Comments by "duncan smith" (@duncansmith7562) on "TalkTV"
channel.
-
2500
-
629
-
444
-
342
-
201
-
190
-
170
-
159
-
155
-
144
-
113
-
108
-
104
-
101
-
99
-
98
-
94
-
89
-
86
-
80
-
78
-
69
-
60
-
57
-
57
-
56
-
54
-
51
-
49
-
49
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
34
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
@traceymitchell6619 i agree that Orfelia is not an independent witness, but i think it likely that Jay left the airbnb, that she saw him and there was some verbal interaction between them that neither of them understood, and yes, she probably saw Jay 15 minutes later on the road. and Jay's phone pinged the tower. all that means is that jay had walked 15 minutes up the road, and a bit later he, apparently, spoke briefly to Lucy.
beyond that, we know nothing, except Jay disappeared.
i don't get the logic that says Jay must have wandered off the road, slipped and died.
given the drugs and gangs lurking in the background of all this, makes much more sense Jay was taken somewhere else or he walked on to the safe house the 2 strangers had set up for him, if they were on his side.
the 2 strangers are key. are they helping or hindering Jay in all this?
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Come on, Hitchens, don't act the fool. Challenging the legitimacy of a national election is absolutely fine, in fact should be encouraged, when done democratically (as it was) and it is the authoritarians who declare "the votes are counted, we can dismiss all the claims of fraud, quick, declare Biden the winner". That ain't democracy, when just 40,000 votes separated 2 candidates and there was plenty of evidence that certain states, like PA, broke laws when they enabled mail-in voting.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Fractal369 Spain has always been mostly desert. It has changed very little over the decades.
The evidence is against you.
In general, higher levels of COs have started to green the planet. Satellite imagery shows vast areas of Western Australia and the Sahel are greening, and that is wonderful news.
Despite the fact that the planet's population has sky rocketed, weather-related famines have all but disappeared, and there has never been less poverty in the world and more food production, all of this happening as the planet warms.
if you can name me one country suffering from greater malnutrition now than before the industrial revolution, go ahead.
The real climate expert on this is William Happer, and like him, I think it important we keep adding some more CO2 to the atmosphere, as on balance, it benefits the planet.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@antonitaylor2229 my objection was to anyone who thinks they should be GIVEN anything, so my words were directed to whomever used the word "given".
I can understand you didn't "want" to turn to social housing, and I can understand you didn't "want" to turn to foster care for your sister, but sometimes in life we have to settle for things we don't want to do.
The planners didn't screw you over.
You were just naive and ignorant of the system and how it works, or doesn't work.
Hopefully, now, you have learned that UK has no interest in allowing new buildings be put up. The UK has rules and regulations about everything from Green policies to banking restrictions. It's a bureaucratic nightmare. Had you been resident in a go-ahead free market place like Paraguay, you would have been fine, but not the UK.
With a million immigrants a year entering the country, no way you are going to get any special treatment. The agenda is to get a roof over the immigrants' heads, not transfer you anywhere while you were offered social housing and foster care.
at the end of the day, you made life decisions that were really bad for your plans to still live in the UK. No one compelled you to be in charge of 5 kids, so you can look back on those decisions and reflect.
it would be good to know why your request was denied, or why it took so long, but in the UK, such things are normal, not abnormal.
best of luck to you, but there was nothing in your story that was unusual for UK in 2024, totally expected, and you can expect things to get a lot lot worse. Every immigrant housed in the UK will put you down lower on the list of priorities regarding building, planning, and accommodating.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@i_kissed_a_pixie1537 keep in mind, locating a human is quite different from reaching or retrieving a human body. people keep on how the terrain hinders a search. it doesn't.
given that dogs can smell where a human is located, from above the ravine, and given that drones can access almost anywhere these days, locating the body is not the horrendous challenge it once was.
in fact, you couldn't disappear if you tried these days.
the dogs will locate, and the humans will retrieve.
that's IF procedures are followed correctly, which, in this case, they weren't, they were ignored. the question is, why?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@robertgannon-cx2mm you seem confused, as you conclude exactly what I concluded.
what you said initially is untrue.
of course there are other legal means to come to the UK, be it by work visa, student visa, tourist visa, all those other legal means are why we have so much legal immigration.
the only people who risk their lives to come to the UK are those who would not qualify for entry to the UK legally, or those who want the adventure.
the risk is low. nearly all make it across and get hotel accommodation. i would definitely take the risk, the odds are excellent. for many of the men, it's a big adventure. they have loads of money to pay for their big adventure, so, yeah, why not try the crossing? something they love to post on instagram in many cases.
my suggestion of applying for asylum from the UK embassy in Paris would work a treat. while in the safe country of France, there will be no persecution while their claim is processed, right?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stephenjon3502 "used incorrectly". in what way? what should have been done to use it "correctly"?
the "upcoming" Dublin IV Agreement? so, in other words, from Brexit to today, staying in the EU would not have helped one bit in the fight against illegal immigration. you are talking about some vague time in the future!
let's take your example. you are telling me that for every asylum seeker that goes from France to Belgium, France will have to pay 235,000 GBP? we are talking about a Schengen border, where there are no border controls! How the hell does Belgium prove any of its asylum seekers are coming from France, or Germany, or Netherland, or Luxemburg?
Now that our laws are passed in Westminster, and not Brussels, we have the freedom to pass any law we want, thanks to the wise decisions of that 52%. People like you just loved being dictated to by Brussels. Stockholm syndrome.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stephenjon3502 Yes, I have chosen to live abroad, but you talk as if FoM is some kind of unique benefit bestowed on the EU! I have lived in USA, Oman, Bahamas, Mexico, and availed myself of the FoM the world affords. It's not a uniquely EU thing. As I say, you are ignorant about the world and have Stockholm syndrome. You are a Little Europeaner, unable to view the opportunities outside of the EU.
Yes, I want all asylum seekers to apply from their home country, which is the norm for most of the planet. Take a look at what happens to Haitians when they land in the Bahamas and claim "asylum". They are sent back to Haiti immediately.
So, are the Bahamians bigoted for sharing my bigoted views? If the Bahamians are also bigots, sounds like you are making a racist accusation now, but par for the course for someone who is such a bigot like you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@issimondias all you are doing is giving me multiple examples of how reporters distort what is actually said.
I base my information on what Brad actually said, not on what I believe he said .
Within the interviewer's question, she actually asks TWO distinct questions.
1. Did you see Jay's feet slipping down?
and then a follow up question.
2. Did you hear him slipping?
Now, listen carefully to Brad's answer. Brad says NOTHING about seeing anything. Brad addresses ONLY the second question, and confirms he HEARD the sound of gravel, you know what I mean, stones.
The interviewer never pressed him on what he saw. If your point is that Brad's words were repeatedly misreported, I 100% agree with you.
I don't deal with misreporting. I deal with what was said, I recommend you do the same. For example, Lucy never said that Jay was thirsty, Check her precise words!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@georgezee5173 only a fool would believe Liar Lucy word for word! You probably 100% believe her line about the sugary white substance she sells is not addictive and is of the finest quality, right?
it could well be that the 2 strangers did nothing bad to Jay, and it could be they tried to help him, either get him off the island or to a safe house, if Moroccan gangsters are after him. we simply don't know.
nothing in the interview helped with info about Jay's disappearance, but i have a feeling the interviewers messed up by not grilling these guys on why they had linked up with Jay.
the area they are searching is not that large! here in the Pyrenees, people disappear in the treacherous terrain regularly, and are found, dead or alive, in hours, with drones, dogs and helicopters. the weather conditions in Tenerife are perfect, maximum hours of sunlight, they can't find a trace after 12 days because Jay never went there! when they wake up and focus on the crime, or crimes, rather than the disappearance, they will get somewhere.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@FoolsDiary sorry, it's not a question of agreeing with sink or swim, or not. that's like saying you don't agree with the notion of rich and poor. it's a reality, and the question is how to deal with this reality.
In first world countries, there are hundreds of opportunities and safety nets, such as public education for all, NHS, universal credit. yet, despite the taxpayer being forced to provide all that "help", we still get people who do nothing but moan, complain, and get bitter about how life is so unfair. i would suggest all those who have enough money to support war in Ukraine and Green policies set up a volunteer charity to cover all the expenses of those in need. but the funny thing is, people prefer others to contribute, not themselves through charity.
I left Cornwall at a young age because it was clear to me Cornwall is a great place to visit or retire to, but not to make a living.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1