Comments by "Anony Mousse" (@anon_y_mousse) on "Forgotten Weapons" channel.

  1. 1100
  2. 392
  3. 277
  4. 64
  5. 37
  6. 32
  7. 24
  8. 23
  9. 22
  10. 21
  11. 19
  12. 18
  13. 17
  14. 16
  15. 15
  16. 15
  17. 13
  18. 12
  19. 12
  20. 11
  21. 11
  22. 10
  23. 10
  24. 10
  25. 10
  26. 10
  27. 9
  28. 9
  29. 9
  30. 9
  31. 8
  32. 8
  33. 7
  34. 7
  35. 7
  36. 7
  37. 7
  38. 7
  39. 7
  40. 7
  41. 7
  42. 7
  43. 7
  44. 6
  45. 6
  46. 6
  47. 6
  48. 6
  49. 6
  50. 5
  51. 5
  52. 5
  53. 5
  54. 5
  55. 5
  56. 5
  57. 4
  58. 4
  59. 4
  60. 4
  61. 4
  62. 4
  63. 4
  64. 4
  65. 3
  66. 3
  67. 3
  68. 3
  69. 3
  70. 3
  71. 3
  72. 3
  73. 3
  74. 3
  75. 3
  76. 3
  77. 3
  78. 3
  79. 3
  80. 3
  81. 3
  82. 3
  83. 2
  84. 2
  85. 2
  86. 2
  87. 2
  88. 2
  89. 2
  90. 2
  91. 2
  92. 2
  93. 2
  94. 2
  95. 2
  96. 2
  97. 2
  98. 2
  99. 2
  100. 2
  101. 2
  102. 2
  103. 2
  104. 2
  105. 2
  106. 2
  107. 2
  108. 2
  109. 2
  110. 2
  111. 2
  112. 2
  113. 2
  114. 2
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. Not nearly enough people have come to realize the truth, but the slippery slope is real. They keep nibbling away at what they deem acceptable until all gun content is just outright banned. As far as moving to a new platform, I prefer ad supported content because I would like to maintain some modicum of anonymity on the internet. The best type of ads are those that are embedded in the video because I can watch them at 2x like I do for all video content that allows it, and only if they're obnoxious will I skip them, but the content creator will still have gotten paid. I think the more fair business model for YouTube should be that they get nothing from the creators unless the creators get ad money from a sponsor. If the agreement was getting a cut of your sponsorship money then it would be the perfect platform, free-ish but supported by ads through the creator. Then the users would be able to take or leave the ads as they please, the creators would get paid, YouTube would get paid, and most people would be happy. However, YouTube is greedy and still runs forced ads on content which doesn't have monetization turned on and takes all of the profit from that. Yeah, they have server costs, but they're getting so much ad money that it's literally impossible for them to not be turning a profit unless they're mismanaging things behind the scenes, and that's not on any of us, users or content creators, to fix and/or make up for. It also should not be in their purview of what content to censor so long as such content is legal.
    1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1