Comments by "Anony Mousse" (@anon_y_mousse) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

  1. And at that, a trespassing charge for being in the peoples building. They not only had every right to be there, but were invited in and guided around the building by the capitol police.
    23
  2. The truly stunning thing here is that shown proof of wrongdoing, the majority of these people hand waive it as though it means nothing.
    20
  3. Unfortunately, the traditional mode of consequences, the department of justice, has been taken over by evil. So for once they're actually correct that it can go on forever without consequences.
    10
  4. What does the acronym mean again? Divisiveness, Extra rights and Include everybody except those we hate?
    8
  5. Of course, but you can't forget that it's who counts the votes that counts the most, and the majority of election workers are on the left.
    8
  6.  @andrearossini8059  The person censoring is not speaking, though. If they merely opposed what was said by talking, then it would be about their speech. Even if what they say is a lie they'd at least have the right to say it.
    7
  7. Indeed, and his argument about it being conduct and not speech itself is a great one.
    5
  8.  @goldeneddie  I would also add that it's the governments job to back up its citizens and thus policing in this regard would be about allowing and not preventing speech, but that's just my own grammatical quibble with @jenni0278's post.
    5
  9.  @NerveFlux  If you didn't already see their agenda for what it is, this is a painful way to learn that lesson. Used to be you could live and let live and things were fine, but now they're pushing us all to a breaking point.
    4
  10.  @kayrutledge1970  What makes you think they were being condescending? Are you even refuting what they wrote? Or are you figuring out now how much of a scam the BBB bill was?
    3
  11.  @RomanvonUngernSternbergnrmfvus  Depending on your beliefs, you might think that God will do it. Otherwise, no, not one consequence.
    3
  12.  @ChrissyGrace2611  I think you misunderstood what he was saying.
    3
  13. *evasive, but yes.
    3
  14.  @cliff5043  So it's their fault for fighting fraudulent charges and being given no bail? You're either evil or stupid.
    2
  15.  @cliff5043  I guess that tells me the answer to my question.
    2
  16. What you're suggesting is precisely what they want so they can ban all guns.
    2
  17. They're looking to make the limit 8, then 6, 4, 2, 1, 0. Eventually no one will have any of their rights.
    2
  18.  @redman840  It's amazing how many dumb people say that without any clue of where their tax money goes. If the government did its job and only its job and taxed us commiserate with the amount they would need to do such, we'd pay a significant amount less in taxes and the budget would most assuredly not approach 1 trillion.
    1
  19. I find it unacceptable that the media and executive branch continue to collude spreading lies. The absolute propaganda spewed by Karine and then that idiot reporter talking about a loophole that doesn't exist. Sickening.
    1
  20.  @imagumdrop  It's because she and all the others on her side have been brainwashed. They think so many wrong things it's incredible. Like all the people saying "no one's forcing you to buy X", they genuinely think they're speaking the truth even while they themselves are actively being forced to buy X, Y and Z. What's worse is that the enforcement of this overreach is paid for with money stolen from we the people.
    1
  21. So we go from leftists with TDS to DDS. I guess you clean teeth now instead of make touchdowns?
    1
  22.  @kayrutledge1970  Multiple companies own multiple railroads, not one company owns them all. Privately funded doesn't mean they have to get all of their money privately, though in an ideal world they would. And apparently you agree that the BBB bill is indeed a scam, so I've got nothing left to say there.
    1
  23.  @kayrutledge1970  Lacking the tonality of verbal speech, nothing they wrote denoted actual condescension. It just seems as though you were "triggered" by a correction of any kind. Also, they might have been having a slight brainfart by specifying the number of companies, but the number is unimportant when correcting a misconception that only one company owns everything.
    1
  24.  @stevemarsh2152  Think about it like this, you have a gun, not even necessarily used, just in a holster or in your pants pocket, you cross the street and the light turns before you hit the other side. The cops, following their directives, and knowing that you possess said gun arrest you for jaywalking and then red flag you and take all of your guns away. It's not hypothetical either because people in states with heavy D populations and red flag laws have done similar without a crime even being committed. Just a relative phones up and says they're worried, and bam, cops take all of their guns and they're on a list preventing them from buying more ever again.
    1
  25.  @noinfo326  Do you actually believe that? If you sincerely believe that red flag laws are justified or that they would work, then I've got a bridge to sell you.
    1
  26. Kind of sounds like Idaho needs to have a recall election.
    1
  27. Personally, I'd like to get rid of plastic as a material, but not for environmental reasons, rather because it sucks compared to the best alternative, metal. Sure, some things probably are better served being plastic, but not everything. It's an inferior material and some things really should be made out of metal.
    1
  28. So you agree with Seth then, that the platform shouldn't be allowed to censor people that post to it?
    1
  29.  @antebagaric1970  Agreed, and I'm thinking we should do similar for all the rest of them.
    1