Comments by "Anony Mousse" (@anon_y_mousse) on "DistroTube"
channel.
-
28
-
18
-
17
-
11
-
10
-
I mix hyphens and underscores in file names. I don't care about Windows users either or if they'll have problems with my filenames. Though I do try to keep to just lowercase because it's easier for me to type. However, there are always exceptions for me on that front, such as one I saw you have, AppImages, and my main folders in home which are still default names. On dates, my default screenshot name uses hyphens for the date and underscores for the time, though I'm perfectly fine with using colon as a time separator, and also setting a variable in bash with the date will only partially work. For instance, same day usage of a terminal window will correctly report the date, but if you keep the window open past midnight it'll still yield the previous date. A solution, which will only work from the terminal and not in shell scripts is to alias the date command and use `alias_in_question` as part of a filename. If using a shell script it would be helpful to use ~/.bash_aliases and just source it for scripts as well. Let's say you do:
alias T='date +"%H:%M:%S"' ; touch foo_bar-baz\:\:`T`; # and that'll work.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
It amazes me how many people don't understand what was stated, or the situation as it actually is. They're not closing the source of Linux the kernel, nor could they even if they wanted to. They won't be violating the terms of the GPL as they own the copyright to all the code they've produced and can change the license at any time. The GPL is only viral for third parties. People keep saying copyleft as though it's a legal term. It is not. If I write a piece of software and place it under the GPL, you can come along and make changes, but your changes must be open sourced. I can't incorporate your changes into my code without then contaminating my own copyright on the code, but if I ignore your changes, then I retain all of my rights to the code I've written and can then change the license to something proprietary and closed source, if I so desire. Of course, no one will read this, let alone the people in the comments section who need to read it, but whatever, here it is in case a miracle happens.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@AlucardNoir The sad thing is, most software that runs exclusively on Windows could be ported with ease, even really huge and complex programs that use lots of Win32 API functions. It's true that they don't see money or utility in porting to Linux, as @ErazerPT says, but that's mostly because they actually are evil. Adobe has contracts to fulfill and if they were more portable they'd not only violate contracts with the big OS vendors. They'd also invalidate all of their bullshit excuses over the past 30 years and would definitely cause a mass exodus, not just from Windows and Mac, but from Adobe as well. There's really nothing special about most software that people use, just tiny little quibbles that they can't see past to use alternatives. It took a lot of getting use to not having Visual Studio when I first switched to Linux, but Vim and a decent config for it makes the experience nearly the same. Although, I will admit that as this was 20+ years ago, as that may flavor someone's view on it.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@toby9999 I don't think you know what a strawman argument is if you think that is one. However, for the sake of argument, let's assume that open source projects only approach 30% of the functionality of closed source projects, which is a complete BS argument because they're much better than that, but in that event you also have the option of using WINE. If you want to argue that the base functionality of the OS is inferior to Windows, then I'll know you're arguing in bad faith because only a zombie could believe that. And yes, their behavior is in fact evil because they could still make profit without screwing over customers. Their behavior is that of a parasite, squeezing as much blood from you as they can. All of that said, I'd still argue that open source is superior because I don't believe for one second that the functionality equivalency is anywhere near that imbalanced and if it's as close as I'm estimating then the reason OSS wins is because you can modify the code to add features yourself. Since you bring up MSVS, I'm going to assume you're a programmer, and that means you could do so too, assuming yet again competency.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@shallex5744 Yeah, we'd have everything without GNU, it just would have taken a different form. I wouldn't mind if it was less socialism focused. The GPL, whatever version you want to use, restricts users far too much. If MIT or APL or any others along those lines had won out, Linux might have a larger user base, more developers, higher pay for those developing for it. Who knows. This is all speculation, because we won't ever know now, but given real world experience, it's probably an accurate guess.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Soulskinner It sounds like you don't understand what I was saying. Microsoft illegally used GPL code, full stop. No one who wrote any of that code made money off of it. If you write code and use a personal license, monetizing the code is up to you. If you don't monetize it in some way and release it, then the code was merely given away, and at that time it doesn't matter what license you use, as you won't make money off of writing it. The government should file an antitrust lawsuit against MS, but they apparently refuse to, and not just for illegally using something contrary to its license. The majority of people that get money from contributing to open source are getting that money from using their time to contribute, not from the source code itself. So it doesn't matter what license they use, it's the monetization methodology that matters. The GPL precludes doing some things which could allow a programmer to make more money, and especially off of their code directly. There's absolutely nothing to prevent a program from being open sourced several years later, or having a license that requires users of your program to not share the source code. If MIT or BSD or APL had been the go to choice for licensing, we might have had less open source, note might have, but even if we had, there would've likely been more money made and more code written professionally. Again I'll say it, that this is hypothetical, but if you understand the economics of it all, you'll realize it's a very likely scenario.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@juanzubieta5080 I don't even have a Templates folder. I deleted it myself because I didn't use it. I still see multiple files listed in the "Create New" menu. However, that's an XDG thing, not strictly KDE. I used KDE as an example because most new users will use it, but other DE's have the same functionality. You mention Mint, which uses Cinnamon by default, last I checked, and that is based on Gnome. So if it has it, then Gnome does too, which covers the two biggest DE's that people will use, whether a new user or not.
And in case you ask, I just checked if the functionality still works despite not having a Templates folder and yep, it sure does.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I don't hate Brave despite them using crypto, but some of the things they're promoting are questionable and I'd rather not risk getting stuck with them. And yes, all crypto is a scam, which is why I've never and will never "invest" in it. Sure, some people can get rich with it, just like the stock market, but it's still a scam, just like the stock market. I invest in physical things that will be very useful when society finally collapses, which based on how things are looking should be quite soon. However, I would like to see a new internet crop up. Something that follows an open standard that isn't influenced by some greedy corporation who wants to add feature xyz to drain more money from people's wallets. We need a single monolithic language to use for this, one that acts as markup, stylesheet and programming language all in one. I'm thinking of something based off of an unholy union of PostScript and LaTeX. Hopefully you check your notifications and see this as I'd like at least one opinion on it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
For me, I like to look at the background picture, so I don't have any icons and I autohide the taskbar. I don't use the quick launch or the menu, I just assign a shortcut key for the apps I use the most and press that. Win+F for FireFox, Win+C for Chromium, Win+O for Opera, Win+K for Konsole and so on. I've got multiple desktops, so icons can't really hide and even if I used every desktop I could hit Win+D to show it. I tend to use a terminal as my app launcher and always have at least 4 open for other tasks so Win+F{1..12} to get to a desktop and a simple cd where/my/file/at; foo bar baz & works fine for those programs that I use infrequently enough to not bother shortcutting. I don't remember if it was the default, but Win+, brings up the settings app for me, so adding shortcuts is easy. I've recently been toying with the tiling functionality and set up the Win+NumPad{1..4,6..9} to region shift things. It's kind of handy when you have four terminals and want to use all the screen real estate.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
GNU has held open source back, especially with its viral GPL. The reason that people ignore the GNU is not just because it's less important than the kernel, but also because it's an infection that we need to rid ourselves of to advance the state of OSS. For those that decry the "lack of freedom" that other licenses grant the users of a piece of software, they need to realize that in nature if you don't work you don't eat. If the only reason you like the GPL is because you get the source code for free, then you're not working and you shouldn't eat. If a company produces a software product and doesn't provide the source code, then simply don't buy it, but no one is entitled to anything for free and just because source is available doesn't mean you should be able to just have it willy nilly and do with it as you please. Yeah, our copyright system is fucked, and to a lesser extent our patent system, after all a patent does still expire after 17 years, but that doesn't validate anyone's reason for piracy. There is no piece of software that on its own will save your life.
Not that anyone will read this, but I do call Android a Linux distro and anyone that disagrees can get fucked. The only reason I often refer to it as Android being the sole moniker is because the additions they've made are what make it the unique system it is, whereas GNU's "contributions" can be replaced with no loss in function, as Android, Alpine and various other distros prove. So no, Stallman does not have a point. And to further drive home my point, Graphene and the various other Linux distros based off of Android remove a lot of the problems with Android and make it a much better system.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1