215. 2
  2216. 2
  2217. 2
  2218. 2
  2219. 2
  2220. 2
  2221. 2
  2222. 2
  2223. 2
  2224. 2
  2225. 2
  2226. 2
  2227. 2
  2228. 2
  2229. 2
  2230. 2
  2231. 2
  2232. 2
  2233. 2
  2234. 2
  2235. 2
  2236. 2
  2237. 2
  2238. 2
  2239. 2
  2240. 2
  2241. 2
  2242. 2
  2243. 2
  2244. 2
  2245. 2
  2246. 2
  2247. 2
  2248. 2
  2249. 2
  2250. 2
  2251. 2
  2252. 2
  2253. 2
  2254. 2
  2255. 2
  2256. 2
  2257. 2
  2258. 2
  2259. 2
  2260. 2
  2261. 2
  2262. 2
  2263. 2
  2264. 2
  2265. 2
  2266. 2
  2267. 2
  2268. 2
  2269. 2
  2270. 2
  2271. 2
  2272. 2
  2273. 2
  2274. 2
  2275. 2
  2276. 2
  2277. 2
  2278. 2
  2279. 2
  2280. 2
  2281. 2
  2282. 2
  2283. 2
  2284. 2
  2285. 2
  2286. 2
  2287. 2
  2288. 2
  2289. 2
  2290. 2
  2291. 2
  2292. 2
  2293. 2
  2294. 2
  2295. 2
  2296. 2
  2297. 2
  2298. 2
  2299. 2
  2300. 2
  2301. 2
  2302. 2
  2303. 2
  2304. 2
  2305. 2
  2306. 2
  2307. 2
  2308. 2
  2309. 2
  2310. 2
  2311. 2
  2312. 2
  2313. 2
  2314. 2
  2315. 2
  2316. 2
  2317. 2
  2318. 2
  2319. 2
  2320. 2
  2321. 2
  2322. 2
  2323. 2
  2324. 2
  2325. 2
  2326. 2
  2327. 2
  2328. 2
  2329. 2
  2330. 2
  2331. 2
  2332. 2
  2333. 2
  2334. 2
  2335. 2
  2336. 2
  2337. 2
  2338.  @jameschristophercirujano6650  Yes it's definitely part of SEA cultures, it's not "Indian" but the fact is that India is culturally related to most of Southeast Asia. They're not a world apart. To infer India is not culturally Asian is to infer the base of SEA cultures is not "Asian". You are also Filipino which is quite different to other SEA (especially mainland SEA) if we're being pedantic. I'm not Indian but I'm ethnically South Asian (Sri Lankan Buddhist) and when we celebrate Songkran at the temple in my country (Australia) we have Thai, Cambodian, Burmese and Malaysian Chinese celebrate with us. Upon finding out I was of ethnic Sri Lankan descent, my Cambodian co-worker began speaking about our similarities as a way to relate to me as I am also a lot younger than him. He also happens to be of ethnic Chinese descent. I think you, as a Filipino, will find it hard as the Indic influence in the Philippines has rather faded away from modern Filipino society (nobody uses Baybayin for example and those SA/SEA-style shawls you see in old photos are now a thing of the past). I can't speak for Indians but at least for the South Asian Buddhists or those that were historically influenced by Buddhism (Sri Lankan, Nepalese, some Northeast Indians), I can see the similarities we share with both the mainland Indian Hindus and Southeast Asians. Appearance could play a role overseas in the West but see, I have epicanthic folds which has made people think I'm mixed with some Southeast Asian group (and maybe because Sri Lankan Malays exist - I have to do a DNA test to find out) but for me it doesn't affect my view, maybe because South Asians are already very diverse and many SEA are diverse too (I have seen southern Thai and Khmer who look more Indianish than typical SEA).
    2
  2339. 1. Taiwan: Don't even need to explain this 2. The Philippines: Took over Scarborough Shoal in 2012. Scarborough Shoal is part of the Philippines and was administered by the country until 2012 when China and the Philippines were caught in a stand off which resulted in China capturing the shoal. When China's control of the island was found to be illegal by the arbitration court, China ignored the verdict and sent more warships to patrol the island. To this day, China still controls the island (an island which is right next door to Luzon in the Philippines and nowhere near China). 3. Nepal: China and Nepal don't even have a bad relationship but in recent years China has begun building things within Nepalese territory and claiming it as Chinese territory. 4. Bhutan: China infamously claimed that Bhutan was a lost province of China that belonged to China in 1960, resulting in anger from the Bhutanese. China continues to claim large pieces of Bhutanese territory and began building things on Bhutanese territory which resulted in the Doklam crisis in 2017. 5. India: China attempted to advance into the Galwan Valley, a disputed territory between India and China without just respecting the status quo. The advance has since led to skirmishes along China-India border that has continued to this day and also involved the death of soldiers on both sides. China has been sending submarines and spy ships into Indian waters in the Andaman Sea since 2012. You don't see India sending submarines and spy ships into Victoria harbour in Hong Kong. 6. Vietnam: Sank a Vietnamese fishing boat among a multitude of other examples of blatant and vicious bullying towards Vietnam. 7. Malaysia: China sent 16 military jets into Malaysian airspace in 2021 in addition to other intrusive activity near Malaysia in the South China Sea 8. Indonesia: Indonesia and China don't even have a dispute but China sent warships into Indonesian waters in the Natuna Sea and also demanded Indonesia stop drilling near Natuna Islands (which is literally Indonesian territory) 9. Myanmar: China has traditionally, refused to condemn the military coup of Myanmar and vetoed any attempts to penalise the Tatmadaw. Burmese people continue to suffer but the Tatmadaw continues to be funded in part by China These are just some of China's examples of bullying. There are a lot more that involve all of these countries and which date back centuries.
    2
  2340. 2
  2341. 2
  2342. 2
  2343. 2
  2344. 2
  2345. 2
  2346. 2
  2347. 2
  2348. 2
  2349. 2
  2350. 2
  2351. 2
  2352. 2
  2353. 2
  2354. 2
  2355. 2
  2356. 2
  2357. 2
  2358. 2
  2359. 2
  2360. 2
  2361. 2
  2362. 2
  2363. 2
  2364. 2
  2365. 2
  2366. 2
  2367. 2
  2368. 2
  2369. 2
  2370. 2
  2371. 2
  2372. 2
  2373. 2
  2374. 2
  2375. 2
  2376. 2
  2377. 2
  2378. 2
  2379. 2
  2380. 2
  2381. 2
  2382. 2
  2383. 2
  2384. 2
  2385. 2
  2386. 2
  2387. 2
  2388. 2
  2389. 2
  2390. 2
  2391. 2
  2392. 2
  2393. 2
  2394. 2
  2395. 2
  2396. 2
  2397. 2
  2398. 2
  2399. 2
  2400. 2
  2401. 2
  2402. 2
  2403. 2
  2404. 2
  2405. 2
  2406. 2
  2407. 2
  2408. 2
  2409. 2
  2410. 2
  2411. 2
  2412. 2
  2413. 2
  2414. 2
  2415. 2
  2416. 2
  2417. 2
  2418. 2
  2419. 2
  2420. 2
  2421. 2
  2422. 2
  2423. 2
  2424. 2
  2425. 2
  2426. 2
  2427. 2
  2428. 2
  2429. 2
  2430. 2
  2431. 2
  2432. 2
  2433. 2
  2434. 2
  2435. 2
  2436. 2
  2437. 2
  2438. 2
  2439. 2
  2440. 2
  2441. 2
  2442. 2
  2443. 2
  2444. 2
  2445. 2
  2446. 2
  2447. 2
  2448. 2
  2449. 2
  2450. 2
  2451.  @goeast12  Singapore is a small country and uses that to excuse itself from accepting refugees, whether that's right or wrong it's not my place to say. Singapore is also very strict when it comes to managing its own ethnic diversity. It gives preference to people from Malaysia, China (including Hong Kong) and India because people from those places are of the same ethnic or of related ethnic origin to local Singaporeans. Singaporean government uses Malaysian+Chinese+Indian immigration to maintain the ratio of Chinese to Malays to Indians (the fertility rates of all three groups are incredibly low, with the Chinese and Indians having statistically less than 1 baby - 0.9 - each year). You also can't compare Singapore's ethnic demographics to the USA's ethnic demographics. Remember, the US only consisted of 13 colonies along the east coast that were taken from Native American populations. On top of that, slaves of West African origin were brought over to the US adding to the ethnic demographics. Additionally, the USA's expansion west meant it acquired land that was originally owned by Spain (and post-independent Mexico) which was already home to many people of Latin American origin (of whom many are of European origin as well as mestizo origin). Singapore's native people are Malays and like the rest of Southeast Asia, thousands of ethnic Chinese and ethnic Indian migrants settled in Singapore over the 17th, 18th, 19th and 20th centuries. Singapore and the US have different histories and different geographies.
    2
  2452. 2
  2453. 2
  2454. 2
  2455. 2
  2456. 2
  2457. 2
  2458. 2
  2459. 2
  2460. 2
  2461. 2
  2462. 2
  2463. 2
  2464. 2
  2465. 2
  2466. 2
  2467. 2
  2468. 2
  2469. 2
  2470. 2
  2471. 2
  2472. 2
  2473. 2
  2474. 2
  2475. 2
  2476. 2
  2477. 2
  2478. 2
  2479. 2
  2480.  @davidford3115  Sorry it seems I have been too judgemental and assumed the worst by grouping you with those other people without knowing anything about you. I can see after talking to you that you are rather different to those people that do fetishise. So apologies to you. Yep I agree, not many know about Greco-Buddhism which is a shame because the civilisation that emerged from the two was quite beautiful. It also happens to be that Greco-Buddhist civilisation lies in an area of modern Asia that now no longer practices Eastern philosophical traditions, which may explain why not many people know about it so it doesn't become an incentive for tourism or anything like that. Yeah I imagine it would be a lot different had those Eastern philosophies travelled to Europe (particularly with Alexander the Great). New traditions derived from those Eastern traditions would have also emerged in Europe and syncretism with European pagan beliefs may have transpired too (akin to the way Buddhism, Hinduism and Taoism were syncretised with local folk beliefs of Southeast Asia, Himalayas, Japan and regional areas of China and India). Interesting points you made about the Shinto gods, I do think that people in Europe may have been more receptive towards Eastern traditions had the indigenous European religions continued to dominate Europe. Syncretism would have been easier due to fluidity. The rigidity of the Abrahamic faiths always made it harder to accept other belief systems, which is why they all disappeared in Europe.
    2
  2481. 2
  2482. 2
  2483. 2
  2484. 2
  2485. 2
  2486. 2
  2487. 2
  2488. 2
  2489. 2
  2490. 2
  2491. 2
  2492. 2
  2493. 2
  2494. 2
  2495. 2
  2496. 2
  2497. 2
  2498. 2
  2499. 2
  2500. 2
  2501. 2
  2502. 2
  2503. 2
  2504. 2
  2505. 2
  2506. 2
  2507. 2
  2508. 2
  2509. 2
  2510. 2
  2511. 2
  2512. 2
  2513. 2
  2514. 2
  2515. 2
  2516. 2
  2517. 2
  2518. 2
  2519. 2
  2520. 2
  2521. 2
  2522. 2
  2523. 2
  2524. 2
  2525. 2
  2526. 2
  2527. 2
  2528. 2
  2529. 2
  2530. 2
  2531. 2
  2532. 2
  2533. 2
  2534. 2
  2535. 2
  2536. 2
  2537. 2
  2538. 2
  2539. 2
  2540. 2
  2541. 2
  2542. 2
  2543. 2
  2544. 2
  2545. 2
  2546. 2
  2547. 2
  2548. 2
  2549. 2
  2550. 2
  2551. 2
  2552. 2
  2553. 2
  2554. 2
  2555. 2
  2556. 2
  2557. 2
  2558. 2
  2559. 2
  2560. 2
  2561. 2
  2562. 2
  2563. 2
  2564. 2
  2565. 2
  2566. 2
  2567. 2
  2568. 2
  2569. 2
  2570. 2
  2571. 2
  2572. 2
  2573. 2
  2574. 2
  2575. 2
  2576. 2
  2577. 2
  2578. 2
  2579. 2
  2580. 2
  2581. 2
  2582. 2
  2583. 2
  2584. 2
  2585. 2
  2586. 2
  2587. 2
  2588. 2
  2589. 2
  2590. 2
  2591. 2
  2592. 2
  2593. 2
  2594. 2
  2595. 2
  2596. 2
  2597. 2
  2598. 2
  2599. 2
  2600. 2
  2601. 2
  2602. 2
  2603. 2
  2604. 2
  2605. 2
  2606. 2
  2607. 2
  2608. 2
  2609. 2
  2610. 1
  2611. 1
  2612. 1
  2613. 1
  2614. 1
  2615. 1
  2616. 1
  2617. 1
  2618. 1
  2619. 1
  2620. 1
  2621. 1
  2622. 1
  2623. 1
  2624. 1
  2625. 1
  2626. 1
  2627. 1
  2628. 1
  2629. 1
  2630. 1
  2631. 1
  2632. 1
  2633. 1
  2634. 1
  2635. 1
  2636. 1
  2637. 1
  2638. 1
  2639. 1
  2640. 1
  2641. 1
  2642. 1
  2643. 1
  2644. 1
  2645. 1
  2646. 1
  2647. 1
  2648. 1
  2649. 1
  2650. 1
  2651. 1
  2652. 1
  2653. 1
  2654. 1
  2655. 1
  2656. 1
  2657. 1
  2658. 1
  2659. 1
  2660. 1
  2661. 1
  2662. 1
  2663. 1
  2664. 1
  2665. 1
  2666. 1
  2667. 1
  2668. 1
  2669. 1
  2670. 1
  2671. 1
  2672. 1
  2673. 1
  2674. 1
  2675. 1
  2676. 1
  2677. 1
  2678. 1
  2679. 1
  2680. 1
  2681. 1
  2682. 1
  2683. 1
  2684. 1
  2685. 1
  2686. 1
  2687. 1
  2688. 1
  2689. 1
  2690. 1
  2691. 1
  2692. 1
  2693. 1
  2694. 1
  2695. ​ @aprilchan3726  I'm just talking about you not supporting Rohingyas and believeing they all deserve to be punished. That's what I'm commenting on. Your comments show that you don't care about them or like them. Is that not correct? I'm not talking about anything else that you don't or do support, I'm just talking about your belief that Rohingyas don't deserve rights in Myanmar. I'm not assuming anything. I'm commenting on what you have published here. Try to rationalise? No, how about you try and rationalise things from both perspectives? Up until 2012, there was no issue with Rohingyas. Yes Rohingyas have no rights in Myanmar but Rakhine villagers were living side by side with Rohingyas in Maungdaw and Buthidaung until the ethnic riots of 2012. You keep harking on about defense this defense that and I'm defending Myanmar and all this stuff but you're just masquerading your bigotry behind this belief. If you genuinely had a heart, you would move on. Most Rohingyas don't deserve this but no matter what you say you believe that they do. You keep speaking as if Rohingyas are the ones to blame. Have you thought about what the Rakhine people have done? It takes two to tango. Both Rohingya and Rakhine are to blame. You see, I'm rationalising things from both perspectives - you aren't. This is why I said that Myanmar is still so far behind. Look south and you see Singapore which has managed to pull itself out of ethnic division to create an ethnically harmonious nation. Malaysia doesn't have a good track record in terms of ethnic unity but it's so much better than Myanmar's way of managing diversity. Myanmar had so much potential but now look at it now. What a waste.
    1
  2696.  @aprilchan3726  1. No you believe all Rohingyas deserve punishment. Stop behaving like this. I can see all of your bigoted replies throughout this entire comment section. Crying because people keep talking about the Rohingyas. 2. I never have blamed Aung San Suu Kyi or the civilian government. The military is to blame. Accept this. 3. Crying to me and throwing a tantrum because you can't accept the fact that both sides are to blame isn't going to change this. 4. I know that before 2012 there were issues but there was a sense of calm of anf if you actually cared to listen to Rakhine people who live in Maungdaw you'd know that they said they would go to Rohingya shops and Rohingya children would play with Rakhine children. 5. There were Rohingyas in the Burmese government prior to the military takeover in the 1960s. In fact, there was a Rohingya politician who won the seat of Maungdaw in 1990. So prior to 1982, Rohingyas were (de facto) treated as a part of Burmese society. It's not my problem that you're clueless about these facts and are instead parroting propaganda because you're more interested in defending the Tatmadaw. Facts over feelings. You stating all this stuff isn't going to change the fact the Rohingyas were treated as a part of Burmese society by their representation in Burmese politics. Go cry about it. 6. No you didn't win the argument. You're just running around in cirlces claiming i'm ignorant when I am fully educated on this topic. Also, no I will never delete my comments. Why would I? Everything I said is correct. It is you that should delete your comments after failing to get your facts straight, not once, not twice but three times. Please, this whole thing is so funny.
    1
  2697. 1
  2698. 1
  2699. 1
  2700. 1
  2701. 1
  2702. 1
  2703. 1
  2704. 1
  2705. 1
  2706. 1
  2707. 1
  2708. 1
  2709. 1
  2710. 1
  2711. 1
  2712. 1
  2713. 1
  2714. 1
  2715. 1
  2716. 1
  2717. 1
  2718. 1
  2719. 1
  2720. 1
  2721. 1
  2722. 1
  2723. 1
  2724. 1
  2725. 1
  2726. 1
  2727. 1
  2728. 1
  2729. 1
  2730. 1
  2731. 1
  2732. 1
  2733. 1
  2734. 1
  2735. 1
  2736. 1
  2737. 1
  2738. 1
  2739. 1
  2740. 1
  2741. 1
  2742. 1
  2743. 1
  2744. 1
  2745. 1
  2746. 1
  2747. 1
  2748. 1
  2749. 1
  2750. 1
  2751. 1
  2752. 1
  2753. 1
  2754. 1
  2755. 1
  2756. 1
  2757. 1
  2758. 1
  2759. 1
  2760. 1
  2761. 1
  2762. 1
  2763. Japan is the most "Western" country in Asia, that's why. It was the first Asian country to Westernise itself in order to escape Western imperialism and did everything it could to adopt Western mannerisms and be accepted by the West. It let go of its traditional calendrical system and adopted the Gregorian calendar. So while the rest of Asia celebrates Lunar New Year or Vesak (Buddha's Birthday) 1-3 months later, Japan has already celebrated these festivals. It forgo its traditional clothing in areas of business and government and adopted the Western suit. This all happened during the Meiji era. It was also the first and currently only Asian country in the modern era to adopt Western imperialistic tactics and create its own empire whilst allying itself with certain Western countries that believed in its irredentist ideology. The country does everything to please the West, so it's no surprise that the country prefers to associate itself with Western countries post WW2. It also explains why there is a deep admiration and fetishisation of Japan by Westerners and vice versa. So much to the point that you have White supremacists that idolise Japan, the only non-Western country they admire. Singapore, which is incredibly rich and highly advanced and also very Eastern in way of thinking and governance, on the other hand has never received such admiration from the West. In fact, it is often that I hear criticism about Singapore and its governance from Western media than anything positive about it when it comes to governance and public policy.
    1
  2764. 1
  2765. 1
  2766. 1
  2767. 1
  2768. 1
  2769. 1
  2770. 1
  2771. 1
  2772. 1
  2773. 1
  2774. 1
  2775. 1
  2776. 1
  2777. 1
  2778. 1
  2779. 1
  2780. 1
  2781. 1
  2782. 1
  2783. 1
  2784. 1
  2785. 1
  2786. 1
  2787. 1
  2788. 1
  2789. 1
  2790. 1
  2791. 1
  2792. 1
  2793. 1
  2794. 1
  2795. 1
  2796. 1
  2797. 1
  2798. 1
  2799. 1
  2800. 1
  2801. 1
  2802. 1
  2803. 1
  2804. 1
  2805. 1
  2806. 1
  2807. 1
  2808. 1
  2809. 1
  2810. 1
  2811. 1
  2812. 1
  2813. 1
  2814. 1
  2815. 1
  2816. 1
  2817. 1
  2818. 1
  2819. 1
  2820. 1
  2821. 1
  2822. 1
  2823. 1
  2824. 1
  2825. 1
  2826. 1
  2827. 1
  2828. 1
  2829. 1
  2830. 1
  2831. 1
  2832. 1
  2833. 1
  2834. 1
  2835. 1
  2836. 1
  2837. 1
  2838. 1
  2839. 1
  2840. 1
  2841. 1
  2842. 1
  2843. 1
  2844. 1
  2845. 1
  2846. 1
  2847. 1
  2848. 1
  2849. 1
  2850. 1
  2851. 1
  2852. 1
  2853. 1
  2854. 1
  2855. 1
  2856. 1
  2857. 1
  2858. 1
  2859. 1
  2860. 1
  2861. 1
  2862. 1
  2863. 1
  2864. 1
  2865. 1
  2866. 1
  2867. 1
  2868. 1
  2869. 1
  2870. 1
  2871. 1
  2872. 1
  2873. 1
  2874. 1
  2875. 1
  2876. 1
  2877. 1
  2878. 1
  2879. 1
  2880. 1
  2881. 1
  2882. 1
  2883. 1
  2884. 1
  2885. 1
  2886. 1
  2887. 1
  2888. 1
  2889. 1
  2890. 1
  2891. 1
  2892. 1
  2893. 1
  2894. 1
  2895. 1
  2896. 1
  2897. 1
  2898. 1
  2899. @KrO Asians in Asia know what the Europeans did not so long ago. So don't blame them that they have tight immigration rules. Have you forgotten colonialism? Sorry but your house example does not make sense because at this current moment, it is the Asian Americans who are at the top of US society (they didn't go there to "decorate" US society). They're the ones actually contributing to the country by dominating STEM fields, creating start ups and competing with the rest of the world. Let's also not forget that not all Asians in the US are immigrants, many are first and second generation born Americans but I already know that the US considers them "perpetual foreigners". Truth is American society is incredibly scared of Asians and continuously has been since the 1980s when Japan was rising. Fast forward and the same fear exists in the form of China today, in another 10 years the next country could be India (at least that's what Chinese state media continues to say). On top of that fear is the fear of educated Asian immigrants and their descendants. That's why Chinese and Indian tech workers face threats of violence and why people in the US (on both sides of the political spectrum) are attacking Asians. One side is claiming Asians are "white-adjacent" - and yes that term has been used to describe the brown skinned Indians too - and that "Asian privilege" is a thing and the other side is either violently threatening them or asking for immigration from Asia to be stopped. So yeah, they're very scared.
    1
  2900. 1
  2901. 1
  2902. 1
  2903. 1
  2904. 1
  2905. 1
  2906. 1
  2907. 1
  2908. 1
  2909. 1
  2910. 1
  2911. 1
  2912. 1
  2913. 1
  2914. 1
  2915. 1
  2916. 1
  2917. 1
  2918. 1
  2919. 1
  2920. 1
  2921. 1
  2922. 1
  2923. 1
  2924. 1
  2925. 1
  2926. 1
  2927. 1
  2928. 1
  2929. 1
  2930. 1
  2931. 1
  2932. 1
  2933. 1
  2934. 1
  2935. 1
  2936. 1
  2937. 1
  2938. 1
  2939. 1
  2940. 1
  2941. 1
  2942. 1
  2943. 1
  2944. 1
  2945. 1
  2946. 1
  2947. 1
  2948. 1
  2949. 1
  2950. 1
  2951. 1
  2952. 1
  2953. 1
  2954. 1
  2955. 1
  2956. 1
  2957. 1
  2958. 1
  2959. 1
  2960. 1
  2961. 1
  2962. 1
  2963. 1
  2964. 1
  2965. 1
  2966. 1
  2967. 1
  2968. 1
  2969. 1
  2970. 1
  2971. 1
  2972. 1
  2973. 1
  2974. 1
  2975. 1
  2976. 1
  2977. 1
  2978. 1
  2979. 1
  2980. 1
  2981. 1
  2982. 1
  2983. 1
  2984. 1
  2985. 1
  2986. 1
  2987. 1
  2988. 1
  2989. 1
  2990. 1
  2991. 1
  2992. 1
  2993. 1
  2994. 1
  2995. 1
  2996. 1
  2997. 1
  2998. 1
  2999. 1
  3000. 1
  3001. 1
  3002. 1
  3003. 1
  3004. 1
  3005. 1
  3006. 1
  3007. 1
  3008. 1
  3009. 1
  3010. 1
  3011. 1
  3012. 1
  3013. 1
  3014. 1
  3015. 1
  3016. 1
  3017. 1
  3018. 1
  3019. 1
  3020. 1
  3021. 1
  3022. 1
  3023. 1
  3024. 1
  3025. 1
  3026. 1
  3027. 1
  3028. 1
  3029. 1
  3030. 1
  3031. 1
  3032. 1
  3033. 1
  3034. 1
  3035. 1
  3036. 1
  3037. 1
  3038. 1
  3039. 1
  3040. 1
  3041. 1
  3042. 1
  3043. 1
  3044. 1
  3045. 1
  3046. 1
  3047. 1
  3048. 1
  3049. 1
  3050. 1
  3051. 1
  3052. 1
  3053. 1
  3054. 1
  3055. 1
  3056. 1
  3057. 1
  3058. 1
  3059. 1
  3060. 1
  3061. 1
  3062. 1
  3063. 1
  3064. 1
  3065. 1
  3066. 1
  3067. 1
  3068. 1
  3069. 1
  3070. 1
  3071. 1
  3072. 1
  3073. 1
  3074. 1
  3075. 1
  3076. 1
  3077. 1
  3078. 1
  3079. 1
  3080. 1
  3081. 1
  3082. 1
  3083. 1
  3084. 1
  3085. 1
  3086. 1
  3087. 1
  3088. 1
  3089. 1
  3090. 1
  3091. 1
  3092. 1
  3093. 1
  3094. 1
  3095. 1
  3096. 1
  3097. 1
  3098. 1
  3099. 1
  3100. 1
  3101. 1
  3102. 1
  3103. 1
  3104. 1
  3105. 1
  3106. 1
  3107. 1
  3108. 1
  3109. 1
  3110. 1
  3111. 1
  3112. 1
  3113. 1
  3114. 1
  3115. 1
  3116. 1
  3117. 1
  3118. 1
  3119. 1
  3120. 1
  3121. 1
  3122. 1
  3123. 1
  3124. 1
  3125. 1
  3126. 1
  3127. 1
  3128. 1
  3129. 1
  3130. 1
  3131. 1
  3132. 1
  3133. 1
  3134. 1
  3135. 1
  3136. 1
  3137. 1
  3138. 1
  3139. 1
  3140. 1
  3141. 1
  3142. 1
  3143. 1
  3144. 1
  3145. 1
  3146. 1
  3147. 1
  3148. 1
  3149. 1
  3150. 1
  3151. 1
  3152. 1
  3153. 1
  3154. 1
  3155. 1
  3156. 1
  3157. 1
  3158. 1
  3159. 1
  3160. 1
  3161. 1
  3162. 1
  3163. 1
  3164. 1
  3165. 1
  3166. 1
  3167. 1
  3168. 1
  3169. 1
  3170. 1
  3171. 1
  3172. 1
  3173. 1
  3174. 1
  3175. 1
  3176. 1
  3177. 1
  3178. 1
  3179. 1
  3180. 1
  3181. 1
  3182. 1
  3183. 1
  3184. 1
  3185. 1
  3186. 1
  3187. 1
  3188. 1
  3189. 1
  3190. 1
  3191. 1
  3192. 1
  3193. 1
  3194. 1
  3195. 1
  3196. 1
  3197. 1
  3198. 1
  3199. 1
  3200. 1
  3201. 1
  3202. 1
  3203. 1
  3204. 1
  3205. 1
  3206. 1
  3207. 1
  3208. 1
  3209. 1
  3210. 1
  3211. 1
  3212. 1
  3213. 1
  3214. 1
  3215. 1
  3216. 1
  3217. 1
  3218. 1
  3219. 1
  3220. 1
  3221. 1
  3222. 1
  3223. 1
  3224. 1
  3225. 1
  3226. 1
  3227. 1
  3228.  @manofsan  1. Japan is part of the RCEP 2. You believe in way too much propaganda it's sad. This is why India hasn't progressed and it's disappointing to see India like this because I really like Indian culture 3. What did I say that proves that I support everything the CCP does?? Tell me. Oh wait, you don't have an answer. You're just making stuff up because you don't like what I'm saying 4. India would be thriving if it wasn't using the political system it is currently using. I have come to the realisation that Asian countries do better under a hardline leader or a group of hardline leaders. Had India been run in such a manner then it would have been light years ahead. Why? It's because there wouldn't be so much bickering and didagreement over issues. Nobody would be pulling out the religion card and things would have been enforced and enabled a long time ago. However, that is not the case for India. India is still relying so much on agriculture that it does not have the ability to open itself up to the world because it's not up to the standard of the markets of other countries. It's still stuck in the 1990s and people, like yourself, don't realise this. This is why Bangladesh is ahead of India now. They're following the same economic model of the Asian Tiger economies. No wonder they're called the new Asian Tiger eoconomy. They're doing so well that they have a set target of becoming a developed nation by 2041. Malaysia followed the same model and they also set a target for themselves too and now they're going to become a developed nation later this decade. The whole of Asia is powering ahead and you're still championing protectionism over integration.
    1
  3229. 1
  3230. 1
  3231. 1
  3232. 1
  3233. 1
  3234. 1
  3235. 1
  3236. 1
  3237. 1
  3238. 1
  3239. 1
  3240. 1
  3241. 1
  3242. 1
  3243. 1
  3244. 1
  3245. 1
  3246. 1
  3247. 1
  3248. 1
  3249. 1
  3250. 1
  3251. 1
  3252. 1
  3253. 1
  3254. 1
  3255. 1
  3256. 1
  3257. 1
  3258. 1
  3259. 1
  3260. 1
  3261. 1
  3262. 1
  3263. 1
  3264. 1
  3265. 1
  3266. 1
  3267. 1
  3268. 1
  3269. 1
  3270. 1
  3271. 1
  3272. 1
  3273. 1
  3274. 1
  3275. 1
  3276. 1
  3277. 1
  3278. 1
  3279. 1
  3280. 1
  3281. 1
  3282. 1
  3283. 1
  3284. 1
  3285. 1
  3286. 1
  3287. 1
  3288. 1
  3289. 1
  3290. 1
  3291. 1
  3292. 1
  3293. 1
  3294. 1
  3295. 1
  3296. 1
  3297. 1
  3298. 1
  3299. 1
  3300. 1
  3301. 1
  3302. 1
  3303. 1
  3304. 1
  3305. 1
  3306. 1
  3307. 1
  3308. 1
  3309. 1
  3310. 1
  3311. 1
  3312. 1
  3313. 1
  3314. 1
  3315. 1
  3316. 1
  3317. 1
  3318. 1
  3319. 1
  3320. 1
  3321. 1
  3322. 1
  3323. 1
  3324. 1
  3325. 1
  3326. 1
  3327. 1
  3328. 1
  3329. 1
  3330. 1
  3331. 1
  3332. 1
  3333. 1
  3334. 1
  3335. 1
  3336. 1
  3337. 1
  3338. 1
  3339. 1
  3340. 1
  3341. 1
  3342. 1
  3343. 1
  3344. 1
  3345. 1
  3346. 1
  3347. 1
  3348. 1
  3349. 1
  3350. 1
  3351. 1
  3352. 1
  3353. 1
  3354. 1
  3355. 1
  3356. 1
  3357. 1
  3358. 1
  3359. 1
  3360. 1
  3361. 1
  3362. 1
  3363. 1
  3364. 1
  3365. 1
  3366. 1
  3367. 1
  3368. 1
  3369. 1
  3370. 1
  3371. 1
  3372. 1
  3373. 1
  3374. 1
  3375. 1
  3376. 1
  3377. 1
  3378. 1
  3379. 1
  3380. 1
  3381. 1
  3382. 1
  3383. 1
  3384. 1
  3385. 1
  3386. 1
  3387. 1
  3388. 1
  3389. 1
  3390. 1
  3391. 1
  3392. 1
  3393. 1
  3394. 1
  3395. 1
  3396. 1
  3397. 1
  3398. 1
  3399. 1
  3400. 1
  3401. 1
  3402. 1
  3403. 1
  3404. 1
  3405. 1
  3406. 1
  3407. 1
  3408. 1
  3409. 1
  3410. 1
  3411. 1
  3412. 1
  3413. 1
  3414. 1
  3415. 1
  3416. 1
  3417. 1
  3418. 1
  3419. 1
  3420. 1
  3421. 1
  3422. 1
  3423. 1
  3424. 1
  3425. 1
  3426. 1
  3427. 1
  3428. 1
  3429. 1
  3430. 1
  3431. 1
  3432. 1
  3433. 1
  3434. 1
  3435. 1
  3436. 1
  3437. 1
  3438. 1
  3439. 1
  3440. 1
  3441. 1
  3442. 1
  3443. 1
  3444. 1
  3445. 1
  3446. 1
  3447. 1
  3448. 1
  3449. 1
  3450. 1
  3451. 1
  3452. 1
  3453. 1
  3454. 1
  3455. 1
  3456. 1
  3457. 1
  3458. 1
  3459. 1
  3460. 1
  3461. 1
  3462. 1
  3463. 1
  3464. 1
  3465. 1
  3466. 1
  3467. 1
  3468. 1
  3469. 1
  3470. 1
  3471. 1
  3472. 1
  3473. 1
  3474. 1
  3475. 1
  3476. 1
  3477. 1
  3478. 1
  3479. 1
  3480. 1
  3481. 1
  3482. 1
  3483. 1
  3484. 1
  3485. 1
  3486.  @daniellebcooper7160  I'm not twisting anything. You inferred that people who are in the minority shouldn't be visible on TV screens. You're upset about the fact that non-Anglo Australian minorities are being featured in advertisements for Coles, Woolworths, banks and so on. You're upset about that and that gives me the idea that you don't want to see any non-Anglo Australians on TV. It's not overuse. 36.1% of Australians are English, the other 63.9% of Australians are of other European, Asian, African, Pacific Islander etc. origins and you're telling me that they are overrepresented. Idk why you're so upset that a Chinese woman, Italian nonna or Indian mother are being featured in random advertisements on TV when they are part of the Australian population. Why are you so upset about this? If you scroll up you'll find another user who called you out but you never replied to them. Supporting Jacinta Price doesn't mean one's racist views towards Aboriginals is cancelled out. I'm sorry but it looks to me that you call everybody you disagree with an SJW/Woke person. Why? I don't know what your intention is Danielle but I'll say this. You saying these things makes it seem like those of us who are not of Anglo origin don't deserve to be here and considering the fact that Australia has a sad history of targeting new migrants (Irish, Italians, Greeks, Dutch, Vietnamese, Lebanese etc.), your views sound all the more worse. I don't know what your other beliefs are but that's the impression I have received from your comments. P.S. Thanks + good morning
    1
  3487. 1
  3488. 1
  3489. 1
  3490. 1
  3491. 1
  3492. 1
  3493. 1
  3494. 1
  3495. 1
  3496. 1
  3497. 1
  3498. 1
  3499. 1
  3500. 1
  3501. 1
  3502. 1
  3503. 1
  3504. 1
  3505. 1
  3506. 1
  3507. 1
  3508. 1
  3509. 1
  3510. 1
  3511. 1
  3512. 1
  3513. 1
  3514. 1
  3515. 1
  3516. 1
  3517. 1
  3518. 1
  3519. 1
  3520. 1
  3521. 1
  3522. 1
  3523. 1
  3524. 1
  3525. 1
  3526. 1
  3527. 1
  3528. 1
  3529. 1
  3530. 1
  3531. 1
  3532. 1
  3533. 1
  3534. 1
  3535. 1
  3536. 1
  3537. 1
  3538. 1
  3539. 1
  3540. 1
  3541. 1
  3542. 1
  3543. 1
  3544. 1
  3545. 1
  3546. 1
  3547. 1
  3548. 1
  3549. 1
  3550. 1
  3551. 1
  3552. 1
  3553. 1
  3554. 1
  3555. 1
  3556. 1
  3557. 1
  3558. 1
  3559. 1
  3560. 1
  3561. 1
  3562. 1
  3563. 1
  3564. 1
  3565. 1
  3566. 1
  3567. 1
  3568. 1
  3569. 1
  3570. 1
  3571. 1
  3572. 1
  3573. 1
  3574. 1
  3575. 1
  3576. 1
  3577. 1
  3578. 1
  3579. 1
  3580. 1
  3581. 1
  3582. 1
  3583. 1
  3584. 1
  3585. 1
  3586. 1
  3587. 1
  3588. 1
  3589. 1
  3590. 1
  3591. 1
  3592. 1
  3593. 1
  3594. 1
  3595. 1
  3596. 1
  3597. 1
  3598. 1
  3599. 1
  3600. 1
  3601. 1
  3602.  @ogolow570  That's not true at all. It has nothing to do with their genetics or appearance, it's to do with culture. Kaman Muslims look exactly like Rohingyas but with light brown skin but their culture is more similar to Bamar Buddhists and the language they speak (Arakanese) is closely related to Burmese. Tatmadaw of Myanmar believes in Burmanisation and so groups that are culturally unrelated to Bamar face persecution in hopes that they will become Burmanised. Hui are also closely related to Han Chinese in language and culture. Same thing in China, Sinicisation means that all groups culturally unrelated to Han face persecution in order to be Sinicised. China wants the Uyghur to be Sinicised and their practice of Islam must be compatible with Han Chinese culture just like Hui who practice a moderate form of Islam with significant Han Chinese influence in their culture. Rohingyas are Indo-Aryan mixed with Tibeto-Burman, Rohingyas don't all look the same. Some Rohingyas look more like the majority of Bamar Buddhists like Wai Wai Nu who is a pro-democracy activist of Rohingya descent. Also, Bamar Buddhists are diverse, some of them look remarkably closer to the majority of Rohingya like Major General Soe Naing Oo and Burmese actor, Hugo Naing. Same thing with Uyghurs, some Uyghurs look more similar to Han Chinese. It's do with culture rather than appearance, only some government officials in Myanmar have made unjust remarks about Rohingyas and called them anti-Muslim slurs but I would say that's the result of Rohingyas in the 1940s campaigning to become part of Pakistan, which is why the Rohingya Hindus and Christians are treated better than their Muslim counterparts. It also explains why in the past Kaman were xenophobic towards Rohingyas. Until 2021, many viewed Rohingya Muslims as traitors.
    1
  3603. 1
  3604. 1
  3605. 1
  3606. 1
  3607. 1
  3608. 1
  3609. 1
  3610. 1
  3611. 1
  3612. 1
  3613. 1
  3614. 1
  3615. 1
  3616. 1
  3617. 1
  3618. 1
  3619. 1
  3620. 1
  3621. 1
  3622. 1
  3623. 1
  3624. 1
  3625. 1
  3626. 1
  3627. 1
  3628. 1
  3629. 1
  3630. 1
  3631. 1
  3632. 1
  3633. 1
  3634. 1
  3635. 1
  3636. 1
  3637. 1
  3638. 1
  3639. 1
  3640. 1
  3641. 1
  3642. 1
  3643. 1
  3644. 1
  3645. 1
  3646. 1
  3647. 1
  3648. 1
  3649. 1
  3650. 1
  3651. 1
  3652. 1
  3653. 1
  3654. 1
  3655. 1
  3656. 1
  3657. 1
  3658. 1
  3659. 1
  3660. 1
  3661. 1
  3662. 1
  3663. 1
  3664. 1
  3665. 1
  3666. 1
  3667. 1
  3668. 1
  3669. 1
  3670. 1
  3671. 1
  3672. 1
  3673. 1
  3674. 1
  3675. 1
  3676. 1
  3677. 1
  3678. 1
  3679. 1
  3680. 1
  3681. 1
  3682. 1
  3683. 1
  3684. 1
  3685. 1
  3686. 1
  3687. 1
  3688. 1
  3689. 1
  3690. 1
  3691. 1
  3692. 1
  3693. 1
  3694. 1
  3695. 1
  3696. 1
  3697. 1
  3698. 1
  3699. 1
  3700. 1
  3701. 1
  3702. 1
  3703. 1
  3704. 1
  3705. 1
  3706. 1
  3707. 1
  3708. 1
  3709. 1
  3710. 1
  3711.  @pete5691  Bangladesh is indeed an Asian Tiger and they have a plan to become developed by 2041, whether they reach achieve that or not, only time will tell but they have that plan in place and are using the same East Asian economic model that is also currently being used by Vietnam (another modern Asian Tiger). It is the Asian Century and China is the most powerful nation of the Asian Century. Basing a region's worth on who migrates there is not a valid argument because it's not the same across the whole world. Asian countries (whether rich or poor) have very strict immigration policies. There is a lot of inter-regional migration within Asia and most Asian countries mostly accept temporary migrants from other Asian countries. Asia has experienced tremendous economic success, China is set to become the biggest economy by 2030, India is expected to rise to #3 by the end of this decade and Indonesia is set to rise to #4 by the middle of this century. Multiple Asian countries are competing in key sectors like space exploration (China, India, Japan), robotics (China, Japan, India, Singapore, South Korea) and AI (of which China is currently ahead of the US in multiple AI sectors). A push for de-dollarisation has gained traction in Asia and Asian soft power has also risen considerably, with South Korea now competing with the US on a global scale. The biggest song in the world right now is a song by a South Korean Kpop girl group called "Cupid", the most watched series on Netflix is a South Korean series and the most used app in the world is TikTok, a Chinese app. Idolisation and fetishisation of Korean people and culture is now common place and there are people who are getting plastic surgery to look Korean/East Asian. This level of infatuation and idolisation was only ever seen with the US but now South Korea is up there too. So yeah we are in the Asian Century.
    1
  3712. 1
  3713. 1
  3714. 1
  3715. 1
  3716. 1
  3717. 1
  3718. 1
  3719. 1
  3720. 1
  3721. 1
  3722. 1
  3723. 1
  3724. 1
  3725. 1
  3726. 1
  3727. 1
  3728. 1
  3729. 1
  3730. 1
  3731. 1
  3732. 1
  3733. 1
  3734. 1
  3735. 1
  3736. 1
  3737. 1
  3738. 1
  3739. 1
  3740. 1
  3741. 1
  3742. 1
  3743. 1
  3744. 1
  3745. 1
  3746. 1
  3747. 1
  3748. 1
  3749. 1
  3750. 1
  3751. 1
  3752. 1
  3753. 1
  3754. 1
  3755. 1
  3756. 1
  3757. 1
  3758. 1
  3759. 1
  3760. 1
  3761. 1
  3762. 1
  3763. 1
  3764. 1
  3765. 1
  3766. 1
  3767. 1
  3768. 1
  3769. 1
  3770. 1
  3771. 1
  3772. 1
  3773. 1
  3774. 1
  3775. 1
  3776. 1
  3777. 1
  3778. 1
  3779. 1
  3780. 1
  3781. 1
  3782. 1
  3783. 1
  3784. 1
  3785. 1
  3786. 1
  3787. 1
  3788. 1
  3789. 1
  3790. 1
  3791. 1
  3792. 1
  3793. 1
  3794. 1
  3795. 1
  3796. 1
  3797. 1
  3798. 1
  3799. 1
  3800. 1
  3801. 1
  3802. 1
  3803. 1
  3804. 1
  3805. 1
  3806. 1
  3807. 1
  3808. 1
  3809. 1
  3810. 1
  3811. 1
  3812. 1
  3813. 1
  3814. 1
  3815. 1
  3816. 1
  3817. 1
  3818. 1
  3819. 1
  3820. 1
  3821. 1
  3822. 1
  3823. 1
  3824. 1
  3825. 1
  3826. 1
  3827. 1
  3828. 1
  3829. 1
  3830. 1
  3831. 1
  3832. 1
  3833. 1
  3834. 1
  3835. 1
  3836. 1
  3837. 1
  3838. 1
  3839. 1
  3840. 1
  3841. 1
  3842. 1
  3843. 1
  3844. 1
  3845. 1
  3846. 1
  3847. 1
  3848. 1
  3849. 1
  3850. 1
  3851. 1
  3852. 1
  3853. 1
  3854. 1
  3855. 1
  3856. 1
  3857. 1
  3858. 1
  3859. 1
  3860. 1
  3861. 1
  3862. 1
  3863. 1
  3864. 1
  3865. 1
  3866. 1
  3867. 1
  3868. 1
  3869. 1
  3870. 1
  3871. 1
  3872. 1
  3873. 1
  3874. 1
  3875. 1
  3876. 1
  3877. 1
  3878. 1
  3879. 1
  3880. 1
  3881. 1
  3882. 1
  3883. 1
  3884. 1
  3885. 1
  3886. 1
  3887. 1
  3888. 1
  3889. 1
  3890. 1
  3891. 1
  3892. 1
  3893. 1
  3894. 1
  3895. 1
  3896. 1
  3897. 1
  3898. 1
  3899. 1
  3900. 1
  3901. 1
  3902. 1
  3903. 1
  3904. 1
  3905. 1
  3906. 1
  3907. 1
  3908. 1
  3909. 1
  3910. 1
  3911. 1
  3912. 1
  3913. 1
  3914. 1
  3915. 1
  3916. 1
  3917. 1
  3918. 1
  3919. 1
  3920. 1
  3921. 1
  3922. 1
  3923. 1
  3924. 1
  3925. 1
  3926. 1
  3927. 1
  3928. 1
  3929. 1
  3930. 1
  3931. 1
  3932. 1
  3933. 1
  3934. 1
  3935. 1
  3936. 1
  3937. 1
  3938. 1
  3939. 1
  3940. 1
  3941. 1
  3942. 1
  3943. 1
  3944. 1
  3945. 1
  3946. 1
  3947. 1
  3948. 1
  3949. 1
  3950. 1
  3951. 1
  3952. 1
  3953. 1
  3954. 1
  3955. 1
  3956. 1
  3957. 1
  3958. 1
  3959. 1
  3960. 1
  3961. 1
  3962. 1
  3963. 1
  3964. 1
  3965. 1
  3966. 1
  3967. 1
  3968. 1
  3969. 1
  3970. 1
  3971. 1
  3972. 1
  3973. 1
  3974. 1
  3975. 1
  3976. 1
  3977. 1
  3978. 1
  3979. 1
  3980. 1
  3981. 1
  3982. 1
  3983. 1
  3984. 1
  3985. 1
  3986. 1
  3987. 1
  3988. 1
  3989. 1
  3990. 1
  3991. 1
  3992. 1
  3993. 1
  3994. 1
  3995. 1
  3996. 1
  3997. 1
  3998. 1
  3999. 1
  4000. 1
  4001. 1
  4002. 1
  4003. 1
  4004. 1
  4005. 1
  4006. 1
  4007. 1
  4008. 1
  4009. 1
  4010. 1
  4011. 1
  4012. 1
  4013. 1
  4014. 1
  4015. 1
  4016. 1
  4017. 1
  4018. 1
  4019. 1
  4020. 1
  4021. 1
  4022. 1
  4023. 1
  4024. 1
  4025. 1
  4026. 1
  4027. 1
  4028. 1
  4029. 1
  4030. 1
  4031. 1
  4032. 1
  4033. 1
  4034. 1
  4035. 1
  4036. 1
  4037. 1
  4038. 1
  4039. 1
  4040. 1
  4041. 1
  4042. 1
  4043. 1
  4044. 1
  4045. 1
  4046. 1
  4047. 1
  4048. 1
  4049. 1
  4050. 1
  4051. 1
  4052. 1
  4053. 1
  4054. 1
  4055. 1
  4056. 1
  4057. 1
  4058. 1
  4059. 1
  4060. 1
  4061. 1
  4062. 1
  4063. 1
  4064. 1
  4065. 1
  4066. 1
  4067. 1
  4068. 1
  4069. 1
  4070. 1
  4071. 1
  4072. 1
  4073. 1
  4074. 1
  4075. 1
  4076. 1
  4077. 1
  4078. 1
  4079. 1
  4080. 1
  4081. 1
  4082. 1
  4083. 1
  4084. 1
  4085. 1
  4086. 1
  4087. 1
  4088. 1
  4089. 1
  4090. 1
  4091. 1
  4092. 1
  4093. 1
  4094. 1
  4095. 1
  4096. 1
  4097. 1
  4098. 1
  4099. 1
  4100. 1
  4101. 1
  4102. 1
  4103. 1
  4104. 1
  4105. 1
  4106. 1
  4107. 1
  4108. 1
  4109. 1
  4110. 1
  4111. 1
  4112. 1
  4113. 1
  4114. 1
  4115. 1
  4116. 1
  4117. 1
  4118. 1
  4119. 1
  4120. 1
  4121. 1
  4122. 1
  4123. 1
  4124. 1
  4125. 1
  4126. 1
  4127. 1
  4128. 1
  4129. 1
  4130. 1
  4131.  @jonatand2045  Democratic governments don't respect the work of the previous government, instead they decide to use their time in office to undue what the previous government did and implement their ideas of what will make their country developed. This is why countries like Malaysia (that achieved its greatest level of success under an authoritarian leader) struggle to achieve high income status because successive democratically-elected governments are corrupt and have their own ideas of development. Sri Lanka is once again a lower middle income nation because of successive democratically-elected governments that turned out to be weak and corrupt despite achieving great leaps in economic and social development under former authoritarian governments. Developing Asian countries that are democratic are subjugated and held down by bodies like the World Bank and IMF because their government is a revolving door of different presidents and prime ministers. Had China been like this, China would've achieved absolutely nothing. Democracy simply does not work in a developing Asian setting and it's a great thing that democracy never made its way to China. The fact is that the CCP is why China is what it is today and it is also the CCP that has had the ability to invest in other Asian countries at such a significant rate. A democratic China would never have been investing in so much in India's tech start-ups for example because it would never be certain if that government would remain in power or not.
    1
  4132. 1
  4133. 1
  4134. 1
  4135. 1
  4136. 1
  4137. 1
  4138. 1
  4139. 1
  4140. 1
  4141. 1
  4142. 1
  4143. 1
  4144. 1
  4145. 1
  4146. 1
  4147. 1
  4148. 1
  4149. 1
  4150. 1
  4151. 1
  4152. 1
  4153. 1
  4154. 1
  4155. 1
  4156. 1
  4157. 1
  4158. 1
  4159. 1
  4160. 1
  4161. 1
  4162. 1
  4163. 1
  4164. 1
  4165. 1
  4166. 1
  4167. 1
  4168. 1
  4169. 1
  4170. 1
  4171. 1
  4172. 1
  4173. 1
  4174. 1
  4175. 1
  4176. 1
  4177. 1
  4178. 1
  4179. 1
  4180. 1
  4181. 1
  4182. 1
  4183. 1
  4184. 1
  4185. 1
  4186. 1
  4187. 1
  4188. 1
  4189. 1
  4190. 1
  4191.  @darklord7069  We're not talking about Antifa and whatever ideas they are promoting. This video is about incels. You're deflecting because what this video has done is tell the truth. Incels have committed terror attacks, they have written manifestos encouraging violence so yes they are starting out just like Al Qaeda and IS and those jihadist groups by creating manifestos and encouraging violence. They are cut from the same cloth. One more thing, yes the British empire did "export" homophobia (at least within Asia). Indigenous Eastern religions like Hinduism, Buddhism and Shintoism had no issue with homosexuality until Christian laws were implemented (I'm Asian btw). There are stories and historical documents about bisexual kings in certain Asian countries and homosexual monks in Japan. India's kamasutra has chapters on both heterosexual and homosexual topics. Have you wondered why Thailand is more open to LGBT people than most other parts of Asia? That is because they weren't directly colonised and were only influenced by the West through treaties with European powers. Unrelated to homosexuality but even transgenderism/third gender is more accepted in Thailand (used to be accepted in other parts of Asia too). Compare the treatment of transgender women in Thailand to India and you'll see it's different. Just like Thailand, India has their own ladyboy community (who are considered semi-scared) but these days they live on the fringes and are nowhere near as accepted in Indian society compared to ladyboys in Thailand (there are famous and popular ladyboys/transgender women who are popular among straight men in Thailand). Cambodia has their own ladyboy community too but not as visible as in Thailand. That's due to the use of Christianity during colonisation. It was demonised so Asian people suddenly saw it differently and it's not outright homophobia or transphobia (like in the West), it's now "we don't talk about that" because it's taboo. We know there was no issue with any of that before colonisation but people suppressed it so they no longer talk about it.
    1
  4192. 1
  4193. 1
  4194. 1
  4195. 1
  4196. 1
  4197. 1
  4198. 1
  4199. 1
  4200. 1
  4201. 1
  4202. 1
  4203. 1
  4204. 1
  4205. 1
  4206. 1
  4207. 1
  4208. 1
  4209. 1
  4210. 1
  4211. 1
  4212. 1
  4213. 1
  4214. 1
  4215. 1
  4216. 1
  4217. 1
  4218. 1
  4219. 1
  4220. 1
  4221. 1
  4222. 1
  4223. 1
  4224. 1
  4225. 1
  4226. 1
  4227. 1
  4228. 1
  4229. 1
  4230. 1
  4231. 1
  4232. 1
  4233. 1
  4234. 1
  4235. 1
  4236. 1
  4237. 1
  4238. 1
  4239. 1
  4240. 1
  4241. 1
  4242. 1
  4243. 1
  4244. 1
  4245. 1
  4246. 1
  4247. 1
  4248. 1
  4249. 1
  4250. 1
  4251. 1
  4252. 1
  4253. 1
  4254. 1
  4255. 1
  4256. 1
  4257. 1
  4258. 1
  4259. 1
  4260. 1
  4261. 1
  4262. 1
  4263. 1
  4264. 1
  4265. 1
  4266. 1
  4267. 1
  4268. 1
  4269. 1
  4270. 1
  4271. 1
  4272. 1
  4273. 1
  4274. 1
  4275. 1
  4276. 1
  4277. 1
  4278. 1
  4279. 1
  4280. 1
  4281. 1
  4282. 1
  4283. 1
  4284. 1
  4285. 1
  4286. 1
  4287. 1
  4288.  @user-pn3im5sm7k  "You are clinging on to the past and fail to see the divide of Japan in 2022 and 1941" There is a stark difference between the Japan of 2022 and the Japan of 1941 but the country still doesn't accept reality. Right wing Japanese people still believe they did the right thing by invading Japan. They deride conversations about comfort women and the Nanjing massacre and continue to claim that South Asian and Southeast Asian countries like Vietnam, India, Indonesia and Malaysia are only independent from Europeans because of them. As a result, they believe they did the right thing by invading and subjugating the region. Their aim was to never free Asia from the Europeans. "This sentiment is of course an anti-Japanese propaganda technique used by Chinese propagandists, which radiates throughout your entire comment" I'm not Chinese and this is NOT anti-Japanese propaganda. You just fetishise Japan and so can never see things from my perspective. This is why you think anybody that says anything remotely critical of Japan is a Chinese propagandist. You don't know enough about the Yasukuni Shrine. It's so wrong for an American man to undermine reality around these events. That shrine houses the Yushukan, a museum rife with Imperial Japanese pan-Asian propaganda including maps of Greater East Asia and walls with a huge map suggesting South Asia and Southeast Asia were freed from the Europeans by the Japanese. That whole museum takes part in historical revisionism. You aren't even allowed to take photos of the content within the Main Sanctuary. Now why would that be the case? Oh that's right because the whole museum is used to justify and undermine the atrocities committed during WW2. One thing that tires me is how White Americans idolise Japan to such a great extent whilst calling out China but not realising that modern China is using the same tactics that Imperial Japan used in WW2. Had you had any idea of reality in the Indo-Pacific today, you'd know that China is using the same pan-Asian vocabulary the Japanese did "Asia for Asians". You idolise Japan but fail to realise that Japan's revisionism of WW2 history is incredibly problematic. I don't hate Japan but I'm not infatuated with it like many White Americans. I have the ability to admire the good qualities of Japan but also be critical of it too. I don't hark on about Japan's past like this usually but seeing Americans blindly support Japan and undermine WW2 reality is lowkey irritating because it comes off with that "holier than thou" and fetishistic mentality. If you were able to read my comment, you'd realise I called out China and its expansionism but because of your fetishisation of Japan, you didn't see that. Of course you're in the US military and of course you're advocating for the militarisation of Asia. Why am I not surprised? The US and China's cold war is going to destroy Asia and the Pacific. I'm so tired of this war mongering. We're always getting caught up in the drama that the US and China create. Constantly asked to pick sides. Please give us a break seriously. When my generation reaches our middle aged years, we want to be living in relative peace not fighting wars started by men in foreign nations decades ago and not realising if our future children (our parents' future grandchildren) will survive. I say this quite boldly, but many people of all ages (young to old) across various parts of the Indo-Pacific do not want war, whether that's a fully blown war or proxy wars. The blatant warmongering has made people very tired.
    1
  4289. 1
  4290. 1
  4291.  @AngryKittens  Yes you are absolutely correct correct but Indo-European is a language family, it's not a race. Race is a social construct anyway. There are "East Asian" looking people in South Asia whose native language is Indo-European. There are "South Asian" looking people in South Asia and Myanmar who speak Sino-Tibetan languages. In the case of South Asia, this does not make sense. I know what you're talking about, you're talking about the Steppe pastoralists who brought Indo-European languages and understand what you're saying but the case of South Asia is very different because miscegenation has occurred ever since the first humans settled in the region. I wouldn't call it "Indo-European" either but Steppe ancestry. Dravidian speakers are not the first inhabitants of South Asia. They seem to have emerged from the IVC. The first inhabitants of South Asia are the AASI and they are related to East Asians, Southeast Asians and Aboriginal Australians. It's tribal groups in South Asia that have the highest levels of this AASI ancestry out of all South Asians, not the large Dravidian-speaking groups (Tamils, Telugu etc.). The AASI emerged from one of the earliest waves of humans out of Africa. This ancestral Asian population settled in South Asia and genetically split into three populations: AASI, ESEA of E/SE Asia and AA of Australasia. All of these groups are related to one another and consequently share varying degrees of affinity to an early modern human known as Tianyuan Man. Source: "A genetic history of migration, diversification, and admixture in Asia" - Melinda A. Yang, 2022 Nagas are like other South Asians. Everybody is a descendant of various migrations into the region that mixed together. The dominant ancestral component of the Nagas is known as Ancestral Tibeto-Burman (ATB), while small amounts of their DNA comes from mainland India much like the Meitei and Chakma. What I was trying to say is that not all South Asians speak Indo-European languages and genetically, the "Indo-European" component you speak of (which I call Steppe ancestry) is not the dominant component of any South Asian population that speaks an Indo-European language. The dominant ancestral component of most South Asians is Indus Valley Civilisation (IVC)-related ancestry, which is older than Steppe ancestry. IVC ancestry is predominantly made up of West Eurasian Neolithic farmer ancestry from what is now known as Iran (87%) with smaller amounts of Southeast Asian hunter-gatherer ancestry (13%) - related to that first wave f humans out of Africa. Source: "An Ancient Harappan Genome Lacks Ancestry from Steppe Pastoralists or Iranian Farmers" - Vasant Shinde et al. 2019 The IVC is also suggested to be the home of Dravidian languages. Yes, the case of Singapore is like any other area after the Era of Exploration, yes most Singaporeans speak an Indo-European language despite ethnically being Chinese, Malay, Tamil etc.
    1
  4292.  @AngryKittens  They are Asians because they're from Asia. They're native to Asia. That is all. There is nothing more to it. Asian is not a "race" or "genetic grouping" and people need to stop equating a basic demonym term for describe natives of a continent with a so-called race. Nobody in Asia thinks "Asian" is some sort of race. You're conflating genetic terminology like "West Eurasian" or "ESEA" with geographical terms like "Asian". Steppe pastoralist is literally the name used for Proto-Indo-Europeans. You can read the genetic studies that use this term. IVC is likely linked to Dravidian languages but we do not know for sure and the genetic studies I have given you explain this very clearly. I really can't agree with your decision to equate language families to genetics with such a narrow definition and claim genetics is mostly defined in this way. Most Burmese are of Bamar descent who speak Burmese (a Sino-Tibetan language) but are genetically mostly made up of an ancestral Southeast Asian genetic component. Kinh Vietnamese, on the other hand, are genetically closer to southern Chinese than Bamar people are on a PCA. A lot of generalisations and simplifications are going on here. Broadly speaking, East Asian and Southeast Asian people are genetically overlap with each other and understandably so because the dominant genetic component of both groups is ESEA ancestry. The DNA that came with the introduction of language families is not the prime way one separates groups of people based on genetics. There is a lot, lot more to human genetic makeup than the ancient ancestors that introduced languages to various parts of the world.
    1
  4293.  @AngryKittens  Sorry but it's not a vague term, it's the actual term used in academics. Everybody is termed based on position in human evolution: pastoralists, hunter-gatherers, farmers etc. There is nothing vague about it. So, for example, when geneticists describe the genetic landscape of South Asia, they will say South Asians are descendants of indigenous ancient hunter-gatherers known as AASI and subsequent waves of exogenous Neolithic farmers, Steppe pastoralists and/or Austroasiatic-speaking and Tibeto-Burman-speaking farmers. These terms are used to illustrate the type of technology that developed within a civilisation over time. So, for example, with rice cultivation in South Asia we know that rice was cultivated in the IVC because that was a farmer-based society and we know that Austroasiatic speaking farmers who settled in South Asia from the east also brought agrarian practices with them, introducing a new form of rice cultivation to the region. Same thing with Steppe pastoralists and the AASI were obviously less developed, due to their early origins, having been a hunter-gatherer-based society. Well Islander Southeast Asians are close to East Asians genetically. The idea that they're far apart is incorrect. It is generally understood that Austroasiatic-speaking farmers were present across a much larger land coverage of Southeast Asia (all the way into western Indonesia) and genetically speaking, Island Southeast Asians are close to East Asians. Both groups carry Basal East Asian DNA. This is why among all groups in Asia and the Pacific that carry some degree of East Eurasian/Eastern Non-African DNA, it is the ESEA (East/Southeast Asian) groups and Native Americans (who predominantly descend from a Basal East Asian lineage) that have the highest genetic affinity to Tianyuan Man (a Basal East Asian from northern China). If you look at all of the other groups in the world that have affinity to Tianyuan Man (Australians, Melanesians, South Asians, Central Asians, Maori, Romani), they are further away in genetic distance. So this idea that Islander Southeast Asians are not closely related to East Asians is incorrect. We already know, from studies dating back decades, that East and Southeast Asians are closely related. Both regions are in proximity to each other and it's understandable that genetic influence from various groups associated with East Asian-related DNA, would have impacted Island Southeast Asia to a great extent unlike Polynesia which is further away. Yes there is a genetic connection between Island Southeast Asians and Austronesian-speakers in the Pacific but that doesn't erase the fact that the closest genetic relation these populations have is with the rest of Southeast Asia and East Asia. All of these populations carry Basal East Asian DNA. Polynesians and Micronesians are also part of this same lineage albeit having split earlier. They're all descendants of ESEA aka East Asian-related lineages. Same thing with Indo-European-speaking South Asians, they all have Steppe ancestry but their dominant genetic component is IVC ancestry which is why they're comparatively closer to Iranian-speaking populations of Central and West Asia than to Europeans on a PCA plot.
    1
  4294.  @AngryKittens  Some shorten it "Steppe pastoralists", others say "Western Steppe Herders" or "Western Steppe Pastoralists". Surely, you understand what I mean now. "You arbitrarily differentiated Western Steppe Pastoralists with the ancestors of the Indo-Aryan migrations" I absolutely did not do such a thing. When did I say Iranian-speakers reached the IVC???? Huh?? Please read what I said again and read the sources I have given you. I am talking about Iranian Neolithic Farmers. They are Neolithic-era farmers that originated in Iran long before the arrival of the Steppe pastoralists to South Asia. The Iranian Neolithic Farmers are NOT the same as the Steppe pastoralists. They are called "Iranian Neolithic Farmers" because they originated in what is now Iran, some say "Zagros" instead of "Iranian" because it conflates it with modern Iranian people who are of Steppe origin. The IVC was formed from Neolithic Farmers from Iran and hunter-gatherers from Southeast Asia. Read the genetic study I gave you in my other comment. That genetic study was the biggest genetic study done on the IVC and explained one of the main origins for modern South Asians. Idk why you think North Indians don't carry IVC ancestry. They do and they carry it at a high rate. They look the way they do because of that IVC ancestry, those with less IVC ancestry and more Steppe ancestry like in Kashmir look very different and more like the Tajiks. Idk if you're just using different terminology or something but Basal Asians are not any modern East Asian or Southeast Asian group or what you're talking about. Basal Asian DNA is connected to what is known as Eastern Non-African (ENA) and today, that ancestry is detected at the highest level among tribal groups found only in South Asia and Southeast Asia like the various Negrito tribes that retain archaic ancestry due to isolation. Source: "Genetic Connections and Convergent Evolution of Tropical Indigenous Peoples in Asia" - Lian Deng et al., 2021 - this genetic paper discusses Basal Asian DNA and also includes a map of the prevalence of Basal Asian DNA in modern Asia. I totally understand your sentiment about smaller groups being erased but I think we're coming at this from two different angles which is why there is disagreement in some areas of what we're talking about.
    1
  4295.  @AngryKittens  The reality for most North Indians is that their main genetic base is not Steppe ancestry. Many love to hype up their claims of proximity to Europeans while deriding Adivasi tribals and low caste Indians who are comparatively closer to eastern Asian populations. Only the northwestern populations like Punjabis, Kashmiris and various groups in that region have a dominant base of Steppe ancestry. The rest of North India is largely a blend of IVC and Steppe ancestry. They idolise sharp (Eurocentric) features like high bridged nose whilst deriding neotenous features (flat noses, flat face etc.) and this is why you shouldn't be generalising to begin with. By generalising the whole of South Asia through the eyes of North India you're suggesting the default for South Asia is North Indian Indo-European-speaking people (which is literally what North Indian nationalists claim to be reality) and that's not reality. If there was any sort of "default" population then it would be the Adivasi tribes (dark skinned people with flat noses, flat faces etc.) found across South Asia from south India to Bhutan. If you're suggesting North Indians to be specific are the closest cousins of Europeans, that is not true. It's actually West Asians who are the closest cousins to Europeans. Both groups are of basal West Eurasian origin. Yeah Basal Asian is basically that large ancestral population that gave rise to the ESEA, AA and AASI populations of East, Southeast, South, Central Asia, the Pacific and Americas. It's ancient and their strongest affinity in modern humans is in various parts of South Asia, Island Southeast Asia and Australasia (especially Papua New Guinea). I agree with everything you're saying about Austronesian-speaking peoples but that does not change the fact that Island SEA populations don't share strong genetic ties with East Asia. I don't understand why you're focusing so much on the concept of "Asian" as understood by Americans. Nobody in Asia thinks of "Asian" as a race or something. It's just a demonym and a secondary thought for people that are actually living in Asia. So why should it matter what Americans think when they're not the ones living in Asia and are not aware of the serious cultural and genetic overlap that Asian populations share with other continents? In the US, they transformed "Asian" into some sort of racial, pan-ethnicity, pan-cultural identity due to racial politics. Asian, in its most basic and original form, is just a demonym and at its greatest extent it's just a cultural term. Why do I say it's cultural because Imperial Japan used "Asian" in a cultural context to refer to the areas of Asia culturally influenced by Indian and Chinese culture. This is why Japan tried to create Greater East Asia, a concept rooted in their own historical idea of Asia known as "Sangoku" (Three Kingdoms of China, India and Japan). Additionally, the whole concept of pan-Asianism has been rooted in culture (take for example Lee Kuan Yew's Asian Values ideology). The term, "Asian" has never been associated with genetics or appearance in the way it has been altered to mean in the US and other countries outside of Asia. The US has its own terminology because everything is centred around "race". It's the way things are for them.
    1
  4296. 1
  4297. 1
  4298. 1
  4299. 1
  4300. 1
  4301. 1
  4302. 1
  4303. 1
  4304. 1
  4305. Buddhism, Hinduism and other Eastern religions are deeply intertwined. The prevalence of Hindu-derived deity worship in various parts of Buddhist Asia is because of the Hindu influence. Phra Phrom (Thai depiction of Brahma) as featured in the video at 10:52 cannot be tied to Buddhism but more broadly to the general Dharmic/Indic culture that exists in Thailand. Thai people also popularly worship Ganesha, a deity that does not exist in Buddhist cosmology and Thai people also visit Hindu temples in Thailand. Some of the largest Ganesha statues outside of India are located in Thailand. Phra Phrom in Thai-style is also worshipped by ethnic Chinese across Southeast Asia and southern China. In Hong Kong, there is a famous Phra Phrom statue that is frequented by Chinese people. In Japan, there are Japanese versions of Ganesha, Shiva and Skanda and in Sri Lanka, you will find Buddhist people worshipping local folk gods as well as Hindu gods inside some Buddhist temples like Seema Malaka. The same thing applies to other Buddhist groups in Asia. So correlating it to Buddhism is incorrect because some of these devas don't even exist in Buddhism. The reason people worship them in Asia is because of the pre-existing Hindu influence and the general overlap that Eastern religions share with one another. Thailand was previously a Hindu nation, these Hindu practices were simply carried over after Theravada Buddhism was brought to the country from Sri Lanka. There is no restriction to how people must practice Buddhism, Hinduism, Taoism, Shintoism etc. so people mix them together.
    1
  4306. 1
  4307. Buddhism, Hinduism and other Eastern religions are deeply intertwined. The prevalence of Hindu-derived deity worship in various parts of Buddhist Asia is because of the Hindu influence. Phra Phrom (Thai depiction of Brahma) as featured in the video at 10:52 cannot be tied to Buddhism but more broadly to the general Dharmic/Indic culture that exists in Thailand. Thai people also popularly worship Ganesha, a deity that does not exist in Buddhist cosmology and Thai people also visit Hindu temples in Thailand. Some of the largest Ganesha statues outside of India are located in Thailand. Phra Phrom in Thai-style is also worshipped by ethnic Chinese across Southeast Asia and southern China. In Hong Kong, there is a famous Phra Phrom statue that is frequented by Chinese people. In Japan, there are Japanese versions of Ganesha, Shiva and Skanda and in Sri Lanka, you will find Buddhist people worshipping local folk gods as well as Hindu gods inside some Buddhist temples like Seema Malaka. The same thing applies to other Buddhist groups in Asia. So correlating it to Buddhism is incorrect because some of these devas don't even exist in Buddhism. The reason people worship them in Asia is because of the pre-existing Hindu influence and the general overlap that Eastern religions share with one another. Thailand was previously a Hindu nation, these Hindu practices were simply carried over after Theravada Buddhism was brought to the country from Sri Lanka. There is no restriction to how people must practice Buddhism, Hinduism, Taoism, Shintoism etc. so people mix them together.
    1
  4308. 1
  4309. 1
  4310. 1
  4311. 1
  4312. 1
  4313. 1
  4314. 1
  4315. 1
  4316. 1
  4317. 1
  4318. 1
  4319. 1
  4320. 1
  4321. 1
  4322. 1
  4323. 1
  4324. 1
  4325.  @雷-t3j  Global South is in reference to the developing world (composed of middle income and low income nations - consists of most of Asia, most of Africa, most of Latin America, the Pacific and parts of Eastern Europe). Global North refers to the developed world (composed of high income nations - the definition is subjective but always includes Western Europe, Canada, the US, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, South Korea, Singapore and Israel). In the case of IP waiving, it was the governments of developed Western nations, Japan, Singapore and a few others that refused to waive IP. Most of the governments of the developing world supported the temporary waiving of IP. The current war in Ukraine has also exacerbated the divide between Global North and Global South. All Global North nations have supported sanctions against Russia, whereas the Global South hasn't. Unfortunately, this is the result of the Cold War where Russia (Soviet Union) was sympathetic and supportive of struggles in the Global South whereas the Global North (led by the US) was not. Many in the Global South fear that picking a side in the war will result in consequences. They fear that siding with the US will ruin their relationship with Russia and thus they will have nobody to support them in their own struggles. They also fear that picking a side will open their countries up to proxy wars and become pawns between the US and Russia like what has happened to Ukraine (also based on their past experiences, the conflicts of the Cold War era backed by either the US or the USSR were fought in Global South nations).
    1
  4326. 1
  4327. 1
  4328. 1
  4329. 1
  4330. 1
  4331. 1
  4332. 1
  4333. 1
  4334. 1
  4335. 1
  4336. 1
  4337. 1
  4338. 1
  4339. 1
  4340. 1
  4341. 1
  4342. 1
  4343. 1
  4344. 1
  4345. 1
  4346. 1
  4347. 1
  4348. 1
  4349. 1
  4350. 1
  4351. 1
  4352. 1
  4353. 1
  4354. 1
  4355. 1
  4356. 1
  4357. 1
  4358. 1
  4359. 1
  4360. 1
  4361. 1
  4362. 1
  4363. 1
  4364. 1
  4365. 1
  4366. 1
  4367. 1
  4368. 1
  4369. 1
  4370. 1
  4371. 1
  4372. 1
  4373. 1
  4374. 1
  4375. 1
  4376. 1
  4377. 1
  4378. 1
  4379. 1
  4380. 1
  4381. 1
  4382. 1
  4383. 1
  4384. 1
  4385. 1
  4386. 1
  4387. 1
  4388. 1
  4389. 1
  4390. 1
  4391. 1
  4392. 1
  4393. 1
  4394. 1
  4395. 1
  4396. 1
  4397. 1
  4398. 1
  4399. 1
  4400. 1
  4401. 1
  4402. 1
  4403. 1
  4404. 1
  4405. 1
  4406. 1
  4407. 1
  4408. 1
  4409. 1
  4410. 1
  4411. 1
  4412. 1
  4413. 1
  4414. 1
  4415. 1
  4416. 1
  4417. 1
  4418. 1
  4419. 1
  4420. 1
  4421. 1
  4422. 1
  4423. 1
  4424. 1
  4425. 1
  4426. 1
  4427. 1
  4428. 1
  4429. 1
  4430. 1
  4431. 1
  4432. 1
  4433. 1
  4434. 1
  4435. 1
  4436. 1
  4437. 1
  4438. 1
  4439. 1
  4440. 1
  4441. 1
  4442. 1
  4443. 1
  4444. 1
  4445. 1
  4446. 1
  4447. 1
  4448. 1
  4449. 1
  4450. 1
  4451. 1
  4452. 1
  4453. 1
  4454. 1
  4455. 1
  4456. 1
  4457. 1
  4458. 1
  4459. 1
  4460. 1
  4461. 1
  4462. 1
  4463. 1
  4464. 1
  4465. 1
  4466. 1
  4467. 1
  4468. 1
  4469. 1
  4470. 1
  4471. 1
  4472. 1
  4473. 1
  4474. 1
  4475. 1
  4476. 1
  4477. 1
  4478. 1
  4479. 1
  4480. 1
  4481. 1
  4482. 1
  4483. 1
  4484. 1
  4485. 1
  4486. 1
  4487. 1
  4488. 1
  4489. 1
  4490. 1
  4491.  @csaww  I think the reason why they could never communicate is because they never had any rights after the Burmese military stripped them off their citizenship. What exactly could they do? They didn't have access to anything and then they faced genocide in 2017. They are not to blame and that does not mean they are any less Burmese than the Bamar that live in Yangon or elsewhere. The parents still identify as Burmese hence why they even want to teach their kids how to speak the language and sing the national anthem. Myanmar is a nation that is riddled with ethnic strife, it stands out compared to other ethnically divided nations in Asia in that Myanmar is very much like Asia's Yugoslavia. Minority groups in Myanmar have always faced persecution from the majority and suggesting that to be Burmese is to be able to speak the language is not right. All of their lands are within the boundaries of present-day Myanmar they are Burmese through that fact not because they know how to speak Burmese, the native language of the Bamar who are not native to Rakhine State. Rakhine, Mon, Rohingya, Karen, Kachin, Shan, Wa etc. etc. are all Burmese people. They are not the same as the Bamar and they are all different to one another but they are all Burmese. The Tatmadaw has never accepted this though and they have always wanted to Burmanise Myanmar but unlike China's successful Sinicisation policy, Myanmar's Burmanisation policy has always failed. The only hope left in that country are the Gen Z Burmese of varied backgrounds, including Bamar, who are fighting for real change, forming their own militias against the Tatmadaw. Those young Bamar have a different mindset. They have lived with freedom for 10 years and are more accepting of minority groups after seeing their lives turn upside down because of the coup. I know Myanmar can become better if they succeed.
    1
  4492. 1
  4493. 1
  4494. 1
  4495. 1
  4496. 1
  4497. 1
  4498. 1
  4499. 1
  4500. 1
  4501. 1
  4502. 1
  4503. 1
  4504. 1
  4505. 1
  4506. 1
  4507. 1
  4508. 1
  4509. 1
  4510. 1
  4511. 1
  4512. 1
  4513. 1
  4514. 1
  4515. 1
  4516. 1
  4517. 1
  4518. 1
  4519. 1
  4520. 1
  4521. 1
  4522. 1
  4523. 1
  4524. 1
  4525.  @travellersagar437  It's the fault of the Indian government. If they didn't allow huge religious festival to go ahead and didn't encourage people to come out in record numbers to vote or naively claim that the pandemic was over in India then this wouldn't have happened. The government became complacent and led to this. Now, the government is trying to silence people who criticise it, in fact they're trying to silence people who don't even live in India. I can't understand how you can sit here and tell me India is doing well and defend the Indian government. The Indian government has ruined everything. Think about the long term damage the Indian government is going to do India and the rest of the world. There are countries that now have to suspend their vaccination program because India can't make vaccines for export anymore. How is India supposed to develop its economy? Look at what's happening to the country. The virus is now spreading to the rural side, something they managed to prevent last year. India once had the largest middle class in the world but because the Indian government couldn't control the pandemic, the Indian middle class lost 32 million people. That's 32 million people back into some form of poverty. The way things are going, as they said, India could very well be sent back 20 years. Imagine, all of the things that India acquired over those 20 years, gone. Totally gone and that's because the Indian government, its supporters and other people became way too complacent even though cases were still at 9,000, 8000 etc. at the start of the year.
    1
  4526.  @travellersagar437  1. You think everybody that went to Kumbh Mela lives in Uttarakhand? How funny. Also, no Uttarakhand does not have the lowest amount of cases. Yes it's low but not as a low as what is found in some other states. 2. Yes I know each state has their own government and I know that much of what is happening is centred on a select few states that have the most cases as opposed to some others like Himachal Pradesh, Goa or Northeast Indian states. 3. Well, I have to disagree here. Modi did not do a good job in controlling the virus. His national lockdown wasn't executed properly and that meant migrant workers were stranded as soon as it was announced. His focus on minorities instead of the pressing issue of COVID-19 is the reason why this has all happened and now because of Modi and the Indian government, the virus is spreading widely in Nepal after the Indian variant was detected in the country and Nepalese people came back from Kumbh Mela. So no, Modi did not control the virus. India did relatively good during the first wave in relation to its population but everything came undone because of complacency. It's so sad to see and I don't know how people can still support Modi when he cares more about saving face by silencing critics than helping the population. The very fact that his government instructed an Australian newspaper to amend details about him in an article that critcised his handling of the virus speaks volumes to the type of person that man is. The Indian government is a complete failure and the whole world knows it. Trust me, the Indian government is no different to the incompetent governments that exist in other countries. They're all cut from the same cloth and it's this reason why India hasn't progressed in recent years. Truly sad to see.
    1
  4527. 1
  4528. 1
  4529. 1
  4530. 1
  4531. 1
  4532. 1
  4533. 1
  4534. 1
  4535. 1
  4536. 1
  4537. 1
  4538. 1
  4539. 1
  4540. 1
  4541. 1
  4542. 1
  4543. 1
  4544. 1
  4545. 1
  4546. 1
  4547. 1
  4548. 1
  4549. 1
  4550. 1
  4551. 1
  4552. 1
  4553. 1
  4554. 1
  4555. 1
  4556. 1
  4557. 1
  4558. 1
  4559. 1
  4560. 1
  4561. 1
  4562. 1
  4563. 1
  4564. 1
  4565. 1
  4566. 1
  4567. 1
  4568. 1
  4569. 1
  4570. 1
  4571. 1
  4572. 1
  4573. 1
  4574. 1
  4575. 1
  4576. 1
  4577. 1
  4578. 1
  4579. 1
  4580. 1
  4581. 1
  4582. 1
  4583. 1
  4584. 1
  4585. 1
  4586. 1
  4587. 1
  4588. 1
  4589. 1
  4590. 1
  4591. 1
  4592. 1
  4593. 1
  4594. 1
  4595. 1
  4596. 1
  4597. 1
  4598. 1
  4599. 1
  4600. 1
  4601. 1
  4602. 1
  4603. 1
  4604. 1
  4605. 1
  4606. 1
  4607. 1
  4608. 1
  4609. 1
  4610. 1
  4611. 1
  4612. 1
  4613. 1
  4614. 1
  4615. 1
  4616. 1
  4617. 1
  4618. 1
  4619. 1
  4620. 1
  4621. 1
  4622. 1
  4623. 1
  4624. 1
  4625. 1
  4626. 1
  4627. 1
  4628. 1
  4629. 1
  4630. 1
  4631. 1
  4632. 1
  4633. 1
  4634. 1
  4635. 1
  4636. 1
  4637. 1
  4638. 1
  4639. 1
  4640. 1
  4641. 1
  4642.  @Gizziiusa  There is a difference between economic clout and political clout. It would be seen as detrimental to many ethnic Chinese in countries like Thailand, Philippines, Laos and Cambodia to be treated as PRC Chinese and thus viewed as outsiders. The ethnic Chinese communities of all Thailand, Philippines and Cambodia are deeply assimilated into their respective countries. Ethnic Chinese in Thailand and Cambodia practice Thai and Khmer culture, speak Thai and Khmer practice Theravada Buddhism and see themselves as "Thai" and "Khmer". The same thing in the Philippines, ethnic Chinese in the Philippines are embedded within the native Filipino culture with most practicing Catholicism and speaking the native Filipino languages. Malaysia is the only exception, where the local Chinese community has retained its Chinese cultural heritage albeit developed it into a unique Southeast Asian-style Chinese identity with some additional influences from the Malay and Indian communities but nonetheless, culturally and ethnically consider themselves as "Han Chinese". Due to Malaysia's long history of ethnic disharmony, there is a large fraction of the Malaysian Chinese community who find more allegiance with China than with Malaysia and this section of the community are constantly questioned about their loyalty with fears that if relations between Malaysia and China deteriorated considerably, this section of the Chinese community would immediately side with China rather than their birth country.
    1
  4643. 1
  4644. 1
  4645. 1
  4646. 1
  4647. 1
  4648. 1
  4649. 1
  4650. 1
  4651. 1
  4652. 1
  4653. 1
  4654. 1
  4655. 1
  4656. 1
  4657. 1
  4658. 1
  4659. 1
  4660. 1
  4661. 1
  4662. 1
  4663. 1
  4664. 1
  4665. 1
  4666. 1
  4667. 1
  4668. 1
  4669. 1
  4670. 1
  4671. 1
  4672. 1
  4673. 1
  4674. 1
  4675. 1
  4676. 1
  4677. 1
  4678. 1
  4679. 1
  4680. 1
  4681. 1
  4682. 1
  4683. 1
  4684. 1
  4685. 1
  4686. 1
  4687. 1
  4688. 1
  4689. 1
  4690. 1
  4691. 1
  4692. 1
  4693. 1
  4694. 1
  4695. 1
  4696. 1
  4697. 1
  4698. 1
  4699. 1
  4700. 1
  4701. 1
  4702. 1
  4703. 1
  4704. 1
  4705. 1
  4706. 1
  4707. 1
  4708. 1
  4709. 1
  4710. 1
  4711. 1
  4712. 1
  4713. 1
  4714. 1
  4715. 1
  4716. 1
  4717. ​ @Homer-OJ-Simpson  If Australia's foreign policy was more similar to Asian nations, then it would be rather different and more similar to say Australia's northern neighbour, Indonesia. It would be able to stand on its own. The country would sit in the middle, maintaining cordial relations between both the US and China without feeling the need to pick a side. Cultural and historical ties have traditionally meant Australia has ignored Asia and looked to the US and UK. This is why Pine Gap (US military base) exists in Australia, it's not a response to China. China's rise and expansionism is only something recent. Australia always pursued closer ties with the US. So it was inevitable that with the rise of the US military, particularly after WW2, that the country would ally itself with the US. It was the expected thing to do for a Western country at the time. Going neutral like Asia and Africa did would have been unimaginable and still is. It's only since the late 2000s/2010s that Australia really began engaging more with Asia and recognising its geography. It sees itself as both a Western nation and an Asia-Pacific nation (we are taught this in school) and has integrated itself into the region in areas ranging from politics to culture such as the Asian Football Confederation and the RCEP. Controversial remarks made by Asian leaders of yesteryear like Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew were always haunting reminders for the dominant White Australian government of what could become of the country if it continued to ignore its geography and present itself as "white only" (the White Australia Policy was only abolished in 1973 and its native population are Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders). On top of that, ever since colonisation, the perceived "Asian threat" has always existed (a fear that Asian migration or invasion would result in the country becoming "Asian"). The fear first began with the migration of Chinese, Sri Lankan, Malay, Japanese Malay pearl divers during the colonial era, it became particularly prevalent during WW2 amid fear that Australia would be colonised by Japan and its most recent incarnation is in the form of China's rise and expansionism. It's also a theme that appears in Australian pop culture. The truth is if Australia's foreign policy was more independent and not dependent on other nations (in this case the US), Australia wouldn't have been so caught up in all of this. This is why Australia is diversifying and building better ties with Southeast Asian countries and India, engaging further in the Pacific, fixing its ties with China and continuing to build its ties (particularly in the area of defence) with the US. It has recognised its nature as both a Western and Asia-Pacific nation.
    1
  4718. 1
  4719. 1
  4720. 1
  4721. 1
  4722. 1
  4723. 1
  4724. 1
  4725. 1
  4726. 1
  4727. 1
  4728. 1
  4729. 1
  4730. 1
  4731. 1
  4732. 1
  4733. 1
  4734. 1
  4735. 1
  4736. 1
  4737. 1
  4738. 1
  4739. 1
  4740. 1
  4741. 1
  4742. 1
  4743. 1
  4744. 1
  4745. 1
  4746. 1
  4747. 1
  4748. 1
  4749. 1
  4750. 1
  4751. 1
  4752. 1
  4753. 1
  4754. 1
  4755. 1
  4756. 1
  4757. 1
  4758. 1
  4759. 1
  4760. 1
  4761. 1
  4762. 1
  4763. 1
  4764. 1
  4765. 1
  4766. 1
  4767. 1
  4768. 1
  4769. 1
  4770. 1
  4771. 1
  4772. 1
  4773. 1
  4774. 1
  4775. 1
  4776. 1
  4777. 1
  4778. 1
  4779. 1
  4780. 1
  4781. 1
  4782. 1
  4783. 1
  4784. 1
  4785.  @overworlder  Japan and South Korea are NOT part of the West. If you believe they are part of the West, then you don't understand what the West is. Just because they are politically aligned with Euro-America, does not mean they are Western. I know y'all really fantasise about Japan and South Korea but Japan and South Korea are Asian and Sinosphere nations, they have more in common with other Chinese-influenced Asian nations like China and Vietnam. Broadly speaking, they are culturally Eastern. Their mentality, cultural habits and essence are completely Asiatic. There is a reason why Japan and South Korea (like all other Asian nations - Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, Maldives) prefer hiring migrant workers and skilled workers from other parts of Asia and not from anywhere outside of it. If they were truly Western like you claim them to be then how come the largest migrant groups in Japan and South Korea come from countries like China, Vietnam, Philippines and Nepal? Would they not prefer Westerners over other Asians? Japan and South Korea are definitely Asian and not Western. You said other Asian nations are part of the West too but no, Singapore is also Asian too. They have a lot of Western influences but the overall influences from the Chinese, Malay and Indian cultures dominates the entire nation's state of mind. So it's culturally Eastern just like Japan and South Korea. Singapore is the country after all that gave birth to the modern "Asian values" ideology in the 1990s (an ideology that also generated interest in East Asia).
    1
  4786. 1
  4787. 1
  4788. 1
  4789. 1
  4790. 1
  4791. 1
  4792. 1
  4793. 1
  4794. 1
  4795. 1
  4796. 1
  4797. 1
  4798. 1
  4799.  @DMS-pq8  The Onge people who belong to the broader group of Andamanese tribes, are genetically closest to other Negrito populations, particularly those in Malaysia but also in other parts of Southeast Asia such as the Philippines. All of these populations resemble one another. The Onge share strong genetic affinity towards East and Southeast Asians such as Burmese and Chinese (via ESEA ancestry which contributed to the formation of modern East and Southeast Asians) and also share genetic affinity to South Asians such as the Indians (via AASI ancestry, which is related to Onge DNA and contributed to the formation of modern South Asians) and Melanesians and Aboriginal Australians (via Australasian ancestry which contributed to the formation of Melanesians and Aboriginals). ESEA, AASI and AA ancestry are all closely related to one another and are part of the East Eurasian lineage. All of these ancestral components also have some degree of basal East Asian ancestry (whether fully or partially) which is related to Tianyuan Man, an early modern human of East Eurasian origin and part of the ESEA lineage. This is why East, Southeast and South Asians (including the Onge and other Andamanese) as well as Melanesians have varying degrees of genetic affinity to Tianyuan Man, with East and Southeast Asians having the strongest affinity to Tianyuan Man. The Onge and other Andamanese tribes are an ancient and crucial population in understanding the formation of most modern Asian and Pacific populations because they are one of the earliest populations to form from the first wave of humans out of Africa and into East and South Asia.
    1
  4800. 1
  4801. 1
  4802. 1
  4803. 1
  4804. 1
  4805. 1
  4806. 1
  4807. 1
  4808. 1
  4809. 1
  4810. 1
  4811. 1
  4812. 1
  4813. 1
  4814. 1
  4815. 1
  4816. 1
  4817. 1
  4818. 1
  4819. 1
  4820. 1
  4821. 1
  4822. 1
  4823. 1
  4824. 1
  4825. 1
  4826. 1
  4827. 1
  4828. 1
  4829. 1
  4830. 1
  4831. 1
  4832. 1
  4833. 1
  4834. 1
  4835. 1
  4836. 1
  4837. 1
  4838. 1
  4839. 1
  4840. 1
  4841. 1
  4842. 1
  4843. 1
  4844. 1
  4845. 1
  4846. 1
  4847. 1
  4848. 1
  4849. 1
  4850. 1
  4851. 1
  4852. 1
  4853. 1
  4854. 1
  4855. 1
  4856. 1
  4857. 1
  4858. 1
  4859. 1
  4860. 1
  4861. 1
  4862. 1
  4863. 1
  4864. 1
  4865. 1
  4866. 1
  4867. 1
  4868. 1
  4869. 1
  4870. 1
  4871. 1
  4872. 1
  4873. 1
  4874. 1
  4875. 1
  4876. 1
  4877. 1
  4878. 1
  4879. 1
  4880. 1
  4881. 1
  4882. 1
  4883. 1
  4884. 1
  4885. 1
  4886. 1
  4887. 1
  4888. 1
  4889. 1
  4890. 1
  4891. 1
  4892. 1
  4893. 1
  4894. 1
  4895. 1
  4896. 1
  4897. 1
  4898. 1
  4899. 1
  4900. 1
  4901. 1
  4902. 1
  4903. 1
  4904. 1
  4905. 1
  4906. 1
  4907. 1
  4908. 1
  4909. 1
  4910. 1
  4911. 1
  4912. 1
  4913. 1
  4914. 1
  4915. 1
  4916. 1
  4917. 1
  4918. 1
  4919. 1
  4920. 1
  4921. 1
  4922. 1
  4923. 1
  4924. 1
  4925. 1
  4926. 1
  4927. 1
  4928. 1
  4929. 1
  4930. 1
  4931. 1
  4932. 1
  4933. 1
  4934. 1
  4935. 1
  4936. 1
  4937. 1
  4938. 1
  4939. 1
  4940. 1
  4941. 1
  4942. 1
  4943. 1
  4944. 1
  4945. 1
  4946. 1
  4947. 1
  4948. 1
  4949. 1
  4950. 1
  4951. 1
  4952. 1
  4953. 1
  4954. 1
  4955. 1
  4956. 1
  4957. 1
  4958. 1
  4959. 1
  4960. 1
  4961. 1
  4962. 1
  4963. 1
  4964. 1
  4965. 1
  4966. 1
  4967. 1
  4968. 1
  4969. 1
  4970. 1
  4971. 1
  4972. 1
  4973. 1
  4974. 1
  4975. 1
  4976. 1
  4977. 1
  4978. 1
  4979. 1
  4980. 1
  4981. 1
  4982. 1
  4983. 1
  4984. 1
  4985. 1
  4986. 1
  4987. 1
  4988. 1
  4989. 1
  4990. 1
  4991. 1
  4992. 1
  4993. 1
  4994. 1
  4995. 1
  4996. 1
  4997. 1
  4998. 1
  4999. 1
  5000. 1
  5001. 1
  5002. 1
  5003. 1
  5004. 1
  5005. 1
  5006. 1
  5007. 1
  5008. 1
  5009. 1
  5010. 1
  5011. 1
  5012. 1
  5013. 1
  5014. 1
  5015. 1
  5016. 1
  5017. 1
  5018. 1
  5019. 1
  5020. 1
  5021. 1
  5022. 1
  5023. 1
  5024. 1
  5025. 1
  5026. 1
  5027. 1
  5028. 1
  5029. 1
  5030. 1
  5031. 1
  5032. 1
  5033. 1
  5034.  @willdehne1  This is why the late Lee Kuan Yew of Singapore always lamented on Sri Lanka's demise and failure. He always said Sri Lanka had the right ingredients to become another Asian Tiger economy and he used to say this even before Sri Lanka collapsed into ethnic strife in the 1970s. He was very disappointed in that country and very critical of those that changed that country (he's spoken about it in interviews and in the books he's written). This is why Singaporean students are taught about Sri Lanka as an example of what happens when a country discriminates against minorities. Singapore is multiethnic too made up of 4 main ethnic groups: Chinese, Malays, Indians (Tamils) and Eurasians and is one of the most advanced nations on earth. It uses English as the lingua franca so as to give an equal standing for all ethnic groups and makes sure all ethnic groups learn their native languages to keep in touch with their ethnic identities. Sri Lanka could have done the same thing. It has 5 main ethnic groups (Sinhalese, Tamils, Moors, Malays and Burghers/Eurasians), a nation where English was once widely taught and a literate population, it could have easily followed a similar path to Singapore by acknowledging its ethnic diversity but instead it followed the path of ethnic division and eventually set itself on fire. It still pays the price today and continues to suffer a brain drain. Not to mention, this is a developing country with a rapidly aging population and low fertility rate. They're in a such a bad position that had begun hiring foreign workers from India, Bangladesh and Myanmar to fill gaps in their job market. A developing country should not be relying on foreign labour but because of its literate population it was inevitable that the country's fertility would decline and living standards would rise. Too bad that the country is across the board still poor and does not have money to actually support its growing elderly population. They really shot themselves in the foot. I feel sorry for all of the innocent civilians, the elites really destroyed their country. I can see why the late Lee Kuan Yew was so repulsed at what had happened to that country.
    1
  5035. 1
  5036. 1
  5037. 1
  5038. 1
  5039. 1
  5040. 1
  5041. 1
  5042. 1
  5043. 1
  5044. 1
  5045. 1
  5046. 1
  5047. 1
  5048. 1
  5049. 1
  5050. 1
  5051. 1
  5052. 1
  5053. 1
  5054. 1
  5055. 1
  5056. 1
  5057. 1
  5058. 1
  5059. 1
  5060. 1
  5061. 1
  5062. 1
  5063. 1
  5064. 1
  5065. 1
  5066. 1
  5067. 1
  5068. 1
  5069. 1
  5070. 1
  5071. 1
  5072. 1
  5073. 1
  5074. 1
  5075. 1
  5076. 1
  5077. 1
  5078. 1
  5079. 1
  5080. 1
  5081. 1
  5082. 1
  5083. 1
  5084. 1
  5085. 1
  5086. 1
  5087. 1
  5088. 1
  5089. 1
  5090. 1
  5091. 1
  5092. 1
  5093. 1
  5094. 1
  5095. 1
  5096. 1
  5097. 1
  5098. 1
  5099. 1
  5100. 1
  5101. 1
  5102. 1
  5103. 1
  5104. 1
  5105. 1
  5106. 1
  5107. 1
  5108. 1
  5109. 1
  5110. 1
  5111. 1
  5112. 1
  5113. 1
  5114. 1
  5115. 1
  5116.  @garrydean8670  It's not a main reason though. Everybody is talking about China when Sri Lanka owes 10% of its debt to Japan too. Why is everybody talking about China but not Japan, when Sri Lanka owes the same amount to both countries? Western media keeps mentioning China because of Sinophobia. There is a fear of China these days and it's so detrimental to international relations and even ordinary citizens. Firstly, China is an Asian country, outside forces should not drive a wedge between it and other Asian or Pacific countries (like Australia, which is where I'm from). We are all neighbours, we need to learn to live in peace with each other regardless of what we feel for each other. Secondly, I am not fond of the CCP and what it does but blaming China for everything makes no sense. It serves no purpose and only causes harm in the form of strained relations, power struggles between bigger countries over smaller countries (etc. Sri Lanka, Myanmar) and spreading of misinformation on social media (which is a huge issue in some Asian countries like Sri Lanka and Myanmar), which can lead to social unrest (e.g. this has happened in Sri Lanka before). It's also gotten to this point where China is blamed for everything that it's now affecting random Chinese people and even other Asian people who could be mistaken as Chinese in other parts of the world. For example, an elderly Sri Lankan man with light skin and Southeast Asian features was brutally bashed on a train in New York last year in a COVID-19 related racist attack. All those anti-Asian attacks in the US last year really opened my eyes up to the issue of Sinophobia.
    1
  5117. 1
  5118. 1
  5119. 1
  5120. 1
  5121. 1
  5122. 1
  5123. 1
  5124. 1
  5125. 1
  5126. 1
  5127. 1
  5128. 1
  5129. 1
  5130. 1
  5131. 1
  5132. 1
  5133. 1
  5134. 1
  5135. 1
  5136. 1
  5137. 1
  5138. 1
  5139. 1
  5140. 1
  5141. 1
  5142. 1
  5143. 1
  5144. 1
  5145. 1
  5146. 1
  5147. 1
  5148. 1
  5149. 1
  5150. 1
  5151. 1
  5152. 1
  5153. 1
  5154. 1
  5155. 1
  5156. 1
  5157. 1
  5158. 1
  5159. 1
  5160. 1
  5161. 1
  5162. 1
  5163. 1
  5164. 1
  5165. 1
  5166. 1
  5167. 1
  5168. 1
  5169. 1
  5170. 1
  5171. 1
  5172. 1
  5173. 1
  5174. 1
  5175. 1
  5176. 1
  5177. 1
  5178. 1
  5179. 1
  5180. 1
  5181. 1
  5182. 1
  5183. 1
  5184. 1
  5185. 1
  5186. 1
  5187. 1
  5188. 1
  5189. 1
  5190. 1
  5191. 1
  5192. 1
  5193. 1
  5194. 1
  5195. 1
  5196. 1
  5197. 1
  5198. 1
  5199. 1
  5200. 1
  5201. 1
  5202. 1
  5203. 1
  5204. 1
  5205. 1
  5206. 1
  5207. 1
  5208. 1
  5209. 1
  5210. 1
  5211. 1
  5212. 1
  5213. 1
  5214. 1
  5215. 1
  5216. 1
  5217. 1
  5218. 1
  5219. 1
  5220. 1
  5221. 1
  5222. 1
  5223. 1
  5224. 1
  5225. 1
  5226. 1
  5227. 1
  5228. 1
  5229. 1
  5230. 1
  5231. 1
  5232. 1
  5233. 1
  5234. 1
  5235. 1
  5236. 1
  5237. 1
  5238. 1
  5239. 1
  5240. 1
  5241. 1
  5242. 1
  5243. 1
  5244. 1
  5245. 1
  5246. 1
  5247. 1
  5248. 1
  5249. 1
  5250. 1
  5251. 1
  5252. 1
  5253. 1
  5254. 1
  5255. 1
  5256. 1
  5257. 1
  5258. 1
  5259. 1
  5260. 1
  5261. 1
  5262. 1
  5263. 1
  5264. 1
  5265. 1
  5266. 1
  5267. 1
  5268. 1
  5269. 1
  5270. 1
  5271. 1
  5272. 1
  5273. 1
  5274. 1
  5275. 1
  5276. 1
  5277. 1
  5278. 1
  5279. 1
  5280. 1
  5281. 1
  5282. 1
  5283. 1
  5284. 1
  5285. 1
  5286. 1
  5287. 1
  5288. 1
  5289. 1
  5290. 1
  5291. 1
  5292. 1
  5293. 1
  5294. 1
  5295. 1
  5296. 1
  5297. 1
  5298. 1
  5299. 1
  5300. 1
  5301. 1
  5302. 1
  5303. 1
  5304. 1
  5305. 1
  5306. 1
  5307. 1
  5308. 1
  5309. 1
  5310. 1
  5311. 1
  5312. 1
  5313. 1
  5314. 1
  5315. 1
  5316. 1
  5317. 1
  5318. 1
  5319. 1
  5320. 1
  5321. 1
  5322. 1
  5323. 1
  5324. 1
  5325. 1
  5326. 1
  5327. 1
  5328. 1
  5329. 1
  5330. 1
  5331. 1
  5332. 1
  5333. 1
  5334. 1
  5335. 1
  5336.  @opensprings  ...and just so you know, many ethnic groups in eastern India share genetic ties to East Asia and Southeast Asia? India is extremely diverse, just like Russia. Also, Indians are culturally related to East Asians. East, South and Southeast Asia all share a common cultural heritage rooted in the Indic and Sinic cultural traditions. I think it's also worth pointing out that Middle Easterners are genetically related to Europeans. Both Europeans and Middle Easterners belong to the West Eurasian lineage and both groups share an overlapping history. Indians are different as they are a mix of South Eurasian, West Eurasian-related and East Eurasian DNA. Indians are basically "mixed race". Yes Russia is one landmass but Slavic Russians are not Asians and don't identify as Asians (Slavic Russians have literally said this). Slavic Russians colonised Siberia. Siberia (Asian Russia) was never part of Russia to begin with. The native people of Siberia are genetically related to East Asians and Central Asians and practice shamanist beliefs similar to shamanist beliefs in Korea and Japan or practice Vajrayana Buddhism, which is practiced in Mongolia, Tibet, Nepal, Bhutan and parts of Northern India. In other words, the native Siberians are genetically and culturally Asians. Slavic Russians are genetically and culturally European. Their history is tied to Europe, not Asia. Also, just so you know, because of the pandemic Central Asians have experienced racism in European Russia, simply because they're from Asia. Most Central Asians don't even look Chinese. Central Asian-looking people have also faced racism in the areas of Russia in which Central Asian-looking people are native to like Tatarstan due to the pandemic. So while Russia is one continous landmass, a single country, the difference between "Asian" Russia and "European" Russia are very clear when people focus on appearance, culture and religion.
    1
  5337. 1
  5338. 1
  5339. 1
  5340. 1
  5341. 1
  5342. 1
  5343. 1
  5344. 1
  5345. 1
  5346. 1
  5347. 1
  5348. 1
  5349. 1
  5350. 1
  5351. 1
  5352. 1
  5353. 1
  5354. 1
  5355. 1
  5356. 1
  5357. 1
  5358. 1
  5359. 1
  5360. 1
  5361. 1
  5362. 1
  5363. 1
  5364. 1
  5365. 1
  5366. 1
  5367. 1
  5368. 1
  5369. 1
  5370. 1
  5371. 1
  5372. 1
  5373. 1
  5374. 1
  5375. 1
  5376. 1
  5377. 1
  5378. 1
  5379. 1
  5380. 1
  5381. 1
  5382. 1
  5383. 1
  5384. 1
  5385. 1
  5386. 1
  5387. 1
  5388. 1
  5389. 1
  5390. 1
  5391. 1
  5392. 1
  5393. 1
  5394. 1
  5395. 1
  5396. 1
  5397. 1
  5398. 1
  5399. 1
  5400. 1
  5401. 1
  5402. 1
  5403. 1
  5404. 1
  5405. 1
  5406. 1
  5407. 1
  5408. 1
  5409. 1
  5410. 1
  5411. 1
  5412. 1
  5413. 1
  5414. 1
  5415. 1
  5416. 1
  5417. 1
  5418. 1
  5419. 1
  5420. 1
  5421. 1
  5422. 1
  5423. 1
  5424. 1
  5425. 1
  5426. 1
  5427. 1
  5428. 1
  5429. 1
  5430. 1
  5431. 1
  5432. 1
  5433. 1
  5434. 1
  5435. 1
  5436. 1
  5437. 1
  5438. 1
  5439. 1
  5440. 1
  5441. 1
  5442. 1
  5443. 1
  5444. 1
  5445. 1
  5446. 1
  5447. 1
  5448. 1
  5449. 1
  5450. 1
  5451. 1
  5452. 1
  5453. 1
  5454. 1
  5455. 1
  5456. 1
  5457. 1
  5458. 1
  5459. 1
  5460. 1
  5461. 1
  5462. 1
  5463. 1
  5464. 1
  5465. 1
  5466. 1
  5467. 1
  5468. 1
  5469. 1
  5470. 1
  5471. 1
  5472. 1
  5473. 1
  5474. 1
  5475. 1
  5476. 1
  5477. 1
  5478. 1
  5479. 1
  5480. 1
  5481. 1
  5482. 1
  5483. 1
  5484. 1
  5485. 1
  5486. 1
  5487. 1
  5488. 1
  5489.  @davidbowie5023  So not only are you speaking about something you don't understand, you're also finding ways to attack me personally. You're doing a great job showing me the type of person you are. What radical sects? The fact that you're talking about Islam and Christianity here really shows me that you're way out of line to be talking about Buddhism in Asia. Why are you trying to put two and two together in order to peddle a false narrative? Your hate is extremely palpable. The Sri Lankan Civil War has NOTHING to do with Theravada Buddhism and if you actually took the time to understand the conflict, you'd realise it stems from linguistic and ethnic differences. You'd also realise that it stems from Sinhalese supremacy, a concept that includes people of different religions that are ethnically Sinhalese. Nobody went to any Sangha to receive blessings because to inflict violence, don't spread lies because per your logic, the same could be said about Prabhakaran who was a practising Christian. Thaificiation is not connected to Theravada Buddhism lmfao. Are you aware of the fact that many aspects of traditional Thai culture are Hindu in origin? Your obsession with sects is so insane because in Asia, syncretism is a huge thing and the differences between sects are not felt because local religions like Buddhism are syncretised with native or other local beliefs like Hinduism or folk religion. Why are you doing this??? Don't use the Southern Thailand insurgency to push your agenda please. The issue in the deep south is between Malay separatists who want independence from Thailand and the conflict between the Thai government and the Malay separatists. You still don't get it do you? If this is all about Theravada Buddhism, why on earth is the Tatmadaw persecuting the Shan, Rakhine, Karen etc. all of whom practice Theravada Buddhism???? You can't find a single answer to this so your next form of attack is to criticise me and use ad hominems to put me down. Lmfaoooo I actually can't believe this. You are a Western person with an East Asian fetish. I cannot believe you just made this about the economic standing of South/Southeast Asia and East Asia, which has NOTHING to do with Buddhism. Buddhism is not the state religion of any of these countries and your logic makes absolutely no sense because Bhutan practices a different form of Buddhism, that can be classified as Mahayana, to Sri Lanka or Thailand and yet both countries are more socially and economically well off than Bhutan. Only a Western person obsessed with identity politics would say such things and not realise how funny it sounds. There are millions of Theravada Buddhists ethnic groups in southern China and the Chinese government is literally atheist and yet you're making this about sects in Buddhism. You're so interested in making this about sects that you don't even care to learn that Mahayana beliefs are still practiced in Thailand, Sri Lanka, Myanmar etc. etc. like the worship of Guanyin. You also don't realise that there is a sangha in East Asian countries like Taiwan. Here's a word of advice, don't speak on Asian issues if you don't actually understand what's going on in Asia.
    1
  5490. 1
  5491. 1
  5492. 1
  5493. 1
  5494. 1
  5495. 1
  5496. 1
  5497. 1
  5498. 1
  5499. 1
  5500. 1
  5501. 1
  5502. 1
  5503. 1
  5504. 1
  5505. 1
  5506. 1
  5507. 1
  5508. 1
  5509. 1
  5510. 1
  5511. 1
  5512. 1
  5513. 1
  5514. 1
  5515. 1
  5516. 1
  5517. 1
  5518. 1
  5519. 1
  5520. 1
  5521. 1
  5522. 1
  5523. 1
  5524. 1
  5525. 1
  5526. 1
  5527. 1
  5528. 1
  5529. 1
  5530. 1
  5531. 1
  5532. 1
  5533. 1
  5534. 1
  5535. 1
  5536. 1
  5537. 1
  5538. 1
  5539. 1
  5540. 1
  5541. 1
  5542. 1
  5543. 1
  5544. 1
  5545. 1
  5546. 1
  5547. 1
  5548. 1
  5549. 1
  5550. 1
  5551. 1
  5552. 1
  5553. 1
  5554. 1
  5555. 1
  5556. 1
  5557. 1
  5558. 1
  5559. 1
  5560. 1
  5561. 1
  5562. 1
  5563. 1
  5564. 1
  5565. 1
  5566. 1
  5567. 1
  5568. 1
  5569. 1
  5570. 1
  5571. 1
  5572. 1
  5573. 1
  5574. 1
  5575. 1
  5576. 1
  5577. 1
  5578. 1
  5579. 1
  5580. 1
  5581. 1
  5582. 1
  5583. 1
  5584. 1
  5585. 1
  5586. 1
  5587. 1
  5588. 1
  5589. 1
  5590. 1
  5591. 1
  5592. 1
  5593. 1
  5594. 1
  5595. 1
  5596. 1
  5597. 1
  5598. 1
  5599. 1
  5600. 1
  5601. 1
  5602. 1
  5603. 1
  5604. 1
  5605. 1
  5606. 1
  5607. 1
  5608. 1
  5609. 1
  5610. 1
  5611. 1
  5612. 1
  5613. 1
  5614. 1
  5615. 1
  5616. 1
  5617. 1
  5618. 1
  5619. 1
  5620. 1
  5621. 1
  5622. 1
  5623. 1
  5624. 1
  5625. 1
  5626. 1
  5627. 1
  5628. 1
  5629. 1
  5630. 1
  5631. 1
  5632. 1
  5633. 1
  5634. 1
  5635. 1
  5636. 1
  5637.  @dermonch7959  Incels create manifesto online encouraging violence against women (even some men). Jihadists create manifestos online encouraging violence aginst anybody who doesn't believe in their ideology. Neonazis create manifestos online encouraging violence aginst non-European people. All of them use their manifestos to prey on people who feel that the universe has treated then unfairly. All of them have caused violence and destruction at varying degrees. A virgin and an incel are not the same, the latter identifies as an incel and has created a whole identity revolving around their virginity and inability to talk to women. It's a subculture. Being a virgin is not a subculture. You can't compare a group of men sharing a common identity and coining sexist terms like "Noodlew****" and "curryw****" to describe Southeast and South Asian women respectively and claiming those women only find White men attractive to someone who is simply a virgin. Incels have an entire structure to their subculture, they have terms to describe themselves (for example East Asian incels call themselves "ricels" and South Asian incels call themselves "currycels"). They also have terms like "Chad", "Tyrone" and "Chang" to describe White, Black and Asian men that any woman would find attractive. Do virgins have that? No. Do virgins create manifestos online detailing their hatred online and encouraging violence? No. Sorry but incels are on a whole other level and when you have authorities breaking down doors and arresting young male incels for threats of mass violence against women in the same manner that jihadists are captured.
    1
  5638. 1
  5639. 1
  5640. 1
  5641. 1
  5642. 1
  5643. 1
  5644. 1
  5645. 1
  5646. 1
  5647. 1
  5648. 1
  5649. 1
  5650. 1
  5651. 1
  5652. 1
  5653. 1
  5654. 1
  5655. 1
  5656. 1
  5657. 1
  5658. 1
  5659. 1
  5660. 1
  5661. 1
  5662. 1
  5663. 1
  5664. 1
  5665. 1
  5666. 1
  5667. 1
  5668. 1
  5669. 1
  5670. 1
  5671. 1
  5672. 1
  5673. 1
  5674. 1
  5675. 1
  5676. 1
  5677. 1
  5678. 1
  5679. 1
  5680. 1
  5681. 1
  5682. 1
  5683. 1
  5684. 1
  5685. 1
  5686. 1
  5687. 1
  5688. 1
  5689. 1
  5690. 1
  5691. 1
  5692. 1
  5693. 1
  5694. 1
  5695. 1
  5696. 1
  5697. 1
  5698. 1
  5699. 1
  5700. 1
  5701. 1
  5702. 1
  5703. 1
  5704. 1
  5705. 1
  5706. 1
  5707. 1
  5708. 1
  5709. 1
  5710. 1
  5711. 1
  5712. 1
  5713. 1
  5714. 1
  5715. 1
  5716. 1
  5717. 1
  5718. 1
  5719. 1
  5720. 1
  5721. 1
  5722. 1
  5723. 1
  5724. 1
  5725. 1
  5726. 1
  5727. 1
  5728. 1
  5729. 1
  5730. 1
  5731. 1
  5732. 1
  5733. 1
  5734. 1
  5735. 1
  5736. 1
  5737. 1
  5738. 1
  5739. 1
  5740. 1
  5741. 1
  5742. 1
  5743. 1
  5744. 1
  5745. 1
  5746. 1
  5747. 1
  5748. 1
  5749. 1
  5750. 1
  5751. 1
  5752. 1
  5753. 1
  5754. 1
  5755. 1
  5756. 1
  5757. 1
  5758. 1
  5759. 1
  5760. 1
  5761. 1
  5762. 1
  5763. 1
  5764. 1
  5765. 1
  5766. 1
  5767. 1
  5768. 1
  5769. 1
  5770. 1
  5771. 1
  5772. 1
  5773. 1
  5774. 1
  5775. 1
  5776. 1
  5777. 1
  5778. 1
  5779. 1
  5780. 1
  5781. 1
  5782. 1
  5783. 1
  5784. 1
  5785. 1
  5786. 1
  5787. 1
  5788. 1
  5789. 1
  5790. 1
  5791. 1
  5792. 1
  5793. 1
  5794. 1
  5795. 1
  5796. 1
  5797. 1
  5798. 1
  5799. 1
  5800. 1
  5801. 1
  5802. 1
  5803. 1
  5804. 1
  5805. 1
  5806. 1
  5807. 1
  5808. 1
  5809. 1
  5810. 1
  5811. 1
  5812. 1
  5813. 1
  5814. 1
  5815. 1
  5816. 1
  5817. 1
  5818. 1
  5819. 1
  5820. 1
  5821. 1
  5822. 1
  5823. 1
  5824. 1
  5825. 1
  5826. 1
  5827. 1
  5828. 1
  5829. 1
  5830. 1
  5831. 1
  5832. 1
  5833. 1
  5834. 1
  5835. 1
  5836. 1
  5837. 1
  5838. 1
  5839. 1
  5840. 1
  5841. 1
  5842. 1
  5843. 1
  5844. 1
  5845. 1
  5846. 1
  5847. 1
  5848. 1
  5849. 1
  5850. 1
  5851. 1
  5852. 1
  5853. 1
  5854. 1
  5855. 1
  5856. 1
  5857. 1
  5858. 1
  5859. 1
  5860. 1
  5861. 1
  5862. 1
  5863. 1
  5864. 1
  5865. 1
  5866. 1
  5867. 1
  5868. 1
  5869. 1
  5870. 1
  5871. 1
  5872. 1
  5873. 1
  5874. 1
  5875. 1
  5876. 1
  5877. 1
  5878. 1
  5879. 1
  5880. 1
  5881. 1
  5882. 1
  5883. 1
  5884. 1
  5885. 1
  5886. 1
  5887. 1
  5888. 1
  5889. 1
  5890. 1
  5891. 1
  5892. 1
  5893. 1
  5894. 1
  5895. 1
  5896. 1
  5897. 1
  5898. 1
  5899. 1
  5900. 1
  5901. 1
  5902. 1
  5903. 1
  5904. 1
  5905. 1
  5906. 1
  5907. 1
  5908. 1
  5909. 1
  5910. 1
  5911. 1
  5912. 1
  5913. 1
  5914. 1
  5915. 1
  5916. 1
  5917. 1
  5918. 1
  5919. 1
  5920. 1
  5921. 1
  5922. 1
  5923.  @MiguelDLewis  In regards to Thailand, the assimilation process of the Chinese happened hundreds of years ago when ethnic Chinese were migrating to Thailand. This happened a long time ago, sorry I should've been more clearer. It's not a modern example. Thailand also has a declining fertility rate, in fact it's lower than Japan's fertility rate and stands at 1.16, making it the second lowest fertility rate in Southeast Asia after Singapore's 0.97 fertility rate. Singapore's case isn't actually about integrating multiple Asian ethnicities. Singaporeans are mostly of Chinese, Malay and Indian descent so as a result, the Singaporean government accepts immigrants from Malaysia, China, Indonesia and India. Most of them are from Malaysia who are just like Singaporeans and mostly of Chinese, Malay and Indian descent and culturally very similar as they were once part of the same country. The case of Singapore is that it is very strict in who is allowed in but being ethnically Chinese, Malay, Indian and from Malaysia puts you at a much, much higher advantage than every other nationality because Singapore strives hard to maintain the demographics of the country which are 74% Chinese, 14% Malay, 9% Indian and 3% Others (mostly Eurasians). These have been the demographics of the country for hundreds of years. So the government wants to keep it the same to maintain stability, to make sure the Malay and Indian minorities don't get drowned out by immigrants and to make sure the Chinese know that they aren't shrinking in size.
    1
  5924. 1
  5925. 1
  5926. 1
  5927. 1
  5928. 1
  5929. 1
  5930. 1
  5931. 1
  5932. 1
  5933. 1
  5934. 1
  5935. 1
  5936. 1
  5937. 1
  5938. 1
  5939. 1
  5940. 1
  5941. 1
  5942. 1
  5943. 1
  5944. 1
  5945. 1
  5946. 1
  5947. 1
  5948. 1
  5949. 1
  5950. 1
  5951. 1
  5952. 1
  5953. 1
  5954. 1
  5955. 1
  5956. 1
  5957. 1
  5958. 1
  5959. 1
  5960. 1
  5961. 1
  5962. 1
  5963. 1
  5964. 1
  5965. 1
  5966. 1
  5967. 1
  5968. 1
  5969. 1
  5970. 1
  5971. 1
  5972. 1
  5973. 1
  5974. 1
  5975. 1
  5976. 1
  5977. 1
  5978. 1
  5979. 1
  5980. 1
  5981. 1
  5982. 1
  5983. 1
  5984. 1
  5985. 1
  5986. 1
  5987. 1
  5988. 1
  5989. 1
  5990. 1
  5991. 1
  5992. 1
  5993. 1
  5994. 1
  5995. 1
  5996. 1
  5997. 1
  5998. 1
  5999. 1
  6000. 1
  6001. 1
  6002. 1
  6003. 1
  6004. 1
  6005. 1
  6006. 1
  6007. 1
  6008. 1
  6009. 1
  6010. 1
  6011. 1
  6012. 1
  6013. 1
  6014. 1
  6015. 1
  6016. 1
  6017. 1
  6018. 1
  6019. 1
  6020. 1
  6021. 1
  6022. 1
  6023. 1
  6024. 1
  6025. 1
  6026. 1
  6027. 1
  6028. 1
  6029. 1
  6030. 1
  6031. 1
  6032. 1
  6033. 1
  6034. 1
  6035. 1
  6036. 1
  6037. 1
  6038. 1
  6039. 1
  6040. 1
  6041. 1
  6042. 1
  6043. 1
  6044. 1
  6045. 1
  6046. 1
  6047. 1
  6048. 1
  6049. 1
  6050. 1
  6051. 1
  6052. 1
  6053. 1
  6054. 1
  6055. 1
  6056. 1
  6057. 1
  6058. 1
  6059. 1
  6060. 1
  6061. 1
  6062.  @fortpark-wd9sx  All this talk about the MSM and not a single interest in actually listening to Burmese outlets. Where are you from? The Western MSM has spoken about Bangladesh and the Rohingyas for years. Where have you been?? The MSM doesn't talk about the people? Huh?? How many times do I need to tell you that Burmese people are a mixture of many different ancestral components: Tibeto-Burman, which came from East Asia, Austroasiatic, AASI and Indo-Aryan both of which came from South Asia and Kra-Dai which came from southern China. So of course Burmese people will look diverse, there are so many different ethnic groups in the country. Stop talking about the MSM and creating non-existent issues. Rohingyas are Rohingyas, Bamar are Bamar. Per your logic, you're going to tell me that my family are two different races because some people in my family have features more similar to typical Southeast Asians and others with features more similar to typical South Asians. Is that the case? Are we two different races now? Is one of us fake and the other not? My friend's dad is full Bamar but looks more Indian and her mum is not much different with typical SEA traits but my friend looks more closer to East Asian but with more Bamar/SEA eyes. They're Bamar with some Mon, in other words they are 100% Southeast Asian. Is her family also composed of "fake people" and "real people"? I'm genuinely asking you to answer these questions because I still don't understand how you can say such things.
    1
  6063. 1
  6064. 1
  6065. 1
  6066. 1
  6067. 1
  6068. 1
  6069. 1
  6070. 1
  6071. 1
  6072. 1
  6073. 1
  6074. 1
  6075. 1
  6076. 1
  6077. 1
  6078. 1
  6079. 1
  6080. 1
  6081. 1
  6082. 1
  6083. 1
  6084. 1
  6085. 1
  6086. 1
  6087. 1
  6088. 1
  6089. 1
  6090. 1
  6091. 1
  6092. 1
  6093. 1
  6094. 1
  6095. 1
  6096. 1
  6097. 1
  6098. 1
  6099. 1
  6100. 1
  6101. 1
  6102. 1
  6103. 1
  6104. 1
  6105. 1
  6106. 1
  6107. 1
  6108. 1
  6109. 1
  6110. 1
  6111. 1
  6112. 1
  6113. 1
  6114. 1
  6115. 1
  6116. 1
  6117. 1
  6118. 1
  6119. 1
  6120. 1
  6121. 1
  6122. 1
  6123. 1
  6124. 1
  6125. 1
  6126. 1
  6127. 1
  6128. 1
  6129. 1
  6130. 1
  6131. 1
  6132. 1
  6133. 1
  6134. 1
  6135. 1
  6136. 1
  6137. 1
  6138. 1
  6139. 1
  6140. 1
  6141. 1
  6142. 1
  6143. 1
  6144. 1
  6145. 1
  6146. 1
  6147. 1
  6148. 1
  6149. 1
  6150. 1
  6151. 1
  6152. 1
  6153. 1
  6154. 1
  6155. 1
  6156. 1
  6157. 1
  6158. 1
  6159. 1
  6160. 1
  6161. 1
  6162. 1
  6163. 1
  6164. 1
  6165. 1
  6166. 1
  6167. 1
  6168. 1
  6169. 1
  6170. 1
  6171. 1
  6172. 1
  6173. 1
  6174. 1
  6175. 1
  6176. 1
  6177. 1
  6178. 1
  6179. 1
  6180. 1
  6181. 1
  6182. 1
  6183. 1
  6184. 1
  6185. 1
  6186. 1
  6187. 1
  6188. 1
  6189. 1
  6190. 1
  6191. 1
  6192. 1
  6193. 1
  6194. 1
  6195. 1
  6196. 1
  6197. 1
  6198. 1
  6199. 1
  6200. 1
  6201. 1
  6202. 1
  6203. 1
  6204. 1
  6205. 1
  6206. 1
  6207. 1
  6208. 1
  6209. 1
  6210. 1
  6211. 1
  6212. 1
  6213. 1
  6214. 1
  6215. 1
  6216. 1
  6217. 1
  6218. 1
  6219. 1
  6220. 1
  6221. 1
  6222. 1
  6223. 1
  6224. 1
  6225. 1
  6226. 1
  6227. 1
  6228. 1
  6229. 1
  6230. 1
  6231. 1
  6232. 1
  6233. 1
  6234. 1
  6235. 1
  6236. 1
  6237. 1
  6238. 1
  6239. 1
  6240. 1
  6241. 1
  6242. 1
  6243. 1
  6244. 1
  6245. 1
  6246. 1
  6247. 1
  6248. 1
  6249. 1
  6250. 1
  6251. 1
  6252. 1
  6253. 1
  6254. 1
  6255. 1
  6256. 1
  6257. 1
  6258. 1
  6259. 1
  6260. 1
  6261. 1
  6262. 1
  6263. 1
  6264. 1
  6265. 1
  6266. 1
  6267. 1
  6268. 1
  6269. 1
  6270. 1
  6271. 1
  6272. 1
  6273. 1
  6274. 1
  6275. 1
  6276. 1
  6277. 1
  6278. 1
  6279. 1
  6280. 1
  6281. 1
  6282. 1
  6283. 1
  6284. 1
  6285. 1
  6286. 1
  6287. 1
  6288. 1
  6289. 1
  6290. 1
  6291. 1
  6292. 1
  6293. 1
  6294. 1
  6295. 1
  6296. 1
  6297. 1
  6298. 1
  6299. 1
  6300. 1
  6301. 1
  6302. 1
  6303. 1
  6304. 1
  6305. 1
  6306. 1
  6307. 1
  6308. 1
  6309. 1
  6310. 1
  6311. 1
  6312. 1
  6313. 1
  6314. 1
  6315. 1
  6316. 1
  6317. 1
  6318. 1
  6319. 1
  6320. 1
  6321. 1
  6322. 1
  6323. 1
  6324. 1
  6325. 1
  6326. 1
  6327. 1
  6328. 1
  6329. 1
  6330. 1
  6331. 1
  6332. 1
  6333. 1
  6334. 1
  6335. 1
  6336. 1
  6337. 1
  6338. 1
  6339. 1
  6340. 1
  6341. 1
  6342. 1
  6343. 1
  6344. 1
  6345. 1
  6346. 1
  6347. 1
  6348. 1
  6349. 1
  6350. 1
  6351. 1
  6352. 1
  6353. 1
  6354. 1
  6355. 1
  6356. 1
  6357. 1
  6358. 1
  6359. 1
  6360. 1
  6361. 1
  6362. 1
  6363. 1
  6364. 1
  6365. 1
  6366. 1
  6367. 1
  6368. 1
  6369. 1
  6370. 1
  6371. 1
  6372. 1
  6373. 1
  6374.  @brudd9573  I think you misunderstood me, nobody's saying they can't do what they want, they can. They're sovereign nations and they have every right to join NATO because they see NATO as protection from Russian aggression. Well some American media outlets such as CNN have spoken about India and why they are neutral. That's how I learned about that. Nobody should be blaming smaller European countries. They aren't to blame. The whole situation is sticky and what this video has shown is that there is another side to this but that doesn't negate the fact that Russia is the one who started the war and Russia/Putin is the one that is jeopardising Europe's stability and the broader world. Russia is the sole reason for this war and what has happened since the 2010s. However, if we look back (as this video has done) and view it objectively (disregarding our own views), we can learn that there are other pieces that form the broader picture. To the Russians, NATO is the threat and to NATO, the Russians are the threat. Thank you for that, I really do appreciate you saying that. I'd also like to thank you for responding in a civil manner and using facts to make your points. It makes it easier to understand your view points and I agree with parts of your rationale. I guess, I'm looking at it differently and it may give off a different impression. I'm glad you posted that final sentence. It's really nice how even though you don't agree with me, you're still willing to listen and have a peaceful discussion.
    1
  6375. 1
  6376. 1
  6377. 1
  6378. 1
  6379. 1
  6380. 1
  6381. 1
  6382. 1
  6383. 1
  6384. 1
  6385. 1
  6386. 1
  6387. 1
  6388. 1
  6389. 1
  6390. 1
  6391. 1
  6392. 1
  6393. 1
  6394. 1
  6395. 1
  6396. 1
  6397. 1
  6398. 1
  6399. 1
  6400. 1
  6401. 1
  6402. 1
  6403. 1
  6404. 1
  6405. 1
  6406. 1
  6407. 1
  6408. 1
  6409. 1
  6410. 1
  6411. 1
  6412. 1
  6413. 1
  6414. 1
  6415. 1
  6416. 1
  6417. 1
  6418. 1
  6419. 1
  6420. 1
  6421. 1
  6422. 1
  6423. 1
  6424. 1
  6425. 1
  6426. 1
  6427. 1
  6428. 1
  6429. 1
  6430. 1
  6431. 1
  6432. 1
  6433. 1
  6434. 1
  6435. 1
  6436. 1
  6437. 1
  6438. 1
  6439. 1
  6440. 1
  6441. 1
  6442. 1
  6443. 1
  6444. 1
  6445. 1
  6446. 1
  6447. 1
  6448. 1
  6449. 1
  6450. 1
  6451. 1
  6452. 1
  6453. 1
  6454. 1
  6455. 1
  6456. 1
  6457. 1
  6458. 1
  6459. 1
  6460. 1
  6461. 1
  6462. 1
  6463. 1
  6464. 1
  6465. 1
  6466. 1
  6467. 1
  6468. 1
  6469. 1
  6470. 1
  6471. 1
  6472. 1
  6473. 1
  6474. 1
  6475. 1
  6476. 1
  6477. 1
  6478. 1
  6479. 1
  6480. 1
  6481. 1
  6482. 1
  6483. 1
  6484. 1
  6485. 1
  6486. 1
  6487. 1
  6488. 1
  6489. 1
  6490. 1
  6491. 1
  6492. 1
  6493. 1
  6494. 1
  6495. 1
  6496. 1
  6497. 1
  6498. 1
  6499. 1
  6500. 1
  6501. 1
  6502. 1
  6503. 1
  6504. 1
  6505. 1
  6506. 1
  6507. 1
  6508. 1
  6509. 1
  6510. 1
  6511. 1
  6512. 1
  6513. 1
  6514. 1
  6515. 1
  6516. 1
  6517. 1
  6518. 1
  6519. 1
  6520. 1
  6521. 1
  6522. 1
  6523. 1
  6524. 1
  6525. 1
  6526. 1
  6527. 1
  6528. 1
  6529. 1
  6530. 1
  6531. 1
  6532. 1
  6533. 1
  6534. 1
  6535. 1
  6536. 1
  6537. 1
  6538. 1
  6539. 1
  6540. 1
  6541. 1
  6542. 1
  6543. 1
  6544. 1
  6545. 1
  6546. 1
  6547. 1
  6548. 1
  6549. 1
  6550. 1
  6551. 1
  6552. 1
  6553. 1
  6554. 1
  6555. 1
  6556. 1
  6557. 1
  6558. 1
  6559. 1
  6560. 1
  6561. 1
  6562. 1
  6563. 1
  6564. 1
  6565. 1
  6566. 1
  6567. 1
  6568. 1
  6569. 1
  6570. 1
  6571. 1
  6572. 1
  6573. 1
  6574. 1
  6575. 1
  6576. 1
  6577. 1
  6578. 1
  6579. 1
  6580. 1
  6581. 1
  6582. 1
  6583. 1
  6584. 1
  6585. 1
  6586. 1
  6587. 1
  6588. 1
  6589. 1
  6590. 1
  6591. 1
  6592. 1
  6593. 1
  6594. 1
  6595. 1
  6596. 1
  6597. 1
  6598. 1
  6599. 1
  6600. 1
  6601. 1
  6602. 1
  6603. 1
  6604. 1
  6605. 1
  6606. 1
  6607. 1
  6608. 1
  6609. 1
  6610. 1
  6611. 1
  6612. 1
  6613. 1
  6614. 1
  6615. 1
  6616. 1
  6617. 1
  6618. 1
  6619. 1
  6620. 1
  6621. 1
  6622. 1
  6623. 1
  6624. 1
  6625. 1
  6626. 1
  6627. 1
  6628. 1
  6629. ​ @jdmytho9599  You're so wrong lmao. In the UK, '"Asian" means Indian. In Australia, even though "Asian" means "East Asian" people still know India is part of Asia. In the US, Indians are legally classified as Asians and educated Americans know that Indians are Asians. In African countries like Kanya and South Africa, "Asian" means Indian. There is a whole community of Indians in Kenya known officially as "Kenyan Asians". In the Gulf nations of the Middle East, "Asian" means Indian. Qatar built a whole complex called Asian Town and it's full of Indian/South Asian shops. In Southeast Asia, "Indians are always considered Asian. You really thought you could get away with that one. Many Malaysians, Singaporeans, Burmese have Indian ancestry and Southeast Asia is culturally influenced by India. Everything from the language scripts to write Thai, Khmer, Burmese, Javanese, to religion (Buddhism and Hinduism), to attire (e.g. Thai sabai, Cambodian sampot and Burmese longyi) to architecture (e.g. Angkor Wat) to traditional greetings (e.g. Thai wai, Cambodian sampeah and Balinese Om Swastiastu) to traditional Southeast Asian food (Thai, Burmese, Cambodian, Malaysian, Indonesian, Vietnamese curries and cooking techniques) are all of Indian/South Asian origin. Next time, don't lie to an Asian person and tell us who we consider who is Asian and who is not. India (and China) are the mothers of Eastern culture. So don't even try to say Indians are not Asians. BTW, stop liking your own comments. Also, funny you keep calling them "East Indians". Do you know why they're called that? The "East" in "East Indian" refers to their Asian origin (as in coming from the Eastern world). Smh...
    1
  6630. 1
  6631. 1
  6632. 1
  6633. 1
  6634. 1
  6635. 1
  6636. 1
  6637.  @harshavandu  Akhand Bharat is akin to China's belief in expansionism and acquiring territory linked to the Qing dynasty (aka "Greater China"). It is not the same as the Indosphere which is the Indic equivalent to the Sinosphere (Chinese cultural sphere), the later of which is not connected to "Greater China". The rise in believers of Akhand Bharat are dangerous to India's reputation and I will be frank, India's reputation isn't the best overseas. While many like to believe India is the benevolent opposite to expansionist China, there are also many who are weary of what India may become in the future as it gets more powerful. A respected former diplomat in Australia (my country) published a book a few years ago about the Asian Century and he suggested that India, as it becomes more powerful, may begin to exert influence in southern Asia and the Indian Ocean. Last year, an article published in The Diplomat also spoke about the threat of "Akhand Bharat" and the rise of the RSS. It may not seem so plausible today but those young men online who believe in Akhand Bharat will eventually come to power, we don't know what will happen then. Now I honestly believe the only way India is going to be able to gain the respect of the world is to get the world to fear it (at least per current standards), that or some well thought out form of soft power that changes international public opinion (like what the Korean Wave has done for South Korea). However going down the route of Akhand Bharat is not the way to go and I asked these questions because a recent video on TikTok quoted a bunch of tweets made by Indian nationalists that touched upon this topic (though was not the topic of the video) and a few days ago, someone on another YT video told me that countries like Nepal and Sri Lanka are "Indian states". So I had to ask, if that makes sense.
    1
  6638. 1
  6639. 1
  6640. 1
  6641. 1
  6642. 1
  6643. 1
  6644. 1
  6645. 1
  6646. 1
  6647. 1
  6648. 1
  6649. 1
  6650. 1
  6651. 1
  6652. 1
  6653. 1
  6654. 1
  6655. 1
  6656. 1
  6657. 1
  6658. 1
  6659. 1
  6660. 1
  6661. 1
  6662. 1
  6663. 1
  6664. 1
  6665. 1
  6666. 1
  6667. 1
  6668. 1
  6669. 1
  6670. 1
  6671. 1
  6672. 1
  6673. 1
  6674. 1
  6675. 1
  6676. 1
  6677. 1
  6678. 1
  6679. 1
  6680.  @newtonmin3174  Yeah but some of your points are not correct. Not all Rohingyas are Muslims, there are Hindu and Christian Rohingyas too and while the Hindu and Christian Rohingyas are treated better than their Muslim counterparts, they too were driven out of their homes and now live in refugee camps in Bangladesh. Yes Islamophobia exacerbated the situation but that is not the root cause of the problem. The Rohingyas have been "othered" first due to their decision to side with the British in the 1940s, the second for their attempt to gain independence after Myanmar became a country, the third when they were stripped off citizenship in the 1970s and finally when the military brainwashed the Bamar into thinking the Rohingyas were illegal immigrants from Bangladesh during the 2010s. It's very easy to claim that it's all due to religion but it's far more complex than religion. Burmese military has a tight control on information so it's unsurprising that the Bamar, who live far away from Rakhine State, would fall for military propaganda. Most of them have never been to Rakhine State and most of them know very little about Rakhine State. Those who are Islamophobic are the ultranationalists and their Islamophobia is no different to the Islamophobia in other parts of Southeast and South Asia. In fact, the Burmese ultranationalists who are Islamophobic see themselves as part of a network with other ultranationalists, such as those from Sri Lanka and they've also inspired the ultranationalists in India and share similarities to their counterparts in Thailand. To them, they claim they all face extinction in South and Southeast Asia because of their communities' low fertility rates compared to Muslims. The Burmese ultranationalists played a role in brainwashing Bamar people but they are not the roose cause of the situation. Also, when you say "Burmese" you mean "Bamar" because it is Bamar that accepted the Islamophobic and illegal immigrant propaganda. The ethnic groups in Rakhine State, on the other hand, have lived with Rohingyas for centuries and had no issue until the Bamar took over and the British colonised the area. The important thing is that many Bamar are now supportive of Rohingyas and this support has been accepted by many Rohingyas in Kutupalong refugee camp in Bangladesh. People are finally realising they were wrong and are now expressing regret for their silence.
    1
  6681.  @newtonmin3174  Yes Rakhine were killing Rohingyas. That violence started in 2012 when a Rakhine woman was gang raped by Rohingyas. That started the whole destruction between the two groups. However, before 2012 things were good between rakhine and Rohingyas. Both groups lived with each other peacefully, went to the same schools and frequented shops owned by Rohingyas and Rakhine. You should read the testimonies from people that lived in this area before the 2012 violence. How am I saying Islamophobia is only centred in Rakhine State? I have been talking about the Bamar the whole time and Islamophobia among Bamar and Bamar don't live in Rakhine State. What makes you think I'm only talking about Rakhine? Muslims? Before the military took over, there were Muslims in the Burmese government. I don't know why you think all Muslims are facing the same turmoil in Myanmar like the Rohingyas. Not all Muslims in Myanmar are Rohingyas. Yes Islamophobia exists but that doesn't extend to all Muslims, some Muslims in Myanmar (e.g. Rohingyas) face more discrimination in Myanmar than others. There is a long history of Bamar Muslim politicians in the Burmese government. Most are actually supporting the Rohingyas now. If the Burmese government-in-exile is now supportive of Rohingyas why would you say only some are supportive. You need to read about the Burmese government-in-exile and read what they are saying. You;ll see attitudes are changing. I said earlier on there was also a viral campaign in Myanmar to show support for Rohingyas. It went viral in Myanmar. Things don't go viral if most people aren't aware of something. Attitudes are changing and many Rohingyas are very welcoming of this. It has to start somewhere. The fact that people are finally waking up is a really good thing. I didn't think this day would ever come but it did.
    1
  6682. 1
  6683. 1
  6684. 1
  6685. 1
  6686. 1
  6687. 1
  6688. 1
  6689. 1
  6690. 1
  6691. 1
  6692. 1
  6693. 1
  6694. 1
  6695. 1
  6696. 1
  6697. 1
  6698. 1
  6699. 1
  6700. 1
  6701. 1
  6702. 1
  6703. 1
  6704. 1
  6705. 1
  6706. 1
  6707. 1
  6708. 1
  6709. 1
  6710. 1
  6711. 1
  6712. 1
  6713. 1
  6714. 1
  6715. 1
  6716. 1
  6717. 1
  6718. 1
  6719. 1
  6720. 1
  6721. 1
  6722. 1
  6723. 1
  6724. 1
  6725. 1
  6726. 1
  6727. 1
  6728. 1
  6729. 1
  6730. 1
  6731. 1
  6732. 1
  6733. 1
  6734. 1
  6735. 1
  6736. 1
  6737. 1
  6738. 1
  6739. 1
  6740. 1
  6741. 1
  6742. 1
  6743. 1
  6744. 1
  6745. 1
  6746. 1
  6747. ​ @montaser9985  I'm speaking about ultraconservative branches of the religion imported from the Middle East that have changed people's way of thinking in Malaysia. The truth is every high high income ultraconservative Muslim-majority nation that has become a high income economy is due to exploitation of migrant workers and/or oil. You can't compare the success of UAE, Qatar, Kuwait or Bahrain to the success of Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan or Japan when the former nations have developed through oil harvesting and exploitation of migrant workers. In fact, the majority of people who live in those countries are not even local citizens but foreigners (mostly from South and Southeast Asia). The locals also do not work, that's why white collar workers are also employed in large numbers to work in these countries. In other words, foreigners are the ones that have propped up those economies. Same thing applies to places like Saudi Arabia, they all rely heavily on foreigners to keep them afloat. Their failure to control COVID-19 really showed how much they rely on foreigners. Brunei is kind of an exception. They became rich through oil harvesting but they also rely on foreign workers too, not to the extent that exists in the Gulf nations though. Another reason for why Gulf nations have succeeded apart from what I already stated is because ultraconservative Islam is native to the Arab world. It is part of the local's cultural psyche and is very different to Malaysia or anywhere else outside of the Arab world. Ultraconservative Islam is not native to Malaysia. In fact, it's supplanting the original strand of Islam practiced in Malaysia before people started adopting Arab cultural practices.
    1
  6748. 1
  6749. 1
  6750. 1
  6751. 1
  6752. 1
  6753. 1
  6754. 1
  6755. 1
  6756. 1
  6757. 1
  6758. 1
  6759. 1
  6760. 1
  6761. 1
  6762. 1
  6763. 1
  6764. 1
  6765. 1
  6766. 1
  6767. 1
  6768. 1
  6769. 1
  6770. 1
  6771. 1
  6772. 1
  6773. 1
  6774. 1
  6775. 1
  6776. 1
  6777. 1
  6778. 1
  6779. 1
  6780. 1
  6781. 1
  6782. 1
  6783. 1
  6784. 1
  6785. 1
  6786. 1
  6787. 1
  6788. 1
  6789. 1
  6790. 1
  6791. 1
  6792. 1
  6793. 1
  6794. 1
  6795. 1
  6796. 1
  6797. 1
  6798. 1
  6799. 1
  6800. 1
  6801. 1
  6802. 1
  6803. 1
  6804. 1
  6805. 1
  6806. 1
  6807. 1
  6808. 1
  6809. 1
  6810. 1
  6811. 1
  6812. 1
  6813. 1
  6814. 1
  6815. 1
  6816. 1
  6817. 1
  6818. 1
  6819. 1
  6820. 1
  6821. 1
  6822. 1
  6823. 1
  6824. 1
  6825. 1
  6826. 1
  6827. 1
  6828. 1
  6829. 1
  6830. 1
  6831. 1
  6832. 1
  6833. 1
  6834. 1
  6835. 1
  6836. 1
  6837. 1
  6838. 1
  6839. 1
  6840. 1
  6841. 1
  6842. 1
  6843. 1
  6844. 1
  6845. 1
  6846. 1
  6847. 1
  6848. 1
  6849. 1
  6850. 1
  6851. 1
  6852. 1
  6853. 1
  6854. 1
  6855. 1
  6856. 1
  6857. 1
  6858. 1
  6859. 1
  6860. 1
  6861.  @royjacobs1204  Those are punishments. They're being punished because the decisions they made as sovereign nations were not accepted by the Global North. That's what happened to Bangladesh. Bangladesh abstained at the UN due to its close relationship with Russia and it was punished for it by Lithuania. Lithuania announced it had stopped the shipment of COVID-19 vaccines to Bangladesh because Bangladesh has decided to abstain. Apart from the fact that it's really wrong to politicise humanitarian assistance in the middle of a pandemic of all things and for Bangladesh deciding to abstain, it was also wrong to punish Bangladesh because the reason it abstained is because the Soviets had supported Bangladesh in its war of independence and had provided assistance to the country in the aftermath of the Bangladeshi genocide (which the US was shockingly actively supporting and encouraging because the US and Pakistan are allies). By punishing Global South nations it gives an image that their lives are not worthy, that they're expendable and recent events seem to prove that. They have every right to remain neutral and not be targeted by the Global North for their right to decide for themselves. They shouldn't be bullied or coerced into picking sides and following the rules of other nations. This tactic that has been employed forever is the reason why alliances break and why the global order is changing as we speak. The Global South is not a league of poor recently independent post-colonial nations, they now have China leading them with all of the BRI projects and trade that occurs as well as the vocal power of China, not to mention the roles of India and the BRICS in general (e.g. the deep economic impact of China and India on Africa).
    1
  6862.  @royjacobs1204  "And other individual nations or alliances have every right to judge those decisions and react accordingly as they see fit" Then they prove that they are just as bad as the country that they are fighting or competing against. The issue is that China does not portray itself as a "good country". It is very much aware that the country has committed crimes against humanity (which the world knows about) and thus is in a position where it does not judge other countries for the things they have done (which is why China is able to to business with every country, including other countries that have committed crimes against humanity). The US and the rest of the West on the other hand are not like that. Despite the shocking things they have done (including crimes against humanity), they present themselves as keepers of morality and goodness and that what they do is for the benefit of others (which is extremely US-centric) but in the same breath will punish countries that don't agree with them but you're okay with that to the point that you call it "guilt tripping". This type of attitude is why the global order is changing and the US is in part to blame for everything that is happening. You believe it's okay to punish other nations for remaining neutral and obviously this attitude is pervasive at the highest level in parts of the West but that attitude does nothing but bring more harm and unwanted change. If a country wants to remain neutral and refrain from getting involved in a conflict happening on the other side of the world, they should be allowed to do that not be punished.
    1
  6863. 1
  6864. 1
  6865.  @royjacobs1204  Firstly, Bangladesh abstained, meaning they are neutral and in no way are supporting anybody. They abstained. Abstain is not showing support. Secondly, your contempt for the lives of the Global South is paramount. You talk of "jeopardising" the way of life of Europeans and Americans, but are indifferent to the destruction the US/UK/EU has caused to the Global South. So it's okay that 3 million Bangladeshis were murdered and faced genocidal rape by Pakistanis with strong support from the US or the thousands of Korean, Sri Lankan, Nepalese, Filipino and other Southeast Asian women trafficked into working as sex slaves on US military bases in Korea in the 1990s but when destruction happens in a part of Europe (excluding the Balkans because the rest of Europe and the US simply do not care about that region either) you want the whole world to fight your war. That doesn't sound fair. Thirdly, we are in a global pandemic. You really think preventing shipments of COVID-19 vaccines is only going to hurt the Bangladeshis? It's going to hurt the whole world because this pandemic will continue to be prolonged and more variants will emerge and more destruction to the entire world. It's in the interest of the world to end this pandemic not politicise it because a distant Asian country decided to remain neutral. This type of behaviour only sends these countries into the arms of the CCP. You know, I shouldn't be surprised by these statements. The true feelings of the US and UK/EU have come forward (and I make a clear point to exclude Australia and NZ because even though they are Western, they are not part of this global power struggle) through their response to Ukraine and the mainstream US/UK/EU mainstream media. While China and India asked to temporarily waive IP so that they could make Pfizer and Modern vaccines to give out for free to developing countries, the US and the pharmaceutical companies said "no". It's so clear to see.
    1
  6866. 1
  6867. 1
  6868. 1
  6869. 1
  6870. 1
  6871. 1
  6872. 1
  6873. 1
  6874. 1
  6875. 1
  6876. 1
  6877. 1
  6878. 1
  6879. 1
  6880. 1
  6881. 1
  6882. 1
  6883. 1
  6884. 1
  6885. 1
  6886. 1
  6887. 1
  6888. 1
  6889. 1
  6890. 1
  6891. 1
  6892. 1
  6893. 1
  6894. 1
  6895. 1
  6896. 1
  6897. 1
  6898. 1
  6899. 1
  6900. 1
  6901. 1
  6902. 1
  6903. 1
  6904. 1
  6905. 1
  6906. 1
  6907. 1
  6908. 1
  6909. 1
  6910. 1
  6911. 1
  6912. 1
  6913. 1
  6914. 1
  6915. 1
  6916. 1
  6917. 1
  6918. 1
  6919. 1
  6920. 1
  6921. 1
  6922. 1
  6923. 1
  6924. 1
  6925. 1
  6926. 1
  6927. 1
  6928. 1
  6929. 1
  6930. 1
  6931. 1
  6932. 1
  6933. 1
  6934. 1
  6935. 1
  6936. 1
  6937. 1
  6938. 1
  6939. 1
  6940. 1
  6941. 1
  6942. 1
  6943. 1
  6944. 1
  6945. 1
  6946. 1
  6947. 1