Comments by "duncan smith" (@duncansmith7562) on "Putin acknowledges radical Islamists carried out concert hall attack | DW News" video.

and the US and Ukraine would shout out "Ukraine is innocent" even without knowing any details about any bad news coming from Russia
10
3 questions the Western MSM refuse to ask: 1. who ordered the attack? 2. why were the 4 suspects driving as fast as possible to Ukraine in their escape? 3. what details and from where did the US get their tip off about a terror attack in Moscow?
4
Nope. Bryansk, where the suspects were stopped, ain't on the way to Belarus. It's on the direct route to Ukraine, so, try again.
2
@zollen123 without knowing any pertinent details, why would you totally discount any Ukrainian involvement?
2
@zollen123 so, given that Ukraine today confessed to the terrorist attack on Dugina, why would you assume Ukrainian innocence regarding the Moscow attack?
2
@usul573 They were stopped in Bryansk, en route to Ukraine. The debunkers are just liars.
1
@Юрий-т7ф9п where is Balarus? could it be anywhere near Belarus? do you have a clue where anywhere is in the world? given you know all the details, what is the name of the town where they were stopped, and why did they choose Belarus as their destination? cue crickets.
1
@usul573 what, suddenly you believe Lukashenko? when did you start believing in the words of the Belarussian dictator? but go ahead, tell the world what Lukashenko confirmed.
1
@usul573 as expected, you can't quote Lukashenko's words, nor even tell me what to google to find this fictitious debunking. nice try, but you have revealed yourself as a pathetic liar. what makes you think Lukashenko has any idea who planned this attack?
1
@BethayaFKL8 Read Lukashenko's words very carefully. Lukashenko said that he sealed the Belarus border, so that the terrorists could NOT enter Belarus, in case the terrorists had plans to enter Belarus before entering Ukraine. Lukashenko would have no idea where the terrorists would be heading, would he? the terrorists were stopped at Bryansk, directly en route to Ukraine.
1
@usul573 if you really thinks that Lukashenko's statement that he sealed the Belarus border = the terrorists were heading to Belarus, then it looks like reading comprehension is not your thing. think, for once in your life. how would Lukashenko have any clue where the terrorists were trying to get to?
1
@BethayaFKL8 the road blockade set up by Lukashenko, would that be in Belarus or in Russia? think carefully before you answer.
1
@usul573 "falsely blame Ukraine" as if you have any clue who ordered this attack. Ukraine already confessed, just today, to the previous terrorist attacks on Russians in Russia, yet you disregard this. why?
1
@BethayaFKL8 His exact words would be in Russian, so, no, these are not his exact words, but the words a reporter has decided to publish. think for one minute. how would the the 4 terrorists, driving at full speed to get out of Russia, realize that there was no chance to enter Belarus? How would they know that? "they took a turn"....where did they take a turn? did Lukashenko have a drone and spot where this white Renault "took a turn"? just think before you write bs.
1
@BethayaFKL8 in Russian, do you know how "ooznat'" can be translated as "realize" and "know"? what Russian words were used for "take a turn"? maybe "napravlyaytsa"? (head towards"...we have all mistranslated "turn towards/take a turn" with "head towards" right? are you a Russian speaker? could well be a more accurate translation would have been "the terrorists knew they could not enter Belarus. They continued directly towards Ukraine" I see nothing in Lukashenko's words that claims the terrorists had Belarus as a first choice of destination.
1
@BethayaFKL8 the whole of this article is about how secure the Belarus border was made when the terrorists were known to be heading towards Bryansk. At no point in the article does Lukashenko claim that Ukraine was not the chosen destination of the terrorists. try again.
1
@usul573 homework assignment: google "Vasily Malyuk" and see his confession that Ukraine killed civilians Kiva, Tatarsky, Prilepin, Gorenko, Kornet. Ukraine repeatedly conducts terrorist attacks on Russian civilians. Malyuk is telling the truth. you are the liar.
1
@BethayaFKL8 the idea that Lukashenko gives a monkey's backside about one line mistranslated or what Western MSM says is laughable! Both he and Putin stopped caring about what the West thinks a long time ago. 1. this "blockade" that the terrorists must have seen, was the blockade in Russia or Belarus? I already asked you this, but you refuse to answer, it seems. think carefully before you answer. 2. you are the one who abides by Lukashenko's words as translated into English. He never said they "turned back", he said "they took a turn". when exiting a highway, when do you ever NOT take a turn? it's impossible to go eternally in a straight line, especially when your destination (Ukraine border at the closest point) would require a "turn" from the E101 at Bryansk (which was where they were arrested). there is nothing in what Lukashenko said that contradicts the idea that Ukraine was the destination of the terrorists. nothing. read it again and look at the map of the Bryansk area. what makes you 100% sure that the terrorists hadn't considered getting into Ukraine via Belarus anyway?
1
@BethayaFKL8 If crossing into Belarus before entering Ukraine was the intention of the terrorists, it would make sense for 2 reasons. Can you think of those 2 reasons? if crossing into Belarus to hide in Belarus was the intention, it makes no sense, unless you can explain why Belarus would be a better option than Ukraine.
1
@BethayaFKL8 one of my students is a Ukrainian living in Spain. A few months ago his grandparents returned to Dnipro after living a while in Spain. They did so because they figured their chances of survival were good. Actual Ukrainians disagree with you!
1
@BethayaFKL8 so, if the terrorists thought that Belarus was such a good idea, why not take the shortest route from Moscow via Smolensk? Taking the E101 to Bryansk is not the direct way to go to Belarus! It IS the direct route to Ukraine. Look at a map!
1
@BethayaFKL8 As I already pointed out, if Ukraine was unsafe, why do all Western leaders go there? Ukraine is only terribly unsafe where the fighting is happening. Outside of the war zone, you are much more likely to be the victim of violent crime in any Western city. Lvov is MUCH safer than London. You are just ignorant. Just because a country is at war doesn't make the whole country unsafe. When Britain was at war with Germany in WW2, were the Scottish Highland unsafe?
1
@BethayaFKL8 Haiti is not at war with anyone. Is Haiti safe? where did you get the notion that the whole of a country at war must be unsafe? where did you get the notion that a nation not at war must be perfectly safe. Russia is at war. Is Vladivostok unsafe?
1
@BethayaFKL8 if you are an enemy of Russia, Ukraine is much safer than Belarus, yes. by far. obviously.
1
@BethayaFKL8 curious you are unable to answer any of my simple questions. there are only Russian soldiers in 20% of Ukraine. in 80% of Ukraine, there are no Russian soldiers, obviously. do i think the terrorists would try to enter the 80% where there are no Russian soldiers? absolutely yes. only a fool would think otherwise.
1
the real danger here is the Western media automatically discount ANY Ukrainian involvement without knowing ANY of the details of who ordered this attack. methinks thou doth protest too much. had MSM kept an open mind, their reporting might have some authority.
1
@andreasbpunkt funny you are asking for a source. what source tells you that there is zero chance Ukraine could possibly be involved?
1
@zollen123 wise people rule nothing out until all the facts are known. you should know that. the reports of the one guy having served in the Ukrainian army, and the car racing towards Ukraine points to Ukrainian involvement, agreed?
1
@bonnie7898 Ukraine can do absolutely nothing wrong to lose support from the West! All the Western leaders have put their political careers on stopping Russia from winning, and the brainwashed masses, like you, can never see any Ukrainian involvement in terrorism, even when Ukraine admits it, as happened today!
1
@zollen123 whichever side you believe values credibility and which side doesn't gives no answers to pertinent questions like, who ordered the attack? Just today, Ukraine confessed to the previous terrorist attacks launched against Russians in Russia.
1
@zollen123 just curious, do you believe everything that Kiev announces?
1
@bonnie7898 true, but it is reason enough for the Western MSM to stop shouting "there is ZERO chance that Ukraine is involved in this".
1
@paulgibbon5991 the biggest concentration of Russian troops is on the frontline, in Donbass, Kherson and Zaporozhe. what makes you think there are many troops on the Gremyach border crossing?
1
@paulgibbon5991 what makes you think the Gremyach border crossing has loads of Russian troops? it's not the frontline.
1
@hfmkkskpo4127 oh, you mean that warning, weeks ago, that applied to a 48 hour period? what convinces you that warning is in any way connected to what happened 3 weeks later? John Kirby didn't connect the two at all.
1
@paulgibbon5991 amazingly, though given your total ignorance I guess it is not that amazing, you seem to think the entire battle frontline extends over the entire Russia/Ukraine border. It doesn't. The front lines go from Kherson through Zaporozhe, Donetsk and into Lugansk, as they have done for almost 2 years! there is no front line, for example, in the Sumy region. just a regular border with the regular border guards. with contacts on the Ukrainian side to help, slipping into Ukraine through the extensive woods from Russia into Ukraine wouldn't be like walking through the front lines, duh!
1
@bonnie7898 oh, I'm sure, for you, trying to understand simple common sense is an arduous task. here is a second dose for you, to see if your dim mind can grasp basic logic: it makes perfect sense for the terrorists to head straight to Ukraine and try to enter the part of Ukraine devoid of Russian troops and where the border is relatively lightly guarded. it makes no sense for the terrorists to enter Belarus, UNLESS they figured the Belarus/Ukraine border was easier to cross than the Russian/Ukrainian border. for someone still figuring out who the Allies were in WW2, this is like advanced calculus, I know.
1
@bonnie7898 to someone who can't grasp basic logic, anyone would sound like a 12 year old to you. but here goes for a third time, to see if the penny drops. it makes no sense for the terrorists to enter Belarus (an ally of Russia) UNLESS the idea was to rapidly pass through Belarus and into Ukraine through a relatively unguarded spot. you re aware that normally there is no border enforcement between Belarus and Russia, right?
1
@bonnie7898 what's the price of eggs in Russia these days? Russian economy in crisis yet?:) learn the importance of exporting commodities.
1