Youtube comments of duncan smith (@duncansmith7562).
-
2500
-
908
-
629
-
601
-
585
-
498
-
486
-
444
-
441
-
430
-
408
-
392
-
356
-
353
-
342
-
342
-
309
-
292
-
272
-
271
-
261
-
260
-
251
-
242
-
230
-
227
-
226
-
224
-
224
-
218
-
218
-
211
-
205
-
202
-
201
-
193
-
191
-
190
-
189
-
185
-
182
-
180
-
170
-
166
-
164
-
164
-
163
-
162
-
159
-
155
-
155
-
154
-
152
-
152
-
144
-
141
-
136
-
133
-
126
-
126
-
125
-
122
-
118
-
117
-
114
-
113
-
111
-
110
-
108
-
107
-
107
-
106
-
104
-
103
-
103
-
102
-
101
-
100
-
99
-
98
-
98
-
98
-
97
-
96
-
94
-
93
-
93
-
93
-
92
-
91
-
90
-
89
-
88
-
88
-
86
-
86
-
86
-
86
-
85
-
85
-
85
-
84
-
83
-
83
-
82
-
82
-
82
-
81
-
81
-
80
-
80
-
79
-
78
-
78
-
78
-
77
-
76
-
75
-
75
-
74
-
74
-
74
-
74
-
73
-
72
-
72
-
71
-
70
-
70
-
69
-
69
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
66
-
65
-
64
-
64
-
64
-
64
-
64
-
63
-
63
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
61
-
61
-
61
-
61
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
59
-
59
-
59
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
55
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
@thorstenvogt6561 Russia doesn't have 25% of its population as Latvian speakers, so there is not the same issue in Russia.
However, where there are significant numbers of non Russian speakers, for example, In Tartarstan, Tartar speakers have equal rights with Russian speakers.
see the difference?
Unless Russian speaking communities in Latvia have the exact same rights as Latvian speakers, then there is discrimination at play, and there will be trouble.
If Latvia were wise, it would insist on no language tests for any of its citizens, period. Switzerland has 4 official languages, Latvia should have 2.
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
@zeffe0528 wrong. in Ukraine, when the recruiting officer comes knocking on your door, you have to sign up and fight. That is why men of fighting age are forbidden from leaving Ukraine. On the other hand, in Russia, men of fighting age are free to leave Russia. It's called "freedom". Yes, Ukraine has many mercenaries signed up. If we count the Wagner group, Russia does too, you just don't hear about them as much. More importantly, Russia has much greater support, economically, from around the world, China, India, Pakistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, all of Africa, Latin America.
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
Bakhmut matters because Zelensky, against NATO advice, poured cannon fodder into his precious "Fortress Bakhmut", sacrificed thousands of young lives for a place most analysts said was not strategically significant, and he lost. Churchill, he is not.
More importantly, we are told the victors are a demoralized, poorly trained, badly led bunch of convicts armed with spades. Well, that is one hell of a victory over the NATO trained, armed and advised lads. For NATO, it is Kabul 2021 repeated, hence the panic to turn to air power.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
@karmakazi apart from Bakhmut, there are quite a few other reasons NATO should be panicking.
1. the sanctions on Russia have failed. there is no evidence at all that the Russian economy is unduly suffering. Indeed, the IMF revised upwards its estimate of economic growth in Russia over the next year.
2. NATO never planned for a long term war of attrition. on the contrary, NATO over the last decade has reduced output of artillery and ammo. Russia, on the other hand, planned for all this.
3. Ukraine is bankrupting the NATO defence budgets. US produces about 250 Patriot missiles per annum! Ukraine used 30 of them just 3 nights ago, and STILL failed to hit the kinzhal that wiped out the Patriot battery!
4. Public opinion is turning against unlimited aid to Ukraine. Already, in Germany, more than 50% of the population are against sending more weapons to Ukraine. As the months roll by, more and more of the people will get fed up of Ukraine.
NATO has failed and has good reason to panic that it is staring humiliation in the face. But then again, after Kabul in 2021, what's new?
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
@JeffreyGoddin she never answered the question! suggested answers "well, really well, spectacularly well, an overwhelming success, a disaster, terribly, total catastrophe, just as we expected, all as planned"
blabbering on about how long the front line is, how hard they are trying, how well the Russians have prepared the security zone is AVOIDING giving an answer.
but glad you thought this was an answer! always easily fooled are you?
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
@AtheistEve the problem is, Russia saw how the USA refused to allow any Soviet missiles in Cuba, and decided Russia had the same right to refuse Ukraine entry into NATO. It is the West that set all the precedents.
the problem is, Russia saw US and NATO military intervention in Serbia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Iraq again, Libya, Syria and the list goes on, so Russia just copied the precedent already set.
When there was a "civil dispute" between Nazi Germany and its Jewish citizens, did anyone have the right to intervene militarily? yes, or no?
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
@traceymitchell6619 i agree that Orfelia is not an independent witness, but i think it likely that Jay left the airbnb, that she saw him and there was some verbal interaction between them that neither of them understood, and yes, she probably saw Jay 15 minutes later on the road. and Jay's phone pinged the tower. all that means is that jay had walked 15 minutes up the road, and a bit later he, apparently, spoke briefly to Lucy.
beyond that, we know nothing, except Jay disappeared.
i don't get the logic that says Jay must have wandered off the road, slipped and died.
given the drugs and gangs lurking in the background of all this, makes much more sense Jay was taken somewhere else or he walked on to the safe house the 2 strangers had set up for him, if they were on his side.
the 2 strangers are key. are they helping or hindering Jay in all this?
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
No, Mike, what is happening in Bakhmut is that a bunch of convicts you described as low in morale, badly trained, and badly supplied, poorly led, are defeating NATO trained, armed and advised Ukrainian battalions. same as happens EVERY time Ukrainian forces fight street by street against Russia.....Mariupol, Popasnaya, Lyzychansk, Severodonetsk, Soledar, Pesky, now Bakhmut. The Russian meatgrinder filling up those Ukrainian cemeteries in remarkably quick fashion.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@Spectre11B 25% of the world lives in India and China. How did those two nations vote?
Oh, sure, St Lucia and Barbados will always cast their votes with USA. They depend on USA. Doesn't mean a thing.
Instead of UN votes, look at actions. How much of the world has refused to continue trading and working alongside Russia?
China, India, Brazil, South Africa, OPEC, Indonesia, all of Africa, Mexico, the vast majority of the world has decided to work with Russia and NOT isolate Russia.
If you had any clue how most of the world views Russia, you would NEVER have bought into this Western delusion of isolating Russia. Western bubble deludes itself.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@passbysimon3095 On my own corruptometer, I would think Ukraine is ahead of Russia. My own experiences living and working in Ukraine confirm the corruptometer. No, I don't want to live in Russia, but I want Russia to win. Yes, I support occupying other countries' lands, just as USA does, and the West in general, when huge injustices and evils have been committed on such land, as Ukraine has committed. We had WW2 exactly that way, to rectify horrendous evils committed on the sovereign territory of Germany, and we occupied Germany.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
exactly so. we are supposed to believe that Jay is so talented, he is able to penetrate impenetrable vegetation, become totally obscured to all drones, helicopter crews, binoculars, search parties, undetected by dogs trained to sense human presence a kilometer away, and then, miraculously, prevent his rotting, bubbling corpse in the heat of summer from attracting the crows for a month! and those of us who scorn this notion are labeled the "conspiracy theorists"!
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@LS_CHIPO21 what information? kill rate? New Atlas, Scott Ritter, Douglas MacGregor, Duran, Ribar, and Ukrainian sources, that freely admit that artillery is fired 6:1 in Russia's favor.
I mean you can believe six times more artillery is raining down on Ukrainian positions than Russian, but somehow, by magic, Ukraine's losses are a lot less than Russia's, but it makes no sense.
let me suggest what you are hearing is willful thinking, just hope, and not based on any logic or evidence
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
in other words, NO extreme weather to report in Northern Europe, Canada, Mexico, Caribbean, Central America, South America, Antarctica, Oceania, Africa, Middle East, and all of Asia minus China.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
I really don't think this is the case at all.
Not sure of the rules in Spain, but usually holding someone on suspicion of, for example, drug trafficking, for 24 hours, is fine. Had the sniffer dogs been allowed in their rental car or villa, something would have been found for the charge to stick.
the problem was, the Police were 100% focused on finding a missing person, not on explaining that crime caused the person to go missing.
a one hour interview was almost certainly directed at what the two knew about where Jay went, what direction, on foot or by vehicle, what Jay was wearing etc. to be deemed "of no relevance to the case" tells you no questions about the background were posed. we all know these two men are more than relevant to the mystery. they are key.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@hape3862 exactly, no worries if someone else's grandma dies. got it.
storage of LNG is full because there is so little storage capacity. it's like me saying my tiny little fridge is packed full, therefore I have enough for winter. it's nonsense. if storage capacity is not an issue, why is more storage capacity being constructed? when winter comes, the LNG can't be offloaded, stored and fed to consumers quick enough. again, that's why, in a mad panic, more storage is being built, but it takes years. full storage PLUS Nordtream working full flow gets you through a normal winter, NOT just storage (why do you think Nordtream 2 was built?). Government paying energy bills with more printed money just adds to inflation and keeps demand high, resulting in higher prices, shortages and rationing. basic economics. you'll see:)
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
well well well, fancy that, the Russians have actually made it difficult for the Ukronazis.
i guess those who convinced themselves the Russian withdrawals from Kiev, Kherson and Kharkov were some kind of Russian defeat on the battlefield, then convinced themselves the same would happen with the great counter offensive! Surprise! When the Russians fight face to face, they win every time! Popasnaya, Mariupol, Severodonetsk, Lyzychansk, Soledar, Bakhmut.....
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
oh dear, how desperate are Western media getting now? without any evidence, they are just hoping the Western sheep will believe that Russia has had enormous losses in Bakhmut and that Ukraine is relatively unscathed.
The score is now 7-0! Russia 7 Ukraine/NATO 0! EVERY time the two sides go toe to toe and street by street, Russia wins. Popasnaya, Severodonetsk, Lyzychansk, Mariupol, Peski, Soledar and now Bakhmut. Convicts and drunken mercenaries, low on morale, poorly equipped, poorly led, defeat NATO trained and armed battalions EVERY time. It;s an embarrassment beyond Kabul, for NATO. losing every time.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@foilhat1138 If your point is that like all political leaders, Putin has said things that appear to be lies, well observed, Sherlock.
However, that doesn't mean it's a really good idea to discount every single thing Putin says. You need to have an astute mind to distinguish when to pay attention to Putin's words, and when to suspect something is less than truthful, but clearly you have no such mind.
On the red line that Ukraine will not join NATO, I advise you to believe those words, given that Putin was prepared to go to war over it.
That said, when you check exactly what Putin said, you will find he did not say that he would "never" invade Ukraine. And neither has Putin changed the constitution. Your ignorance of things Russian is simply astounding.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
so, Nick, true or false, the Ukrainian train system is almost exclusively an electrified system?
so, Nick, true or false, destroying the Ukrainian power grid would severely reduce Ukrainian troop movements?
so, Nick, true or false, just as NATO did in Serbia and USA did in Iraq, destroying infrastructure like the power grid is a basic military maneuver to reduce enemy troop movements?
check your own fact checkers, Nick, use common sense, and you will change your tune
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@olivesama sure. look at the populations of all the world's countries. then see which countries are fine with Russia (no sanctions imposed, all relations with Russia as per normal) and you will see the vast majority of the world is fine with Russia.
Or, you could do it the other way round. look at the populations of the few countries that have imposed sanctions and tried to isolate Russia, compare it to the vast populations of the globe's majority that still work as per normal with Russia, and compare.
But, do you really want me to do your homework for you? Need more help? Here are some REALLY big countries with massive populations. Which ones have taken a stance against Russia?
China, India, Indonesia, Brazil, Mexico, Nigeria, Ethiopia, Egypt, Pakistan, Bangladesh.
Let me guess, you live in a Western bubble and consider a small country like Germany as being of much greater importance than Nigeria?
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@WinterGK the last movements were 3 months ago! the last movements saw Ukraine take nothing. The last movements saw Russia withdraw and give away territory that was too thinly guarded (what Ukraine would do now with Bakhmut if it had a president who was something other than a puppet actor drunk on adulation). The important movements are the ones where the Russian forces and Ukrainian forces go toe to toe, street for street, in a battle to the last man.
So far, those battles have NEVER resulted in a Ukrainian win. Mariupol, Lysychansk, Severodonetsk, Popasnaya, and now Soledar. Every time they go toe to toe, Russia wins, and that is why Kiev and Washington are now in panic.
Slowly the penny is dropping. it's not territory on the map that matters. it's how many fighting men are left, how many weapons are on hand, and who wins toe to toe. Russia wins in all three categories. Enjoy the territory Ukraine regained! It all goes straight back into Russian hands when the last Ukrainian drops dead.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@AkiseAk Ukraine was never a nuclear power, because the newly constituted state of Ukraine that formed following the collapse of the Soviet Union was prohibited from inheriting nuclear weapons.
By international agreement, of the 15 new ex Soviet republics that emerged in 1991, it was decided ONLY Russia would be the successor state with a nuclear capability. "Ukraine" had no say in the matter, effectively, and was never a nuclear power. Same as Kazakhstan.
Question, if your father's car is located in YOUR garage, and your father dies, does that mean that car, by law, is now yours? Yes, or no?
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Yes, in your scenario, if 6 million Brits had fled as refugees, if GB was totally dependent on others for weapons and economic survival, yes, if thousands of GB forces had been massacred in futile attempts to hold back a superior enemy, yes, we would sit down and negotiate, and more than that, we would try to establish the reason for the invasion (things not done yet in the case of Ukraine). In the Falklands, superior force pushed the Argentinians out quickly and decisively. Opposite is true in Ukraine.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
so, we have to wait until the very last words of the report to learn that it was a Ukrainian plane, Ukrainian crew, Ukrainian cargo company. carrying weapons. to......Bangladesh? yes, because in Bangladesh's war with, well, no one, mines and weapons are needed in abundance, now. pull the other one, it has bells on. Russian intel, as always, found their target and executed their plan perfectly.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@@wqsuuhhdrvjj there can be 101 reasons why people don't trust law enforcement, but that is irrelevant regarding how to survive when stopped by the police.
Golden rule: wherever you are in the world, when your car is stopped by the police, cooperate fully. Had Nahel done this, he would be alive now. it is very simple.
you can ask why people don't trust the police all you like, the reasons won't change the magic formula...cooperate with the police respectfully, and you have a very high chance of living to tell the tale. refuse to cooperate, and the chances of very grave consequences, even death, sky rocket. Political leaders and parents need to hammer this message home in the Arab and Muslim communities. Asian communities already learned this, they sre no problem at all. perfectly behaved and respectful. that's why we all knew the name of the criminal would be an Arab name, not a Chinese name.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Spectre11B so, let me understand how this works.
it ALL depends on motivations, right?
so, interference in a domestic situation is absolutely fine if the motivation is "right"?
And who is the referee that decides if the motivation is right? you? me?
Russia had no desire to annex the LPR and the DPR. That is why the LPR and DPR were not even recognized by Russia, let alone absorbed into Russia. In the Minsk Agreements, Russia agreed for the LPR and DPR to remain as autonomous republics but part of Ukraine, so don't give me this "Russia wanted to annex the Donbass" bs.
ONLY when the Azovs started shelling ethnic Russians in Donetsk did Putin, justifiably, consider intervention.
Had the West honored the Minsk Accords, DPR and LPR would be part of Ukraine today.
Now, where else has Russia annexed a territory out of pure lust for more territory? pray tell.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@peabase 1. you have no clue what Russia's losses are, and no idea the degree to which Ukraine's losses are even more staggering, so stop pretending you do.
2. There is no stalemate here, because stalemate does not only apply to territory gained or lost. Other metrics like casualties, weapon supply, ammo supply, morale, etc all come into play. It's not Russia begging incessantly for more supplies.
3. If we accept stalemate as the status quo on the ground, then Russia has won. Crimea remains part of Russia, Donbass plus Zaporozhe and Kherson now form part of Russia, Ukraine is not in NATO, Ukraine is bankrupt and begging, Ukraine is demilitarized, NATO is demilitarized, the Azovs are now killed, crippled or captured, it's Russia that is so close to achieving all its objectives, and not Crimea....or you think in a week or so Ukraine will be marching into Crimea, victorious and jubilant?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
the Zelensky curse: all who back him eventually get booted. Draghi, Johnson, Truss, Marin, Rutte, soon Sanchez, Macron with no parliamentary majority, Scholz's coalition fragile, Biden with a year and a bit to survive.
Putin, like Assad, will survive all those pious Western dopes calling for his ousting. and that includes this dunce Clarke. Once Russia has prevailed, fools like Clarke will be revealed as a total charlatan.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Galopo I'm challenging what to you is "obvious". the "stronger" army of NATO was an absolute fiasco of disorder and defeat last year when the Taliban walked into Kabul. I would certainly question a "stronger" army when the tolerance for masses of dead lads being shipped home in body bags in the West is VERY low, and the West has not fought a war against a hardened professional army for. well, forever! My guess is China and Russia BOTH have stronger armies. "Stronger" economy is doubtful too. This often is expressed as "Russia has the GDP of Italy"..yeah, but Russia exports what the world needs, precious metals, oil, gas, coal, food....Italy doesn't. I would say value of exports is more of a factor than GDP, as Western nations are now discovering with their misguided sanctions. Many people emigrate to Russia..from Ukraine (DPR,LPR), Belarus, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kirghizia, Tadzhikistan. Flow of immigrants, to a great extent, reflects the ease of entering a country rather than desire to enter said country. Maybe one test of who is fitter is who different nations ally themselves to. Recently we have seen how most of the globe, in defiance of Western arm-twisting, have kept relations and trade with Russia open and flowing. There has been reluctance to follow the West's lead, and willingness to ditch petrodollars and SWIFT and many other Western systems. My gut feeling is that the world has changed, and the West is now in its death throes of dominance. it senses the globe is shifting toward China and Russia and is panicking. The West has lost a LOT of its fitness! One clear example, AMLO recently led a mini boycott of US policy at the OAS conference, Mexico dropping out because USA refused to allow Venezuela, Cuba and Nicaragua to attend. Just not sure BRICS and developing countries view the West as fit to lead anymore.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@flopoz2575 1. No self-declared fascist is allowed to enter the Russian army. Russia lost millions fighting the Fascists in WW2, and does not abide by admitting Fascists into its ranks. Of course, there are a small number of Fascists fighting for Russia, but that is despite the Kremlin's policy, not because of its policy.
Ukraine, on the other hand, reveres Bandera as a national hero and embraces Nazis into its ranks. whether those Ukrainian nazis invade others' territory or not doesn't change the fact they are nazis given official welcome and embraced by the Ukrainian government.
2. Ukraine is far from being a democracy. there are no opposition parties allowed in the Rada, and Zelensky has cancelled elections for 2024. Putin, on the other hand, has to deal with opposition in the Duma every day, from the likes of the Communist party, and it is Putin standing for re-election again in 2024.
3.Some of us have worked in Ukraine and seen the Banderites up close. Unless you have, STFU
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@johanhirte9661 1. Correct. Japan and Korea are not BRICS countries. Who said they were? However, both Japan and Korea produce machinery, engines and vehicles that rival Germany's and are competing most favorably with Germany. Remember, I was replying to the observation that Germany produces "the best" machinery.
2. Correct, US and Japan are big rivals of Germany, and right now, investing in both USA and Japan would look a whole lot wiser than investing in de-industrialized, green obsessed, recession hit Germany.
3. Investment decisions are based on anticipated, future growth, NOT on the current situation, so describing current stats is irrelevant. it is the trend and the future that is of concern.
4. small in volume CURRENTLY indicates a possible great opportunity for investment!
5. Clearly you have learnt nothing from the Ukraine conflict. Russia is absolutely massive when it comes to the world economy. Only the West has failed to grasp this.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Dylanesque AHHH, so you finally admit that there are MANY factors in how a price of any good or service is determined! Well, well, well!
So, logically, all those SAME factors that make Costa Rican bananas cheaper than Spanish bananas in Spain will affect ALL trade between any 2 countries.
So, logically, pointing to ONE factor, Brexit, and saying "that ONE factor explains everything" is clearly ridiculous.
Thank you for highlighting why your dumb mantra of "it's brexit, it's brexit" is pure bs.
Now, as to your figures, explain how these figures are calculated, exactly. over what time frame, for example.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@chaoticneutral6729 oh yes, some BIG concerns.
Let's take Donbass.
Quite common in the Donbass to find communities where 90% speak Russian, so 90% of the students speak Russian, 90% of the teachers speak Russian, but under Ukrainian law, ALL high school classes must be conducted in Ukrainian, a foreign language for 90%.
facts are inconvenient sometimes, right?
now, you were saying, cow, speaking Russian is allowed in all classrooms?
We see why the Donbass and Crimea decided to split from Kiev.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@sebastianwrites Putin has indeed invaded Chechnya. And today? Chechnya is at peace, and the Russian speakers there have equal rights. A success. Yes, Putin invaded Georgia, and today? Georgia lives in peace, with the Russian speakers of Abkhazia and South Ossetia have autonomy and full rights restored. A success. Syria was not invaded. Russian forces came to assist the, what is your phrase, "sovereignty and territorial integrity" of Syria, helping the government defeat al Qaeda terrorist groups (which no doubt you support with your warped sense of right/wrong side of history). You missed Transnistra...Russian peacekeepers there have established, wait for it, peace, and Moldova and Transnistra live side by side. Now, the same will happen in Ukraine. Russian forces will re-establish full rights for Russian speakers, and once dictator Zelensky surrenders, peace will be restored and Russian speakers will have equal rights. Ukraine, in due course, will follow the pattern of being a Russian success. What is hampering such progress is the attitude of sheeple fools like you that know nothing about history and the truth of Ukraine.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@VINLAND_777 1) 1945 = USSR, NOT Russian Federation. FAILED
2) 1970 = USSR, NOT Russian Federation. FAILED
3) Budapest Memorandum was made null and void when the clause that ensures security talks whenever any side has security concerns was IGNORED by the West last December. FAILED
4) Any official referendum on Ukrainian independence was made null and void by the 2014 coup, which saw Ukrainian sovereignty thrown out the window and a US puppet state installed, by force. FAILED
So, dear USA and NATO, do whatever you want on your own recognized territory (which is big enough already) and leave IRAQ, AFGHANISTAN, SYRIA, LIBYA, SERBIA, and the rest of the planet ALONE, FINALLY!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@qrsx66 Looks like English is not your first language, or reading comprehension is not your forte.
If you can't understand the difference between "taking land" and "accepting land that was offered", then I can't help you.
A small part of Palestine was proposed as a Jewish nation by the British, who were given the Palestinian Mandate after WW1 by the League of Nations. This offer was subsequently backed by the UN, who recognized Israel as an independent state. You can't rewrite history.
I don't consider the UN as a supreme arbiter of justice, but the majority of the people in power do, hence the vast majority of the planet, including some Arab states, recognize the right of Israel to exist, as a Jewish state. You are in a small minority.
Yes, Palestinians have the right to defend whatever they want to (remember, Israelis are Palestinians too, they live in the part of the globe known as Palestine). And after 3 wars between Israel and the Arab world, Israel has won 3 times. Palestinian Arabs are entitled to fight a fourth war, and lose for a fourth time if they choose to, but it won't help the Palestinian refugees at all.
Curious that you always support the weak.
What I recommend you do is support those who are morally right, not the weak, otherwise you might end up supporting the likes of the Ku Klux Klan, who, at the moment, are a very weak organization.
2
-
@qrsx66 There are plenty of examples of countries being established to fit the demographics on the ground.
Both Pakistan and Bangladesh were established as separate from India, to reflect the Muslim majority in those 2 countries, and whole migrations of people were set in motion to accommodate this aim. No refugees, as in the Palestine situation. Hindus moved into India, Muslims moved into Pakistan and Bangladesh. The UN accepted this relocation of populations and the new states it created.
Where you are right is that it is rare that countries are formed by mutual agreement of 2 radically different peoples. Usually it is all settled by war. So, for example, Germans living in what is now Poland were ordered by the victorious Allies to relocate to within the borders of the new Germany, as drawn by the Allies in 1945.
What is amazing is that even though Israel has won 3 wars against its Arab neighbors, it STILL seeks to accommodate Palestinian Arabs, rather than just commanding and forcing them into an area the borders of which Israel, and Israel alone, has established.
Israel has been too generous.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@lupus3824 you are very confused, so let me straighten you out.
No one is committing genocide in this conflict. The Azov Nazis were not trying to eliminate all the Donbass Russians, just compel them to rejoin Ukraine. The Russians are not committing genocide in Ukraine, otherwise you would see millions dead by now.
Now, tell me, which Russian individual ever accused Ukraine of committing genocide?
No one has ever said "Ukraine is basically all Russian". What has been said is that, historically, Ukraine is part of Russia. Remember, Britain fought the Crimean War against Russia, not Ukraine.
Only in very recent history has Ukraine been a separate country, and that due to the 15 republics as constituted by the Soviet Union, not for any cultural, historical or linguistic reason.
you have so much to learn on the topic.
in the end, Ukraine will have wished it went ahead and promised neutrality and let the Donbass Russians become part of Russia. You'll see.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@sallyal5266 ooooh, that's such whole-hearted support, a nice little road trip to pose as heroes, staying in 5 star hotels along the way, getting lots of press coverage, SUCH a sacrifice.
listen, honey, "supporting Ukraine right to the end" is not a one off, narcissistic road trip. As I said, "right to the end" is volunteering to get shot in Chasov Yar.
what i did for the war is of no relevance, given I'm not blowing my trumpet about any 3 day road trip. get real.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
"The Ukrainians are still going forwards:..yep, and Ghost of Kiev is real, Snake Island was a heroic stand to the last man, the sanctions are working, inflation is transitory, the euro has lost no value but the rubles has collapsed, Ukrainian losses are minimal, Ukrainian economy is buoyant, all 6 million refugees are heading back to Ukraine now, 70,000 people took to the streets of Prague over the weekend to support the sanctions, and one of my best friends is black.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The Zelensky curse strikes again. the more a leader supports Zelensky, the more likely that leader gets kicked out. Mario Draghi, Boris Johnson, Liz Truss, Sanna Marin, Macron is a lame duck president, Mark Rutte, soon to go.....Pedro Sanchez, Rishi Sunak, Joe Biden, the fragile German coalition, Zelensky himself. Putin will be the last man standing. We saw Assad survive all those that said he must go. Same will happen with Putin's detractors.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@hugoc2660 sorry, I answered the bit about the money, but not the soul.
Yes, Putin very much has my soul. Best world leader by far. Unlike someone like Biden, Putin's academic qualifications are outstanding, his analysis and insight truly impressive, and he stands up for Russians and ethnic Russians admirably. That's why he has so much support, at home and globally. BRICS, OPEC, Latin America, Africa, Asia, all very happy to work with Putin.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@donut2111 we are talking specifically about a kid driving without a license, in a stolen car, criminal record, already just narrowly avoided killing a cyclist and a pedestrian, refusing to cooperate with police.
a drunk driver who is under age, has no license, in a stolen car, who just narrowly avoided killing someone, who is then stopped, but refuses to cooperate and drives off while Police are trying to effect an arrest, would, i believe, be shot at in almost every country on this planet, and rightfully so. take it or leave it. Nahel richly deserved his trip to paradise.
what is truly disgusting is that you sanction behavior that puts so many innocent people at risk.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@brianwarburton4482 we had stable relations before, not good. we coexisted. Putin was never happy that NATO still existed even though the Soviet Union was long gone, and that NATO insisted on expansion towards Russia. Putin, rightfully so, was dismayed that the West did NOTHING to implement the Minsk accords and stood back and watched their man, Zelensky, shell the Russian speakers of the Donbass. Putin tolerated a lot, things were more or less stable. The straw that broke the camel's back was NATO refusing to talk about Ukraine's neutrality. Putin realized that the West would not listen to Russia's concerns, so he was forced to act. The West threw away a path to peace. Very sad. Biden, Johnson, Macron...not able or willing to listen to Putin.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
oh, oh, a realization that Russia can't be kicked out of Ukraine?
But Ukraine is winning, we were told. Putin is dying of cancer, we were told. The Russian economy is in tatters, we were told. The Russians are running out of weapons, we were told. The Russians use drunken convicts and mercenaries, we were told. The Russians are so poorly equipped, they have to use shovels, we were told. Suddenly, after the very best of NATO training and top notch weapons, Ukraine can't win?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@darrellcrook6334 just curious, would you say the thousands upon thousands of Jews expelled, over the decades, from Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Arabia, Yemen, and many other places, were they displaced too, with no right to return to their homeland?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Vanderearden indeed, the topic is civil unrest in France, but you decided to interject "police state" into the conversation. you steered away from the topic and created a new narrative by talking of a police state.
I introduced Japan to see if you would recognize the fact that there are PLENTY of NON police states on this planet that hardly ever suffer from the mayhem, looting, rioting, burning, carjacking, shootings we see in France and many Western countries.
There are.
So, what is their reason for success?
No, France is NOT a Police state. not at all. I have lived here for over 20 years and had a handful of interactions with the Police, including being stopped by traffic cops in Paris, at Perpignan train station, driving over the border with Spain, and it has always gone well. I have seen so many positive and non confrontational Police actions here that I'm left impressed. but then again, I am respectful and cooperative. Nahel wasn't.
Among the masses here, the big complaint is that France isn't enough of a Police state, in that it is clear the Muslim neighborhoods have been ceded to the local gangs, because what is the point in applying the law in such areas when all that results is mass protests and violence? Many in France talk about the disappearance of a police presence.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Vanderearden again, child, you assume too much. you pretend to know my designs.
obviously i give you limited information. the nature of these exchanges is they can't include every thought I have on any given subject. you would be reading pages ceaselessly.
i am no victim and I don't seek victimhood, but for sure, you assume far too much without reflecting on exactly what I say and what I don't say. It's a skill you really need to develop.
The paying taxes one, let me help you out here, was designed to be the best example of a dichotomy, a genuine "either/or".
Broadly speaking, most people pay taxes because they are compelled to do so, by law, they do so unwillingly. There are a smaller number who do so willingly, assuming it is for the greater good of society.
whether I pay my taxes willingly or unwillingly is not the point.
the point is that the vast majority pay their taxes unwillingly, but they accept the fact they must, otherwise the agents of the law will come to arrest them. just one of the compromises we must make in life.
that doesn't mean such obligations put us in a "police state". it is just reality.
Back to Nahel. No one ever explained to Nahel that in such circumstances, it is best to comply, even though you disagree, because the consequences on non compliance are terrible.
you do the same thing every day in your life. yet for some bizarre reason you seem to think unless we all have perfect freedom do to as we wish, that somehow means we live in a police state!
why do you think Japan doesn't have the kind of problem France is now experiencing? Nor Russia. Nor Poland. Nor Taiwan. (psst, hint, homogeneity and respect for the law!)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@lauravilsone5554 maybe you should have done your homework before trying to ridicule me!
now you want me to do your homework for you?
to start your project, google "language policies in Ukraine"
as you dig deeper you will find there are several spheres where only Ukrainian can be used, even in Russian speaking areas where both speakers are Russian!
One such sphere, where only Ukrainian can be spoken, is in the sphere of medicine, which includes pharmacies. So, by law, in Donetsk, a 90% Russian speaking oblast, by law, a Russian speaking customer would have to ask the Russian speaking pharmacist for a prescription and advice in a second language, Ukrainian.
slowly you will understand why Donbass Russian speakers want nothing to do with Kiev ever again.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Joelmonterrey keep track of the score, Joel! Russia 6 Ukraine/NATO 0!
every time the two sides go toe to toe, street by street, Ukraine/NATO loses! Popasnaya, Lyzychansk, Severodonetsk, Mariupol, Soledar, Bakhmut.
NATO arms and training can't even get one win!
Low on morale, poorly equipped, poorly led, convicts and drunken mercenaries keep winning, every time!
explains how the Taliban humiliated NATO into that embarrassing panic of an exit from Kabul in 2021, right?
but good to know your country has plenty of ammo! not that changes anything at all! dream on.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
LIE AFTER LIE AFTER LIE FROM UKRAINE. It's sickening. Russia is abiding by the agreement (no attacks on THE PORT area during TRANSIT of grain shipments), Russian subs have TOTAL control of every vessel that sails in and out Odessa, Russian Black Sea fleet controls everything in and out of the Bosphorous, Snake Island changed nothing, Putin demanded demining of Odessa coast, such demining has started. Putin demanded ALL THIRD COUNTRIES be allowed to import Russian oil, sanction free, he has won that. Putin demanded all rail transport between Kaliningrad through Lithuania be allowed, he won that. Putin demanded ALL Belarus and Russian food exports and fertilizer exports be formally recognized as sanction-free, he won that. There never was a Russian blockade. The African Union and Sri Lanka RIGHTFULLY blamed the Western sanctions for the food crisis, and pressure from them pushed the West to capitulate. TOTAL WIN FOR PUTIN. Just more lies from MSM and Ukraine.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@alejandror.planas9802 depende del lugar donde te encuentas y con quien quieres conversar.
si te encuentras en Barcelona, donde todos hablan y entienden castellano, mejor usar castellano. si te encuentras en Lisboa, donde todos, o casi todos, hablan portugués, mejor usar portugués....aunque en general los portugueses entienden castellano bastante bien.
si no hablas castellano, en estas situaciones, mejor usar inglés, el idioma universal.
solamente cuando te encuentres en un lugar donde solamente y unicamente hablan catalán (tal lugar no existe) es el catalán util.
si quieres aprender catalán por otro motivo, está bien, pero en cuanto a la utilidad de un idioma, catalán no sirve para nada.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Lorne.Mccuaig And now all the important stuff you absolutely refuse to state.
Canada has lost FAR MORE of its forests to fires in the past, and globally, far less damage is done by forest fires today than a century ago.
China just smashed its warmest day on record is another way of saying China is nowhere near the hottest day it suffered before records began, and that the rest of Asia has NOT seen any records broken to date!
BTW, given that Climategate and "hide the decline" showed Mann, Jones and co rig the numbers to fit the narrative, why do you believe the data?
Antarctica has the lowest sea ice on record, is another way of saying the Arctic is doing just fine.
The Middle East is ALWAYS in exodus from the heat. I used to live in Oman. Nothing has changed there.
People like you believed the experts that said, 25 years ago, that by today Florida would be under water! Florida, Bahamas, Maldives, all doing just fine.
Quit the hysteria and look at it all globally, not what the media feed you to panic you.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@CelticSaint exactly so. insisting that they are "of no relevance" and leaving it at that, when there are so many questions involving them, is just bizarre. i can only think they are informants and their cover can't be blown for whatever reason, but it is all so strange.
yep, so, if Lucy had a good idea where the airbnb was located, and if she drove up that way and if Jay stuck to the road, or close to the road, there is an excellent chance she would have seen him. in fact, really bad luck that she would have missed him.
BTW, scouring the Spanish language press is fascinating. all kinds of details are quite different. Just now on UCO Digital I read that the search has not ended, but switched to the capital, Santa Cruz de Tenerife!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
just hysterical that these Mallorcans, who advocate for the EU, are now waking up to the horrors of the EU, freedom of movement, freedom to buy housing there and price out the locals, freedom to stay forever in Mallorca, the locals have lost their housing, their streets, their beaches, ha ha. EU freedom of movement is ruining you, Mallorca. Keep voting for pro EU parties to complete your ruination!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Sowell danced around this key question somewhat.
Certain races, no matter where they live on the planet, score higher on IQ tests than other races.
Chinese students in China, N America, Europe, Malaysia, score better than the others.
Could this be genetic, in part? Sure. Why expect, after millions of years of evolution, for all races to arrive at the same point, mentally?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@hendrixinfinity3992 just to give you an idea of how the world works, the free market is the default position and starting point of all societies. The more a person advocates for government interference and government regulation, the more that person moves to the Left. In general.
In general, a Lefty believes in government intervening to attain ideological, egalitarian goals, and the ends justifies the means (hence Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, Mao were all Lefties) and proponents of Laissez Faire, market economics are right of centre (Milton Friedman, Reagan, Thatcher etc)
The nine words a conservative dreads, "I'm from the government, I'm here to help you"
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@PeterSedesse what should really concern NATO is that after arming and training the ukronazis for the last 9 years, and after pouring in so much high tech weaponry, whenever the two sides face each other toe to toe, street by street, the Russians win, every time. whether led by Chechens, DPR, LPR, Wagner demoralized and poorly trained convicts, same result, ukrobazis lose. Mariupol, Soledar, Severodonetsk, now Bakhmut. Ukraine always loses head to head.
that is what is causing panic among NATO leadership. and rightfully so.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@rappakalja5295 I certainly do understand that there are some people on this planet who don't want there to be a war. Nearly all people I would guess (the Aidar, Tornado and Azov Ukrainian Nazis would be the exceptions, agreed?). I would imagine that nearly everyone wants NEITHER Ukrainians NOR Donbass Russians, NOR Russians to suffer. (again, Ukrainian Nazis probably an exception). These people who so dislike war might even, gasp, go and help ALL the victims of this war, the Donbass folk shelled by Ukraine for 8 years or those shelled relatively recently in Ukraine. People like Urey, due to the biased media coverage in the West, always seem to choose the victims in Ukraine and not those victims in the DPR or LPR, to run and help. On the other hand, biased media coverage in Russia will mean all aid and humanitarian assistance from Russia tends to be directed to the Donbass and other Russian speaking areas. gasp! Given that you support Ukraine/Nazi aggression, and presumably you have for the last 8 years, i know this is so difficult for you.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bonnie7898 No agitation from me, though I suspect you are immensely frustrated that I have to keep schooling you on the basics.
I never said that I don't know if the people were given a choice about the invasion of Ukraine. You must have me confused with someone else.
What I said was that leaders try to reflect the collective mind of their people. Some succeed, some fail.
Putin believes that the majority of Russians approve of the Ukrainian invasion, as I do, and as I think most Russians do, but without a referendum, who could be certain?
A roasting from so many commenters? For sure, there are thousands who are as ignorant as you about the Ukraine situation, and many of them share their ignorance in their comments, but that is hardly a roasting!
Slava Rossiyi, Slava Donbasu, time for Zelensky to retire to his villa in Italy. Russia has won.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@permissiveanalogy2565 I am asserting that Greece sent money to the EU and the EU sent money to Ukraine, so Greece sent money to Ukraine indirectly and Greece sent weaponry directly to Ukraine, if you understand the difference between "indirectly" and "directly". And I am right.
Ah, yes, you are right, Greece is no longer a sovereign nation, so once it has been compelled to send its cash to the EU, it has no say on how such a contribution is spent. Yes, I see what you mean, Greece has sent money, indirectly, to Ukraine and can do nothing about that, thus its infrastructure has to go to ruin because Greece is powerless to change such arrangements. well pointed out. Greece is totally unable to demand a reduction in its contribution in order to improve infrastructure so that loads of people don't die in train derailments.
"Vehicles are replaced for free"
oh dear! someone who never grasped Friedman's "there is no such thing as a free lunch"
I guess the debate ends there. sweet child, nothing is for free, and everything has a cost.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@farkoskupi4267 Russia already has a motive to attack Moldova! Transnistria is home to ethnic Russians, but thankfully, Transnistria has broken away from Moldova and the peace there is guaranteed by 2000 RUSSIAN peace-keepers! If NATO decides to push Moldova to confrontation with Russia, then Moldova will receive the same treatment as Ukraine, and deserve it.
I remember Georgia VERY well, do you? BOTH Abkhazia and South Ossetia are home to ethnic Russians, Russian speaking areas, and like Ukraine, Tbilisi imposed nationalist policies on those areas that marginalized Russian speakers. As with Ukraine, Putin responded to defend the rights of those Russian speakers, and was right to do so. Today, both Abkhazia and South Ossetia live peacefully under the Russian umbrella and things are fine. Lesson learned? Poland has no Russian speaking minority, so no need to fear Russia. Latvia is the one that should be concerned. Latvia has a sizeable Russian speaking population that is being discriminated against. Latvia is the one edging toward getting the Putin treatment. Treat ethnic Russians as equal citizens, and Putin has no problem with you. Simple as that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@alanbellas513 So, there is no system of canals that allows vessels to move from the Caspian to the Black Sea? Sure about that? or want to reconsider your answer before making a fool of yourself?
Your point was that Russia cannot get its ships into the Black Sea without Turkey's approval. Not for the first time, you are wrong.
I know that Russia DOES transfer ships from the Caspian to the Black Sea, thus I know that Turkey has limited say and ability to control Russian vessels entering the Black Sea.
The whole conference that just happened in Ashkhabad was about Russia and its Caspian allies maintaining the Caspian open to only "friendly" countries.
So, I know that sarcasm is a tough one to spot for some people, dear Alan, but it was a sarcastic question...would Turkey have much of a say on Russian vessels entering the Black Sea from the Caspian Sea?
The answer is that Turkey, a lukewarm NATO member anyway, KNOWS that Russia can get its Caspian fleet to the Black Sea, so Turkey is bloody unlikely to kick up a fuss about Russian vessels using the Bosphorous.
Also, check out how many billions of euros Turkey receives from Russian tourism. Erdgogan ain't gonna lose all that over restricting Russia's Black Sea access. Thought all this through, have you? or you get all your info from Sky News and BBC?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Muzakman37 sadly, as a brainwashed, deluded member of the sheeple swallowing Western media lies, you only THINK you know what the Kremlin thinks. You are 100% mistaken as to why I choose to express how I think of events in Ukraine. You are ignorant of my motivations. 100%. It is clear you don't care what the Kremlin believes...if you did, you would actually understand the reality of the situation, There was no attempt to take Kiev, or storm Kiev. There was no attempt to take Kharkov or storm Kharkov. What could possibly be the benefit of that? It's called "fixing"..you pin opposition forces in a limited area, a cauldron, while major operations (Kherson, Zaporozhe, the land corridor) can proceed unfettered. Along with the "storm Kiev" lie you probably believe the Ghost of Kiev is real. Such a shame you are ignorant of basic truths.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Come on, Hitchens, don't act the fool. Challenging the legitimacy of a national election is absolutely fine, in fact should be encouraged, when done democratically (as it was) and it is the authoritarians who declare "the votes are counted, we can dismiss all the claims of fraud, quick, declare Biden the winner". That ain't democracy, when just 40,000 votes separated 2 candidates and there was plenty of evidence that certain states, like PA, broke laws when they enabled mail-in voting.
1
-
1
-
1
-
"no one knows the death toll, but it is high"
let that sink in. the media have pushed this nonsense for so long, even the dumbest sheep are beginning to see through the charade.
tanks are needed immediately, even though Russia is on the back foot, sanctions are working, Russia is isolated, Russia is poorly led, with poor equipment, low on morale, out of missiles, yet its convicts routed NATO trained battalions in Soledar. hmmm
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
MASSIVE MASSIVE WIN FOR PUTIN! All along, Putin has argued for the demining of Ukrainian ports..these agreements are the first steps to that end. Putin has insisted there was never any Russian blockade..he was proven right. All along Putin insisted on clear stipulation that Russian food products and fertilizers and those of Belarus be sanctions exempt, and HE NOW HAS THAT! Putin insisted it was Western sanctions causing the food export problem, the Global South agreed and pressured the West, and again, the West capitulated. On top of all that, the agreements confirm Russian oil can be exported to third countries without limits, so the West can now buy Russian oil from middlemen, like Saudi Arabia or India, no problem, The West can avoid its own sanctions. Beginning of the end, the West in full retreat, Putin on the way to complete victory
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@krakhedd Russia, unlike Ukraine, has not mobilized. it is fighting with a peacetime army, so the vast majority of Russian troops, unlike Ukraine's cannon fodder, is a volunteer force. You and I have no idea how many "feel" forced to be fighting, on the Russian side. The mass of recent desertions on the Ukrainian side would indicate absolute despair on their side. As with all Ukrainian allegations, the reality is beneath the surface, one only need possess a modicum of intelligence to clearly discern it (Ghost of Kiev, heroic stand on Snake Island, no weapons and troops in residential areas)...at least i gave some specific examples!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@petertwiss4215 it's a price worth paying? Not for the old folks who will freeze to death! Not for the businesses that go bankrupt! Not for the people like me who support Russia. Oh, you mean it is a price worth paying for YOU and the elite who can ride these financial crises no problem! I get it, it is a small price for Peter, therefore we should all suffer happily. How totally insular of you to think that Europe's payments to Russia fund the war! There is another continent on the globe called Asia, and in Asia there are two countries that are massive, and they are both more than happy to buy Russian energy. Just because Europe stops buying Russian energy just means Asia buys more, so the war funding happens anyway, just Europe freezes and goes bankrupt. well done! great win for Europe! Russia is coping superbly. The third world states will be in Europe, with rampant inflation, bankruptcies, blackouts and NO END IN SIGHT! what makes you think it can get better? This could be for a decade thanks to your russophobic arrogance. Renewable technology nowhere near ready to replace Russia's energy exports. Suicide.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@regu6582 mano a mano, every time, and I mean every time, Russian forces and Ukrainian forces battle street by street, Russia wins.
Mariupol, Soledar, Popasnaya, Severodonetsk, Lyzichansk, now Bakhmut, when both sides decide to slug it out, Russia wins.
the Taliban humiliated NATO in 2021 in Kabul. NATO troops, with all of their diversity and inclusivity training, wouldn't last 5 minutes up against Russians, Chechens, DPR, LPR, Wagners. NATO has no balls for a real fight, just talk about supplying others and moving imaginary arrows in direction of desired but unattainable advances.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Vestu 1) Being the invader or the invaded is of no relevance. What is relevant is that when it comes to surviving winter, Russia is supreme at managing its resources while at the same time depriving the enemy of theirs. Zelensky is begging the West to win this by winter, because he knows Ukraine will be out of fuel, cash, and men. Russia is rotating men in and out, is producing ammo in vast quantities and denying the same opportunity to the enemy. General Winter is Russia's friend because the Russians know how to inflict more pain on the enemy in winter than the enemy can inflict on Russia. 2) Stop parroting the nonsense of the MSM liars you watch. Russia conspicuously avoided a march into the capital! Why would such a small force want to get bogged down in a street fight in the capital? Makes no sense. It's called a fixing operation. So much energy, manpower and attention is focused on the capital, the enemy are disabled from fighting in areas that matter. While you were celebrating a Russian "failure" in Kiev, Russia was rolling into and all over, unopposed, in Kherson, Melitopol, Zaporozhe, and up to Mariupol. Took your eye off the ball! Cheering on Ghost of Kiev and Snake Island, forgot to do something about that massive land bridge created between Mother Russia and Crimea! OOps!
1
-
@Vestu yep. you would be terribly wrong to assume that! I am a passionate advocate for the liberation and freedom of the Donbass.
I balance out the coverage I receive as best I can, so BBC, DW, Times Radio to get the Ukrainian side, then RT, Alex Christoforou, the Duran, TASS, Telesur, Hindustan Times to get a more pro Russian stance. More importantly I get first hand reports from my Ukrainian students who I teach on line every other day. My own experiences living in Ukraine in 2018 showed me the extent to which Nazi ideology had gripped the male youth of the country and my time there showed me the absurd lengths of Russophobia reached by Ukraine.
I have also traveled to Crimea and feel somewhat their issues.
I don't have a tv either but MSM is accessible on line, obviously!
Would I be wrong to assume that you have never been to Ukraine and that you have zero first hand experience of Ukraine?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Vestu If you watch RT, you will see the reaction of the Donbass Russian speakers, their absolute joy, at seeing Russian soldiers enter their bombed out towns.."eight years we have waited for you" says a babushka in tears. OK, so you would say they are all actors, the soldiers, the babushka, the family weeping, ALL acting. But maybe you should think, you know, this is the other side of the coin our media deny us. impossible to see such reactions in Western media. You should treat yourself to both sides of the story. Which books should I read professor? asked the naive student "the ones they prevent you from reading and the ones they burn" said the professor. The West banned RT not because of its misinformation, but because of the information it shows the West doesn't want you to see. How many Finnish media show a pro Russian angle to all this?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@qrsx66 again, you don't know the history.
no lands were invaded. the lands were purchased. learn the difference.
And yes, the Arab and Turkish landowners had every right to sell such land.
The moral question you need to consider is if the land sales were right, not the identity who settled such purchased land.
The Arab houses on offer are not those stolen from anyone. It may be an Arab style house, it may be previously occupied by Arabs, it may even have been on Arab soil before one of the 3 wars, winner takes all in war. send me the link to the article you read and I'll enlighten you on the most likely explanation.
Ah, so now the truth is out! You do NOT always back the weak! When the weak are the Klan, you do NOT back them! Only when "the weak" happen to be a group you perceive as weak, and whom you support, do you back them! Fascinating prejudice you have there!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@HallOween-sx5jt I never heard Tommy Robinson obsess on colour, so, can't agree with you there.
Too much homogeneity is detrimental?
So, Japan, Poland, Belarus and South Korea have suffered specifically because of their excess of homogeneity? Wow. That one would be a tough one to prove!
Not sure that states "pick" a religion.
Some states expel religions they don't like, but that is invariably Muslims kicking out infidels these days. I don't see 100% Muslim countries as being particularly stable, do you?
where we agree is that an acceptance of the host state's history and culture is essential. Too many immigrants in Europe have come to replicate their home country in Europe, not to respect the ways of the host. Therein lies the danger.
But I don't see where Tommy Robinson was wrong in anything he said, and Nigel Farage was VERY slow on picking up on the true cause of malaise in the UK. Nigel was too focused on the EU, and not on the waves of immigration.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@staris12 Most neighbors dislike Russia? Not true. Let's go through the list of Russia's neighbors.
N Korea, an ally. China, on friendly terms. Kazakhstan, on friendly terms. Azerbaijan, on friendly terms. Armenia, on friendly terms. Georgia, tolerates Russia. DPR and LPR, allied with Russia and then became Russian. Ukraine, at war with Russia, but was close to Russia 1991 to 2014 (the year of the coup), Belarus, ally of Russia, the chihuahua Baltics. their Russian speaking population feel much closer to Russia now they have seen the fascistic attitude of the non Russian speaking population.
on balance, Russia is pretty much liked. Deal with it, fascist boy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@itheuserfirst3186 intolerance is indeed often born from being aggressed. now you know why the Donbass ethnic Russians, after 9 years of aggression from the Azov Ukronazis, is determined to separate from Kiev.
Russian military interventions since the founding of the RF have been totally justified, because each intervention has been to restore the rights of the aggressed Russian speakers of Chechnya, Georgia, Transnistria and now Ukraine.
RF's neightbors will stop seeing Russian intervention when the neighbors of Russia that insist on aggressiing Russian speakers decide to stop.
Latvia may well get the Putin treatment. Latvia deserves it.
Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan will never be invaded while they, correctly, respect the rights of Russian speakers. Got it?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@chrisd5964 of course temperatures are lower in winter! we are not debating that! we are saying if current winter temperatures are LOWER than normal winter temperatures in Australia, why do you categorize that, automatically, as weather, but a heatwave in Europe, that happens every summer, must be "climate change"? makes no sense, unless you have bought into the narrative of the Climategate charlatans who strived to "hide the decline". remember?
Before commenting, try learning what you are commenting about.
Fools like you thought, 25 years ago, that Bahamas and Maldives would be under water by now. what went wrong? they are both absolutely fine!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
currently, in "civilized, democratic countries" like the UK, 3,500 people are arrested every year for words they write on social media. compared to only 400 in Russia. in "civilized, democratic countries" teachers are fired, or beheaded, for showing a picture of Mohammed in school, but not in Russia. in "civilized, democratic countries" you get canceled if you state "if you have a penis, then you are a man", but not in Russia. your former "civilized, democratic countries" have already collapsed, doubtful there is enough energy to survive winter. Russia is warm and toasty. Get real.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DarkRoomAmbience and now the truth.
1) Russia never tried to capture Kiev. are you crazy? street fighting in a city of 3 million people? so, no, javs didn't prevent anything in Kiev. however, pinning down masses of Ukrainian forces around Kiev and around Kharkov DID enable Russia to seize its land corridor from Crimea to Russia.
2) how many Russian ammo dumps and soldiers were destroyed by himars? try to give a number not quoted from the Ukrainian Ministry of Defence.
3) if all this weaponry "changed the game", how come Russia took Mariupol, Lysychansk, Severdonestsk, Popasnaya, and, with a bunch of convicts and mercenaries, Soledar? Looks like the game changer was arming Russian convicts!
Hope that cleared things up for you, whatever your real name is
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bonnie7898 you missed the news, twice. BOTH POROSHENKO AND MERKEL have confessed that Minsk was never going to be implemented, NOT because of anything Putin said, but solely due to the fact that Minsk was just a mechanism to buy time, to re-arm Ukraine and build up the economy. Check out Merkel's comments in Die Zeit. Now, if Putin has said, SUBSEQUENT to the confessions from Poroshenko and Merkel, that he is not bound by Minsk, that would make sense. So, give me the date and source of Putin's FIRST claim that he is not bound by Minsk, and we can take it from there.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jon1065 to my knowledge, Nazis are not allowed to join the armed forces in Russia. In Ukraine, the Nazis ARE the armed forces, whole battalions of swastika tattooed Nationalists, armed, trained and paid by the state, Right Sector, Tormado, Aidar, Azov. These Nazis backed by corrupt Ukrainian oligarchs led the 2014 coup, Get a sense of proportion! Ukraine boasts streets named after arch Nazi Stefan Bandera. Any streets in Moscow named after Adolf Hitler?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Jc-ms5vv there is no endless amount of evidence! not one single "scientist" has any evidence of climate change due to human activity!
The scientists who actually understand climate and the atmosphere would be Willie Soon, Patrick Moore, Judith Curry, John Christy, William Happer, Richard Lindzen, Tony Hadler, and when you read what these guys have to say, you see there is no crisis.
I have absolutely no fear of extinction at all. I am old enough to remember the "experts" predicting another ice age and old enough to remember Al Gore saying Arctic ice would disappear.
If John Kerry believed his own words on climate change, he would travel the world in planes, would he?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@randallturner9094 it is because Putin listened to all the American rationalizations for invading several countries that Putin decided he would copy the "rules based order" of the West and do the same. Why complain at someone copying YOUR system?
what was USA's tired excuse for invading Iraq? weapons of mass destruction? At least Hitler really did have German speaking people in Czechoslovakia he could pretend to protect. USA had to make up stories about non existent weapons!
yep, i believe there is a chance Putin will invade Latvia, because those Einsteins in Riga thought it was a brilliant idea to do what the Romanians, Georgians, Chechens and Ukrainians did, namely derussify the country and discriminate against ethnic Russians.
so, let's get this done, let the missiles fly and see where the chips lie when London, New York, Berlin, LA are all turned to glass. why not?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tomspencer1364 in 1938 and 1939 Hitler used multiple excuses and reasons for his invasions, from Lebensraum to destiny of the master race.
Putin has been 100% consistent and right. Putin will intervene wherever he can restore the rights of abused ethnic Russians and wherever Russia's security is threatened. and Putin has a backbone and won't back down.
No one in Putin's circle wants to seize Ukraine. An incessant gue'rilla war with Ukrainians that hate Russians on NATO's border is not what Russia wants. Re read Putin's 5 objectives.
Spreading misery and terror is the speciality of NATO....Afghanistan, Iraq (twice), Syria, Libya, Serbia, it never ends, and now the rest of the world is fed up of Western terror, lies, hypocrisy and bullying, the Global South is happy to work with and trade with Putin.
Game set and match Russia.
Now, to the lying butchers of the West, Go ***k yourselves, we've had enough of your murderous ways.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@johnroche7541 so give me the numbers.
you assume Russia has had significant losses. Give me your numbers.
How many Russians dead so far? and what source do you use for your numbers?
No one weeps for all the convicts dead, nor the mercenaries. DPR, LPR, Chechens have done most of the front line heavy lifting.
You might be very disappointed when you learn actual Russian losses, that matter, are very low.
and now NATO/Ukraine has 380,000 Russian reservists poised on the border, many with combat experience in Syria, morale high, the convicts routed the NATO trained and armed Ukrainians in Soledar, but yet, let me guess, you are sure Ukraine will win, right?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@randallturner9094 you used the phrase "at the behest of", which means "asked, ordered, requested to do". check it in a dictionary.
looks like I do indeed understand English. Randall, take a quick look in the mirror....and now you see the one who ain't too sure what "at the behest" means!
So, Randall, both France and UK, 2 NATO countries, bombed Libya. In my book, that is NATO bombing a sovereign country, unprovoked, wouldn't you agree? Maybe, Randall, all of Africa, and Latin America, and the Middle East and most of Asia sees NATO and USA as hypocrites, invading , bombing, attacking, then whining about Russia being the one breaking the "rules based order"?
now do you see why Russia is not isolated but gaining support as quickly as the West loses support?
Let's try the question again, dictionary in hand this time, Randall.
What right did Italy have to request/ask for/order any clearing of air space over sovereign Libya?
1
-
@margraveofgadsden8997 is that rambling twaddle your answer?
Let's try again, and this time, try to answer the question.
If you are right, that Ukraine having nukes does nothing to threaten Russia's security, then conversely, Cuba and Mexico having nukes would do nothing to threaten US security, agreed?
So, in that case, Biden would be absolutely fine with Cuba and Mexico hosting nukes all aimed at US cities, right? or.....do you think Biden might object in the strongest possible terms, a la Putin?
try and answer the question this time, nice though the lecture on ancient Muscovy and Prigozhin the fascist was.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@alanbellas513 as expected, you are totally incapable of explaining what exactly Russia has done that goes against the West's much vaunted "international rules based order".
what you succeeded in doing was equating NATO's actions in Kosovo with Russia's actions in Ukraine. BOTH were totally unauthorized by a UNSC resolution, BOTH were done to support a separatist cause, BOTH brushed aside the sovereignty and territorial integrity of a UN member, BOTH saw the destruction of civilian infrastructure with collateral damage aplenty, BOTH resulted in troops on the ground, a de facto occupation/annexation.
The very fact you fail to delineate any key differences and the very fact that you bluster by saying "Oh, Serbia, that was such a long time ago" means you have no case, and the world sees that NATO is a stinking hypocrite and its rules and words are garbage. QED old boy, now you understand why the likes of me see no difference in Putin's actions and NATO's actions.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tomspencer1364 on the contrary, those with no brain are those who can't see how Putin has galvanized a global movement against the West's incessant bullying, lecturing and hectoring.
With victory, as happened in Chechnya, Transnistria, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Syria and now Ukraine, Putin will see his popularity increase and his stature, globally, enhanced. Only the brain-dead are blind to that.
It will be fun to see all the recriminations in the West once Putin declares victory.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@alanbellas513 as I said, you are not bright enough to see that an "ex" anything means that existence hasn't, somehow, just vanished.
You need help. You make basic mistakes. You should be appreciative that you are being corrected.
So, to recap, the EU still exists, even though the UK is an ex member of the EU.
In the case of the USSR, both Russia and Ukraine became ex members of the USSR, so any Soviet property that ended up within Ukraine was not property of Ukraine at all. It was to be decided, by consultation, what to do with said property. There was nothing for Ukraine to "give up". End of discussion.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@randallturner9094 how can Russia be hypocritical for NOT blocking a resolution for military intervention? Russia believes in military intervention as a general rule. As you do. You obviously didn't notice, it's the pro Ukronazis, like you, that are the hypocrites, wringing their hands at Russia's military intervention, whining about "sovereign Ukraine", "territorial integrity", "unprovoked aggression", "rules based order" yet, clapping and cheering when USA and NATO ignore sovereignty, territorial integrity, unprovoked aggression and a rules based order with regularity and with aplomb.
100% hypocrisy on your side, and the world sees it and is disgusted.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@alanbellas513 Yes, I will keep proofreading your English, and keep correcting your appalling reading comprehension skills. When you step into the ring with me, dear Alan, be prepared for an absolute hammering.
The truth is that Putin is, indeed, copying what USA did in Kosovo. USA chose to support separatists, intervene militarily and thence occupy Kosovo. Russia is doing the same in Donbass.
No, I am not denying that the first Chechnya War was about Chechnya attempting to gain its independence. I never denied such. What I denied was your absurd claim that Chechnya WANTED independence. Completely different. A minority that CLAIMED to represent the Chechen people decided to launch a jihad, in effect, to break away from Russia, but I asked you to cite evidence that this warmongering, breakaway, radical group represented the majority. You have failed, yet again, to prove your point.
Regarding Ukraine, some Ukrainians wanted to move the country towards the EU, some towards Russia. Regardless, in democracies, a pro Russian president would be removed at the ballot box, not by a Nazi inspired coup.
Will correct all your English errors in the next post, so you can avoid getting hammered every time you enter the ring with me.
1
-
@alanbellas513 you are starting to get it!
YES! Putin felt it was totally within the "international rules based order" to bomb a separatist insurrection in Chechnya, because Putin had seen the West do exactly the same on numerous occasions! And Putin was right.
Again, your reading comprehension skills are lacking. Did you complete high school?
I never said that Putin would never have invaded Ukraine if it were not for Kosovo. What I said was that Putin could see from the NATO intervention in Kosovo that doing the same in Donbass would be just the same, thus only a stinking hypocrite could ever complain that Russia was acting outside the "international rules based order". And, again, Putin was right. Only stinking hypocrites wring their hands and cry "Kosovo was such a virtuous intervention, but Donbass is so awful". And you, sir, would be one of those stinking hypocrites.
Wringing your hands over Yemen, are you? Of course not. unless the conflict includes Russia, you couldn't give a monkey's backside who gets massacared.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@alanbellas513 once again, you are struggling with reading comprehension and logic. I will try to explain, yet again.
YES, I am saying that Putin is following the international rules based order of the West. What NATO did in Kosovo, Russia is doing in Donbass.
However, that does NOT imply that otherwise Putin would not be doing what he is doing! You are confusing justification for what Putin is doing with the cause of Putin's actions. Putin is not invading Ukraine BECAUSE of Kosovo. He is invading Ukraine because it is the right thing to do! His justification for claiming he is following the all-important "rules based order" is to point to Kosovo. And Putin is right! Anyone who whines about "rules based order" only has to look at Kosovo and see, in fact, Putin is doing what NATO did.
So, if you want to whine about Putin, whine about USA and NATO in equal measure, but you are a stinking hypocrite, so you refuse to do that. This is the morally bankrupt position such Russophobia and bias lands you in, you goon!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@alanbellas513 do some more research, dear Alan. ALL the Black Sea coastal oblasts are majority Russian speaking! Odessa, Mykolaev, Kherson, Zaporozhe, Donetsk, Luhansk, Kharkov and Dnipro, all of it Russian speaking majority.
Putin never tried to "take" Kiev. Why would he?
Do some research on what a "fixing operation" is. Keep enemy troops pinned down in one area while your main body of troops seize territory in another area (in this case, the land bridge from Kherson to Rostov). Alan, you MUST do some research and learn more! You have been content to just regurgitate mainstream Western media. Do you EVER try to get the other perspective?
Just to repeat, Putin has been in power for decades and has NEVER seized territory other than Russian speaking areas that were embroiled in wars against nationalist governments discriminating against ethnic Russians. NEVER! (Unlike USA and NATO, who attack whomever they want for whatever reason).
The record is there for all to see.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@alanbellas513 so, time to correct one of your many lies.
according to Wikipedia, here are the Ukrainian oblasts with a majority of Russophones:
Crimea, 97%
Dnipro, 72%
Donetsk, 93%
Lugansk, 89%
Zaporozhe, 81%
Odesa, 85%
Kharkov, 74%
Mykolaev, 66%
As I TRUTHFULLY said before YOU LIED in your counter, Putin has never invaded and occupied and annexed ANY territory that was not majority Russophone.
so, in future, stfu about your lying nonsense about "oh, Putin, such a threat to his neighbors and to the west"
Learn some basic truths before entering the ring, cretin.
1
-
@alanbellas513 no one is saying "where Russian is spoken, that's Russia". Hence there is no need for Russia to intervene in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Khirghizia, Tazjikistan, Azarbaijan, Armenia, Belarus and the Baltics. Those countries afford equal rights, though Latvia recently has been going down the Zelensky path of discrimination against Russian speakers.
The point is, where there are Russian speakers and ethnic Russians WHO ARE DISCRIMINATED AGAINST BASED ON THEIR NATIVE LANGUAGE, that is where you can expect Putin to intervene, AND ONLY THERE!
If you weren't such a brainwashed, rabid russophobe you would support him and wake up to reality.
But then again, maybe you believe in rabid discrimination
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@eugenecrabs8622 I am challenging your logic, your assumptions and your hypocrisy.
you really have failed, totally, to justify supporting Ukraine.
It is a total nonsense that Ukraine is some kind of democracy. It is not, and democratic institutions have been trampled on in a way that WW2 Britain would never have DREAMED of doing.
EVERY word you used to justify abandoning democracy in Ukraine would be used by Kim Jong Un for the dictatorship currently in North Korea, so either you need to re-think, or use different words.
The problem is, you can't. you foolishly bought into this nonsense about Ukraine being some kind of democracy, now you are stuck with it.
The sooner Ukraine is crushed the better. * years of shelling the Donbass deserves a Russian intervention and justice, finally, is being done.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tedcrilly46 you are way behind the times!
Norway can't increase production, it's at max! Spain begged Algeria MONTHS ago, maxed out! Azerbaijan, yep, remember von der Leyen smiling after concluding that treaty, but it is a pitifully small addition, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan are sticking with Russia, there will be very little cooperation there.
reserves are plentiful, but not enough infrastructure to get it all out and into households.
Russia doesn't want to be a trade partner with Europe, apart from Serbia, Belarus and Hungary. Europe is not trustworthy, BRICS is the future, Europe needs Russia MUCH more than other way round.
Get ready for blackouts and lots of frozen to death old people! You deserve it!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@VINLAND_777 I interact with all points. You will notice I address all of your points. However, consistent with someone very unsure of their arguments, you refuse to answer my very simple questions, cowering behind your pointing finger of "you're interrogating me". So, before I address your points, let me repeat my questions for the 3rd time! And it's 3 strikes and you're out! If you refuse to answer these oh so basic questions, you have proven you have no argument, in my book. What about my invitation to Zoom with a live Ukrainian who can describe to you the situation there? Yes?
1) the Minsk Accords, signed by Ukraine, and France and Germany. Poroshenko admitted on Ukrainian radio recently that there was never any intention to implement them, because Ukraine could use that stalling time to build up its military and economy. I say this refusal to implement such an accord is a provocation. and you? no provocation, no poking the Russian bear there?
2) "I don't talk about Spain here"....a ha, so you are entirely confident to label the Donbass separatists as fully deserving of a good shelling, but no other separatists would deserve such butchery? So which separatist groups DO deserve a good shelling? Do the Scots? do the Catalans? do the Kurds? Explain. The Donbass separatists deserve all they got, according to you, no provocation there. Simple question, which other Separatists in the world deserve the same treatment? You are a man of the world. No need to hide behind "I don't speak of Spain or the rest of the world here"..illuminate us. Which other Separatists deserve 8 years of butchery?
3) What's your number? My number is ONE. If ONE Donbass civilian is a "casualty" of Ukrainian shelling, that constitutes a provocation, in my book. What is your number? VERY simple question.
1
-
1
-
@VINLAND_777 So, THREE strikes and you are out, simply because you can't answer and won't answer. SO, let me answer for you.
1) Yes, it obviously WAS a horrendous provocation for Ukraine to sign the Minsk accords and then deliberately refuse to implement them. 2) YES, it is absurdly hypocritical to accept shelling and massacre of Donbass separatists but to insist on peaceful diplomacy with ALL other separatist groups in the world, and yes, this is a provocation and 3) Patrick Henry's "Give me Liberty or Give Me Death" rings true with the Donbass separatists, and we should all respect that.
Interrogation over, my cowardly imbecilic deluded interlocutor. Let me know any time you want to Zoom to hear first hand how the Donbass Russian speakers have been treated by the Azov Nazis...in the meantime, please pass on the message to your Ukrainian friends "hey....should have honored the Minsk accords, don't you think?" SLAVA ROSSIYI z
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@FishandHunt and, despite this long list of failures, with low morale, poor equipment, poor leadership, a bunch of convicts and drunken mercenaries routed Ukraine's NATO trained and NATO equipped battalions in Soledar and are doing the same now in Bakhmut.
you tell me, which side failed in Soledar and which side is now failing in Bakhmut, Marynka, Krasny Lyman, Kupinsk?
which side failed in Mariupol, in Popasnyaya, in Lysychansk, in Severodonetsk, in fact every time the two sides go toe to toe, street by street, Russia wins.
it's Russia 5 NATO/Ukraine 0
NATO is pathetic. "we never expected such a long war at this level at this intensity". of course not, NATO, because you are arrogant and don't do your homework.
Chechnya and Syria took years, as will Ukraine. But Russia eliminates its enemies, unlike USA, that waits 20 years in Afghanistan before leaving like panicked school girls and hands everything over to the taliban. pathetic.
1
-
1
-
@FishandHunt Kiev, Sumy, Kharkov, Izyum, Kherson, no street by street fighting.
Kiev, Sumy, Kharkov was a fixing operation, keep Ukrainian troops in place while the land corridor in the south was seized, unopposed. it worked a treat.
Izyum and Kherson no street by street fighting, Russia had stretched itself too thin and wisely withdrew to await more frontline troops (which it now has, 380,000 more).
massive casualties?
give me the numbers and your sources.
Milley said 100,000 Ukrainian dead months ago. what say you?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Pho-King Soup oh, so now your assumption has changed from "Russian" to "right wing loon". my, how quickly your stance changes! 12 years old are you?
Russia is fighting a war of attrition, which means preserving its forces for the long haul. Giving up territory is what happens when you want to preserve forces, and it is what Ukraine should be doing now in Bakhmut.
yep, the big offensive never happened. and Russia has not lost anything of importance. there have been two battles so far, battles meaning where both sides go toe to toe, street by street, Mariupol and Soledar/Bakhmut, and Russia is about to go 2-0 up.
The nazis, by the way, are those who were admitted with open arms in to the Ukrainian defence force, the Azov Nazis, the ones you support. Got a picture of Bandera by your bedside, do you?
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Pho-King Soup once again, you are wrong.
I am a semi retired Brit, currently in Spain, work part time as a teacher on line, some of my students are Ukrainian, I used to live and work in Ukraine, my passion is for the rights of the Russian speaking population in that country, I don't need any income, I write because I love it, and I get a perverse pleasure from seeing ignorant fools like you get so much so badly wrong.
always happy to connect on Zoom to prove you 100% wrong, but cowards like you are too weak to do that, I find.
Keep making false assumptions if you want to remain the epitome of imbecility.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Pho-King Soup I am not freezing in Spain, not at all, and neither is the Ukrainian lady living on the first floor. so what is your point?
if you lie right next to an elephant, all the elephant has to do is roll over, and you die. Cuba has to be very careful with the elephant right next to it, USA. and even when it is careful, Cuba gets told by USA what missiles it can or cannot have on its soil. Ukraine forgot that it has the Russian elephant right next to it, and if the elephant decides to roll over, it dies. The elephant rolled over, and Ukraine is dying, and NATO got no strength to move that elephant away.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@RunOfTheHind While presidential immunity has always been a given in certain circumstances, the boundaries of a president acting in a purely personal capacity, as opposed to in a purely administrative capacity, have NEVER been drawn, hence the relentless to and frow now happening in the Supreme Court.
If things were oh so cut and dry as you claim, there would be no debate.
So, the question of where, exactly, the president is personally liable, or immune, from executive decisions, needs to be made, and it will likely take a while.
You have zero evidence that Trump was trying to hold on to power for himself over challenging the results of what looked like a sham election, because Trump's motives would be in Trump's mind. Not yours.
"for reasons to be established" tells the story.....you have no idea of motive and no evidence of crime.
As Einstein said, "if you can't explain it, you don't understand it", so your ceaselessly whimpering about "it's all in the indictment" is like a school kid asked to explain his homework whining on about "it's all in my notebook". Pathetic, truly pathetic.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@timonsolus exactly...Biden isn't prepared to play the geopolitical game on Putin's terms. So, it will be settled another way. Putin believes he can humiliate NATO to the point that globally NATO will lose all credibility after this Ukraine debacle, and that Biden's refusal to play the geopolitical game will backfire. I think Putin has calculated correctly. Putin wants BRICS, not the G7, to determine things. Putin wants an end to petrodollars, SWIFT banking system, "rules based order" as determined by the Collective West, and Putin wants a multipolar world. I agree with him, and so does most of the world, from what I see. So, the geo political game will be sorted out by other means, and I'm backing Russia to get most of what it wants. We'll see where the chips fall, but for certain, Ukraine will be destroyed as part of Lloyd Austin's aim of "weakening Russia", and that is a terrible shame.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@UnfollowYourDreams 1) I am not the one specifying where in the world is Left or Far Left! That would be YOU! I asked YOU to give that info! My job is to point out you have no idea what you are talking about and to show how absurd YOUR categorization is...which I have done! 2) I asked you to point out what EXACTLY is communist about China, and what EXACTLY is Socialist about Cuba, and how such glaring differences would be apparent in the lives of the citizens of those two countries. You have failed to do that. 3) Capitalism is NOT just about ownership. Capitalism is also about operating a business privately WITH THE AIM OF MAKING A PROFIT! The Chinese government owns all the land, BUT, for a LONG TIME, CCP has been encouraging capitalism, encouraging entrepreneurs to open PRIVATE businesses and MAKE A PROFIT. just like my student opening up his restaurant soon. Like many others, he hopes to become a millionaire, and the Chinese government hope he does too! China, in more ways than Cuba, has become quite capitalist. But as someone ignorant of the reality of the world, you have no bloody clue.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@burns281981 "becoming surrounded" would be accurate. with roads entering Bakhmut from the south, north and east all under Russian control, now, and fire control of much of the western road, we can safely say that Bakhmut is becoming surrounded. With the fall of Soledar to the Russians, with the fall of Opidnoye to the Russians, with the fall of Klyshcheevka to the Russians, we can say that Bakhmut is becoming surrounded.
Ignore the facts on the ground if you so choose, but, sir, the bs is coming from you.
Analyze the gradual progress of Russian forces and currently where the artillery strikes are compared to a few months ago and you will see that Bakhmut is becoming surrounded.
I do not answer questions the premise of which I disagree. Just as you would not answer the question "are you still a retarded imbecile"?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@insaneclownponies9599 start reading some real news, instead of lies!
The Ukrainians have evacuated Kupiansk and surrounding areas because the Russians are poised to take it!
Ukrainians have taken a few fields at the cost of 25,000 losses! In a war of attrition, that is a disaster. At this rate, Ukraine will reach the Sea of Azov, and cut the land bridge, in 16 years! Talking of 16, now 16 year olds are banned from leaving Ukraine. In a few weeks, masses of teenagers will be run through the Russian meatgrinder.
Meanwhile, Ukraine is now begging Egypt for weapons!
what do Russians have to show for their efforts? A totally demilitarized and humiliated West, reduced to sending cluster bombs because there are no more 155mm shells to be had! Low inflation and modest growth (oh, how the UK and Germany would LOVE to be in that position!)
The demilitarization of NATO is a spectacular success for Putin.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
well well well, so it turns out the Russians were firing DISCRIMINATELY, trying to hit those Ukrainian forces ensconced among civilians, and not INDISCRIMINATELY, as we were told. All those buildings with "CHILDREN" written all over them now, it seems, could well have been hosting soldiers and weaponry. Russia was telling the truth, AI confirms, Zelensky and co were lying. Well, after Ghost of Kiev, we knew Zelensky was lying I guess.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bonnie7898 as always, bonnie chooses to avoid answering the simple questions.
let's try again.
if NATO is not demilitarized, why is NATO refusing to supply Ukraine with what it needs? seems your answer is "NATO was incapable of supplying Ukraine's needs because it has been demilitarized (allowed their defence capabilities to run down over time)."
so, again, why? given that this war has been going on since 2014, WHY did NATO allow its stocks to run down? cue crickets.
why did Australia only approve air defence systems for Ukraine LAST WEEK? Ukraine needed this two years ago!
fascinating the mental gymnastics you go through pretending NATO has plenty to supply.
And now, the truth. Nearly everything NATO has sent to Ukraine has been destroyed, and NATO can't ramp up production to match Russia's output, and NATO can't ramp up production in the short term or medium term. That is why NATO is stuck. It is demilitarized and can only promise arms to Ukraine drop by drop, whereas Russia, China, N Korea and Iran have it all on hand right now.
read it and weep, deluded fool.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@serebii666 Kherson was abandoned because supplying the west side of the Dnipr was a nightmare. Good decision, and thousands of ethnic Russians were evacuated out of ukronazi control. mission accomplished to a certain extent.
Kharkov oblast was partly abandoned because the LPR forces manning the frontlines there were very low in number. Russia was way over-stretched there. again, good decision. the kind of good decision that the clown Zelensky SHOULD have made in Bakhmut, but Zelensky doesn't care about saving lives.
Thousands of vehicles were not lost. again, your media lie to you! Ghost of Kiev, heroic defence of Snake Island etc
.Mistakes are made in war, of course, but the truth remains that the Russians had no intention nor need of getting bogged down in Kiev. The objectives were to get Ukraine to the negotiating table, and that worked, and to fix Ukrainian forces and attention around Kiev so that the precious land bridge to Crimea could be established, unopposed, and that worked. live with it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@cherryfressh6188 1) Russia is building pontoon bridges, correct. so what? 2) Ukraine hit a dam, correct. The dam is undamaged and both the road and rail connection atop the dam are fine. 3) Himars already talking, but for the most part it is being silenced with most missiles shot down by the Russians, with only a few missiles penetrating the Russian air defenses. Himars will go totally silent when the ammo runs out! 4) ignore the "talk" of Russian losses, No one knows, so they just make up numbers. Unlike the UKrainians, the Russians don't release such numbers, we know 50,000 Ukrainians are dead, based on Ukrainian numbers. A few more thousand would help demilitarize Ukraine. 5) Russia was never in Afghanistan. Look up the difference between "USSR" and "Russia". 6) I have no doubt you hear about fighting in Kherson. No doubt you hear a lot, including voices in your head. Kherson recaptured by end of August? 33 days left to do it! Already 7 days have passed since you said the counter offensive "was in full swing"! LOL
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@myfuzzyanimals67 sorry to break it to you, but Russia's GDP is more than adequate to do what I said it has done, namely, outstrip NATO in arms production and ammo. You see, Russia allocates resources carefully to win wars. Doesn't waste money on sensitivity training or diversity and inclusion programs, or electric tanks, like the woke, imbecilic NATO. Russia's measly 60 billion a year will be more than enough to win this..hey, when you have the determination of the DPR, LPR and Chechens on your side, anything and everything can happen. just watch!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@a564-c3q Again, you are blabbering on about concepts of which you have no grasp. So, once again, let me correct you, and yes, I have a degree in Russian and Russian Studies and know the history well.
1. You have no idea if the descendants of the founders of Kievan Rus are today in Ukraine, or Russia, or both, or neither.
2. Russia, like China, like Ireland, has existed forever. It is stupid to say that any one place existed before another.
3. "The people of Ukraine are closest to the roots"
They are not.
The people of Ukraine happen to live on the same land as the heart of Kievan Rus. So what? So do all the African students that went to Ukraine to study medicine. Does the fact that African students happen to be on the same land as Kievan Rus mean those African students are "closest to the roots"?
You mistake geographical location for cultural lineage.
Basic mistake.
Are you 12 years old, by the way?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
then that would be by nuclear holocaust, because Russia, rightly so, is going to fight for the human rights of ethnic Russians, wherever they may be, be it Moldova, Chechnya, Georgia, and now Ukraine, and Russia will prevail. Ball in NATO's court. Back Russia to achieve equal treatment for ethnic Russians outside of Russia, or nuclear war.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@donut2111 fascinating you use the US as your example.
we can already see the results of this "let carjackers go ahead and keep carjacking" policy. Crime has risen to horrific levels in the US, and violent crimes like car jacking have grown enormously, so, great, less car chases, more devastating crime.
Look, this is quite simple. Extremely harsh jail terms for those who fail to comply with Police AND repeat the message over and over again, ALWAYS COMPLY WITH THE POLICE WHEN STOPPED, FULLY. If political leaders did this, instead of instantly blaming the Police, we would be in a better place.
The problem in the US is that prosecutors have given up prosecuting and sentencing is light or non existent.
You know, in countries where people comply with the Police, this problem doesn't exist.
Tell me, why do you think this kind of thing never happens in Japan? Why?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@MikeAngel06 so what is the evidence Russia is annexing all of Ukraine? Russia never annexed all of Georgia. The evidence there is that the Russian speaking areas of Abkhazia and South Ossetia would have autonomy. they have that, Georgia and the autonomous areas live in peace. Moldova wasn't annexed, but Transnistria was granted autonomy. ALL the evidence, historically, is that Russia will protect the rights of the Russian speaking minorities, as they should. There is no evidence of annexation. You have only assumed this, fed lies and conspiracies by western media. So by your definition, a sham referendum is one where there are no UN/international observers, right? So, Brexit was a sham referendum, right? oh, wait, so, explain the difference again...sham referendum = not observed by UN/international observers (like Brexit), approved referendum = any referendum the result Mikeangelo likes? Try again. this definition not quite working is it?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@MikeAngel06 Consult with one another if questions arise regarding those commitments.
Questions arose, for Russia, regarding the commitments to the Memorandum. Putin requested talks on Ukraine. The West refused. Yet again, the West disregarded, totally, the contents of the Budapest Memorandum. Now we see the consequences. If you want to follow the Budapest Memorandum, do so, otherwise expect Russia to do what it need to do to restore justice. It's that simple, but I guess your cherished "rules based system" means Russia never gets to interpret the rules, only the West? Hence the globe backs Russia, by and large, because it has zero faith in the West being judge and jury over the rules. Budapest Memorandum is a PERFECT example of this.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ireneswackyjournals8810 it is EXACTLY the same right. That's the problem. The gay lobby want EXTRA rights, not equality or the same rights. No one wants to force a man to marry woman. we just want to offer that as an option, as it has been since the dawn of time. The Biblical definition is the traditional definition, it is accepted by almost all the world, always has been, and is correct. you are part of a small, whining minority that just can't accept the valid views and norms of the world. You are, in effect, xenophobic, hating the ways of foreigners and others, and definitely you are islamophobic, hateful of the teachings of Islam.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@SiobhanIreland oh, it is EXACTLY the scenario you described!
You claimed that one should fight against occupation. Now you are asked to define "occupation".
Many, many Irish people feel vast swathes of their island are now occupied by immigrants. The schools, hospitals, streets are occupied by hordes of immigrants. these immigrants, these occupiers, should expect resistance, even attacks, right?
if not, then distinguish between which kinds of occupation must be resisted, and which not.
Would you support the Catalans in violently attacking Spanish people for "occupying" Cataluña? yes, or no?
Let's see how much history you know.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@futonclutch5040 you miss the point (not for the first time). Odessa is a city founded by Russia, immersed in Russian culture, dominated by Russian speakers. When Russian speakers were rounded up and burnt to death in the Union House by Ukrainian nationalists, NORMAL people (not you, obviously) felt outraged and COMPLETELY understood the demands from ethnic Russians to live apart from such monsters as the Ukronazis. In 1684, had a group of Dutch speakers been rounded up in a building in New York and been burnt to death by British Nationalists, presumably you would have supported the British nationalists ' oh, too bad Dutchies, you LOST your country, it is ours now, conform or die! This is what you expect of the Russian speakers in Ukraine, conform or suffer, possibly die. Shame on you. deep deep shame.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@marilenaganea6578 Ukraine is way beyond the point where it can be saved. 8 million refugees, more than that internally displaced, bankrupt, begging, no reliable power grid, now no air defences, Russia has survived the sanctions formidably and has support from all over the globe, not just China, India, Brazil, OPEC and Africa, it's over. You will know that Zelensky is serious about committing himself to a Ukrainian victory when he has sold his villa in Italy and his mansion in Miami, but he won't. Nothing to stop you sending every last penny you have to Zelensky, but please, don't be a sucker, this one is over.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@iratespartan13 yes, based on the evidence to date, the Wagners and Chechens are competent attackers. Let's look at the evidence. Mariupol, Popasnaya, Severodonetsk, Lyzychansk, Soledar, Bakhmut. Russia 6 Ukronazis 0.
they fought and beat, every time, the best Ukraine/NATO had to offer.
it is absurd to think that Ukraine now has SUPERIOR forces on the battlefield. It is logical to assume that it is the newbies, the forced conscripts that are being shoved into the Russian meatgrinder.
MONTHS ago both Milley and Von der Leyen confessed to 100,000 ukronazis dead. no one has been able to establish comparable numbers on the Russian side, despite trying. BBC and Medusa both failed.
Logically, with shells and missiles raining down at a 7:1 rate in favor of Russia, kill rate will be heavily in Russia's favor, as stated in the leaked Discord dox.
the great prize isn't Bakhmut. The great prize is a bunch of demoralized convicts with shovels, poorly led and poorly supplied, kicked the ass of NATO trained and NATO armed Ukrainian battalions. hence, the panic in NATO and desperation to turn to air power.
None of this is surprising given the fiasco of a NATO performance in fleeing Kabul in 2021.
Grasp reality.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@franckr6159 1) Europe and USA will not look like Oman because Europe and USA will still have plenty of rainfall! Though much of USA DID look like Oman (the dustbowl) in the 1930's when, we are told, there was no global warming!
2) 55 is unliveable? what do you think people do in Oman when it hits 50? They stop work, by law, and the Indians and Pakistanis start playing cricket!
3) your assumption of droughts is nonsense. increased CO2 is GREENING the planet. study some satellite photos. 4) yes, we can adapt, humans have always adapted and even your apocalyptic nonsense would be survivable. stop wetting the bed. 5) get a sense of perspective. some of us have been lectured to about the destruction of the globe due to the ozone layer, acid rain, rising oceans (the maldives are still there, as are the Bahamas, nothing has been washed away). it is all nonsense.
here is a test to see if you have a balanced view.
Name one, just one benefit of an increase in global temperatures.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@franckr6159 no problem, if you promise to do the same. you write down all the disasters you predict, and let's see your grandkids have a jolly good laugh in 50 years. why not? by the way, some people are already having a jolly good laugh at the predictions from 50 years ago! "children will not experience snow again", "Florida will be under water", "polar bears will be extinct", "deserts will be growing" (they are not!)
If more severe droughts existed before GW, as they did, then you need to explain why droughts are caused by GW, and you can't, because your arguments defy logic and are based on hysteria and panic.
There is no evidence that the deaths you predict will actually happen. none. it is all speculation that we have heard for decades, and it is nonsense.
on the other hand, i tell you a fact, that more people die from cold in winter compared to heat in summer, and you just dismiss it as if lives mean nothing.
now then, let's see you answer this one.
what exactly is the relationship between human CO2 emissions and global warming?
if human CO2 emissions increase by 10%, by how much does the average temperature of the planet increase? we know that CO2 boosts crop yields, which is why we should want more CO2 in the atmosphere, but tell me exactly by how much global temperatures go up per one % increase in human CO2 emission.
because if you can't answer that, you can't be sure extra CO2 is a bad thing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rollerrollerichson6258 First, UK should re-open its processing center in Calais.
Second, the UK needs to open no other processing centers at all. Applications can be made at the nearest UK embassy in whichever country the applicant lives, and processed in the UK.
Third, those granted asylum already have safe routes. They are called flights, trains, ferries. You know, the same safe routes you use when you travel?
Fourth, the UK needs no agreement with France whatsoever. Those asylum seekers granted asylum from France will be allowed to leave France. Believe me, France has no wish to keep them! Those granted asylum from other countries will have no need to go through France, as their asylum has been granted, so they may enter the UK directly.
Fifth, the UK is allowed to do whatever the UK Parliament in Westminster has passed into law. It is up to other countries and institutions to debate and protest what decisions they don't like. Westminster decides UK policy, not other places. got it?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Moscow has become an international pariah", well, except for China, a pretty big country, oh and India, another big country, oh and Mexico and Brazil, 2 other big countries, and the rest of Latin America, and Africa, and Asia and....in fact, Moscow has become only a pariah to the deluded, smug, ignorant Western bubble of nations. The usual lies flowing from the disinformation hacks of the BBC....such a bunch of shits, aren't they?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bonnie7898 I am always happy to compare specifics. However, I find you ignore valid comparisons because you have swallowed the "USA/West good, Russia bad" nonsense.
So, let us compare specifics. Simple question. Has Russia invaded the entire country of Ukraine? Has Russia attacked specific hostile elements within Ukrainian society more or less than USA did in Iraq? Give evidence.
In Ukraine, does Russia have support of a proportion of the population? more or less than the USA had in Iraq? Give evidence.
Don't be dumb, and you will come to the conclusion that Russia is doing, in Ukraine, exactly what USA has done in many parts of the world.
But it's good to know you are always, throughout history, meandering around various battlefields with your clipboard, registering who is backing an invasion and who is against it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hans895 My history is solid.
So, let's tackle the points you raise.
1) why, in a Russian speaking area like Donbass, should it be illegal to have newspaper articles in Russian only? No such rules exist in Quebec, Belgium, Cataluna, so why have such diktats in Ukraine? 2) Why, in a Russian speaking area, should any patient ever be greeted first in Ukrainian? In Vancouver, Canada, an English speaking area, are patients first greeted in French? it is nationalism from Kiev gone mad, and it has started a war 3) Who, apart from a dictator, thinks he has the right to demand what percentage of books have to be in a particular language? True freedom is the right to choose which books in which language you sell. Thanks so much for highlighting the absurd nationalist and russophobic policies of Zelensky and the Azov Nazis. You have made it VERY clear why the Russian speakers feel liberated from Zelenky's tyranny. And you, you rabid lover of crushing human rights and freedom of speech, support him! Shame on you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hans895 1) Ukraine and Russia are so closely bound, it is only Ukraine if you wish to separate the two, but those of us who see it as one place would argue that Ukraine is not really a separate country, just like Catalonia is not really a separate country from Spain. 2) It doesn't matter whether it is "my place" or not. wherever there is injustice in this world, it is our place to point it out. It is unjust to admit Nazis into the national defense force. It is unjust to prohibit the Russian language in any way. It is unjust to oust a democratically elected president. It is unjust to ignore Russia's security concerns when it comes to the relentless expansion of NATO. Putin is NOT the criminal. 3) Look in the mirror to see the criminal. you will see, in the mirror, a person who today SUPPORTS language discrimination in Ukraine, who SUPPORTS Nazis in the armed forces, who SUPPORTS no opposition parties in parliament, who SUPPORTS Bandera as a national hero, who SUPPORTS banning all men from leaving the country. Look in the mirror. THERE you see the criminal. Not Putin. hans is the criminal
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hans895 Ah, so we have agreement! A declared national hero of Ukraine was a Fascist and anti Semite! Ukrainians name a university in Lvov after a Fascist and anti - Semite, the EU has a real problem with that, Jewish groups have a MASSIVE problem with that, oh. but virtuous Hans says "oh, that was all in the past"! Oh, you total hypocrite! Yes, Zelensky has indeed taken reality (that Fascist sentiment is massive in Ukraine) "into account" (shrugs it off as nothing) and like you, is absolutely fine with a policy of Ukrainian tax payers paying Azov Nazis to fight for Ukraine. My God, you are as fascist as they are by supporting them. Thank God we have Putin to call you stinking hypocrites out. If you had any common sense, you would back the ethnic Russians in their struggle against this Fascism, but you reveal your true colors when you try to brush it under the carpet. Pure hypocrisy. Got an Azov Nazi swastika tattoo yourself have you, Hans? despicable.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bonnie7898 at least we agree that ANYONE saying "NATO is a defensive alliance" is "simplifying its role" (lying), and that would include its own general secretary. No NATO member country was being defended when Libya and Serbia were attacked, so again, let's stop with the West's BS, and be honest. NATO is a military alliance that, whenever it so decides, will bomb the hell out of any country it deems bad, a threat, or just anti West. thanks for clarifying that and pointing out, again, how hypocritical the West is on such matters.
1
-
@bonnie7898 so you don't understand how Switzerland. could have a "harmonious society" if all 3 language groups there insist on education being allowed in the community's native language? you don't see how Ticino's Italian speakers can live in a 100% Italian speaking society, and the Francophones can live in a 100% French speaking society, and the German speakers can live in a 100% German speaking society, and yet all 3 groups live harmoniously in one country, Switzerland. you don't understand how that is possible? If you DID understand how it was possible, and it is the reality, then you would understand why the Russian speakers of Ukraine just want the same rights as, say, the French speaking Swiss. Too much to ask for? Ukraine supporters shout "YES, TOO MUCH TO ASK FOR, SHUT UP AND CONFORM TO UKRAINIANIZATION"..."No, language rights are very important" shout Putin's supporters. which one are you?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@derekd1510 6) "Russia has always practiced imperialist tyranny"
no more or less than Britain, France, Spain, Japan, China, USA, Germany the list is endless. Again, grow up, bleating "Russian oppression, but only Russian oppression, can't see any other power acting in the same way" is just silly.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@derekd1510 you are someone completely deluded by the biased media you follow and by erroneous preconceptions you have about what is happening in Ukraine. You are Russophobic and irrational, the kind of person who sees a missile land in Poland, and if it is fired by Russia you shout "genocide, indiscriminate, terrorism" yet if the missile is fired by Ukrainians you shout "accident, still Russia's fault". You are the very epitome of Orwell's "four legs good, two legs bad". You are blind to the hypocrisy and deceit pf the West and when challenged on simple issues and on simple questions, like language rights in Ukraine, you refuse to answer, because you have no answer. you are, in short, pathetic.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ccahill2322 looks like you have no idea what genocide is.
genocide is quite different from mass murder.
genocide includes the aim, the objective, of wiping out a whole ethnic/cultural/social group of people, i.e, as Hitler tried to exterminate the Jews.
If the aim of a local, serial murderer is to wipe out, remove from the planet, all children, then we can certainly say the murderer failed if substantial numbers of children remain after his attempts.
by the way, claiming there was "no crime" is obviously completely different from claiming "there was no genocide".
you need to get educated.
let's turn it around.
If Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, did USA commit genocide when bombing Japan to end WW2?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
MASSIVE MASSIVE WIN FOR PUTIN! All along, Putin has argued for the demining of Ukrainian ports..these agreements are the first steps to that end. Putin has insisted there was never any Russian blockade..he was proven right. All along Putin insisted on clear stipulation that Russian food products and fertilizers and those of Belarus be sanctions exempt, and HE NOW HAS THAT! Putin insisted it was Western sanctions causing the food export problem, the Global South agreed and pressured the West, and again, the West capitulated. On top of all that, the agreements confirm Russian oil can be exported to third countries without limits, so the West can now buy Russian oil from middlemen, like Saudi Arabia or India, no problem, The West can avoid its own sanctions. Beginning of the end, the West in full retreat, Putin on the way to complete victory.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Putin aim 2 ....demilitarize Ukraine. yes, a few more thousand Ukrainian troops have still to be killed, but thanks to Zelensky ordering his cannon fodder to fight for every inch, and an estimated kill ratio of 5:1 in favor of Russia, demilitarization is on track. Nearly everything Ukraine started the war with, weapon wise, has been destroyed, and as a bonus, most of what NATO has sent has been destroyed, hence the permanent begging for "more weapons" from Ukraine every day. Demilitarization of Ukraine AND NATO close at hand. Biden is now down to ORDERING manufacture of weapons, existing stocks close to zero.
1
-
1
-
@hape3862 keep in mind that most of the world is either on Russia's side, or tacitly supports Russia. Mexico, Central America, all of South America. all of Africa, Middle East, most of Asia including the giants, India, China, Pakistan, Turkey. all happy and willing to trade and work with Russia. Even in Europe, Hungary and Serbia are fine with Russia's stance. The deluded West has managed to turn the rest of the world against it. The Global South is racing ahead with dedolarization, ignoring G7 pressure to isolate Russia, ready and willing to buy Russian energy aplenty, even Saudi Arabia and OPEC happy to assist Russia by reducing production. Only the deluded, like yourself, see Russia as isolated. the opposite has happened. it will just take the slow learners, like you, a while to see it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Anvilman as expected, you have no bloody clue what your talking about and when put on the spot you are incapable of making any valid comparisons between Russian and NATO weapons systems.
Like SO many arrogant fools in the West, you assume Russia, for whatever reason, has been incapable of matching or superseding the West in its military production. You got it wrong. Like Biden, Johnson, Sunak, the whole lot of them, you terribly under-estimated Russia, and now that defeat is staring you in the face, you have no idea what to do.
Time to throw Zelensky under the bus, right?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@michaeldunham3385 The Baltic states are playing with fire.
Had they taken the Kazakhstan approach of embracing their ethnic Russians and allowing them equal rights, everything would be fine.
But in a manic nationalistic fervor to combat Russification from decades past, the Baltics are going down the same disastrous path as Ukraine nationalists chose, so we should expect the same results.
Putin will defend the rights of ethnic Russians wherever they are...Transnistria, Chechnya, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Crimea, Donbass, and next on the list it seems, Latvia.
There are some slow learners in the Baltics.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mrqrow2520 ok, so let me give you another analogy if, on the technicality of there being no official language in the USA, you don't get my point.
If, hypothetically speaking, Spain invaded Portugal, then Spanish would replace Portuguese as Portugal's official language.
So, what's your point? That an invading power gets to determine language policy over the land it conquers? so what?
Russia never occupied Latvia.
Latvia became a part of the USSR, one republic of which was the RFSFR, so, learn some basic history. Just embarrassing you can't distinguish between USSR and Russia.
Yes, we all know that Latvian was chosen as the one and only official language of Latvia. Hence, 25% of the Latvian population were alienated by the Riga government at the stroke of a nationalist pen.
Tell me, what would be the disaster that would befall Latvia if Russian were recognized, again, as an official language?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@thorstenvogt6561 1. Having to use the officially declared "national language" in official proceedings, even when every single person involved in the official proceedings speaks a language other than the "national language", is NOT an entirely common thing.
A court case in Daugavpils, in which judge, jury, and all assembled are Russian speakers, but every word of the proceedings must happen in what is a foreign language for them, is totally absurd.
You try telling French Canadians to have every word of a court proceeding in Montreal in English and see how long it takes for a revolution to break out.
2. Russian is an official language of Kazakhstan and is used on an equal basis with Kazakh. Russia has never made any claim that Kazakhstan is not a real country, so bang goes your theory on that one. You speak utter nonsense. On the contrary, where Russian is recognized as a lingua franca, in places like Uzbekistan, the relations between Uzbeks and Russians is very good. It's only the rabid nationalistic Russophobes of ex Soviet republics in Europe that are getting themselves in a mess because of their hatred of things Russian.
3. How can the Baltics possibly "avoid" having a Russian speaking minority? Sounds like you are advocating genocide. Legislating against use of language only antagonizes the minority speakers. Latvia seems determined to go the same way as Ukraine. If it had any sense, it would go the way of Kazakhstan.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@thorstenvogt6561 "Threat of violence by their previous Russian overlords / colonizers, as Ukraine is suffering, should not be a factor in that decision."
Yet, you just said that it's a really good idea for Switzerland to retain Italian as an official language, because Italy is not, at the moment, an aggressive, expansionist country.
So, in the case of Switzerland, the low threat level of the neighboring state is the reason why Italian should be an official language, but in the case of Kazakhstan, the threat level should play absolutely no part in decisions on the country's official languages?
and this all makes perfect sense to you?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TootsyBootsy from wikipedia
On 20 March 2022, President Volodymyr Zelensky announced a ban on 11 political parties for ties with Russia: Opposition Platform — For Life, Party of Shariy, Nashi, Opposition Bloc, Left Opposition, Union of Leftists, Derzhava, Progressive Socialist Party of Ukraine, Socialist Party of Ukraine, Socialists Party
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mirandahotspring4019 no one knows Russia's death toll. However, both General Milley and Ursula Van der Leyen are on record as saying Ukraine has 100,000 dead. The Institute for the Study of War is Victoria Nuland's propaganda group and their "statistics" are fabrications. The Ukrainians admit that 6:1 is the ratio of artillery shells fired in Russia's favor. The BBC, much to their disappointment, tried to ascertain Russian dead by counting soldiers' graves and got a really low number. The only people who mention a 3 day Special Military operation are ignorant fools who swallow hook line and sinker Western propaganda. No one in the Kremlin ever mentions a timeplan, as Russia doesn't follow one. As in Chechnya and Syria, this will take years, but it will be completed and all 5 objectives will be attained. Now then, dream on, honey, because the truth is not going to be nice for you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@HermesTTT ah, so now you change your stance! interesting. you have switched from "self-defence" to "safeguard the life of an other". do you always have to keep moving the goalposts in your arguments?
You are lost on this one.
When, in the flash of an eye, a police officer has to decide whether to pull the trigger or not, that police officer is indeed taking on the role of judge, jury and executioner, because an instant verdict has to be reached in the officer's mind, and in place of a judge, jury and executioner on the spot of the attempted arrest, the police officer performs the role of precisely the judge, jury and executioner.
now, let me guess, time for you to move some goalposts again!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@swirvinbirds1971 If GDP counted for something, the USA's chaotic, humiliating, disaster of a panicked exit from Afghanistan wouldn't have happened when a bunch of goat herders called Taliban strolled into town! Absolutely laughable you think GDP has a connection to military prowess! Russia exports the commodities the world needs, hence sanctions don't work with Russia, and the Russian military is well supplied. USA doesn't even have tried and tested hypersonic weapons! WAY behind the curve. Soviet era equipment, i.e. old tanks, is fine for the purposes of occupying territory. Russia is winning and NATO is running out of weapons...the inept Russians have beaten the even more inept West. No one is hiding behind any name. I'm a British citizen, Duncan Smith is my name, quite happy to prove that to you if you really desire to be proven wrong and eat humble pie. Swirvin Birds, on the other hand, hints at a total coward embarrassed to go by a real name. A coward who would be ideal to fight for NATO, I would guess.
1
-
1
-
@Blanka1100 No, Putin is not my idea of a democratic leader. I would put Putin on a par with Zelensky as far as his "democratic" credentials go. I don't particularly trust Putin, no, but then again, I don't trust anyone. However, in the case of intervening in Ukraine to protect the rights of the Russian speakers there, I believe Putin has calculated correctly and is in the right...and instead of blindly following the Western narrative of "Russia bad, Ukraine good", you should consider, just maybe, that Russia was provoked and that the West is wrong to back Zelensky, given that Zelensky refused to implement the Minsk Accords.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mark Mierzejewski no, i never mentioned that this war as the same as anything! read my words again.
What I expected was that, after 20 years, the US would have eliminated the enemy. They failed to do that. Or, alternatively, admit after one year that they were incapable of eliminating the enemy and left.
yep, let it sink in!
a bunch or mercs and convicts just defeated Ukraine's finest, NATO trained, NATO armed, NATO financed! Mercs and Convicts 1, Ukraine and NATO 0! Let that sink in!
You deluded, brainwashed Western dopes have no clue about Russia and how Russia operates. but you are learning, slowly.
see you in Bakhmut!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bonnie7898 There was no genocide attempted in Donbass. Indiscriminate shelling of civilians doesn't clear the bar of genocide. It's still enough for Russia to intervene, but not genocide.
Now, as to Serbia, let's see if you can produce evidence of a "systematic attempt to eradicate". systematic would mean a modus operandi, a pattern of behavior that was ordered from above. any government decree from Belgrade mentioning "genocide"? how about the names of a few villages where this happened?
If I gave you the names of a few villages where the Kosovars did the same to Serb families, would you be convinced that Kosovo was committing genocide against the Kosovo Serbs?
But, for the sake of argument, let us assume you are right, that Serbia had committed genocide. Then your argument becomes this: that whenever a military power is convinced genocide is happening, said military power has the right to invade, bomb, kill, murder, occupy, destroy wherever it wants, in the name of ending the genocide. sovereignty, territorial integrity, targeting infrastructure, collateral damage, all is acceptable. it all comes down to the definition and interpretation of "genocide".
in that case, please, never ever again criticize Russia for invading sovereign territory, nor for waging war in such places. Just restrict your criticism to Russia's wayward interpretation of "genocide", because everything else is acceptable in your playbook.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@anthonychin1873 if the sanctions intended to cause massive inflation and an energy crisis in the West, plus rising profits for Russia's energy exports, then I guess they are working just fine! The ruble is strong because most of the world is happy to trade with Russia, and European gas companies have to pay in rubles, ha ha. Your nonsense about "oh, the ruble will collapse when the Russians can no longer manipulate the market" is pathetic whining and whistling in the wind. To any neutral observer one can see the sanctions have failed, the West is in panic over recession and a miserable winter, Russia is doing just fine, and it's German pensioners that will freeze to death on Christmas Day, not Russians. Have a very, merry Christmas and New Year, lol.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@anthonychin1873 grasping at straws is when Habeck goes begging Qatar, Nigeria, USA and Canada for LNG contracts and comes back empty handed! you are right, inflation is not new. recession is not new. a cold winter is not new. But what is new is a cold winter that is accompanied by rampant inflation and recession due to the West's sanctions on a country that it is trying to cripple! This is unique! Ask yourself, when the sanctions were introduced, who among the Western leaders told us that a result of the sanctions would be a strong ruble, and weakened euro, that Russia's war effort would continue unabated, that Russia would not be isolated but keep trading with three quarters of the world profitably, and that inflation and recession would hit the West? Who announced all that in March? uhhh, no one, because they were too damn dumb to realize Russia is strong enough to survive sanctions, and the West is not strong enough to survive with no Russian energy. The sanctions are a miserable failure for the West. only a fool would be blind to that reality.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@richardploss4494 just remember. EVERY attack by Russia that you describe as "terrorism" is just Russia copying what USA and NATO have done in Iraq, in Afghanistan, in Syria, in Serbia, in Libya, and so on. Russia is just following, exactly, the "rules based order" of the West. You should be overjoyed! Unless, that is, you are a terrible hypocrite!? Please explain, what is Russia doing that the West never did?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@annaredding disposable income is something you can't just "increase". that is like waving a magic wand and making people richer.
"large scale redistribution" is just Robin Hood, steal from the rich and give to the poor, Socialist countries like Cuba and Venezuela and USSR tried that, it doesn't work. you kill the goose that lays the golden egg.
there is no remedy to our present situation, because the damage is done. you can't pay the whole nation to stay at home and not work, and then avoid rampant inflation and debt and poverty. too late. the only thing government can do to help is slash spending. unlimited aid to Ukraine is a drain, housing illegal immigrants in hotels is a drain, sanctions on Russia is a drain, increased defense spending is a drain, the NHS is a massive drain, subsidizing green energy is a drain. if you don't want to slash government spending, then accept living with things as they are. taxing the rich will drive the rich away and actually reduce government revenues. you want the rich to stay and continue to invest in the country, not to walk away from the country.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bonnie7898 1. the invasion of Ukraine is fully justified due to Ukraine's refusal to implement the Minsk Agreements. The Donbass had declared independence and that separation from Kiev needed to be enforced. just like YOU support military intervention when the USA and NATO do it, some of us support it when Russia does it.
2. leaving Ukraine to sort it out = letting Ukraine compel the Russian speakers to be second class citizens in their own country. ain't gonna happen. thankfully, Putin defends the rights of ethnic Russians everywhere.
3.Putin is right. Ukraine isn't a real state. the very name of the country tells you that. it is the "kray", the borderland of Russia. Was the Crimean War fought against Ukraine, or against Russia?
4. Yes, am absolutely certain Putin has no intention to absorb Ukraine into Russia. why would he? He never annexed Moldova, just liberated the Russian speakers there and allowed them to form Transnistria. He never annexed Georgia, just liberated Abkhazia and South Ossetia from Tbilisi's control. All the evidence shows that Putin wants freedom for oppressed Russian speakers, nothing more, nothing less.
5. Putin insists that Ukraine remain neutral. Putin knows that NATO is not defensive, as evidenced by NATO troops attacking Libya, Serbia, occupying Afghanistan. Just as no US president would accept Mexico or Cuba to become part of an anti US military alliance, so Putin is insisting that Ukraine remain neutral. and he is right to so insist. only deluded Western fools think war with Russia is a really good idea just so that Ukraine can be part of NATO.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@matthewsill748 Russia is not claiming any land just because some people there speak Russian!
There are Russian speakers in Estonia, in Latvia, in Lithuania, in Belarus, in Kazakstan, in Uzbekistan, in Kirghizia, in Tadjikistan, and Putin has never shown any desire to invade such places.
However, in places where Russian speakers and ethnic Russians are not afforded equal rights, Putin will intervene and restore those rights, as he did in Georgia (Abkhazia and South Ossetia) and in Transnistria.
It's about human rights and equality.
Discriminate against Russians and Putin will deal with you.
Suggestion: respect the rights of your ethnic Russian population, don't f**k about with their language rights, allow them to celebrate their Russian culture to the full, and there will be no problems.
If only Zelenski had been wise and done the right thing and respected his ethnic Russians, right?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@maryanchabursky9148 1. The legitimacy is in the referenda, again, a notion of democracy that escapes you. Donetsk and Lugansk voted to separate from Kiev. Accept reality.
2. You avoid the inconvenient truth of the Crimean Parliament voting for separation from Kiev. Educate yourself. Google "Guardian Crimean Parliament Simferopol vote", read the article, and then tell me why you are sure it is all lies.
3. True of false? In the Ukrainian constitution an impeached president has the right to hearings, and to due legal process, his day in court, yes or no? When exactly were the hearings on Yanukovich's crimes?
4. The same polls you refer to were taken BEFORE the anti-constitutional coup. Before 2014, there was hardly any desire for separation. After the coup, the desire to separate from the nazi regime in Kiev sky-rocketed, obviously.
no doubt you loved every minute of the round of applause given to one of your Banderite heroes, Waffen SS monster in the Canadian parliament, right?
you have so much to learn.
1
-
1
-
@maryanchabursky9148 I blame Nazi Germany for all the war crimes that Nazi Germany committed against Ukrainian Jews, and I blame Ukrainian Nazis for joining Nazi Germany in its effort to eliminate the Jews.
What is astounding is that you can't, or won't, do the same!
Ukrainian national hero, Stefan Bandera, led a pogrom in Lvov in 1941 that killed 4,000 Jews. The 98 year old Ukrainian Nazi recently applauded by you and Zelensky, the Waffen SS monster who swore allegiance to Adolf Hitler, is a person YOU SUPPORT!
and the very fact you support such people explains why so many Russian speakers want no part of the nazi russophobic hellhole that Kiev has become.
All your other arguments have been dealt with and answered.
Did you look up the Wikipedia article on Language Policy in Ukraine to see how the EU absolutely lambasted Ukraine for its discriminatory behavior towards Russian speakers?
you and your fellow Ukrainian nazis are an absolute disgrace, and after the horrendous display of nazi worship seen in Ottawa, no wonder most of the world backs Russia.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@VVayVVard not for the first time in your life, you are making wrong assumptions! par for the course.
yes, I joined in 2022, my full name is Ian Duncan Smith, I am a UK citizen currently in Portugal, no idea what an avatar is, but fascinating you deduce so much, incorrectly.
Back to the issues in hand.
This debate was all about the effectiveness of sanctions.
on a country like Russia, sanctions don't work, and, on the contrary, they lead to a boost in the economy of the sanctioned country, a decline in the economies of those imposing sanctions, and the sanctions are easily circumvented....Russian oil pouring into the EU all the evidence you need.
Happy reading ITAR or whatever gets you going.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@wearebecomedeathstar2658 "went", not "whent" Einstein.
The reasoning is flawed, exactly as I pointed it out.
I'll point it out again.
Gear shifts change the values of an equation. Gear shifts don't change any "rules" at all.
As I said, a change of rules, as regards gear shifts, would imply a whole new way the gear shift system works, or functions, not just changing from one gear to another within the established system.
So, yes, gear shifts change the values in a given equation, but they certainly don't change any rules of the universe.
I am not arguing about the nature of mathematics and physics. certain rules apply to both disciplines.
what I am saying is that to equate gear shifts with a rule, as it applies to NATO, is dumb and misplaced.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@olivesama If you want to base what the world feels based on opinion polls, you will find the vast majority of the planet either has no idea what is happening in Ukraine or Russia, don't know where those places are, or more likely, don't care.
So for Western leaders to try to convince most global leaders to isolate Russia is a waste of time, because global leaders know that what Russia does holds no great interest for their people. Opinion polls of the world population would be 90% "don't care".
But how the world trades with Russia DOES tell you what global leaders think, and on behalf of their massive populations, global leaders of the most populous countries have decided to stick with Russia.
As a Nigerian, you will know that Africa cares about Russian exports of grain, seeds, energy, and cares very little about who rules the Donbass.
Wisely, Nigeria is going to pay attention to what OPEC and BRICS says and does, and pay little attention to what Macron says. Hence the moves recently to expel France and USA from the Sahel, and the embrace of Russian and Chinese influence.
Before you prattle on about your nationality and what lectures you do or don't need, keep your mind open as to what my nationality might be.
Though something tells me only your nationality and identity are of any importance to you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
your turn. enlighten me. here are the really big countries in the world. now you tell me what the citizens in these countries think about the Ukraine conflict, how much they care about it, and what their leaders should do about Russia:
China, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nigeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Brazil, Mexico.
are these countries protesting and demanding their leaders declare sanctions on Russia and isolate Russia? You see mass demonstrations in Lagos every day crying out for Nigerian aid to be sent to Kiev in vast quantities?
1
-
@olivesama doesn't matter if there is any difference between "trading with" and "approving of".
in the real world, actions speak louder than words, and everyone is still trading with Russia and working with Russia.
Quite why you think there is mass global disapproval of Russia is mind-blowing. There isn't.
The Global majority is sick and tired of lecturing, Western colonialists demanding this and that be done against Russia. The ordinary people simply don't care, they want Russia to continue exporting its much needed commodities. period.
grasp reality and get your head out of the bla bla bla of UN debates and conferences. The reality on the ground is that Russia has plenty of friends, and the close ones, like China, India, Iran, N Korea, Venezuela and OPEC are determined to see Russia keep functioning as normal. wake up.
1
-
@olivesama that seems to imply you think Africans associate Russia with "imperialism carried out by white countries", when the reality is the countries now fighting Russia are the colonial powers (Britain, France, Germany, Belgium) that would be the targets of African disdain.
When the leaders of Russia's enemies visit Africa, they are hosted very coldly these days. Macron is spurned by the leaders of ex French West Africa. In contrast, Sergey Lavrov is greeted with hugs and smiles.
African leaders know that Russia never sent a colonial force to Africa. African leaders know that Western European powers did. Mainstream African thought, and yes, you certainly seem to need a lecture on this, is more in favor of Russia than it is of the West.
And that is a big reason why Russia is not disapproved of, by and large, in Africa.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@MrKakibuy yep, every opportunity. it's a phrase meaning looking forward, there are potential opportunities. Given himars has failed in recent weeks, given Europe no longer supplying arms and ammo, given Ukrainian soldiers are dying faster than being replaced, Russia will soon have the opportunity to connect Kherson with Transnistra to make Ukraine landlocked. No need or desire, for now, to take Odessa, nor Kharkov. Pinning down Ukrainian troops there is all that is needed, the usual fixing the opposition and setting up a cauldron. worked a treat in Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Chechnya, Syria, and will work a treat in Ukraine. patience.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bonnie7898 bla bla bla.
just a list of excuses for Western failure. you have no clue.
The West, as it always does, assumed air superiority and superior weapons would win the day, and it didn't. the Taliban hid, the Taliban still plotted terror, the Taliban still had loyal followers, the Taliban bided its time and then took over.
Total Western failure.
Not sure if the height of Western failure was the intelligence that "Taliban would need 90 days to take Kabul", or the droning of an innocent Afghan family to death just before US flew out of Kabul. which one, for you, was the crowning achievement of the West's presence in Afghanistan?
If you want to defeat an enemy, commit all your forces to do so.
If you don't want to defeat an enemy, get the hell out and stop farting around for 20 years. it's that simple, as the west is learning again in Syria and now Ukraine.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@oisin3495 Aim 1 - recognition of Crimea as part of Russia, will be so when Ukraine surrenders, Aim 2 - Ukraine a neutral country written into its constitution, which Ukraine came close to accepting in Istanbul when it was obvious NATO never really wanted Ukraine as a member. Aim 3 - liberation of LPR and DPR. Luhansk, job done. Donetsk. in progress but Ukraine has shown it is unable to halt Russia's incremental advances there, and now the Chechens are back in action, we can expect Bakhmut to fall soon. Aim 4. Denazification of Ukraine, done, the Azov Nazis got killed crippled or captured in Mariupol, job done Aim 5 - demilitarization of Ukraine, Ukraine now down to teenage cannon fodder which is being thrown into the Russian meatgrinder and chewed up in their thousands every day. Unreported by the West, but the horrendous losses of men and equipment spells the end for Ukraine. As a bonus, Russia has demilitarized NATO! USA now down to PROCUREMENTS! (ordering the manufacture of weapons and ammo!), reached the bottom of the barrel! Putin may well declare war to get the 5 aims wrapped up before winter, but he may just wait patiently and smile as Europe shivers and freezes all winter. i think i would wait it out and watch the fun. and you?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@thegreatdane3627 not for the first time, you are wrong.
Europe has continued to fund the enemy by buying enormous amounts of Russian energy all through this conflict. How do you think your gas storage got full? Moreover, your dumb leaders were forced to pay in rubles, so the ruble strengthened, and the euro sank. Russian revenues from energy have increased, as European actions raised the price of energy worldwide. A total failure for Europe.
Of course, the energy companies will be fine, but the poor and needy will get totally screwed. you'll see, but nice enough to know you can afford 19 degrees forever more. at least you will be fine, don't worry about those in a worse position:)
"fuel poverty" was an unknown phrase in the UK until this year. Now everyone knows it, and many are suffering from it. the policies you support are absolutely crushing the poor in Europe. Happy?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Fractal369 Spain has always been mostly desert. It has changed very little over the decades.
The evidence is against you.
In general, higher levels of COs have started to green the planet. Satellite imagery shows vast areas of Western Australia and the Sahel are greening, and that is wonderful news.
Despite the fact that the planet's population has sky rocketed, weather-related famines have all but disappeared, and there has never been less poverty in the world and more food production, all of this happening as the planet warms.
if you can name me one country suffering from greater malnutrition now than before the industrial revolution, go ahead.
The real climate expert on this is William Happer, and like him, I think it important we keep adding some more CO2 to the atmosphere, as on balance, it benefits the planet.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@verdebusterAP ok, now the truth, in Boxing analogies.
Russia has gone into this fight with NATO/Ukraine with flexibility and caution. NATO/Ukraine was distracted in round one with some big Russian punches that took away 20% of NATO/Ukraine's energy, and NATO/Ukraine was just relieved to get through the round, battered and bruised. From round two on Russia kept gradually wearing NATO/Ukraine down while minimizing expending energy, knowing that such tactics worked well in the last bout against Syria. Here in Round 8, despite a lot of shouting from NATO/Ukraine that a massive counter attack would happen, it hasn't. How Russia will decide to win the last 4 rounds is still up for debate, but it doesn't rely on some magic energy bar supplied by the corner, it has all the tools at its disposal to win. it is just a matter of when the NATO/Ukraine corner throws the towel in. In the previous round NATO/Ukraine threw all punches they could muster and landed one, that grazed the temple. Exhausted NATO/Ukraine now just begging for a miracle to survive the next 4 rounds....but even then the judges' decision will go against them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jjoejones1 I provided you with logic. There's a paucity of facts available to the public in war. Neither you nor I have any idea of the death count on either side. What you and I do have are Ukrainian pronouncements on the their death counts, off and on, throughout this conflict. The Ukrainian claims of death counts can be as high as a thousand a week (when they are desperate for more handouts from the West), and as "low" as about a hundred a week, when they want to convince the world things are going well. Lately, there has been a notable silence from Ukraine on its death counts from its counter offensives. Logic dictates that means its high. Washington Post and New York Times, both rabid supporters of the Ukraine cause, have printed articles on the startlingly high Ukrainian death count. On the other hand, talking of paucity, you have offered NOTHING at all to refute my logic. But, go ahead, where is my analysis wrong? am in no hurry
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Simon Paterson Given the Ukraine has failed to mount a counter offensive in the last 8 years of this conflict, I would say that even with all NATO's help, that Ukraine has been subdued.
But to answer your question, given the absolutely pathetic performance of NATO to evacuate Kabul last year when a bunch of sandal wearing goat herders called the Taliban strolled into town, I would say toothless and gutless USA, with its babbling demented incoherent commander in chief, would last but a few weeks.
The American masses, obese, blubbery, woke, would be totally unable to stomach the photos of hundreds and hundreds of young men shipped home in bodybags, and just as the Vietnam protests ended in defeat for USA, then protests against huge American losses would lead to peace with Russia and yet another US defeat.
Given the US is now recruiting ANYONE willing to join, such is their desperation to attract people to the military, safe to say Russia would crush USA.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@brianconnelly7823 only in your dreams. Tell me, which EU sanctions package succeeded in destroying the Russian economy? number 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 0r 12? :)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@antonitaylor2229 my objection was to anyone who thinks they should be GIVEN anything, so my words were directed to whomever used the word "given".
I can understand you didn't "want" to turn to social housing, and I can understand you didn't "want" to turn to foster care for your sister, but sometimes in life we have to settle for things we don't want to do.
The planners didn't screw you over.
You were just naive and ignorant of the system and how it works, or doesn't work.
Hopefully, now, you have learned that UK has no interest in allowing new buildings be put up. The UK has rules and regulations about everything from Green policies to banking restrictions. It's a bureaucratic nightmare. Had you been resident in a go-ahead free market place like Paraguay, you would have been fine, but not the UK.
With a million immigrants a year entering the country, no way you are going to get any special treatment. The agenda is to get a roof over the immigrants' heads, not transfer you anywhere while you were offered social housing and foster care.
at the end of the day, you made life decisions that were really bad for your plans to still live in the UK. No one compelled you to be in charge of 5 kids, so you can look back on those decisions and reflect.
it would be good to know why your request was denied, or why it took so long, but in the UK, such things are normal, not abnormal.
best of luck to you, but there was nothing in your story that was unusual for UK in 2024, totally expected, and you can expect things to get a lot lot worse. Every immigrant housed in the UK will put you down lower on the list of priorities regarding building, planning, and accommodating.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Jonah Whale right, so it is not Brexit itself that is harming exports to the EU, but the size of business that is the problem. If only the small businesses could band together, somehow, to achieve those record sales to the EU that the big boys are securing!
well, the article mentioned that the idea of forming a bigger conglomerate to handle such paperwork is indeed happening! so a solution is on the horizon! teething problems.
remember, it is the protectionist corrupt cartel called the EU that insists on all this bureaucratic nonsense. Brexiteers are by and large free traders and anti red tape. Ditch it all, I say, let businesses and consumers decide market values.
Now then, while weighing up the drop from 15 bn to 8 bn (there you go again, just looking at the money value and not the number of transactions) also tell me the numbers for trade from non EU countries. fair and balanced now.
1
-
@Jonah Whale I know a lot about business. More importantly, I can see that reading comprehension is not your forte, nor indeed understanding in general.
without looking at the books and talking to the directors, I wouldn't dare, unlike you, to point the finger of blame on just one cause. But, for the sake of argument, let us assume you are 100% right and that Brexit is 100% the sole cause of such a downturn in fortunes. does that mean that, in the big picture, Brexit is a bad thing?
just baffling how you, and the Guardian, will concede that UK trade with the EU is ever growing, yet say Brexit is such a terrible thing.
at least entertain the idea that some small businesses have suffered, others have not, and yet others have flourished. And when the big picture has been contemplated, look at the corrupt, protectionist cartel that is the cause of your misfortune and try to apportion some blame to the warped Brussels view of doing business, rather than the free market Brexiteers. then you might grasp reality.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jeremytine and you were trying to show that GDP is some kind of reliable metric to show that Western banking is in better shape than Russian banking, but GDP is related to a nation's output, not a company's profitability, so you got it all wrong to start with.
No Russian banks have failed recently, as opposed to those like Credit Suisse in the West. But if you do want to talk about nations and GDP, my point that GDP does NOT measure the true state of a nation's economy is true. the true measure is whether a nation exports what the world needs, and Russia is in such a strong position because it exports what the world needs, oil, gas, coal, wheat, fertilizers, uranium, precious metals. so when Russia barks, the world listens. when Italy barks, no one hives a s**t. ditch the GDP argument, it's worthless.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@CountScarlioni falls in energy prices don't do a lot of harm to Russia. it's a very simple game. if prices fall, more energy is produced and sold and revenue is stabilized. it doesn't have a massive effect.
Beg to differ on the "success story"!, TEN packets of sanctions announced, 1 year into this, the ruble is strong (not "rubble" as predicted by Biden) and modest growth forecast (as opposed to recession for the UK). Compared to the predictions of the West on how Russia, it's economy and banking system, would be crippled, THIS IS SUCCESS!
You may need to explain how the sanctions are a ligature to Biden and the EU. They certainly didn't expect to see Russian rate of inflation coming down, denial of SWIFT having no great effect, and energy revenues increasing. I mean, if they did, they didn't announce to the Western public "hey folks, in one year, expect the sanctions to have produced really no significant effect, except on us"
Nah, wishful thinking on your part. Word on the street is that all those chips and components are produced to high enough quality at home, or imported from friendly nations like UAE. Got a feeling the mass buying up of washing machines is bs, but hey, if it's true, seems to be working for Russia!
The West completely misjudged this. If they are going for the ligature effect, it's a big gamble. Russia may have won before the ligature has crippled Russia and the West's pissed off citizenry will be furious with the dopey leaders we have.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@taylorlatch2635 when talking about economic might, GDP is a useless measurement. That's why people can't understand why Russia has survived the sanctions so robustly, whereas somewhere like Italy would have collapsed in a week, though both Russia and Italy have comparable GDPs.
Things like government spending are reflected in GDP, so, print more money, spend it all, and watch your GDP go up, but it doesn't reflect a robust economy.
you have to look at debt levels, and most critically, commodity exports.
Russia exports what all the world needs: energy, precious metals, grains, food.
Russia will always have markets available and guaranteed income.
Italy sells Armani bags and holidays for pensioners.
Africa doesn't need what Italy produces.
Africa needs what Russia produces.
Sanctions on Russia won't work.
They would work most effectively on any European country.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@serebii666 no, i asked you to explain the precedented maintenance. what was the normal maintenance schedule?
you trumpeted yourself as the one that knows all this stuff, so presumably, before you wrote "unprecedented maintenance" you knew exactly what the Nordstream precedented maintenance was.
Suddenly, you seem quite ignorant! Suddenly your argument is the academically vacuous "Russia is to blame, Russia is to blame". interesting.
Now, the compressors that were sent to Siemens in Canada, was there anything in the existing contracts that the Canadians broke there, yes or no?
Believe me, "expert", your grilling has only just begun, because you absolutely stink of being a propagandist and not an expert, but go ahead, keep educating me. answer the questions, please, oh expert on contracts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kralikkral5560 and now the truth.
only a small number of people in the Kremlin know the total of Russian losses, so put your crystal ball down and stop dreaming up numbers.
if you think Ukraine has lost only 75,000, then either you or General Milley is lying. Milley said months ago that Ukrainian dead numbered more than 100,000...so which of you is lying?
oh yes, always "in a few weeks"....more ammo, not now, in a few weeks. more tanks, not now, in a few weeks. more trained staff, not now, in a few weeks. yep, we get the picture. nothing we can do now, but always the help will come "in a few weeks".
my God, if this is NATO at its best, no wonder the Taliban defeated NATO in Kabul on 2021.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jacqdanieles do you want me to send evidence of the airbnb i stayed when there? what more do you need, just let me know. actually, it's NOT where I thought it was...it is much closer to the bus station than I imagined. still. Officer's House/Club it is, it was hosting a meeting. Russian intel got their target. as always, collateral damage, but hey, USA/NATO know all about that from operations in Serbia, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan and many other places, right?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@marcwareham9351 I always make fun of those who brag about their "specialist subject" and how successful they are in business! as a vain peacock, you were just too tempting a target. Curious you refused to answer the question about why you have such faith in the accuracy of the 47% number!
If I were going to war, unlike you, I would pay ZERO attention to the GDP number. I would be curious to know the GDP to debt ratio, and the exports of the enemy (it seems you would be happy to go to war based on just GDP, fool).
now, in a war situation, "ceteris paribus" is a fantasy, because THERE ARE ALWAYS MANY OTHER FACTORS IN PLAY. as a "specialist in economics" you will understand that "ceteris paribus" is useful in theory, but when all things are NOT equal and cannot be equal, it is pointless plugging that into any real life equation!
need any more lectures on economics, Mr Specialist?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@seantoner7392 as expected, you failed to quote the law that was broken, because there is no such law. An "article" of the UN has no legal force anywhere in the world. Try again.
But just to have a little fun with you, was the US invasion of Iraq also illegal?
And curious that you answer the question "what are the borders of Palestine?" by stating how much land you would have given Palestine! That's like being asked "what are the borders of Finland?" and answering, "I would give 70% of Finland to the Finns". Try again. where exactly is Palestine? Maybe start your answer by explaining the borders of the Palestinian Mandate as awarded by the League of Nations to Britain, 80% of which is now occupied by Jordan (10% MORE than you think the Palestinian Arabs deserve, so Israel is dues a whole chunk of Jordan back, by your calculations).
I would define the borders of Israel as those in place the day Israel was admitted into the UN, but would also fully back Israel's claim to any land conquered by Israel in subsequent wars. Obviously, Israel is not the whole of the Palestinian Mandate, as that would include all of Jordan, and the idea was to create a Jewish homeland and one for the Palestinian Arabs.
Interesting you say that if Sinai is included as part of Israel, then '56 was perfectly legal. In that case, let's include Sinai. In war, winner takes all.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@T5Zplayer as I said, if you are incapable of answering my very basic questions of you, STFU, you dope.
Georgia - Abkazia and South Ossetia liberated from repressive Russophobic legislation, both areas now at peace and delighted to be free of Tbilisi.
Chechnya - jihadists who tried to install an Islamic autocracy and, again, deny basic rights to ethnic Russians, defeated.
Murdering civilians in Syria? more or less than USA have murdered in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Serbia, Vietnam, Panama, etc etc?
and what is your country exactly? let's get to the truth here.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@chriIIe The evidence is against you.
Whatever the academic field you choose, Chinese score higher than whites who score higher than Africans. Period. It is the reverse order for athletic ability.
Europeans do know they are, as a group, better in terms of technical ability than Africans because, as a group, they are.
Europeans believe jobs should go to Europeans in Europe because they are the indigenous people, just as Nigerians believe jobs should go to Nigerians in Nigeria over non indigenous folk. It's not a complicated thing to figure out.
I have never heard any individual argue "they can work harder" because they have no basis of comparison. As a group, we can certainly say that Asians work harder than any other group, so, no surprise Asians score best in academics and are the biggest earners.
Certainly "I'm one of you, so you should help me first" is a common sentiment the world over. We are still more tribal than we realize, but that tribal affiliation is not unique to whites or Europeans at all.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@johnnyjohnson2268 it's about 4.5 kms on a footpath, there is no road. the hike is described as tough, but it's not if you are just going one way down to the cove.
it's because there is no road access, no cameras, no buildings, that smuggling of all types happens there.
some reports of a Belgian registered boat, the Maruba?, was off the coast there, lingering, going nowhere.
maybe Jay refused to courier drugs for the Luton lads and walked out, or maybe agreed, got the backpack on and found the trail down. where his phone pinged is further along the road than the trail, but he may have got there and double backed realizing he's gone too far.
dunno. just seems bizarre coincidence that the Luton lads chose a remote location like Masca, spent most of their time indoors, drove down to the festival in the evenings and, i believe, have stayed in that same villa before.
it all fits together somehow!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@erglis1145 yes, Switzerland is a different subject that you refuse to discuss, because it reveals your hypocrisy. so, let's try again. Italian speakers represent only 4% of the Swiss population, but their language is recognized as an official language and they have no need to take a language exam to retain Swiss citizenship. so, you tell me, which country has got this right? Switzerland, or Latvia? Or, let me guess, you are so Russophobic that ONLY when we talk about native Russian speakers does your bigotry get exposed?
and as to French people in the UK not bothering anyone, what has the Russian speaking lady in Latvia done that bothers anyone?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mikeglenn5212 again, Mike, you need to stop just swallowing all the fake news thrown your way.
tell me why you think the West has ANY idea what Russian losses are? what's the source of these estimates?
Ukraine admits it is being outgunned at least 6 to 1 on the artillery front, Ukraine admits that 75% of its casualties are from artillery, but somehow your math calculates that Russia is losing loads more lives? Really ?
Keep in mind a lot of the front line heavy lifting is being done by the convicts, mercenaries, Chechens, DPR and LPR. No one cares much about the death toll of the first 3 of these groups.
One year of attritional warfare is nothing for Russia. Again, study Chechnya, Syria and see the results. Give it a few more years and, as in Chechnya and Syria, Russia will have eliminated its enemies....not like the 20 years of occupying Afghanistan just to see the Taliban emerge victorious, eh?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@i_kissed_a_pixie1537 keep in mind, locating a human is quite different from reaching or retrieving a human body. people keep on how the terrain hinders a search. it doesn't.
given that dogs can smell where a human is located, from above the ravine, and given that drones can access almost anywhere these days, locating the body is not the horrendous challenge it once was.
in fact, you couldn't disappear if you tried these days.
the dogs will locate, and the humans will retrieve.
that's IF procedures are followed correctly, which, in this case, they weren't, they were ignored. the question is, why?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@syryder3236 I don't recall Lucy saying she had a missed call from Jay. are you sure about that?
anyway, help me with the timeline.
Lucy says she drove over there and went looking for Jay, but she also set up the GoFundMe and reported Jay missing to the Police, so, she was busy!
IF Lucy went straight over to the Masca area, and IF Jay was still on or just off that road, she would have seen him and found him.
However, if the gangsters got the airbnb location from Lucy, or by any other means, then they would have seen and found Jay on the road or just off the road.
Chances are someone found Jay and I refuse to believe that Jay just ended up stumbling through wilderness and dying in such a well concealed spot that no one, no dog, no drone, no helicopter can find him.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@michaelsterckx4120 and that may well be true for every purchase in the capitalist system, but the truth remains, as a patient, I have experienced both the NHS and the US system, in both systems I personally paid nothing, but received MUCH better and more timely attention with the US system.
So, from my perspective, the NHS is a failure, and given the amount that each man and woman pays for the NHS, on average, it looks like applying for a private plan would be much more sensitive.
As I say, when the NHS has enough funds to employ diversity and equity officers, you know the system isn't working.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@scurra1163 cheerleading the Azov nazis is as low as it gets, no lectures needed from someone cheering on the Azov Nazi battalion. Big fan of Bandera yourself are you?
Ukraine is receiving totally insufficient aid, you dope, hence it does nothing but beg, beg, beg. winners don't beg. Zhaluzny says he needs 300 tanks. no one in NATO got that in storage and ready to go, do they?
Only a few people in the Kremlin know how many men Russia is losing, and one of them is not you, so stop pretending your crystal ball works.
news for you. most of the planet doesn't care what happens in Ukraine, but they do care that Russian energy is still exported, they do care Russian grain is exported, they do care to work and trade with Russia. ONLY the deluded Western bubble talks of Russia as a pariah. Get out of the bubble and see the reality, just once!
Russia is winning and everyone knows it. those in denial, like you, make up dumb stuff about sinking economy and heavy losses, ignoring the fact that Ukraine is bankrupt and begging.
Take a dose of reality and regain your senses.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@edwardgiovannelli5191 Nah, you failed.
Nazi Germany was committing genocide on the Jewish people, not on a neighboring state. I mean if Nazi Germany was trying to eliminate every French person, they did a really rotten job!
so, back to the drawing board with that dumb analogy!
But it is curious that Ukraine is the only country to accept, willingly, happily and joyously, a Nazi battalion into its national defence force. at least the Russians pushed the Nazis into a private group and didn't welcome them as part of Russia's national force.
By the way, which other country in the world do you think would recognize, as a national hero, a Nazi collaborator who led a pogrom that killed 4000 Jews? Agree with me, that only Ukraine would stoop so low?
Projection, indeed. Go get another swastika tattoo, Adolf.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@diablosv36 the difference between you and me is you seem to think government can cause a whole bunch of unemployment. It can't.
Market forces and trade create employment, and thus unemployment. Government can only interfere with the market and alter those market forces, slightly redirect of stifle those forces, not cause them.
what on earth is "real capacity"? for that matter, please define "unreal capacity".
You have forgotten what inflation is.
Inflation is an increase in money supply. In Weimar, it became a vicious circle. More money had to be printed to keep paying all the bills until the system collapsed, but maybe that is what you mean by achieving "real capacity"?
Austerity is medicine, not poison.
"the money required to do things".
Again, you are lost.
Money is just a means to exchange goods and services.
If the goods and services aren't there, no amount of money will create the goods and services.
Austerity is just a reality check, your bank manager saying you reached the limit of your credit card, so given we don't want a Weimar, no more irresponsible spending, time to cut back.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bonnie7898 and yet again, completely wrong.
Vinnytsia, not Donbass.
for once, totally right, 100% passionate to correct the wayward, ukro-deluded thoughts that Russia is responsible for this mess in Ukraine.
wrong again, 60 years old, grizzled and semi retired, far from naive, you only have to ask instead of aimlessly speculating, but it seems to be your way, aimlessly speculate when the answers are all at hand.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Alehinn why would I be interested in your comment? No, I didn't read it. Let's read it now.
Ah, as expected, it is just bs.
Look, if you believe in Ukraine's cause, why insist that ALL taxpayers keeping giving away all their hard earned wages to support the futile war?
If you REALLY wanted the Ukronazis to win, you would send them everything you have, even though Zelensky himself refuses to sell any of his properties to fund the war!
Yep, stop being a hypocrite, stop demanding the sensible taxpayers get poor by funding the Ukronazis, and start doing the virtuous thing and confess you are a big admirer of Bandera and his nazi ideology and you will be sending your pay checks to Kiev.
BTW, what is the total amount of dollars the US should send before the president says "enough is enough". 1 trillion? 2 trillion?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@shuli6021 yes, you are right, mostly the US, G7, NATO, EU etc have backed themselves into a corner. some other developing countries are having to pick sides to some extent, and may find themselves a little trapped. like, "oh, you didn't vote for the anti Russian UN proposal, so, no more foreign aid for you, Mozambique", that kind of getting trapped in a corner.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ryaku5 Supplying Ukraine won't stop Putin. NATO has done nothing but supply Ukraine from day one, and Putin has continued killing the Ukronazi scum by the hundreds every day. How is NATO gonna supply Ukraine with more men once Putin has killed all the fighting age Ukrainian men?
1) why does Russia need more civilians? it already has 3 times as many civilians as Ukraine.
2) reclaim oil and gas fields? Ukraine has no oil/gas fields of note, nor does Chechnya, nor Transnistria, nor Abkhazia, nor South Ossetia. All the places Putin has intervened in have no gas/oil fields! All the places Putin has NOT attacked - Azerbaijan, Kazakstan, Turkmenistan, DO have plenty of oil and gas....but Putin has NOT attacked any of them! So, bang goes that theory, Einstein.
3) Putin doesn't want to "bring back" the USSR because, as Putin has pointed out, it was the USSR that created a lot of these problems, like awarding Crimea to Ukraine when most people in Crimea didn't want that. Putin is no supporter of the USSR.
4) Putin may well want Ukraine as a neutral country as a buffer zone against NATO, and this is a reasonable request. Bet the West wished they had sat down with Putin to discuss this in December when, as per point 6 of the Budapest Memorandum, Putin had requested consultations.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ryaku5 again, you need to step back from the nonsense and propaganda you swallow hook line and sinker.
consider the facts.
most of the Russian population, as revealed in opinion polls, approve of Putin.
Ukraine is NOT getting ENOUGH reliable and powerful weapons. If they were, they wouldn't be panic begging for more!
Russia not only has excellent quality weapons, in some areas it has superior weapons, like hypersonic weapons that the West hasn't even put into operation. Again, don't believe the nonsense you hear about Russian inferior weapons.
Iran and N Korea are happy to sell their weapons at a great price, so Russia is more than happy to buy. Iranian drones have wreaked havoc on Ukraine. This is an achievement for Russia, not a weakness.
Again, if we are to believe the lies from your side, Russia is weak, Russia is poor, Russian morale is low, Russia is poorly led, Russia is poorly equipped, yet a bunch of convicts and mercenaries just routed Ukraine's NATO trained and armed battalions in Soledar, Opidnoye and Klyshcheevka. Go figure!
No doubt you also believe the sanctions are working and Russia is isolated!
so naive, you poor sweet child
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@billneave5537 ok, let me address this with the way the French do it (I live in France at the foot of the Pyrenees).
when someone goes missing, they are almost always found within hours, maybe a few days if the weather is bad.
the bulk of the work is investigative, digging deep with background checks, talking to family, friends, knocking on doors. basic sleuthing.
the actual search will reflect the results of the investigation to find out where a person might be AND WHY!
In the Tenerife case, there is a manhunt based SOLELY on the area he was last known to be in! Nothing else. All the other factors that could explain where he was intending to go, why, who else was involved, totally ignored!
The only reason they keep looking into the wilderness is because they didn't find him on the road or close to the road! There is no evidence Jay went into the wilderness!
For 2 weeks the focus should have been what other factors could have led Jay to being taken somewhere else. But no, the whole exercise was to keep searching caves, ravines and places Jay never went to. Truly pathetic reasoning.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@downshift4503 Coins, in the first place, are precious metals that hold a certain value accepted by society as a whole, and this notion predates any formalized government!
If your point is that it is a governmental authority that assumed the role of minting coins, then sure, yes, but those coins were of the value they contained, and governments always knew they needed tax payers contributions to buy the silver first that went into the coins.
You seem to be ignorant that the government has no money! it only has what taxpayers give and what it can borrow. Which silver mine is going to hand over loads of silver to a government that can't pay for it? ain't gonna happen. it starts with the government first assessing taxes in the form of payments in anything that holds universal wealth, and with those initial tax payments, in whatever form, it can start to mint coins.
Raising revenue/wealth through taxation comes first, minting second. it's always been that way. Post barter communities, the first step was for a central power to accumulate a stock of wealth from contributors before minting any coinage!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@downshift4503 and pass the parcel is EXACTLY the nature of the economy, as goods and services are exchanged non stop in a never ending pass the parcel process! Slowly, you are getting it!
If your point is that cash is, these days, originally minted by the government as opposed to individuals writing out IOU's, then sure, an IOU slip is now issued by a central bank, to be used by the public as needed, though individual IOU's are still valid. But that's only cash. Other transactions are just numbers passed around, like pass the parcel, a record of who owes whom a certain debt. Got it?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@MLVL312 I would say when you look at all the countries on the planet, it is clear the vast majority of them are more than happy to keep trading with Russia and working with Russia. The really big countries, like India, China, Pakistan, Nigeria, Brazil, Mexico, South Africa, are fine with Russia. Who cares if Antigua and Barbuda vote against Russia? They have no choice, as they are totally dependent on USA. The irony is that the West has isolated itself from the rest of the world in trying to force the world to isolate Russia! Massive fail!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bonnie7898 oh, I know you are QUITE comfortable with your knowledge, of everything.
The problem is, in reality, you are ignorant and it's obvious.
No, you flatly denied that the Allies ever invaded Germany, stating quite emphatically that it was Russia, not the Allies, that invaded Germany.
You are a fool and an ignoramus. Learn the basics, and in particular, basic English grammar, then get back to me. You dolt!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@robertgannon-cx2mm you seem confused, as you conclude exactly what I concluded.
what you said initially is untrue.
of course there are other legal means to come to the UK, be it by work visa, student visa, tourist visa, all those other legal means are why we have so much legal immigration.
the only people who risk their lives to come to the UK are those who would not qualify for entry to the UK legally, or those who want the adventure.
the risk is low. nearly all make it across and get hotel accommodation. i would definitely take the risk, the odds are excellent. for many of the men, it's a big adventure. they have loads of money to pay for their big adventure, so, yeah, why not try the crossing? something they love to post on instagram in many cases.
my suggestion of applying for asylum from the UK embassy in Paris would work a treat. while in the safe country of France, there will be no persecution while their claim is processed, right?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bonnie7898 Ukraine doesn't have to give up any land at all. Ukraine only had to return to the laws it had in place in 1991, when it became independent.
Had Ukraine allowed full and equal rights to the 17%, as it had in the past, instead of following the extreme nationalist policies of derussification and extreme ukrainianization, tyrannical and exclusive policies that you think are so wonderful, brilliant, inclusive and humane, then none of this would have happened.
The 17%, and Putin, had no problem with Ukraine, 1991 to 2014.
The coup changed everything. Shame on you for supporting the bullying and extremism that pushed the 17% to desperate acts to attain justice.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@First-Last_name Let me educate you on language status:
Canada, only about 20% of the nation's population uses French as a first language, yet French is an official language of Canada, and where French speakers form the majority (mainly Quebec) French is the language of education, government and business. French is broadcast freely on the airwaves.
Ukraine, about 40% of the nation's pre war population used Russian as a first language, but Russian is NOT an official language of Ukraine, and where Russian speakers form the majority (Kherson, Odessa, Kharkov, Zaporozhe, Donbass) Russian is BANNED in education post elementary level and banned from government business. Russian is severely limited in broadcasts on the airwaves.
Study the difference, then you will understand at least one reason why this conflict is happening.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hanshansen3885 You seem to mix things up, so I will make it perfectly clear.
Before Oct 7 the situation concerning the Rafah crossing really didn't change much. Gazans were, with VERY few exceptions, banned from leaving Gaza and banned from entering Egypt..
However, before Oct 7 the situation concerning crossings into Israel didn't change much, with a free flow of Gazans entering Israel and returning to Gaza on a daily basis, along with whatever aid was needed.
Now, you tell me, before Oct 7, which of the two, Israel or Egypt, most resembled the power that was besieging, or cutting off, Gaza?
Only a liar or a fool will answer "Israel".
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hanshansen3885 ah, I see, so children dying, massacres, Western weapons wiping out thousands of innocent civilians, that is not so important to you.
when the two combatants do not share a claim to Western values, then such horrors and evil are of much less importance, right?
But when a democracy like Israel is involved, then time to shine the spotlight on every civilian that dies, correct?
got it. loud and clear.
you must have been absolutely infuriated between 2014 and 2022 then, when Western backed Ukraine was firing missiles into the Donbass, right?
1
-
@hanshansen3885 oh, a word of advice, you need to be a about a LOT more than "facts, numbers and reality".
you need to be about the SOURCES of your beloved "facts, numbers and reality" and always question if your "facts, numbers and reality" are genuine.
Given what happened on Oct 7th, it is amazing Israel allows anything into Gaza.
It should be a stipulation that Hamas release all hostages before ANYTHING be let into that hellhole of terrorism, Gaza.
It's people like you that perpetuate the horrors of terrorism by supporting those against Israel.
Tell me, the 21% of Arabs who live in Israel and are Israeli citizens, how do their lives compare to the other Arabs in the Middle East? Are Israeli Arabs desperate to leave and live in Lebanon, or Syria, or Jordan or Egypt? You like facts. Tell me, yes or no, is there a mass movement of Israeli Arabs to get out of Israel?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stephenjon3502 "used incorrectly". in what way? what should have been done to use it "correctly"?
the "upcoming" Dublin IV Agreement? so, in other words, from Brexit to today, staying in the EU would not have helped one bit in the fight against illegal immigration. you are talking about some vague time in the future!
let's take your example. you are telling me that for every asylum seeker that goes from France to Belgium, France will have to pay 235,000 GBP? we are talking about a Schengen border, where there are no border controls! How the hell does Belgium prove any of its asylum seekers are coming from France, or Germany, or Netherland, or Luxemburg?
Now that our laws are passed in Westminster, and not Brussels, we have the freedom to pass any law we want, thanks to the wise decisions of that 52%. People like you just loved being dictated to by Brussels. Stockholm syndrome.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stephenjon3502 Yes, I have chosen to live abroad, but you talk as if FoM is some kind of unique benefit bestowed on the EU! I have lived in USA, Oman, Bahamas, Mexico, and availed myself of the FoM the world affords. It's not a uniquely EU thing. As I say, you are ignorant about the world and have Stockholm syndrome. You are a Little Europeaner, unable to view the opportunities outside of the EU.
Yes, I want all asylum seekers to apply from their home country, which is the norm for most of the planet. Take a look at what happens to Haitians when they land in the Bahamas and claim "asylum". They are sent back to Haiti immediately.
So, are the Bahamians bigoted for sharing my bigoted views? If the Bahamians are also bigots, sounds like you are making a racist accusation now, but par for the course for someone who is such a bigot like you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@secretname4190 Izyum and Kherson were not "lost". there was no battle (there has only been one battle so far, Mariupol, won by Russia). Izyum and Kherson were evacuated and then abandoned. Izyum, because of lack of men (soon to be rectified by the 380,000 reservists joining the war). Kherson was too difficult to supply, and it is a lot easier to massacre Ukrainian cannon fodder from the left bank of the Dnipro, so demilitarization can proceed apace. Russia is using flexible strategies, as it did in Chechnya and Syria, and it will prevail, after some time, just as it did in Chechnya and Syria.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@climatedeniersbelonginasyl4191 no, WRONG, there is no such thing as "the climate scientists"...did Judith Curry, John Christy, Patrick Moore, Tony Hadler, Robert Lindsen, William Happer, Willie Soon, Ian Plimer mention ANYTHING about a climate emergency? uh, NO!
The REAL climate scientists say there is no climate emergency.
your behavior is laughable. i'll make sure i leave un extra big carbon footprint to make up for your pathetic contribution to "improving" the environment.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@usercoimbar No, I don't believe ALL young Remoaners will switch to being older Brexiteers, but ENOUGH will switch to make it a 50-50 contest.
We were told on polling day that the opinion polls showed Remain would win, so, no, I don't believe the opinion polls reflect what would happen in a real referendum. I do suspect that the calamity that has happened in UK means the Remoaner-loving media would convince millions that Brexit is to blame, but whether that would mean enough of a swing to win a referendum, I'm not so sure.
And yes, finally a point we can agree on, that the Overton Window keeps shifting to the Liberal side, so true Conservatism is dying fast. Explains why people like me feel more at home in Conservative societies like Mexico than in Western Europe. Maybe Serbia or Hungary would be best for me while in Europe.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
MASSIVE MASSIVE WIN FOR PUTIN! All along, Putin has argued for the demining of Ukrainian ports..these agreements are the first steps to that end. Putin has insisted there was never any Russian blockade..he was proven right. All along Putin insisted on clear stipulation that Russian food products and fertilizers and those of Belarus be sanctions exempt, and HE NOW HAS THAT! Putin insisted it was Western sanctions causing the food export problem, the Global South agreed and pressured the West, and again, the West capitulated. On top of all that, the agreements confirm Russian oil can be exported to third countries without limits, so the West can now buy Russian oil from middlemen, like Saudi Arabia or India, no problem, The West can avoid its own sanctions. Beginning of the end, the West in full retreat, Putin on the way to complete victory
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mascot4950 the videos taken of the attack show 30 patriot missiles fired (and those who filmed the attack have been arrested by the SBU, so Ukraine embracing the EU values of free speech and tolerance, obviously).
30 patriot missiles fired, 100,000 to 200,000 USD the cost of each missile? 250 total patriot missiles produced in any year! you talk about bang for their buck, are US taxpayers getting a great deal out of this?
from the video it is pretty clear that the Russians launch a barrage of decoys, the ukronazis in panic fire off all 30 patriot missiles, this enables the Russians to pinpoint the patriot systems which, foolishly, are all located close to each other (in a residential zone) and boom, the kinzhal hits its target. watch the video and tell me I'm wrong.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@The-Real-Ando to me, Ukraine was handed the territory. it didn't take anything!
every time Ukraine and Russia fight toe to toe, street by street, Russia wins. every time.
Russia needed more men to hold its extensive front line, and it now has those men, and more. yet you assume Ukraine, recruiting teenagers and pensioners, with NATO ammo running out, can mount an offensive? really?
You are deluded. If Ukrainians were so motivated to fight, how come the convicts and drunken mercenaries defeated them in Soledar and are currently defeating them in Bakhmut? Motivation is VERY high in the Russian forces. VERY.
Putin is very popular. don't be fooled.
Russian capacity to produce armaments far exceeds NATO's. USA cannot produce in one day what Ukraine uses in one day. but Russia produces 8 times that!
you really must do some more homework and start doubting the Western MSM.
For ten months we have heard that Russia is running out of ammo.
Suddenly, that lie has stopped, and the truth that NATO is out of munitions is being broadcast. get ready for a lot more harsh realities to be announced soon.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@thetombaxter "Assad must go" was the repeated cry of all the Western leaders, who have since gone, but Assad is still in power.
"Putin is on the way out" shout all the Western leaders, who one by one get kicked out, Johnson, Truss, Marin, Draghi, soon Sanchez, Rutte, Macron with no parliamentary majority, Scholz in a shaky coalition, Biden with a year to go. Putin will survive, magnificently. The Prigozhin mutiny showed how solid support for Putin is, No one, all the way from Rostov to Voronezh, came out in support for Prigozhin. Same wouldn't happen if Biden or Macron were challenged!
the deluded, like you, have to keep thinking regime change in Moscow is your only hope, as it is clear sanctions have failed and Russia is winning the war. Keep clutching at straws.
1
-
1
-
@thetombaxter oh, clearly you are ignorant of the situation. let me set you straight.
the aim is not to conquer Ukraine. why would Putin want to inherit places like Lvov where hatred of Russia is boundless? The aim is to complete the 5 objectives as set out at the start (you are aware of the 5 objectives, yeah?)
Remember, before a Russian soldier had set foot in Crimea, the Crimean Parliament in Simferopol had voted 78-0 for separation from Kiev (it's something called a "democratic vote"...an alien concept to you if you are from certain parts of the West, maybe). So, annexing Crimea took no time because almost all of Crimea are ethnic Russians and cheered it on.
Take a look at how long Russia took to eliminate the enemy in Syria. It takes years. Ukraine might take less time, but not a lot less, because Zelensky is more than happy to keep serving up the cannon fodder into the Russian meatgrinder, but still, to eliminate every single fighting age male does take time. end of 2024 is my prediction for the 5 objectives to be declared fulfilled, unless war is declared.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@downshift4503 I have offered evidence. I told you, that in the first days of barter, something had to be given up before anything was received from on high, from any authority.
you need to read some history.
you have already demonstrated that you don't understand the nature of money.
I had to give you the definition and show that barter also acts as money, as it is a means of exchanging goods and services.
now, if you decide to ignore my evidence, that's your choice.
But the fact remains, taxation comes before spending, it always has, and spending cannot happen without reference to revenues in house from past taxation.
you need to re-think everything from scratch, just as those followers of Newton had to do when Einstein clarified some basic laws of the universe.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ThePedroski007 No, the Donbass isn't another country, Peter. It's another TWO countries, the LPR and the DPR, with historical ties and cultural and ethnic connections MUCH closer to Russia than to Ukraine. Thankfully, finally, that reality has brought liberation from Ukraine to those two countries. Peter, is Scotland a country? Peter, is Catalonia a country? Peter, is Kosovo a country? Or is Scotland in Great Britain? Is Catalonia in Spain? Is Kosovo in Serbia? Anyone who has ever been to Ukraine (have you?) will tell you Crimea is the LEAST Ukrainian place on this planet! It Is Russian through and through. The Crimean War, Peter, was fought by Russia, or fought by Ukraine? hmmm
1
-
@gilh3947 Oh, I see, so, once a border is agreed upon, a border can never change, is that right? That is your argument? Once a border is agreed upon, NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENS SUBSEQUENTLY, said borders can NEVER be changed, right? That, Gil, is your argument?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gilh3947 you failed to answer my question! I take it you couldn't answer the question. I'll give you another chance, oh shallow thinking one. Once borders are agreed upon, does that mean said borders can NEVER be altered ever again, yes or no? it is a yes or no question, Gill. What say you? I say, "yes", they can be subsequently altered, that "yes", they are altered all the time, and that in the Donbass, following the 2014 coup d'etat, Donbass Russians had every right to demand they remain part of a democracy. What say you?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@marissaadraincem1239 originally from UK, living in France, but I have worked all over the world. No, we have Armed Forces to defend us against outside aggression, not from separatists. Separatists are citizens who have a right to express themselves and follow their chosen path as debated and agreed upon by the powers over them. Donbass is a place that deserves independence, just like Philippines deserved independence. That is why you should be on the side of the DPR and the LPR, against the monster bully Ukraine, that keeps massacring and forcing its own citizens to obey Ukrainianization. You are on the wrong side of this argument! If you defend your territory, as the Donbass is doing, and you defend it for GOOD reasons, then you should receive international support. It is a shame the Philippines has decided to side with the bully, the Ukrainians.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@vsiegel welfare systems, government jobs and army are paid by French government here in France, people depend on the money, and they risk losing it if they don't behave as the government expects (ask those who refused the covid shot!...sounds the same as Russia, right? or pretty much everywhere?)..It is not a war because war has not been declared! it is that simple. in war, troops are mobilized, the whole economy is put on a war footing, all government efforts are dedicated to the war. When 80% of Russian troops are not at war, which they are not, it isn't a war. Russia wants to achieve certain objectives in Ukraine, not totally destroy and occupy it. Re read the 5 objectives listed by Putin. Did NATO go to war against Libya? No, certain targets were taken out by air forces...NOT a war! There are degrees of military intervention you know, war is just the highest level.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@peabase "soldiers regarded merely as material to be expended in war" would be the definition, so, as per the definition, it has nothing to do with the numbers that die, nor the ratio of those who die compared to the enemy. so, yet again, you prove yourself wrong. do some learning.
Finns used cannon fodder against the Soviets in WW2, as all armies do in a desperate attempt to maintain independence. Fighting for "hearth and home" is not part of the definition. Zelensky throwing in teenagers with 2 weeks training into Bakhmut = use of cannon fodder. And if Finland becomes a NATO member, it must be prepared to do the same, unlike in their recent, neutral history.
Your Soviet barber was right. no overall benefit from foolish military ventures overseas, but that is exactly what Sweden and Finland are heading for, futile carnage and deaths at the behest of warmonger Biden and co, if they join NATO.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kirkpatrick7475 You only remember correctly the propaganda fed to you and which you swallowed hook, line and sinker.
the truth is that Russia is not primarily focused on territory, but on demilitarizing Ukraine, which is moving on apace. When the enemy is destroyed, all the territory you want can be seized.
with a kill rate of 8:1, and 100,000 dead Ukrainian soldiers, demilitarization is going well.
same things were said about the years of warring in Chechnya. There is no timeline for Russia. When "winning" is defined as wiping out the opposition, and preserving one's own forces, it takes a long time. Remember, US needed 6 months to take Fallujah! US occupied Afghanistan for 20 years, and still lost.
Russia is focused on demilitarization and denazification, and Russia has the chance to demilitarize NATO too. It takes time, but it is on track.
Attacking the power grid and other infrastructure is exactly what USA did in Iraq and what NATO did in Serbia. Russia is just following the West's "rules based order", so you should be congratulating Russia.
Stay patient and you will see, in good time, the total destruction and annihilation needed for a clear victory.
what is pathetic is how you have become totally brain washed by Western media.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@glenn Dale 1) The facts on a map show Russian incremental advances, if territory gain is of any great significance. 2) so far, Ukraine is the prison, with no fighting age males allowed to leave, has been a jail for men since day one. Russia, so far, has mobilized reservists with military experience, no one more, and Russia allowed the cowards in fear of conscription to flee (unlike Ukraine). 3) Ukraine is so corrupt that even in the middle of a war, Zelensky has to fire half his top ministers. just another day in Kiev.
Have you been to Ukraine, glenn?
tell me of your personal experiences there, please.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@delos2279 "one side can't just change it after it's signed". Nothing was changed. An addendum, in this case extra signatures, is not a change to the conditions of the treaty. You fail to mention Germany and France. When Germany and France added their signatures, did that, in your skewed version of events, ALSO invalidate the Minsk accords? What is very curious is that when Poroshenko was questioned about Ukraine's refusal to implement the Minsk accords, he didn't mention your argument posited here, about the invalid nature of the treaty. Poroshenko, on the contrary, recognized the validity of the accords, but said refusing to implement them "won us 8 years, 8 years to build up our military and our economy". Forgot to mention that bit, didn't you? As to what you say about Putin's "little green men" I have no idea what you are on about. Sounds like you have confused Yalta with Mars. All I know is that when I was in the Crimea it was bloody obvious the people there were/are Russian. It is one of the least Ukrainian places on this planet. Still, if and when grain flows out of Odessa it will prove you wrong for not taking the word of Russia in an agreement. Let's see what happens. Your russophobia is in an advanced stage..you may well need some mental therapy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@badmonkey2222 the successes mentioned. the kill rate in Russia's favor, the depletion of Ukraine's air defences, the cauldrons around Bakhmut and Avdiivka, the 100% record of every time Russia fights toe to toe, street by street, Russia wins (Popasnaya, Severodonetsk, Mariupol, Lyzychansk, Soledar, Bakhmut) and achieving that with poor leadership, poor equipment, convicts and shovels, according to the West.
where has Ukraine been successful in 2023?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bekeneel Absolutely no idea how many Russians died in those battles, nor how many DPR militia, nor how many LPR militia, nor how many Chechens. No one knows. That's why it is foolish to speculate. Nonsense that attackers suffer more casualties than defenders...one of the reasons to go so cautiously street by street in urban warfare is to minimize casualties. We know from the Ukrainian forces roughly their losses, because Zelensky told us. You are right, indications are that morale very low in Ukraine forces, they fled without a fight, many of them...and so would I if I were an 18 year old reservist from Lvov up against the bloody Chechens! Why would you hope I am not a Putler fanboy? let me guess, "Russia bad, Ukraine good", always, therefore I must be bad?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@WozzaFord-z4z try and do some research and learn some facts before you make a fool of yourself.
Even US opinion research found that the majority of Crimeans considered themselves Russian, not Ukrainian, before 2014. In fact, after Russian, the second most popular answer was "Crimean". the answer of "Ukrainian" came 3rd, with about 15%.
Russian forces came to Crimea AFTER the Crimean Parliament's 78-0 vote to separate from Kiev! Again, it's something called "democracy", a parliamentary vote, it probably doesn't happen much in your country.
The referendum reflected the views expressed in the pre 2014 US survey on Crimean identity.
Do a bit more homework, sweet child, and slowly the truth will be revealed to you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gandalfstormcrow8439 The Budapest Memorandum states Russia won't invade UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES. Now read the clauses under which invasion is permissible! Similarly, the Minsk accords recognize the right of Donbass to autonomy. Poroshenko already declared the intention of the Minsk accords was to buy time. What further proof do you need that Ukraine never even wanted to implement these accords? why would they? it is a country controlled by the Azov Nazis and oligarchs. Every country that is neutral on the invasion of Ukraine, and that would be most of the world in terms of population, is absolutely fine with working with Russia, trading with Russia, tacitly approving of Russia's stance, Remember, Northern Cyprus has only one country that recognizes it! Not wringing your hands over that particular occupation, are you, hypocrite? Your russophobia knows no bounds. Fat, blubbery, woke pathetic USA and West have no idea how to handle Russian might. This will be a bigger humiliation than the pathetic retreat from Kabul. Your goose is cooked. BRICS and dedolarization is the future, to be brought about by Russia's hypersonic missiles, which the "mighty" West can't even deploy yet, so bloody backward!
1
-
1
-
@gandalfstormcrow8439 1) A Jewish puppet president became controlled by Nazis and oligarchs 2) Chechnya became dominated by Muslim extremists who denied ethnic Russian their human rights. Putin restored those rights. 3) Georgia had ethnic Russians who, like the ethnic Russians of Ukraine, wanted union with Russia. Putin liberated them. 4) Belarus is basically Russian, no discrimination against Russian speakers there because Russian is the official language 5) The West agreed to allow annexation of the Sudetenland. Makes sense, German speakers united with Germany. However, German speakers were NOT discriminated against in the rest of Czechosolovakia, so no justification can be found for the Nazi invasion there (unlike in today's Ukraine, where enormous discrimination against Russian speakers demands intervention and union with Russia, a la Sudetenland) 6) Ukraine must be destroyed because Ukraine refuses to treat its ethnic Russians equally and fairly. Putin is a man of his word. Chechnya, Transnistria, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, now Ukraine (maybe Latvia next?). Treat your ethnic Russians fairly, or suffer the consequences, Simple, just rule,,,some leaders are slow learners. The overflowing sh** is coming from Azov Nazi Ukraine. You will be destroyed and NATO's arsenal and funding with it. Bye Bye Ukraine. Next up for justice for treating ethnic Russians badly? Hello Latvia!:)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@RS-hr8mj 1) The fascists are the ones with swastika tattoos, welcomed into the national defense force of Ukraine, not Russia 2) Most of the world has rejected the West and is happy to work with and trade with Russia, from China to India to Brazil, Mexico, Saudi, Turkey the list is endless. The West lives in a deluded bubble and is rejected by most of the world. 3) Yes, I believe and know you would support Nazis. that is exactly what you are doing 4) you wouldn't know a Nazi if it passed you in the street in Kiev, Kribvy Rok or Cleveland. You have to talk to them and listen to them in places like Bar Baracas, Vinntsya. 5) In Chechnya, Transnistria, Abkazia, Chechnya and South Ossetia the rights of ethnic Russians were protected by Putin. And he will always stand up for those rights and he has the guts to do that in the future. The monstrosity of nations are those places that treat ethnic Russians as second class citizens. Long may such russophobic, barbaric, bigoted and intolerant places eat shit and die. Slava Rossiyi, Slava Donbasu
1
-
1
-
@Anton_Danylchenko 1) Unlike you, the European Parliament is NOT proud of Bandera. The European Parliament condemned the award of National Hero to Bandera. So, I guess the European Parliament condemns you too.2) If I learned fake history, then so did the European Parliament, and Poland, and several Jewish organizations. Funny how we all learned fake history, but not you. 3) Yes, Azov Nazi Ukraine tried to attack and shell Donbass repeatedly and you tried to cut off Crimea from its water supply. You discriminated against Russian speakers, you overthrew a democratically elected president, your country is the scum of the earth and deserves to be obliterated, which hopefully will happen soon. Russia is sticking up for ethnic Russians and deserves a total victory. Zelensky has bankrupted you, turned you into a nation of refugees and corrupt beggars, you will lose and be abandoned by the West...but Zelensky will still have his mansion in Miami and his villa in Italy. Slava Rossiyi....glory to the proud Russian speakers the world over.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gandalfstormcrow8439 yep! 16,000 is what the Kremlin is claiming, and 16,000 is what BBC/Meduza found! So the Russians were telling the truth!
The mobilization of 300,000 happened not because of the 16,000 dead, but because the Special Military Operation was intended to just get Ukraine to the negotiating table. Given that NATO/Ukronazis decided to fight to the last Ukrainian, and given Russia expended its territorial aims, reservists were, and are, needed. Idiot!
you need to start learning the truth and stop regurgitating the Western propaganda!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jasonodlin8305 "stalemate" is a Russian win because when you go through the 5 objectives of Russia's invasion, you see Russia is close to attaining all 5. You tell me which of the 5 objectives are beyond Russia's grasp now.
On the other hand, how close is Ukraine to liberating Crimea? liberating Lugansk? liberating Donetsk?
how close is the West to smashing the Russian economy to the point that Russia cannot wage war? (4% economic growth forecast by the IMF for Russia in 2024, recession for Germany and probably UK).
how isolated is Russia? ask any of its allies, China, India, OPEC, BRICS, Latin America, Africa, + all other sanctioned nations (Iran, N Korea, Venezuela)?
Only the blind and deluded fail to see how much of a massive win for Russia this is, and what an epic fail for the woke, stumbling pathetic West.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jasonodlin8305 you got it right the first time, but got it wrong the second time.
you are right, a military budget is spent on national defence.
Ukraine is not part of the UK nation, nor the French nation, nor the German nation etc. Therefore, not one single penny of any national defence budget was ever ear-marked for Ukraine.
What you got wrong was assuming that a nation's defence budget would be put to good use if applied to Ukraine, which you claim is defending the West (though it isn't at all). The West's defence budgets would ONLY be put to good use IF the West were truly threatened by Russia, which they are not, AND if Ukraine was actually in a position to win, which it is not.
Therefore, all this massive amount of taxpayer funded national defence spending is being thrown away to a corrupt Kiev regime, on a futile war that Ukraine has already lost, and on defending the West that is not even threatened by Russia in any way.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@MelkorPT You will find that the EU does need to prove that he's a criminal, because the nebulous world of "not following rules" will take on the appearance of a witch-hunt, which of course is exactly what it is. The EU will need to prove criminal activity, otherwise Orban will garner a lot of support from other EU sceptic governments, starting with the new Italian one soon to be elected. Yes, in 3 months time, when half the EU is out of energy, with inflation rates higher even than Latvia's is now, and with mass protests in the street, the EU will have to do a whole lot more than find Orban guilty of a crime! As for Article 50, Hungary has found another option.....remain in the EU and veto every damn measure than needs unanimity. Orban can absolutely wreck the EU from within if he chooses, but as I say, given that the EU is doing a masterful job of wrecking itself, it might not need Orban to finish the job.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@issimondias all you are doing is giving me multiple examples of how reporters distort what is actually said.
I base my information on what Brad actually said, not on what I believe he said .
Within the interviewer's question, she actually asks TWO distinct questions.
1. Did you see Jay's feet slipping down?
and then a follow up question.
2. Did you hear him slipping?
Now, listen carefully to Brad's answer. Brad says NOTHING about seeing anything. Brad addresses ONLY the second question, and confirms he HEARD the sound of gravel, you know what I mean, stones.
The interviewer never pressed him on what he saw. If your point is that Brad's words were repeatedly misreported, I 100% agree with you.
I don't deal with misreporting. I deal with what was said, I recommend you do the same. For example, Lucy never said that Jay was thirsty, Check her precise words!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Historia.Magistra.Vitae. Going to follow up on adopting your "wrong" start to replies, with your repeated use of "historical definition" phrase and "historical facts" line.
WRONG. Historical definition and historical facts show quite clearly that the Salazar, Franco and Hitler regimes were all Fascist, Far Right and......let me see, oh, let me copy you, no sources needed, so, yeah, my views are all historical definition and historical facts, yours are all just unsubstantiated blather, so, WRONG!
Like my new style of writing?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Asdfgghhhjj Putin has been in power for decades. There is no pattern of Putin invading European countries, and there won't be after Ukraine is dealt with. The common denominator in Russia's military interventions is that when ethnic Russians have their rights removed and are discriminated against, Putin will use force to restore their rights. Then peace is established. Chechnya - Russia restores rights for Russians and defeats nationalists. Ditto Abkhazia, ditto South Ossetia, ditto Transnistra. All those places now live in peace. Ukraine will end up the same, rights restored and peace established. I mean if Latvia wants to shell its Russian speakers and ban the Russian language like Ukraine did, then yeah, probably Putin will intervene in Latvia, but he would be right to do so, and you and I would support him, right? OR..you PREFER Azov Nazis have free reign to shell Donbass civilians for 8 years. Prefer that, do you?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DiogoJ1 Nonsense. First of all, you need to decide if Ukraine SHOULD be defended. Personally, a country that incorporates swastika tattooed Nazis into its ranks and shells the Donbass for 8 years deserves NO defending, in my view, but then again, I'm an anti Fascist! I mean if you want to defend such a monstrous Nazi russophobic regime, fine, but not me, and not the civilized world. Given the conflict is raging, Ukraine, with US support, needs to sue for peace and accept Russian terms. It's the only way to save lives. Russia's opponents has gone through this before, and Chechnya, Georgia and Transnistra all returned to peace, don't fret. Ukraine needs to treat any Russian speaking minorities fairly and all will be well. Russia has pretty much killed, crippled or captured the Nazis (despite people like you opposing this effort), so that objective is close to completion. Ever seen an Azov parade in Ukraine, have you?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@alainlefebvre9860 sure, NATO would shred Russia just like it did the sandal wearing goatherders, the Taliban, when they strolled into Kabul last year. I mean NATO DID manage to drone an innocent Afghan family to death, so I suppose NATO proved its worth there. NATO said it would take 90 days for the Taliban to take Kabul, Took 90 hours! NATO is far too busy talking about electric tanks, diversity in the ranks, sensitivity training for it to be a serious threat. NATO countries, especially its main component, USA, are blubbery, divided snowflake nations that, 3 days of the media showing bodybags of massacred troops being flown home, would sue for peace immediately. NATO has no guts to fight Chechens street by street. And if NATO has all these weapons it could send Ukraine, why is it refusing to send them?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bonnie7898 in the British system, honey, the British citizens are voting for 3 separate things with their one vote.
1....who their MP will be
2....which party will form a government
3....who the nation's PM will be.
Rishi Sunak was elected as MP, but Boris Johnson was elected as PM.
Rishi Sunak has never stood for election as PM. What a fake democracy!
Thanks for confirming that the de facto EU leader is elected by ZERO EU citizens. Ursula Van der Leyen attends G7 conferences as the voice of the EU having secured as many votes as I did from EU citizens. A democracy, it is not.
Of the 370 Ukrainian political parties, how many of them honor Stefan Bandera, the Nazi who murdered 4000 Jews in Lvov, as a national hero?
Elections are not held according to how many people in a poll want elections or not.
in real countries, elections are held according to the electoral law of the land. the electoral law in Ukronazia states that elections are to held this year. we both know why, honey, this ain't gonna happen. Democracy in Ukraine was thrown out the window when Yanushenko was deposed against the rules of the Ukraine constitution.
figured out who the Allies were in WW2 yet?
you are so very ignorant. choose better reading material.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@socillizt4life read what I said carefully. you need some reading comprehension practice.
i make no comment on what the law says or does not say. i speak of what is just and what is true. so i don't care what the law says on an issue, only what is right.
i will repeat the truth. given that there is no political persecution of migrants in France, and given that there is no situation in France from which anyone needs to seek refuge, any illegal immigrant arriving in the UK from France is neither a refugee nor in need of any asylum. those are the facts, whatever the screwed up law says. deal with it.
if some catastrophe hit the UK I have no idea where UK citizens would be allowed to go. All I know is that if, after said catastrophe, thousands upon thousands of UK citizens traversed a dozen countries and all decided to enter Afghanistan illegally, Afghanistan would be totally justified in saying "NO!. You were perfectly safe when you were in Uzbekistan, so, no, you are not allowed in Afghanistan".
That would be the correct and just response.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@brinjoness3386 and, wow, look, your approach has led to 10 million Ukrainian refugees, a bankrupt and begging Ukraine, hundreds of thousands of young Ukrainian men killed and crippled in the Russian meatgrinder, 12 failed EU sanctions packages, an energy crisis in the West, dedollarization, an alliance of BRICS and OPEC+ dictating energy prices to the recession hit West.
Going really well, your approach, eh?
at least you can feel virtuous with your empty "slava Ukraine" and pretty little blue and yellow flag.
feel good about backing Nazis do you?
google "Reuters 2018 Ukraine far right" and see the people you are supporting.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The idiots, Bleksley, are those who think waves of mass immigration are a really good idea.
The idiots, Bleksley, are those, like you, who don't understand that eggs have to be broken to make an omelet
The idiots, Bleksley, are those who refuse to address the concerns of the protesters.
All power to the rioters, wear down the police with repeated mass protests, choke the courts, challenge the government every day.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@timeames2509 yep. the Novaya Rossiya territories are certainly in a gray area it seems. I mean if Putin nuked London in protest that NATO was helping an attack on "Russia" it would be a shock, but indeed, what is the definition of "Russia" in Putin's mind?
If it includes Crimea, then I have a feeling we will find out soon, and Poland may get a conventional missile or two if Crimea is hit.
A popular outcry in non Crimean Russia, somewhere like Belgorod, if it were hit big time, would probably mean a conventional missile attack on somewhere that no one cares about, like Estonia, just to see if NATO does anything but whine.
Personally, if I were Putin, I would wait for Finland to join NATO and drop one on Helsinki as a welcome gift.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@cog600 Soledar was important not because of its size but because of the humiliation of the NATO loss. low morale among Russian troops we were told, poorly led, we were told, poorly equipped, we were told, up against NATO trained and equipped heroes fighting for their homeland, we were told, and the convicts and drunken mercenaries WON! oh boy, almost as humiliating as seeing the Taliban kick NATO out of Kabul last year, funny, but humiliating.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@cog600 oh well, if all the evidence is backed up by photos on the internet, then it must be true! oh man, you are such a sucker.
who did the verifying and why do you trust this verifier?
again, you refuse to answer the question. if Russia is too weak to be a threat, why are NATO talking about stopping Russia in Ukraine to prevent Russia from attacking other countries?
you know, since March we have heard "Russia is running out of weapons". at what point do you stop believing this wishful thinking?
and again, you refuse to answer...if NATO has such an abundance of weapons, why does NATO refuse to send all that Ukraine is asking for?
Russia is fighting this war to protect the rights and freedoms of the ethnic Russians in Ukraine. Russia did the same in Chechnya, and won. Russia did the same in Abkhazia, and won. Russia did the same in South Ossetia, and won. Russia did the same in Transnistria, and won. Russia took years to defeat the jihadists in Syria, and won. And Russia will do so in Ukraine. Once NATO is demilitarized, Latvia will be up next, and NATO will be too cowardly to do anything.
Kabul in 2021 told you how pathetic NATO is. But like Napoleon and Hitler, you think you know best. deluded imbecile.
1
-
@cog600 your "answer" is not an answer. you basically say there is a sliding scale. the longer the war goes on, the less of a threat Russia is to the rest of Europe,
But as usual, the facts on the ground don't match your nonsense theory. If you were right, there would be fewer and fewer concerns for Europe's safety as time elapsed. However, that is not true, As time moves on, we hear more and more panicked shouts for Russia to be stopped because "who knows which country is the next victim?"
There is not one single world leader that has said "you know, the longer this war continues, the safer and safer Europe becomes". Not one.
Russia is going from strength to strength. Ruble strong, IMF forecast economic growth, revenues from energy exports rising, and when NATO is totally demoralized and demilitarized, Russia will be able to occupy the ethnic Russian portion of Latvia with not even a whimper from the gutless West. After Kabul, the whole world knows NATO is a paper tiger.
and pathetic suckers like you keep believing the nonsense of the Western press. sad.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@timeames2509 the silence from Biden, Sullivan and others over the Nordstream allegations is turning the world against USA even more. No Russian denial of anything has the BRICS nations upset at all.
No Western fighter jets are lined up to go anywhere. Zelensky is begging, but so far got nothing. So far both Germany and USA have said "no", UK has said training pilots only, no jets, so, you tell me, where are these jets coming from?
Russia has air superiority over Ukraine, bus as I explained, Russia knows air superiority does nothing to demilitarize a country. USA had 20 years of air superiority over the Taliban, and lost Afghanistan to the Taliban!
Demilitarization is killing all the fighting age men. Planes can't do that. Chechens, convicts and mercenaries can.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@timeames2509 assuming the Nordstream sabotage was done by US, what would be Biden's objective? to force his German ally to buy more expensive US energy? Nice ally!
If Putin wanted to erase Ukrainian existence, why wait decades? besides, there is no evidence Putin would want such a thing.
Putin, like me, believes Ukraine is an artificial country. like Belgium, doesn't have any roots as an independent or separate entity. But I don't believe either Ukraine or Belgium should be erased from the map. And I don't believe Putin thinks that. The last thing Putin wants is eternal guerriila war in Western Ukraine where he knows people hate Russia! makes no sense!
Putin liberated the ethnic Russians of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, but never seized all of Georgia. He did the same with Transnistria, never tried to seize Moldova. makes no sense.
Putin would attack Poland if Poland decided to enter the Ukraine conflict. Hopefully Poland has enough sense to stay out of it.
Many of us suspect NATO would apply article 5 by talking about how to respond to a Russian incursion, but would not actually fight. Putin probably wouldn't risk an attack to see, but he might.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@VonZollern I never mentioned what people call themselves, or what they call each other. Neither did I mention how things were before 2000.
So, for the third time I will state what I said, and see if you agree or disagree.
I said that anyone born in Romania, gypsy or non gypsy, is considered, by the authorities, to be a Romanian national, and qualifies for a Romanian passport.
Now, is what I said correct, or incorrect?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@andrewadams6905 what should be really concerning for you, if you weren't living in a fantasy world, would be the fact that every time the Ukrainians and the Russians fight toe to toe, street by street, building by building, the Ukrainians lose! Every time!
Mariupol, Severodonetsk, Lyzichansk, Popasnaya, Bakhmut, Marinka, Avdeevka, and now Robotyne.
Just how good is NATO training if Ukraine loses, every time, to drunken convicts with low morale fighting with shovels?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@alocalstalker3231 of course, all dictionaries offer both definitions of nationality.
however, YOU are the one that said I was confused between ethnicity and nationality, and that nationality was EXCLUSIVELY concerned with the right to live in a certain country.
YOU are the one that cherry picked and refused to accept that "nationality" could be linked to origins, language, traditions, ethnicity etc.
now, go back to my original statement, read it, and see if, ACCORDING TO ONE OF THE DEFINITIONS OF NATIONALITY OFFERED BY THE CAMBRIDGE DICTIONARY, what I said is true.
you see, some of us actually know what we are talking about when we make statements.
we don't assume we know every single definition of every single word.
you have learned a lesson today:)
check your dictionary first before you start correcting others on a particular valid definition they have chosen to apply.
1
-
@alocalstalker3231 Again, I never said you did claim to be 100% Danish!
Again, your reading comprehension skills in English are very weak.
Quote me the words I used that said you claim to be 100% Danish!
You cannot be 100% Danish as per the dictionary's second definition (the definition you choose to ignore because it is so inconvenient to your argument) because of the origins of your parents.
We both agreed that "nationality", when used strictly to mean the document that entitles you to reside permanently and have the rights of citizen of a certain country, is what makes you Danish on paper, but my whole point is that for most of the planet, nationality is also something much much deeper than a document, and is linked to ethnicity, origins, background, traditions.
By the second definition, you are from being Danish, just as I am far from being Bahamian, though I have the passport of that country.
Next time "nationality" is mentioned, consider BOTH definitions before you start telling the other person how wrong they are!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@alejandror.planas9802 ¡exacto! la lengua local es la lengua hablada fluentemente por la mayoría.
Pues, en partes de Bruselas y París, la lengua local es árabe, y, de verdad, habrá otras ciudades en Europa que se encontrarán en la misma situación en los años que vienen.
Pero la "lingua franca" en París y Bruselas es francés, como la "lingua franca" en Cataluña es castellano, pues es muy útil conocer francés en Francia y en Bélgica, como es muy útil conocer castellano en Cataluña.
Vivo cerca de Perpiñan, (Catalogne du Nord) donde hay colegios que ofrecen catalán como asignatura opcional. Si tuvieras niños en el sistema escolar en Perpiñan, ¿cual opción escogerías tú? inglés o catalán? y ¿por qué?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@VLF2022 oui, c'est bien possible, mais je répete pour la troiseme fois, le silence n'est pas gardé quand il y a une victoire. Si Zelensky croit que la perte de 3000 soldats pour aucun territoire represente une victoire, il ferait beaucoup de bruit de ça, et, au contraire, il ne dit rien. Kherson n'eatait pas une victoire et voila le silence. Oh, je sais, TU le considere comme un succes énorme, Kherson est vraiment un triomphe qui change tout, et les 3000 morts sont, bof, juste un petit malheur, mais pour beaucoup de monde, silence sur Kherson = pas de victoire:)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@CelticSaint going to bother you with one other thing on my mind.
Ofelia.
The only eyewitness to claim Jay was at the bus stop and walking along the road.
This is pretty strange too.
Sure, Masca is a hamlet, just a few buildings, but not one other person saw Jay at the bus stop. more remarkable is that, given Jay was walking along a road that i would guess would be pretty busy at 8.30 on a Monday morning, walking along that road for at least 15 minutes, not one other eyewitness has come forward to say "yes, definitely passed this guy on the road that morning"? not one?
Can't think why Ofelia would make this all up, and after all, Jay's phone pinged the tower outside Masca at 8:50 ish, but, mighty strange she is the only person to say she saw him.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stealthbum34 1) Brexiteers are, by and large, free marketeers that DON'T believe in trade barriers! What trade barriers have Brexiteers EVER insisted upon? 2) Leaving the EU means the UK has the freedom to negotiate whatever trade deals and tariffs it desires. Those tariffs may be higher, lower, or zero compared to what we had in the EU. The point is, UK has the FREEDOM to negotiate what we want, and not FORCED to follow the dictates of Brussels! I know "freedom" is a strange concept for the brainwashed Remoaner! 3) I didn't say the EU ignores trade deals. I said Remoaners ignore the benefits of trade deals with the rest of the planet and always focus on the frictionless trade of a tiny blob on the world map called "EU". it is narrow-minded. Little Europeaners. 4) Coal is indeed finite. So what? When we start to run short of coal the market price will drive it up beyond the price of renewable energy. so let's use coal til we get to that point. basic economics. 5) Left Wing thinking is not even thinking short term, mid term or long term! Your thinking is just idealism, fantasy and what you can virtue signal about. in the real world, coal is a solution that your useless windmills can't provide, yet. Get real and learn the basics.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stealthbum34 1) Only legal immigrants who go through the entire immigration process will pay the surcharge you mention. I know a few of them. This surcharge, by the way, goes nowhere NEAR covering the expenses of the extended family that inevitably follow. Go to your local A and E and make a note of the enormous immigrant presence
2) Illegal immigrants pay nothing, hands out, waiting for the taxpayer to cover all expenses. it's a disgrace and needs to be stopped. Parasites, the lot of them.
3) Some immigrants who stay end up paying contributions. The majority do not, and on balance, immigrants are net recipients, not contributors, by a long way.
3) The skilled workers Britain needs should be enticed here by the legal immigration process. But more importantly, converting the masses of unemployed and under employed already here into productive members of society should be the aim.
4) Funnily enough, countries that have no illegal immigration, Japan, Korea, etc, have no big problems with skilled labor. so, bang goes the theory that a modern economy needs immigrant labor. it is nonsense.
5) Yes, the rich dodge taxes, so, either fix the laws so that they can't dodge, or reduce taxes so they are not tempted to. Your argument that the "rich dodge paying taxes" is confirmation that taxes are too high.
6) My arguments are indeed old, because they have stood the test of time, and they still apply today.
Keep learning the reality of the world and you will eventually see that Socialism is a road to ruin, because it involves taking other people's money and spending it on a lot of stuff (NHS) that doesn't work.
1
-
@stealthbum34 you are obviously not that good at reading comprehension. I have not denied that Conservative governments have made a mess of things, but I stated very clearly that there is no difference between the Blair New Labour gang and the new soppy Conservatives. Try to stop thinking in terms of party politics. It's meaningless. Think in terms of issues, like Brexit, Green energy, immigration, sanctions on Russia, because it's the issues of today that divide the country, and it is not on party lines. Believe me, your type have no clue how to build anything, be it out of ashes or whatever. All you can do is think of destructive ways to steal more money from the producers of the country, then scratch your heads when the NHS falls apart. Useless bunch of envious do-nothings that covet the hard earned money of the workers and want to spend it on pet projects destined to fail. Gullible losers.
1
-
1
-
@stealthbum34 it's not right wing rhetoric. it's common sense.
Socialism has clearly failed. look at Cuba, Venezuela, USSR.
of course, I watched the video. Bunch of losers whining when they should be analyzing what exactly has gone wrong, but they are too busy wringing their hands in angst and demanding handouts that they haven't got time to figure out what went wrong.
UK has abandoned the basics of capitalism and embraced excessive government intervention. and yes, the Tories are as much to blame as Labour, though Blair in particular thought it was a really good idea to import masses of parasitic immigrants.
UK got exactly what it deserves, and that is why I am happy to avoid the place and spend time in places that are safer, freer, and have maintained a sense of national identity. Britain is a sad, lost cause.
1
-
@stealthbum34 no, didn't come just to argue, more to show how the virtue signalling Left, like you, are really selfish and ignorant and back causes that ruin the peoples' lives. Just trying to make you see some sense.
For example, never again will you spout that nonsense about modern economies needing immigrant labour. I told you, Japan, Korea, China, no immigration, but safe, clean, expanding modern economies.
now you have learnt something you are a slightly better person. "Diversity is our strength" you say? Hard to explain the rise in crime in London, almost all of which is committed by immigrants, compared to super safe Japan, no immigrants, totally safe.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stealthbum34 xenophobic pensioner?
a polyglot who lives in Europe and is married to a Bahamian and works for a living is a xenophobic pensioner? again, your assumptions are so wayward you should be embarrassed.
the UK WAS capable of matching Japan's standards, social cohesion and safety, but too much immigration has ruined Britain. You are too young to realize, but places like Birmingham used to be pleasant enough, instead of the shitholes they are now.
It's not Conservatism that has ruined Britain, but the masses' fundamental lack of understanding about what makes a society work.
Give me Mexico, Japan, Russia over what most of Europe has become. Malmo is like Marrakesh, but worse. Waiting for a train in Luxemburg you would think you were in the Congo. Anti immigration is not xenophobic, and until you get the difference you will fail to understand the nuts and bolts of social collapse.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@thegreatdane3627 on the contrary. I'm schooling you on how prices work!
you tell me, when the West cuts off its supply of cheap Russian energy, but demand remains more or less the same, how can that result in deflationary pressures on energy prices as opposed to inflationary pressures? talk me through it step by step.
balancing a budget does not depend on a certain oil price! a nation's budget is balanced, or not, according to a whole myriad of factors, so, again, you are infantile in your assessment of how budgets work! It is absolutely priceless to hear a European lecturing on how Russia is suffering a budget deficit!
China and India are benefitting enormously from Western energy sanctions on Russia. and Russia is surviving quite well in the transitionary period while it focuses on exporting to Asia. BTW, once India has refined Russian oil, there are no sanctions on that refined Russian oil being blended and imported to the EU! So the Indians, as wise middlemen, hike up the price, cause more misery in Europe and that leads to more and more strikes. start thinking.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@thegreatdane3627 ok, back to basics.
supply and demand is the mechanism whereby a price is established. if inflation were simply connected to supply and demand, the price of milk would remain stable, as any increase in demand would be met by an increase in supply. but that isn't happening.
inflation is when the purchasing power of your money decreases due, in some cases, to rising costs and rising prices. Dairy products are a lot more expensive because the costs of production have gone up, and those costs are passed on to the consumer. inflation can also occur when the currency loses its value due to printing money and extra money supply. inflation is way beyond a simple supply and demand graph.
where you are right is that one way of reducing inflation is, if supply can't be boosted, to reduce demand, so higher interest rates restricts disposable income for consumer spending.
But in the inflation that has hit the West, the key question is what caused the jump in production costs that inflated prices for basic goods? one massive factor is the sanctions on Russia. The removal of cheap Russian energy from Western markets boosted global energy prices, hello inflation.
anyone sane can see this. only those who refuse to admit sanctions on Russia could possibly have negative repercussions for the West keep their heads buried in the sand.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@markkawecki7582 given that Ukraine is totally funded by NATO, trained by NATO, armed by NATO. backed by NATO to the hilt over the last 8 years, then we can say, NO, the NATO/Ukraine alliance has failed miserably. I mean if you think going bankrupt, having 7 million refugees, losing 70,000 troops, 20% of your territory and that is only to date, represents success, then I would guess you viewed the panicked fiasco of a NATO exit from Kabul last year as a phenomenal success, right?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@lorenzcassidy3960 Happy to trade with Russia; ....China, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Iran, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Indonesia, Turkey, Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Nigeria, Peru, Congo, Hungary, Serbia, Israel, Egypt...the list goes on and on. And you say Russia is isolated? The West has failed with its sanctions and to isolate Russia. Enjoy your inflation ridden freezing miserable winter. you thoroughly deserve it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
and so the escalation goes.....sanctions failed, isolating Russia failed, stingers failed, javelins failed, M777s failed, himars failed, tanks from ex Warsaw Pact countries failed, now Western tanks will fail, and when F16s get shot down by Russian air defence systems, we then arrive at nukes. so, how about we just go straight to the end of the escalator and have a nuclear war to see who wins?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@silvasdamata oh boy, then you need to do some more research on candidates and their exclusion from the list of candidates!
Yes or no question, did you hear, recently, about the state of Colorado removing Donald Trump's name from the state ballot?
Tell me who was the Labour party candidate in the recent Rochdale by election in the UK?
Tell me why, exactly, 2 Reform Party candidates were removed as candidates recently in the UK.
These things happen all the time.
Russians are not particularly inept at filing paperwork, but Russia is the rule, not the exception, when, for various reasons, candidates are removed from an electoral list.
That said, the polls in Russia, even polls recognized as legitimate by Western media, put Putin's approval rating at about 80%, and this was reflected in the actual vote.
what % do you think Putin would have received if both the candidates you mentioned had been running?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@owenthomas5103 you are so right. you misused the word genocide. there was no genocide happening in Afghanistan, but the US invaded anyway.
so how does the US and NATO decide when invasion is justified? Afghanistan is far from unique in its brutal suppression and mass killings of women. Iran. Pakistan, Saudi Arabia. North Korea. who decides between "brutal enough for invasion" and "not brutal enough"? how does this "rules based international order" work, because to me, a sovereign country is a sovereign country, its territorial integrity is sacrosanct. who plays God and says "8 years of brutal shelling of the Russians in Donbass is acceptable, but those Taliban, no, they must be destroyed"? who is that person? you?
the attempted genocide in Ukraine was the desire by the Nazi regime there, the oligarchs and Azovs who pull Zelensky's strings, to FORCE the ethnic Russians to derussify and become suppressed to all all diktats from Kiev, OR be wiped out. The only thing that stopped the genocide of the Donbass Russians was Putin's arms and support, thank God. why you choose to support the nationalist extremists in Kiev is bloody unbelievable.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@AA-vi1cc here are some simple questions for you.
what makes Judith Curry "a joke"? please specify with reference to her work.
Ditto Patrick Moore, Richard Lindzen, William Happer, Steven Koonin, Ian Plimer.
Now, to John Christy.
Of course Christy assesses temperatures at 25,000 feet. If you want to assess the greenhouse effect, you have to assess the bloody roof of the greenhouse, not just the surface, you dope!
"he cherry picks data"
Every single researcher cherry picks data. That's how you build a case and an argument! There is not one single scientist that includes EVERY datum in any theory!
"not peer reviewed"
Given that almost all the peers are all locked into the same alarmist narrative, because they are paid to spout such narrative, what's the point of peer review?
If Christy is such a joke, why would any scientist bother writing a paper to refute Christy's joke ideas? Why would such a joke be invited to testify in front of Congress?
Seems like your idea of a "joke" is simply someone opposing your assumptions!
Tell me, when you pump CO2 into a greenhouse, does the temperature shoot up? yes or no question
Finally, list 3 positives about global warming.
Now we'll see what you're made of.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hendrixinfinity3992 ah, we start to get to the heart of your twisted logic.
So the white working class lads out rioting are NOT Far Right if they accept people's right to live non traditionally! Yet, without asking any of them if they are ok with non traditional life styles, they get labelled "Far Right" instead of just "right". I am sure you would agree, they have been mis-labelled.
And all Muslims believe in traditionalism, so, all Muslims who believe homosexuality is a sin are Far Right?
So, Stalin is Right? ALL those historians and academics and media and most of the world, they got all this wrong! Stalin was not a Socialist or a Communist, he was of the Right! Wow, that's amazing.
Stalin believed in a mixed market economy? Apart from the tale end of Lenin's NEP, which parts of the Soviet economy were based on private enterprise? cue crickets.
All those kulaks were massacred because they insisted on private enterprise, and Stalin did too! This is hilarious!
It's not that I think I'm smart. It's that I can see thru your bs from the start, and I note how you lecture, but never answer any of my basic questions.
The Pope would be Far Right, correct?
1
-
1
-
@hendrixinfinity3992 nice side-step! the ever predictable "Overton Window" answer.
So, let me sum up.
You lied when you said all those who campaigned for civil liberties were on the Left.
100 years ago, those who campaigned for abolishing slavery were NOT on the Left People like Marx and Engels were on the Left, not Wilberforce.
UNLESS WE PLAY WITH THE OVERTON WINDOW (read "shifting the goalposts as we wish) We, the Left, can't justify whatever warped views we have.
What has truly shifted is how the far Left now consider anything NOT far Left to be somehow Far Right! Catholics, Muslims, anti immigrants, those who support a balanced budget, entrepreneurs, those who believe in traditional family values, all are Far Right, or right!
Conclusion = you have redefined things to an absurd point where the Far right are the vast majority of the world!
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hendrixinfinity3992 "they don't warrant a response" = I give up, I've lost the argument.
As I pointed out, hierarchies exist in the animal world, hierarchies are a feature of biology, and to ascribe hierarchies to being a right wing construct is just infantile.
in essence, based on your nonsensical view of hierarchy, all governments are right wing, and all communities are right wing, because they all rely on a hierarchy. Yes, even your hippy commune will have someone handling the finances and pulling the strings.
I have no Left wing/Right wing axis! I believe it is all woolly nonsense and only specific beliefs can be talked of as being of benefit or not.
It's YOU that insists on the labels, not me! I have nothing to explain, and that is why I see nothing Left nor Right about rioters wanting to reclaim their country back to what it was when they liked it.
You are a naive Lefty that has never truly been challenged, and as I pointed out, to state Stalin was open to free market economics is simply hilarious. you love to lecture, but refuse to answer simple questions. the epitome of someone who understands very little.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hendrixinfinity3992 I'm pretty sure I have read a lot more than you, so no lectures needed. Got a BA in Spanish and Russian, MA in English and Spanish, speak 8 languages, retired teacher and lecturer, been to over 100 countries and worked for long periods in such disparate locations as Oman, USA, Bahamas, France and Colombia. No lectures needed from the likes of you.
I'm not disparaging reading at all. Your own reading comprehension of my words is poor. I pointed out that what YOU need is LESS reading COMPARED with thought, reflection, careful observation of the world, and listening to the opinions of people like me.
What makes you think I have never spoken to union leaders? you assume way too much. "fair pay and adequate time off" are subjective things. both, i would argue, have already been settled by market forces. left wing politics just aims to meddle with the market to benefit the few (union members) at the expense of the rest of society.
The only misinformation spread is by the Left. As I said, put down your lefty literature and just speak to some real people who have global experience of real problems, not ivory tower union leaders who care not a monkey's backside for society as a whole.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rogerout8875 very hard to prove certain claims in war, like numbers dead and numbers wounded. In their case, Ukraine has given us their numbers, and it ranges from 100 a day, to 300 a day, and when they were desperate for more weapons, they claimed 1000 a day. so, take your pick of the "true" number! Russia failed every major objective? of the 5 objectives, which one did Russia fail? You are aware of the 5 objectives as listed by Putin at the start of this, right? Or watching MSM has denied you that knowledge? One of the objectives, demilitarizing Ukraine, takes a long time. The good news is that in the end Russia will have demilitarized not only Ukraine but NATO too. 300 himars requested by Ukraine. 12 delivered. Russia close to the objective of demilitarizing NATO and Ukraine:)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@georgezee5173 only a fool would believe Liar Lucy word for word! You probably 100% believe her line about the sugary white substance she sells is not addictive and is of the finest quality, right?
it could well be that the 2 strangers did nothing bad to Jay, and it could be they tried to help him, either get him off the island or to a safe house, if Moroccan gangsters are after him. we simply don't know.
nothing in the interview helped with info about Jay's disappearance, but i have a feeling the interviewers messed up by not grilling these guys on why they had linked up with Jay.
the area they are searching is not that large! here in the Pyrenees, people disappear in the treacherous terrain regularly, and are found, dead or alive, in hours, with drones, dogs and helicopters. the weather conditions in Tenerife are perfect, maximum hours of sunlight, they can't find a trace after 12 days because Jay never went there! when they wake up and focus on the crime, or crimes, rather than the disappearance, they will get somewhere.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@FoolsDiary sorry, it's not a question of agreeing with sink or swim, or not. that's like saying you don't agree with the notion of rich and poor. it's a reality, and the question is how to deal with this reality.
In first world countries, there are hundreds of opportunities and safety nets, such as public education for all, NHS, universal credit. yet, despite the taxpayer being forced to provide all that "help", we still get people who do nothing but moan, complain, and get bitter about how life is so unfair. i would suggest all those who have enough money to support war in Ukraine and Green policies set up a volunteer charity to cover all the expenses of those in need. but the funny thing is, people prefer others to contribute, not themselves through charity.
I left Cornwall at a young age because it was clear to me Cornwall is a great place to visit or retire to, but not to make a living.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jamesmain_email6969 Western tanks will make no difference. Russia destroys them all. no air cover, no tanks.
Ukraine started this conflict with hundreds of tanks, and if you believe the Western media, captured loads of abandoned Russian tanks.
what happened to them all?
Throughout this conflict former Warsaw pact counties have been sending as many tanks as they can to Ukraine. what has happened to them all?
The West is in pure panic, because every time they send a "game changer", it makes no difference.
"more stingers, more javelins, more M777s, more himars, more Bradleys" and the chant goes on. but here we are, and the convicts and mercenaries are taking Soledar.
NATO's problem is that it is used to, and everything is predicated on, air superiority. in this conflict, it is the enemy that has air superiority, and NATO is stuck.
Believe me, the Western tanks will roll in, many will be destroyed before they get to the battlefield, and many will be destroyed on the battlefield.
there is also the chance Gerasimov will lead an invasion from Belarus that cuts off the supply route from Poland. Fingers crossed he does.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@luisekjeldsen1515 Russia, as a nation, is much more aware of its own history and its place in the world than the decadent, obese, superficial ignorant moronic masses of USA or Europe. Given the total ignorance you have shown so far, I seriously doubt that Russian school kids ARE taught that WW2 started in 1941. However, it may be for the same reason that most Americans think WW2 started with Pearl Harbor, in 1941. And it may be that Russians learn the Great Patriotic War, when USSR entered the conflict with its military might, started in 1941, which would be true. At least Russian school kids, by your own admission, are taught about WW2! Most Western kids have no bloody clue about any previous war, unless it appears on some video game. No education needed, thanks. but you certainly need to think, learn and reflect before writing such garbage.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@luisekjeldsen1515 if you truly believe in freedom and democracy, then you condemn the world's russophobia, right? You condemn the West for banning RT, you condemn travel restrictions on innocent Russian citizens, right? You condemn the Latvian court decision to jail a young man for trampling on the Ukrainian flag, right? You condemn the West for backing the coup that removed the democratically elected Yanulovich in 2014, right? You condemn Zelensky's banning all opposition parties in the Rada, right? Oh boy, if you love freedom and democracy, you must really hate what the West is doing and what has happened in Ukraine! Russia allows its people to leave Russia, but you would condemn the Ukrainian decision to prohibit men and women of fighting age from leaving Ukraine, right? You are nothing but an ignorant hypocrite who fails to see truth from the garbage the Western media have pumped into your tiny brain. Shame on you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1